Volume 8 - 2021 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.655871
A Nephrologist Perspective on Obesity: From Kidney Injury to Clinical Management
- 1Nephrology Department, San Carlos Clinical University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
- 2Nephrology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- 3Nephrology Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain
Obesity is one of the epidemics of our era. Its prevalence is higher than 30% in the U.S. and it is estimated to increase by 50% in 2030. Obesity is associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality and it is known to be a cause of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Typically, obesity-related glomerulopathy (ORG) is ascribed to renal hemodynamic changes that lead to hyperfiltration, albuminuria and, finally, impairment in glomerular filtration rate due to glomerulosclerosis. Though not only hemodynamics are responsible for ORG: adipokines could cause local effects on mesangial and tubular cells and podocytes promoting maladaptive responses to hyperfiltration. Furthermore, hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus, two conditions generally associated with obesity, are both amplifiers of obesity injury in the renal parenchyma, as well as complications of overweight. As in the native kidney, obesity is also related to worse outcomes in kidney transplantation. Despite its impact in CKD and cardiovascular morbility and mortality, therapeutic strategies to fight against obesity-related CKD were limited for decades to renin-angiotensin blockade and bariatric surgery for patients who accomplished very restrictive criteria. Last years, different drugs have been approved or are under study for the treatment of obesity. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists are promising in obesity-related CKD since they have shown benefits in terms of losing weight in obese patients, as well as preventing the onset of macroalbuminuria and slowing the decline of eGFR in type 2 diabetes. These new families of glucose-lowering drugs are a new frontier to be crossed by nephrologists to stop obesity-related CKD progression.
Obesity is a major global public health problem, as the World Health in 1997 (1). Obesity is one of the epidemics of our era. Its prevalence is higher than 30% in the U.S. (WHO 2008) and it is estimated to increase by 50% in 2030. Obesity is defined by excessive body fat accumulation and its incidence is growing, as a result of changes in food habits and physical activity. Recent data indicate there are about 600 million people with obesity worldwide (2) and this number is supposed to increase. Obesity is a chronic and metabolic disease that has an important impact on several specialties such as endocrinology, cardiology and nephrology. As its incidence grows, obesity-related health problems will also be more common in medical specialties.
In Nephrology, obesity-related complications are more than just obese-related glomerulopathy that included glomerulomegaly and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS). Several mechanisms have been associated with the obesity-related kidney disease that would mainly be summarized in three groups: the hemodynamic, the adipose tissue-related and the insulin resistance pathways. Increased cardiovascular disease risk and high blood pressure are also health problems associated with obesity that nephrologists have to face. Furthermore, obesity is very common in patients who are in the kidney transplant waiting list, and its presence may be associated with worse allograph transplant function and prognosis. In this article, we will review the main pathophysiological pathways that link obesity and kidney injury, cardiovascular risk and diabetes. In addition, we will also focus on principal strategies in kidney transplantation and pharmaceutical therapies in this population.
Pathways Involved in Obesity-Related Kidney Disease
Obesity is an independent risk factor for the development of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and it has been related to a decreased glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and albuminuria (3–5). The development of CKD is closely related to other comorbidities that appear in conjunction with weight increase, namely hypertension or insulin-resistance and diabetes. Obese patients with kidney disease show glomerulomegaly and mesangial expansion (6, 7), which are a consequence of the increased blood flow and hyperfiltration that glomeruli suffer. Hyperfiltration in turn produces albuminuria which, together with other damaging mechanisms, leads to a progressive decline in GFR. Therefore, obesity is initially associated with hypertension and hyperfiltration, that produces albuminuria and subsequent loss of GFR.
Fat mass increase and weight gain activate several harmful pathways that simultaneously damage both the glomeruli and the tubules. Over time, the chronic activation of these pathways leads to progressive kidney injury, the development of albuminuria and CKD (8). Numerous mechanisms have been implied in obesity-related kidney disease, but many of them could be summarized within three main groups: the hemodynamic pathway, the adipose tissue-related pathway and the insulin resistance—hyperinsulinemia pathway (Figure 1). The sole purpose of this last classification is to facilitate the understanding of the mechanisms involved. During the development of kidney injury, the three pathways interact between them and their effect are modulated by other factors associated with obesity and the patient himself, such as diabetes, hypertension, age or sex.
Figure 1. Pathways involved in obesity-related kidney disease. Three main pathways involved (hemodynamic, adipose tissue related and insulin resistance—hyperinsulinemia pathways) have been highlighted in different colors. It can be observed how three pathways interact simultaneously to produce kidney injury. TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor α; MCP-1, monocyte chemoattractant protein 1; IL-6, interleukine 6; RAS, renin-angiotensin system; GFB, glomerular filtration barrier; SNS, sympathetic nervous system; Na+, sodium.
Regarding the hemodynamic pathway, it is proven that obesity increases tubular sodium reabsorption (7, 9). It leads to volume overload and facilitates the development of hypertension, which later contributes to glomerular hyperfiltration and renal microvascular damage. Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) activation is also described in obese patients and animal models (8, 10). RAS activation participates in hypertension development and sodium reabsorption. Moreover, it is a critical step that promotes glomerular hyperfiltration. Some studies postulate that in obesity, sodium reabsorption occurs initially in the first segments of the tubule, namely proximal tubule and the ascending loop of Henle (7, 9). Thus, sodium delivery to distal segments of the tubule is diminished and sensed by macula densa cells, activating tubuloglomerular feedback and inducing renin secretion by juxtaglomerular apparatus (7). This mechanism is similar to that which contributes to hyperfiltration in diabetic kidney disease. Studies performed in 1993 already demonstrated that dogs fed with high-fat diet showed increases renin secretion (9). Different mechanisms have been implied in this initial reabsorption in proximal tubular segments. Obesity induces insulin resistance which produces a compensatory increase in insulin secretion, and the increase in insulin availability has been implicated in increased sodium reabsorption in the proximal tubule and the ascending loop of Henle (9, 11). Recently, the interaction between the gut and the kidney has been described, where secreted gastrin after sodium ingestion acts in the kidney and increases sodium excretion in proximal tubular cells through NHE3 and Na+/K+-ATPase inhibition (12). In obese patients, an inappropriate diet rich in fats is usually accompanied by increased sodium ingestion, which may interfere with the described gastro-renal axis (8).
The adipose-tissue related pathway is linked to the increase of fat mass that occurs in obese patients. Adipocytes are active cells capable of secreting cytokines named adipokines (13). The increase of adipose tissue modulates adipokine secretion and larger adipocytes are associated with an increased inflammatory adipokine secretion (13). In obesity-related kidney disease, several adipokines have been implied such as leptin, adiponectin, tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) or interleukin 6 (IL-6) (7). Leptin secretion by adipose tissue is augmented in obese patients. Leptin has been related to increased activity of the sympathetic nervous system that contributes to hypertension, and leptin infusion in rats raised mean blood pressure (14). In addition, leptin promotes fatty acid oxidation, increasing oxidative stress and the secretion proinflammatory cytokines like monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1) (15). Conversely, adiponectin levels are decreased in obese patients (8). Lower adiponectin levels are associated with insulin resistance and impaired glucose and fatty acids metabolism (13). Besides, adiponectin is involved in glomerular filtration barrier structure regulation. In adiponectin knock-out mice podocyte foot process effacement has been evidenced which leads to an increase in albuminuria, and albuminuria is partially reversed with exogenous adiponectin administration (16). Moreover, in cultured podocytes adiponectin administration reduced permeability to albumin and oxidative stress through AMPK activation (16). Adipose-tissue also regulates RAS. In adipocytes, aldosterone and angiotensinogen secretion have been identified (17). Aldosterone secreted by fat tissue participates in adipocyte differentiation and is implicated in obesity-related hypertension (11, 18).
Insulin resistance is another pathway closely related to obesity-induced kidney disease. Insulin resistance is dependent on the increase in fat mass and the modulation of adipokines that occurs as a consequence of the latter (8). Insulin resistance promotes compensatory insulin secretion and insulin by itself has different effects on the kidney. Insulin acts directly on podocytes through insulin receptors themselves. AKT/mTOR intracellular pathway or glucose transporter 4 (GLUT4) have been related to its signaling (19). Insulin is implied in podocyte function and actin cytoskeleton modulation (20). Thus, augmented insulin secretion affects glomerular filtration barrier selectivity leading to proteinuria. In both rat models and cultured podocytes, insulin administration increases albumin permeability (21). Furthermore, insulin promoted oxidative stress in podocytes through NADPH oxidase activation (21). Insulin also acts on tubules and in cultured renal proximal tubular cells, it promotes TFG-β and collagen IV formation that eventually lead to tubulointerstitial fibrosis (22).
Obesity and Cardiovascular Disease
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is an important cause of death and disabilities worldwide. Clinical manifestations of CVD such as acute myocardial infarction, stroke or peripherical vasculopathy are attributed to atherosclerosis. The pathophysiological alterations of atherosclerosis are associated with chronic inflammation of the vessel wall that results from the accumulation of cholesterol-rich atherogenic Apo-B lipoproteins (VLDL, IDL, and LDL) in vascular intima. Lipoprotein accumulation leads to subsequent infiltration of macrophages and T cells of the arterial wall, producing atherosclerotic plaques (23, 24).
Obesity is considered as a major modifiable risk factor for different CVD, even after adjustments for the co-existing risk factors (25). Obesity itself has a deleterious effect on most of the major CVD risk factors: it increases plasma lipid levels, raises blood pressure and impairs glycaemic control in diabetes (26, 27). An increase of body weight, principally abdominal fat accumulation, is associated with a greater atherosclerosis progression. Post-mortem studies have described that both thickness of the adipose panicle and body mass index are associated with more extensive fatty streaks and raised lesions in the right coronary artery (28). In this regard, visceral obesity is also associated with an increased risk for cerebrovascular disease (29). Heart failure (HF) is frequent in obese patients, with approximately 11% of HF in men and 14% in women attributable to obesity (30). It is worth mentioning that an increase of every unit in body mass index (BMI) raises the risk of HF 5% in men and 7% in women (31). Strategies to achieve weight loss in obese patients may be beneficial to reduce the risk of CVD. Among all weight interventions, bariatric surgery has demonstrated beneficial effects on CVD morbidity and mortality (32). Recently, new pharmacologic therapeutics targeting the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor such as semaglutide are promising for weight loss in adults with obesity or overweight (33).
Obesity, Inflammation, Lipid Abnormalities, and Hypertension
As mentioned above, one of the mechanisms implied in the increased risk of CVD in obese patients is chronic inflammation driven by the adipose tissue. Adipose tissue is an active endocrine organ capable to synthesize and release into the circulation different types of hormones, peptides, and inflammatory molecules that promote endothelial dysfunction contributing to the development of atherosclerosis (34). Obesity-induced inflammation is marked by an increased infiltration and activation of innate and adaptive immune response. Macrophages are the predominant immune cells infiltrating the adipose tissue in obese individuals. They are polarized into proinflammatory M1 macrophages that secrete proinflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α, interleukins, and C-reactive protein, while simultaneously suppress anti-inflammatory cells and reduce the production of adiponectin, predisposing to increase oxidative stress (35). The inflammatory triggers are still unknown, however, obesity-induced adipose tissue remodeling provides many signals such as adipocyte death, hypoxia and mechanical stress that are capable of initiating an inflammatory response (36).
Lipid abnormalities as elevated triglyceride, VLDL, Apo B, and non-HDL-C levels are typically seen in obesity (37). There is an increase of small dense LDL and it is considered to be more pro-atherogenic than large LDL particles (38). Approximately 60–70% of obese patients are dyslipidemic while 50–60% of patients who are overweight are dyslipidemic (37), increasing risk for cardiovascular disease.
These abnormalities are produced by the greater delivery of free fatty acids to the liver from increased total and visceral adiposity, insulin resistance, and a pro-inflammatory state (37, 39). Adipokines, such as adiponectin and resistin are implicated in lipid metabolism. Levels of adiponectin are decreased in obese patients and are associated with increase in serum triglyceride and decreases in HDL-C levels (40). High levels of resistin have been observed in obesity and it is directly correlated with plasma triglyceride levels (41). Moreover, resistin has been shown to stimulate hepatic VLDL production and secretion due to an increase in the synthesis of Apo B, triglycerides, and cholesterol (41, 42). Finally, resistin is associated with a decrease in HDL-C and Apo A-I levels (42). Additionally, the pro-inflammatory cytokines such as tumoral necrosis factor stimulate lipolysis in adipocytes increasing circulating free fatty acid levels, which increases production of triglyceride by liver and also stimulate de novo production of VLDL and triglycerides (43). At higher levels the pro-inflammatory cytokines decrease the expression of lipoprotein lipase and increase the expression of angiopoietin like protein 4, an inhibitor of lipoprotein lipase (43, 44), delaying the clearance of triglyceride rich lipoproteins. Pro-inflammatory cytokines also affect HDL metabolism, decreasing the production of Apo A-I, the main protein constituent of HDL. These changes induced by pro-inflammatory cytokines result in a decrease in reverse cholesterol transport that plays a key role in preventing cholesterol accumulation in macrophages thereby reducing atherosclerosis (45).
Hypertension is frequent in obesity (46), and the mechanisms implicated are under investigation. Endothelial disfunction constitutes the initial alteration that initiates atherosclerotic disease. In this regard, it has been previously described in obese children and adolescents, that the number of circulating endothelial cells, a type of cells that reflect endothelial damage, are related with greater body fat percentage and hypertension. This suggests an association between body fat, endothelial dysfunction and hypertension (47). Obesity-induced inflammation, insulin resistance and high plasma leptin promote an impairment of synthesis of nitric oxide (NO) producing an imbalance between vasodilatation and vasoconstriction (48), favoring arterial stiffness and vascular remodeling what promotes arterial hypertension. It has also been observed that sympathetic activation plays an important role in obese-related hypertension. High intake of fat stimulates peripheral α1 and β-adrenergic receptors, increasing sympathetic activity and hypertension (49, 50). Moreover, parasympathetic activity is also altered, probably related to the presence of atherosclerotic plaque in large arteries and an increase of central stiffness impairing the baroreflex sensitivity (46). High levels of plasma renin activity, plasma angiotensin, angiotensin II and aldosterone are also associated with obesity (51–53). Renin, angiotensin II, angiotensinogen and angiotensin II receptors are found in AT suggesting that RAS is settled at adipocyte cells (54). RAS activation leads in turn to a salt-sensitive hypertension and vasoconstriction.
In this context, obesity-related hypertension treatment should be multidisciplinary. The treatment program should include an important lifestyle intervention that includes a low caloric diet with low intake of fat, increase of physical activity, reduced salt intake and pharmacological treatment (55). The first option of antihypertensive drugs in obese patients are angiotensin receptors blockers (ARB) and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) because both are associated with a lower incidence of diabetes (56), favorable effects on left ventricular hypertrophy and reduce risk of obese-related glomerulopathy.
Intersection Between Diabetes and Obesity: Diabesity
The term “diabesity” was first described in the 1970s to name the strong relationship that exists between these two entities, diabetes and obesity. Both of them, together with high blood pressure and dyslipidemia, constitute the cluster of conditions known as “metabolic syndrome,” which is associated with a higher CVD risk (57). In addition, both obesity and diabetes are increasing their prevalence worldwide (58), mainly explained by changes in lifestyle and by genetic susceptibility (2).
It is known that overweight and obesity increase the risk of type 2 diabetes (59, 60). This risk is proportional to body mass index increase and it is higher in the presence of abdominal fat. This abdominal fat is related to insulin resistance and has been identified as an independent risk factor for the development of type 2 diabetes in obese patients (61). In fact, the pathophysiology that connects obesity and diabetes is based on two main factors: insulin resistance and insulin deficiency (62) (Figure 2). In obese patients, circulatory levels of free fatty acids are increased, inhibiting glucose transport and promoting the use of lipids by the muscle, which causes insulin resistance. On the other hand, the decrease in glucose use by the muscle develops chronic hyperglycemia that perpetuates insulin resistance and in turn promotes increased insulin secretion. This hyperinsulinemia is also perpetuated due to the lipotoxicity of the liver cells derived from the accumulation of lipids in the liver and pancreatic β-cells rather than obesity itself (63). Thus, hyperinsulinemia and liver and pancreatic lipotoxicity promote an insulin deficit. Furthermore, obese patients present a systemic pro-inflammatory state that promotes insulin resistance leading to established diabetes along with insulin deficiency (64).
Figure 2. Connection between obesity and diabetes. Pathways involved in insulin resistance and insulin deficiency that lead to diabetes in obese patients. FFA, free fatty acids; TG, triglycerides.
Interestingly, there are certain abnormalities in metabolism that play a role in the development of diabetes and obesity. It has been shown that oxidative stress, inflammation and advanced glycation end-products can induce microvascular damage and a deficit in tissue perfusion (65). Epidemiological studies have found an association between short periods of sleep and increased diabetes or obesity. This lack of sleep has been linked to a decrease in leptin and an increase of hunger and intake of carbohydrates and food with high quantity of calories (66). It has been also demonstrated that hormones, namely testosterone, also play a role in diabesity. In men, an inverse relationship has been evidenced between testosterone concentration and visceral fat accumulation. In women, an increase in testosterone has been associated with glucose intolerance and insulin resistance (67). Vitamin D has been reported to inhibit fat accumulation, increase insulin secretion, preserve pancreatic β-cells, decrease insulin resistance and reduce appetite (68). Finally, the gut microbiota also contributes to the development of diabetes and obesity: a reduction in Bacteroidetes and an increase in Firmicutes has been associated with obesity (69).
In relation to DM, obesity and their common pathways it is important to mention sodium-glucose cotransporters (SGLT), that are widely distributed in the body, especially in the renal tubules, where glucose is reabsorbed. There are two subtypes of these cotransporters: SGLT-1 and SGLT-2. Most of the glucose is reabsorbed by the SGLT-2. In patients with DM there is an over expression of SGLT-2 in the hyperfiltration phase (70). Nowadays, exists a newly line of drugs to inhibit these SGLT2, increasing the excretion of glucose through the urine in these patients. Thus, the glycemic control improves with a reduction in glycosylated hemoglobin of 0.66%, weight loss of 1.8 kg and a decrease in systolic blood pressure of 4.45 mmHg compared to placebo (71). These benefits are promising in diabesity patients. In addition, beneficial results of said treatment have been shown in terms of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity and improvement in renal prognosis. One of the most frequently observed adverse effects is an increase in urinary tract infections and fungal genital infections derived from increased glycosuria (72).
Impact of Obesity Before and After Kidney Transplantation
Obesity is not considered to be a contraindication for kidney transplantation according to most clinical practice guidelines (73, 74). However, the reality is that many centers avoid transplanting obese patients (75), considering a BMI>35 Kg/m2 a relative contraindication to kidney transplantation (76). Once on the waiting list, obese patients experience longer waiting times and fewer chances to access to a transplant compared to non-obese patients (77, 78). In a large population-based study using the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) data on 132,353 patients on the waiting list, revealed that the probability of receiving kidney transplantation decreased with the increase of BMI. Furthermore, obese patients were more likely excluded when an allograft was available as the BMI increased (79). Importantly, evidence shows that kidney transplantation in obese patients offers better survival than remaining on dialysis. In a registry study using the United States Renal Data System (USRDS) data in which 7,443 obese patients were included, the mortality rate for those who received a kidney transplant was half of those who stayed on the waiting list (3.3 deaths vs. 6.6 deaths per 100 patients-year), and the mortality rate was even lower in the subgroup of patients who received a living donor transplant. However, this survival advantage was not achieved on patients with BMI ≥40 Kg/m2(80). In a more recent study using also the USRDS data that included 208.986 patients, a survival benefit was reported in all grades of obesity for both living and deceased donor kidney transplant recipients, although the benefit observed was lower in patients with BMI ≥ 40 Kg/m2 (78). In this study, better patient survival was also demonstrated in the subgroup of patients who received a kidney from an expanded criteria donor, and the only subgroup in which a survival benefit could not be demonstrated were Black patients with BMI ≥ 40 Kg/m2.
There are conflicting results regarding the association between patient and graft survival with obesity. While there are studies that have shown a negative impact of obesity on both patient and graft survival (81–85), others have found no association (86–89). In a systematic review and meta-analyses that included 138,081 kidney transplant recipients, obesity was associated with increased graft failure but no differences were found between obese and non-obese patients in terms of survival (90). A large registry study that included more than 50,000 patients, reported worse graft and patient outcomes in patients with very low and very high BMI (82). A recent systematic review that included data from more than 200,000 kidney transplant recipients found worse patient and graft survival at one, two and three years post-transplant in obese compared to non-obese patients (91). In contrast, the ANZDATA registry-based study (n = 5,864) did not show an independent association between obesity and patient or graft survival, although obese patients were more likely to experience delayed graft function (DGF) and acute rejection (AR) (92). Other single-center retrospective studies have not shown any impact on patient survival or graft loss when comparing outcomes between obese and non-obese patients (88, 93, 94). Interestingly, in a single-center retrospective study, patient and graft survival in obese patients was comparable to non-obese patients when those suffering from surgical wound complications were excluded from the analysis (95).
Delayed graft function is associated with recipient BMI in many retrospective studies (89, 91, 92, 96), and a UNOS registry-based study showed a significant gradual increase in the risk of DGF according to the obesity grade (83). The association between obesity and rejection is controversial. Some studies have shown an increased risk of rejection in this population (85, 87, 92, 94, 97), while others have not (86, 98–101). There is an intrinsic problem in obese patients regarding the difficulty on achieving and adequate exposure to immunosuppression, with frequent overexposure resulting into calcineurin-inhibitor toxicity, or otherwise, underexposure, placing these patients at a higher risk of rejection (99). Surgical interventions in obese patients are complex, technically more difficult and result in an increased risk of surgical complications (91, 95, 100, 102). Obese patients are more likely to have an increased risk for surgical wound infections, which have been reported to range from 20–30% in patients with BMI 30–40Kg/m2, and up to 40% in patients with BMI ≥ 40 Kg/m2 (95, 103). Reducing surgical complications becomes important if we consider that there is evidence showing that outcomes are similar between obese and non-obese patients in the absence of such complications (95).
Weight gain after transplantation is very common (81, 104), and a significant increase in weight after transplantation has been associated with decreased patient survival (81). Obesity has also been associated with an increased risk of cardiac events and congestive heart failure after transplantation (105), as well as with the development of diabetes mellitus (106, 107). Although there is conflicting data regarding the impact of obesity on kidney transplantation, it undoubtedly represents a risk factor for surgical complications, and it probably has a real impact on outcomes. Obese patients cannot be excluded from transplantation because of their BMI, since survival after transplantation is better than remaining on dialysis. Thus, management of these patients must include multidisciplinary strategies to lose weight, including the possibility of bariatric surgery in selected candidates as well as pharmacological treatments (85, 108).
Pharmacological Management of Obesity
The management of a patient with obesity must be holistic. Medical treatments are only a piece in a puzzle that includes physical activity, nutrition, behavioral therapy, pharmacological treatment, and, sometimes, bariatric surgery (109). Thus, anti-obesity pharmacological therapies should always be established together with nutritional and behavioral assessment and physical activity advice. Generally, anti-obesity drugs are prescribed by qualified clinicians in obesity units. However, some of them are commonly used in nephrological patients, since they are not obesity-exclusive treatments. Pharmacological management should be quickly considered in patients who do not lose weight with lifestyle modifications or are not able to maintain weight reductions.
At the time this article is written, four drugs have been approved for long-term (>12 weeks) obesity treatment by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA): orlistat, naltrexone extended-release (ER)/bupropion ER, phentermine/topiramate controlled-release (CR), and liraglutide (110). Phentermine/topiramate has not been approved for long-term use by the European Medicines Agency (110). Recommendations for starting anti-obesity drugs differ from U.S. and Asian guidelines: in the U.S. are recommended for patients with BMI ≥30 or ≥27 kg/m2 with comorbidities (diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, sleep apnea) (111) while in Asia are recommended with lower BMI (≥25 or ≥23 kg/m2) to patients who present at least one weight-related comorbidity (1).
Orlistat works as a gastrointestinal lipase inhibitor, avoiding fatty acids intestinal absorption and weight loss is about 5% (112, 113). Due to its mechanism of action, flatus is an important side effect, but orlistat has been also related to malabsorption, especially of fat-soluble vitamins. It has been associated with kidney stones and contraindications include malabsorption syndrome and cholestasis. Pancreatitis and liver disease are very rare. Data on patients with CKD are scarce. A study including 32 patients with CKD stages 3–5 showed significant weight loss and no serious adverse events in this population (75). Furthermore, Son JW et al. recommended that both orlistat and liraglutide can be carefully used in CKD patients with obesity (114).
Liraglutide is a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist that was firstly approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. It is 97% similar to human GLP-1 but it has a longer action time (115). It works by reducing appetite, delaying gastric emptying and balancing insulin and glucagon secretion time (115). At the highest dose of 3 mg per day, liraglutide has shown benefits in obese patients, with 5–10% body weight loss and an increased time of onset of diabetes in prediabetic obese patients (116). Liraglutide has also shown benefits in terms of glycemic control, blood pressure, lipid levels (116). The dose of 1.8 mg has been related to a decreased risk of death from cardiovascular disease, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and non-fatal cerebral infarction in diabetic patients (117). Main side effects are gastrointestinal: nausea and vomiting, constipation and diarrhea. Slowly increasing of dose could help to diminish them (117). Liraglutide has also been associated with pancreatitis and should not be used in patients with a previous history of pancreatitis (118). It also should not be used in patients with a personal or family history of medullar thyroid cancer or multiple endocrine neoplasia (119).
Bupropion is used for smoking cessation and depression. It inhibits appetite via the reward system and increases energy consumption. Naltrexone is an opioid antagonist that also inhibits food intake. Their combination has a synergistic effect (120). Weight reduction seems to depend on the dose: 6.1% for naltrexone/bupropion 32/360 mg and 5% for the 16/360 mg group according to the Contrave Obesity Research (COR)-I trial. The combination of both drugs has shown improvement in glycemic control, insulin resistance, and lipid profiles (121). The main side effect is nausea, which makes that some patients discontinue the treatment. Emotional or psychological disorders could appear in patients without psychiatric disease and the risk of suicidal ideation in young patients taking bupropion has been reported by FDA. Combination of naltrexone/bupropion could increase the risk of seizures, especially in patients with a previous history or with excessive alcohol intake or cocaine, as FDA notes. This drug should not be used in patients with end-stage CKD, since there are no studies in this population.
Combination of phentermine (sympathomimetic amine, anti-obesity drug) and topiramate (used to treat seizures and migraine headaches) drives weight reduction through increased satiety and energy waste, reducing caloric intake and taste abnormalities (122). Weight loss is about 5–10%. As well as other anti-obesity drugs, it has shown improvements in cardiovascular risk factors (123). A metanalysis recently published showed that phentermine/topiramate has the greatest weight loss effect among the currently available anti-obesity drugs (124). A pregnancy test must be performed before starting phentermine/topiramate since topiramate can cause birth defects. It also could cause depression, anxiety, sleep disorder, suicidal ideation, and difficulties in concentration. Topiramate has been related to inhibition of carbonic anhydrase activity and subsequently, metabolic acidosis, hypokalemia, renal stones, angle-closure glaucoma could be side effects. In patients with CKD this treatment should be avoided. Of note that this drug has not been approved for obesity treatment in Europe.
As Son JW et al. mentioned, the weight loss effect of these anti-obesity drugs can be ranked as follows: phentermine/topiramate CR > liraglutide 3.0 mg > naltrexone ER/bupropion ER > orlistat. New clinical trials are ongoing to study new anti-obesity drugs, such as sodium-glucose cotransporter two inhibitors, other GLP-1 receptor agonists, dopamine reuptake inhibitors or mineralocorticoid receptor agonists (114). Obesity therapies goal is to treat adipose tissue dysfunction, excessive body fat and diseases that are secondary to increased body fat and its adverse consequences, as renal impairment. It is worth mentioning that some drugs that are frequently used by nephrologists are also associated to body weight gain, such as insulin (125), glucocorticoids (126) and some β-blockers (atenolol, metoprolol) (127).
We reviewed the obesity-related kidney disease regarding the involved pathophysiologic mechanisms that include the hemodynamic, the adipose tissue-related and the insulin resistance—hyperinsulinemia pathways. Advances on the knowledge of the link between obesity, cardiovascular risk and diabetes in CKD patients including the crucial importance of obesity pre/post kidney transplantation are of great interest for the management of renal patients with obesity. The discussed studies provide insights on new frontiers regarding the fact that new pharmacological strategies are promising in a future for treating and management of obesity.
CG-C, AV, SB, MA, JS, and MS have conceptualized and written the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
The authors are current recipients of research grants from the Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria-Feder—Instituto de Salud Carlos III (PI17/00257) and REDinREN (RD16/0009/0030). MA was current recipient of research grant from Fundación Senefro, Sociedad Española de Nefrología 2019.
Conflict of Interest
AV reports non-financial support from Mundipharma, outside the submitted work. MS reports personal fees from NovoNordisk, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Fresenius, Mundipharma, Pfizer, Bayer and Vifor, grants and non-financial support from Boehringer, and non-financial support from Eli Lilly and Esteve outside of the submitted work. CG-C has received travel and congress fees support from Astra-Zeneca, Esteve, NovoNordisk, Boehringer-Ingelheim Lilly, Astellas, Otsuka, Novartis and Baxter. CG-C has given scientific lectures and participated in advisory boards organized by Astra-Zeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim Lilly, Mundipharma and NovoNordisk.
The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
AV performed this work within the basis of the Doctorate of Medicine of the Autonomous University of Barcelona (UAB).
1. Obesity: Preventing and Managing the Global Epidemic. Geneva: World Health Organization—Google Libros.
2. Wells JCK. The diabesity epidemic in the light of evolution: insights from the capacity–load model. Diabetologia. (2019) 62:1740–50. doi: 10.1007/s00125-019-4944-8
3. Kramer H, Luke A, Bidani A, Cao G, Cooper R, McGee D. Obesity and prevalent and incident CKD: the hypertension detection and follow-up program. Am J Kidney Dis. (2005) 46:587–94. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2005.06.007
4. Ferris M, Hogan SL, Chin H, Shoham DA, Gipson DS, Gibson K, et al. Obesity, albuminuria, and urinalysis findings in US young adults from the Add Health Wave III study. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. (2007) 2:1207–14. doi: 10.2215/CJN.00540107
5. Lakkis JI, Weir MR. Obesity and kidney disease. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. (2018) 61:157–67. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2018.07.005
6. Xu T, Sheng Z, Yao L. Obesity-related glomerulopathy: pathogenesis, pathologic, clinical characteristics and treatment. Front Med. (2017) 11:340–8. doi: 10.1007/s11684-017-0570-3
7. Zhang X, Lerman LO. Obesity and renovascular disease. Am J Physiol Ren Physiol. (2015) 309:F273–79. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00547.2014
8. Câmara NOS, Iseki K, Kramer H, Liu ZH, Sharma K. Kidney disease and obesity: epidemiology, mechanisms and treatment. Nat Rev Nephrol. (2017) 13:181–90. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2016.191
9. Hall JE, Brands MW, Dixon WN, Smith MJ. Obesity-induced hypertension: renal function and systemic hemodynamics. Hypertension. (1993) 22:292–9. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.22.3.292
10. Schütten MTJ, Houben AJHM, De Leeuw PW, Stehouwer CDA. The link between adipose tissue renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system signaling and obesity-associated hypertension. Physiology. (2017) 32:197–209. doi: 10.1152/physiol.00037.2016
11. Fujita T. Aldosterone in salt-sensitive hypertension and metabolic syndrome. J Mol Med. (2008) 86:729–34. doi: 10.1007/s00109-008-0343-1
12. Jose PA, Felder RA, Yang Z, Zeng C, Eisner GM. Gastrorenal axis. Hypertension. (2016) 67:1056–63. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.115.06424
13. Hall JE, do Carmo JM, da Silva AA, Wang Z, Hall ME. Obesity, kidney dysfunction and hypertension: mechanistic links. Nat Rev Nephrol. (2019) 15:367–85. doi: 10.1038/s41581-019-0145-4
14. Shek EW, Brands MW, Hall JE. Chronic leptin infusion increases arterial pressure. Hypertension. (1998) 31:409–14. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.31.1.409
15. Yamagishi SI, Edelstein D, Du XL, Kaneda Y, Guzmán M, Brownlee M. Leptin induces mitochondrial superoxide production and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 expression in aortic endothelial cells by increasing fatty acid oxidation via protein kinase A. J Biol Chem. (2001) 276:25096–100. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M007383200
16. Sharma K, RamachandraRao S, Qiu G, Usui HK, Zhu Y, Dunn SR, et al. Adiponectin regulates albuminuria and podocyte function in mice. J Clin Invest. (2008) 118:1645–56. doi: 10.1172/JCI32691
17. Hunley TE, Ma LJ, Kon V. Scope and mechanisms of obesity-related renal disease. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. (2010) 19:227–34. doi: 10.1097/MNH.0b013e3283374c09
18. Briones AM, Cat AND, Callera GE, Yogi A, Burger D, He Y. Adipocytes produce aldosterone through calcineurin-dependent signaling pathways: implications in diabetes mellitus-associated obesity and vascular dysfunction. Hypertension. (2012) 59:1069–78. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.190223
19. Coward R, Fornoni A. Insulin signaling: implications for podocyte biology in diabetic kidney disease. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. (2015) 24:104–10. doi: 10.1097/MNH.0000000000000078
20. Welsh GI, Hale LJ, Eremina V, Jeansson M, Maezawa Y, Lennon R, et al. Insulin signaling to the glomerular podocyte is critical for normal kidney function. Cell Metab. (2010) 12:329–40. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2010.08.015
21. Piwkowska A, Rogacka D, Kasztan M, Angielski S, Jankowski M. Insulin increases glomerular filtration barrier permeability through dimerization of protein kinase G type Iα subunits. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. (2013) 1832:791–804. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2013.02.011
22. Morrisey K, Evans RA, Wakefield L, Phillips AO. Translational regulation of renal proximal tubular epithelial cell transforming growth factor-β1 generation by insulin. Am J Pathol. (2001) 159:1905–15. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63037-4
23. Williams KJ, Tabas I. The response-to-retention hypothesis of atherogenesis reinforced. Curr Opin Lipidol. (1998) 9:471–4. doi: 10.1097/00041433-199810000-00012
24. Williams KJ, Tabas I. Lipoprotein retention- and clues for atheroma regression. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. (2005) 25:1536–40. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000174795.62387.d3
25. Eckel RH, Krauss RM. American Heart Association call to action: obesity as a major risk factor for coronary heart disease. Circulation. (1998) 97:2099–100. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.97.21.2099
26. Lavie CJ, Alpert MA, Arena R, Mehra MR, Milani RV, Ventura HO. Impact of obesity and the obesity paradox on prevalence and prognosis in heart failure. JACC Hear Fail. (2013) 1:93–102. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2013.01.006
27. Lavie CJ, McAuley PA, Church TS, Milani RV, Blair SN. Obesity and cardiovascular diseases: implications regarding fitness, fatness, and severity in the obesity paradox. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2014) 63:1345–54. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.01.022
28. McGill HC, McMahan CA, Malcom GT, Oalmann MC, Strong JP. Relation of glycohemoglobin and adiposity to atherosclerosis in youth. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. (1995) 15:431–40. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.15.4.431
29. Kurth T, Gaziano JM, Berger K, Kase CS, Rexrode KM, Cook NR, et al. Body mass index and the risk of stroke in men. Arch Intern Med. (2002) 162:2557–62. doi: 10.1001/archinte.162.22.2557
30. Atish S, Enchaiah K, Ane J, Vans CE, Evy AL, Ilson EWFW, et al. Obesity and the risk of heart failure abstract. NEngl J Med. (2002). 347:305–13. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa020245
31. Ho KKL, Pinsky JL, Kannel WB, Levy D. The epidemiology of heart failure: the Framingham Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. (1993) 22:6A−13A. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90455-A
32. Sjöström L, Narbro K, Sjöström CD, Karason K, Larsson B, Wedel H, et al. Effects of Bariatric Surgery on Mortality in Swedish Obese Subjects. N Engl J Med. (2007) 357:741–52. doi: 10.1056/nejmoa066254
33. Kushner RF, Calanna S, Davies M, Dicker D, Garvey WT, Goldman B, et al. Semaglutide 2.4 mg for the treatment of obesity: key elements of the STEP Trials 1 to 5. Obesity. (2020) 28:1050–61. doi: 10.1002/oby.22794
34. DeClercq V, Taylor C, Zahradka P. Adipose tissue: the link between obesity and cardiovascular disease. Cardiovasc Hematol Disord Targets. (2008) 8:228–37. doi: 10.2174/187152908785849080
35. Fernández-Sánchez A, Madrigal-Santillán E, Bautista M, Esquivel-Soto J, Morales-González Á, Esquivel-Chirino C, et al. Inflammation, oxidative stress, and obesity. Int J Mol Sci. (2011) 12:3117–32. doi: 10.3390/ijms12053117
36. Reilly SM, Saltiel AR. Adapting to obesity with adipose tissue inflammation. Nat Rev Endocrinol. (2017) 13:633–43. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2017.90
37. Bays HE, Toth PP, Kris-Etherton PM, Abate N, Aronne LJ, Brown WV, et al. Obesity, adiposity, and dyslipidemia: a consensus statement from the National Lipid Association. J Clin Lipidol. (2013) 7:304–83. doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2013.04.001
38. Berneis KK, Krauss RM. Metabolic origins and clinical significance of LDL heterogeneity. J Lipid Res. (2002) 43:1363–79. doi: 10.1194/jlr.R200004-JLR200
39. Björnson E, Adiels M, Taskinen MR, Borén J. Kinetics of plasma triglycerides in abdominal obesity. Curr Opin Lipidol. (2017) 28:11–8. doi: 10.1097/MOL.0000000000000375
40. Christou GA, Kiortsis DN. Adiponectin and lipoprotein metabolism. Obes Rev. (2013) 14:939–49. doi: 10.1111/obr.12064
41. Rashid S, Kastelein JJP. PCSK9 and resistin at the crossroads of the atherogenic dyslipidemia. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. (2013) 11:1567–77. doi: 10.1586/14779072.2013.839204
42. Yu YH, Ginsberg HN. Adipocyte signaling and lipid homeostasis: sequelae of insulin-resistant adipose tissue. Circ Res. (2005) 96:1042–52. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000165803.47776.38
43. Khovidhunkit W, Kim MS, Memon RA, Shigenaga JK, Moser AH, Feingold KR, et al. Effects of infection and inflammation on lipid and lipoprotein metabolism: mechanisms and consequences to the host. J Lipid Res. (2004) 45:1169–96. doi: 10.1194/jlr.R300019-JLR200
44. Lu B, Moser A, Shigenaga JK, Grunfeld C, Feingold KR. The acute phase response stimulates the expression of angiopoietin like protein 4. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. (2010) 391:1737–41. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.12.145
45. Feingold KR, Grunfeld C. Effect of inflammation on HDL structure and function. Curr Opin Lipidol. (2016) 27:521–30. doi: 10.1097/MOL.0000000000000333
46. Kotsis VT, Stabouli SV, Papamichael CM, Zakopoulos NA. Impact of obesity in intima media thickness of carotid arteries. Obesity. (2006) 14:1708–15. doi: 10.1038/oby.2006.196
47. Soltero EG, Solovey AN, Hebbel RP, Palzer EF, Ryder JR, Shaibi GQ, et al. Relationship of circulating endothelial cells with obesity and cardiometabolic risk factors in children and adolescents. J Am Heart Assoc. (2021) 10:e018092. doi: 10.1161/jaha.120.018092
48. Kotsis V, Stabouli S, Papakatsika S, Rizos Z, Parati G. Mechanisms of obesity-induced hypertension. Hypertens Res. (2010) 33:386–93. doi: 10.1038/hr.2010.9
49. Landsberg L, Krieger DR. Obesity, metabolism, and the sympathetic nervous system. Am J Hypertens. (1989) 2:125S–32S. doi: 10.1093/ajh/2.3.125S
50. Rocchini AP, Yang JQ, Gokee A. Hypertension and insulin resistance are not directly related in obese dogs. Hypertension. (2004) 43:1011–6. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000123073.48855.e9
51. Ruano M, Silvestre V, Domínguez Y, Castro R, García-Lescún MCG, Rodríguez A, et al. Morbid obesity, hypertensive disease and the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone axis. Obes Surg. (2005) 15:670–6. doi: 10.1381/0960892053923734
52. Kidambi S, Kotchen JM, Grim CE, Raff H, Mao J, Singh RJ, et al. Association of adrenal steroids with hypertension and the metabolic syndrome in blacks. Hypertension. (2007) 49:704–11. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000253258.36141.c7
53. Massiéra F, Bloch-Faure M, Ceiler D, Murakami K, Fukamizu A, Gasc JM, et al. Adipose angiotensinogen is involved in adipose tissue growth and blood pressure regulation. FASEB J. (2001) 15:2727–9. doi: 10.1096/fj.01-0457fje
54. Campbell DJ. Circulating and tissue angiotensin systems. J Clin Invest. (1987) 79:1–6. doi: 10.1172/JCI112768
55. Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, Rosei EA, Azizi M, Burnier M, et al. 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for themanagement of arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J. (2018) 39:3021–104. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy339
56. Mancia G, Grassi G, Zanchetti A. New-onset diabetes and antihypertensive drugs. J Hypertens. (2006) 24:3–10. doi: 10.1097/01.hjh.0000194119.42722.21
57. Farag YMK, Gaballa MR. Diabesity: an overview of a rising epidemic. Nephrol Dial Transplant. (2011) 26:28–35. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfq576
58. Lois K, Kumar S. Obesity and diabetes. Endocrinol y Nutr. (2009) 56:38–42. doi: 10.1016/S1575-0922(09)73516-8
59. Hart CL, Hole DJ, Lawlor DA, vey SG. How many cases of type 2 diabetes mellitus are due to being overwight in middle age? Evidence from the Midspan prospective cohort studies using mention of diabetes mellitus on hospital discharge or death records. Diabet Med. (2007) 24:73–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02016.x
60. Narayan KMV, Boyle JP, Thompson TJ, Gregg EW, Williamson DF. Effect of BMI on lifetime risk for diabetes in the U.S. Diabetes Care. (2007) 30:1562–6. doi: 10.2337/dc06-2544
61. Montague CT, O'Rahilly S. The perils of portliness: causes and consequences of visceral adiposity. Diabetes. (2000) 49:8838. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.49.6.883
62. Felber JP, Golay A. Pathways from obesity to diabetes. Int J Obes. (2002) 26:S39–45. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802126
63. Chavez JA, Summers SA. Lipid oversupply, selective insulin resistance, and lipotoxicity: molecular mechanisms. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Biol Lipids. (2010) 1801:252–65. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2009.09.015
64. Hotamisligil GS, Hotamisligil GS. Inflammation and endoplasmic reticulum stress in obesity and diabetes. Int J Obes. (2008) 32:S52–4. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2008.238
65. Savoia C, Schiffrin EL. Vascular inflammation in hypertension and diabetes: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic interventions. Clin Sci. (2007) 112:375–84. doi: 10.1042/CS20060247
66. Spiegel K, Tasali E, Penev P, Van Cauter E. Brief communication: sleep curtailment in healthy young men is associated with decreased leptin levels, elevated ghrelin levels, and increased hunger and appetite. Ann Intern Med. (2004) 141:846–50. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-11-200412070-00008
67. Page-Wilson G, Goulart AC, Rexrode KM. Interrelation between sex hormones and plasma sex hormone-binding globulin and hemoglobin A1c in healthy postmenopausal women. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. (2009) 7:249–54. doi: 10.1089/met.2008.0081
68. Candido FG BJ. Vitamin D, link between osteoporosis, obesity and diabetes? Int J Mol Sci. (2014) 15:6569–91. doi: 10.3390/ijms15046569
69. Moreno-Indias I, Cardona F, Tinahones FJ, Queipo-Ortuño MI. Impact of the gut microbiota on the development of obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Front Microbiol. (2014) 5:190. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00190
70. Pappachan JM, Fernandez CJ, Chacko EC. Diabesity and antidiabetic drugs. Mol Aspects Med. (2019) 66:3–12. doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2018.10.004
71. Yu B, Dong C, Hu Z, Liu B. Effects of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors on renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease. Medicine. (2021) 100:e24655. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024655
72. Wanner C, Inzucchi SE, Lachin JM, Fitchett D, von Eynatten M, Mattheus M, et al. Empagliflozin and Progression of Kidney Disease in Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. (2016) 375:323–34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1515920
73. Abramowicz D, Cochat P, Claas F, Dudley C, Harden P, Heeman U, et al. Guideline. Nephrol Dial Transplant. (2013) 28:ii1–ii71. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gft218
74. Chadban SJ, Ahn C, Axelrod DA, Foster BJ, Kasiske BL, Kher V, et al. KDIGO Clinical practice guideline on the evaluation and management of candidates for kidney transplantation. Transplantation. (2020) 104:S11–103. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003136
75. MacLaughlin HL, Cook SA, Kariyawasam D, Roseke M, van Niekerk M, Macdougall IC. Nonrandomized trial of weight loss with orlistat, nutrition education, diet, and exercise in obese patients With CKD: 2-year follow-up. Am J Kidney Dis. (2010) 55:69–76. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.09.011
76. Zrim S, Furlong T, Grace BS, Meade A. Body mass index and postoperative complications in kidney transplant recipients. Nephrology. (2012) 17:582–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1797.2012.01621.x
77. Lentine KL, Delos Santos R, Axelrod D, Schnitzler MA, Brennan DC, Tuttle-Newhall JE. Obesity and kidney transplant candidates: how big is too big for transplantation? Am J Nephrol. (2012) 36:575–86. doi: 10.1159/000345476
78. Gill JSJ, Hendren E, Dong J, Johnston O, Gill JSJ. Differential association of body mass index with access to kidney transplantation in men and women. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. (2014) 9:951–9. doi: 10.2215/CJN.08310813
79. Segev DL, Simpkins CE, Thompson RE, Locke JE, Warren DS, Montgomery RA. Obesity impacts access to kidney transplantation. J Am Soc Nephrol. (2008) 19:349–55. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2007050610
80. Glanton CW, Kao TC, Cruess D, Agodoa LYC, Abbott KC. Impact of renal transplantation on survival in end-stage renal disease patients with elevated body mass index. Kidney Int. (2003) 63:647–53. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00761.x
81. Hoogeveen EK, Aalten J, Rothman KJ, Roodnat JI, Mallat MJK, Borm G, et al. Effect of obesity on the outcome of kidney transplantation: a 20-year follow-up. Transplantation. (2011) 91:869–74. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3182100f3a
82. Meier-Kriesche HU, Arndorfer JA, Kaplan B. The impact of body mass index on renal transplant outcomes: a significant independent risk factor for graft failure and patient death. Transplantation. (2002) 73:70–4. doi: 10.1097/00007890-200201150-00013
83. Cannon RM, Jones CM, Hughes MG, Eng M, Marvin MR. The impact of recipient obesity on outcomes after renal transplantation. Ann Surg. (2013) 257:978–84. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318275a6cb
84. Yamamoto S, Hanley E, Hahn AB, Isenberg A, Singh TP, Cohen D, et al. The impact of obesity in renal transplantation: an analysis of paired cadaver kidneys. Clin Transplant. (2002) 16:252–6. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-0012.2002.01080.x
85. Sood A, Hakim DN, Hakim NS. Consequences of recipient obesity on postoperative outcomes in a renal transplant: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Exp Clin Transplant. (2016) 14:121–8. doi: 10.6002/ect.2015.0295
86. Gore JL, Pham PT, Danovitch GM, Wilkinson AH, Rosenthal JT, Lipshutz GS, et al. Obesity and outcome following renal transplantation. Am J Transplant. (2006) 6:357–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.01198.x
87. Marcén R, Fernández A, Pascual J, Teruel JL, Villafruela JJ, Rodriguez N, et al. High body mass index and posttransplant weight gain are not risk factors for kidney graft and patient outcome. Transplant Proc. (2007) 39:2205–7. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2007.07.072
88. Lentine KL, Rocca-Rey LA, Bacchi G, Wasi N, Schmitz L, Salvalaggio PR, et al. Obesity and cardiac risk after kidney transplantation: experience at one center and comprehensive literature review. Transplantation. (2008) 86:303–12. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31817ef0f9
89. Nicoletto BB, Fonseca NKO, Manfro RC, Gonçalves LFS, Leitão CB, Souza GC. Effects of obesity on kidney transplantation outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Transplantation. (2014) 98:167–76. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000028
90. Hill CJ, Courtney AE, Cardwell CR, Maxwell AP, Lucarelli G, Veroux M, et al. Recipient obesity and outcomes after kidney transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. (2015) 30:1403–11. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfv214
91. Lafranca JA, IJermans JNM, Betjes MGH, Dor FJMF. Body mass index and outcome in renal transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med. (2015) 13:111. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0340-5
92. Chang SH, Coates PTH, McDonald SP. Effects of body mass index at transplant on outcomes of kidney transplantation. Transplantation. (2007) 84:981–7. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000285290.77406.7b
93. Bardonnaud N, Pillot P, Lillaz J, Delorme G, Chabannes E, Bernardini S, et al. Outcomes of renal transplantation in obese recipients. Transplant Proc. (2012) 44:2787–91. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.09.031
94. Marks WH, Florence LS, Chapman PH, Precht AF, Perkinson DT. Morbid obesity is not a contraindication to kidney transplantation. Am J Surg. (2004) 187:635–8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.01.015
95. Lynch RJ, Ranney DN, Shijie C, Lee DS, Samala N, Englesbe MJ. Obesity, surgical site infection, and outcome following renal transplantation. Ann Surg. (2009) 250:1014–20. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b4ee9a
96. Weissenbacher A, Jara M, Ulmer H, Biebl M, Bösmüller C, Schneeberger S, et al. Recipient and donor body mass index as important risk factors for delayed kidney graft function. Transplantation. (2012) 93:524–9. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e318243c6e4
97. Papalia T, Greco R, Lofaro D, Maestripieri S, Mancuso D, Bonofiglio R. Impact of body mass index on graft loss in normal and overweight patients: retrospective analysis of 206 renal transplants. Clin Transplant. (2010) 24:E241–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2010.01258.x
98. Doshi MD, Garg N, Reese PP, Parikh CR. Recipient risk factors associated with delayed graft function: a paired kidney analysis. Transplantation. (2011) 91:666–71. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e318209f22b
99. Curran SP, Famure O, Li Y, Kim SJ. Increased recipient body mass index is associated with acute rejection and other adverse outcomes after kidney transplantation. Transplantation. (2014) 97:64–70. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3182a688a4
100. Johnson DW, Isbel NM, Brown AM, Kay TD, Franzen K, Hawley CM, et al. The effect of obesity on renal transplant outcomes. Transplantation. (2002) 74:675–81. doi: 10.1097/00007890-200209150-00015
101. Howard RJ, Thai VB, Patton PR, Hemming AW, Reed AI, Van Der Werf WJ, et al. Obesity does not portend a bad outcome for kidney transplant recipients. Transplantation. (2002) 73:53–5. doi: 10.1097/00007890-200201150-00009
102. Furriel F, Parada B, Campos L, Moreira P, Castelo D, Dias V, et al. Pretransplantation overweight and obesity: does it really affect kidney transplantation outcomes? Transplant Proc. 43:95–9. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.12.027
103. Humar A, Ramcharan T, Denny R, Gillingham KJ, Payne WD, Matas AJ. Are wound complications after a kidney transplant more common with modern immunosuppression? Transplantation. (2001) 72:1920–3. doi: 10.1097/00007890-200112270-00009
104. SH McDonald SP. Post-kidney transplant weight change as marker of poor survival outcomes. Transplantation. (2008) 85:1443–8. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31816f1cd3
105. Aziz F, Ramadorai A, Parajuli S, Garg N, Mohamed M, Mandelbrot DA, et al. Obesity: an Independent Predictor of Morbidity and Graft Loss after Kidney Transplantation. Am J Nephrol. (2020) 51:615–23. doi: 10.1159/000509105
106. Gusukuma LW, Harada KM, Baptista APM, Alencar MRP, De Sandes-Freitas TV, Tedesco-Silva H, et al. Outcomes in obese kidney transplant recipients. Transplant Proc. (2014) 46:3416–9. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2014.09.112
107. Dedinská I, Laca L, Miklušica J, Rosenberger J, Žilinská Z, Galajda P, et al. Waist circumference as an independent risk factor for NODAT. Ann Transplant. (2015) 20:154–9. doi: 10.12659/AOT.892067
108. Di Cocco P, Okoye O, Almario J, Benedetti E, Tzvetanov IG, Spaggiari M. Obesity in kidney transplantation. Transpl Int. (2020) 33:581–9. doi: 10.1111/tri.13547
109. Association AD. Obesity management for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: standards of medical care in diabetes−2020. Diabetes Care. (2020) 43:S89–97. doi: 10.2337/dc20-S008
110. Bray GA, Heisel WE, Afshin A, Jensen MD, Dietz WH, Long M, et al. The science of obesity management: an endocrine society scientific statement. Endocr Rev. (2018) 39:79–132. doi: 10.1210/er.2017-00253
111. Apovian CM, Aronne LJ, Bessesen DH, McDonnell ME, Murad MH, Pagotto U, et al. Pharmacological management of obesity: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2015) 100:342–62. doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-3415
112. Hvizdos KM, Markham A. Orlistat: a review of its use in the management of obesity. Drugs. (1999) 58:743–60. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199958040-00015
113. Torgerson JS, Hauptman J, Boldrin MN, Sjöström L. XENical in the prevention of diabetes in obese subjects (XENDOS) study: a randomized study of orlistat as an adjunct to lifestyle changes for the prevention of type 2 diabetes in obese patients. Diabetes Care. (2004) 27:155–61. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.1.155
114. Son JW, Kim S. Comprehensive review of current and upcoming anti-obesity drugs. Diabetes Metab J. (2020) 44:802–18. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2020.0258
115. Barrera JG, Sandoval DA, D'Alessio DA, Seeley RJ. GLP-1 and energy balance: an integrated model of short-term and long-term control. Nat Rev Endocrinol. (2011) 7:507–16. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2011.77
116. X P-S. Liraglutide in weight management. N Engl J Med. (2015) 373:1779–82. doi: 10.1056/nejmc1509759
117. Marso SP, Daniels GH, Brown-Frandsen K, Kristensen P, Mann JFE, Nauck MA, et al. Liraglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. Drug Ther Bull. (2016) 54:101. doi: 10.1056/nejmoa1603827
118. Monami M, Nreu B, Scatena A, Cresci B, Andreozzi F, Sesti G, et al. Safety issues with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (pancreatitis, pancreatic cancer and cholelithiasis): data from randomized controlled trials. Diabetes, Obes Metab. (2017) 19:1233–41. doi: 10.1111/dom.12926
119. Gallo M. Thyroid safety in patients treated with liraglutide. J Endocrinol Invest. (2013) 36:140–5. doi: 10.1007/BF03346749
120. Dutia R, Meece K, Dighe S, Kim AJ, Wardlaw SL. β-endorphin antagonizes the effects of α-MSH on food intake and body weight. Endocrinology. (2012) 153:4246–55. doi: 10.1210/en.2012-1166
121. Apovian CM, Aronne L, Rubino D, Still C, Wyatt H, Burns C, et al. A randomized, phase 3 trial of naltrexone SR/bupropion SR on weight and obesity-related risk factors (COR-II). Obesity. (2013) 21:935–43. doi: 10.1002/oby.20309
122. Pilitsi E, Farr OM, Polyzos SA, Perakakis N, Nolen-Doerr E, Papathanasiou AE, et al. Pharmacotherapy of obesity: available medications and drugs under investigation. Metabolism. (2019) 92:170–92. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2018.10.010
123. Allison DB, Gadde KM, Garvey WT, Peterson CA, Schwiers ML, Najarian T, et al. Controlled-release phentermine/topiramate in severely obese adults: a randomized controlled trial (EQUIP). Obesity. (2012) 20:330–42. doi: 10.1038/oby.2011.330
124. Khera R, Murad MH, Chandar AK, Dulai PS, Wang Z, Prokop LJ, et al. Association of pharmacological treatments for obesity withweight loss and adverse events a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. (2016) 315:2424–34. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.7602
125. Russell-Jones D, Khan R. Insulin-associated weight gain in diabetes -causes, effects and coping strategies. Diabetes, Obes Metab. (2007) 9:799–812. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2006.00686.x
126. Akalestou E, Genser L, Rutter GA. Glucocorticoid metabolism in obesity and following weight loss. Front Endocrinol. (2020) 11:59. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00059
127. Messerli FH, Bell DSH, Fonseca V, Katholi RE, McGill JB, Phillips RA, et al. Body weight changes with β-blocker use: results from GEMINI. Am J Med. (2007) 120:610–5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2006.10.017
Keywords: obesity, adiposity, chronic kidney disease, insulin resistance, kidney transplantation
Citation: García-Carro C, Vergara A, Bermejo S, Azancot MA, Sellarés J and Soler MJ (2021) A Nephrologist Perspective on Obesity: From Kidney Injury to Clinical Management. Front. Med. 8:655871. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.655871
Received: 19 January 2021; Accepted: 15 March 2021;
Published: 13 April 2021.
Edited by:Jose Luis Gorriz, University Clinical Hospital of Valencia, Spain
Reviewed by:Moshe Levi, Georgetown University, United States
Tarak Srivastava, Children's Mercy Hospital, United States
Copyright © 2021 García-Carro, Vergara, Bermejo, Azancot, Sellarés and Soler. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Clara García-Carro, email@example.com; Maria José Soler, firstname.lastname@example.org