Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Physiol., 17 September 2025

Sec. Avian Physiology

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2025.1670073

Embryonic thermal manipulation improved early immunity in broiler chickens

  • Department of Human Nutrition, Food and Animal Sciences, College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resilience, University of Hawaiʻi at Manoa, Honolulu, HL, United States

Immunity in chickens is age-dependent and develops gradually over time. The initial defense by the host is a crucial mechanism for combating microbial infections. Embryonic thermal manipulation (TM) represents a promising approach for sustainable broiler production. Our previous work provided significant insights into the effects of TM on embryonic thermotolerance, metabolism, growth performance, microbial diversity, and immunity. This follow-up study used a subset of hatchlings previously used in our TM-related studies. This study aims to investigate the effects of TM on immunity-related genes in the spleen, bursa, and thymus. A total of 600 fertile Cobb 500 eggs were incubated for 21 days. After candling, 238 eggs underwent TM at 38.5 °C from embryonic day (ED) 12–18, then transferred to a hatcher at 37.5 °C from ED 19 to 21, while 236 eggs were incubated at 37.5 °C throughout till 21 days. After hatching, 60-day-old unsexed chicks were housed in 12 pens (10 birds/pen, 6 replicates per treatment). The treatments included 1) Control and 2) TM. All birds were raised under standard conditions for the first 21 days. In the spleen, at d 7, the TM group showed significantly lower expression of cytokines (IL-10, IL-12, IL-18), TLRs (TLR-1, TLR-2A, TLR-4, TLR-21), and signaling markers (TBK-1, CD-3, NF-κB, TGF-β, TGF-β3) compared to the Control. At d 21, TM birds exhibited significantly lower (P < 0.05) expression of IL-4, IL-6, IFN-γ, and AvBD-6, while TLR-2A and TGF-β3 were significantly upregulated compared to the Control group. In bursa, at d 7, the TM group showed significantly higher expression of IL-1β, TLR-5, TLR-15, TLR-21, IFN-α, and NF-κB, while IL-6 was significantly downregulated. At d 14, IL-18 was significantly upregulated, and TLR-21 was significantly downregulated in the TM group. At d 21, IL8L1, IL-10, TLR-1, and CD-45 were significantly upregulated, whereas NF-κB expression was significantly downregulated compared to the Control group. In the thymus, at d 14, TLR15 was significantly higher, and at d 21, IL-10 was significantly lower in the TM compared to the Control group. In conclusion, embryonic TM enhanced early immune gene expression in broilers by upregulating essential immune-related genes in the spleen, bursa, and thymus.

1 Introduction

Avian immune organs are classified into core immune organs, which include the thymus, bursa of Fabricius, bone marrow, and peripheral immune organs, such as the spleen and cecal tonsils. The maturation of the immune system in broiler chickens is age-dependent. In the early stages, the immune system and its functions are underdeveloped and do not mature until later stages (Song et al., 2021). The development and evolution of immune organs significantly affect the overall immune function of birds and their ability to withstand various antigens and environmental stresses (Naukkarinen and Hippeläinen, 1989).

The avian spleen is the primary location for lymphocyte differentiation and proliferation, actively participating in hormonal and cell-mediated responses. Furthermore, the avian spleen activates innate and adaptive immune responses, highlighting its significance in immune regulation (Smith and Hunt, 2004). The bursa serves as the center for B-cell lymphopoiesis, lymphocyte maturation, and the differentiation and maturation of the antibody. It acts as a primary channel by which environmental antigens activate the immune system and promote the production of specific antibodies (Ifrah et al., 2017). As the initial lymphoid organ emerges during organismal development, the thymus houses essential immunological components pertinent to innate and adaptive immune responses (Reese et al., 2006).

The embryonic thermal manipulation (TM) has been shown to improve heat tolerance in poultry (Al Amaz and Mishra, 2024). Subjecting embryos to elevated incubation temperatures during critical developmental phases can improve their immune response at a later stage (Al-Zghoul et al., 2023). Our previous studies have revealed that embryonic TM enhances hatchability, thermotolerance, and liver metabolism while reducing hatch duration (Amaz et al., 2024). In slow-growing chickens, genetics and environmental factors interact to influence adaptability to thermotolerance (Nayak et al., 2024). Additionally, prehatch TM and post-hatch baicalein supplementation enhanced final growth performance, cecal microbial diversity, volatile fatty acid concentration (Al Amaz et al., 2024a), liver metabolism, muscle cell proliferation (Al Amaz et al., 2024b), and immunity at the later stage (Al Amaz et al., 2025) in heat-stressed broilers. Given the effectiveness of embryonic TM, we hypothesized that it would improve the early immune response. This study investigated the effect of TM on early immune response in the spleen, bursa, and thymus by assessing the crucial immunity-related gene markers.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Incubation

All experimental procedures involving animals were performed following the guidelines and regulations approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the University of Hawaiʻi (Approval No. 17-2605-6). This research utilized animal experimentation and samples from our previous studies (Amaz et al., 2024). Briefly, six hundred fertilized Cobb 500 broiler eggs were procured from Asagi Hatchery Inc (Honolulu, HI). The eggs were randomly and equally allocated among three incubators (GQF Incubator, Savannah, GA), each containing 200 eggs, despite the total capacity of the incubators being 270 eggs. The eggs were incubated under standard conditions (37.5 °C, 55% relative humidity (RH), 24 h/d) until embryonic day (ED) 11. Following candling, 474 viable embryos were chosen for the experiment. On ED 12, the eggs were allocated into two incubation cohorts: the Control group (n = 236), which maintained standard temperature until hatching on ED 21, and the TM group (n = 238), which underwent exposure to an elevated temperature at 38.5 °C and 55% relative humidity (RH) for 8 h/days from ED 12 to ED 18, subsequently reverting to standard temperature (37.5 °C) from ED 19 to ED 21. During ED 12-18, we employed only two incubators: one designated for the control group and another for the TM group. The incubation procedure involved automated temperature control, 55% RH, and egg rotation every 2 h.

2.2 Hatching and rearing management

The hatching rate was 91% in the Control and 94.5% in the TM cohorts (Amaz et al., 2024). After hatching, unsexed day-old chicks from both groups were divided into two treatment groups: 1) Control and 2) TM. The chicks were individually weighed, tagged, and randomly distributed into 12 pens, with 10 birds per pen, resulting in 6 replicates for each treatment group (n = 60 birds per treatment). Standard Cobb-500 broiler rearing and management protocols were followed (Cobb Broiler Management Guide, 2021). The Control and TM groups were maintained at a consistent 22 °C–24 °C temperature with 55% RH throughout the study. Birds were monitored thrice daily (morning, afternoon, and evening) to ensure health and management standards (discomfort, panting, or unusual behavior). Pens were randomly assigned, each 1 m × 0.61 m, providing a stocking density of 610 cm2 per bird. Wood shavings were used as litter (depth 4 in), the feeder’s dimensions were 15.75″L × 5.12″W × 4″H, and a hanging tube-4-nipple system (length 27″) waterer was used with the hose to a five-gallon bucket. The waterers were hung from the broader side of the pen and adjusted regularly, in accordance with the standard Cobb broiler protocol. There was no significant difference in growth performance during the brooding period. The birds were raised under a 23-h light, 1-h dark lighting schedule.

2.3 Diet

The corn-soybean meal-based basal diets were made for the starter phase (d 1–21) to fulfill the nutritional needs of the Cobb 500 broilers (Cobb Broiler Management Guide, 2021). Feed and water were provided ad libitum throughout the study. All the groups administered the basal diet for the duration of the study. The composition and nutrient profile of the diets are displayed in Table 1.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Composition of experimental diets and their nutrient profile.

2.4 Sample collection

On days 7, 14, and 21, 2 hours after feeding, one bird from each pen (n = 6 per treatment) was euthanized using carbon dioxide asphyxiation for tissue collection. Spleen, bursa, and thymus tissues were collected, immediately snap-frozen, and stored at −80 °C until RNA extraction.

2.5 Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR)

The total RNA was isolated from the spleen, bursa, and thymus tissues. The RNA concentration was measured with a NanoDrop™ spectrophotometer (ThermoFisher Scientific, Madison, WI). Subsequently, transcribed into cDNA and analyzed through qPCR by the established protocol (Amaz et al., 2025). The primer sequences utilized for gene expression analysis are presented in Supplementary Table S1. The NCBI Primer-Blast tool designed gene-specific primers for expression analysis. A High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) was used to reverse-transcribe 1 μg of total RNA (20 μL reaction of RT mixture) into complementary DNA (cDNA), which was subsequently diluted with nuclease-free water (1:25). qPCR was carried out using the PowerUp SYBR Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, United States) and real-time PCR equipment (Applied Biosystems). To achieve a final reaction volume of 10 μL, the qPCR reaction mixture included 3 μL of cDNA, 5 μL of PowerUp SYBR Green Master Mix, and 1 μL of each forward and reverse primer at a concentration of 5 μmol. The qPCR reaction was conducted using the standard cycling mode. A melting curve analysis was conducted to validate the SYBR Green-based amplicon. Furthermore, the specificity of each primer pair was evaluated through 1% gel electrophoresis of the qPCR products. The analysis was performed in triplicate for three housekeeping genes: glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), beta-actin (β-actin), and TATA-box binding protein (TBP). The TBP expression was consistently stable across the CAM tissues. Post-amplification, the cycle threshold (Ct) values were documented, and gene expression levels were determined utilizing TBP as the reference gene, following the 2−ΔΔCT method.

2.6 Statistical analysis

Gene expression was assessed using GraphPad (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). Following a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), the Tukey-HSD test was utilized to compare the means of various treatment groups. All data are presented as mean ± SEM. The criterion for statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

3 Results

3.1 Spleen gene expression

The expressions of immune-related genes (IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12, IL-18, TLR-1, TLR-2A, TLR-4, TLR-21, TBK-1, CD-3, IFN-γ, AvBD-6, NF-kB, TGF-β, and TGF-β3) among the treatments are shown in Figures 1, 2. At d 7, IL-10, IL-12, IL-18, TLR-1, TLR-2A, TLR-4, TLR-21, TBK-1, CD-3, NF-kB, TGF-β, and TGF-β3 expressions were significantly lower (P < 0.05) in the TM group than the Control group. There was no significant difference at d 14. However, at d 21, IL-4, IL-6, IFN-γ, and AvBD-6 expression were significantly lower (P < 0.05), and TLR-2A and TGF-β3 expression were significantly higher (P < 0.05) in the TM group compared to the Control.

Figure 1
Bar charts display relative mRNA expression levels for IL4, IL6, IL10, IL12, IL18, TLR1, TLR2A, and TLR4 across days 7, 14, and 21 for control (pink) and TM (orange) groups. Error bars indicate variability, and letters denote statistical significance.

Figure 1. Effects of TM on the mRNA expression of immune-related genes in the spleen. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. Different letters indicate a significant difference between the treatment groups.

Figure 2
Bar graphs show relative mRNA expression levels for different genes (TLR21, TBK1, CD3, IFNγ, AVBD6, NFkB, TGFβ, TGFβ3) at days 7, 14, and 21. Control is shown in magenta, and TM in orange. Expression varies between conditions and time points, with designations

Figure 2. Effects of TM on the mRNA expression of immune-related genes in the spleen. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. Different letters indicate a significant difference between the treatment groups.

3.2 Bursa gene expression

The expressions of immune-related genes (IL-1b, IL-6, IL-8L1, IL-10, IL-18, TLR-1, TLR-5, TLR-15, TLR-21, CD-45, IFN-α, NF-kB, and TGF-β) among the treatments are shown in Figures 3, 4. At d 7, IL-1 b, TLR-5, TLR-15, TLR-21, IFN-α, and NF-kB were significantly higher (P < 0.05) and IL-6 was significantly lower (P < 0.05) in the TM group than the Control group. At d 14, IL-18 was significantly higher (P < 0.05), and TLR-21 was significantly lower (P < 0.05) in the TM group than in the Control group. At d 21, IL8L1, IL-10, TLR-1, and CD-45 were significantly higher (P < 0.05); however, NF-kB was significantly lower (P < 0.05) in the TM group than in the Control group.

Figure 3
Bar charts display relative mRNA expression levels of genes IL1b, IL6, IL8L1, IL10, IL18, TLR1, TLR5, and TLR15 on days seven, fourteen, and twenty-one. Control is represented in pink and TM in orange. Expression levels are higher in TM across most genes and time points, with statistically significant differences marked by letters 'a' and 'b'.

Figure 3. Effects of TM on the mRNA expression of immune-related genes in the bursa. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. Different letters indicate a significant difference between the treatment groups.

Figure 4
Bar charts showing relative mRNA expression of TLR21, CD45, IFNα, NFkB, and TGFβ over days 7, 14, and 21 for Control (pink) and TM (orange) groups. TLR21 and IFNα show higher expression in TM, especially at day 7, while CD45 peaks for TM at day 21. NFkB is elevated in TM on day 7 and 21, and TGFβ is relatively consistent, slightly increasing by day 21. Error bars indicate variability.

Figure 4. Effects of TM on the mRNA expression of immune-related genes in the bursa. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. Different letters indicate a significant difference between the treatment groups.

3.3 Thymus gene expression

The expressions of immune-related genes (IL-1b, IL-6, IL-8L1, IL-10, IL-18, TLR-1, TLR-5, TLR-15, TLR-21, CD-45, IFN-a, NF-kB, and TGF- β) among the treatments are shown in Figure 5. At d 14, TLR-15 was significantly higher (P < 0.05), and at d 21, IL-10 was significantly lower (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the groups at d 7.

Figure 5
Bar graphs illustrating relative mRNA expression levels for various genes (IL8L1, IL10, IL18, TLR1, TLR5, TLR15, TLR21, IFNγ, CD14, TGFβ) over days 7, 14, and 21. Control (pink) and TM (orange) groups are compared. Error bars indicate variability in expression levels.

Figure 5. Effects of TM on the mRNA expression of immune-related genes in the thymus. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. Different letters indicate a significant difference between the treatment groups.

4 Discussion

The largest peripheral lymphoid organ in chickens is the spleen, which plays a crucial role in immune responses, particularly to blood-borne antigens (Kraal, 1992). In this study, we measured the expression of essential immune-related genes (IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12, IL-18, TLR-1, TLR-2A, TLR-4, TLR-21, TBK-1, CD-3, IFN-γ, AvBD-6, NF-κB, TGF-β, and TGF-Β3) in the spleen. IL-10 may be pivotal in altering the Th bias during E. maxima infection, inhibiting the emergence of robust, IFN-γ-driven responses, which are essential for managing Eimeria infections (Rothwell et al., 2004). In this study, at d 7, IL-10 expression was significantly reduced in TM birds compared to Controls, meaning the TM group may promote a more protective, pro-inflammatory environment, potentially shifting the local immune response from a Th2-biased, anti-inflammatory profile at an early stage. The IL-12 in chickens is essential for the immune response, especially in the spleen, by facilitating Th1-type immunity and the synthesis of IFN-γ. It plays a role in activating and proliferating specific T cell populations, such as γδ T cells. It is expressed in the spleen, particularly during infections such as coccidia (Degen et al., 2004). IL-12 expression was significantly lower in the TM than in the Control group at d 7. Its suppression could indicate a delayed development of early cell-mediated immunity. IL-18 interacts with IL-12 to stimulate IFN-γ production from T-helper 1 (Th1) cells and natural killer cells (Tominaga et al., 2000). TLR-1 is crucial for the identification of triacyl lipopeptides. Mice deficient in TLR-1 macrophages demonstrated diminished synthesis of inflammatory cytokines upon exposure to diverse triacyl lipopeptides and lipoproteins originating from mycobacteria (Kannaki et al., 2010). The function of TLR-4 as the receptor for gram-negative lipopolysaccharide is well recognized. Moreover, it binds to endogenous molecules produced due to tissue injury. Consequently, TLR-4 is an essential receptor that integrates infectious and noninfectious stimuli to initiate an inflammatory response (Molteni et al., 2016). TLR-21 is a pattern recognition receptor that identifies microbial DNA to initiate the host’s immune response to infection (Chuang et al., 2020). In chicken, chTBK1 might be a crucial immunoregulator for the induction of IRF-3 and IFN-β in response to virus stimulation (Wang et al., 2017). NF-kB is the principal regulator of the innate immune response to pathogenic bacteria, activated through MyD88-dependent signaling within the TLR pathway (Moynagh, 2005). TGF-βs regulate pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory activities, demonstrating their dual roles in the immune system (Okamura et al., 2015). At d 7, IL-18, TLR-1, TLR-4, TLR-21, TBK-1, CD-3. NF-kB and TGF-β were significantly downregulated in the TM compared to the control group. This coordinated downregulation indicates a reduced capacity for pathogen recognition and signaling, possibly due to the attenuation of MyD88-and IRF3-dependent pathways. The lower expression of IL-18 and IL-12 may impede IFN-γ production, consequently restricting Th1 and NK cell activation. These findings suggest that TM induces an immunomodulatory state after hatching, likely to reduce early-life inflammation and energy expenditure in the absence of infection, while altering the trajectory of immune system maturation. IL-4 is a cytokine that regulates antibody synthesis, hematopoiesis, inflammation, and the development of effector T-cell responses (Brown and Hural, 1997). IL-6 facilitates a transient defense against infection or injury by alerting the immune system to the source of inflammation. It modulates the immune response by facilitating the proliferation and differentiation of leukocytes that eradicate pathogenic microorganisms (Rodes, 2013). IFN-γ activates macrophages to augment phagocytosis, tumoricidal functions, and intracellular eradication of pathogens. It prompts macrophages to generate a diverse array of inflammatory mediators and reactive oxygen and nitrogen species. (IFN-γ) amplifies the cellular immune response after infection and vaccination (Santhakumar et al., 2017; Bagheri et al., 2022). In this study, at d 21, IL-4, IL-6, TLR-2A, IFN-γ, and AvBD-6 were significantly downregulated, and TGF-β3 was significantly upregulated in the TM compared to the control group. This expression profile signifies a transition towards a regulatory or anti-inflammatory immune condition. The inhibition of IL-4 and IL-6 indicates diminished B-cell activation and inflammatory signaling, whereas lowered IFN-γ and AvBD-6 levels suggest reduced macrophage activation and antimicrobial peptide defense. The simultaneous increase of TGF-β3, an essential immunosuppressive cytokine, facilitates the development of immune tolerance and the resolution of inflammation. Taken together, TM modified the course of immune development by attenuating early inflammatory signaling and immune activation in the spleen. On d 7, TM reduces innate immune responsiveness, whereas by d 21, suggesting a sustained shift toward immune homeostasis during early development. This immune modulation persisted until the marketing age (d 35) (Al Amaz et al., 2025). It proved advantageous by preserving energy for growth (Al Amaz et al., 2024a), as observed in our previous study with the same set of birds.

This study assessed the expression of crucial immune-related genes (IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8L1, IL-10, IL-18, TLR-1, TLR-5, TLR-15, TLR-21, CD-45, IFN-α, NF-κB, and TGF-β) in the bursa. IL-1b is an essential mediator of inflammation. In addition to being essential for the host’s defense against infections, it intensifies damage during acute tissue injury and chronic diseases (Lopez-Castejon and Brough, 2011). IL-1b was significantly upregulated in the TM compared to the control group on days 7 and 21, indicating an activated pro-inflammatory condition that may augment initial immune surveillance and pathogen defense. TLR-5 is essential for recognizing bacterial flagellin and triggering pro-inflammatory signaling via NF-κB activation. Its expression in diverse chicken tissues and immune cells, including heterophils and macrophage-like HD11 cells, enhances cytokine and chemokine production in response to bacterial exposure (Rehman et al., 2021). TLR-15 and -21 may be linked to the resistance or susceptibility of chickens to bacterial infections, including Salmonella (Ruan et al., 2012). At d 7, TLR-5, TLR-15, and IFN-α were significantly upregulated, while TLR-21 was significantly upregulated at d 7 and significantly downregulated at d 14. Indicating the early activation of innate immune detection and antiviral mechanisms. NF-kB also followed the same pattern. It was significantly upregulated at d 7 and significantly downregulated at d 21 in the TM. TLR21 and NF-kB are probably upregulated on d 7 to improve early microbial recognition and immune preparedness, suggesting a temporary activation of pro-inflammatory signaling and subsequently downregulated by days 14 and 21 as a feedback mechanism to sustain immune equilibrium and avert overstimulation once initial microbial exposure has been mitigated. In chickens, IL-8L1 is part of the CXC family and primarily influences neutrophils, T cells, B cells, and other lymphocytes (Van Sweringen et al., 2011). CD-45 regulates the interaction between T cells and macrophages by engaging with the ligand, macrophage galactose-type lectin. This interaction involves binding to CD-45 N-acetyl galactosamine, leading to diminished T cell proliferation and heightened pro-inflammatory cytokine production, ultimately culminating in T cell apoptosis (Rožman and Švajger, 2018). At d 21, IL-8L1, IL-10, TLR-1, and CD-45 were significantly upregulated in the TM group compared to the control group. This pattern indicates a transition to a more actively immunologically regulated condition, potentially preserving tissue homeostasis while facilitating pathogen defense in later development (Al Amaz et al., 2025). TM elicited a dynamic immune response in the bursa, marked by the early activation of innate defense and microbial-sensing pathways within the first week post-hatch. This preliminary response likely improves immune preparedness as chicks confront environmental antigens. In the later stages, the immune profile transitioned to a more regulated and balanced condition, facilitating immune surveillance and tissue homeostasis.

In the thymus, the expressions of immune-related genes (IL-1b, IL-6, IL-8L1, IL-10, IL-18, TLR-1, TLR-5, TLR-15, TLR-21, CD-45, IFN-α, NF-kB, and TGF-β) were assessed. TLR-15 was significantly upregulated at d 14, and IL-10 was significantly downregulated at d 21 in the TM compared to the Control group. In the thymus, TM resulted in a delayed upregulation of innate immune sensing on d 14, succeeded by reduced anti-inflammatory signaling on d 21. This pattern indicates a transition towards increased immune activation and diminished immune regulation, likely facilitating more robust T-cell maturation and responsiveness in later development.

5 Conclusion

This study revealed that embryonic thermal manipulation (TM) induces organ- and time-specific modulation in early immune development in chickens. In the spleen, TM suppressed pro-inflammatory and pathogen recognition signals, signifying the inhibition of MyD88-and IRF3-dependent pathways. TM increased innate immune detection and cytokine synthesis in the bursa, indicating the preliminary activation of antimicrobial defenses. Thymus responses exhibited lower regulatory signaling and higher innate activation, which may promote T-cell maturation. TM appeared to enhance immune function by fostering early immune response while establishing long-term immune balance, which may contribute to improved disease resistance and growth efficiency in later life stages.

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary Material.

Ethics statement

The animal study was approved by Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Hawaiʻi (Approval No. 17-2605-6). The study was conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements.

Author contributions

SA: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. SP: Formal Analysis, Writing – review and editing. BP: Formal Analysis, Writing – review and editing. SB: Formal Analysis, Writing – review and editing. RJ: Validation, Visualization, Writing – review and editing. BM: Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review and editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. BM obtained financial assistance for this project through a Start-up grant from CTAHR, the University of Hawaii at Manoa, and USDA Multistate (2052R). In addition to offering financial assistance, these organizations refrained from developing experimental protocols or manuscripts.

Acknowledgments

We sincerely thank Socorro Tauyan for her assistance with animal experiments. We thank Ajay Chaudhary, Prem Lal Mahato, Pravin Mishra, and Razib Das for supporting the sample collection.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2025.1670073/full#supplementary-material

References

Al Amaz S., Mishra B. (2024). Embryonic thermal manipulation: a potential strategy to mitigate heat stress in broiler chickens for sustainable poultry production. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 15, 75. doi:10.1186/s40104-024-01028-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Al Amaz S., Chaudhary A., Mahato P. L., Jha R., Mishra B. (2024a). Pre-hatch thermal manipulation of embryos and post-hatch baicalein supplementation mitigated heat stress in broiler chickens. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 15, 8. doi:10.1186/s40104-023-00966-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Al Amaz S., Shahid M. A. H., Jha R., Mishra B. (2024b). Prehatch thermal manipulation of embryos and posthatch baicalein supplementation increased liver metabolism, and muscle proliferation in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 103, 104155. doi:10.1016/j.psj.2024.104155

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Al Amaz S., Shahid M. A. H., Jha R., Mishra B. (2025). Early embryonic thermal programming and post-hatch flavonoid (Scutellaria baicalensis) supplementation enhanced immune response markers in broiler chickens. Front. Vet. Sci. 12, 1537116. doi:10.3389/fvets.2025.1537116

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Al-Zghoul M. B., Jaradat Z. W., Ababneh M. M., Okour M. Z., Saleh K. M. M., Alkofahi A., et al. (2023). Effects of embryonic thermal manipulation on the immune response to post-hatch Escherichia coli challenge in broiler chicken. Veterinary World 16, 918–928. doi:10.14202/vetworld.2023.918-928

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Amaz S. A., Shahid M. A. H., Chaudhary A., Jha R., Mishra B. (2024). Embryonic thermal manipulation reduces hatch time, increases hatchability, thermotolerance, and liver metabolism in broiler embryos. Poult. Sci. 103, 103527. doi:10.1016/j.psj.2024.103527

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Amaz S. A., Wasti S., Adnan M. R., Chaudhary A., Jha R., Mishra B. (2025). Dried plum supplementation enhanced the expression of liver antioxidant capacity, metabolism, and epigenetic-related gene markers in broiler chickens under heat stress conditions: dried plum increased liver metabolism in broiler. Poult. Sci. 104, 104911. doi:10.1016/j.psj.2025.104911

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bagheri S., Paudel S., Wijewardana V., Kangethe R. T., Cattoli G., Hess M., et al. (2022). Production of interferon gamma and interleukin 17A in chicken T-cell subpopulations hallmarks the stimulation with live, irradiated and killed avian pathogenic Escherichia coli. Dev. & Comp. Immunol. 133, 104408. doi:10.1016/j.dci.2022.104408

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Brown M. A., Hural J. (1997). Functions of IL-4 and control of its expression. Crit. Rev. Immunol. 17, 1–32. doi:10.1615/critrevimmunol.v17.i1.10

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chuang Y.-C., Tseng J.-C., Yang J.-X., Liu Y.-L., Yeh D.-W., Lai C.-Y., et al. (2020). Toll-like receptor 21 of chicken and duck recognize a broad array of immunostimulatory CpG-oligodeoxynucleotide sequences. Vaccines 8, 639. doi:10.3390/vaccines8040639

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cobb Broiler Management Guide (2021). Biosecurity and Farm Sanitation, Siloam Springs, AR: Cobb-Vantress, Inc. Available online at: www.cobb-vantress.com. (Accessed March 01, 2022).

Google Scholar

Degen W. G. J., Van Daal N., Van Zuilekom H. I., Burnside J., Schijns V. E. J. C. (2004). Identification and molecular cloning of functional chicken IL-12. J. Immunol. 172, 4371–4380. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.172.7.4371

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ifrah M. E., Perelman B., Finger A., Uni Z. (2017). The role of the bursa of Fabricius in the immune response to vaccinal antigens and the development of immune tolerance in chicks (Gallus domesticus) vaccinated at a very young age. Poult. Sci. 96, 51–57. doi:10.3382/ps/pew232

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kannaki T. R., Reddy M. R., Shanmugam M., Verma P. C., Sharma R. P. (2010). Chicken toll-like receptors and their role in immunity. World’s Poult. Sci. J. 66, 727–738. doi:10.1017/S0043933910000693

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kraal G. (1992). Cells in the marginal zone of the spleen. Int. Rev. Cytol. 132, 31–74. doi:10.1016/S0074-7696(08)62453-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lopez-Castejon G., Brough D. (2011). Understanding the mechanism of IL-1β secretion. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 22, 189–195. doi:10.1016/j.cytogfr.2011.10.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Molteni M., Gemma S., Rossetti C. (2016). The role of toll-like receptor 4 in infectious and noninfectious inflammation. Mediat. Inflamm. 2016, 6978936–6978939. doi:10.1155/2016/6978936

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Moynagh P. N. (2005). TLR signalling and activation of IRFs: revisiting old friends from the NF-kappaB pathway. Trends Immunol. 26, 469–476. doi:10.1016/j.it.2005.06.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Naukkarinen A., Hippeläinen M. (1989). Development of the peripheral immune function in the chicken: a study on the bursa of Fabricius isolated from the rest of the gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT). APMIS 97, 787–792. doi:10.1111/j.1699-0463.1989.tb00479.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nayak N., Bhanja S. K., Chakurkar E. B., Sahu A. R. (2024). Adaptive capability of slow-growing backyard poultry as indicated by physiological and molecular responses in a hot and humid coastal climate. J. Therm. Biol. 125, 103985. doi:10.1016/j.jtherbio.2024.103985

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Okamura T., Morita K., Iwasaki Y., Inoue M., Komai T., Fujio K., et al. (2015). Role of TGF-β3 in the regulation of immune responses. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 33 (4 Suppl. 92), S63–S69.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Reese S., Dalamani G., Kaspers B. (2006). The avian lung-associated immune system: a review. Vet. Res. 37, 311–324. doi:10.1051/vetres:2006003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rehman M. S., Rehman S. U., Yousaf W., Hassan F., Ahmad W., Liu Q., et al. (2021). The potential of toll-like receptors to modulate avian immune system: exploring the effects of genetic variants and phytonutrients. Front. Genet. 12, 671235. doi:10.3389/fgene.2021.671235

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rodes L., Khan A., Paul A., Coussa-Charley M., Marinescu D., Tomaro-Duchesneau C., et al. (2013). Effect of probiotics lactobacillus and bifidobacterium on gut-derived lipopolysaccharides and inflammatory cytokines: an in vitro study using a human colonic microbiota model. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 23, 518–526. doi:10.4014/jmb.1205.05018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rothwell L., Young J. R., Zoorob R., Whittaker C. A., Hesketh P., Archer A., et al. (2004). Cloning and characterization of chicken IL-10 and its role in the immune response to Eimeria maxima. J. Immunol. 173, 2675–2682. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.173.4.2675

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rožman P., Švajger U. (2018). The tolerogenic role of IFN-γ. Cytokine & Growth Factor Rev. 41, 40–53. doi:10.1016/j.cytogfr.2018.04.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ruan W. K., Wu Y. H., An J., Zheng S. J. (2012). Polymorphisms of chicken Toll-like receptors 4, 15, and 21 in different breeds. Poult. Sci. 91, 2512–2516. doi:10.3382/ps.2012-02319

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Santhakumar D., Rubbenstroth D., Martinez-Sobrido L., Munir M. (2017). Avian interferons and their antiviral effectors. Front. Immunol. 8, 49. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2017.00049

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Smith K. G., Hunt J. L. (2004). On the use of spleen mass as a measure of avian immune system strength. Oecologia 138, 28–31. doi:10.1007/s00442-003-1409-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Song B., Tang D., Yan S., Fan H., Li G., Shahid M. S., et al. (2021). Effects of age on immune function in broiler chickens. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 12, 42. doi:10.1186/s40104-021-00559-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tominaga K., Yoshimoto T., Torigoe K., Kurimoto M., Matsui K., Hada T., et al. (2000). IL-12 synergizes with IL-18 or IL-1beta for IFN-gamma production from human T cells. Int. Immunol. 12, 151–160. doi:10.1093/intimm/12.2.151

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Van Sweringen H. L., Sakai N., Tevar A. D., Burns J. M., Edwards M. J., Lentsch A. B. (2011). CXC chemokine signaling in the liver: impact on repair and regeneration. Hepatology 54, 1445–1453. doi:10.1002/hep.24457

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang Y., Yin Y., Lan X., Ye F., Tian K., Zhao X., et al. (2017). Molecular characterization, expression of chicken TBK1 gene and its effect on IRF3 signaling pathway. PLoS ONE 12, e0177608. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0177608

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: cytokines, embryogenesis, immunomodulation, lymphoid, ontogeny

Citation: Amaz SA, Poudel S, Pandey BK, Burlakoti S, Jha R and Mishra B (2025) Embryonic thermal manipulation improved early immunity in broiler chickens. Front. Physiol. 16:1670073. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1670073

Received: 21 July 2025; Accepted: 08 September 2025;
Published: 17 September 2025.

Edited by:

Krystyna Pierzchała-Koziec, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Poland

Reviewed by:

Mohammad Al-Zghoul, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Jordan
Amiya Ranjan Sahu, Central Coastal Agricultural Research Institute (ICAR), India

Copyright © 2025 Amaz, Poudel, Pandey, Burlakoti, Jha and Mishra. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Birendra Mishra, Ym1pc2hyYUBoYXdhaWkuZWR1

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.