Clinical Results in Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma Suggest High Potential of Pretargeted Immuno-PET for Tumor Imaging and Theranostic Approaches

Introduction

Targeting radionuclides to tumor cells using monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) has emerged for imaging and therapy purposes (1). The production of chimeric or humanized mAbs with lower immunogenicity than murine mAbs prompted the clinical development of immunotherapy, and the anti-tumor effects reported with trastuzumab in breast cancer (BC) expressing HER2 and of the anti-CD20 rituximab in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma demonstrated for the first time the high potential of mAbs for cancer therapy. The clinical successes of rituximab and trastuzumab have accelerated the research for new target membrane proteins in different types of malignant tumors. Some monoclonal antibodies have also been radiolabeled for tumor imaging by scintigraphy with promising initial results. Yet, in spite of mAbs' good specificity, the expected success was limited by the low resolution of the images. Thanks to significant technical progress in the production of positron emitters and their labeling methods, as well as the development of more sensitive detectors and specific software, the last decade has seen the development of a wide range of new PET radiopharmaceuticals. In medical practice, the identification of biomarkers is gradually becoming a prerequisite for any treatment decision, along with the approach of personalized medicine. Immuno-PET, which combines the high sensitivity and resolution of a PET camera with mAb's specificity, is an excellent candidate for this new concept (2, 3). mAbs labeled with radionuclides represent promising probes for theranostic approaches, providing a non-invasive solution for in vivo evaluation of target expression, distribution and accessibility, and for obtaining reliable information for diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy. Based on immunoPET, treatment strategies could be adapted to each patient before pricey and potentially toxic treatments are administered (4, 5).

Medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) accounts for <10% of all thyroid cancers (6). After initial surgery, serum calcitonin is used to monitor residual disease, which is still detectable in nearly 20% of patients after surgery. Imaging including neck ultrasound, neck and chest computed tomography (CT), liver contrast-enhanced CT or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and spine and pelvis bone MRI are recommended when calcitonin exceeds 150 pg/ml (7). Due to their ability to characterize and quantify cancer molecular processes, ¹⁸F-DOPA or ¹⁸F-FDG PET tracers also have a major interest in patients with recurrent MTC and offer great potential as surrogate biomarkers, useful for early response evaluation and prediction of outcomes (8–11).

MTC is characterized by a high and homogeneous expression of ACE. Several clinical trials have shown pretargeted immunoscintigraphy's sensitivity, performed using the Affinity Enhancement System (AES) based on the injection of murine or chimeric anti-CEA bispecific antibodies (BsMAb) and pretargeted haptenpeptides radiolabeled with ¹¹¹In or ¹³¹I (12, 13). Prolonged tumor efficacy was also observed using therapeutic haptens radiolabeled with ¹³¹I (14). These results and the high potential of pretargeting reported in other solid tumors using different radioimmunoconjugates suggested that pretargeted peptides labeled with PET emitters would take advantage of the better sensitivity and resolution of PET compared to SPECT and provide high sensitivity and specificity imaging under good conditions of radiation protection and dosimetry (15–17). However, no clinical study has yet compared pretargeted immuno-PET with pretargeted immuno-SPECT.

This review focuses on MTC as an example, but the same pretargeting technique has been applied with success for clinical PET imaging of other CEA-expressing tumors and, in mice, to other target antigens (18). Other pretargeting systems, in particular those exploiting bio-orthogonal chemistry, also appear interesting in preclinical animal models, suggesting the high potential of pretargeting for diagnostic or theranostic applications (19).

Choice of Radionuclide for Immuno-PET

For nearly 30 years, mAbs have been labeled with gamma-emitting radionuclides, such as ¹³¹I, ^99mTc, or ¹¹¹In for planar or Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) imaging. However, the sensitivity of these techniques is low, the resolution poor and accurate quantitative information cannot be obtained. PET provides quantitative information and has a better spatial resolution that allows for good delineation of tumors and organs. In addition, exact attenuation correction, precise dispersion correction, improved sensitivity, good signal-to-noise ratios, and the ability to perform true whole body imaging within a reasonable time frame are key factors in the outperformance of PET over SPECT.

Marrying mAbs and PET emitters requires an appropriate match between the biologic half-life of the protein and the physical half-life of the isotope to achieve optimal tumor-to-background activity ratios (4, 5). Indeed, intact mAbs have a circulation time of several days, and longer imaging windows allow for both the accumulation of the tracer in the target tissue and the clearance of unbound tracer from the blood pool. This in turn leads to improved image contrast and tumor-to-background activity ratios. ⁸⁹Zr and ¹²⁴I are well suited to the labeling of large molecules, such as intact mAbs. The long half-life also offers an advantage for logistics related to transportation. ⁶⁴Cu, with an intermediate half- life of 12.7 h, can be used for labeling a large number of molecules of different sizes ¹⁸F or ⁶⁸Ga, with their short half-life, may be used to label small-size molecules, such as peptides or small molecular weight binding proteins, that distribute rapidly in the body. They are appropriate for pretargeted PET imaging, as shown for ⁶⁸Ga in the studies discussed here. ¹⁸F may also be used to label the haptens or small molecular weight tracers for pretargeting and, for example, this was done in preclinical studies with a NOTA-derivatized hapten by the formation of an aluminum-fluoride complex (20, 21).

From a “theranostic” perspective, the pairs of beta+/beta emitting radionuclides (¹²⁴I/¹³¹I, ⁸⁶Y/⁹⁰Y, ⁶⁴Cu/⁶⁷Cu, ⁴⁴Sc/⁴⁷ Sc) are very promising as the same distribution is expected both for imaging dosimetry and therapy.

Other considerations must also be taken into account when selecting appropriate radionuclides. In addition to the half-life, the existence of concomitant gamma emissions will have significant effects on the radiation dose received by the patient. Positron range may affect resolution if the positron travels a significant distance before annihilation. Finally, additional factors to consider include cost and availability.

Pretargeting for Immuno-PET

Since the first clinical pretargeted scintigraphy and radioimmunotherapy clinical studies discussed previously (12–14), new pretargeting reagents for the AES method have been designed (20–23). TF2 is an engineered BsMAb composed of anti-hapten Fab-fragment derived from the murine 679 antibody recognizing the histamine-succinyl-glycine (HSG) motif, and two humanized anti-CEA Fab-fragments derived from the hMN-14 antibody, formed into a trivalent 157 kD protein by the Dock-and-Lock^® procedure (22). IMP288 is a bivalent HSG hapten that can be labeled with a variety of radionuclides for therapy (⁹⁰Y and ¹⁷⁷Lu), scintigraphy (¹¹¹In) or PET (¹²⁴I, ⁶⁸Ga, and ¹⁸F) (20, 21, 23). The clinical implementation of pretargeting requires a first phase to optimize the BsMAb and peptide molar doses and a delay between the two injections (24–27). The first clinical results were reported using TF2/¹⁷⁷Lu-IMP288 in colorectal carcinoma patients. Fast tumor uptake and high tumor-to-background activity ratios were observed within a few hours (24, 25). These results using TF2/¹⁷⁷Lu-IMP288 were confirmed in a phase I clinical trial performed in patients with CEA-positive lung cancer (27). This phase I study determined that a pretargeting delay of 24 h between the TF2 and the radiolabeled peptide injections was considered the best compromise between the high tumor uptake required to deliver a high irradiation dose to tumor cells and a high tumor-to-background activity ratio to reduce irradiation of normal tissues. Along the same line, high doses of TF2 (75 mg/m²) were used to deliver sufficient irradiation using a 10:1 TF2: hapten molar ratio. The rapid distribution of the reagents observed in these therapy trials, indicated that that labeling with the short-lived radionuclides, ⁶⁸Ga or ¹⁸F, for PET should be feasible. Whereas, ¹⁸F allows PET imaging with better resolution than ⁶⁸Ga possibly with lower cost, the choice between ⁶⁸Ga and ¹⁸F would mostly depend on the logistics of the clinical centers. With ⁶⁸Ga having the advantage of availability via a generator (20), the imaging performance of immuno-PET using TF2/⁶⁸Ga-IMP288 was tested in an orthotopic murine xenograft model of human colonic liver metastases (28). ⁶⁸Ga-immuno-PET allowed for better tumor/organ ratios compared to ¹⁸FDG-PET (P < 0.05) for both imaging and biodistribution. Sixty-seven percent of tumors were detected with ⁶⁸Ga-immuno-PET vs. 31% with ¹⁸FDG PET (P = 0.049). For tumors <200 mg, the sensitivity was 44% with ⁶⁸Ga-immuno-PET vs. 0% for ¹⁸FDG PET (P = 0.031). Finally, tumor uptake measured on PET images was strongly correlated to biodistribution analyses (r² = 0.85).

Preliminary Results of Pretargeting Immuno-PET in MTC Patients

A pilot clinical study was designed in relapsed MTC patients to transfer TF2 /⁶⁸Ga-IMP288 pretargeting to the clinic. The first part of the study aimed at determining the best pretargeting parameters. Different cohorts of patients were injected with variable TF2 and IMP288 molar doses at variable pretargeting delays. The second part was designed to assess immuno-PET performance. Adults with a histological diagnosis of MTC treated by complete surgery and presenting a calcitonin serum level ≥150 pg/ml, with at least one lesion ≥10 mm on conventional imaging, were eligible. The results of the first part of the study have been published, and the analysis of the second part is in progress (29). First, the molar doses of TF2 and hapten were reduced as compared to the therapy studies, because the injected activity of short-lived ⁶⁸Ga was set to 150 MBq, as compared to GBq activities of ¹⁷⁷Lu for therapy. According to a PET semi-quantitative analysis and pharmacokinetic studies, the 30-h pretargeting delay between BsMAb and peptide injections was the most favorable for imaging: tumor uptake was not significantly reduced as compared to 24-h and tumor/background ratios were better. Pretargeted immuno-PET detected MTC confirmed foci in all patients except one. Our previous studies showed that CEA expression seemed to be almost constant in MTC, and that high sensitivity PET imaging using CEA as a target would detect the disease independently of the prognosis, in contrast to ¹⁸FDG or ¹⁸F-DOPA PET/CT (10, 12, 13, 29). The preliminary results obtained in the first 12 MTC patients already suggested that high tumor contrast can be obtained using this novel whole-body imaging (Figure 1) (29, 30). In this small cohort of metastatic patients with a median calcitonin of 915 pg/ml (249–5,300) and CEA of 29.5 ng/ml (7.4–257), a total of 110 lesions were detected by immuno-PET, whereas CT detected 59 lesions, bone MRI 12 lesions, liver MRI 13 lesions, and ¹⁸F-DOPA-PET/CT 63 lesions. Since pathological confirmation was generally not possible, in the MTC studies and in other pathologies such as colorectal cancer and breast cancer discussed below, the Gold Standard was defined as follow. A lesion detected by immuno-PET was considered to be related to cancer when it was confirmed by histology and/or detected by another imaging method and/or confirmed by follow-up. Complementary imaging (for example CT, MRI, ¹⁸F-DOPA PET and ¹⁸FDG PET in the MTC study) could be prescribed within 3 months after immuno-PET to confirm anomalies detected by immuno-PET but not visualized on the inclusion imaging assessment. The preliminary analysis then resulted in an overall sensitivity of 89% for immuno-PET, with 100% sensitivity for lymph nodes and liver, 87% for bone, and 42% for lungs. Overall sensitivities of CT, bone MRI, liver MRI and ¹⁸F-DOPA-PET/CT were 77, 92, 76, and 66%, respectively.

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. Immuno-PET performed using TF2 BsMAb and ⁶⁸Ga-IMP288 peptide in a MTC patient with a spinal lesion.

Promising Performance of Pretargeted ⁶⁸Ga-IMP288 in Other CEA-Positive Tumors

CEA is expressed in other solid tumors, and pretargeted immuno-PET has also been assessed with promising results in BC and colorectal carcinoma (CRC). Preliminary results have been reported at international congresses (31, 32). In the 9 metastatic BC patients enrolled in an optimization immuno-PET study evaluating TF2 /⁶⁸Ga-IMP288, with median CA15-3 was 249.3 kUI/L (40–2,448) and a median CEA of 76 μg/L (9.5–1359.0), pretargeted anti-CEA immuno-PET allowed the detection of a total of 533 lesions, whereas 245 lesions were detected by CT, 160 by bone MRI, and 425 by ¹⁸FDG-PET/CT (Figure 2). Immuno-PET showed 92.5% overall sensitivity, with, respectively, 100% sensitivity for bone, liver, skin, and brain, 91% for lymph nodes, and 28.5% for lung. Brain lesions were only seen on immuno-PET imaging and secondly confirmed by MRI.

FIGURE 2

Figure 2. (A) FDG PET/CT, (B) Immuno-PET with TF2 and ⁶⁸Ga-IMP288 peptide showing multiple spine bone foci, and (C) STIR TSE bone MRI showing multiple spine bone abnormalities in a BC patient.

Another pilot study included 11 patients who received an imaging work-up for the diagnosis of metastases from CEA-expressing CRC, comprising TF2/⁶⁸Ga-IMP288 immuno-PET, ¹⁸FDG-PET, thoraco-abdominopelvic CT, liver MRI, and abdominal ultrasound scanning. In the per-patient analysis, immuno-PET was positive in 9/11 patients. The two negative patients were, respectively, one false-negative (single lung metastasis) and one true-negative (mediastinal sarcoidosis). On a per-lesion analysis, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were, respectively, 82, 25, 82, and 25% for the morphological assessment (CT + ultrasound + MRI); 76, 67, 87, and 33% for ¹⁸FDG-PET; and 88, 100, 100, 67% for immuno-PET (32).

These data show high performances of pretargeted immuno-PET in tumor detection, except for lung lesions. Several hypotheses can explain the low sensitivity in this organ. On the one hand, the current generations of CT scanners are very sensitive and can diagnose very small pulmonary nodules. Thus, since our Gold standard does not require histological evidence, micronodules considered as discretely progressive on follow up CT scans were validated as related to tumor. The very small size of some of these lesions could explain the low sensitivity of immuno-PET since immuno-PET images were recorded in “spontaneous breathing” thus underestimating the uptake in infra-centimetric pulmonary nodules due to the partial volume effect related to the amplitude of respiratory movements. On the other hand, immunoscintigraphy images recorded 5–10 days after hapten injection showed better sensitivity in lung lesions (10). So, it is possible that immuno-PET images have been recorded too early after hapten injection to allow the visualization of some infra-centimetric pulmonary nodules. Later images may have improved tumor contrast. A longer half-life radionuclide like ⁶⁴Cu, permitting later images, could improve PET sensitivity to detect lung nodules.

Other Pretargeting Systems

Pretargeted immuno-PET using the AES method also has been successfully assessed against other tumor antigens in preclinical models (18). TF12 is a trivalent BsMAb consisting in two anti-TROP-2 Fab fragments and one anti-HSG Fab fragment. Many epithelial cancers, including prostate cancer (PC) express the TROP-2 antigen. The potential of pretargeted immuno-PET with TF2 /⁶⁸Ga-IMP288, was studied in mice with subcutaneous and intraperitoneal PC3 human prostate tumors, using ¹⁸FDG-PET as a reference. ⁶⁸Ga-IMP288 demonstrated a rapid accumulation in the TF12 pretargeted subcutaneous tumors (7.2 ± 1.1% ID/g), and low blood levels and kidney uptake resulting in high tumor/blood ratios (17.4 ± 11.2) at 1 h p.i. ¹⁸FDG's uptake was significantly lower (3.4 ± 0.9% ID/g, P = 0.008), with lower tumor/blood ratios (3.0 ± 1.9, P = 0.011). Immuno-PET identified both subcutaneous and intraperitoneal tumors as small as 5 mm³, suggesting that the method was efficient for rapid, sensitive, and specific imaging of PC.

Recently, entirely different pretargeting approaches have been developed or revisited. One is based on the in vivo formation of an oligonucleotide duplex. A first oligonucleotide analog (e.g., peptide nucleic acid or PNA) is coupled to an antibody or binding protein (an anti-HER2 Affibody) for pretargeting of a radiolabeled complementary oligonucleotide analog (33). Good tumor targeting was achieved with a significant reduction in blood and kidney retention 1 h after activity injection, as compared to the directly-labeled Affibody in a human ovarian cancer model in mice. The other approach, which attracts even more interest, is based on bio-orthogonal chemistry, also known as click chemistry. While click chemistry became quite popular about 15 years ago for various coupling reactions in vitro, it was soon discovered that these very fast chemical reactions can occur in vivo as well with similar efficiency and specificity. They were soon proposed for pretargeting applications (34). The CC49 antibody recognizing the TAG72 antigen derivatized with trans-cyclooctene (TCO) was used for pretargeting ¹¹¹In-labeled DOTA-dipyridyltetrazine, demonstrating fast and high tumor activity uptake and high tumor-to-muscle ratios in a mouse model. This pioneering work was followed by a large number of preclinical investigations aiming at further improving the pretargeting performance by testing alternative bio-orthogonal chemistry reagents, adding a chase step between the injection of the antibody and that of the labeled compound, and also by applying bio-orthogonal pretargeting to small-binding proteins, such as diabodies or Affibodies. These efforts have been reviewed recently in a broad comparison of all pretargeting approaches by Altai and coworkers (19). Translation of such new pretargeting approaches to the clinic should come soon, both for PET imaging and therapy.

Conclusion

An increased interest for immuno-PET is found in the recent literature (17), where targeted therapies using antibodies are experiencing a considerable growth in cancer management. Immuno-PET can offer a non-invasive solution to quantitatively assess whole-body tumor biomarker cartography. Based on immuno-PET, treatment strategies could be adapted to each patient before costly and potentially toxic treatments are administered.

Pretargeted immuno-PET represents a sensitive and specific imaging method, with promising results reported in MTC and also in other solid tumors. Pretargeted immuno-PET could indeed be a specific diagnostic tool for tumor detection, but also a theranostic companion approach to select patients to be treated with radioimmunconjugates or antibody-drug conjugates.

Pretargeting has advantages and limitations. It can be used to visualize or treat tumor lesions, depending on the radionuclide used, for example by using ¹¹¹In and ^99mTc for SPECT imaging, ⁶⁸Ga or ¹⁸F for PET imaging, or ¹³¹I, ⁹⁰Y, and ¹⁷⁷Lu for radioimmunotherapy. Using BsMab as the pretargeting agent has several advantages: BsMAb can be humanized to minimize their immunogenicity and tailored to clear from the circulation more rapidly than intact IgG's. Then, together with the limited affinity of the BsMAb-hapten binding that allows for dissociation of BsMAb -hapten complexes in the circulation, there is no need for a clearing agent. Over the past decade, several improvements have been made to this system, resulting in a flexible, and efficient pretargeting system. However, it requires careful optimization, both for the design of the appropriate pretargeting reagents and for the definition of dosing and administration schedules. In addition, optimal reagents doses and injection schedules are not identical for imaging, where rapidly achieving high tumor to non-tumor activity ratios is the goal, and therapy where sufficient irradiation of tumors is also needed.Several roads of improvement exist. The non-covalent binding between the radiolabeled hapten and BsMAb on the surface of tumor cells limits the retention of the radiolabeled hapten-peptide in the tumor. Recent developments in the use of bio-orthogonal chemistry are very promising and represent an attractive alternative to the use of BsMAb. The question of cost should also be examined. Although these innovative technologies are certainly costly, but this could be acceptable if the advantage in patient selection for expensive therapies and drug development is confirmed. Large-scale, randomized, multicenter clinical trials are warranted.

Author Contributions

All authors listed have made a substantial, direct and intellectual contribution to the work, and approved it for publication.

Funding

This work has been supported in part by French DHOS INCA,the University Hospital of Nantes, the Fondation Avenir, the French National Agency for Research (Investissements d'Avenir IRON Labex n° ANR-11-LABX-0018-01 and ArronaxPlus Equipex n° ANR-11-EQPX-0004).

Conflict of Interest Statement

At the time the work was conducted, DG was Chairman of the Board, Chief Scientific Officer, and Chief Patent Officer of Immunomedics, Inc., and also Chairman of IBC Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

1. Goldenberg DM, DeLand F, Kim E, Bennett S, Primus FJ, van Nagell JR, et al. Use of radiolabeled antibodies to carcinoembryonic antigen for the detection and localization of diverse cancers by external photoscanning. N Engl J Med. (1978) 298:1384–6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197806222982503

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Wu AM. Antibodies and antimatter: the resurgence of immuno-PET. J Nucl Med Off Publ Soc Nucl Med. (2009) 50:2–5. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.056887

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Boerman OC, Oyen WJG. Immuno-PET of cancer: a revival of antibody imaging. J Nucl Med Off Publ Soc Nucl Med. (2011) 52:1171–2. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.111.089771

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Bailly C, Cléry P-F, Faivre-Chauvet A, Bourgeois M, Guérard F, Haddad F, et al. Immuno-PET for clinical theranostic approaches. Int J Mol Sci. (2016) 18:57. doi: 10.3390/ijms18010057

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Kraeber-Bodere F, Bailly C, Chérel M, Chatal J-F. ImmunoPET to help stratify patients for targeted therapies and to improve drug development. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. (2016) 43:2166–8. doi: 10.1007/s00259-016-3458-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Machens A, Schneyer U, Holzhausen H-J, Dralle H. Prospects of remission in medullary thyroid carcinoma according to basal calcitonin level. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2005) 90:2029–34. doi: 10.1210/jc.2004-1836

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Wells SA, Asa SL, Dralle H, Elisei R, Evans DB, Gagel RF, et al. Revised American thyroid association guidelines for the management of medullary thyroid carcinoma. Thyroid Off J Am Thyroid Assoc. (2015) 25:567–610. doi: 10.1089/thy.2014.0335

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Luster M, Karges W, Zeich K, Pauls S, Verburg FA, Dralle H, et al. Clinical value of 18-fluorine-fluorodihydroxyphenylalanine positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the follow-up of medullary thyroid carcinoma. Thyroid Off J Am Thyroid Assoc. (2010) 20:527–33. doi: 10.1089/thy.2009.0342

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Kauhanen S, Schalin-Jäntti C, Seppänen M, Kajander S, Virtanen S, Schildt J, et al. Complementary roles of ¹⁸F-DOPA PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT in medullary thyroid cancer. J Nucl Med Off Publ Soc Nucl Med. (2011) 52:1855–63. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.111.094771

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Oudoux A, Salaun P-Y, Bournaud C, Campion L, Ansquer C, Rousseau C, et al. Sensitivity and prognostic value of positron emission tomography with F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose and sensitivity of immunoscintigraphy in patients with medullary thyroid carcinoma treated with anticarcinoembryonic antigen-targeted radioimmunotherapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2007) 92:4590–7. doi: 10.1210/jc.2007-0938

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Verbeek HHG, Plukker JTM, Koopmans KP, de Groot JWB, Hofstra RMW, Muller Kobold AC, et al. Clinical relevance of 18F-FDG PET and 18F-DOPA PET in recurrent medullary thyroid carcinoma. J Nucl Med Off Publ Soc Nucl Med. (2012) 53:1863–71. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.112.105940

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Peltier P, Curtet C, Chatal JF, Le Doussal JM, Daniel G, Aillet G, et al. Radioimmunodetection of medullary thyroid cancer using a bispecific anti-CEA/anti-indium-DTPA antibody and an indium-111-labeled DTPA dimer. J Nucl Med Off Publ Soc Nucl Med. (1993) 34:1267–73.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

13. Barbet J, Peltier P, Bardet S, Vuillez JP, Bachelot I, Denet S, et al. Radioimmunodetection of medullary thyroid carcinoma using indium-111 bivalent hapten and anti-CEA x anti-DTPA-indium bispecific antibody. J Nucl Med Off Publ Soc Nucl Med. (1998) 39:1172–8.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

14. Salaun P-Y, Campion L, Bournaud C, Faivre-Chauvet A, Vuillez J-P, Taieb D, et al. Phase II trial of anticarcinoembryonic antigen pretargeted radioimmunotherapy in progressive metastatic medullary thyroid carcinoma: biomarker response and survival improvement. J Nucl Med Off Publ Soc Nucl Med. (2012) 53:1185–92. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.111.101865

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Baum RP, Prasad V, Müller D, Schuchardt C, Orlova A, Wennborg A, et al. Molecular imaging of HER2-expressing malignant tumors in breast cancer patients using synthetic ¹¹¹In- or ⁶⁸Ga-labeled affibody molecules. J Nucl Med Off Publ Soc Nucl Med. (2010) 51:892–7. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.109.073239

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Tamura K, Kurihara H, Yonemori K, Tsuda H, Suzuki J, Kono Y, et al. 64Cu-DOTA-trastuzumab PET imaging in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. J Nucl Med Off Publ Soc Nucl Med. (2013) 54:1869–75. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.112.118612

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Bensch F, van der Veen EL, Lub-de Hooge MN, Jorritsma-Smit A, Boellaard R, Kok IC, et al. ⁸⁹Zr-atezolizumab imaging as a non-invasive approach to assess clinical response to PD-L1 blockade in cancer. Nat Med. (2018) 24:1852–8. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0255-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. van Rij CM, Lütje S, Frielink C, Sharkey RM, Goldenberg DM, Franssen GM, et al. Pretargeted immuno-PET and radioimmunotherapy of prostate cancer with an anti-TROP-2 x anti-HSG bispecific antibody. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. (2013) 40:1377–83. doi: 10.1007/s00259-013-2434-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Altai M, Membreno R, Cook B, Tolmachev V, Zeglis BM. Pretargeted imaging and therapy. J Nucl Med Off Publ Soc Nucl Med. (2017) 58:1553–9. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.117.189944

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Schoffelen R, Sharkey RM, Goldenberg DM, Franssen G, McBride WJ, Rossi EA, et al. Pretargeted immuno-positron emission tomography imaging of carcinoembryonic antigen-expressing tumors with a bispecific antibody and a ⁶⁸Ga- and ¹⁸F-labeled hapten peptide in mice with human tumor xenografts. Mol Cancer Ther. (2010) 9:1019–27. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-09-0862

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. McBride WJ, Sharkey RM, Karacay H, D'Souza CA, Rossi EA, Laverman P, et al. A novel method of 18F radiolabeling for PET. J Nucl Med Off Publ Soc Nucl Med. (2009) 50:991–8. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.060418

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Rossi EA, Goldenberg DM, Cardillo TM, McBride WJ, Sharkey RM, Chang C-H. Stably tethered multifunctional structures of defined composition made by the dock and lock method for use in cancer targeting. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2006) 103:6841–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0600982103

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. McBride WJ, Zanzonico P, Sharkey RM, Norén C, Karacay H, Rossi EA, et al. Bispecific antibody pretargeting PET (immunoPET) with an ¹²⁴I-labeled hapten-peptide. J Nucl Med Off Publ Soc Nucl Med. (2006) 47:1678–88.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

24. Schoffelen R, Boerman OC, Goldenberg DM, Sharkey RM, van Herpen CML, Franssen GM, et al. Development of an imaging-guided CEA-pretargeted radionuclide treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: first clinical results. Br J Cancer. (2013) 109:934–42. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.376

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Schoffelen R, Woliner-van der Weg W, Visser EP, Goldenberg DM, Sharkey RM, McBride WJ, et al. Predictive patient-specific dosimetry and individualized dosing of pretargeted radioimmunotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. (2014) 41:1593–602. doi: 10.1007/s00259-014-2742-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Kraeber-Bodéré F, Rousseau C, Bodet-Milin C, Ferrer L, Faivre-Chauvet A, Campion L, et al. Targeting, toxicity, and efficacy of 2-step, pretargeted radioimmunotherapy using a chimeric bispecific antibody and ¹³¹I-labeled bivalent hapten in a phase I optimization clinical trial. J Nucl Med Off Publ Soc Nucl Med. (2006) 47:247–55.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

27. Bodet-Milin C, Ferrer L, Rauscher A, Masson D, Rbah-Vidal L, Faivre-Chauvet A, et al. Pharmacokinetics and dosimetry studies for optimization of pretargeted radioimmunotherapy in CEA expressing advanced lung cancer patient. Front Med Lausanne. (2015) 2:84. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2015.00084

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Foubert F, Gouard S, Saï-Maurel C, Chérel M, Faivre-Chauvet A, Goldenberg DM, et al. Sensitivity of pretargeted immunoPET using ⁶⁸Ga-peptide to detect colonic carcinoma liver metastases in a murine xenograft model: comparison with 18FDG PET-CT. Oncotarget. (2018) 9:27502–13. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.25514

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Bodet-Milin C, Faivre-Chauvet A, Carlier T, Rauscher A, Bourgeois M, Cerato E, et al. Immuno-PET using anti-CEA bispecific antibody and ⁶⁸Ga-labeled peptide in metastatic medullary thyroid carcinoma: clinical optimization of the pretargeting parameters in a First-in Human trial. J Nucl Med Off Publ Soc Nucl Med. (2016) 57:1505–11. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.116.172221

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Bodet-Milin C, Rousseau C, Ansquer C, Faivre-Chauvet A, Rauscher A, Carlier T, et al. High sensitivity of pretargeted immuno-PET using anti-carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) bispecific antibody and Ga-68-labeled peptide in metastatic medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 41:S314–5.

31. Rousseau C, Campone M, Rauscher A, Faivre-Chauvet A, Carlier T, Ferrer L, et al. Pretargeted immuno-PET with an anti-carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) bispecific antibody (BsMAb) and a ⁶⁸Ga-labeled hapten-peptide compared to conventional imaging and FDG-PET in metastatic breast cancer patients (BC): First results. Cancer Res. (2015) 75:P5-01-01-P5-01–01. doi: 10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS14-P5-01-01

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Touchefeu Y, Bailly C, Frampas E, Eugène T, Rousseau C, Faivre-Chauvet A, et al. Pre-targeted immuno-PET with bispecific anti-CEA antibody and Gallium-68-labeled IMP-288 peptide for imaging of metastates from colorectal cancer. In: JFHOD Annual Meeting, Paris (2019).

33. Honarvar H, Westerlund K, Altai M, Sandström M, Orlova A, Tolmachev V, et al. Feasibility of affibody molecule-based PNA-mediated radionuclide pretargeting of malignant tumors. Theranostics. (2016) 6:93–103. doi: 10.7150/thno.12766

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Rossin R, Verkerk PR, van den Bosch SM, Vulders RCM, Verel I, Lub J, et al. In vivo chemistry for pretargeted tumor imaging in live mice. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. (2010) 49:3375–8. doi: 10.1002/anie.200906294

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar