ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Physiol.
Sec. Exercise Physiology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1653896
Biomarker of muscle damage and oxidative stress and biomechanical responses of two different Advanced Footwear Technology to a 60-min running test in competitive long-distance runners
Provisionally accepted- 1Sports Training Laboratory, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo, Spain
- 2Department of Physical Education and Sport, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Objective: This study aimed to analyse the influence of Advanced Footwear Technology (AFT) on biomechanical, muscle damage, metabolic and oxidative stress markers in experienced long-distance runners. Methods: Using a counter-balanced randomized experimental design with twelve tier 3 male runners, two AFTs were tested: (1) Cloudboom Strike (CS) and (2) Cloudboom Echo 3 (CE). All participants completed, in both conditions, a graded exercise test (GXT) to determine the VT1, followed by a prolonged effort test (60-min) at an intensity 10% above VT1. Finally a GXT to exhaustion to assess the changes in biomechanical parameters in a fatigued state was performed. 24-h before and after each visit, blood samples were drawn for muscle damage, metabolic and oxidative stress determination. Results: CK increased post-visit in both CS and CE (p=0.026; ES=0.69 and p=0.018; ES=0.59; respectively). However, no other significant differences pre- and post-visit were found in lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), Interleukin-6 (IL-6), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), cortisol or total antioxidant status (TAS) in either the CS or CE conditions. There were no differences between conditions in any of the biomarkers measured, although participants perceived lower DOMS post-24h with the CS model (p=0.016; ES=0.71). We found no shoe × time interaction in any biomechanical parameter evaluated during the prolonged effort or any variable at any speed stage between footwear conditions in the GXT to exhaustion. Conclusion: According to our results, both the Cloudboom Strike and the Cloudboom Echo 3 models appear to provide minimal biomarker responses under these conditions after a 60-min treadmill run, regards to reducing muscle damage, oxidative and metabolic stress, soreness, and inflammation. This indicates attenuated biomarker responses when compared to previous studies with traditional footwear.
Keywords: Inflammation, performance, cushioning, Running shoes, Marathon
Received: 25 Jun 2025; Accepted: 17 Sep 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Alda Blanco, González-Mohíno, González-Ravé and Santos-Concejero. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Alejandro Alda Blanco, alejandro.alda@uclm.es
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.