SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Physiol.
Sec. Exercise Physiology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1669941
The Effectiveness of High-Intensity Interval Training on Cardiometabolic Outcomes in Middle-Aged and Elderly Populations with Chronic Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Provisionally accepted
- 1Shangrao Normal University, Shangrao, China
- 2Sichuan University of Science and Engineering, Zigong, China
- 3Chuxiong Normal University, Chuxiong, China
- 4Deyang Vocational College of Technology and Trade, Deyang, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Objective: To assess the effectiveness of High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) on cardiometabolic outcomes in Middle-Aged and Elderly Populations (MAEP) with chronic diseases. Methods: Four databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science) were searched from inception to May 50, 2025. Software package RevMan version 5.4 and Stata 18 were conducted to determine publication bias and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) exploring the impacts of HIIT to components of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), fasting blood glucose (BG), and triglyceride (TG) on MAEP with chronic diseases. Subgroup moderator analyses were conducted based on the intervention duration and geographic region. Results: Out of 6,106 studies, 21 RCTs involving 1,066 participants were included. HIIT significantly benefits for DBP (SMD = -0.23, 95% CI: -0.39 to -0.08, p < 0.01), HDL-C (SMD = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.11 to 0.71, p < 0.01), TG (SMD= -0.68, 95% CI: -1.20 to -0.16; p < 0.05) and BG (SMD= –0.37, 95% CI: –0.69 to –0.06; p < 0.05), However, HIIT did not significantly reduce SBP (SMD = -0.14, 95% CI: -0.38 to 0.11, p > 0.05) among MAEP with chronic diseases. Subgroup analyses suggested that HIIT protocols with intervention duration and geographic region significantly reduced heterogeneity for outcomes such as SBP and HDL-C. Conclusion: While HIIT did not significantly reduce SBP, it yielded meaningful benefits for DBP, HDL-C, TG, and BG in MAEP with chronic diseases. The findings suggest that the effectiveness of HIIT may vary by region and intervention duration, highlighting the importance of tailoring HIIT protocols to specific populations and contexts.
Keywords: High-intensity interval training, Cardiometabolic outcomes, Middle-Aged andElderly Populations, chronic diseases, Systematic review, Meta-analysis
Received: 22 Jul 2025; Accepted: 30 Sep 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Li, Xu, Liu, Gao and Yu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Gang Xu, gangxu@suse.edu.cn
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.