Revisiting a 150-year-old conundrum on the role of Broca’s area in language processing: Embracing expected and unexpected results

About this Research Topic

Background

In the current topic we would like to address a longstanding conundrum in language sciences on the role that Broca’s area plays in language processing. This area was initially viewed as the seat of language production, later it became known as the hub for syntax and more recent proposals view it as a non-critical language region providing domain-general support for language processing. The controversy is partly due to evolving methods that increasingly allow us to get more accurate temporal and spatial information about the role that Broca’s area plays in language and cognition, forcing us to re-evaluate previous findings. Partly obfuscating the results is the lack of consensus regarding the anatomical definition of Broca’s area in the field, with a functional definition often implicitly assumed. Further, another contributing factor to the existing controversy, is the preponderance of positive findings skewing the current set of knowledge in science at large, and researchers being hesitant to report null or controversial results that undermine existing theories. In language sciences, many well-designed studies not showing the expected effect are never published despite a solid methodology and a strong theoretical background. Underreporting of negative and unexpected results introduces bias into the meta-analysis, engendering possibly inaccurate theories and misleading clinical guidance.

The goal of this Research Topic is to contribute to the longstanding debate surrounding the role of Broca’s area in language. We aim to accomplish this by explicitly including null and unexpected alongside expected results from language studies to provide a more comprehensive picture on the specific role (or lack thereof) of Broca’s region (defined as pars opercularis and pars triangularis, or BA 44 & 45) in language processing. Here we aim to provide a forum for sharing and discussing both positive, null, and unexpected findings using varied methods with the aim of forming a comprehensive understanding of the functional contributions of Broca’s area. By shifting the focus away from the significance of the results and instead refocusing it on the quality of the study design and rigor of execution, we as a field can be more knowledgeable of current developments. Embracing null or unexpected results from well-designed studies if interpreted correctly can convey critical information which can help scientists refine language theories and enable them to proactively modify their experiments considering previous null findings, helping the field to move forward faster.

The scope of this Research Topic is to provide a forum for sharing and discussing well-designed studies with both positive and negative findings investigating the functional role of Broca’s area (defined as pars opercularis and pars triangularis, or BA 44 & 45) in language processing. Papers can include different methods of behavioral and brain measurements in diverse populations. The manuscripts solicited in this issue are required to have well-designed tasks, a solid methodology, sufficient power, and adequate statistical models (for example, Bayesian modeling to assess the likelihood of absence of differences), along with clearly anatomically defining Broca’s area. Authors should highlight how the presented findings add to the ongoing debate on the functionality of Broca’s area, advance contemporary models of language processing and how future studies can expand on their work. We welcome submissions that include the following, and strongly encourage submissions related to the latter two bullet points:
• Positive findings (i.e., role of Broca’s area in an expected language ability ascertained)
• Null/negative findings (no relationship between Broca’s area and linguistic processing detected)
• Unexpected findings (i.e., Broca’s area was found to contribute to an unexpected ability).

Keywords: null results, language, neuroscience, neurolinguistics, syntax, domain-general, neuroimaging, electrophysiology, Broca's area

Important note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.

Frequently asked questions

• What is a Research Topic?

  Frontiers' Research Topics are collaborative hubs built around an emerging theme.Defined, managed, and led by renowned researchers, they bring communities together around a shared area of interest to stimulate collaboration and innovation.

  Unlike section journals, which serve established specialty communities, Research Topics are pioneer hubs, responding to the evolving scientific landscape and catering to new communities.

• Why does Frontiers publish Research Topics? 

  The goal of Frontiers' publishing program is to empower research communities to actively steer the course of scientific publishing. Our program was implemented as a three-part unit with fixed field journals, flexible specialty sections, and dynamically emerging Research Topics, connecting communities of different sizes and maturity.

  Research Topics originate from the scientific community. Many of our Research Topics are suggested by existing editorial board members who have identified critical challenges or areas of interest in their field.

• Why are Research Topics important for journals?

  As an editor, Research Topics will help you build your journal, as well as your community, around emerging, cutting-edge research. As research trailblazers, Research Topics attract high-quality submissions from leading experts all over the world.

  A thriving Research Topic can potentially evolve into a new specialty section if there is sustained interest and a growing community around it.

• How do we ensure the quality of articles within Research Topics?

  Each Research Topic must be approved by the specialty chief editor, and it falls under the editorial oversight of our editorial boards, supported by our in-house research integrity team. The same standards and rigorous peer review processes apply to articles published as part of a Research Topic as for any other article we publish.

  In 2023, 80% of the Research Topics we published were edited or co-edited by our editorial board members, who are already familiar with their journal's scope, ethos, and publishing model. All other topics are guest edited by leaders in their field, each vetted and formally approved by the specialty chief editor.

• What are the benefits of publishing my article in a Research Topic?

  Publishing your article within a Research Topic with other related articles increases its discoverability and visibility, which can lead to more views, downloads, and citations. Research Topics grow dynamically as more published articles are added, causing frequent revisiting, and further visibility.

  As Research Topics are multidisciplinary, they are cross-listed in several fields and section journals – increasing your reach even more and giving you the chance to expand your network and collaborate with researchers in different fields, all focusing on expanding knowledge around the same important topic.

  Our larger Research Topics are also converted into ebooks and receive social media promotion from our digital marketing team.

   
• What types of articles can be published in a Research Topic?

  Frontiers offers multiple article types, but it will depend on the field and section journals in which the Research Topic will be featured. The available article types for a Research Topic will appear in the drop-down menu during the submission process.

  Check available article types here 

• Can I suggest a new Research Topic? 

  Yes, we would love to hear your ideas for a topic. Most of our Research Topics are community-led and suggested by researchers in the field. Our in-house editorial team will contact you to talk about your idea and whether you’d like to edit the topic. If you’re an early-stage researcher, we will offer you the opportunity to coordinate your topic, with the support of a senior researcher as the topic editor. 

  Suggest your topic here 

• Who leads a Research Topic? 

  A team of guest editors (called topic editors) lead their Research Topic. This editorial team oversees the entire process, from the initial topic proposal to calls for participation, the peer review, and final publications.

  The team may also include topic coordinators, who help the topic editors send calls for participation, liaise with topic editors on abstracts, and support contributing authors. In some cases, they can also be assigned as reviewers.

• What is the role of a topic editor?

  As a topic editor (TE), you will take the lead on all editorial decisions for the Research Topic, starting with defining its scope. This allows you to curate research around a topic that interests you, bring together different perspectives from leading researchers across different fields and shape the future of your field. 

   

  You will choose your team of co-editors, curate a list of potential authors, send calls for participation and oversee the peer review process, accepting or recommending rejection for each manuscript submitted.

• What support will I receive when editing a new Research Topic? 

  As a topic editor, you're supported at every stage by our in-house team. You will be assigned a single point of contact to help you on both editorial and technical matters. Your topic is managed through our user-friendly online platform, and the peer review process is supported by our industry-first AI review assistant (AIRA).

• As a junior researcher, can I be involved in editing a Research Topic? 

  If you’re an early-stage researcher, we will offer you the opportunity to coordinate your topic, with the support of a senior researcher as the topic editor. This provides you with valuable editorial experience, improving your ability to critically evaluate research articles and enhancing your understanding of the quality standards and requirements for scientific publishing, as well as the opportunity to discover new research in your field, and expand your professional network.

• Can I get a certificate for editing a Research Topic?

  Yes, certificates can be issued on request. We are happy to provide a certificate for your contribution to editing a successful Research Topic.

• Who will I collaborate with?

  Research Topics thrive on collaboration and their multi-disciplinary approach around emerging, cutting-edge themes, attract leading researchers from all over the world.

• How long does it take to publish a Research Topic?

  As a topic editor, you can set the timeline for your Research Topic, and we will work with you at your pace. Typically, Research Topics are online and open for submissions within a few weeks and remain open for participation for 6 – 12 months. Individual articles within a Research Topic are published as soon as they are ready.

  Find out more about our Research Topics

• What fee support is available to authors publishing in a Research Topic?

  Our fee support program ensures that all articles that pass peer review, including those published in Research Topics, can benefit from open access – regardless of the author's field or funding situation.

  Authors and institutions with insufficient funding can apply for a discount on their publishing fees. A fee support application form is available on our website.

• Will there be a printed version of my Research Topic?

  In line with our mission to promote healthy lives on a healthy planet, we do not provide printed materials. All our articles and ebooks are available under a CC-BY license, so you can share and print copies.