Skip to main content

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Endocrinol.
Sec. Cancer Endocrinology
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1351624

Well-differentiated G1 and G2 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: A meta-analysis of published expanded DNA sequencing data

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
  • 2 Hans Christian Andersen Children's Hospital, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
  • 3 Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
  • 4 Odense Pancreas Center, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
  • 5 Department of Clinical Genetics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) can be non-functional or functional, snd sporadic or hereditary (primarily multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1). In the recent years, reports on genetic somatic events in both sporadic and hereditary PNETs have emerged, providing a basis for a more detailed molecular understanding of the pathophysiology. In this systematic meta-analysis review, we made a collation and statistical analysis of aggregated frequent genetic alterations and potential driver events in human G1/G2 PNETs. A systematic search was performed in concordance with the PRISMA guidelines. A PubMed search for studies using whole exome, whole genome, or targeted gene panel (+400 genes) sequencing of G1/G2 PNETs were conducted on September 23, 2023. Fourteen datasets were included on 225 PNETs, which were divided into subtypes. Further, non-functioning and functioning PNETs were distinguished into two groups for pathway evaluation. The collated genetical analyses were conducted using the 'maftools' R-package. Sporadic PNETs accounted 72.0% (162/225), hereditary PNETs 13.3% (30/225), unknown germline status 14.7% (33/225). The most frequently altered gene was MEN1, with somatic variants and copy number variations in overall 42 % (95/225); hereditary PNETs (germline variations in MEN1, VHL, Formateret: Haevet skrift CHEK2, BRCA2, PTEN, CDKN1B, and/or MUTYH) 57% (16/30); sporadic PNETs 36% (58/162); unknown germline status 64% (21/33). The MEN1 point mutations/indels were distributed throughout MEN1. Overall, DAXX (16%, 37/225) and ATRX-variants (12%, 27/225) were also abundant with missense mutations clustered in mutational hotspots associated with histone binding, and translocase activity, respectively. DAXX mutations occurred more frequently in PNETs with MEN1 mutations, p<0.05. While functioning PNETs shared few variated genes, non-functioning PNETs had more recurrent variations in genes associated with the Phosphoinositide 3-kinase, Wnt, NOTCH, and Receptor Tyrosine Kinase-Ras signaling onco-pathways.In conclusion, the somatic genetic alterations in G1/G2 PNETs are diverse, but with distinct differences between sporadic vs. hereditary, and functional vs. non-functional PNETs. Increased understanding of the genetic alterations may lead to identification of more drivers and driver hotspots in the tumorigenesis in well-differentiated PNETs, potentially giving a basis for new drug targets potentially giving a basis for the identification of new drug targets. (Funded by NNF19OC0057915).

    Keywords: pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors1, review2, genetics3, somatic4, gastroenteropancreatic5, meta-analysis6, PNET7, Knudson's two hit hypothesis8

    Received: 06 Dec 2023; Accepted: 02 May 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Andersen, Detlefsen, Brusgaard and Christesen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Henrik T. Christesen, Hans Christian Andersen Children's Hospital, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.