Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Physiol.

Sec. Vascular Physiology

This article is part of the Research TopicExploring the Physiological and Molecular Benefits of Physical Exercise in Cardiovascular DiseasesView all 5 articles

A Meta-analysis of the Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training on Circulatory System-Related Indicators in Sedentary Populations

Provisionally accepted
Guoshuai  LiGuoshuai Li1*Depeng  DongDepeng Dong2*
  • 1School of Physical Education, Shandong University, Jinan, China
  • 2School of Sports Science, Qufu Normal University, Qufu, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objective: This study systematically evaluated the effects of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) on circulatory indicators in sedentary populations. Following the framework of systematic review and meta-analysis, it synthesized current evidence to support the evidence-based application of HIIT in exercise interventions for sedentary individuals. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered on PROSPERO. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and CNKI for studies published between January 2000 and July 2025. Inclusion criteria used the PICOS framework: Participants (sedentary individuals), Intervention (HIIT), Comparison (control), Outcomes (blood pressure, pulse wave velocity, flow-mediated dilation, heart rate), and Study type (RCTs). The search yielded 434 records. After duplicate removal and screening, 14 RCTs (500 participants) were included. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool assessed study quality, and analyses used RevMan 5.4. Results: Significant differences were observed between the HIIT and control groups in several outcomes: systolic blood pressure (SBP) (MD = -5.02, 95% CI: -7.29 to -2.76, P < 0.0001), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (MD = -2.43, 95% CI: -4.08 to -0.79, P = 0.004), pulse wave velocity (PWV) (MD = -0.28, 95% CI: -0.56 to -0.01, P = 0.04), flow-mediated dilation (FMD) (SMD = 1.12, 95% CI: 0.32 to 1.92, P = 0.006), and heart rate (MD = -0.36, 95% CI: -0.69 to -0.03, P = 0.03). Subgroup analysis of FMD revealed no heterogeneity in studies with a mean participant age of>30 years (P = 0.38, I² = 0%). However, substantial heterogeneity remained in studies with a mean age ≤30 years (P = 0.0003, I² = 79%), suggesting age may be a major source of heterogeneity. Conclusion: HIIT effectively improves key circulatory indicators in sedentary populations, including blood pressure, vascular elasticity, and endothelial function, making it a valuable exercise strategy for vascular health management. However, further high-quality and standardized clinical trials are needed to confirm its long-term efficacy and safety.

Keywords: High-intensity interval training, Sedentary population, Bloodpressure, pulse wave velocity, Endothelial Function, Meta-analysis

Received: 09 Sep 2025; Accepted: 19 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Li and Dong. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Guoshuai Li, 1902510981@qq.com
Depeng Dong, 3856365247@qq.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.