SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Physiol.
Sec. Exercise Physiology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1683281
This article is part of the Research TopicAdvancing Sports Cardiology: New Frontiers in Athlete Screening and RecoveryView all articles
The Effects of Plyometric Training on Athletic' Jump Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Provisionally accepted- 1Universiti Putra Malaysia Fakulti Pengajian Pendidikan, Serdang, Malaysia
- 2Guilin University of Technology, Guilin, China
- 3The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background Jump performance is essential in sports and relies on explosive power. Although many studies have shown that PT improves jump performance, few have directly compared PT and RT across different jump types. This study aims to address this gap. Objective This study compares the effectiveness of plyometric and regular training on enhancing jump performance in healthy athletes. Method Five electronic databases (PubMed, ERIC, Web of Science, EBSCOhost, and Scopus) were comprehensively searched for relevant studies. Review Manager software was used for statistical analyses. The quality of included studies and risk of bias were assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool by two independent reviewers, with disagreements resolved by consensus. Forest plots and subgroup analyses were conducted for metrics with a sample size of three or more. Heterogeneity was assessed by using the I² statistic (25% for low, 50% for moderate, and 75% for high). A random-effects model was used for high heterogeneity and a fixed-effects model for low heterogeneity. Estimates were reported with confidence intervals, and significance was set at α = 0.05. Results The meta-analysis showed that plyometric training significantly improved counter movement jump performance compared to routine training (SMD = 1.99, 95% CI [1.50, 2.48], p < 0.001, I² = 0%). For squat jump, there was no significant difference between the two training methods (SMD = 0.96, 95% CI [-0.10, 2.02], p = 0.07, I² = 0%). Vertical jump performance also showed no significant difference (SMD = 2.90, 95% CI [-0.50, 6.30], p = 0.09, I² = 63%). Subgroup analysis of vertical jump performance indicated low heterogeneity for female subjects (I² = 0%) and high heterogeneity for male subjects (I² = 71%), primarily due to the inclusion of one outlier study. Excluding this study reduced the heterogeneity to 5% (SMD = 3.20, 95% CI [1.80, 4.60], p < 0.001). Conclusion This study shows that plyometric training significantly improves counter movement jump performance compared to routine training. This study demonstrates that plyometric training significantly enhances counter movement jump performance, while showing no superior effects on squat jump and vertical jump performance compared with routine training.
Keywords: Plyometric training, Jump performance, healthy athletes, A systematic review, Meta-analysis
Received: 10 Aug 2025; Accepted: 09 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Ma, Soh, Wang, Xu and Tu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Shuzhen Ma, mashuzhen@glut.edu.cn
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.