Effect of six weeks of blood flow restriction combined with Tabata training on anaerobic capacity in male badminton players

Yuancheng Xia¹Xin Zheng²Kaixiang Zhou²Leyi Jiang³Bojun Song¹Shuxian Xu¹Zhangyuting Shang^1,4*Jin Dai^1*

• ¹Sports Coaching College, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China
• ²College of Physical Education and Health Science, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing, China
• ³School of Strength and Conditioning Training, Beijing Sport University,, Beijing, China
• ⁴College of Physical Education and Health Management, Chongqing University of Education, Chongqing, China

Background: Blood flow restriction (BFR) combined with high-intensity interval training (HIIT) is increasingly recognized as an effective strategy for enhancing aerobic capacity and muscle strength in athletes. However, there is no consensus on the effects of BFR combined with HIIT on anaerobic capacity. Objective: This study aims to examine the effects of BFR combined with Tabata training (BFR-Tabata), a type of HIIT, on anaerobic capacity in male badminton players. Methods: Thirty male badminton players (age: 20.4±1.2 years) were randomized to the BFR-Tabata group (n=15) or the Tabata group (n=15). Both groups performed 6 weeks (3 times per week) of Tabata training (20 seconds maximal effort/10 seconds rest x 8 sets x 4 rounds). Pre and post-intervention assessments included a 30-second Badminton-specific endurance test, countermovement jump (CMJ), squat jump (SJ), and Wingate anaerobic test (peak power [PP], average power [AP], fatigue index [FI], time to peak [TTP]). A two-way repeated measures ANOVA (time × group) was used to analyze training effects, with Bonferroni post hoc tests. Effect sizes were reported as partial eta squared ( ) or Cohen's d, with significance set at p < 0.05. Results: The BFR-Tabata training intervention significantly improved anaerobic endurance among male badminton athletes. In comparison to the Tabata group, the BFR-Tabata group exhibited statistically significant differences in badminton-specific endurance (p = 0.02, d = 0.92, moderate effect) and multiple anaerobic performance indicators assessed by the Wingate test, including PP (p = 0.01, d = 1.11, moderate effect), AP (p < 0.01, d = 1.51, large effect), and TTP (p < 0.01, d = 2.10, very large). However, no statistically significant difference was observed in lower limb explosive strength measures, including CMJ (p=0.50, d = 0.25, small effect), SJ (p = 0.56, d = 0.21, small effect), or during the Wingate test the FI (F = 0.138, p = 0.71, = 0.005, trivial effect). Conclusion: Blood flow restriction combined with Tabata training is an effective strategy for improving anaerobic capacity in male badminton players, but it has limited enhancement of lower-limb explosive strength.