ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Physiol., 24 November 2025

Sec. Integrative Physiology

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2025.1663545

Finite element-based prioritization of pelvic floor muscles for rehabilitation to maintain urinary and fecal control in elderly women

  • 1. School of Nursing, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China

  • 2. College of Nursing and Rehabilitation, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, Hebei, China

  • 3. Department of Colorectal Surgery, Beijing Erlonglu Hospital, Beijing, China

  • 4. School of Biomedical Engineering, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China

Abstract

Objective:

This study aims to utilize finite element analysis (FEA) to explore the effects of different rehabilitation training methods on the ability of elderly women to maintain urinary and fecal control. It also seeks to determine the muscle prioritization during pelvic rehabilitation training, providing a scientific basis for personalized rehabilitation nursing.

Methods:

A 3D pelvic-thigh modeling was constructed based on CT and MRI images from a 70-year-old Chinese elderly female volunteer. Model validity was verified by assessing relative changes in waist circumference, RVA, and ARA against imaging measurements, with geometric deviations controlled within 10%. The material properties of the muscles were altered to simulate the effects of five different physical rehabilitation methods. By comparing changes in the retrovesical angle (RVA) and anorectal angulation (ARA) under different muscle material properties settings, the relationship between rehabilitation training methods and urinary and fecal control was quantified.

Results:

The constructed model demonstrated high geometric consistency with pelvic floor anatomy, showing less than 8.28% deviation from imaging-based measurements. As muscle material properties improved, the RVA gradually decreased, and the ARA gradually increased, approaching normal ranges. The results highlight the critical roles of the levator ani, pelvic floor, rectus abdominis, erector spinae, and hip muscles.

Conclusion:

The findings from this simulation indicate the potential efficacy of rehabilitation training in supporting urinary and fecal control. The study emphasizes the importance of personalized pelvic floor rehabilitation programs based on gender differences, muscle status, and dysfunction types, offering new perspectives and possibilities for using FEA in elderly populations. Nevertheless, the findings are derived from a single-subject model and computational simulations without direct clinical validation, which may limit generalizability.

Clinical Trial Registration:

identifier (ChiCTR2400080749) (20240206).

1 Introduction

Our world is becoming increasingly aged, approximately 1.4 billion people aged 60 and above in 2022, and it is expected that this number will double globally by 2050 (). The growing aging population has exacerbated health challenges related to aging, the overall muscle capacity decreases in elderly individuals, including the pelvic floor, partially leads to the occurrence of urinary incontinence, fecal incontinence, and constipation (Talasz et al., 2018; ; ; Salari et al., 2023; Zhang et al., 2023). There are various reasons for elderly people to develop urinary and defecation dysfunction, one of which is that the excretion of feces and urine is controlled and regulated by the neuromuscular system. For elderly individuals who have not completely lost urinary and fecal control, five physical rehabilitation methods, including exercise training, magnetic stimulation, electrical stimulation, vibration stimulation, and biofeedback, have been shown to enhance pelvic floor muscle strength and improve urinary and defecation dysfunction (; ; ; ; ; ; Yang J. et al., 2024).

For muscle rehabilitation training for elderly people with different types of urinary and defecation dysfunction, a “one size fits all” strategy should not be used. Personalization is a extremely important issue (Pinto et al., 2020; ; Sarrió et al., 2021; Suhonen et al., 2022). Taking constipation as an example, strategies based on individual risk factors of elderly constipation patients have been proven to reduce the occurrence of constipation (). However, the muscle prioritization for the rehabilitation of elderly individuals with urinary and defecation dysfunction is still not fully understood. It is necessary to explore the quantitative relationship between different rehabilitation training methods and urinary and defecation control ability, in order to provide guidance for personalized rehabilitation training practices.

Finite element analysis (FEA) is an appropriate research methodology for investigating complex relationships between rehabilitation training and pelvic floor function, as it is capable of precisely simulating pelvic floor complex structures and intricate biomechanical behaviors. One of the key advantages of the FEA is that it eliminates the need for human experimentation, thereby ensuring a high level of safety, while also facilitating the execution of numerous experiments. For instance, muscle parameters were varied to observe the corresponding changes in outcome indicators. This approach is not only cost-effective but also highly efficient (Wang et al., 2024a; ). As an advanced tool for biomechanical research, FEA has been widely applied in obstetrics and gynecology, highlighting its contributions in simulating pelvic floor dysfunctions (). Notable studies have simulated female pelvic floor analysis (Xu et al., 2023; Soliman et al., 2023), pelvic organ prolapses in women (Silva et al., 2024; Yang M. et al., 2024; Xue et al., 2023), urethral support functions (Peng et al., 2016), levator ani muscle injuries during vaginal delivery and pelvic floor disorders (Zhou LX. et al., 2020), and the mechanical mechanisms of posterior vaginal prolapse (Qiu, 2017). These previous applications have contributed to the development of pelvic floor simulation models for elderly individuals.

Other studies (Ren et al., 2015; ; ; ) have developed pelvic floor models for female individuals aged 55, 63, and 70 years. However, these existing finite element models are limited to simulating the pelvic floor muscles and tissues neglecting the abdominal, hip, and back muscles, which are critical for rehabilitation training beyond the pelvic floor and play significant roles in urinary and fecal control. Consequently, the current female pelvic floor finite element models offer limited representation of the full spectrum of muscles involved in urination and defecation. Furthermore, these models typically do not address the unique anatomical and physiological characteristics of elderly populations. Few studies have focused on rehabilitation outcomes and the role of muscle prioritization, especially in elderly women with pelvic floor dysfunctions. Therefore, a more comprehensive composite model is needed, one that integrates not only pelvic floor muscles but also abdominal, hip, and back muscles, to provide more accurate rehabilitation guidance tailored for elderly women.

We previously established to establish a finite element model in elderly males, using FEA to explore the quantitative relationship between different rehabilitation training methods and urinary and defecatory control ability (Wang et al., 2024b). The research findings can elucidate the muscle prioritization for rehabilitation training in elderly men suffering from various types of urinary and defecation dysfunction. However, marked physiological and anatomical differences exist between male and female pelvic floors. For example, women have a greater colonic length, a larger rectal cross-sectional area, and lack a prostate but possess female-specific structures such as the uterus, vagina, urethral detrusor muscle and urethrovaginal sphincter. Functionally, females are more prone to deficiencies in the maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) strength and endurance of the external anal sphincter and puborectal muscle, whereas males more commonly exhibit elevated muscle tone and incomplete relaxation (). These differences alter muscle support mechanisms and mechanical load distribution, making it unfeasible to accurately assess female-specific conditions using male model data alone. Therefore, it is necessary to construct a female-specific finite element model to enhance the biological and clinical relevance of pelvic floor simulations. Such a model would allow a direct comparison with male models under the same analytical framework, thereby clarifying sex-based differences in rehabilitation, guiding sex-specific optimization of clinical treatment strategies, and providing more effective personalized rehabilitation plans for elderly patients with urinary and defecatory dysfunction.

This study aims to clarify the relationship between muscle function in elderly women and rehabilitation training, prioritizing the identification of key muscles essential for urinary and defecatory rehabilitation. As early as 2011, constructed a FEA of the pelvis and levator ani muscles by performing pelvic CT and MRI scans on healthy elderly nulliparous female volunteers. This approach avoided the disadvantage of relying on cadaveric specimen dissection previously used to obtain models. This study aims to collect CT and MRI data from a normal elderly female volunteer and establish a composite finite element model of the pelvic floor. Following the model construction, the study will conduct quantitative validation of the finite element model, to ensure its validity and guarantee the accuracy of the finite element analysis. Similar to the validation method used in the Peng Y’S study (Peng et al., 2016), we compared whether the Valsalva movement process simulated by the patient’s finite element model and the Valsalva movement in the patient’s actual dynamic MRI produced consistent changes (including ARA, RVA, and waist circumference) as a validation method. Muscle material properties, such as the material modulus, are typically related to their physical characteristics. The material modulus describes the ability of muscles to deform under force. Research indicates that the material properties of muscles, including the elastic modulus, may change following rehabilitation training (; Peng et al., 2016). Muscle contraction can cause changes in the internal structure of muscles, increasing their resistance to deformation, reflected in an increase in elastic modulus (; Stafford et al., 2017; ; ). Under various simulation plans of FEA, the study will proportionally alter muscle material properties to simulate the rehabilitation effects of five physical therapy methods (Peng et al., 2016; ; ). For the observed outcome measures, this study selected retrovesical angle (RVA) and anorectal angulation (ARA), which are used to assess the ability of elderly individuals to voluntarily control urination and defecation (Zhou and Lai, 2021; ). Among them, RVA is the angle formed between the base of the bladder and the long axis of the urethra in the mid-sagittal plane, and ARA is the angle between the longitudinal axis of the anal canal and the posterior wall of the rectum above the levator ani muscle. Ultimately, the study aims to quantify the relationship between rehabilitation training methods and urinary and fecal control by comparing the changes in outcome indicators under different muscle material properties parameter settings. The results of this study will provide answers to our research question regarding how to implement personalized and targeted rehabilitation training for elderly individuals with, taking into account different genders and types of conditions urinary and defecation dysfunction.

2 Methods

2.1 Muscles

After a thorough literature review, we summarized the muscles targeted by five rehabilitation training methods for urinary and defecation dysfunction, which include the pelvic floor muscles, core abdominal muscles, and core hip muscles (Table 1).

TABLE 1

TypesRehabilitation trainingMuscles
Urinary incontinencePelvic floor muscle training1. Pelvic floor muscles training: pelvic floor muscles group; Urethral sphincter and levator ani muscle
2. Suspension exercise training: pelvic floor muscles + urethral sphincter and abdominal muscles and hip muscles + back muscles
3. Hip muscle exercise: pelvic floor muscles group and hip muscles
Electrical stimulationPelvic floor muscles group
Magnetic stimulationPelvic floor muscles group
BiofeedbackPelvic floor muscles group; levator ani muscle
Vibrational stimulationPelvic floor muscles group
Fecal incontinencePelvic floor muscle trainingPelvic floor muscles group; pelvic floor muscles group and external anal sphincter
Electrical stimulationSacral nerve anterior root electrical stimulation: pelvic floor muscles group; pelvic floor muscles group and external anal sphincter
Magnetic stimulationPelvic floor muscle group; pelvic floor muscles group and abdominal muscles + back muscles
BiofeedbackPelvic floor muscles group; pelvic floor muscles group and external anal sphincter
Vibrational stimulationNone
ConstipationPelvic floor muscle trainingPelvic floor muscles group; levator ani muscle and external anal sphincter
Electrical stimulationPelvic floor muscles group
Magnetic stimulationPelvic floor muscles group; levator ani muscle and external anal sphincter
BiofeedbackPelvic floor muscles group; levator ani muscle and external anal sphincter
Vibrational stimulationPelvic floor muscles group

Muscles corresponding to five rehabilitation training methods for urinary and defecation dysfunction.

The pelvic floor muscles group includes the bulbospongiosus muscle, ischiocavernosus muscle, superficial transverse perineal muscle, external anal sphincter, deep transverse perineal muscle, urethral sphincter, levator ani, and coccygeal muscle. The levator ani muscle includes the pubococcygeus muscle, iliococcygeus muscle, and puborectalis muscle. In this study, the abdominal muscle specifically refers to the rectus abdominis muscle, while the hip muscles specifically refers to the iliopsoas muscle, quadriceps femoris muscle, gluteus maximus muscle, hamstring muscle, gluteus medius muscle, and adductor longus muscle. In this study, the back muscle specifically refers to the erector spinae muscle.

2.2 Participant

Relevant ethical approval was obtained from Capital Medical University (ethics approval numbers: Lin Yan Shen [2023] 079 and Z2024SY007) and the study has been registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Center (ChiCTR2400080749). This study selected an elderly woman as a typical representative of healthy elderly pelvic anatomy. The participant was a 70-year-old Chinese female (height: 1.56 m, weight: 45 kg, BMI: 18.49 kg/m2) with good physical health, normal cognitive, communication, and daily living abilities, normal pelvic floor function, and no history of bowel dysfunction or related surgeries. The volunteer signed an informed consent form before undergoing CT, static MRI, and dynamic MRI scans, as shown in Figure 1. Details regarding the inclusion and exclusion criteria and specific data collection methods are provided in the Supplementary Material of our previously published protocol (Wang et al., 2024a).

FIGURE 1

The image acquisition was performed after emptying the bladder and rectum, and the participant was able to perform both resting and Valsalva maneuvers under the guidance of professional technicians. Based on the medical imaging data from the elderly female volunteer, we established a 3D modeling of the pelvis and thigh muscles. The method for establishing the finite element model is similar to that described in our previous study (Wang et al., 2024b). The segmentation process was conducted under the guidance of experienced pelvic floor imaging specialists. The researchers first used Mimics 20.0, a medical image processing software, to reconstruct an initial 3D model based on CT and MRI data. This preliminary model was then refined using the smoothing function within Mimics to reduce point and edge angularity and ensure smoother anatomical surfaces. After these adjustments, the final optimized 3D model was exported and imported into Ansys 2020 R1 for subsequent finite element numerical simulations.

2.3 Material properties

When setting material properties for the model, we reviewed existing material data from previous studies (Peng et al., 2016; ; ; ; ; Venugopala Rao et al., 2010; Xu et al., 2021; ; Samavati et al., 2015; ; Sichting et al., 2014; Zong, 2022; ; Ricci et al., 2018; ; Zhang et al., 2009; ; Rao et al., 2010; Silva et al., 2016; Xuan et al., 2021; ; Wu, 2019; ; ; Sun, 2015; ) and summarized the recognized mechanical parameters reported in the literature (Table 2). Studies have shown differences in the mechanical properties of pelvic soft tissues between elderly and younger populations, with potential variations in material properties (). Based on these findings, we made gradual adjustments to the material properties of the pelvic floor muscles to reflect the expected biomechanical changes with aging. These adjustments were made incrementally until the differences between the finite element model and dynamic MRI measurements of ARA, RVA, and waist circumference were within 10%. This process ensured that the model accurately simulated the physiological changes that occur with aging.

TABLE 2

No.Anatomical elementMaterial constantsStructuresConstitutive models
In the literaturesAfter adjustment
1BladderC10 = 0.071
C20 = 0.202
C30 = 0.048 (; )
C10 = 0.061
C20 = 0.202
C30 = 0.048
hyperelastic structures (; Venugopala Rao et al., 2010)Yeoh (; )
2UrethraC10 = 0.071
C20 = 0.282
C30 = 0.048
3RectumC10 = 0.088
C20 = 3.092
C30 = 2.871 ()
C10 = 0.082
C20 = 3.092
C30 = 2.871
4Uterusyoung’s module 2 MPa (Samavati et al., 2015; )
Poisson’s ratio 0.45 (Samavati et al., 2015; )
young’s module 2.5 MPa
Poisson’s ratio 0.45
linear elastic structures ()Hooke ()
5Vaginayoung’s module 2 MPa (Samavati et al., 2015; )
Poisson’s ratio 0.49 ()
young’s module 2.8 MPa
Poisson’s ratio 0.49
6Hipboneyoung’s module 15244 MPa (Sichting et al., 2014)
Poisson’s ratio 0.3 (; Sichting et al., 2014; Zong, 2022; ; Ricci et al., 2018; )
No changerigid body (; Xu et al., 2021)
7Sacrumyoung’s module 16262 MPa (Sichting et al., 2014)
Poisson’s ratio 0.3 (; Sichting et al., 2014; Zong, 2022; ; Ricci et al., 2018; )
8Coccyxyoung’s module 11000 MPa (Sichting et al., 2014)
Poisson’s ratio 0.3 (; Sichting et al., 2014; Zong, 2022; ; Ricci et al., 2018; )
9Femuryoung’s module 13500 MPa ()
Poisson’s ratio 0.3 (; Sichting et al., 2014; Zong, 2022; ; Ricci et al., 2018; )
10Fatyoung’s module 0.05 MPa ()
Poisson’s ratio 0.49 (; Zhang et al., 2009; )
linear elastic structures (Peng et al., 2016; ; Rao et al., 2010)Hooke (Peng et al., 2016; ; Rao et al., 2010)
11Bulbospongiosus muscleyoung’s module 2.4 MPa (Peng et al., 2016; ; Zhang et al., 2009; Rao et al., 2010)
Poisson’s ratio 0.49 (; Rao et al., 2010)
young’s module 3.4 MPa
Poisson’s ratio 0.49
12Ischiocavernous muscle
13Superficial transverse perineal muscle, deep transverse perineal muscle
14External anal sphincterC10 = 11.8 KPa
C20 = 5.53e-3 KPa (Silva et al., 2016)
C10 = 12.8 KPa
C20 = 5.53e-3 KPa
hyperelastic structures (Silva et al., 2016; Xuan et al., 2021)Mooney-Rivlin (Silva et al., 2016)
15Urethral sphincter
16Urethral detrusor muscleyoung’s module 2.4 MPa (; Zhang et al., 2009)
Poisson’s ratio 0.49 ()
young’s module 3.4 MPa
Poisson’s ratio 0.49
linear elastic structures (Samavati et al., 2015)Hooke (Samavati et al., 2015)
17Urethrovaginal sphincter
18Coccygeal muscleyoung’s module 2.4 MPa (; Zhang et al., 2009)
Poisson’s ratio 0.49 (; Xu et al., 2021)
No change
19Levator ani muscle, including pubococcygeus muscle, iliococcygeus muscle, puborectalis muscleC10= 2.5 KPa
C20= 0.625 KPa (; Wu, 2019)
hyperelastic structures ()Mooney-Rivlin (Wu, 2019)
20Obturator internus muscleyoung’s module 0.95 MPa (Peng et al., 2016; ; )
Poisson’s ratio 0.45 ()
viscoelastic materials ()Hooke
21Rectus abdominis muscleyoung’s module 13.3 MPa ()
Poisson’s ratio 0.45 ()
22Lliac muscleyoung’s module 19 MPa ()
Poisson’s ratio 0.45 ()
23Psoas major muscleyoung’s module 13.3 MPa (Sun, 2015)
Poisson’s ratio 0.45 ()
24Quadriceps femoris muscle
25Tensor fascia lata muscle
26Gluteus maximus muscleyoung’s module 19 MPa ()
Poisson’s ratio 0.45 ()
27Gluteus medius muscle
28Piriformis muscle
29Hamstring musclesyoung’s module 13.3 MPa (Sun, 2015)
Poisson’s ratio 0.45 ()
30Pectineus muscle
31Adductor longus muscle
32Latissimus dorsi muscle
33Erector spinae muscle

Material properties of various parts of the model.

Due to the complexity and irregularity of structures in the human body, an unstructured meshing approach was adopted for volumetric mesh generation, resulting in a model with a mixed mesh of tetrahedral and hexahedral elements. This hybrid meshing approach leverages the advantages of both element types. Tetrahedral meshes offer greater flexibility in handling complex geometries, while hexahedral meshes generally provide higher computational efficiency and accuracy during numerical simulations. This combination ensures model accuracy while enhancing computational efficiency.

2.4 Constraint boundaries

The coordinates for the 3D finite element model were set as follows: the x-axis was perpendicular to the sagittal plane of the body, with the positive direction pointing to the left; the y-axis was perpendicular to the coronal plane, with the positive direction pointing backward; the z-axis was the longitudinal axis of the body, with the positive direction pointing toward the head. To simulate the in vivo state of muscles related to urinary and fecal control as accurately as possible, the bones were set as rigid bodies, and all nodes were fully constrained to prevent translation and rotation along the x, y, and z-axes. The tops of the rectus abdominis, psoas major, and erector spinae muscles were fixed, and bindings were established between the bones and muscles, between the bladder and uterus, as well as between the uterus and colon.

2.5 Mesh sensitivity analysis

Mesh generation is a key step (Pisarciuc et al., 2023). To verify the sensitivity of the finite element model results to the mesh discretization, a mesh independence study was conducted (). Under the condition of consistent geometry, material properties, boundary conditions, and load settings, two mesh models with different densities were created: the original mesh density (100%) and a refined mesh density (130%) (). The same working condition (Condition No.1) was applied to solve both mesh models, and the total deformation cloud maps were output. The relative change rate of the maximum total deformation value was used to evaluate mesh convergence. A relative change rate of 1∼5% was considered to indicate that the model had met the mesh independence verification ().

2.6 Model validity verification

It is essential to verify the effectiveness of the finite element model during the modeling process. In this study, when acquiring dynamic MRI data, the patient was instructed to perform the Valsalva maneuver. The Valsalva maneuver was performed by participants under breath-holding conditions to simulate the increase intra-abdominal pressure for forceful evacuation of bladder and rectal contents, with the sustained effort maintained for 10 s. The results of this maneuver were used for model validation through a geometric verification method. The specific method for geometric validation involved comparing the three anatomical landmarks related to the pelvic floor Valsalva maneuver in the elderly woman during dynamic MRI scanning with those simulated in the 3D finite element model. The relative changes in these three anatomical landmarks between the imaging and simulation were assessed to determine whether they fell within an acceptable range. The three anatomical landmarks used include the abdominal waistline, RVA, and ARA (sagittal plane). For the Valsalva simulation, the loading site was the anterior abdominal wall. Under resting conditions, the material modulus (E) was 0.019 MPa, while the load due to abdominal pressure was 0.5 KPa. Under moderate tension, E was 0.241 MPa and the abdominal pressure was 4.5 KPa. Under high tension, E was 0.947 MPa and the abdominal pressure was 5.0 KPa (Wu, 2019). The applied direction of force was from the top of the anterior abdominal wall toward the coccyx (Qiu, 2017).

2.7 Applied loads and simulation plans analysis

The 3D finite element model was used to simulate and analyze the impact of different physical rehabilitation methods on muscle function. Owing to the inability of FEA to directly simulate rehabilitation training, the rehabilitation effects were assessed by adjusting the material properties of the muscles. The elastic modulus, which is the ratio of deformation to applied force, is an important parameter for evaluating muscle stiffness. Studies have shown that rehabilitation exercises, such as muscle contraction training and resistance exercises, can indirectly influence this modulus, leading to a reduction in passive stiffness and an increase in muscle softness and flexibility ().

Under different simulation plans, this study proportionally adjusted the material properties of muscles to theoretically simulate changes in muscle function after different rehabilitation training methods (Peng et al., 2016; ; ). Specifically, the material constants of the muscles involved in the rehabilitation training were adjusted to 2 times, 1.75 times, 1.5 times, 1.25 times, 1 time, 0.75 times, 0.5 times, 0.25 times, and 0.05 times, simulating muscle capacity changes of +100%, +75%, +50%, +25%, normal, −25%, −50%, −75%, and −95%, respectively. The elastic modulus of pelvic floor and related muscles was varied from 0.05 times to 2.0 times of the baseline values to represent a wide spectrum of physiological conditions ranging from severe impairment to strengthening. This approach has been previously adopted in computational modeling studies. For example, applied multiplicative factors from 0.05 times to 2.0 times to muscle material properties in their finite element analysis of pelvic floor dynamics during high-impact activities, thereby providing a precedent for this parameter variation strategy.

The relationship between rehabilitation training and the ability to control urinary and fecal functions was primarily quantified by comparing the differences in RVA and ARA using different material properties. This helped in identifying which muscles showed the greatest improvement in urinary and defecation control ability after rehabilitation training (Table 3).

TABLE 3

Conditions no.Simulated rehabilitation trainingsLoading siteAbdominal pressureOutcome indicators
1Anal sphincter training for fecal incontinenceExternal anal sphincter0.6 KPa (Wang et al., 2024b; Song et al., 2012; )ARA
2Biofeedback for urinary incontinence
Exercise training for fecal incontinence-levator ani activities
Exercise training for constipation-levator ani exercise
Levator ani muscle0.6 KPa (Wang et al., 2024b; Song et al., 2012; )RVA, ARA
3Exercise training for urinary incontinenceLevator ani muscle and urethral sphincter0.6 KPa (Wang et al., 2024b; Song et al., 2012; )RVA
4Magnetic stimulation of constipation
Biofeedback of constipation
Exercise training for constipation
Levator ani muscle and external anal sphincter0.6 KPa (Wang et al., 2024b; Song et al., 2012; )ARA
5Exercise training for urinary incontinence
Electrical stimulation for urinary incontinence
Magnetic stimulation for urinary incontinence
Biofeedback for urinary incontinence
Vibrational stimulation for urinary incontinence
Electrical stimulation for fecal incontinence-sacral nerve anterior root electrical stimulation
Biofeedback for fecal incontinence combined with pelvic floor muscle training
Magnetic stimulation for fecal incontinence
Exercise training for constipation-pelvic floor muscle training
Tibial nerve electrical stimulation, sacral nerve electrical stimulation, and transcutaneous acupoint electrical stimulation for constipation
Magnetic stimulation for constipation
Biofeedback for constipation
Vibrational stimulation for constipation
Pelvic floor muscles0.6 KPa (Wang et al., 2024b; Song et al., 2012; )RVA, ARA
6Magnetic stimulation for fecal incontinence-functional magnetic stimulationPelvic floor muscles and rectus abdominis muscle and erector spinae muscle0.6 KPa (Wang et al., 2024b; Song et al., 2012; )ARA
7Exercise training for urinary incontinence-hip muscle exercisesPelvic floor muscles and hip muscles0.6 KPa (Wang et al., 2024b; Song et al., 2012; )RVA
8Exercise training for urinary incontinence-suspension exercise trainingPelvic floor muscles and rectus abdominis muscle and hip muscles and erector spinae muscle0.6 KPa (Wang et al., 2024b; Song et al., 2012; )RVA

Simulation plans table.

3 Results

3.1 3D finite element model establishment

This study successfully constructed a finite element model of the pelvic floor muscles and the hip, abdominal, and back muscle groups related to urinary and fecal functions in elderly women. The final 3D pelvic-thigh model of elderly women includes 43 structures. Figure 2 is an annotation diagram of different muscle positions of the modeling.

FIGURE 2

3.2 Mesh independence and deformation analysis

The total deformation distribution maps under two different mesh densities show that the deformation patterns of the two models are consistent. The maximum total deformation for the original mesh (100%) model was 0.6459 mm, while the maximum total deformation for the refined mesh (130%) model was 0.6269 mm (Supplementary File 1). The relative change between the two was 3.03%, which is less than 5%, indicating that the mesh refinement has a minimal effect on the overall deformation results. The results are not sensitive to mesh density, and the model demonstrates good mesh independence. Therefore, for subsequent calculations, the original mesh model (100%) before refinement will be used as the standard mesh to balance computational accuracy and efficiency.

Figure 3 illustrates the mesh division of the 3D finite element model, comprising 69,635 nodes and 148,161 elements. A hybrid meshing strategy was applied to the composite model using both tetrahedral and hexahedral elements, which optimizes simulation efficiency without compromising anatomical fidelity. This mesh layout ensured accurate force transmission across the integrated pelvic-thigh model and facilitated subsequent load simulations under different rehabilitation scenarios.

FIGURE 3

3.3 Verification of 3D finite element model

Figure 4 illustrates the validation of the model through dynamic MRI measurements during the Valsalva maneuver. These images demonstrate the anatomical changes induced by intra-abdominal pressure and provide quantitative references for validating the simulation model’s accuracy. Assessments of using data obtained from dynamic MRI of pelvic floor changes along the midsagittal plane in model during the Valsalva maneuver showed that the relative changes in abdominal waistline and the differences in RVA and ARA were within 8.28% (Table 4).

FIGURE 4

TABLE 4

Validation indicatorsMeasurement resultsDifference percentage
Dynamic MRI3D model
WaistlineBefore Valsalva138.20 mm135.81 mm1.73%
After Valsalva155.75 mm142.85 mm8.28%
RVABefore Valsalva142.01°140.80°0.85%
After Valsalva163.30°162.62°0.42%
ARABefore Valsalva115.98°116.32°0.29%
After Valsalva132.28°132.75°0.36%

Comparison of dynamic MRI and 3D model measurement results.

3.4 Finite element analysis results of simulation plans

Table 5 shows the specific numerical changes in ARA and RVA as the material properties vary under different muscle combinations in the simulations of urinary and defecation dysfunction. Figures 5, 6 illustrate the trend of changes in ARA and RVA with varying material properties for different muscle combinations. Furthermore, as the material properties increase from 0.05 times to 2 times baseline, although the curves fluctuate, ARA shows an overall upward trend with a range of 147°∼157°, and RVA shows an overall downward trend with a range of 124°∼135°. Figures 7, 8 show the absolute changes in ARA and RVA under different conditions of simulated constipation, fecal incontinence, and urinary incontinence rehabilitation. Based on our previous research on elderly men (Wang et al., 2024b), we compared the order of muscles that benefit from rehabilitation training for urinary and defecation dysfunction in elderly men and elderly women (Table 6).

TABLE 5

Conditions No.MusclesAngleTypes of urinary and defecation dysfunctionMultiple of material propertiesChanges in material properties
0.05 times0.25 times0.50 times0.75 times1.00 times1.25 times1.50 times1.75 times2.00 timesFrom 1 times to 0.05 timesFrom 1 times to 2 times
No.1External anal sphincterARAFecal incontinence148.85149.2147.93148149.2149.71150.38150.79151.250.352.05
No.2Levator ani muscleARAConstipation, fecal incontinence149.28149.77150.29150.8151.28151.54152.42152.49153.9122.63
No.4Levator ani muscle and external anal sphincterARAConstipation149.52149.88150.11150.87151.5151.68152.49153.29154.071.982.57
No.5Pelvic floor musclesARAConstipation, fecal incontinence151.37151.93152.58152.79153.08153.62153.32154.62156.641.713.56
No.6Pelvic floor muscles and rectus abdominis muscle and erector spinae muscleARAFecal incontinence149.87151.04151.84152.39153.17153.77153153.63154.623.31.45
No.2Levator ani muscleRVAUrinary incontinence130.81130.26129.71129.16128.61128.05127.51126.95126.752.21.86
No.3Levator ani muscle and urethral sphincterRVAUrinary incontinence133.28132.63131.98131.33130.67130.02129.84129.41128.672.612
No.5Pelvic floor musclesRVAUrinary incontinence130.93130.2129.47128.74128.03127.32127.05126.86125.712.92.32
No.7Pelvic floor muscles and hip musclesRVAUrinary incontinence135.42134.4133.34132.19131.16130.04129.13128.66128.094.263.07
No.8Pelvic floor muscles and rectus abdominis muscle and hip muscles and erector spinae muscleRVAUrinary incontinence129.36128.85128.35127.84127.33126.82126.31125.88124.692.032.64

Numerical table of ARA changes with material properties.

FIGURE 5

FIGURE 6

FIGURE 7

FIGURE 8

TABLE 6

Urinary and defecation dysfunctionGenderMaterial propertiesThe muscle prioritization for rehabilitation training
ConstipationElderly menFrom 1 times to 0.5 timesLevator ani muscle
From 1 times to 2 timesLevator ani muscle + external anal sphincter
Elderly womenFrom 1 times to 0.5 timesLevator ani muscle
From 1 times to 2 timesPelvic floor muscles
Fecal incontinenceElderly menFrom 1 times to 0.5 timesLevator ani muscle
From 1 times to 2 timesExternal anal sphincter
Elderly womenFrom 1 times to 0.5 timesPelvic floor muscles + rectus abdominis muscle+erector spinae muscle
From 1 times to 2 timesPelvic floor muscles
Urinary incontinenceElderly menFrom 1 times to 0.5 timesLevator ani muscle
From 1 times to 2 timesPelvic floor muscles
Elderly womenFrom 1 times to 0.5 timesPelvic floor muscles+hip muscles
From 1 times to 2 timesPelvic floor muscles+hip muscles

Comparison of the muscle prioritization of rehabilitation training for urinary and defecation dysfunction between elderly men and women.

4 Discussion

The study targets a highly relevant issue in elderly women—urinary and fecal dysfunction—and proposes personalized rehabilitation guidance using biomechanical modeling. Compared with previous studies that focused solely on pelvic floor muscles, this research firstly developed a comprehensive 3D pelvic-thigh model in elderly women. The findings highlight the critical role of integrating muscle groups beyond the pelvic floor, including the abdominal, hip, and back muscles, in maintaining control of urination and defecation and achieving functional recovery. This comprehensive approach enhances the practical relevance of the study.

In constructing the present model, a healthy elderly female dataset was deliberately selected to provide a geometrically intact baseline for biomechanical simulation. In this study, the elastic modulus of muscles was proportionally adjusted to approximate rehabilitation-induced adaptations within a finite element framework. Studies have shown that the elastic modulus is associated with neuromuscular control (; Wolff et al., 2020), and rehabilitation training not only alters the active contractile capacity of muscles but also induces passive mechanical changes, which can be observed at both the single-fiber and fiber-bundle levels (; ). In addition, oportional modulation of material parameters has also been adopted in previous FEA studies (), supporting its feasibility as an exploratory strategy.

The model extends beyond traditional pelvic floor simulations because it was constructed based on data from dynamic MRI, CT, and static MRI data, and its accuracy was validated through geometric comparison with key anatomical landmarks, including the waistline, RVA, and ARA. While the model showed good geometric agreement with key pelvic floor anatomical structures, the observed waistline variation of 8.28% was slightly higher than anticipated. This discrepancy can be attributed to the complex nature of soft tissue deformation, which may explain the larger variation observed in waist circumference compared to ARA and RVA. The resulting model showed good geometric agreement with key pelvic floor anatomical structures in a representative elderly female, supporting its preliminary applicability in simulating pelvic biomechanics. These findings suggest potential utility for understanding mechanisms underlying urinary and fecal control, although broader validation is needed.

The study employed RVA and ARA as the sole indicators for assessing urinary and fecal control. At rest, the puborectalis muscle continuously pulls the rectum forward to maintain an appropriate ARA (Zhou and Lai, 2021), which generally ranges from 90° to 127°, and normally increases to 120°∼152.4°during defecation (Zhou and Lai, 2021; ; ). Failure of the ARA to increase, or paradoxical narrowing during defecation, indicates pelvic floor muscle relaxation, loss of tone, or impaired coordination. Conversely, when weakening of the puborectalis muscle leads to an ARA exceeding the normal range, fecal incontinence may occur, often associated with reduced pelvic floor activity or pudendal nerve injury (). RVA reflects the integrity of bladder neck closure, with a normal resting range of 90°∼120° (). In pelvic floor dysfunction, the RVA may abnormally widen to 160°∼180°during straining (), and in patients with stress urinary incontinence, the RVA often exceeds 140° (), suggesting decreased urethral closure pressure and impaired urinary continence. The results showed that as the muscle material coefficients gradually increased from 0.05 times to 1 times or decreased from 2times to 1 times, both RVA and ARA values progressively approached the normal range. These biomechanical changes suggest a potential mechanism whereby targeted reinforcement of the pelvic floor, abdominal, hip, and back muscles through rehabilitation interventions may enhance pelvic floor functional capacity and thereby improve urinary and fecal dysfunction.

While RVA and ARA are significant imaging biomarkers, urinary and defecation dysfunction are complex clinical symptoms whose severity is closely linked to patient subjective experience, quality of life, and neural control. Alterations in these two parameters alone do not fully capture the comprehensive clinical functional enhancement. In this study, RVA and ARA served as the primary outcome measures because they are the most readily quantifiable biomechanical indicators within the finite element modeling framework. Thus RVA and ARA should be interpreted as surrogate biomechanical markers rather than comprehensive clinical endpoints.

For the first time, this study provides preliminary evidence on the potential muscle prioritization of pelvic floor rehabilitation benefits for elderly women. For constipation management, computational findings suggest that rehabilitation targeting the levator ani muscle might be prioritized when muscle properties fall below baseline levels (1 time), while cases with above-baseline muscle properties may benefit more from comprehensive pelvic floor muscle engagement. Regarding fecal incontinence, sub-baseline muscle conditions suggest the need for integrated training targeting pelvic floor muscles along with rectus abdominis, and erector spinae muscles, whereas supra-baseline conditions may warrant concentrated pelvic floor muscle rehabilitation. For urinary incontinence cases, combined pelvic-hip muscles rehabilitation appears advantageous regardless of baseline muscle status. These observed associations between muscle material coefficients and rehabilitation outcomes highlight the importance of condition-specific muscle prioritization in elderly women’s pelvic rehabilitation, these findings may contribute to the development of more tailored rehabilitation nursing recommendations. It should be emphasized that our interpretation focused on the general trends observed when material properties were below or above baseline, rather than the extreme values of parameter variation. The broader range (0.05–2.0) was applied primarily to test model robustness, while clinical rehabilitation is unlikely to reach such extremes.

Recent clinical research by demonstrated that hip exercises alone, as well as combined abdominal, hip, and pelvic floor muscles training, significantly enhance pelvic floor muscle activity. This may be attributed to the synergistic contractions induced by adductor and gluteal muscle engagement, which facilitate the co-contraction of pelvic floor muscles and the striated urethral sphincter, thereby strengthening pelvic floor muscles contraction and improving neuromuscular control (). These findings are consistent with our simulation-based results, which suggest that pelvic floor-hip combined training may offer more comprehensive benefits for elderly women with urinary incontinence. In contrast, clinical and imaging studies directly addressing the prioritization of specific muscle groups in constipation and fecal incontinence rehabilitation are limited. Currently, research on pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) for elderly women primarily focuses on the overall efficacy of PFMT, rather than the sequence or prioritization of individual muscle group interventions. As such, direct clinical comparisons with the prioritization patterns observed in our simulations remain exploratory.

Compared to our previous findings (Wang et al., 2024b), there were notable differences in the key muscles for rehabilitation of urinary and defecation dysfunction between elderly men and women. In elderly men, the levator ani muscle and external anal sphincter are the critical muscles for improving defecation dysfunction. In contrast, for elderly women, the levator ani, pelvic floor, rectus abdominis, and erector spinae muscles play more significant roles in improving defecation dysfunction. In terms of urinary incontinence, for elderly men, training should primarily focus on the levator ani and pelvic floor muscles, while for women, combined training of the pelvic floor muscles and hip muscles, or a comprehensive approach targeting the pelvic floor muscles, rectus abdominis muscle, hip muscles, and erector spinae muscle, is more effective in restoring urinary control. Specifically, rehabilitation training for urinary and defecation dysfunction in elderly men focuses on strengthening localized muscles, such as the levator ani muscle and external anal sphincter, and the benefits of such interventions are concentrated on localized improvements in the core muscle groups. In contrast, rehabilitation training for elderly women emphasizes the synergistic action of multiple muscle groups, focusing on overall functional recovery. Compared to their male counterparts, the neuromuscular system in elderly women undergoes more severe degeneration (Stalling et al., 2024). The decline in estrogen levels leads to a reduction in neuromuscular function in postmenopausal women, negatively affecting muscle coordination (Willoughby et al., 2024; ). Studies have shown that while elderly men tend to exhibit greater muscle size, strength, and functional performance, elderly women demonstrate a smaller cross-sectional area of the lateral thigh muscle, lower knee extensor torque, and poorer force steadiness in muscles around the hip joint (Guo et al., 2023). Anatomically, the pelvic floor muscles in women are more vulnerable, as they are heavily influenced by pregnancy and childbirth. Therefore, rehabilitation training for elderly women requires special attention to synergistic training of the muscles of the pelvic floor, abdomen, hip, and back, ensuring a comprehensive approach to improve their functionality.

These findings suggest that sex-based differences may influence muscle prioritization in pelvic floor rehabilitation, underscoring the value of further investigation into gender-specific rehabilitation strategies. Clinical phenomena also confirm that gender differences lead to different types of diseases in patients. In clinical practice, elderly men are more prone to defecatory dyssynergia, whereas women are more likely to experience insufficient defecatory propulsion (). Women are also more susceptible to stress urinary incontinence, while men more commonly present with urge urinary incontinence (). proposed in 2007 that sex-based issues should be considered in cardiac rehabilitation, recommending customizing programs specifically for women with ischemic heart disease. Similarly, the anatomical and functional differences between men and women must be fully considered to provide more targeted rehabilitation plans for elderly patients urinary and defecation dysfunction, ultimately enhancing quality of life and functional recovery.

While this computational evidence provides mechanistic insights, validating the proposed muscle prioritization strategies in real-world settings through controlled clinical trials is essential. Shear wave elastography (SWE), an ultrasound-based elastography technique that measures tissue elasticity modulus by generating shear waves within the tissue via external or internal forces and analyzing their propagation speed (). With a penetration depth exceeding 8 cm (), SWE provides critical technical support for identifying muscle fibrosis, damage, or excessive laxity, especially in deep pelvic structures. It is non-invasive, repeatable, and has shown potential in evaluating muscle stiffness and contractility in the levator ani (Xie et al., 2015), puborectalis (Wang et al., 2017), and other pelvic floor muscles (Okada et al., 2001; Tang et al., 2020). Studies suggest that SWE can guide early pelvic floor muscle training and monitor rehabilitation outcomes (Zhou M. et al., 2020; ; ; ). Future research should employ SWE to quantitatively assess the elastic modulus of pelvic floor-related muscles in patients with urinary and fecal dysfunction. Building on the muscle prioritization trends observed in our model, future research may explore constructing personalized rehabilitation protocols that consider individual muscle characteristics, sex differences, and dysfunction types. Subsequently, the effectiveness of these protocols will be evaluated using functional outcomes such as reduction in urinary and fecal dysfunction symptoms, ARA, RVA, and quality of life. This two-stage validation—biomechanical characterization followed by targeted intervention—will help bridge the gap between simulation results and clinical application.

Striking an appropriate balance between model fidelity and practical feasibility remains a critical and ongoing challenge (). It is important to acknowledge certain limitations of this study. First, in this study, muscle elastic modulus was linearly scaled to represent rehabilitation-induced functional improvement. This approach, while a common simplification in finite element modeling, primarily reflects changes in passive stiffness rather than improvements in active contraction capacity or neuromuscular coordination. As such, our method more closely simulates muscle dynamic alterations such as fibrosis than genuine training-induced strengthening.

In reality, rehabilitation induces complex bioadaptive processes that include neuromuscular control, motor unit recruitment, muscle fiber type conversion, and myofascial coordination, which cannot be fully represented by a single parameter such as passive stiffness. Therefore, our finite element results should be interpreted as reflecting the structural potential of muscle strengthening, rather than capturing the entire spectrum of functional adaptations. Future studies combining finite element modeling with electrophysiological measurements and clinical outcomes are needed to provide a more comprehensive understanding.

Second, the boundary conditions were idealized, with bones being modeled as completely fixed, rigid bodies and intra-abdominal pressure assumed to be uniformly distributed. Compared with soft tissues, the elastic modulus of bone is much higher, and thus its deformation can be considered negligible relative to that of soft tissues. Therefore, bone was simplified as a rigid body in this study. Furthermore, our dynamic MRI measurements indicated that bone displacement during rehabilitation training was minimal, and accordingly, the bones were simplified as fully fixed. In vivo, however, pelvic floor mechanics involve micro-articulations, pressure vessel effects, and holistic load transmission. In future work, we plan to incorporate such dynamic interactions to improve the accuracy of the computational model.

Third, although the constructed model provides valuable biomechanical insights, the modeling was based on a single elderly female participant, which inevitably limits the generalizability of the findings. BMI, individual anatomical differences, and tissue properties may alter biomechanical outcomes. To improve generalizability and clinical applicability, future studies should involve multidisciplinary collaboration to develop multi-subject models incorporating diverse anatomical and clinical characteristics.

Fourth, material properties were varied linearly from 0.05 to 2.0 times baseline to represent functional impairment and enhancement. The analysis primarily contrasted sub-baseline (<1.0) and supra-baseline (>1.0) conditions to describe directional trends, rather than drawing predictions from the extreme ends of the range. Nevertheless, the assumption of linear extrapolation across such a wide interval does not fully reflect biological reality, since muscle performance usually operates within an optimal functional range. Therefore, results at extreme values should be regarded as theoretical boundaries.

The findings of this study are primarily theoretical recommendations derived from computational simulations without clinical validation, direct clinical implementation of its findings risks premature translation. Future research should involve designing studies to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of these muscle prioritization in real-world elderly population. We are currently conducting a larger-scale SWE-based clinical validation to bridge simulation with real-world applications. Despite these limitations, the present model provides novel mechanistic insights into the interplay of pelvic and extra-pelvic muscles in continence control. This study represents the first attempt to integrate pelvic floor, abdominal, hip, and back muscles into a unified model for elderly women, providing valuable biomechanical insights and a foundation for precision rehabilitation and AI-driven prescription systemsin pelvic floor care.

5 Conclusion

The study developed a 3D finite element model that is highly consistent with the actual pelvic floor conditions of an elderly woman and validated its effectiveness using dynamic MRI data. By employing FEA, this study delved into the mechanisms underlying the enhancement of urinary and defecation control in the elderly women and identified the differing muscle prioritization for rehabilitation training in elderly men and women. These findings facilitate the personalized recommendation of pelvic floor rehabilitation plans tailored to the muscle condition and dysfunction type of elderly women. The current simplified model was developed from a single elderly female subject, which limits its generalizability. Therefore, it is imperative that future work should focus on developing multi-subject and multi-sample models that account for anatomical and physiological variability. Additionally, clinical validation trials should be undertaken to ensure the broader applicability of rehabilitation strategies.

Statements

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by Relevant ethical approval was obtained from Capital Medical University (ethics approval numbers: Lin Yan Shen [2023] 079 and Z2024SY007) and the study has been registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Center (ChiCTR2400080749). The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Author contributions

RW: Data curation, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. GL: Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review and editing. LJ: Funding acquisition, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review and editing. TZ: Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing – review and editing. XQ: Formal Analysis, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review and editing.

Funding

The authors declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This study is supported by the National Key R&D (research and development) Program of China (grant 2022YFB4703300). Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of National Key R&D Program of China.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our sincere gratitude to Ying Zhu (Peking University First Hospital), Chunxue Wu (Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University), Prof. Zhiyong Zhang (North China University of Science and Technology), and Zixin Wang (Dalian University of Technology) for their valuable guidance and constructive suggestions throughout this research. We also sincerely thank Nanjing Medlander Medical Technology Co., Ltd. for their strong support of this work.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The authors declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2025.1663545/full#supplementary-material

Abbreviations

FEA, finite element analysis; RVA, retrovesical angle; ARA, anorectal angulation; SWE, shear wave elastography; EMG, electromyography; PFMT, pelvic floor muscle training.

References

  • 1

    AbeT.KunimotoM.HachiroY.OtaS.OharaK.InagakiM.et al (2023). Are there sex differences in defecation patterns in patients with defecation disorders? - a single-center observational study. J. Anus Rectum Colon7 (3), 150–158. 10.23922/jarc.2022-078

  • 2

    AljuraifaniR.StaffordR. E.HugF.HodgesP. W. (2018). Female striated urogenital sphincter contraction measured by shear wave elastography during pelvic floor muscle activation: proof of concept and validation. Neurourol. Urodyn.37 (1), 206–212. 10.1002/nau.23275

  • 3

    AlouiniS.MemicS.CouillandreA. (2022). Pelvic floor muscle training for urinary incontinence with or without biofeedback or electrostimulation in women: a systematic review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health19 (5), 2789. 10.3390/ijerph19052789

  • 4

    BaiC.WangL. Q.ZhangP. F.LiQ.ChenR.LiS. Y.et al (2022). A preliminary study on the application of ultrasound shear wave elastography to assess the puborectalis muscle in healthy adults. Chin. J. Ultrasound Med.38 (5), 566–569. 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0101.2022.05.024

  • 5

    BhattaraiA.StaatM. (2018). Modelling of soft connective tissues to investigate female pelvic floor dysfunctions. Comput. Math. Methods Med.2018, 9518076. 10.1155/2018/9518076

  • 6

    Bjarnason-WehrensB.GrandeG.LoewelH.VöllerH.MittagO. (2007). Gender-specific issues in cardiac rehabilitation: do women with ischaemic heart disease need specially tailored programmes?Eur. J. Cardiovasc Prev. Rehabil.14 (2), 163–171. 10.1097/HJR.0b013e3280128bce

  • 7

    BoubakerM. B.HaboussiM.GanghofferJ. F.AlettiP. (2009). Finite element simulation of interactions between pelvic organs: predictive model of the prostate motion in the context of radiotherapy. J. Biomech.42 (12), 1862–1868. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.05.022

  • 8

    BrandãoS.ParenteM.MascarenhasT.da SilvaA. R. G.RamosI.JorgeR. N. (2015). Biomechanical study on the bladder neck and urethral positions: simulation of impairment of the pelvic ligaments. J. Biomech.48 (2), 217–223. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.11.045

  • 9

    BruscianoL.GambardellaC.GualtieriG.TerraccianoG.ToloneS.Schiano di VisconteM.et al (2020). Effects of extracorporeal magnetic stimulation in fecal incontinence. Open Med. (Wars)15, 57–64. 10.1515/med-2020-0009

  • 10

    ChantereauP.BrieuM.KammalM.FarthmannJ.GabrielB.CossonM. (2014). Mechanical properties of pelvic soft tissue of young women and impact of aging. Int. Urogynecol J.25 (11), 1547–1553. 10.1007/s00192-014-2439-1

  • 11

    ChenQ. Q. (2014). A finite element studies of the different functions for the ligaments of the uterus in maintaining uterine in the normal position. Shanghai: Fudan University.

  • 12

    ChenW.YanZ.WuL. (2010). Finite element analysis of female pelvic floor anal elevator muscle. Chin. J. Tissue Eng. Res. Clin. Rehab14 (43), 8125–8128. 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8225.2010.43.036

  • 13

    ChenW.WuL. J.YanZ. H.WangJ. S.FuY. L.ChenX. F.et al (2011). The establishment and meaning of the three-dimensional finite element model of pelvic floor levator ani muscle in an old healthy woman. J. Biomed. Eng.28 (05), 927–931. Available online at: https://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/periodical/CiFQZXJpb2RpY2FsQ0hJU29scjlTMjAyNTEwMjEwOTUwNDYSEHN3eXhnY3gyMDExMDUwMTUaCGVkb2tva3Vj.

  • 14

    ChenZ. W.JoliP.FengZ. Q.RahimM.PirróN.BellemareM. E. (2015). Female patient-specific finite element modeling of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). J. Biomech.48 (2), 238–245. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.11.039

  • 15

    CrezeM.NordezA.SoubeyrandM.RocherL.MaîtreX.BellinM. F. (2018). Shear wave sonoelastography of skeletal muscle: basic principles, biomechanical concepts, clinical applications, and future perspectives. Skelet. Radiol.47 (4), 457–471. 10.1007/s00256-017-2843-y

  • 16

    DaviesA.LeachC.CaponeroR.DickmanA.FuchsD.PaiceJ.et al (2020). MASCC recommendations on the management of constipation in patients with advanced cancer. Support Care Cancer28 (1), 23–33. 10.1007/s00520-019-05016-4

  • 17

    de SousaA. M. M.CavalcanteJ. G. T.BottaroM.VieiraD. C. L.BabaultN.GeremiaJ. M.et al (2023). The influence of hip and knee joint angles on quadriceps muscle-tendon unit properties during maximal voluntary isometric contraction. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health20 (5), 3947. 10.3390/ijerph20053947

  • 18

    DiasN.PengY.KhavariR.NakibN. A.SweetR. M.TimmG. W.et al (2017). Pelvic floor dynamics during high-impact athletic activities: a computational modeling study. Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon)41, 20–27. 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2016.11.003

  • 19

    DicksonD. M.SmithS. L.HendryG. J. (2024). Association between quadriceps tendon elasticity and neuromuscular control in individuals with knee osteoarthritis. Clin. Biomech. (Bristol)111, 106159. 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2023.106159

  • 20

    ElmalıK. S.Irmak SapmazH.Yılmaz SağlamS. (2024). Examination of the anorectal angle and pubococcygeal line in adults with anal disorders and defecation irregularities using magnetic resonance imaging. J. Clin. Pract. Res.46 (3), 224–233. 10.14744/cpr.2024.57286

  • 21

    ElfatahE. E. A.ElAzabD. R.HanouraE. M.Eman M Othman (2023). Effect of six weeks of whole-body vibration in treatment of postnatal constipation. J. Pak Med. Assoc.73 (Suppl. 4), S13–S16. 10.47391/JPMA.EGY-S4-3

  • 22

    FieldingJ. R.DumanliH.SchreyerA. G.OkudaS.GeringD. T.ZouK. H.et al (2000). MR-based threedimentional modeling of the normal pelvic floor. AJR174 (3), 567–660. 10.2214/ajr.174.3.1740657

  • 23

    FrulioN.TrillaudH. (2013). Ultrasound elastography in liver. Diagnostic interventional imaging94 (5), 515–534. 10.1016/j.diii.2013.02.005

  • 24

    GordonM. T.DeLanceyJ. O. L.RenfroeA.BattlesA.ChenL. (2019). Development of anatomically based customizable three-dimensional finite-element model of pelvic floor support system: POP-SIM1.0. Interface Focus9 (4), 20190022. 10.1098/rsfs.2019.0022

  • 25

    GuoE. F.MaL.KanY. M.ZhangS. H.SunM.LiuY.et al (2015). The application value of transperineal ultrasound in female stress urinary incontinence. Chin. J. Clin. Med. Imaging26 (03), 197–199.

  • 26

    GuoP. N.ZhangZ. Y.GaoY. (2019). Design and finite element analysis of customized pelvic prosthesis. China J. Orthop. traumatology32 (06), 564–568. 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2019.06.016

  • 27

    GuoY. X.EleanorJ. J.ThomasF. S.AbdulmajeedA.NishadiG.DanielW. S.et al (2023). Sex disparities in age-related neuromuscular decline: unveiling female susceptibility from early to late elderly. bioRxiv. 10.1101/2023.06.13.544761

  • 28

    HeJ. L. (2016). Anatomy studies and finite element analysis for unstable posterior pelvic ring di sruptions treated with tension band pIate. Shandong University. 10.7666/d.Y3037037

  • 29

    HenningerH. B.ReeseS. P.AndersonA. E.WeissJ. A. (2010). Validation of computational models in biomechanics. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. H.224 (7), 801–812. 10.1243/09544119JEIM649

  • 30

    HöderA.StenbeckJ.FernandoM.LangeE. (2023). Pelvic floor muscle training with biofeedback or feedback from a physiotherapist for urinary and anal incontinence after childbirth - a systematic review. BMC Womens Health23 (1), 618. 10.1186/s12905-023-02765-7

  • 31

    HuJ. C.DingY. Q.PangH. Y.YuC. Q.SunD. J. Y.PeiP.et al (2024). Prevalence of urinary incontinence in middle-aged and elderly adults in 10 areas in China. Chin. J. Epidemiol.45 (1), 11–18. 10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20230910-00144

  • 32

    HuangT. T.YangS. D.TsaiY. H.ChinY. F.WangB. H.TsayP. K. (2015). Effectiveness of individualised intervention on older residents with constipation in nursing home: a randomised controlled trial. J. Clin. Nurs.24 (2324), 3449–3458. 10.1111/jocn.12974

  • 33

    JiangX. Y.PanY. S.PanH. G.RuanJ.QinL.GuanY. Q.et al (2019). Effect of vaginal delivery on postpartum elasticity and contractile function of puborectalis in primiparas. Guangxi Med. J.41 (10), 1231–1233. 10.11675/j.issn.0253-4304.2019.10.07

  • 34

    JinQ.ZhuY.YinP.LiX. (2023). Tibial nerve electrical stimulation for fecal incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Updat. Surg.75 (5), 1059–1070. 10.1007/s13304-022-01444-w

  • 35

    KawamaR.TakahashiK.IkifuneH.TozawaH.ObataT.ItoR.et al (2024). Can eccentric-only resistance training decrease passive muscle stiffness while increasing size and strength of hamstrings?Med. Sci. Sports Exerc56 (12), 2349–2361. 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003516

  • 36

    KobiM.FlusbergM.ParoderV.ChernyakV. (2018). Practical guide to dynamic pelvic floor MRI. J. Magn. Reson Imaging47 (5), 1155–1170. 10.1002/jmri.25998

  • 37

    KorkmazI.RoggB. (2007). A simple fluid-mechanical model for the prediction of the stress-strain relation of the Male urinary bladder. J. Biomech.40 (3), 663–668. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.02.014

  • 38

    KrcmarM.KroftaL.UrbankovaI.ReislJ. F.HavelkovaL.HyncikL. (2015). Biomechanical properties of levator ani muscle used for virtual model of pelvic floor. Int. Urogynecology J., s163–s164.

  • 39

    LeeS. L.DarziA.YangG. Z. (2005). Subject specific finite element modelling of the levator ani. Med. Image Comput. Assist. Interv.8 (Ptl), 360–367. 10.1007/11566465_45

  • 40

    LevaillantM.VenaraA.DamonH.SiproudhisL.BrochardC.HamelJ. F. (2023). Young women and elderly men at risk of severe faecal incontinence: results of a French nationwide database analysis: faecal incontinence in France. Int. J. Colorectal Dis.38 (1), 131. 10.1007/s00384-023-04431-8

  • 41

    LiQ. (2017). Technology progress of ultrasound elastography based on shear wave. China Med. Devices32 (07), 101–105+123. 10.3969/j.issn.1674-1633.2017.07.028

  • 42

    LiS. (2022). Computer simulation biomechanical research based on magnetic resonance imaging of female pelvic organ prolapse. Kunming Medical University. 10.27202/d.cnki.gkmyc.2022.000772

  • 43

    LiJ. Q.YanH. F. (2015). Clinical exploration of ultrasound measurement of bladder neck mobility and posterior angle of bladder urethra in the diagnosis of stress urinary incontinence in middle-aged and elderly women. J. Chang. Med. Coll.29 (04), 287–289. 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0588.2015.04.018

  • 44

    LiH. Y.CuiZ. Y.CuiS. H.et al (2017). Development and validation of a finite element model for a 6-year-old child pelvis. Chin. J. Automot. Eng.7 (2), 100–105. 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1469.2017.02.04

  • 45

    LiuX. (2017). Finite element modeling of pelvic floor muscles in female patients with moderate to severe stress urinary incontinence and simulation stress analysis of storage and leakage state. Shanxi Medical University.

  • 46

    LiuF. F.XuL.YingT.TaoJ. J.HuB. (2013). The value of perineal ultrasound in the diagnosis of anterior pelvic dysfunction in women. Chin. J. Ultrasound Imaging .22 (12), 1063–1066. 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4477.2013.12.016

  • 47

    LiuX.RongQ.LiuY.WangJ.XieB.RenS. (2022). Relationship between high intra-abdominal pressure and compliance of the pelvic floor support system in women without pelvic organ prolapse: a finite element analysis. Front. Med. (Lausanne)9, 820016. 10.3389/fmed.2022.820016

  • 48

    MaZ. J. (2019). Study on the mechanism of pelvic vascular injury by lateral impact. Nanjing Medical University. 10.27249/d.cnki.gnjyu.2019.000006

  • 49

    MaX. B.ChenC. X. (2020). The defecation status and its impact on physical and mental health of elderly people. Chin. J. Gerontology40 (18), 3983–3986. 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9202.2020.18.053

  • 50

    MarquesS. A. A.SrbdS.PássaroA. C.HaddadJ. M.BaracatE. C.FerreiraE. A. G. (2020). Effect of pelvic floor and hip muscle strengthening in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: a randomized clinical trial. J. Manip. Physiol. Ther.43 (3), 247–256. 10.1016/j.jmpt.2019.01.007

  • 51

    Mazur-BialyA. I.Kołomańska-BoguckaD.NowakowskiC.TimS. (2020). Urinary incontinence in women: modern methods of physiotherapy as a support for surgical treatment or independent therapy. J. Clin. Med.9 (4), 1211. 10.3390/jcm9041211

  • 52

    MorinM.SalomoniS. E.StaffordR. E.HallL. M.HodgesP. W. (2022). Validation of shear wave elastography as a noninvasive measure of pelvic floor muscle stiffness. Neurourol. Urodyn.41 (7), 1620–1628. 10.1002/nau.25010

  • 53

    MoseleyT.HicksA. J.Cosgriff-HernandezE. M.RauschM. K.HakimJ. (2025). Finite element modeling in obstetrics and gynecology: advances, applications, and challenges. Front. Med. (Lausanne)12, 1606989. 10.3389/fmed.2025.1606989

  • 54

    MR Group (2022). Radiology branch, Chinese medical association MRI technology and reporting standards for female pelvic floor dysfunction diseases. Chin. J. Radiology56 (1), 16–24. 10.3760/cma.j.cn112149-20210426-00412

  • 55

    NiuW.ShiT. M.ZhangY. X. (2018). Quantitative evaluation on puborectalis function in patients with pelvic organ prolapse using shear wave elastography. Chin. J. Med. Imaging Technol.34 (2), 270–274. 10.13929/j.1003-3289.201704122

  • 56

    NoonanA. M.MashouriP.ChenJ.PowerG. A.BrownS. H. M. (2020). Training induced changes to skeletal muscle passive properties are evident in both single fibers and fiber bundles in the rat hindlimb. Front. Physiol.11, 907. 10.3389/fphys.2020.00907

  • 57

    Notenboom-NasF. J. M.Knol-de VriesG. E.Slieker-Ten HoveM. C. P.DekkerJ. H.KeukenD. G.van KoeveringeG. A.et al (2023). Comparing Male and female pelvic floor muscle function by the number and type of pelvic floor symptoms. Neurourol. Urodyn.42 (4), 875–885. 10.1002/nau.25149

  • 58

    O'BryanS. J.CritchlowA.FuchsC. J.HiamD.LamonS. (2025). The contribution of age and sex hormones to female neuromuscular function across the adult lifespan. J. Physiol. 10.1113/JP287496

  • 59

    OefnerC.HerrmannS.KebbachM.LangeH. E.KluessD.WoiczinskiM. (2021). Reporting checklist for verification and validation of finite element analysis in orthopedic and trauma biomechanics. Med. Eng. Phys.92, 25–32. 10.1016/j.medengphy.2021.03.011

  • 60

    OjukwuC. P.OjukwuC. S.OkemuoA. J.IgweS. E.DrEdeS. S.EzeigweA. U.et al (2022). Comparative effects of selected abdominal and lower limb exercises in the recruitment of the pelvic floor muscles: determining adjuncts to Kegel's exercises. J. Bodyw. Mov. Ther.29, 180–186. 10.1016/j.jbmt.2021.09.009

  • 61

    OkadaY.NakagawaC.ShigetaM.NomuraY.InoueE.IchizukaK.et al (2001)2024). Evaluation of levator ani muscle elasticity after vaginal delivery and cesarean section using shear wave elastography. J. Med. Ultrason.51 (1), 95–101. 10.1007/s10396-023-01369-w

  • 62

    PengY.KhavariR.NakibN. A.BooneT. B.ZhangY. (2016). Assessment of urethral support using MRI-derived computational modeling of the female pelvis. Int. Urogynecol J.27 (2), 205–212. 10.1007/s00192-015-2804-8

  • 63

    PintoC.F.C.SOliveiraP.D.C.MFernandesO.M.F.S.OPadilhaJ. M. D. S. C.MachadoP. A. P.RibeiroA. L. A.et al (2020). Nonpharmacological clinical effective interventions in constipation: a systematic review. J. Nurs. Scholarsh.52 (3), 261–269. 10.1111/jnu.12555

  • 64

    PisarciucC.DanI.CioarăR. (2023). The influence of mesh density on the results obtained by finite element analysis of complex bodies. Mater. (Basel)16 (7), 2555. 10.3390/ma16072555

  • 65

    QiuZ. Y. (2017). Finite element analysis and mechanical mechanism of posterior vaginal prolapsed based on MR imaging. Fujian Medical University. 10.27020/d.cnki.gfjyu.2017.000067

  • 66

    RaoG. V.RubodC.BrieuM.BhatnagarN.CossonN. (2010). Experiments and FE modeling for the study of prolapsed in the pelvic system. Comp. Meth Biomech. Biomed. Eng.13 (3), 349–357. 10.1080/10255840903251270

  • 67

    RenS.XieB.WangJ.RongQ. (2015). Three-dimensional modeling of the pelvic floor support systems of subjects with and without pelvic organ prolapse. Biomed. Res. Int.2015, 845985. 10.1155/2015/845985

  • 68

    RicciP. L.MaasS.KelmJ.GerichT. (2018). Finite element analysis of the pelvis including gait muscle forces: an investigation into the effect of rami fractures on load transmission. J. Exp. Orthop.5 (1), 33. 10.1186/s40634-018-0151-7

  • 69

    SalariN.GhasemianradM.Ammari-AllahyariM.RasoulpoorS.ShohaimiS.MohammadiM. (2023). Global prevalence of constipation in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Wien Klin. Wochenschr135 (15-16), 389–398. 10.1007/s00508-023-02156-w

  • 70

    SamavatiN.McgrathD. M.JewettM. A.van der KwastT.MénardC.BrockK. K. (2015). Effect of material property heterogeneity on biomechanical modeling of prostate under deformation. Phys. Med. Biol.60 (1), 195–209. 10.1088/0031-9155/60/1/195

  • 71

    SarrióR. G.Calsina-BernaA.GarcíaA. G.Esparza-MiñanaJ. M.FerrerE. F.et alWorking Group ActEIO Project (2021). Delphi consensus on strategies in the management of opioid-induced constipation in cancer patients. BMC Palliat. Care20 (1), 1. 10.1186/s12904-020-00693-z

  • 72

    SichtingF.RossolJ.SoissonO.KlimaS.MilaniT.HammerN. (2014). Pelvic belt effects on sacroiliac joint ligaments: a computational approach to understand therapeutic effects of pelvic belts. Pain Physician17 (1), 43–51. 10.36076/ppj.2014/17/43

  • 73

    SilvaM.BrandãoS.ParenteM.MascarenhasT.Natal JorgeR. M. (2016). Establishing the biomechanical properties of the pelvic soft tissues through an inverse finite element analysis using magnetic resonance imaging. Proc. Institution Mech. Eng. Part H J. Eng. Med.230 (4), 298–309. 10.1177/0954411916630571

  • 74

    SilvaM.PinheiroF.FerreiraN.BrandãoF. S. Q. D. S.MartinsP. A. L. D. S.ParenteM. P. L.et al (2024). An estimation of the biomechanical properties of the continent and incontinent woman bladder via inverse finite element analysis. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. H. Mar.25, 598–607. 10.1177/09544119241237356

  • 75

    SolimanA.RicciP.KedzioraS.KelmJ.GerichT.MaasS. (2023). Developing a biomechanical testing setup of the pelvis-part II: experimental testing. J. Biomech. Eng.145 (10), 101002. 10.1115/1.4062578

  • 76

    SongH. F.HuangY.NiC. X.LeiL. L.WangX. Y.LiuZ. C.et al (2012). A finite element method for the simulation of levator ani muscle stress under different conditions. Chin. J. Tissue Eng. Res.16 (26), 4852–4856. 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8225.2012.26.020

  • 77

    StaffordR. E.AljuraifaniR.HugF.HodgesP. W. (2017). Application of shear-wave elastography to estimate the stiffness of the male striated urethral sphincter during voluntary contractions. BJU Int.119 (4), 619–625. 10.1111/bju.13688

  • 78

    StallingI.GruberM.BammannK. (2024). Sex differences in physical functioning among older adults: cross-sectional results from the OUTDOOR ACTIVE study. BMC Public Health24 (1), 1766. 10.1186/s12889-024-19218-x

  • 79

    SuhonenR.StoltM.EdvardssonD. (2022). Personalized nursing and health care: advancing positive patient outcomes in complex and multilevel care environments. J. Pers. Med.12 (11), 1801. 10.3390/jpm12111801

  • 80

    SunT. J. (2015). Abdominal impact and injury mechanism analysis of a six-year-old occupant based on finite element methods. Tianjin University of Science and Technology.

  • 81

    TalaszH.GoschM.KoflerM.LechleitnerM. (2018). Voiding disorders in geriatric patients: correlation with agerelated functional impairments. Z Gerontol. Geriatr.51 (1), 67–73. 10.1007/s00391-016-1097-y

  • 82

    TangJ. H.ZhongC.WenW.WuR.LiuY.DuL. F. (2020). Quantifying levator ani muscle elasticity under normal and prolapse conditions by shear wave elastography: a preliminary study. J. Ultrasound Med.39 (7), 1379–1388. 10.1002/jum.15232

  • 83

    Venugopala RaoG.RubodC.BrieuM.BhatnagarN.CossonM. (2010). Experiments and finite element modelling for the study of prolapse in the pelvic floor system. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Engin13 (3), 349–357. 10.1080/10255840903251270

  • 84

    WangY.QuX.SheY.ZhangY.LiuL. (2017). Reproducibility study of real-time shear wave elastography assessment in female puborectal muscle. J. China Med. Univ.46, 360–362. 10.12007/j.issn.0258⁃4646.2017.04.019

  • 85

    WangR.LiuG.JingL.ZhangJ.LiC.GongL. (2024a). Finite element analysis of pelvic floor biomechanical models to elucidate the mechanism for improving urination and defecation dysfunction in older adults: protocol for a model development and validation study. JMIR Res. Protoc.13, e56333. 10.2196/56333

  • 86

    WangR.LiuG.JingL.ZhangJ.YeY.ZhuH. (2024b). Quantifying the effects of five rehabilitation training methods on the ability of elderly men to control bowel movements: a finite element analysis study. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.12, 1392448. 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1392448

  • 87

    WilloughbyD. S.FlorezC.DavisJ.KeratsopoulosN.BisherM.ParraM.et al (2024). Decreased neuromuscular function and muscle quality along with increased systemic inflammation and muscle proteolysis occurring in the presence of decreased estradiol and protein intake in early to intermediate post-menopausal women. Nutrients16 (2), 197. 10.3390/nu16020197

  • 88

    WHO (2022). Ageing and health. World Health Organization. Available online at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ageing-and-health [Accessed 2023-August-15]

  • 89

    WolffW. L.LeonardisJ. M.LippsD. B. (2020). The relationship between muscle activation and shear elastic modulus of the sternocleidomastoid muscle during 3-D torque production. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol55, 102480. 10.1016/j.jelekin.2020.102480

  • 90

    WuX. L. (2019). Finite element analysis of biomechanics of injured levator ani muscle in female patients with moderate to severe SUI. Shanxi Medical University.

  • 91

    XieM.ZhangX. Y.LiuJ.DingJ. X.RenY. Y.HuaK. Q. (2015). Evaluation of levator ani with no defect on elastography in women with POP. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med.8, 10204–10212. Available online at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26309719/.

  • 92

    XuZ.WuY.ZhangX. Q. (2021). Finite element modeling method of female pelvic floor structure with mechanical simulation function. China Pat. CN 113570723A10, 29.

  • 93

    XuZ.ChenN.WangB.YangJ.LiuH.ZhangX.et al (2023). Creation of the biomechanical finite element model of female pelvic floor supporting structure based on thin-sectional high-resolution anatomical images. J. Biomech.146, 111399. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2022.111399

  • 94

    XuanR.YangM.GaoY.RenS.LiJ.YangZ.et al (2021). A simulation analysis of maternal pelvic floor muscle. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health18 (20), 10821. 10.3390/ijerph182010821

  • 95

    XueX.WangH.XieJ.GaoZ.ShenJ.YaoT. (2023). Two-dimensional biomechanical finite element modeling of the pelvic floor and prolapse. Biomech. Model Mechanobiol.22 (4), 1425–1446. 10.1007/s10237-023-01729-y

  • 96

    YangJ.GuoJ.BaY.QiuM.DuF.ChenJ. D. Z.et al (2024a). Transcutaneous electrical acustimulation improves constipation symptoms and accelerates colonic transit in patients with slow transit constipation through autonomic mechanism. Neuromodulation27 (2), 382–391. 10.1016/j.neurom.2023.11.005

  • 97

    YangM.ChenC.WangZ.LongJ.HuangR.QiW.et al (2024b). Finite element analysis of female pelvic organ prolapse mechanism: current landscape and future opportunities. Front. Med. (Lausanne)11, 1342645. 10.3389/fmed.2024.1342645

  • 98

    ZhangY.KimS.ErdmanA. G.RobertsK. P.TimmG. W. (2009). Feasibility of using a computer modeling approach to study SUI induced by landing a jump. Ann. Biomed. Eng.37 (7), 1425–1433. 10.1007/s10439-009-9705-2

  • 99

    ZhangY.WangC.YuX.WanL.ChengW.XieC.et al (2023). Characteristics, scope of activity, and negative emotions in elderly women with urinary incontinence: based on a longitudinal follow-up in shanghai, China. Biosci. Trends17 (2), 172–176. 10.5582/bst.2022.01507

  • 100

    ZhouC. J.LaiS. L. (2021). Research progress on MRI evaluation of abnormal defecation control function. Magn. Reson. Imaging12 (8), 114–117124. 10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2021.08.027

  • 101

    ZhouL. X.GuX. L.DuH. L. (2020a). Injury of levator ani muscles and occurrence of pelvic floor diseases during vaginal delivery based on finite element method. J. Med. Biomechanic35 (06), 732–738. 10.16156/j.1004-7220.2020.06.013

  • 102

    ZhouM.DuH.YingT.ShuiW.DouC. (2020b). Value of high-frequency two-dimensional ultrasound on evaluating puborectalis muscle. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet.301 (5), 1347–1352. 10.1007/s00404-020-05523-4

  • 103

    ZongJ. K. (2022). Finite element analysis of a novel anatomical plate for sacroiliac joint dislocation. Hebei Medical University.

Summary

Keywords

elderly women, finite element analysis, muscles, rehabilitation training, urinary and defecation dysfunction

Citation

Wang R, Liu G, Jing L, Zhao T and Qian X (2025) Finite element-based prioritization of pelvic floor muscles for rehabilitation to maintain urinary and fecal control in elderly women. Front. Physiol. 16:1663545. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1663545

Received

29 August 2025

Revised

15 October 2025

Accepted

31 October 2025

Published

24 November 2025

Volume

16 - 2025

Edited by

Geoffrey A. Head, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Australia

Reviewed by

Wenjian Li, Xuzhou Medical University, China

Yadong Mo, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (BUPT), China

Ana Margarida Vieira, Algarve Local Health Unit, Portugal

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Liwei Jing, ; Tuanjie Zhao,

† These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics