ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Genome Ed., 29 November 2021
Sec. Genome Editing in Plants
https://doi.org/10.3389/fgeed.2021.784233

Targeted Knockout of Eukaryotic Translation Initiation Factor 4E Confers Bymovirus Resistance in Winter Barley

www.frontiersin.orgRobert Eric Hoffie1, www.frontiersin.orgIngrid Otto1, www.frontiersin.orgDragan Perovic2, www.frontiersin.orgNagaveni Budhagatapalli1, www.frontiersin.orgAntje Habekuß2, www.frontiersin.orgFrank Ordon2 and www.frontiersin.orgJochen Kumlehn1*
  • 1Plant Reproductive Biology, Leibniz-Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), Gatersleben, Germany
  • 2Institute for Resistance Research and Stress Tolerance, Julius Kuehn Institute (JKI), Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Quedlinburg, Germany

The Eukaryotic Translation Initiation Factor 4E (EIF4E) is a well-known susceptibility factor for potyvirus infections in many plant species. The barley yellow mosaic virus disease, caused by the bymoviruses Barley yellow mosaic virus (BaYMV) and Barley mild mosaic virus (BaMMV), can lead to yield losses of up to 50% in winter barley. In autumn, the roots of young barley plants are infected by the soil-borne plasmodiophoraceous parasite Polymyxa graminis L. that serves as viral vector. Upon viral establishment and systemic spreading into the upper parts of the plants, yellow mosaics occur as first symptoms on leaves. In the further course of plant development, the disease entails leaf necrosis and increased susceptibility to frost damage. Thanks to the rym4 and rym5 allelic variants of the HvEIF4E gene, more than two thirds of current European winter barley cultivars are resistant to BaYMV and BaMMV. However, several strains of BaYMV and BaMMV have already overcome rym4- and rym5-mediated resistance. Accordingly, new resistance-conferring alleles are needed for barley breeding. Therefore, we performed targeted mutagenesis of the EIF4E gene by Cas9 endonuclease in BaMMV/BaYMV-susceptible winter barley cv. “Igri”. Small insertions were generated, resulting in a shift of the translational reading frame, thereby causing the loss-of-function of EIF4E. The mutations occurred in the homozygous state already in the primary mutants. Their progeny proved invariably homozygous and fully resistant to mechanical inoculation with BaMMV. EIF4E knockout plants showed normal growth habit and produced grains, yet exhibited a yield penalty.

Introduction

The Eukaryotic Translation Initiation Factor 4E (eIF4E) and its isoform [eIF(iso)4E] are known as susceptibility factors for potyvirus infection in a variety of plant species such as melon, tomato and pepper (Wang and Krishnaswamy, 2012). The eIF4E protein interacts with the 5′ 7-methylguanosine (m7G) cap of eukaryotic mRNA to recruit the translation complex for protein biosynthesis. Potyviruses are single stranded (+)RNA viruses that mimic the structure of the eukaryotic mRNA’s m7G cap by their genome-linked viral protein (VPg) cap, thus taking advantage of host metabolism for translation of their RNA (Sanfaçon, 2015). The plasmodiophorid Polymyxa graminis serves as a vector of Barley yellow mosaic virus (BaYMV) and Barley mild mosaic virus (BaMMV), both of which are bymoviruses of the Potyvirideae family. P. graminis transmits these viruses mainly to winter barley seedlings, particularly under cool and moist weather conditions in autumn, which results in high yield losses and renders bymoviruses major pathogens in Europe and Asia. Barley was among the first species in which resistance-mediating alleles of the EIF4E gene were described and utilized in breeding (Kanyuka et al., 2005; Stein et al., 2005). The rym4 and rym5 alleles of HvEIF4E carry mutations that result in amino acid changes in the binding domain of the encoded protein. Consequently, the interaction between the host’s eIF4E and the viral RNA cap-like structure formed by the genome-linked viral protein (VPg), is hampered, thereby preventing the translation of viral RNA and thus the replication and spread of the virus in the plant (Li and Shirako, 2015). In total, seven allelic variants of the EIF4E gene have been shown to confer resistance to different isolates of the BaMMV/BaYMV complex [reviewed in Jiang et al. (2020)]. Based upon this principle, barley cultivars resistant to BaYMV and BaMMV have been bred and widely grown in temperate climate regions. However, the comprehensively used rym4- and rym5-based resistances have already been overcome by some strains such as BaYMV-2 (overcoming rym4) as well as BaMMV-Sil and BaMMV-Teik (overcoming rym5) (Habekuss et al., 2008; Jiang et al., 2020). Consequently, there is an urgent need for new resistance-conferring HvEIF4E alleles or novel resistance mechanisms, especially in winter barley breeding. Besides the EIF4E alleles rym4 and rym5, several other bymovirus resistance loci have been described in barley [reviewed in Jiang et al. (2020)]. Most of these are recessive and were found in Asian landraces. However, only for rym1/rym11, the responsible gene, i.e., the Protein Disulfide Isomerase-Like 5-1 (PDIL5-1), has been identified (Yang et al., 2014). Nevertheless, winter barley breeding still relies on rym4 and rym5, since the introduction of new resistance sources into current elite lines requires time-consuming backcrosses. Taking advantage of the CRISPR-associated (Cas) endonuclease technology (Koeppel et al., 2019), targeted knock-outs of EIF4E were reported to be associated with Potyvirus resistance in other plant species such as cucumber and cassava (Chandrasekaran et al., 2016; Gomez et al., 2019). In barley, however, only non-synonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been described that lead to amino acid changes in the mRNA cap-binding domain of eIF4E. Therefore, it is assumed that the loss-of-function of EIF4E might be lethal in barley even though HvEIF(iso)4E does exist as a conserved paralog (Yang et al., 2016). Here, we addressed four positions in the EIF4E gene previously described to carry different SNPs in the rym4 and rym5 resistance alleles of the virus-susceptible winter barley cv. “Igri” using Cas9 and accordingly customized guide RNAs (gRNAs). Via Agrobacterium-mediated DNA transfer to embryogenic pollen cultures, target motif-specific mutant plants were generated and their progeny were tested for resistance against BaMMV.

Materials and Methods

Target Selection

As targets for Cas9-induced mutagenesis, regions within the HvEIF4E gene (Gene ID: 100527994) on Chromosome 3 were selected, in which previously non-synonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been described for the resistance-conferring rym4 and rym5 alleles which are, respectively, associated with four and three SNPs (see Figure 1A). The aim was to induce knockout mutations as well as new alleles by random nucleobase exchanges at the target sites. Within the four target regions, target motifs were selected based on available NGG protospacer-adjacent motifs (PAM). Target motifs including their PAMs are shown in Figure 1B. An off-target analysis was performed by comparison of the selected target motifs with the barley reference genome “Morex” Version 3 and the pan-genome sequence of “Igri” using the GrainGenes BLAST Service (Priyam et al., 2019). Only for target motif 3, a similar sequence is present on Chromosome 1 but a 2-bp mismatch within the seed region renders this sequence a rather unlikely off-target. For target motifs 1, 2, and 4, no potential off-targets were identified in the “Morex” genome v3 (see Suppl. S1).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 1. (A) Gene structure of EIF4E, positions of previously described single nucleotide polymorphisms in rym4 and rym5 resistance alleles and positions of Cas9/gRNA target motifs for site-directed mutagenesis in Hordeum vulgare. Targets indicated by scissors symbols, genomic EIF4E sequence shown by grey line and exons by grey boxes. (B) Summary of target sequences, results of protoplast-based pre-validation of mutation efficiency, number of regenerated plants upon Agrobacterium-mediated DNA transfer to embryogenic pollen cultures of winter barley cv. “Igri”, and mutant plants detected amongst transgenic regenerants.

Vector Cloning

The target-specific sequences of the four gRNAs (see Figure 1B; Supplementary Table S1) were ordered as forward and reverse DNA oligo-nucleotides, hybridized and individually cloned in the format of double-stranded DNA into the plasmid pSH121 [GeneBank-ID: MW145140.1; Gerasimova et al. (2018)]. This generic vector contains the Oryza sativa U3 (OsU3) promoter in front of a gRNA scaffold as well as the maize codon-optimized cas9 gene under control of the Zea mays Polyubiquitin 1 (ZmUBI1) promoter. From each target-specific pSH121 derivative named pInt_EIF4E_TM1, pInt_EIF4E_TM2, pInt_EIF4E_TM3, and pInt_EIF4E_TM4, the SfiI fragment including the gRNA and cas9 expression units was transferred into the binary vector p6i-2x35S-TE9 (Gerasimova et al., 2020) that carries in its transfer-DNA an hpt gene under the control of a doubled-enhanced CaMV35S promoter for plant selection, resulting in the respective binary vectors pBin_EIF4E_TM1, pBin_EIF4E_TM2, pBin_EIF4E_TM3, and pBin_EIF4E_TM4.

Pre-Validation of Constructs via Protoplast Transformation

The intermediate pSH121 derivatives were first tested by transient expression in mesophyll protoplasts isolated from leaves of one week-old, etiolated seedlings of winter barley cv. “Igri” based on the protocol of Shan et al. (2014). In brief, thirty leaves of barley seedlings were chopped into small fragments using a razor blade, and cell walls were digested with Macerozyme R-10 and cellulase R-10 (DUCHEFA BIOCHEMIE B.V, Haarlem/Netherlands). Protoplasts were purified by sieving, and after PEG-mediated transformation with pInt_EIF4E_TM1 to pInt_EIF4E_TM4, they were incubated for 60 h at 21°C in the dark. All protoplast transformations were conducted in three replications. To check for transformation efficiency, a GFP construct was used to transform a control sample of protoplasts. After incubation, the GFP expressing portion of protoplasts of this control sample was determined using an epifluorescence microscope (AX200M, Zeiss, Oberkochen/Germany), and DNA was extracted from the other protoplast samples transformed using the intermediate cas9/gRNA constructs pInt_EIF4E_TM1, pInt_EIF4E_TM2, pInt_EIF4E_TM3, and pInt_EIF4E_TM4. Around 150 bp of the target regions were amplified using specific primers (see Supplementary Table S1), followed by deep-sequencing of amplicons, which was performed by a commercial service provider on an Illumina MiSeq platform. Mutation efficiencies were calculated individually for each replicate as proportion of sequencing reads with mutation in relation to the total number of reads including those with the wild-type sequence.

Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation Using Embryogenic Barley Pollen

The binary vectors pBin_EIF4E_TM1, pBin_EIF4E_TM2, and pBin_EIF4E_TM3 were transfected by electroporation into the Agrobacterium strain LBA4404 harboring the hypervirulence-conferring plasmid pSB1 (Kumlehn et al., 2006). In brief, pre-mitotic (highly vacuolated) microspores were isolated from winter barley cv. “Igri”. After microspore cultivation for 1 week in KBP medium (macro and micro nutrients, L-glutamine and maltose) to initiate cell proliferation, resultant embryogenic pollen were subjected to DNA transfer by co-cultivation with Agrobacterium carrying the binary vectors as mentioned above in CK medium (macro and micro nutrients, maltose, acetosyringone, MES, and phosphate buffer). Then, transgenic plantlets were generated from embryogenic structures cultivated on KBP4PT (macro and micro nutrients, L-glutamine, maltose, hygromycin, Timentin, and Phytagel) followed by K4NBT medium (macro and micro nutrients, with increased dosage of CuSO4, L-glutamine, maltose, hygromycin, Timentin, and Phytagel) under hygromycin selection as previously described in detail by Kumlehn et al. (2006).

Genotyping of Primary Transgenics and Mutants

Leaf samples were taken from primary transgenic plants and DNA was extracted and analyzed for the presence of the cas9 transgene by PCR using specific primers (see Supplementary Table S1). The plants were screened for mutations by PCR amplification of the target regions using specific primers (see Supplementary Table S1) followed by Sanger sequencing of the amplicons.

BaMMV Inoculation and Resistance Screening by DAS-ELISA

To screen progeny of primary mutants P1, P3, and P4 for Bymovirus resistance, plants were mechanically inoculated with BaMMV according to a protocol of Habekuss et al. (2008) which had been established as a more reliable alternative to vector-mediated virus infection using the soil-borne plasmodiophorid Polymyxa graminis. Depending on the number of grains obtained from primary mutants, 13, 9, and 16 M2 siblings were grown and screened (see Figure 2C). For this purpose, a total of 38 seedlings were cultivated in a growth chamber at 12°C and 16 h photoperiod and inoculated twice with an interval of five to 7 days at the three-leaf stage with leaf sap of BaMMV-ASL-infected barley plants. Six to 8 weeks after the first inoculation, visible symptoms as shown in Figure 2B were assessed. Additionally, the plants were screened for virus particles by double-antibody sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (DAS-ELISA). Plants exhibiting an extinction E405 of 0.1 or below were considered resistant to BaMMV. Simultaneously, DNA was extracted from leaf samples of all test plants, PCR was performed for the cas9 transgene and the target region was amplified and sequenced as described above. As control, non-transformed (non-edited) “Igri’ plants, referred to as “wild-type”, were included to the tests.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 2. (A) Mesophyll protoplasts of winter barley cv. “Igri” after PEG-mediated transformation with a GFP-carrying vector, after 60 h of incubation at 21°C. These protoplasts serving as positive control for viability and genetic transformation, respectively, were recorded using bright field (left) and epifluorescence (right) microscopy. (B) Deep-sequencing of amplicons of target region 1 after transformation of barley protoplasts using vectors carrying cas9 and target motif 1-specific gRNA expression units. (C) Chromatograms of Sanger sequencing target region 1 of wild-type “Igri” as compared with primary mutant plants. The unambiguous DNA sequence indicates homozygosity of the inserted A nucleotide. Grey vertical bars: cleavage positions, horizontal lines: deletions, red letters: insertions, wt: wild-type sequence, target motifs underlined with PAMs being double underlined, +A: 1-bp insertion of adenine nucleobase, +T: 1-bp insertion of thymine nucleobase.

Yield Data

After resistance screening, M2 plants were cultivated in a glasshouse with 18–20°C/ 12–14°C day/night with 16 h light to maturity, harvested and ears were threshed. The total grain number of each individual plant was counted and total grain weight was measured. Thousand grain weight (TGW) was calculated as

TGW=GrainweightGrainnumber1000

An analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Post-Hoc Test (Tukey HSD) were performed using the statistics software R version 3.6.1 (R Core Team, 2019). Plots were generated with R package ggplot2 (Wickham, 2016).

Results

After cloning pInt_EIF4E_TM1, pInt_EIF4E_TM2, pInt_EIF4E_TM3, and pInt_EIF4E_TM4 bearing cas9 and target motif-specified gRNA expression units, a barley protoplast-based test assay was performed to pre-validate the construct performance in terms of mutagenesis efficiency. After transformation and incubation of protoplasts (see Figure 3A), their genomic DNA was extracted and PCR amplicons of target regions were deep-sequenced. For each target motif, several hundred reads were obtained. The alignment of the sequencing reads to the “Morex” reference sequence revealed that the proportions of mutated sequence reads related to the total read numbers (including wild-type) were as high as 17.1%, with the best results being achieved in target motif 1 (see Figure 1B). The most frequent mutations observed in protoplasts were small deletions of 1–5 base pairs or insertions of one base pair (A or T) at the expected Cas9 cleavage site residing three to four base pairs upstream of the protospacer-adjacent motif (PAM) (Jinek et al., 2012) as shown in Figure 3B. Unfortunately, only after sequencing, the PAM of target motif 4 was found to be unsuitable, because it features a single nucleotide polymorphism in “Igri” as compared to the barley genomic reference sequences of cv. “Morex”.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 3. (A) Healthy leaf of winter barley “Igri” approximately 2 months after sowing. (B) Symptoms of Barley Mild Mosaic Virus (BaMMV) infection 7 weeks after mechanical inoculation of wild-type “Igri”. (C) Results from mechanical BaMMV inoculation of M2 plants followed by DAS-ELISA for detection of virus particles and concomitant molecular characterization of mutation status. All M2 plants carried the same mutation as their parental plant, confirming homozygosity of the latter. All mutants proved resistant against BaMMV infection.

After cloning the binary vectors pBin_EIF4E_TM1, pBin_EIF4E_TM2, and pBin_EIF4E_TM3 with the expression cassettes for cas9 and the gRNAs against target motifs 1, 2, and 3, Agrobacterium-mediated DNA transfer to embryogenic pollen cultures of winter barley cv. “Igri” was used to produce transgenic plants. Addressing target motifs 1, 2, and 3, four, twenty-seven and fifty primary transgenic plants were obtained from one, five and one transformation experiments, respectively. All regenerated plants were PCR-positive for the cas9 gene and were subjected to Sanger sequencing of the addressed target motifs. Whereas independent 1-bp insertions of T or A were found three base pairs upstream of the PAM in each of the four plants carrying pBin_EIF4E_TM1 (see Figure 3C), no mutations whatsoever were detected in plants transformed using pBin_EIF4E_TM2 and pBin_EIF4E_TM3. The undisturbed chromatograms obtained for the four primary mutant plants were taken as indication for homozygosity of the induced mutations. Progenies of three independent primary mutants were genotyped by PCR screening for the cas9 transgene and by Sanger sequencing of the target region. All individuals carried the same mutations known from their respective parent, thereby confirming its homozygous state. In addition, these M2 plants were mechanically inoculated with BaMMV, whereby all of them proved resistant to the infection (see Figure 2C).

The insertion of one base pair at position 169 of the EIF4E coding sequence results in a shift of the reading frame during translation of the mRNA, which itself causes a non-sense amino acid sequence downstream of this insertion site including a premature stop codon at position 306 (after approx. one third) of the coding sequence (see Supplementary Material).

Yield was assessed based on thousand-grain weight and grain number per plant (GNP) of the three analyzed M2 families. The thousand-grain weight of the mutant families P1 (mean 46 g, ±3.5), P3 (47 g ± 3.1), and P4 (45.7 g, ±2.4) was on a par with that of non-mutated, transgenic segregants from a similar experiment (50.7 g, ±4.9) and of “Igri” wild-type (48.9 g, ±3.2) grown under the same glasshouse conditions (see Figure 4A; Supplementary Table S2). According to a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test, no significant differences in the thousand-grain weight were observed (p ≥ 0.05). However, the total grain yield per plant was decreased owing to a reduction in the number of grains produced per plant. This phenomenon was consistent across all three analyzed mutant lines (P1: 72 grains, ±29; P3: 79 grains, ±25; P4: 72 grains, ±30) which were compared to wild-type (220 grains, ±59) and non-mutated segregants (198, ±37) (p < 0.001; see Figure 4B; Supplementary Table S2).

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 4. (A) Thousand-grain weight of three M2 populations (9–16 siblings each), compared to non-mutated segregants from a comparable transformation experiment (n = 5) and “Igri” wild-type (n = 8), grown under the same conditions. Black dots show the average weights of 1,000 grains in g, error bars indicate standard errors. Statistically significant differences were not detectable (Tukey’s test, p ≥ 0.05). (B) Total number of grains per plant of three M2 populations (9–16 siblings each), compared to non-mutated segregants from a comparable transformation experiment (n = 5) and “Igri” wild-type (n = 8), grown under the same conditions. Black dots show the average numbers of grains per plant, error bars indicate standard errors. Samples without statistically significant differences (Tukey’s test, p > 0.8) are indicated by same letters, statistically significant differences between the two groups indicated by ‘***’ (Tukey’s test, p < 0.0001).

Discussion

The pre-validation of cas9/gRNA constructs via protoplast assay proved conclusive for targeted mutagenesis at the whole-plant level. Notably, comparatively low mutation rates were expected, because targeting specifically those regions known for resistance-conferring mutations required trade-offs with respect to some efficiency-related criteria for the selection of target motifs (Kumlehn et al., 2018). Target motifs 2 and 3 showed zero to very low mutation rates in protoplasts and so they did in cas9/gRNA transgenic plants. Positional effects might have played a role, since both target motifs mutated with low efficiencies are located close to each other on exons 2 and 3. Furthermore, the protospacer-adjacent motif (PAM) of target motif 4 was found to be unsuitable only after sequencing, because it features a single nucleotide polymorphism in “Igri” as compared to the barley genomic reference sequences that were used for target motif selection (see also Supplementary Material). For target motif 1, the insertions found in transgenic plants were also amongst the most frequent mutations detected in the respective protoplast assay (see Figure 3B). The mutations proved instantly homozygous in all four primary transgenic plants, most likely due to the particularity of the applied transformation method which involves gene transfer to haploid cells followed by whole-genome duplication (Kumlehn et al., 2006; see Figures 2C, 3C). To the best of our knowledge, this represents the first example of generating homozygous mutations via transfer of cas9/gRNA-encoding DNA to haploid cells that are capable of giving rise to (doubled haploid) plants. This enables us to evaluate phenotypes of homozygous mutants already in early generations after transformation. As a trade-off, these plants are most likely also homozygous for the cas9/gRNA-transgene. However, this disadvantage is considered irrelevant in the scientific exemplification demonstrated in the present study, in which also a rather outdated barley cultivar was used to take advantage of its amenability to genetic transformation. Moreover, there is the option of crossing these mutants with wild-type plants, followed by selfing of F1 plants, which would readily result in T-DNA-free segregants that still carry the mutated eif4e allele in the homozygous state. Also, the mutation at the target motif itself prevents the occurrence of new mutation events by disturbing the gRNA to bind to the target sequence. To exclude any effects of the transgene itself, five non-mutated plants carrying events of the same transgene except from the 20 bp target-specific gRNA sequence were used as control and their grain yield was on a par with that of “Igri” wild-type plants.

The one-base pair insertion between position 169 and 170 in the EIF4E coding sequence (position 400-401 in the genomic sequence) causes a frameshift in the translational reading frame, resulting not only in a nonsense amino acid sequence downstream of the mutation, but also in a premature stop codon at position 265 bp of the coding sequence (see Supplementary Material). Consequently, the resultant protein sequence is non-functional with very high certainty. Owing to the loss-of-function of the eIF4E protein, the plant lacks one of its most important interaction partners for bymoviruses (Wang and Krishnaswamy, 2012). That mechanism has been reported to confer broad resistance to several bymoviruses in a number of dicotyledonous plants as, for instance, cucumber, tomato and Arabidopsis (Chandrasekaran et al., 2016; Pyott et al., 2016; Atarashi et al., 2020; Moury et al., 2020). However, in a temperate cereal such as barley, the full knock-out of EIF4E was rather expected to be lethal; Yang et al. (2016) screened over 2,900 wild and domesticated barley accessions and identified 65 haplotypes for HvEIF4E, of which 19 were associated with resistance to bymoviruses. The allelic diversity included various non-synonymous point mutations, whereas knockout alleles were not present. Hence, it was concluded that a knockout of HvEIF4E cannot be complemented by its paralogue HvEIF(iso)4E without disadvantage for the plants. Hofinger et al. (2011) described the haplotype diversity of EIF4E in barley in comparison to its paralogue EIF(iso)4E. While a rather high diversity was described for the first, most likely due to positive selection pressure by co-evolution with bymoviruses, rather low haplotype diversity was found for the latter, suggesting different functions of EIF4E and EIF(iso)4E in barley. Nevertheless, during our experiments in climate chamber and glasshouse, HvEIF4E knockout plants grew vigorously and produced grains. However, the total number of grains per plant was significantly affected. Previous publications on targeted EIF4E knockouts with resulting resistance to Potyviruses in other plant species unfortunately did not contain yield data to refer to here (Chandrasekaran et al., 2016; Gomez et al., 2019). Since isogenic wild-type lines for barley accessions with rym4- or rym5-mediated resistance are not yet available, it is not even known whether these widely used resistances are associated with yield reduction. The results of our study need confirmation under field conditions to elucidate whether the eif4e knockout represents a viable novel source of resistance to bymoviruses in barley, which most likely, in contrast to rym4 and rym5 and the other alleles known at this locus, may be effective to all strains of BaMMV and BaYMV. In the event that the yield penalty seen in the present investigation will be confirmed under field conditions, the option remains for future biotechnological approaches to generate mutant alleles with sufficient functionality for the plant by inducing in-frame mutations, such as via base editing, so that a recruitment of the corresponding gene products by bymoviruses is no longer possible.

The availability of eif4e knockout mutants further offers the opportunity to dissect the effects of the individual SNPs jointly present in the rym4- and rym5-alleles as well as to elucidate the impact of various EIF4E alleles on yield, which could be achieved via complementation using synthetic alleles each carrying only one of those SNPs or various combinations thereof. The identification of effective SNPs will facilitate further efforts to generate novel resistance-conferring alleles by precise genome editing approaches.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author Contributions

DP, JK, and FO conceived the project and acquired the funding. JK, RH, DP devised the experimental setup. RH, IO, DP, NB, and AH performed the experiments and analyzed the data. RH wrote the article, JK, FO, and DP edited the article. All authors approved the article.

Funding

The research was funded in frame of the IdeMoDeResBar project (FKZ 031B0199 (phase 1) and 031B0887 (phase 2)) by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Science (BMBF).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Carola Bollmann, Ingrid Dubsky, and Katy Niedung for excellent technical assistance.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgeed.2021.784233/full#supplementary-material

References

Atarashi, H., Jayasinghe, W. H., Kwon, J., Kim, H., Taninaka, Y., Igarashi, M., et al. (2020). Artificially Edited Alleles of the Eukaryotic Translation Initiation Factor 4E1 Gene Differentially Reduce Susceptibility to Cucumber Mosaic Virus and Potato Virus Y in Tomato. Front. Microbiol. 11, 564310. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2020.564310

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chandrasekaran, J., Brumin, M., Wolf, D., Leibman, D., Klap, C., Pearlsman, M., et al. (2016). Development of Broad Virus Resistance in Non-Transgenic Cucumber Using CRISPR/Cas9 Technology. Mol. Plant Pathol. 17, 1140–1153. doi:10.1111/mpp.12375

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gerasimova, S. V., Hertig, C., Korotkova, A. M., Kolosovskaya, E. V., Otto, I., Hiekel, S., et al. (2020). Conversion of Hulled into Naked Barley by Cas Endonuclease-Mediated Knockout of the NUD Gene. BMC Plant Biol. 20, 255. doi:10.1186/s12870-020-02454-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gerasimova, S. V., Korotkova, A. M., Hertig, C., Hiekel, S., Hoffie, R., Budhagatapalli, N., et al. (2018). Targeted Genome Modifcation in Protoplasts of a Highly Regenerable Siberian Barley Cultivar Using RNA-Guided Cas9 Endonuclease. Vestn. Vogis 22, 1033–1039. doi:10.18699/VJ18.447

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gomez, M. A., Lin, Z. D., Moll, T., Chauhan, R. D., Hayden, L., Renninger, K., et al. (2019). Simultaneous CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Editing of Cassava eIF4E Isoforms nCBP-1 and nCBP-2 Reduces Cassava Brown Streak Disease Symptom Severity and Incidence. Plant Biotechnol. J. 17, 421–434. doi:10.1111/pbi.12987

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Habekuss, A., Kühne, T., Krämer, I., Rabenstein, F., Ehrig, F., Ruge-Wehling, B., et al. (2008). Identification of Barley Mild Mosaic Virus Isolates in Germany Breaking Rym5 Resistance. J. Phytopathol 156 (1), 36–41. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0434.2007.01324.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hofinger, B. J., Russell, J. R., Bass, C. G., Baldwin, T., dos Reis, M., Hedley, P. E., et al. (2011). An Exceptionally High Nucleotide and Haplotype Diversity and a Signature of Positive Selection for the eIF4E Resistance Gene in Barley Are Revealed by Allele Mining and Phylogenetic Analyses of Natural Populations. Mol. Ecol. 20, 3653–3668. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05201.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jiang, C., Kan, J., Ordon, F., Perovic, D., and Yang, P. (2020). Bymovirus-induced Yellow Mosaic Diseases in Barley and Wheat: Viruses, Genetic Resistances and Functional Aspects. Theor. Appl. Genet. 133, 1623–1640. doi:10.1007/s00122-020-03555-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jinek, M., Chylinski, K., Fonfara, I., Hauer, M., Doudna, J. A., and Charpentier, E. (2012). A Programmable Dual-RNA-Guided DNA Endonuclease in Adaptive Bacterial Immunity. Science 337, 816–821. doi:10.1126/science.1225829

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kanyuka, K., Druka, A., Caldwell, D. G., Tymon, A., McCallum, N., Waugh, R., et al. (2005). Evidence that the Recessive Bymovirus Resistance Locus Rym4 in Barley Corresponds to the Eukaryotic Translation Initiation Factor 4E Gene. Mol. Plant Pathol. 6, 449–458. doi:10.1111/j.1364-3703.2005.00294.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Koeppel, I., Hertig, C., Hoffie, R., and Kumlehn, J. (2019). Cas Endonuclease Technology-A Quantum Leap in the Advancement of Barley and Wheat Genetic Engineering. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20, 2647. doi:10.3390/ijms20112647

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kumlehn, J., Pietralla, J., Hensel, G., Pacher, M., and Puchta, H. (2018). The CRISPR/Cas Revolution Continues: From Efficient Gene Editing for Crop Breeding to Plant Synthetic Biology. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 60, 1127–1153. doi:10.1111/jipb.12734

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kumlehn, J., Serazetdinova, L., Hensel, G., Becker, D., and Loerz, H. (2006). Genetic Transformation of Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) via Infection of Androgenetic Pollen Cultures with Agrobacterium Tumefaciens. Plant Biotechnol. J. 4, 251–261. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7652.2005.00178.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, H., and Shirako, Y. (2015). Association of VPg and eIF4E in the Host Tropism at the Cellular Level of Barley Yellow Mosaic Virus and Wheat Yellow Mosaic Virus in the Genus Bymovirus. Virology 476, 159–167. doi:10.1016/j.virol.2014.12.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Moury, B., Lebaron, C., Szadkowski, M., Ben Khalifa, M., Girardot, G., Bolou Bi, B. A., et al. (2020). Knock-Out Mutation of Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 4E2 (eIF4E2) Confers Resistance to Pepper Veinal Mottle Virus in Tomato. Virology 539, 11–17. doi:10.1016/j.virol.2019.09.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Priyam, A., Woodcroft, B. J., Rai, V., Moghul, I., Munagala, A., Ter, F., et al. (2019). Sequenceserver: A Modern Graphical User Interface for Custom BLAST Databases. Mol. Biol. Evol. 36, 2922–2924. doi:10.1093/molbev/msz185

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pyott, D. E., Sheehan, E., and Molnar, A. (2016). Engineering of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated Potyvirus Resistance in Transgene-free Arabidopsis Plants. Mol. Plant Pathol. 17, 1276–1288. doi:10.1111/mpp.12417

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

R Core Team (2019). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.

Google Scholar

Sanfaçon, H. (2015). Plant Translation Factors and Virus Resistance. Viruses 7, 3392–3419. doi:10.3390/v7072778

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shan, Q., Wang, Y., Li, J., and Gao, C. (2014). Genome Editing in Rice and Wheat Using the CRISPR/Cas System. Nat. Protoc. 9, 2395–2410. doi:10.1038/nprot.2014.157

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stein, N., Perovic, D., Kumlehn, J., Pellio, B., Stracke, S., Streng, S., et al. (2005). The Eukaryotic Translation Initiation Factor 4E Confers Multiallelic Recessive Bymovirus Resistance in Hordeum vulgare (L.). Plant J. 42, 912–922. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02424.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, A., and Krishnaswamy, S. (2012). Eukaryotic Translation Initiation Factor 4E-Mediated Recessive Resistance to Plant Viruses and its Utility in Crop Improvement. Mol. Plant Pathol. 13, 795–803. doi:10.1111/j.1364-3703.2012.00791.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wickham, H. (2016). ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Cham: Springer.

Google Scholar

Yang, P., Habekuß, A., Hofinger, B. J., Kanyuka, K., Kilian, B., Graner, A., et al. (2016). Sequence Diversification in Recessive Alleles of Two Host Factor Genes Suggests Adaptive Selection for Bymovirus Resistance in Cultivated Barley from East Asia. Theor. Appl. Genet. 130, 331–344. doi:10.1007/s00122-016-2814-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, P., Lüpken, T., Habekuss, A., Hensel, G., Steuernagel, B., Kilian, B., et al. (2014). Protein Disulfide Isomerase Like 5-1 Is a Susceptibility Factor to Plant Viruses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 111, 2104–2109. doi:10.1073/pnas.1320362111

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: Cas9, CRISPR, genome editing, RNA-guided endonucleases, targeted mutagenesis, protoplasts, doubled haploid

Citation: Hoffie RE, Otto I, Perovic D, Budhagatapalli N, Habekuß A, Ordon F and Kumlehn J (2021) Targeted Knockout of Eukaryotic Translation Initiation Factor 4E Confers Bymovirus Resistance in Winter Barley. Front.Genome Ed. 3:784233. doi: 10.3389/fgeed.2021.784233

Received: 27 September 2021; Accepted: 04 November 2021;
Published: 29 November 2021.

Edited by:

Felicity J. Keiper, BASF, Australia

Reviewed by:

Vladimir Nekrasov, Rothamsted Research, United Kingdom
Jaindra Nath Tripathi, International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Kenya
Wendy Harwood, John Innes Centre, United Kingdom

Copyright © 2021 Hoffie, Otto, Perovic, Budhagatapalli, Habekuß, Ordon and Kumlehn. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Jochen Kumlehn, kumlehn@ipk-gatersleben.de

ORCID ID: Robert Eric Hoffie, orcid.org/0000-0003-1013-6027; Dragan Perovic, orcid.org/0000-0002-0292-1693; Nagaveni Budhagatapalli, orcid.org/0000-0002-5537-8276; Frank Ordon, orcid.org/0000-0002-1695-6395; Jochen Kumlehn, orcid.org/0000-0001-7080-7983

Download