Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

CASE REPORT article

Front. Physiol.

Sec. Cardiac Electrophysiology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1654085

Navigating Treatment Decisions in Arrhythmogenic Mitral Valve Prolapse with PVC-Induced Ventricular Fibrillation: A Case Report and Literature Review

Provisionally accepted
Ali  AlzammamAli Alzammam1,2*Faisal  AlanaziFaisal Alanazi1,2Sultan  AlenazySultan Alenazy1,2Abdulmahsen  AlsalmanAbdulmahsen Alsalman1,2Maysan  AlmegbelMaysan Almegbel1,2Ahmed  AljizeeriAhmed Aljizeeri1,2Muneera  AltaweelMuneera Altaweel3Abdulmohsen  AlmusaadAbdulmohsen Almusaad1,2
  • 1National Guard Hospital, King Abdulaziz City, Saudi Arabia
  • 2King Abdulaziz Cardiac Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • 3King Abdulaziz Hospital, MNGHA, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia, Saudi Arabia

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) is a common condition, typically benign, but in a small subset of patients, it may lead to life-threatening arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death (SCD). This arrhythmogenic MVP phenotype is often associated with bileaflet prolapse, mitral annular disjunction (MAD), and myocardial fibrosis identified via late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on cardiac MRI. Case Summary: Our patient is a 49-year-old man presented with monomorphic ventricular tachycardia and near-syncope. Echocardiography showed bileaflet MVP, MAD and mild regurgitation. Cardiac MRI revealed fibrosis in the papillary muscle. Electrophysiological study (EPS) confirmed inducible ventricular fibrillation (VF) triggered by papillary muscle PVCs. Catheter ablation was successfully performed, eliminating the arrhythmic focus. Despite successful ablation, an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) was implanted for secondary prevention, given the high-risk structural substrate. The patient remained arrhythmia-free over two years of follow-up. Discussion: This case highlights critical diagnostic markers—bileaflet prolapse and LGE—associated with arrhythmogenic MVP. While ablation may suppress triggers, it does not completely eliminate the underlying substrate. Current expert consensus supports ICD implantation in patients with sustained VT/VF or sudden cardiac arrest, regardless of ablation success. Management should be individualized based on risk profile, imaging findings, and clinical presentation. Conclusion: Malignant MVP warrants comprehensive evaluation with echocardiography, cardiac MRI, and EPS. Catheter ablation is effective in eliminating arrhythmic foci, but ICD therapy remains essential for secondary prevention. Future high-quality trials and clear guidelines for diagnosis, risk stratification, and management are essential to avoid both over- and under-treatment, ensuring optimal outcomes for the patients with MVP.

Keywords: ventricular tachcardia, Ventricular fibrilation, ventricular ablation, Mitral valve prolaps, premature ventricle contraction/complex, Late enhancement gadolinium

Received: 25 Jun 2025; Accepted: 21 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Alzammam, Alanazi, Alenazy, Alsalman, Almegbel, Aljizeeri, Altaweel and Almusaad. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Ali Alzammam, National Guard Hospital, King Abdulaziz City, Saudi Arabia

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.