Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Physiol., 05 January 2026

Sec. Lipid and Fatty Acid Research

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2025.1716333

Assessing insulin resistance: the triglyceride-glucose index as a predictor of survival in nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Xin Hua&#x;Xin Hua1Fei Xu&#x;Fei Xu2Xu-Xin Lin,&#x;Xu-Xin Lin1,3Yong-Miao LinYong-Miao Lin4Zhi-Qing LongZhi-Qing Long4Si-Fen WangSi-Fen Wang4Fang-Fang DuanFang-Fang Duan4Chao ZhangChao Zhang4Xin HuangXin Huang4Wen XiaWen Xia4Wen-Chao LiWen-Chao Li5Ao-Qiang Chen
Ao-Qiang Chen4*De-Huan Xie
De-Huan Xie1*Sha-Sha Du
Sha-Sha Du1*
  • 1Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
  • 2Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical School Affiliated Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, China
  • 3School of Medicine South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
  • 4Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
  • 5Department of Oncology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Foshan, China

Background: The triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index, a simple marker of insulin resistance, has shown prognostic value in various malignancies. However, its predictive utility for survival in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients remains largely unexamined. This study aimed to assess the prognostic value of the TyG index and to develop novel predictive models for survival outcomes in NPC.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 833 NPC patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). All patients were staged according to the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC)/Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) TNM staging system. The TyG index was calculated as ln (fasting triglycerides × fasting glucose). Primary and secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), respectively. We utilized univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models to identify independent prognostic factors and subsequently constructed and validated nomograms.

Results: A low TyG index was significantly associated with better survival outcomes, serving as an independent predictor for OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.534; P = 0.007), LRFS (HR = 0.423; P < 0.001), and DMFS (HR = 0.575; P = 0.010) in multivariate analysis. The newly developed nomograms demonstrated favorable discriminative performance, significantly outperforming the conventional TNM staging system (concordance index [C-index] for OS: 0.722 vs. 0.634).

Conclusion: The TyG index is a readily available, powerful prognostic biomarker for NPC patients. Incorporating the TyG index into prognostic nomograms offers a superior tool for individualized risk stratification and treatment planning, representing a valuable advancement over traditional staging systems.

1 Introduction

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) exhibits distinct epidemiological patterns and clinical characteristics that distinguish it from other head and neck malignancies (Chen et al., 2019). While contemporary treatment strategies incorporating intensity-modulated radiotherapy combined with platinum-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy have significantly improved patient outcomes, substantial prognostic heterogeneity remains among patients with identical tumor-node-metastasis classifications (Wong et al., 2021). This variability underscores the critical need for novel biomarkers that reflect host metabolic status and enable refined personalized risk stratification.

Accumulating evidence suggests that metabolic disturbances play pivotal roles in NPC development and progression. Epidemiological studies from endemic regions have documented significant associations between type 2 diabetes mellitus and increased head and neck cancer risk (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03–1.89) (Tseng et al., 2014). More significantly, metabolic syndrome—characterized by insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, hyperglycemia, and central obesity—serves as an independent prognostic factor, with affected patients demonstrating substantially reduced 5-year OS compared to metabolically healthy individuals (78.4% vs. 85.7%, P = 0.001) (Huang et al., 2021). Among these metabolic abnormalities, lipid dysregulation shows particular clinical significance: studies from Southern China indicate that hypercholesterolemia significantly increases NPC risk, while decreased pretreatment high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels also predict worse survival outcomes (Liu et al., 2016; Wang C.-T. et al., 2019).

The pathophysiological mechanisms linking metabolic dysfunction to carcinogenesis involve insulin resistance and compensatory hyperinsulinemia (Zhang et al., 2021). Chronic hyperinsulinemia suppresses hepatic synthesis of insulin-like growth factor binding proteins, thereby increasing free Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 (IGF-1) bioavailability, which subsequently activates IGF-1 receptors (IGF-1R) to promote cellular proliferation and metastatic potential (Djiogue et al., 2013). In NPC, elevated IGF-1 levels demonstrate diagnostic value, while increased Insulin-like Growth Factor-Binding Protein (IGFBP-1): IGF-1 ratios independently predict adverse survival (Feng et al., 2017). Mechanistic studies reveal that Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection—causally implicated in over 95% of endemic cases—directly induces IGF-1 expression through viral small RNA pathways, establishing autocrine proliferative loops (Iwakiri et al., 2005). This virus-metabolic interaction is further amplified by EBV-mediated alterations in glucose metabolism, where viral latent membrane proteins upregulate glucose transporter expression and enhance glycolytic flux (Zhang et al., 2017).

Although the hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp (HEC) represents the gold standard for assessing peripheral insulin sensitivity, its clinical application is limited by practical constraints. The homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) similarly faces limitations including high costs and potential interference from exogenous insulin. In contrast, the TyG index, calculated from fasting triglyceride and glucose values, has emerged as a practical surrogate marker with validity comparable to HOMA-IR (Guerrero-Romero et al., 2010; Er et al., 2016). This index uniquely captures the combined effects of lipotoxicity and glucotoxicity, both crucial modulators of insulin resistance, and has demonstrated prognostic value across various malignancies (Fritz et al., 2020).

Despite its recognized utility in multiple clinical settings, no studies have investigated the prognostic significance of the TyG index in NPC populations. This study therefore examined the prognostic value of the TyG index in a large-scale, real-world NPC cohort to elucidate metabolic contributions to NPC prognosis and facilitate development of clinically applicable prognostic tools.

2 Methods

2.1 Patients

This retrospective study consecutively included patients with NPC who received platinum-based CCRT at the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center in China between January 2010 and December 2014. The cohort was defined by several strict inclusion criteria: (1) treatment-naïve non-metastatic NPC, confirmed through both histopathological and radiographic examinations; (2) availability of comprehensive pretreatment clinical and laboratory data; (3) receipt of radical intensity-modulated radiotherapy combined with weekly or triweekly platinum-based concurrent chemotherapy; (4) absence of any subsequent second primary cancers or a history of prior malignant tumors; and (5) the availability of complete and regular follow-up records. All patients were restaged in accordance with the 8th edition of the AJCC/UICC TNM staging system. The study protocol received ethical approval from the Research Ethics Committee of the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, with a waiver of written informed consent. This observational study was reported in compliance with the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines.

2.2 Data collection

Clinical and demographic information was meticulously extracted from the medical records of all eligible patients. The primary laboratory data, including fasting triglyceride and blood glucose levels, were collected from pretreatment biochemical tests. Plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA (EBV-DNA) levels were measured using a real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction method.

The TyG index was mathematically determined using the following formula (Simental-Mendía et al., 2008): TyG index = ln [triglycerides (mg/dL) × blood glucose (mg/dL)/2].

Survival outcomes were defined as follows: OS was the period from the date of initial diagnosis to the date of death from any cause or the date of the last follow-up. LRFS was defined as the time from the date of diagnosis to the first documented occurrence of a locoregional relapse. DMFS was the time from the date of diagnosis to the first documented occurrence of distant metastasis. For both LRFS and DMFS, patients who did not experience an event were censored at the time of their last follow-up.

2.3 Statistical analysis

Continuous variables were summarized using medians and interquartile ranges (IQR), while categorical variables were presented as frequencies and percentages. The optimal cutoff value for the TyG index was determined using the maximally selected rank statistics with survival status as the primary endpoint, employing the “maxstat” package (Hothorn and Zeileis, 2008; Hua et al., 2021). This method was chosen to derive a data-specific threshold that best discriminates between patient outcomes within this particular cohort, rather than relying on an arbitrary or a pre-defined value. Survival curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank tests.

To assess the relationship between clinicopathological factors and survival, both univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were utilized. Variables with a P-value <0.20 in the univariate analysis were considered for inclusion in the multivariate model. The proportional hazards assumption for the multivariate model was validated using Schoenfeld residuals. The variance inflation factors (VIFs) were calculated to detect potential multicollinearity among the variables, with no substantial multicollinearity (all VIFs <10) being observed.

Prognostic nomograms were constructed based on the significant independent prognostic factors identified in the multivariate analyses. The discriminative ability of the models was quantified using Harrell’s C-index. The predictive performance of the nomograms was further assessed through calibration curves and Decision Curve Analysis (DCA). A two-tailed P-value <0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. All statistical computations were performed using R statistical software version 4.2.1.

3 Results

3.1 Patient characteristics

A total of 833 non-metastatic NPC patients who were treated with platinum-based CCRT were enrolled in this retrospective study. The baseline clinicopathological characteristics of the patient cohort are summarized in Table 1. The median age was 45.4 years, with 411 individuals (49.3%) aged 45 years or older. The cohort was predominantly male, comprising 616 patients (73.9%). The vast majority of patients had World Health Organization (WHO) histological type III pathology (98.4%). Furthermore, 269 patients (32.3%) had pretreatment plasma EBV-DNA levels of 4,000 copies/mL or greater.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Patient demographics and clinical characteristics.

The optimal cutoff value for the TyG index was determined to be 8.92 using the maximally selected rank statistics (Hothorn and Zeileis, 2008). This data-driven threshold, which was specifically calibrated to provide the best separation in survival outcomes for this cohort, was then used to dichotomize the patient population into two groups: a high-TyG group (>8.92, n = 250, 30.0%) and a low-TyG group (≤8.92, n = 583, 70.0%) (Supplementary Figure S1).

3.2 Prognostic value of TyG index in NPC

The median follow-up period for the entire cohort was 63.1 months (IQR: 49.3–72.3 months). During this time, the median OS was 63.0 months, with 78 (9.4%) deaths occurring across the entire cohort. There were 78 (9.4%) locoregional recurrences and 92 (11.0%) distant metastases.

A clear and significant difference in survival was observed between the two TyG index groups. The high-TyG group experienced a higher rate of adverse events, with 36 deaths (14.4%), 38 locoregional recurrences (15.2%), and 37 distant metastases (14.8%). In contrast, the low-TyG group experienced 42 deaths (7.2%), 40 locoregional recurrences (6.9%), and 55 distant metastases (9.4%), representing significantly fewer events.

Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated that patients in the low-TyG group had consistently superior survival outcomes compared to those in the high-TyG group for all three endpoints (Figure 1). The TyG index was significantly associated with OS (HR = 0.50; 95% CI: 0.32–0.79; P = 0.002), LRFS (HR = 0.44; 95% CI: 0.28–0.68; P < 0.001), and DMFS (HR = 0.60; 95% CI: 0.39–0.90; P = 0.015).

Figure 1
Three Kaplan-Meier survival curves labeled A, B, and C compare high and low TyG index groups. Curve A shows overall survival with a significant difference (log-rank P = 0.002, HR 0.50). Curve B presents local recurrence-free survival with a significant difference (log-rank P < 0.001, HR 0.44). Curve C displays distant metastasis-free survival with a significant difference (log-rank P = 0.015, HR 0.60). The x-axis is time in months, and the y-axis varies by graph (OS, LRFS, DMFS). At-risk numbers are shown below each graph.

Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier survival curves comparing high and low TyG index groups. (A) Overall Survival (OS) analysis (log-rank P = 0.002, HR = 0.50). (B) Local Recurrence-Free Survival (LRFS) analysis (log-rank P < 0.001, HR = 0.44). (C) Distant Metastasis-Free Survival (DMFS) analysis (log-rank P = 0.015, HR = 0.60). The TyG index significantly stratified all three survival outcomes. The horizontal axis represents follow-up time in months, and the vertical axis indicates the estimated survival probability. Numbers of patients at risk are displayed below the respective survival curves.

3.3 Cox regression analyses of OS, LRFS and DMFS in NPC

Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to evaluate the independent prognostic significance of the TyG index and other clinicopathological factors. The assumption of proportional hazards was met for the multivariate models.

The results of the multivariate analysis for OS revealed that the TyG index was an independent prognostic factor (HR = 0.534; 95% CI: 0.339–0.841; P = 0.007). Other factors independently associated with OS included N stage, with N2 (HR = 3.066; P = 0.037) and N3 (HR = 4.665; P = 0.013) stages carrying a significantly higher risk compared to N0 stage. T stage T4 (HR = 7.830; P = 0.046) was also an independent predictor for OS (Table 2).

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Univariate and multivariate cox regression analyses of overall survival.

For LRFS, the multivariate analysis confirmed the TyG index as an independent predictor (HR = 0.423; 95% CI: 0.271–0.662; P < 0.001). A similar trend was observed for N stage, where N3 stage (HR = 4.324; P = 0.039) was significantly associated with poorer LRFS (Table 3).

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Univariate and multivariate cox regression analyses of locoregional recurrence-free survival.

The multivariate analysis for DMFS also identified the TyG index as an independent prognostic factor (HR = 0.575; 95% CI: 0.377–0.877; P = 0.010). N stage N3 (HR = 3.595; P = 0.021) and EBV-DNA levels ≥4,000 copies/mL (HR = 1.873; P = 0.004) were also independent predictors of DMFS (Table 4).

Table 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. Univariate and multivariate cox regression analyses of distant metastasis-free survival.

3.4 Development of novel prognostic models based on TyG index

Based on the independent prognostic factors identified in the multivariate analyses, new nomograms for the individualized prediction of 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival probabilities were constructed (Figure 2). These models were designed to be simple and clinically accessible, allowing for the calculation of a cumulative prognostic score for each patient by aggregating the scores from each of the predictive variables. This aggregate score could then be used to forecast survival probabilities, providing a straightforward tool for clinicians to estimate a patient’s prognosis.

Figure 2
Three diagrams labeled A, B, and C depict nomograms with various metrics. A shows T stage, N stage, TyG index, and total points influencing 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year overall survival (OS). B illustrates N stage, TyG index, and total points affecting 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS). C presents N stage, EBV-DNA status, TyG index, and total points impacting 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). Each diagram includes point scales for calculation.

Figure 2. Prognostic nomograms for individualized prediction of 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival outcomes. These nomograms were constructed using multivariable modeling results based on selected clinical factors. (A) Nomogram predicting 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year Overall Survival (OS), incorporating T stage, N stage, and the TyG index. (B) Nomogram for Local Recurrence-Free Survival (LRFS), incorporating N stage and the TyG index. (C) Nomogram for Distant Metastasis-Free Survival (DMFS), uniquely incorporating N stage, EBV-DNA status, and the TyG index. Prediction is calculated by summing points from each predictor variable to achieve a total score, which is then mapped to the final survival probability scale.

3.5 Assessment of predictive performance of the prognostic models

The developed prognostic models demonstrated a robust discriminatory capacity (Figure 3). The C-indices for predicting survival were 0.722 (95% CI: 0.661–0.783) for OS, 0.655 (95% CI: 0.582–0.728) for LRFS, and 0.679 (95% CI: 0.617–0.742) for DMFS. This performance was quantitatively superior to the conventional TNM staging system, which yielded C-indices of 0.634 (95% CI: 0.526–0.742) for OS, 0.562 (95% CI: 0.453–0.671) for LRFS, and 0.599 (95% CI: 0.513–0.685) for DMFS. The calibration plots further illustrated a strong concordance between the nomogram-predicted and the actual observed survival outcomes at 1, 3, and 5 years. Additionally, DCA curves indicated that the TyG-based models provided a net benefit superior to that of the traditional TNM staging system.

Figure 3
Graphs depict calibration and decision curve analyses for survival predictions at 12, 36, and 60 months. Panels A, C, and E show observed versus predicted survival for overall survival (OS), locoregional-free survival (LRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), respectively. Panels B, D, and F show net benefit across risk thresholds, comparing nomogram, TNM stage, and all models.

Figure 3. Validation of nomogram models via calibration plots and Decision Curve Analysis (DCA) at 12, 36, and 60 months. (A,C,E) Calibration curves for Overall Survival (OS), Locoregional Recurrence-Free Survival (LRFS), and Distant Metastasis-Free Survival (DMFS); proximity to the diagonal line represents ideal prediction accuracy. (B,D,F) DCA plots illustrate the clinical Net Benefit of the nomogram. Model performance is compared against the TNM stage and reference strategies (treat all/treat none), quantifying superior clinical utility across decision thresholds.

4 Discussion

This study represents the first comprehensive analysis evaluating the prognostic utility of the TyG index in a large NPC cohort receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Our findings demonstrate that elevated pretreatment TyG values independently predict reduced overall survival, increased locoregional recurrence, and enhanced distant metastatic risk. This prognostic capacity remained statistically robust after adjusting for established clinical determinants, including TNM staging and pretreatment EBV-DNA levels. The sustained significance of TyG index within multivariate analyses indicates this metabolic marker captures biologically meaningful systemic information distinct from tumor anatomical features, thereby offering complementary risk assessment capabilities that enhance traditional prognostic paradigms.

The mechanistic connections between metabolic dysfunction and cancer outcomes align with accumulating evidence supporting these fundamental pathophysiologic relationships. Metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance show well-documented associations with increased cancer incidence and reduced survival across various malignancy types (Esposito et al., 2012). Our investigation extends this framework by specifically characterizing TyG index prognostic relevance in NPC, an area previously lacking systematic evaluation.

Compensatory hyperinsulinemia from insulin resistance reduces hepatic IGF binding protein production, increasing bioavailable IGF-1 that stimulates IGF-1R signaling pathways promoting cellular growth and metastatic spread (Clayton et al., 2011; Hua et al., 2020). In NPC, elevated serum IGF-1 associates with poor outcomes (M’hamdi et al., 2016; Feng et al., 2017), while EBV infection enhances IGF-1 expression through autocrine mechanisms (Iwakiri et al., 2005; Yuan et al., 2008). Laboratory investigations confirm IGF-1R inhibition reduces proliferation, improves radiosensitivity, and limits metastasis (Wang Z. et al., 2019; Yang et al., 2024), with early clinical trials demonstrating preliminary antitumor efficacy (de Bono et al., 2020).

Beyond IGF pathway alterations, the TyG index simultaneously captures glucotoxicity and lipotoxicity effects. EBV-mediated metabolic reprogramming enhances glycolytic activity, producing lactate that impairs anti-tumor immune responses while generating nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) to counteract oxidative stress during metastatic processes (Zhang et al., 2017). Persistent hyperglycemia supplies continuous metabolic fuel supporting proliferative activity. Lipid dysfunction facilitates enhanced fatty acid synthesis and oxidation, maintaining energy generation during metabolic stress conditions. Triglyceride-enriched lipoproteins deliver exogenous substrates through upregulated cellular receptors, supporting membrane biosynthesis or undergoing beta-oxidation to produce adenosine triphosphate (ATP) for invasive processes. Disrupted lipid homeostasis additionally provides ferroptosis resistance mechanisms.

The TyG index delivers distinctive clinical value by concurrently assessing both metabolic disturbances, providing integrated systemic dysfunction evaluation. Through incorporating fasting triglyceride and glucose—two routinely available parameters reflecting distinct yet interconnected metabolic abnormality dimensions—the TyG index achieves superior prognostic differentiation compared with individual component assessment. This integrative capability proves especially pertinent in NPC, where viral-induced metabolic alterations affect glycolytic and lipogenic networks, establishing a systemic metabolic environment the TyG index effectively quantifies (Zhang et al., 2017).

The identified prognostic relationships suggest promising therapeutic possibilities. The concept that pharmacologic TyG reduction might improve survival outcomes warrants rigorous prospective investigation. Multiple studies show metformin induces cell cycle arrest occurred at the G1 phase, inhibiting NPC growth, enhancing radiation sensitivity through DNA repair pathway disruption, and reversing cisplatin resistance via platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 (PECAM-1)-mediated multidrug resistance protein reduction (Zhao et al., 2011; Li et al., 2014; Sun et al., 2020). Similarly, statins demonstrate significant growth-inhibitory properties and enhance cisplatin effectiveness (Wang et al., 2011; Ma et al., 2019). These findings provide mechanistic rationale that targeting metabolic pathways reflected by TyG index may constitute promising therapeutic approaches for improving outcomes among patients displaying elevated metabolic dysregulation.

Several methodological limitations require consideration. First, the retrospective, single-center design introduces potential selection bias and limits generalizability across diverse populations. External validation through independent multicenter cohorts will prove essential for clinical implementation and enable assessment of model applicability across varied treatment protocols and geographical regions. Second, while numerous NPC prognostic models incorporate complex imaging parameters limiting practical applicability, the TyG index offers distinct advantages: derivation from standard pretreatment laboratory values, reflection of systemic metabolic status complementing tumor anatomy, and seamless integration into existing clinical workflows. Future comparative analyses evaluating TyG-based models versus comprehensive multivariable systems would clarify relative clinical utility. Third, absence of longitudinal TyG monitoring prevented evaluation of whether dynamic metabolic changes during treatment correlate with recurrence risk or therapeutic response. Future prospective studies should incorporate systematic serial TyG measurements at predetermined intervals to characterize temporal patterns and prognostic significance. Additionally, incomplete retrospective documentation of concurrent metabolic medication use precluded reliable assessment of potential confounding influences. Given substantial preclinical evidence suggesting these agents may influence NPC cellular behavior, future prospective investigations should document comprehensive medication histories and examine whether metabolic interventions differentially impact outcomes across TyG strata, potentially identifying high-risk subgroups most likely to benefit from metabolic optimization.

This investigation establishes the TyG index as a robust independent prognostic marker in NPC patients receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The index quantifies systemic metabolic dysregulation affecting tumor biology through multiple interconnected pathways, providing clinically meaningful prognostic information complementary to conventional anatomical staging. Further multicenter, prospective studies are needed to validate these findings and explore potential therapeutic interventions targeting metabolic pathways in this population.

5 Conclusion

In summary, the present study demonstrates the considerable prognostic relevance of the triglyceride-glucose index for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The TyG index is an independent and robust prognostic biomarker for overall survival, locoregional recurrence-free survival, and distant metastasis-free survival. The prognostic nomograms developed using the TyG index exhibited superior predictive performance compared to the conventional staging system. This highlights the potential of the TyG index as a valuable, easily accessible, and non-invasive tool for guiding individualized treatment choices and enhancing patient prognosis. Future investigative efforts are warranted to explore in detail how the TyG index may specifically mediate the customization of targeted therapeutic strategies and, consequently, influence the attainment of durable survival benefits in the context of NPC treatment paradigms.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The ethics committee/institutional review board waived the requirement of written informed consent for participation from the participants or the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin because the study was retrospective and used de-identified patient data.

Author contributions

XHa: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. FX: Formal Analysis, Writing – review and editing. X-XL: Formal Analysis, Software, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. Y-ML: Formal Analysis, Writing – review and editing. Z-QL: Formal Analysis, Writing – review and editing. S-FW: Formal Analysis, Writing – review and editing. F-FD: Formal Analysis, Writing – review and editing. CZ: Formal Analysis, Writing – review and editing. XHn: Formal Analysis, Writing – review and editing. WX: Formal Analysis, Writing – review and editing. W-CL: Formal Analysis, Writing – review and editing. A-QC: Formal Analysis, Writing – review and editing. D-HX: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Funding acquisition, Writing – review and editing. S-SD: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Funding acquisition, Writing – review and editing.

Funding

The authors declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 82172671 and 81972970 to Sha-Sha Du, and 82404187 to De-Huan Xie), as well as by the Supporting Research Fund for High-level Full-time Talents Introduction of Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital (Grant No. KY0120220119 to Sha-Sha Du).

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the patients who participated in this study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The authors declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2025.1716333/full#supplementary-material

SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE S1 | Determination of the cutoff value of TyG index according to maximally selected log-rank statistics.

References

Chen Y.-P., Chan A. T. C., Le Q.-T., Blanchard P., Sun Y., Ma J. (2019). Nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Lancet 394, 64–80. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30956-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Clayton P. E., Banerjee I., Murray P. G., Renehan A. G. (2011). Growth hormone, the insulin-like growth factor axis, insulin and cancer risk. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 7, 11–24. doi:10.1038/nrendo.2010.171

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

de Bono J., Lin C.-C., Chen L.-T., Corral J., Michalarea V., Rihawi K., et al. (2020). Two first-in-human studies of xentuzumab, a humanised insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-neutralising antibody, in patients with advanced solid tumours. Br. J. Cancer 122, 1324–1332. doi:10.1038/s41416-020-0774-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Djiogue S., Nwabo Kamdje A. H., Vecchio L., Kipanyula M. J., Farahna M., Aldebasi Y., et al. (2013). Insulin resistance and cancer: the role of insulin and IGFs. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 20, R1–R17. doi:10.1530/ERC-12-0324

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Er L.-K., Wu S., Chou H.-H., Hsu L.-A., Teng M.-S., Sun Y.-C., et al. (2016). Triglyceride glucose-body mass index is a simple and clinically useful surrogate marker for insulin resistance in nondiabetic individuals. PLoS One 11, e0149731. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0149731

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Esposito K., Chiodini P., Colao A., Lenzi A., Giugliano D. (2012). Metabolic syndrome and risk of cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Care 35, 2402–2411. doi:10.2337/dc12-0336

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Feng X., Lin J., Xing S., Liu W., Zhang G. (2017). Higher IGFBP-1 to IGF-1 serum ratio predicts unfavourable survival in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. BMC Cancer 17, 90. doi:10.1186/s12885-017-3068-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fritz J., Bjørge T., Nagel G., Manjer J., Engeland A., Häggström C., et al. (2020). The triglyceride-glucose index as a measure of insulin resistance and risk of obesity-related cancers. Int. J. Epidemiol. 49, 193–204. doi:10.1093/ije/dyz053

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Guerrero-Romero F., Simental-Mendía L. E., González-Ortiz M., Martínez-Abundis E., Ramos-Zavala M. G., Hernández-González S. O., et al. (2010). The product of triglycerides and glucose, a simple measure of insulin sensitivity. Comparison with the euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 95, 3347–3351. doi:10.1210/jc.2010-0288

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hothorn T., Zeileis A. (2008). Generalized maximally selected statistics. Biometrics 64, 1263–1269. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0420.2008.00995.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hua H., Kong Q., Yin J., Zhang J., Jiang Y. (2020). Insulin-like growth factor receptor signaling in tumorigenesis and drug resistance: a challenge for cancer therapy. J. Hematol. Oncol. 13, 64. doi:10.1186/s13045-020-00904-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hua X., Li W.-Z., Huang X., Wen W., Huang H.-Y., Long Z.-Q., et al. (2021). Modeling sarcopenia to predict survival for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Front. Oncol. 11, 625534. doi:10.3389/fonc.2021.625534

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huang S., Tan X., Feng P., Gong S., He Q., Zhu X., et al. (2021). Prognostic implication of metabolic syndrome in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a large institution-based cohort study from an endemic area. Cancer Manag. Res. 13, 9355–9366. doi:10.2147/CMAR.S336578

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Iwakiri D., Sheen T.-S., Chen J.-Y., Huang D. P., Takada K. (2005). Epstein-Barr virus-encoded small RNA induces insulin-like growth factor 1 and supports growth of nasopharyngeal carcinoma-derived cell lines. Oncogene 24, 1767–1773. doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1208357

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li H., Chen X., Yu Y., Wang Z., Zuo Y., Li S., et al. (2014). Metformin inhibits the growth of nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells and sensitizes the cells to radiation via inhibition of the DNA damage repair pathway. Oncol. Rep. 32, 2596–2604. doi:10.3892/or.2014.3485

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu Y.-Y., Lin S.-J., Chen Y.-Y., Liu L.-N., Bao L.-B., Tang L.-Q., et al. (2016). High-density lipoprotein cholesterol as a predictor of poor survival in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Oncotarget 7, 42978–42987. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.7160

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ma Z., Wang W., Zhang Y., Yao M., Ying L., Zhu L. (2019). Inhibitory effect of simvastatin in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. Exp. Ther. Med. 17, 4477–4484. doi:10.3892/etm.2019.7525

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

M’hamdi H., Baizig N. M., ELHadj O. E., M’hamdi N., Attia Z., Gritli S., et al. (2016). Usefulness of IGF-1 serum levels as diagnostic marker of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Immunobiology 221, 1304–1308. doi:10.1016/j.imbio.2016.05.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Simental-Mendía L. E., Rodríguez-Morán M., Guerrero-Romero F. (2008). The product of fasting glucose and triglycerides as surrogate for identifying insulin resistance in apparently healthy subjects. Metab. Syndr. Relat. Disord. 6, 299–304. doi:10.1089/met.2008.0034

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sun Y., Chen X., Zhou Y., Qiu S., Wu Y., Xie M., et al. (2020). Metformin reverses the drug resistance of cisplatin in irradiated CNE-1 human nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells through PECAM-1 mediated MRPs down-regulation. Int. J. Med. Sci. 17, 2416–2426. doi:10.7150/ijms.48635

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tseng K.-S., Lin C., Lin Y.-S., Weng S.-F. (2014). Risk of head and neck cancer in patients with diabetes mellitus: a retrospective cohort study in Taiwan. JAMA Otolaryngol. Head. Neck Surg. 140, 746–753. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2014.1258

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang W., Le W., Cho D.-Y., Hwang P. H., Upadhyay D. (2011). Novel effects of statins in enhancing efficacy of chemotherapy in vitro in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Int. Forum Allergy Rhinol. 1, 284–289. doi:10.1002/alr.20039

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang C.-T., Chen M.-Y., Guo X., Guo L., Mo H.-Y., Qian C.-N., et al. (2019a). Association between pretreatment serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and treatment outcomes in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with chemoradiotherapy: findings from a randomised trial. J. Cancer 10, 3618–3623. doi:10.7150/jca.32621

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang Z., Liu G., Mao J., Xie M., Zhao M., Guo X., et al. (2019b). IGF-1R inhibition suppresses cell proliferation and increases radiosensitivity in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. Mediat. Inflamm. 2019, 5497467. doi:10.1155/2019/5497467

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wong K. C. W., Hui E. P., Lo K.-W., Lam W. K. J., Johnson D., Li L., et al. (2021). Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an evolving paradigm. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 18, 679–695. doi:10.1038/s41571-021-00524-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang K., Hu Y., Feng Y., Li K., Zhu Z., Liu S., et al. (2024). IGF-1R mediates crosstalk between nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells and osteoclasts and promotes tumor bone metastasis. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 43, 46. doi:10.1186/s13046-024-02970-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yuan Y., Zhou X., Song J., Qiu X., Li J., Ye L., et al. (2008). Expression and clinical significance of epidermal growth factor receptor and type 1 insulin-like growth factor receptor in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 117, 192–200. doi:10.1177/000348940811700306

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang J., Jia L., Tsang C. M., Tsao S. W. (2017). EBV infection and glucose metabolism in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 1018, 75–90. doi:10.1007/978-981-10-5765-6_6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang A. M. Y., Wellberg E. A., Kopp J. L., Johnson J. D. (2021). Hyperinsulinemia in obesity, inflammation, and cancer. Diabetes Metab. J. 45, 285–311. doi:10.4093/dmj.2020.0250

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao L., Wen Z.-H., Jia C.-H., Li M., Luo S.-Q., Bai X.-C. (2011). Metformin induces G1 cell cycle arrest and inhibits cell proliferation in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. Anat. Rec. Hob. 294, 1337–1343. doi:10.1002/ar.21283

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: triglyceride-glucose index, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, concurrent chemoradiotherapy, prognosis, nomogram

Citation: Hua X, Xu F, Lin X-X, Lin Y-M, Long Z-Q, Wang S-F, Duan F-F, Zhang C, Huang X, Xia W, Li W-C, Chen A-Q, Xie D-H and Du S-S (2026) Assessing insulin resistance: the triglyceride-glucose index as a predictor of survival in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Front. Physiol. 16:1716333. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1716333

Received: 30 September 2025; Accepted: 24 November 2025;
Published: 05 January 2026.

Edited by:

Li Feng, Shanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital, China

Reviewed by:

Hailiang Wang, Qingdao University, China
Zhihua Pei, Huazhong Agricultural University, China

Copyright © 2026 Hua, Xu, Lin, Lin, Long, Wang, Duan, Zhang, Huang, Xia, Li, Chen, Xie and Du. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Sha-Sha Du, ZHVzczAyMDJAMTYzLmNvbQ==; Ao-Qiang Chen, Y2hlbmFvcUBzeXN1Y2Mub3JnLmNu; De-Huan Xie, eGllZGVodWFuQGdkcGgub3JnLmNu

These authors share first authorship

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.