Impact Factor 4.716
2018 JCR, Web of Science Group 2019

Frontiers journals are at the top of citation and impact metrics

Original Research ARTICLE

Front. Immunol., 28 February 2018 |

Transcription Factor KLF10 Constrains IL-17-Committed Vγ4+ γδ T Cells

imageGirak Kim1, imageMin Jeong Gu1, imageSoo Ji Kim1, imageKwang Hyun Ko1, imageYoon-Chul Kye1, imageCheol Gyun Kim1, imageJae-Ho Cho2, imageWoon-Kyu Lee3, imageKi-Duk Song4, imageHyuk Chu5, imageYeong-Min Park6, imageSeung Hyun Han7 and imageCheol-Heui Yun1,8,9*
  • 1Department of Agricultural Biotechnology and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
  • 2Academy of Immunology and Microbiology, Institute for Basic Science, Pohang, South Korea
  • 3College of Medicine, Inha University, Incheon, South Korea
  • 4Department of Animal Biotechnology, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju, South Korea
  • 5Division of Bacterial Disease Research, Center for Infectious Disease Research, National Institute of Health, Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Osong, South Korea
  • 6Department of Immunology, Laboratory of Dendritic Cell Differentiation and Regulation, School of Medicine, Konkuk University, Chungju, South Korea
  • 7Department of Oral Microbiology and Immunology, DRI and BK21 Plus Program, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
  • 8Center for Food Bioconvergence, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
  • 9Institute of Green Bio Science Technology, Seoul National University, Pyeongchang, South Korea

γδ T cells, known to be an important source of innate IL-17 in mice, provide critical contributions to host immune responses. Development and function of γδ T cells are directed by networks of diverse transcription factors (TFs). Here, we examine the role of the zinc finger TFs, Kruppel-like factor 10 (KLF10), in the regulation of IL-17-committed CD27 γδ T (γδ27−-17) cells. We found selective augmentation of Vγ4+ γδ27− cells with higher IL-17 production in KLF10-deficient mice. Surprisingly, KLF10-deficient CD127hi Vγ4+ γδ27−-17 cells expressed higher levels of CD5 than their wild-type counterparts, with hyper-responsiveness to cytokine, but not T-cell receptor, stimuli. Thymic maturation of Vγ4+ γδ27− cells was enhanced in newborn mice deficient in KLF10. Finally, a mixed bone marrow chimera study indicates that intrinsic KLF10 signaling is requisite to limit Vγ4+ γδ27−-17 cells. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that KLF10 regulates thymic development of Vγ4+ γδ27− cells and their peripheral homeostasis at steady state.


Early studies on Kruppel-like factor 10 (KLF10), a transcription factor (TF) containing zinc finger DNA-binding domains, revealed its role in the induction of and balance between Foxp3+ regulatory T (Treg) cells and IL-17-producing T helper (Th17) cells (13). Stimulation of CD4+ T cells with T-cell receptor (TCR) or TGF-β transiently induces KLF10, which in turn suppresses TCR signaling or enhances TGF-β/Smad signaling, respectively. Therefore, KLF10-deficient CD4+ T cells that are hyper-activated by TCR stimuli are less differentiated into Treg cells than wild-type (WT) controls (1, 2), while Th17 cell differentiation is promoted (3). Nonetheless, the function of KLF10 in vivo is still unclear since the alteration of Treg cells in naïve KLF10-deficient mice is controversial (13) and the enrichment of Th17 cells in these mice has not been clearly reported. Most of all, the functions of KLF10 in other T lymphocytes producing IL-17, such as γδ T cells, are largely unknown.

At steady state, γδ T cells are only a minor subset of T lymphocytes but the major source of IL-17 (46). Innate-like IL-17-committed CD27 γδ T (γδ27−-17) cells are present in peripheral lymph nodes (pLN) as well as regional tissues, including dermis, lung, and peritoneal cavity (5, 7, 8). Most peripheral γδ27−-17 cells stimulated by cytokines, for example, by IL-7 or by IL-1β plus IL-23, can be enriched in the absence of TCR activation (8, 9), and thus respond rapidly to infection or tissue dysregulation. Although TCR signaling is involved in γδ-lineage commitment and functional decision in the thymus (1012), peripheral homeostasis and activity of γδ27−-17 cells is weakly dependent on TCR ligation, which triggers strong activation of γδ27+ cells (8, 1316). γδ27−-17 cells mainly consist of Vγ4+ and Vγ6+ subsets (Tonegawa nomenclature) (17) and phenotypically resemble effector memory cells (CD44hiCD62LloCD127hi) (5, 9), mostly expressing a unique marker, CCR6+NK1.1 (18). It has been suggested that γδ27−-17 cells develop predominantly from early embryonic stage up to shortly after birth (1921). However, whereas maturation of Vγ4+ γδ27−-17 cells occurs in the neonatal thymus (22), Vγ4+ γδ27−-17 cells can be still reconstituted by bone marrow (BM) cells (22, 23).

Thymic development of γδ T cells is regulated by discrete TCR strengths and TCR-independent signaling modalities, which involve exogenous stimuli (TGF-β and IL-7) and/or intrinsic pre-programming of a gene regulatory network of diverse TFs (2426). It is plausible that a weak TCR strength is required for the development of innate-like γδ27−-17 cells and, thus, IL-17-producing capacity is considered to emerge by default from uncommitted early thymocytes (10, 11, 27). However, other reports argue that innate-like γδ-17 cells are dependent on strong TCR signals for their thymic development (13), leaving the role of TCR signaling in the generation of innate-like γδ27−-17 cells unclear. Moreover, TGF-βR or IL-7R signaling, as well as the TF Sox13, promote γδ27−-17 cell development through a TCR-independent signaling pathway (5, 9, 22); in particular, Sox13 selectively regulates Vγ4+ γδ27−-17 cell development (22).

Here, we identify KLF10 as a novel TF that negatively regulates the development and homeostasis of Vγ4+ γδ27−-17 cells. We found selective enlargement of IL-17-committed Vγ4+ γδ27− cells, but not of other IL-17-producing αβ T cells, in KLF10-deficient mice. TCR or cytokine (IL-7 or IL-1β plus IL-23) stimulation on γδ T cells could induce KLF10, which in turn differently regulates γδ T-cell responsiveness to these stimuli. Moreover, KLF10 deficiency affected the expression level of CD5, a stable indicator of TCR strength, on mature Vγ4+ γδ27−-17 cells within the neonatal thymus. These results suggest that the biology of Vγ4+ γδ27−-17 cells is dependent on transcriptional control by KLF10, which is differentially associated with TCR and cytokine signaling.

Materials and Methods


KLF10-deficient mice with C57Bl/6 (B6) background were kindly provided by Dr. Woon Kyu Lee (Inha University, Incheon, South Korea) (28). B6.Rag1-deficient mice and B6.CD45.1 congenic mice were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory. All animals were bred and maintained under specific pathogen-free conditions at the Institute of Laboratory Animal Resource Seoul National University and treated in accordance with institutional guidelines that were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (SNU-140930-4-1).

Cell Preparation

Mouse peripheral lymph nodes (cervical, axillary, brachial, and inguinal), mesenteric lymph node, spleen, thymus, and lung were homogenized by mechanical disaggregation, strained through a 70-µm strainer (BD Biosciences), and washed in RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% (vol/vol) fetal bovine serum (FBS). Peritoneal cells were obtained from peritoneal lavage in cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 5% FBS.

Flow Cytometry

Single-cell suspensions were first blocked with anti-CD16/32 antibody (93; eBioscience) and then stained with antibodies at 4°C for 20 min in staining buffer (1 × PBS containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin and 0.1% sodium azide). For intracellular cytokine staining, the cells were stimulated for 4 h with 50 ng/ml phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA; Sigma-Aldrich) and 750 ng/ml ionomycin (Sigma-Aldrich) in the presence of brefeldin A (BD Biosciences). The cells were then fixed, permeabilized with a BD Cytofix/Cytoperm Kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (BD Biosciences), and stained for IL-17 and IFN-γ. Intracellular phosphorylated protein staining was performed as described (29) with modifications. For assays of intracellular Ca2+ mobilization, cells from WT and knockout (KO) mice were first surface-stained with anti-CD45.2-PerCP-Cy5.5 and anti-CD45.2-Alexa 700, respectively, for subsequent identification of the two strains. Cells from both strains were mixed together at a ratio of 1:1 and loaded for 45 min at 37°C with the membrane-permeable fluorescent Ca2+ indicator dye, Indo-1 AM (Invitrogen), at a concentration of 4 µM in RPMI medium plus 5% (vol/vol) FBS. Cells were then stained for surface markers and were kept on ice. Before stimulation, cell aliquots were allowed to equilibrate to 37°C for 5 min and analyzed by flow cytometry. After acquisition of background intracellular Ca2+ concentrations for 30 s, cells were stimulated with biotinylated anti-CD3ε antibody and crosslinked by the addition of streptavidin. Samples were acquired on Canto II or Aria II (BD Biosciences) and data were analyzed with FlowJo software (TreeStar). Antibodies used for flow cytometric analyses were fluorochrome-labeled mAbs against mouse γδTCR (GL3), CD3ε (145-2C11), CD27 (LG.3A10 or LG.7F9), CD25 (PC61), CD69 (H1.2F3), CD5 (53-7.3), CD24 (M1/69), CD103 (2E7), CD122 (TM-b1), CD132 (TUGm2), CD127 (eBioSB/199), Ly6C (HK1.4), CD28 (E18), CD44 (IM7), CD62L (MEL-14), CCR6 (29-2L17), NK1.1 (PK136), CD45.1 (A20), CD45.2 (104), Vγ1 (2.11), Vγ4 (UC3-10A6), IL-17 (TC11-18H10), IFN-γ (XMG1.2), CD4 (RM4-5), CD8α (53-6.7), TCRβ (H57-597), pErk1/2 (D13.14.4E), pZap70 (n3kobu5), pSTAT3 (D3A7), and pSTAT5 (47/Stat5) (from BD Biosciences, Biolegend, eBioscience, or Cell Signaling Technology).

Cell Sorting and Isolation

After blocking with anti-CD16/32, cells were negatively selected from pooled pLN and splenocytes using anti-TCRβ biotin, anti-CD45R biotin (RA3-6B2), and anti-CD11b (M1/70) antibodies together with MagniSort™ Streptavidin Negative Selection Beads according to the manufacturer’s instructions (eBioscience). The negatively selected cells were then stained with fluorochrome-labeled anti-γδTCR, anti-CD27, and/or anti-Vγ4 antibodies. γδ subsets (Vγ4− γδ27+, Vγ4+ γδ27+, Vγ4− γδ27−, and Vγ4+ γδ27−) were sorted using an Aria II with a purity of at least 98%. Alternatively, total γδ cells were manually isolated by negative selection as described previously (30) with modification. Biotin-conjugated mAbs against the following proteins were used: TCRβ, CD4, CD8α, CD45R, CD11b (M1/70), CD11c, Ly-6G (RB6-8C5), TER-119 (TER-119), and CD49b (DX5) (all from eBioscience).

Cell Culture

Cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 containing 10% (vol/vol) FBS, 50 µM 2-mercaptoethanol, 1% (vol/vol) non-essential amino acids, 10 mM HEPES, and 1% (vol/vol) antibiotics/antimycotic solution (all from Invitrogen). For TCR stimulation, the cells were incubated for the indicated times with plate-bound anti-CD3ε mAb (0.1, 1, or 10 µg/ml; PeproTech) only or in combination with plate-bound anti-CD28 mAb (1 or 10 µg/ml; PeproTech). For cytokine stimulation, IL-7 (20 ng/ml; R&D Systems), TGF-β (10 ng/ml; R&D Systems), IL-6 (20 ng/ml; R&D Systems), IL-1β (10 ng/ml; PeproTech), and IL-23 (20 ng/ml; PeproTech) were added to the medium.

Bone Marrow (BM) Chimeras

Bone marrow cells (5 × 106 cells) from B6.CD45.2 wild-type (WT) or B6.CD45.2 KLF10-deficient mice were intravenously transferred to B6.CD45.1 mice, which were irradiated at 900 cGy. For mixed BM chimeras, B6.CD45.1/2 mice were lethally irradiated at 900 cGy and intravenously administered 5 × 106 B6.CD45.1 WT cells mixed 1:1 with 5 × 106 B6.CD45.2 KLF10-deficient BM cells. Recipient mice were sacrificed and analyzed for reconstituted γδ T cells after at least 12 weeks.

Homeostatic Expansion

Single-cell suspensions of pLN cells obtained from B6.CD45.1 WT and B6.KLF10 knockout (KO) mice were stained with Cell Trace Violet (CVT; Invitrogen) and injected intravenously with 2 × 106 cells into Rag-1-deficient mice. After 5 days, pLNs from the recipient mice were collected and examined for CTV dilution of the transferred T cells.

RNA Extraction and Real-time qPCR

RNA was purified from cells using a Qiagen RNeasy kit. After reverse transcription into cDNA, PCR was performed with a StepOnePlus real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems) and iTaq SYBR Green Supermix (Applied Biosystems) and relative expression was displayed in arbitrary units or as a percent of maximum expression, normalized to Eef1a1 (encoding eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1α1; called “Efa1” hereafter) via the ΔΔCt method. The following primers were used: Efa1 forward, 5′-TCCACCGAGCCACCATACA-3′, reverse, 5′-CCAACCAGAAATTGGCACAA-3′; Klf10 forward, 5′-ACCCAGGGTGTGGCAAGAC-3′, reverse, 5′-AGCGAGCAAACCTCCTTTCA-3′; Rorc forward, 5′-TCAGCGCCCTGTGTTTTTCT-3′, reverse, 5′-CAAATTGTATTGCAGATGTTCCA-3′; Sox13 forward, 5′-CTGCCACCTGGGTTACTTTGA-3′, reverse, 5′-GAGTGGCGTGATGAACATGTG-3′.

Statistical Analyses

Prism software (GraphPad) was used for all statistical analyses. All quantitative data are shown as mean ± standard deviation (SD) unless otherwise indicated. The two-tailed, paired t-test was used for BM chimeras. The two-tailed, unpaired t-test or two-way ANOVA followed by a Bonferroni post hoc test were used for all other data sets. Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) indicates geometric MFI. Robust coefficient of variation (CV) defines 100 × 1/2 [intensity (at 84.13 percentile) − intensity (at 15.87 percentile)/Median] and was determined by FlowJo software. The robust CV is a normalized SD not as skewed by outlying values as the CV.


KLF10 Controls Homeostatic Proliferation of γδ27− Cells

KLF10 has been reported to control Treg and Th17 cell induction (1, 3). Nonetheless, alterations of these cells in KLF10-deficient mice are still controversial (2, 3) and even the general T-cell status of the KO mice is not clearly defined (31). Therefore, we first examined the frequencies and absolute numbers of αβ and γδ T cells in the pLN, spleen, lung, and peritoneal cavity of KO mice under specific pathogen-free conditions. Compared with WT mice, levels of γδ T cells, but not conventional CD4+ and CD8+ αβ T cells, were significantly increased in pLN and lung of KO mice (Figures S1A,B in Supplementary Material). Analysis of discrete LNs (cervical, axillary, brachial, inguinal, and mesenteric; Figure S1C in Supplementary Material) confirmed the higher frequencies of γδ T cells, with the exception of mesenteric LN (mLN). Interestingly, the increase in γδ T cells was largely attributable to γδ27− cell augmentation (Figures 1A,B). As expected, higher numbers of γδ27− cells were observed in all LNs except for mLN (Figure S1D in Supplementary Material), in which innate-like γδ-17 cells are reported to be absent (5).


Figure 1. Kruppel-like factor 10 (KLF10) deficiency promotes peripheral γδ27− cell expansion. (A,B) Overlayed histogram of CD27 expression on γδ T cells [(A), left] and frequency of γδ27− cells [(A), right] and absolute number of γδ27− and γδ27+ cells (B) in pooled peripheral lymph nodes (pLN; cervical, axillary, brachial, and inguinal) from wild-type (WT) and KLF10 knockout (KO) mice (n = 5 per group), as determined by flow cytometry. (C) Frequency of CD44hiCD62L cells among γδ T cells (left) and of CD44hiCD62L γδ T cells among total cells (right) in pLN, spleen (SPL), lung, and peritoneal exudate cells (PEC) from WT and KO mice (n = 5 per group), as determined by flow cytometry. Data are the mean ± SD. (D,E) The ratio of KO to WT γδ27− cells (D), homeostatic expansion of WT versus KO γδ27− cells (E) from pLN cells of Rag-1-deficient mice, which had been co-injected with CTV-labeled CD45.1 WT and CD45.2 KO pLN cells at ratio of 2:1, were gated on CTV+ γδTCR+CD27 cells and then analyzed by flow cytometry after 5 days. Numbers in quadrants of the plot indicate percent of cells in each. Each symbol (A,B) represents an individual mouse; error bars are the mean ± SD. ns, non-significant; *P ≤ 0.05; **P ≤ 0.01; ***P ≤ 0.001. Data are representative of at least three (A–C) or two (E) independent experiments, or are pooled from two independent experiments (D).

CD27 expression discriminated γδ subsets with CD44, CD62L, NK1.1, and CCR6; pLN γδ27− cells were delineated as NK1.1CCR6+CD44hiCD62L effector memory-phenotype cells (11, 32). Consistent with the augmentation of γδ27− cells in KO mice, there were considerably more effector memory-phenotype (CD44hiCD62L) γδ T cells in the analyzed organs (Figure 1C). By contrast, similar frequencies of effector memory-phenotype CD4+ T and CD8+ T cells in these organs were observed from both strains (Figure S2A in Supplementary Material). Intriguingly, the frequencies of Tregs (Figure S2B in Supplementary Material) and Th17 cells (Figure S2C in Supplementary Material, left column) among CD4+ T cells were unchanged in KO mice relative to those in WT mice. In summary, these data suggested that the generation of γδ27− cells was enhanced in KO mice.

To explore the nature of γδ27− cell augmentation in KO mice, we investigated whether KLF10 deficiency affected homeostatic proliferation of γδ27− cells. Considering that the absolute number of KO pLN γδ27− cells was about twice higher than that in WT pLN cells (Figure 1B), we transferred CD45.1 WT and CD45.2 KO pLN cells together into lymphopenic mice at 2:1 ratio; we confirmed that there were the same number of γδ27− cells from both strains (data not shown). The homeostatic expansion of KO γδ27− cells was superior to that of WT γδ27− cells, with a ratio as great as threefold (Figures 1D,E). By contrast, we observed a similar expansion pattern of αβ T cells from both strains in recipient mice transferred with the pLN mixture at 1:1 ratio (Figures S2D–F in Supplementary Material). Therefore, these data suggested that KLF10 specifically inhibited γδ27− cell expansion under lymphopenic conditions.

KLF10 Deficiency Preferentially Expands Vγ4+ γδ27−-17 Cells

To determine phenotypic traits of γδ27− cells expanded in a KLF10-deficient condition (Figures 1A–C), we investigated the expression of surface molecules involved in innate and adaptive immune features of γδ T cells. Interestingly, KO γδ27− cells showed lower expression of CD69, CD28, and CD5, but higher expression of CD103 and CD127, than their WT counterparts (Figure 2A). To understand these changes in the light of Vγ chains, we examined the Vγ usage and found a Vγ4-biased composition of KO γδ27− cells (Figure 2B, left). Indeed, Vγ4+ γδ27− cells expressed lower CD5 and CD28 but higher CD127 and CD103 than Vγ4 γδ27− cells (data not shown), which demonstrated that the change in these surface molecules on γδ27− cells (Figure 2A) could be attributed to the preferential distribution of a Vγ4 subset. In addition, only Vγ4+ γδ27− cells were considerably enhanced in pLN, whereas the abundance of Vγ1+ γδ27− and Vγ1Vγ4 γδ27− cells was unchanged in KO mice compared with that in WT mice (Figure 2B, right). Collectively, our results indicated that Vγ4+ γδ27− cells were selectively enriched under KLF10 deficiency.


Figure 2. KLF10 deficiency selectively expands innate-like IL-17-committed Vγ4+ γδ27− cells. (A) Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of each molecule expressed on γδ27− (blue) and γδ27+ (red) cells in peripheral lymph nodes (pLN) from wild-type (WT) and knockout (KO) mice (n = 5 per group). (B) Frequency (left) and absolute number (right) of Vγ1+, Vγ4+, and Vγ1Vγ4 cells among γδ27− and γδ27+ cells obtained as in (A). (C) Intracellular IL-17 or IFN-γ expression in pooled pLN cells from WT and KO mice (n = 3 per group) after stimulation with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) plus ionomycin, gated on γδ27+ or γδ27− cells. Number adjacent to the gating indicates the percent of each population. (D) Frequency of IL-17+ or IFN-γ+ cells among γδ27+ and γδ27− cells (left) and their absolute number (right) in WT and KO mice determined as in (C). (E) Frequency of IL-17+ cells among CCR6+ (top, left) or Vγ4+ (top, right) γδ T cells and their absolute number (bottom) in pooled pLN cells from WT (n = 6) and KO mice (n = 8) after stimulation with PMA plus ionomycin. (F) IL-17 MFI of IL-17+Vγ4+CCR6+ γδ T cells determined as in (E). (G) Real-time reverse transcription PCR analysis of Rorc expression in sorted Vγ4+ γδ27+, Vγ4 γδ27+, Vγ4+ γδ27−, and Vγ4 γδ27− cells from pooled pLN and spleen of WT and KO mice (n = 10 per group), normalized to the housekeeping gene Efa1. Expression level of Rorc in WT Vγ4+ γδ27+ cells was set to 1. Data in (B,D,G) are mean ± SD. Each symbol (A,E,F) represents an individual mouse; error bars are the mean ± SD. *P ≤ 0.05; **P ≤ 0.01; ***P ≤ 0.001. Data are representative of at least three independent experiments (A–F) or two independent experiments (G).

As γδ27− cells are innate-like IL-17-producing γδ T cells (γδ-17) (6), we examined intracellular levels of IL-17A. Consistent with the greater abundance of Vγ4+ γδ27− (Figure 2B) and Vγ4+CCR6+ cells (data not shown) in pLN of KO mice, considerably more IL-17+ cells were observed in γδ27− cells from KO pLN cells after stimulation with PMA plus ionomycin (Figures 2C,D). This was further confirmed by the increased number of IL-17+CCR6+ or IL-17+Vγ4+ γδ T cells (Figure 2E). Of note, IL-17 production by IL-17+Vγ4+CCR6+ γδ T cells was higher in the KLF10-deficient condition than in the normal condition, as measured by the MFI of intracellular IL-17 (Figure 2F), indicating that KLF10 constrained IL-17 production by Vγ4+ γδ27− cells. Finally, KO Vγ4+ γδ27− cells contained considerably higher levels of Rorc than their WT counterparts (Figure 2G). These results collectively suggested that KLF10 impaired the size of the innate-like Vγ4+ γδ27−-17 population together with their IL-17-producing capacity.

KLF10 Differently Regulates γδ27− Cell Responsiveness to Cytokine and TCR Stimuli

Peripheral homeostasis and IL-17 production of innate-like γδ-17 cells are mainly controlled by innate signaling triggered by cytokines, such as IL-7 and IL-1β plus IL-23 (8, 9). Thus, we determined whether KLF10 was involved in cytokine-signaling on Vγ4+ γδ27− cells. Under IL-7 treatment the absolute number of Vγ4+ and Vγ1Vγ4 γδ27− cells from KO mice was considerably increased compared with their WT counterparts (Figure 3A). Both γδ27− subsets of KO mice exhibited greater proliferation (Figure 3B) and there were higher frequencies of IL-17+ expanding cells among KO γδ27− subsets (Figure 3C). Because IL-7 enriches γδ27−-17 cells by activating STAT3 rather than STAT5 (9), we assessed STAT phosphorylation triggered by IL-7. IL-7 substantially activated STAT5 in both Vγ4+ and Vγ4 γδ27− cells from WT mice, whereas the phosphorylation of STAT3 was slightly induced by IL-7 (Figure 3D), consistent with the previous report showing the capacity of IL-7 to activate STAT3 in γδ27− cells (9). Of note, compared to the normal condition, the KLF10 deficiency increased the level of phospho-STAT3 (pSTAT3), but not of pSTAT5, under IL-7 treatment (Figure 3D). Meanwhile, we observed the pSTAT3 induction in Vγ4 γδ27− cells when treated with IL-6, but not in Vγ4+ γδ27− cells (Figure S3A in Supplementary Material). These data suggested that STAT3 activation might be involved in the hyper-responsiveness of KO γδ27− cells to IL-7. On the other hand, contrary to the aforementioned in vivo Vγ4+ γδ27−-17 cell-specific regulation of KLF10 (Figure 2), in vitro hyper-responsiveness to IL-7 was observed in KO γδ27− cells regardless of Vγ4 (Figures 3A–C). In addition, KLF10 deficiency promoted γδ27− cells, irrespective of Vγ4, providing an advantage for homeostatic expansion in lymphopenic conditions (Figure 3E). Collectively, these results suggest a critical role for KLF10 in IL-7 signaling-mediated homeostasis of innate-like γδ27−-17 cells.


Figure 3. KLF10 inhibits γδ27− cell responsiveness to cytokine but not TCR stimuli. (A) The change in numbers of Vγ1+, Vγ4+, and Vγ1Vγ4 of γδ27+ or γδ27− cells from wild-type (WT) or knockout (KO) peripheral lymph node (pLN) cells (n = 3 per group) cultured with IL-7 (20 ng/ml) for 5 days, as determined by flow cytometry. The cell number at start was 5 × 106. (B,C) Half-offset histogram of proliferation (B) and intracellular IL-17 expression [(C); after stimulation with PMA plus ionomycin] in γδ T cells sorted from pooled pLN and spleen of WT and KO mouse (n = 10 per group), CTV-labeled and cultured with IL-7 (20 ng/ml) for 5 days. (D) Overlayed histogram of phosphorylated STAT3 or STAT5 in Vγ4+ γδ27− or Vγ4 γδ27− cells from pooled WT or KO pLN cells (n ≥ 3 per group) cultured with IL-7 (20 ng/ml) for 30 min and assessed by flow cytometry. Numbers indicate mean fluorescence intensity variation between cells cultured with or without IL-7. Con, control; FMO, fluorescence minus one. (E) Percent of dividing cells among Vγ4+ γδ27− or Vγ4 γδ27− cells from CD45.2 KO pLN cells, injected into Rag-1-deficient mouse and then analyzed by flow cytometry after 5 days as in Figure 1D, gated on CD45.2+CD27CTV+ γδTCR+ cells. (F) Real-time reverse transcription PCR analysis of Klf10 and Rorc expression (normalized to the housekeeping gene Efa1) in sorted γδ27− cells from pooled pLN and spleen of WT mice (n ≥ 10), cultured with or without IL-7 (20 ng/ml), IL-1β (10 ng/ml) plus IL-23 (20 ng/ml), or TGF-β (10 ng/ml) plus IL-6 (20 ng/ml) for 17 h. Expression levels of Klf10 and Rorc in control (Con) were set to 1. (G) Half-offset histogram of proliferation of γδ T cells sorted as in (B), CTV-labeled and cultured on plated-bound anti-CD3ε (0.1 µg/ml) and anti-CD28 (10 µg/ml) for 3 days. (H) Real-time reverse transcription PCR analysis of Klf10 and Rorc expression (normalized to the housekeeping gene Efa1) in γδ T cells sorted as in (F), cultured on plated-bound anti-CD3ε (αCD3ε; 0, 0.1, 1, and 10 µg/ml) for 3 h. Expression levels of Klf10 and Rorc in cells without anti-CD3ε mAb were set to 1. (I) Intracellular Ca2+ mobilization in pLN cells obtained from WT and KO mice (n = 4), stained for surface markers to identify the indicated γδ subsets, stimulated via the TCR with biotinylated anti-CD3ε (20 µg/ml) followed by crosslinkage of the TCR with streptavidin (40 µg/ml) and then assayed over 5 min. Numbers in (B,C,G) indicate the percent of dividing cells (B,G) or of the gated population among IL-17 positive or negative cells in each panel (C). Data in (A,F,H) are mean ± SD. Each symbol (E) represents an individual mouse; error bars are the mean ± SD ns, non-significant; *P ≤ 0.05; **P ≤ 0.01; ***P ≤ 0.001. Data are representative of at least three independent experiments (A–C,E,I) or two independent experiments (D,F,H).

We next examined whether KLF10 is also involved in the reactivity of γδ27− cells to inflammatory conditions such as IL-1β plus IL-23 that are known to induce IL-17 production by γδ T cells (8). Consistent with the results of IL-7 stimulation, γδ27− cells from KO mice were hyper-responsive to IL-1β plus IL-23 (Figures S3B,C in Supplementary Material), which indicated that KLF10 also inhibited the activation of γδ27− cells triggered by inflammatory stimuli. Of note, Klf10 expression was increased in γδ27− cells stimulated with IL-1β plus IL-23, as well as those stimulated with IL-7 (Figure 3F). On the other hand, KLF10 deficiency did not lead to an alteration in the calcium fluxes directly triggered by stimulation with PMA plus ionomycin, ruling out the possibility that the hyper-responsiveness of KO γδ27− cells might be qualitatively unspecific to cytokines (Figure S3D in Supplementary Material). Together, these data suggested that homeostatic and inflammatory cytokine signaling could induce KLF10, which in turn, as a negative feedback signaling factor, might impair γδ27− cell responsiveness to these innate stimuli.

Next, we sought to determine whether KLF10 might be involved in TCR-triggered activation of peripheral γδ T cells (13, 32). γδ27+ cells could readily expand under TCR/CD28 stimuli, whereas γδ27− cells showed different patterns of proliferation and, especially, Vγ4+ γδ27− cells hardly expanded (Figure 3G), supporting a preceding report that innate-like γδ27− cells display hypo-responsive TCR signaling (13). Although Klf10 could be significantly induced by TCR activation in total γδ T cells, in which γδ27+ cells accounted for up to 85% of the cells (Figure 3H), there were similar expansions of each γδ subset between WT and KO mice (Figure 3G). As previously reported (13), a rapid and transient increase in cytosolic calcium concentration triggered by TCR engagement was readily detected in γδ27+ cells, but not in γδ27− cells; however, there were no differences in calcium fluxes between the strains (Figure 3I). Most of all, a Vγ4+ γδ27− subset almost completely failed to phosphorylate ERK after TCR stimulation (Figure S3E in Supplementary Material). Therefore, KLF10 has a minor role in TCR-triggered activation of peripheral γδ subsets. To further investigate whether the level of engagement by the antigen or costimulatory receptor influenced KLF10 involvement in the TCR response, we treated the cells with different doses of agonist antibodies. Vγ4+ γδ27− cells from both strains responded similarly to a high level of antigen engagement even in the absence of costimulatory signaling, but still showed an impaired proliferative response compared to that of γδ27+ cells (Figure S3F in Supplementary Material); similar results were found with costimulatory stimuli. Therefore, neither the strong antigen receptor nor costimulatory signaling caused a substantial discrepancy in TCR response of peripheral γδ subsets between the two strains.

CD5loCD127hi γδ27− Subsets As Innate-Like γδ-17 Cells

The expression level of CD5, a stable indicator of TCR strength, was lower in γδ27− cells than in γδ27+ cells (Figure 2A), indicating that γδ27− cells might receive a relatively weak TCR strength compared with γδ27+ cells; this is in line with the fact that a weak TCR-signal strength is required for thymic development of innate-like γδ-17 cells (11, 33). Intriguingly, when we monitored CD5 expression (Figure 4A), γδ27− cells contained two different populations (CD5high and CD5low), meaning that they are a heterogeneous group receiving discrete TCR-signal strengths. Such a two-peak pattern was also observed for CD127 (IL-7 receptor-α, IL-7Rα), one of the markers identifying innate-like γδ-17 cells (Figure 4A) (9, 13), allowing us to distinguish CD5loCD127hi and CD5hiCD127lo cells (Figure 4B) and further presume that CD5loCD127hi γδ27− cells might represent the innate-like γδ-17 cells. Indeed, the CD5loCD127hi γδ27− subset was greater in KO mice, whereas the CD5hiCD127lo γδ27− subset was present in normal numbers (Figure 4C).


Figure 4. CD5loCD127hi γδ27− cells are IL-17-competent γδ T cells. (A) Overlayed histogram of CD5 and CD127 expression on γδ27+ versus γδ27− cells in peripheral lymph node (pLN) cells pooled from wild-type (WT) mice (n ≥ 4), as determined by flow cytometry. ISO, isotype control. (B) Pseudocolor plot of CD5 versus CD127 expression in pLN γδ27− cells from WT and knockout (KO) mice (n ≥ 4 per group). (C) Percent of CD5loCD127hi and CD5hiCD127lo cells [gated as in (B)] among γδ27− cells (left) and their absolute numbers (right) in pLN cells from WT and KO mice (n ≥ 4 per group). (D,E) MFI of surface CD28, CD25, CD132, CD103, and Ly6C expression (D) and Vγ distribution (E) on CD5loCD127hi γδ27−, CD5hiCD127lo γδ27− [gated as in (B)] and γδ27+ cells obtained as in (A) (n = 4). (F,G) Pseudocolor plot of CD5 and CD127 on γδ27− cells (F) and density plot of CD5 and CD127 [(G), left] or Vγ1 and Vγ4 [(G), right] on CD24hi or CD24lo γδ27− cells in pLN cells from 2-week-old (young) and 8-week-old (adult) WT mice (n ≥ 4 per each). (H) Overlayed histogram of CD5 and CD127 on IL-17+ or IL-17 γδ27− cells obtained as in (A) (n = 3), after stimulation with PMA plus ionomycin. Numbers in outlined areas or quadrants of plots indicate percent of cells in each. Data in (C) are mean ± SD. Each symbol (D) represents an individual mouse; error bars are the mean ± SD. *P ≤ 0.05; ***P ≤ 0.001. Data are representative of at least three independent experiments.

Interestingly, CD5hiCD127lo γδ27− cells closely resembled γδ27+ cells rather than CD5loCD127hi γδ27− cells in terms of surface protein expression (Figure 4D) and Vγ usage (Figure 4E). We noted that the frequency of CD5hiCD127lo cells among γδ27− cells was very low (3.4%) in young mice (2 weeks old) but greatly increased (45.5%) in the adult (8 weeks old) (Figure 4F). These cells mainly appeared within mature (CD24lo) γδ27− cells of the thymus (Figure S4 in Supplementary Material) and pLN (Figure 4G), and were accompanied by higher levels of Vγ1+ cells. In addition, CD5hiVγ1+ cells emerged among immature (CD24hi) γδ27− cells of the adult thymus (Figure S4 in Supplementary Material), in accordance with the previous report on sequential Vγ waves with age (34) and possibly indicating that CD5hiCD127lo γδ27− cells might be generated in the adult rather than the fetal/neonatal thymus.

In contrast to CD5hiCD127lo γδ27− and γδ27+ cells, CD5loCD127hi γδ27− cells had common γ chain receptor signal-dependent and epithelial-homing phenotypes with Vγ4+ subset dominance (Figures 4D,E). In particular, IL-17+ γδ27− cells were CD5loCD127hi (Figure 4H), which ultimately validated CD5loCD127hi γδ27− cells as “virtually” innate-like γδ-17 cells.

CD5intVγ4+CD127hi γδ27−-17 Cell Development in KLF10-Deficient Mice

By scrutinizing the expression patterns of CD5 and CD127 on γδ27− cells, depicted in a pseudocolor plot (Figure 4B), we could recognize another peak of CD5 that was relatively high in CD5loCD127hi γδ27− cells under KLF10 deficiency, but otherwise was barely detectable under normal conditions. Thus, we further distinguished CD5int cells from CD5loCD127hi γδ27− cells (Figure 5A) and found that the CD5intCD127hi subgroup was expanded in a KLF10-deficient condition (Figure 5B). This enriched sub-group skewed toward a Vγ4 chain (Figure 5C), consistent with the selective enrichment of a Vγ4+ γδ27− subset in KO mice (Figure 2B). Indeed, IL-17 production was observed in both CD5lo and CD5int CD127hi γδ27− cells, and the latter population (IL-17+CD5intCD127lo) was genuinely augmented by KLF10 deletion (Figure 5D). Taken together, these findings indicated that KLF10 deficiency selectively expanded innate-like IL-17-competent CD5intVγ4+CD127hi γδ27− cells.


Figure 5. Vγ4+ γδ27− cells developmentally express relatively higher CD5 under KLF10-deficient condition. (A) Density plot of CD5 and CD127 on peripheral lymph node (pLN) γδ27− cells from wild-type (WT) mice (n ≥ 4). (B–D) Percent of CD5loCD127hi, CD5intCD127hi and CD5hiCD127lo [gated as in (A)] among γδ27− cells [(B), top], their absolute numbers [(B), bottom] and Vγ distribution (C), and frequency of IL-17+ cells among the each gated group [(D), top; after stimulation with phorbol myristate acetate plus ionomycin] and their absolute numbers [(D), bottom] in pLN cells from WT and knockout (KO) mice (n ≥ 5 per group). (E) Density plot of CD5 and Vγ4 on CD127hi γδ27− cells (left) and percent of Vγ4+CD5int cells among them (right) in pLN cells from WT and KO mice (n = 4). (F,G) Half-offset histogram of CD5 and CD127 (F) and their mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) (G) on CD24hi or CD24lo Vγ4+ γδ27− cells in thymocytes from neonatal (day 4 after birth) WT and KO mice (n = 5 per group). (H) Density plot of phosphorylated ERK in CD24hi or CD24lo cells of Vγ4+ γδ27− and γδ27+ cells from neonatal thymocytes obtained as in (F), stimulated with soluble anti-CD3ε (1 µg/ml) for 3 min. Con, control. Numbers adjacent outlined areas of plots (E,H) indicate percent of cells in each. Data in (B–D) are mean ± SD. Each symbol (E,G) represents an individual mouse; error bars are the mean ± SD ns, non-significant; *P ≤ 0.05; **P ≤ 0.01; ***P ≤ 0.001. Data are representative of at least three independent experiments (A–E) or two independent experiments (F–H).

In normal conditions, CD5lo and CD5int CD127hi γδ27− subgroups exhibited preferential distribution of Vγ4+ and Vγ1Vγ4 subsets, respectively (Figure 5C), raising the possibility that KLF10-deficient Vγ4+ γδ27− cells might express higher amounts of surface CD5 than their WT counterparts. Indeed, we observed elevated CD5 expression on Vγ4+ γδ27− cells of pLN from KO mice (Figure 5E; Figure S5 in Supplementary Material). It is noting that the considerable increase of CD5 was detected only in Vγ4+ γδ27− cells, but not in other immune cells, including naive (CD44loCD62Lhi), effector (CD44loCD62Llo), and memory (CD44hiCD62Lhi as central, CD44hiCD62Llo as effector) phenotypes of CD4+ or CD8+ T cells (data not shown). Because CD5 is positively associated with the strength of TCR signaling that T cells received during their selection within the thymus (35), we next assessed the expression level of CD5 on thymic γδ T cells in neonates in which Vγ4+ γδ27−-17 cell maturation actively occurred (22). Interestingly, we observed considerably higher surface CD5 expression on mature (CD24loCD44hi) thymic Vγ4+ γδ27− cells under conditions of KLF10 deficiency, whereas the difference in CD5 was equivocal on the immature (CD24hiCD44lo) cells (Figures 5F,G). However, consistent with the peripheral observation (Figure S3E in Supplementary Material), TCR-triggered phosphorylation of ERK in neonatal thymic Vγ4+ γδ27− cells was quite similar between both strains regardless of their maturation; ERK was hardly activated by TCR stimulation in Vγ4+ γδ27− cells, contrary to the significant activation of ERK in γδ27+ cells (Figure 5H). These data collectively suggested that KLF10 deficiency resulted into CD5intVγ4+CD127hi γδ27− cell development by controlling thymic maturation of Vγ4+ γδ27− cells in neonates.

Enhanced Thymic Maturation of Vγ4+ γδ27−-17 Cells in KLF10-Deficient Neonates

Next, we determined whether the selective expansion of CD5intVγ4+ γδ27−-17 cells under KLF10 deficiency was developmental. As expected, Vγ4+ γδ27− cell maturation was enhanced in the neonatal thymus of KO mice, as measured by the frequency of mature (CD24loCD44hi) cells among Vγ4+ γδ27− cells and their absolute number (Figures 6A,C). Intriguingly, frequencies of IL-17+ cells were higher in both Vγ1Vγ4 and Vγ4+ γδ27− cells of KO neonatal thymus (Figure 6B) and this abundance was even observed at the immature (CD24hiCD44lo) stage (Figure 6D), indicating a general involvement of KLF10 in the IL-17-producing capacity of γδ27− cells before thymic maturation. However, only Vγ4+ γδ27−-17 cells were significantly more abundant in the KO neonatal thymus at both immature and mature stages (Figure 6E), confirming the preferential restraint of KLF10 on Vγ4+ γδ27−-17 cell development.


Figure 6. KLF10 deficiency leads to enhanced thymic maturation of Vγ4+ γδ27−-17 cells in neonates. (A,B) Density plot and percent of CD24loCD44hi cells (A) or IL-17+ cells [(B); after stimulation with PMA plus ionomycin] among Vγ1Vγ4 or Vγ4+ γδ27− cells in thymocytes from neonatal (day 4 after birth) wild-type (WT) and knockout (KO) mice (n ≥ 4 per group). (C) Absolute numbers of CD24hiCD44lo and CD24loCD44hi cells in Vγ1Vγ4 or Vγ4+ γδ27− cells obtained as in (A). (D,E) Percent of IL-17+ cells among CD44lo or CD44hi cells of Vγ1Vγ4 or Vγ4+ γδ27− cells (D) and their absolute numbers (E) obtained as in (B). Numbers adjacent outlined areas of plots indicate percent of cells in each. Each symbol represents an individual mouse; error bars are the mean ± SD ns, non-significant; *P ≤ 0.05; **P ≤ 0.01; ***P ≤ 0.001. In (C–E), two-way ANOVA followed by a Bonferroni posttest was used to determine significance. Data are representative of three independent experiments.

TCR-Dependent and -Independent Signaling Orchestrate KLF10 Execution Unique to Vγ4+ γδ27− Thymic Development

Consistent with the difference in CD5 expression on γδ subsets in the periphery (Figures 5C and 7A; Figure S5 in Supplementary Material), CD5 expression on each γδ thymic subset was unique and distinct based on the expression of Vγ chains and CD27 (Figure 7B). These results might suggest that different strength of TCR signal is required for thymic development of γδ subsets (11, 26). Regardless of CD27, the intensity of CD5 expression on immature Vγ4+ subsets was at a low level and distinct from that of immature Vγ1+ or Vγ1Vγ4 subsets, suggesting a requirement for weaker TCR signaling for thymic emergence of Vγ4+ cells (Figure 7B). We noted that immature Vγ4+ γδ27− thymocytes expressed the lowest level of CD5, which was similarly maintained in the periphery (Figure 7A).


Figure 7. The uniqueness of Vγ4+ γδ27− thymic development. (A) Half-offset histogram of CD5 and CD127 on Vγ1+, Vγ4+, and Vγ1Vγ4 subsets of γδ27+ or γδ27− cells in peripheral lymph node cells from adult (6-week-old) WT mice. (B–D) MFI of CD5 and CD127 [(B); n = 10], robust coefficient of variation (CV) of CD5 MFI [(C); n = 5], and MFI of phosphorylated Zap70 [(D); n = 4] on CD24hi or CD24lo cells of each subset [indicated as in (A)] from neonatal (day 3 after birth) thymocytes of WT mice. (E–G) MFI of CD5 on TCRβintCD69+, TCRβhiCD69+ and TCRβhiCD69 cells of CD4+CD8+ double-positive (DP) cells (E), density plot of CD4 and CD8 expression on TCRβintCD69+, TCRβhiCD69+ and TCRβhiCD69 cells (F), and percent of CD24loQa-2hiCD62L+CD69 cells among CD4+ or CD8+ TCRβhi cells (G) in thymocytes from WT and KO mice (n ≥ 4). Data (E,G) are mean ± SD. Each symbol (B–D) represents an individual mouse; error bars are the mean ± SD. *P ≤ 0.05; **P ≤ 0.01; ***P ≤ 0.001. Data are representative of at least three independent experiments.

We observed that thymic maturation induced a general decrease in CD5 expression on γδ T cells (Figure 7B). However, the CV of CD5 dramatically decreased in only Vγ4+ thymocytes after maturation (Figure 7C), suggesting their restricted spectrum of TCR-signal mode. To determine the basal activity of TCR signaling, we directly assessed intracellular levels of pZap70 in each γδ subset (Figure 7D). Interestingly, in contrast to the Vγ chain-specific clustering of CD5 MFI (Figure 7B), the level of pZap70 in immature γδ subsets clustered according to the expression of CD27 (Figure 7D), suggesting that each immature Vγ subset possessed basal TCR signaling that was influenced by CD27 costimulation (14, 32). Nonetheless, the level of pZap70 in immature Vγ4+ γδ27− thymocytes was low, similar to that in immature Vγ1Vγ4 γδ27− thymocytes, and then slightly decreased in the Vγ4+ γδ27− subset and increased in the Vγ1Vγ4 γδ27− subset after maturation; thus, a Vγ4+ γδ27− subset could acquire a relatively lower activity of basal TCR signaling (Figure 7D). Together, these data emphasized a TCR-signaling modality unique to the emergence and maturational transition of a Vγ4+ γδ27− subset, endorsing a weak TCR-signaling requirement for innate-like γδ-17 differentiation (10, 36). It is important to note that Klf10 could be induced by both TCR-dependent and -independent signaling pathways (Figures 3F,H), which were differently engaged in γδ development (24). On the other hand, CD127 (IL-7Rα) was abruptly induced in Vγ4+ or Vγ1Vγ4 γδ27− subsets after thymic maturation (Figure 7B), consistent with the notion of mature stage-specific acquisition of cytokine receptor-mediated regulation of γδ effector differentiation (25). Therefore, a series of weak TCR-signaling engagements with subsequent initiation of cytokine signaling seemingly cooperate for the function of KLF10 specific to Vγ4+ γδ27− thymic development by primarily fine-tuning KLF10 transcription.

Transcriptional profiling of thymic Vγ subsets revealed that immature Vγ4+ subsets are distinct from other immature Vγ subsets (Vγ1+, Vγ1.1+Vδ6.3+, and Vγ5+) but, interestingly, closely similar to CD4+CD8+ double-positive (DP) CD69+ cells of the αβ lineage, based on low expression of genes involved in metabolism and energy production (25). Of note, a gene constellation browser publicly provided by the Immunological Genome Project (ImmGen; reported that Klf10 in γδ T cells was closely correlated with genes encoding metabolic molecules, which showed lower expression in the immature Vγ4+ subset than in other Vγ subsets (data not shown) (25, 37). When we assessed the expression of CD5 on DP cells, KO DP cells transiently displayed relatively higher CD5 expression than their WT counterparts at post-positive selection, but not at the fully matured (TCRβhiCD69) stage (Figure 7E), accompanied by a delayed CD4 lineage choice (Figure 7F). However, maturation of CD4 and CD8 T cells was normal in both strains, as measured by the percentage of CD24loQa-2hiCD62L+CD69 cells among TCRβhi CD4+ or CD8+ cells (Figure 7G). Thus, these data suggested that the putative mechanism involved in mature stage-specific alteration of surface CD5 on the Vγ4+ γδ27− thymic subset by KLF10 deficiency (Figures 5F,G) might be related to a metabolic process that is common to both Vγ4+ subsets and DP CD69+ cells.

KLF10 Intrinsically Regulates the Development of Vγ4+ γδ27−-17 Cells

Finally, we examined whether KLF10 extrinsically or intrinsically controlled homeostasis of Vγ4+ γδ27−-17 cells. We reconstituted irradiated CD45.2+ WT or KO mice with congenic WT BM cells and analyzed CD45.1+ γδ27− cells after at least 12 wks (Figure S6B in Supplementary Material). Reconstitution of Vγ4+ γδ27− cells and CD5loCD127hi γδ27− cells in KO recipients was achieved at a level comparable to that in WT recipients, excluding the hematopoietic system-extrinsic effect of KLF10 on the homeostasis of Vγ4+ γδ27− 17 cells (Figure 8A). By contrast, mixed BM chimera experiments in which a 1:1 mixture of CD45.1+ WT and CD45.2+ KO BM cells was injected into lethally irradiated CD45.1/2+ WT mice (Figure S8C in Supplementary Material) showed a higher proportion of KO BM-derived cells among total CD3ε+ cells (data not shown). This suggested that KLF10-deficient BM cells outcompeted their WT counterparts during reconstitution of hematopoietic-derived cells, with the fact that KLF10 transcripts are at high level in long- and short-term repopulating hematopoietic stem cells (


Figure 8. KLF10 restraint of innate-like Vγ4+ γδ27−-17 cells is cell-intrinsic. (A) Dot plot and percent of Vγ4+Vγ1 cells (top) and CD5loCD127hi cells (bottom) among peripheral lymph node (pLN) γδ27− cells of CD45.2 WT or KO mice (n = 4), irradiated and reconstituted with CD45.1 WT bone marrow (BM) cells and then assessed by flow cytometry at least 12 weeks later, gated on CD45.1+ γδ27− cells. (B,C) CD45.1/2 WT mice (n ≥ 3) were irradiated and reconstituted with a mixture of CD45.1 WT BM plus CD45.2 KO BM cells at ratio 1:1 and then pLN cells were analyzed by flow cytometry at least 12 weeks later. (B) Percent of Vγ4+ γδ27− cells (left) or γδ27− cells (right) among WT and KO total γδ T cells or, γδ27− cells (middle) among WT and KO Vγ4+ cells. (C) Dot plot (left) and percent (right) of Vγ4+ (top) or CD5loCD127hi cells (middle) among WT and KO γδ27− cells, or IL-17+ cells (bottom) among WT and KO Vγ4+ γδ27− cells. (D) Real-time reverse transcription PCR analysis of Klf10 expression in sorted Vγ4+ γδ27+, Vγ4 γδ27+, Vγ4+ γδ27−, and Vγ4 γδ27− cells from pooled pLN and spleen of WT mice (n = 10 per group), normalized to the housekeeping gene Efa1 and presented as the percent of maximum expression of Klf10. Data (A,D) are mean ± SD. Each symbol represents an individual recipient mouse. A line connects WT-derived cells to KO-derived cells that developed within the same recipient mouse. ns, non-significant; **P ≤ 0.01; ***P ≤ 0.001. Data are representative of two independent experiments (A,D) or are pooled from two independent experiments (B,C).

We next investigate whether γδ cell-intrinsic KLF10 role is responsible for the restraint of Vγ4+ γδ27− cells. In the mixed BM chimera setting, a proportion of Vγ4+ γδ27− cells in KO BM-derived γδ T cells was relatively higher than that of their WT counterpart (Figure 8B). Although the total γδ T cells from both WT and KO BM cells contained γδ27− cells similarly, the KO BM-derived Vγ4+ cells generated γδ27− cells more than their WT counterpart did (Figure 8B); as expected, there were comparable proportions of γδ27− cells in Vγ4 cells and of Vγ4+ cells in γδ27+ cells between the both origins (Figure S8D in Supplementary Material). Indeed, KO BM-derived γδ27− cells contained higher proportions of Vγ4+ cells and CD5loCD127hi cells than their WT BM-derived counterparts (Figure 8C). Of note, KO BM-derived Vγ4+ γδ27− cells had greater frequencies of IL-17+ cells (Figure 8C). We also found a higher level of Klf10 expression in Vγ4+ γδ27− cells compared to the other γδ subsets (Figure 8D), possibly supporting the preferential engagement of KLF10 for the homeostasis of Vγ4+ γδ27− cells. Collectively, these results suggest that KLF10 serves as an intrinsic negative regulator to constrain Vγ4+ γδ27−-17 cells and their production of IL-17.


Early studies revealed that KLF10-deficient mice had defective Treg cell generation under inflammatory conditions, emphasizing the role of KLF10 as a TF in the balance between Treg and Th17 cell differentiation (13). Although KLF10, previously named TIEG-1 (TGF-β-induced early gene-1), can be rapidly induced in CD4 T cells after TGF-β stimulation and then functions to maintain the activation of TGF-β/Smad signaling pathway (2), we found that KLF10 transcription did not respond to TGF-β in γδ27− cells (data not shown), indicating that KLF10 function in γδ-17 cells was irrelevant to TGF-β/Smad signaling for γδ-17 cell development (5). Intriguingly, by analyzing these KO mice under steady-state conditions (unimmunized and specific pathogen-free), we have identified KLF10 as a critical negative regulator of development and homeostasis of Vγ4+ γδ27− cells. KLF10-deficient mice exhibited a spontaneous and selective augmentation of Vγ4+ γδ-17 cells with normal frequencies of IL-17-producing TCRβ+ cells such as Th17, Tc-17 (IL-17+CD8+TCRβ+) and iNKT-17 (IL-17+CD1d-tet+TCRβ+) cells, as well as Treg cells, suggesting a novel function of KLF10 unique to innate-like γδ-17 cells. Meanwhile, the slight increase of IFN-γ+ γδ27+ cells in pLN of KO mice might demand further investigation.

Robust expansion of innate-like γδ-17 cells under lymphopenic conditions is completely dependent on homeostatic cytokine IL-7 but not MHC recognition (15, 16). However, because of cellular competition for trophic cytokines or space (15), γδ T cell homeostatic expansion was inhibited by αβ T cells after transfer of pLN cells into lymphopenic mice. Interestingly, we found that KLF10 deficiency allowed γδ27− cells to overcome the competitive inhibition by αβ T cells, reflecting the increased sensitivity of IL-7 signaling in KO γδ27− cells. This was confirmed by the hyper-responsiveness of KO γδ27− cells to exogenous IL-7 stimulation with increased STAT3 activation. KO γδ27− cells also hyper-responded to IL-1β plus IL-23 stimuli. Of note, KLF10 transcription in γδ27− cells was dramatically induced by IL-6 (data not shown), IL-7, or IL-1β plus IL-23, which are known to trigger STAT3 activation to induce RoRγt expression (9, 38, 39), suggesting that KLF10 was a negative regulator of a STAT3-RoRγt axis in γδ-17 cells. Clearly, further studies are needed to determine the target genes, interacting signal proteins, and post-translational modifications of KLF10 to discern how KLF10 contributes to cytokine-signaling pathways in γδ-17 cells. On the other hand, KLF10 was closely correlated with cell division control protein 42 homolog and Fas apoptotic inhibitory molecule in γδ T cells according to a gene constellation view by ImmGen (data not shown) (37), suggesting a direct link between KLF10 and prosurvival proteins such as Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL, which are upregulated by IL-7 in γδ-17 cells (16). Therefore, it is necessary to explore whether KLF10 directly engages in entry into the cell cycle and the intrinsic cell death pathway of γδ-17 cells (16, 40).

The increased IL-7 signaling sensitivity of KO γδ27− cells was independent of Vγ4 under conditions of strong reliance on IL-7 (lymphopenic condition or direct treatment with IL-7), which is different from the Vγ4+ subset-specific γδ27− cell enrichment observed in KO mice. IL-7Rα expression was not only similar between Vγ4+ and Vγ1Vγ4 γδ27− subsets, both of which are main producers of innate IL-17 among γδ T cells, but was also unchanged by KLF10 deficiency (data not shown). These data suggest that Vγ4 γδ27− cells, presumably Vγ1Vγ4 γδ27− subsets, are under homeostatic control by certain factors counteracting the effect of an active IL-7R-KLF10 signal axis (15). These factors could be directly or indirectly involved in the downstream of IL-7R signaling. Alternatively, considering that the steady-state level of KLF10 transcripts was preferentially higher in Vγ4+ γδ27− cells than in other γδ subsets, we could postulate that Vγ1Vγ4 γδ27− subset-specific factors might dampen the inhibitory effect of KLF10 on IL-7-mediated homeostasis by downregulating KLF10 transcription.

Our analysis of surface CD5 expressed on emergent immature γδ thymocytes clearly indicated discrete TCR-signal engagements for Vγ chains. Immature Vγ4+ thymocytes adopted relatively low and narrow-ranged CD5 expression regardless of CD27 expression, seemingly consistent with the ligand-independent signaling of Vγ4+Vδ5+ TCR (10). This also suggests that Vγ4+ subsets may require relatively weak TCR-signal engagement for thymic emergence compared with other Vγ subsets, in support of the previous report that Vγ6+ thymocytes may depend on strong TCR signaling (11, 26, 41). Indeed, the surface CD5 expression of the peripheral Vγ4+ γδ27− subset was apparently lower than that of the Vγ1Vγ4 (and presumably Vγ6+) γδ27− subset (17). Most of all, we confirmed that innate-like γδ-17 cells received relatively weak TCR-signal strength during thymic development by identifying IL-17-committed γδ T cells as CD5loCD127hi γδ27− cells predominantly composed of Vγ4+ and Vγ1Vγ4 subsets.

Seemingly, the lower expression of CD5 on immature Vγ4+ thymocytes and the subsequent super-induction of IL-7Rα on γδ27− thymocytes upon maturation might indicate the initial engagement of weak TCR-signal strength for the Vγ4 wave, followed by heavy reliance upon IL-7 signaling for functional maturation during development (9, 25, 26). Considering that KLF10 transcription could be induced by either TCR or IL-7 signaling, we could anticipate that expression of the KLF10 transcript would be relatively low in immature Vγ4+ thymocytes compared with other thymic immature Vγ subsets and then increase after maturation; indeed, the expected results were obtained from the public data resources of ImmGen (37). Interestingly, in contrast to KLF10, Sox13 transcription is suppressed by both TCR (36) and IL-7 stimuli (data not shown). Above all, Sox13 is highly expressed in thymic γδ progenitors as a γδ-lineage specific marker, but after maturation dramatically decreased with relatively higher expression in γδ-17 thymocytes than in γδ-IFN-γ thymocytes (36, 42). Of note, there is evidence that Sox13 is essential for the development of Vγ4+ γδ-17 cells, as it is abundant in Vγ4+ rather than in Vγ4 thymocytes at an immature stage (22, 37, 43). However, we found similar levels of Sox13 transcripts in the peripheral Vγ4+ γδ27− subset between WT and KO mice (data not shown), suggesting that Sox13 may not be associated with the selective effect of KLF10 deficiency on Vγ4+ γδ27− cell development (22, 43). This notwithstanding, the lower levels of KLF10 and higher levels of Sox13 in immature Vγ4+ thymocytes, with lower CD5 expression, imply engagement of weak-TCR-signal strength in Vγ4+ γδ-17 thymic emergence. Furthermore, the more substantial involvement of KLF10 and Sox13 in Vγ4+ γδ-17 cell development reinforced distinct developmental requirements for Vγ4+ and Vγ6+ γδ-17 cells (11, 26, 43).

We showed that the intensity of surface CD5 was mildly but significantly increased in both thymic mature Vγ4+ γδ27− cells and TCRβhiCD69+ DP cells of KO mice. This analogous CD5 alteration by KLF10 deficiency could support the idea of close similarity between Vγ4+ cells and DP cells at an immature stage (25). The close relationship between KLF10 and genes involved in metabolic processes, whose expression was lower in these two populations, provided mechanistic insight into thymic maturation of CD5intVγ4+ γδ-17 cells under KLF10 deficiency. Moreover, a recent report revealed that KLF10 binds to a nutritional regulatory element in the promoter region of SREBP-1c that is critical for glucose and lipid metabolism (44). On the other hand, maturational transition of γδ T cells seems quite similar to “negative selection” in the light of the facts that surface CD5 is commonly reduced after maturation of γδ T cells and the CD5 level correlates with the strength of TCR signal initially perceived (35, 45, 46).

We suggest that thymic programming for the generation of Vγ4+ γδ-17 cells is negatively regulated by KLF10, with many questions remaining to be answered. In particular, clear elucidation of the quantitatively and qualitatively distinct engagements of the TCR signal, whose role in γδ-17 effector decisions is still controversial, will advance identification of the developmental mechanism of Vγ4+ γδ-17 cells under the transcriptional control of KLF10 (26); it is possible that Vγ chains transmit distinct TCR signals caused by differences in either intrinsic modality or extrinsic factors, such as selecting ligands or that a unique TCR signal (strength and duration) may trigger the expression of genes encoding certain Vγ chains (10). Moreover, determining whether KLF10 is associated with signal circuits of inherited (or intrinsic) TFs specific to Vγ4+ γδ-17 cell development and with the timing of generation of the Vγ4 wave will give insight into γδ effector subset diversification (24, 47, 48).

Ethics Statement

All animals were bred and maintained under specific pathogen-free conditions at the Institute of Laboratory Animal Resource Seoul National University and treated in accordance with institutional guidelines that were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (SNU-140930-4-1).

Author Contributions

C-HY conceived the idea. C-HY and GK designed the experiments and wrote the manuscript. GK, MG, SK, KK, Y-CK, and CK performed the experiments. GK interpreted the data. J-HC, W-KL, K-DS, HC, Y-MP, and SH provided critical comments. All authors contributed to discussion of the results followed by writing and reviewing the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.


We thank the staffs at Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources, Seoul National University for outstanding experimental assistance.


This study was supported by the grants from NRF-2015R1D1A1A02061577, Next-Generation BioGreen 21 Program (PJ01112401), Rural Development Administration and SNU-Yonsei Research Cooperation Program through Seoul National University, and IBS-R005-D1 from the Institute for Basic Science (to J-HC), Korean Ministry of Science, Information/Communication Technology and Future Planning, Republic of Korea.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at


1. Cao Z, Wara AK, Icli B, Sun X, Packard RR, Esen F, et al. Kruppel-like factor KLF10 targets transforming growth factor-beta1 to regulate CD4(+)CD25(-) T cells and T regulatory cells. J Biol Chem (2009) 284(37):24914–24. doi:10.1074/jbc.M109.000059

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Venuprasad K, Huang H, Harada Y, Elly C, Subramaniam M, Spelsberg T, et al. The E3 ubiquitin ligase Itch regulates expression of transcription factor Foxp3 and airway inflammation by enhancing the function of transcription factor TIEG1. Nat Immunol (2008) 9(3):245–53. doi:10.1038/ni1564

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Peng DJ, Zeng M, Muromoto R, Matsuda T, Shimoda K, Subramaniam M, et al. Noncanonical K27-linked polyubiquitination of TIEG1 regulates Foxp3 expression and tumor growth. J Immunol (2011) 186(10):5638–47. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1003801

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Chien YH, Zeng X, Prinz I. The natural and the inducible: interleukin (IL)-17-producing gammadelta T cells. Trends Immunol (2013) 34(4):151–4. doi:10.1016/

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Do JS, Fink PJ, Li L, Spolski R, Robinson J, Leonard WJ, et al. Cutting edge: spontaneous development of IL-17-producing gamma delta T cells in the thymus occurs via a TGF-beta 1-dependent mechanism. J Immunol (2010) 184(4):1675–9. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.0903539

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Roark CL, Simonian PL, Fontenot AP, Born WK, O’Brien RL. gammadelta T cells: an important source of IL-17. Curr Opin Immunol (2008) 20(3):353–7. doi:10.1016/j.coi.2008.03.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Cai Y, Shen X, Ding C, Qi C, Li K, Li X, et al. Pivotal role of dermal IL-17-producing gammadelta T cells in skin inflammation. Immunity (2011) 35(4):596–610. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2011.08.001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Sutton CE, Lalor SJ, Sweeney CM, Brereton CF, Lavelle EC, Mills KH. Interleukin-1 and IL-23 induce innate IL-17 production from gammadelta T cells, amplifying Th17 responses and autoimmunity. Immunity (2009) 31(2):331–41. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2009.08.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Michel ML, Pang DJ, Haque SF, Potocnik AJ, Pennington DJ, Hayday AC. Interleukin 7 (IL-7) selectively promotes mouse and human IL-17-producing gammadelta cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2012) 109(43):17549–54. doi:10.1073/pnas.1204327109

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Jensen KD, Su X, Shin S, Li L, Youssef S, Yamasaki S, et al. Thymic selection determines gammadelta T cell effector fate: antigen-naive cells make interleukin-17 and antigen-experienced cells make interferon gamma. Immunity (2008) 29(1):90–100. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2008.04.022

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Munoz-Ruiz M, Ribot JC, Grosso AR, Goncalves-Sousa N, Pamplona A, Pennington DJ, et al. TCR signal strength controls thymic differentiation of discrete proinflammatory gammadelta T cell subsets. Nat Immunol (2016) 17(6):721–7. doi:10.1038/ni.3424

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Nunez-Cruz S, Aguado E, Richelme S, Chetaille B, Mura AM, Richelme M, et al. LAT regulates gammadelta T cell homeostasis and differentiation. Nat Immunol (2003) 4(10):999–1008. doi:10.1038/ni977

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Wencker M, Turchinovich G, Di Marco Barros R, Deban L, Jandke A, Cope A, et al. Innate-like T cells straddle innate and adaptive immunity by altering antigen-receptor responsiveness. Nat Immunol (2014) 15(1):80–7. doi:10.1038/ni.2773

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Ribot JC, Chaves-Ferreira M, d’Orey F, Wencker M, Goncalves-Sousa N, Decalf J, et al. Cutting edge: adaptive versus innate receptor signals selectively control the pool sizes of murine IFN-gamma- or IL-17-producing gammadelta T cells upon infection. J Immunol (2010) 185(11):6421–5. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1002283

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Baccala R, Witherden D, Gonzalez-Quintial R, Dummer W, Surh CD, Havran WL, et al. Gamma delta T cell homeostasis is controlled by IL-7 and IL-15 together with subset-specific factors. J Immunol (2005) 174(8):4606–12. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.174.8.4606

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Corpuz TM, Stolp J, Kim HO, Pinget GV, Gray DH, Cho JH, et al. Differential responsiveness of innate-like IL-17- and IFN-gamma-producing gammadelta T cells to homeostatic cytokines. J Immunol (2016) 196(2):645–54. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1502082

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Heilig JS, Tonegawa S. Diversity of murine gamma genes and expression in fetal and adult T lymphocytes. Nature (1986) 322(6082):836–40. doi:10.1038/322836a0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Haas JD, Gonzalez FH, Schmitz S, Chennupati V, Fohse L, Kremmer E, et al. CCR6 and NK1.1 distinguish between IL-17A and IFN-gamma-producing gammadelta effector T cells. Eur J Immunol (2009) 39(12):3488–97. doi:10.1002/eji.200939922

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Haas JD, Ravens S, Duber S, Sandrock I, Oberdorfer L, Kashani E, et al. Development of interleukin-17-producing gammadelta T cells is restricted to a functional embryonic wave. Immunity (2012) 37(1):48–59. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2012.06.003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Gray EE, Suzuki K, Cyster JG. Cutting edge: identification of a motile IL-17-producing gammadelta T cell population in the dermis. J Immunol (2011) 186(11):6091–5. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1100427

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Shibata K, Yamada H, Nakamura R, Sun X, Itsumi M, Yoshikai Y. Identification of CD25+ gamma delta T cells as fetal thymus-derived naturally occurring IL-17 producers. J Immunol (2008) 181(9):5940–7. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.181.9.5940

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Gray EE, Ramirez-Valle F, Xu Y, Wu S, Wu Z, Karjalainen KE, et al. Deficiency in IL-17-committed Vgamma4(+) gammadelta T cells in a spontaneous Sox13-mutant CD45.1(+) congenic mouse substrain provides protection from dermatitis. Nat Immunol (2013) 14(6):584–92. doi:10.1038/ni.2585

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Cai Y, Xue F, Fleming C, Yang J, Ding C, Ma Y, et al. Differential developmental requirement and peripheral regulation for dermal Vgamma4 and Vgamma6T17 cells in health and inflammation. Nat Commun (2014) 5:3986. doi:10.1038/ncomms4986

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Kisielow J, Kopf M. The origin and fate of gammadeltaT cell subsets. Curr Opin Immunol (2013) 25(2):181–8. doi:10.1016/j.coi.2013.03.002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Narayan K, Sylvia KE, Malhotra N, Yin CC, Martens G, Vallerskog T, et al. Intrathymic programming of effector fates in three molecularly distinct gammadelta T cell subtypes. Nat Immunol (2012) 13(5):511–8. doi:10.1038/ni.2247

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Munoz-Ruiz M, Sumaria N, Pennington DJ, Silva-Santos B. Thymic determinants of gammadelta T cell differentiation. Trends Immunol (2017) 38(5):336–44. doi:10.1016/

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Smith E, von Vietinghoff S, Stark MA, Zarbock A, Sanders JM, Duley A, et al. T-lineage cells require the thymus but not VDJ recombination to produce IL-17A and regulate granulopoiesis in vivo. J Immunol (2009) 183(9):5685–93. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.0900887

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Song KD, Kim DJ, Lee JE, Yun CH, Lee WK. KLF10, transforming growth factor-beta-inducible early gene 1, acts as a tumor suppressor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun (2012) 419(2):388–94. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.02.032

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Krutzik PO, Nolan GP. Intracellular phospho-protein staining techniques for flow cytometry: monitoring single cell signaling events. Cytometry A (2003) 55(2):61–70. doi:10.1002/cyto.a.10072

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Bekiaris V, Sedy JR, Macauley MG, Rhode-Kurnow A, Ware CF. The inhibitory receptor BTLA controls gammadelta T cell homeostasis and inflammatory responses. Immunity (2013) 39(6):1082–94. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2013.10.017

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Papadakis KA, Krempski J, Reiter J, Svingen P, Xiong Y, Sarmento OF, et al. Kruppel-like factor KLF10 regulates transforming growth factor receptor II expression and TGF-beta signaling in CD8+ T lymphocytes. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol (2015) 308(5):C362–71. doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00262.2014

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Ribot JC, deBarros A, Pang DJ, Neves JF, Peperzak V, Roberts SJ, et al. CD27 is a thymic determinant of the balance between interferon-gamma- and interleukin 17-producing gammadelta T cell subsets. Nat Immunol (2009) 10(4):427–36. doi:10.1038/ni.1717

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Coffey F, Lee SY, Buus TB, Lauritsen JP, Wong GW, Joachims ML, et al. The TCR ligand-inducible expression of CD73 marks gammadelta lineage commitment and a metastable intermediate in effector specification. J Exp Med (2014) 211(2):329–43. doi:10.1084/jem.20131540

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Pereira P, Gerber D, Huang SY, Tonegawa S. Ontogenic development and tissue distribution of V gamma 1-expressing gamma/delta T lymphocytes in normal mice. J Exp Med (1995) 182(6):1921–30. doi:10.1084/jem.182.6.1921

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Azzam HS, DeJarnette JB, Huang K, Emmons R, Park CS, Sommers CL, et al. Fine tuning of TCR signaling by CD5. J Immunol (2001) 166(9):5464–72. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.166.9.5464

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Turchinovich G, Hayday AC. Skint-1 identifies a common molecular mechanism for the development of interferon-gamma-secreting versus interleukin-17-secreting gammadelta T cells. Immunity (2011) 35(1):59–68. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2011.04.018

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Heng TS, Painter MW, Immunological Genome Project C. The Immunological Genome Project: networks of gene expression in immune cells. Nat Immunol (2008) 9(10):1091–4. doi:10.1038/ni1008-1091

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Sims JE, Smith DE. The IL-1 family: regulators of immunity. Nat Rev Immunol (2010) 10(2):89–102. doi:10.1038/nri2691

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Hunter CA, Jones SA. IL-6 as a keystone cytokine in health and disease. Nat Immunol (2015) 16(5):448–57. doi:10.1038/ni.3153

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Strasser A. The role of BH3-only proteins in the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol (2005) 5(3):189–200. doi:10.1038/nri1568

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Paget C, Chow MT, Gherardin NA, Beavis PA, Uldrich AP, Duret H, et al. CD3bright signals on gammadelta T cells identify IL-17A-producing Vgamma6Vdelta1+ T cells. Immunol Cell Biol (2015) 93(2):198–212. doi:10.1038/icb.2014.94

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Melichar HJ, Narayan K, Der SD, Hiraoka Y, Gardiol N, Jeannet G, et al. Regulation of gammadelta versus alphabeta T lymphocyte differentiation by the transcription factor SOX13. Science (2007) 315(5809):230–3. doi:10.1126/science.1135344

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Malhotra N, Narayan K, Cho OH, Sylvia KE, Yin C, Melichar H, et al. A network of high-mobility group box transcription factors programs innate interleukin-17 production. Immunity (2013) 38(4):681–93. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2013.01.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Takeuchi Y, Yahagi N, Aita Y, Murayama Y, Sawada Y, Piao X, et al. KLF15 enables rapid switching between lipogenesis and gluconeogenesis during fasting. Cell Rep (2016) 16(9):2373–86. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2016.07.069

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Persaud SP, Parker CR, Lo WL, Weber KS, Allen PM. Intrinsic CD4+ T cell sensitivity and response to a pathogen are set and sustained by avidity for thymic and peripheral complexes of self peptide and MHC. Nat Immunol (2014) 15(3):266–74. doi:10.1038/ni.2822

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Saini M, Sinclair C, Marshall D, Tolaini M, Sakaguchi S, Seddon B. Regulation of Zap70 expression during thymocyte development enables temporal separation of CD4 and CD8 repertoire selection at different signaling thresholds. Sci Signal (2010) 3(114):ra23. doi:10.1126/scisignal.2000702

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Turchinovich G, Pennington DJ. T cell receptor signalling in gammadelta cell development: strength isn’t everything. Trends Immunol (2011) 32(12):567–73. doi:10.1016/

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Kang J, Malhotra N. Transcription factor networks directing the development, function, and evolution of innate lymphoid effectors. Annu Rev Immunol (2015) 33:505–38. doi:10.1146/annurev-immunol-032414-112025

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: KLF10, γδ T cells, IL-17, homeostasis, Innate-like γδ-17

Citation: Kim G, Gu MJ, Kim SJ, Ko KH, Kye Y-C, Kim CG, Cho J-H, Lee W-K, Song K-D, Chu H, Park Y-M, Han SH and Yun C-H (2018) Transcription Factor KLF10 Constrains IL-17-Committed Vγ4+ γδ T Cells. Front. Immunol. 9:196. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00196

Received: 04 August 2017; Accepted: 23 January 2018;
Published: 28 February 2018

Edited by:

Wanjun Chen, National Institutes of Health (NIH), United States

Reviewed by:

Vasileios Bekiaris, Technical University of Denmark, Denmark
Ashutosh Chaudhry, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States

Copyright: © 2018 Kim, Gu, Kim, Ko, Kye, Kim, Cho, Lee, Song, Chu, Park, Han and Yun. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Cheol-Heui Yun,