Impact Factor 5.091 | CiteScore 4.1
More on impact ›

REVIEW article

Front. Med., 22 April 2021 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.658538

Axial Spondyloarthritis: Mimics and Pitfalls of Imaging Assessment

António Proença Caetano1, Vasco V. Mascarenhas2,3 and Pedro M. Machado4,5,6*
  • 1Radiology Department, Hospital de Curry Cabral, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal
  • 2Musculoskeletal Imaging Unit, Grupo Luz Saúde, Radiology Department, Imaging Center, Hospital da Luz, Lisbon, Portugal
  • 3EpiDoC Unit, Chronic Diseases Research Centre, NOVA Medical School, Lisbon, Portugal
  • 4Centre for Rheumatology & Department of Neuromuscular Diseases, University College London, London, United Kingdom
  • 5National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre, University College London Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
  • 6Department of Rheumatology, London North West University Healthcare National Health Service Trust, London, United Kingdom

Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a chronic inflammatory disorder that predominantly involves the axial skeleton. Imaging findings of axSpA can be divided into active changes, which include bone marrow edema, synovitis, enthesitis, capsulitis, and intra-articular effusion, and structural changes, which include erosions, sclerosis, bone fatty infiltration, fat deposition in an erosion cavity, and bone bridging or ankylosis. The ability to distinguish between imaging lesions suggestive of axSpA and artifacts or lesions suggestive of other disorders is critical for the accurate diagnosis of axSpA. Diagnosis may be challenging, particularly in early-stage disease and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays a key role in the detection of subtle or inflammatory changes. MRI also allows the detection of structural changes in the subchondral bone marrow that are not visible on conventional radiography and is of prognostic and monitoring value. However, bone structural changes are more accurately depicted using computed tomography. Conventional radiography, on the other hand, has limitations, but it is easily accessible and may provide insight on gross changes as well as rule out other pathological features of the axial skeleton. This review outlines the imaging evaluation of axSpA with a focus on imaging mimics and potential pitfalls when assessing the axial skeleton.

Introduction

Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is an umbrella term encompassing a group of chronic immune-mediated inflammatory diseases of the axial skeleton. This group includes patients with radiographic axSpA, with established sacroiliitis on radiographs, and a further subgroup called non-radiographic axSpA, who typically have evidence of sacroiliitis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the absence of definite radiographic changes.

Historically, the diagnosis of axSpA has often been delayed since radiographic abnormalities may take years to develop. Computed tomography (CT) allows for detection of smaller structural lesions in patients with chronic sacroiliitis that would otherwise be invisible on conventional radiography, thus aiding in the diagnostic work up of axSpA. In recent years, the introduction of MRI into clinical practice has facilitated earlier diagnosis of axSpA, and therefore earlier initiation of appropriate treatment. The Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) MRI working group has recently generated a consensus update on standardized definitions for MRI lesions in the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) of patients with axSpA (1). Multi-reader validation performed by the working group demonstrated substantial reliability for the most frequently detected lesions and comparable reliability between active and structural lesions. A similar exercise has been conducted for spine lesions and recently published in abstract format (2). The new consensus definitions for MRI lesions in the spine will replace a previous consensus manuscript by the same group (3).

Importantly, the full range and combination of active and structural lesions of the SIJ and spine should be taken into account when deciding if the MRI scan is suggestive of axSpA or not (i.e., contextual interpretation of active and structural lesions is key to enhancing diagnostic utility of MRI in patients with suspected axSpA), as imaging cannot be viewed in isolation and needs to be interpreted in the light of clinical presentation and results of laboratory investigations (4, 5).

MRI evaluation of the SIJ can be quite challenging even for experienced radiologists, due to several pitfalls. Being familiar with the main imaging findings and terminology of axSpA (Table 1) as well as knowing the topographic distribution of common and uncommon conditions involving the SIJ is key to establishing a confident diagnosis (Figures 1A,B).

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Imaging findings of active and chronic changes of the sacroiliac joint and spine in axial spondyloarthritis.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Imaging of the sacroiliac joint—Topographic distribution of main anatomical variants and pathological conditions that mimic axSpA, separated by quadrants of each articular surface (A) and orthogonal planes (B), namely coronal oblique (right upper image) and axial oblique (right lower image).

In this article, we will review common and uncommon pitfalls, congenital disorders, normal variants and pathological conditions that may mimic spondyloarthritis affecting the axial skeleton.

Anatomy of the Sacroiliac Joints and the Spine

The SIJ is the largest joint of the axial skeleton and consists of an amphiarthrosis, exhibits restricted mobility and is separated into a ligamentous (posterior) and synovial (anterior) component. The cartilage covering the synovial segment is thicker on the sacral side and, thus, less prone to lesions (6).

The SIJ is lined by a capsule. Several ligaments contribute to its stability and may be affected in axSpA, namely the anterior and posterior sacroiliac ligaments and interosseus ligament connecting the tuberosities of the sacrum and ilium deeply in the ligamentous portion. The intervertebral disc is also an amphiarthrosis and is comprised of an inner core—the nucleus pulposus—and an outer fibrous ring—the annulus fibrosus. There is also cartilage lining on the superior and inferior vertebral plates that protects the subchondral bone at this level. The inner core is generally spared in axSpA, but the annulus fibrosus attaches to the periphery of the vertebral plates where there is no cartilage protection, and interweaves with the anterior and posterior longitudinal ligaments of the spine, working as an enthesis.

Besides the annulus fibrosus, several ligaments stabilizing the spine are prone to inflammation at their insertion point, namely the anterior and posterior longitudinal, supraspinous, interspinous, intertransverse ligaments, and ligamentum flavum.

Normal Variants and Pitfalls

In this section we will describe potential anatomical variants and pitfalls of the SIJ and spine that may mimic axSpA findings (Table 2).

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Congenital disorders and normal variants of the sacroiliac joints and spine that mimic axial spondyloarthritis.

Coil Effect

Technical artifact responsible for artificial hyperintensity of structures near the receiver coils. These structures may be mistaken for bone marrow or soft tissue edema. Such findings, however, can be distinguished from true inflammatory changes due to their topographic distribution, which is predominantly peri-articular in the latter scenario.

Inadequate fat suppression is higher in patients with higher body mass index (BMI). Radial k-space sampling, an imaging reconstruction technique utilized in MRI data acquisition that is relatively insensitive to motion artifacts, seems to have a positive impact on image quality in such patients (7). Another solution might be to change saturation techniques, from a spectral pre-saturation of fat signal to a short tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequence, which homogeneously suppresses fat, with the caveat of reducing overall signal.

The type of coil also seems to have a significant impact on image quality, more so when combined with the correct sequence in reducing artifacts. This combination yields the best inter-observer agreement for bone marrow edema (BME) detection and lowest number of doubtful BME zones (8).

Phase-Encoded Motion Artifacts

Motion artifact may occur due to vessels, intestinal motion and patient motion. This artifact may cause blurring or a hyperintense image superimposed at or adjacent to the SIJ and mimic BME. Cross-reference between two perpendicular planes may allow avoidance of overcalling lesions (8, 9). Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood motion artifacts are also common in spine MR imaging (10).

Again, radial k-space sampling offers a higher signal-to-noise ratio and contributes to reduction in motion-related blurring. Application of motion-resistant sequences is also recommended (7). Other techniques may be employed, such as increasing the number of excitations, changing the phase-encoding axis (along the direction of CSF flow) or applying pre-saturation pulses outside the region of interest (11). Repetitive motion from breathing or cardiac motion may be reduced with gating techniques that perform data acquisition at specific intervals.

Blood Vessels

Blood vessels coursing close to the SIJ and spine along the acquisition plane may simulate bone marrow or soft tissue edema, synovitis or joint fluid on fluid-sensitive sequences. They present as linear hyperintensities along the acquisition plane and may ramify with other vessels on adjacent slices. CSF motion may also be an issue in spine imaging.

Intense vascularization may be seen at the transition between cartilaginous and ligamentous portion of the joint, at the ligamentous portion and adjacent to certain anatomical variants such as the iliosacral complex and the semi-circular sacral defect, which are described in more detail below (12). Vessels can also run along bones.

Normal Marrow Changes

Red marrow replacement occurs in a centrifugal fashion in individual bones and in a centripetal fashion in the skeleton. The extremities are primarily affected by this physiological aging phenomenon and, by the middle of the third decade (13), most of the bone marrow in long bones has an overall fatty marrow. Individually, conversion into fatty marrow starts in the diaphysis of long bones and progresses to the metaphysis, ultimately converting the distal epiphysis and, lastly, the proximal epiphysis. In the axial skeleton, the pattern of reconversion is less predictable and several patterns have been described in the spine (14). In the pelvis, small pockets of yellow marrow arise in the third decade in the acetabulum and anterior ilium. In the sacrum of male patients there is higher fat content in the lateral masses compared to females (15) and localized aggregates of fat marrow in the lumbar spines and lateral sacral ala are considered normal variants (16).

General Population and People With Chronic Non-specific Back Pain

Weber et al. showed that 25% of healthy individuals have signs suggestive of sacroiliitis on MRI (17). Similarly, Arnbak et al. found that, in 1,020 unselected individuals, 21% had sacroiliitis on MRI according to ASAS criteria.

Other authors (18) suggested that one fourth of asymptomatic individuals and more than half of women with post-partum back pain without axSpA had MRI positive sacroiliitis according to ASAS criteria. This study also showed that frequent runners have similar findings compared to asymptomatic individuals and that scoring high on a specific scoring system used for axSpA activity (Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada Scoring System for Sacroiliitis, SPARCC) is rare in healthy individuals and runners. Furthermore, deep lesions are specific for axSpA-related sacroiliitis and BME lesions in healthy individuals are preferentially located in the lower iliac bone.

Indeed, others studies have documented the presence of BME in healthy individuals without any symptoms of low back pain, which does not change in the setting of mechanical stresses or physical exercise (19) (Figures 2A,B). Recently, however, a large population study by Baraliakos et al. (20) confirmed a high prevalence of inflammatory and fatty changes in the SIJ and spine, which increases in frequency with age, suggesting a mechanical factor to their development.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. T1WI (A) and STIR image (B) of a military subject showing a small, peri-articular, area of bone edema (arrow) on the iliac side of the right sacroiliac joint. T1WI (C,E) and STIR (D,F) images of a post-partum female with bilateral foci of bone edema (arrows) adjacent to the sacroiliac joint.

Sports/Exercise Related BME

Evaluation of MRI lesions in athletes poses a significant challenge when attempting to discriminate healthy individuals from early axSpA. In fact, 30–35% of recreational runners and 41% of elite hockey skaters have shown ASAS criteria for axSpA when evaluated for sacroiliitis (17). Partial volume effect of vascular structures, mechanically triggered BME due to axial strain and normal anatomical variants are thought to be the main reasons for such findings. Applying a complementary semi-axial plane for evaluation seems to significantly reduce ASAS positivity to 20 and 18%, respectively for recreational runners and elite hockey skaters (8).

The two most common portions of the joint affected by BME are the anterior upper sacrum and the posterior lower ilium, the latter associated with partial volume effect of vessels and deep iliac ligament insertion. Unfortunately, it is well-recognized that the early incipient findings of inflammatory changes in axSpA patients show a topographic overlap with BME associated with constitutional features on the dorso-caudal portion of the SIJ, at the posterior lower ilium.

Low-grade BME lesions may indeed have several potential triggers such as mechanical overload or stress, anatomical variations, heavy load work, overweight and post-partum. Discriminative factors that may indicate possible or probable axSpA have not been determined—BME extension alone has not proven to be a relevant criterion (9), but evaluation of extent and topographical pattern might be able to reduce false-positive assessments of ASAS MRI positive sacroiliitis. Assessment of other structural features and active lesions may improve specificity (21, 22).

Post-partum

Low back pain is common during pregnancy and shortly after birth, typically resolving 6 weeks post-partum. Some patients, however, experience long-standing low back pain more than 6 months after childbirth (23).

Causes for post-partum symptoms are multifactorial and involve mechanical stress and hormonal changes, child and birth characteristics (24). Post-partum SIJ infection is an important differential diagnosis as it accounts for 15% of septic sacroiliitis events; auto-inflammatory conditions may also manifest during pregnancy or after childbirth.

Agten et al. (25) compared the SIJ of post-partum women and women with known axSpA and found no distinguishable features based on extent and distribution, making it difficult to avoid overcalling axSpA in such patients (Figures 2C–F). Presence of structural changes, however, was more frequent in the axSpA group and only rarely found in the post-partum group. Furthermore, pain referral and pain intensity were not correlated with BME in the post-partum group. Importantly, puerperal diastasis of the pubic symphysis and SIJ is physiological to some degree and only in rare situations is associated with complications (26).

Nonetheless, Winter et al. showed positive findings on MRI of post-partum women with back pain, which was consistent with previous data that reported 60% of such patients having SIJ BME lesions on MRI (18, 27).

Schmorl Nodes

Schmorl nodes correspond to herniation of nucleus material through the endplate of the vertebral bodies into the subchondral bone (28).

Schmorl nodes are usually marginated by a well-defined sclerotic border which may be irregular and are more prevalent in the lower thoracic and upper lumbar segments. The etiology of Schmorl nodes is multifactorial, involving trauma and congenital causes. There is also an association with smoking habits, vertebral body length, and age (28). Patients with Schmorl nodes may be asymptomatic or present with low back pain, and an association with degenerative spine disease and disc degeneration has been established (29). If Schmorl nodes become symptomatic, MRI may demonstrate inflammation and edema in the bone marrow surrounding the Schmorl node. Vertebroplasty has been tried out and proven to be effective and safe when symptoms do not resolve with medical or physical therapy (30, 31).

Acute Schmorl nodes may mimic other inflammatory conditions affecting the spine. Imaging features are of a concentric ring-type edema and involvement of the adjacent end-plate to the herniated node, without diffuse signal abnormalities (32).

Block Vertebrae

Block vertebrae may be congenital or acquired. Congenital blocked vertebra is generally found in the cervical spine and associated with Klippel-Feil syndrome (short neck, low hair line, and neck movement restriction). Other abnormalities associated with congenital block vertebra include syringomyelia, diastematomyelia, or tethered cord (33).

Acquired vertebral fusion may be a desired surgical outcome in cases of advanced degenerative disc disease or cases of joint instability (34, 35). Also, late-onset ankylosing spondylitis with extensive calcification may lead to bamboo spine due to dystrophic and ligament calcifications so extensive that they merge both endplates of the disc joint. Interbody fusion requires disc removal through a posterior or anterior approach, insertion of a bone graft and/or fusion hardware. The purpose is to achieve an arthrodesis along the disc space. Complications include pseudarthrosis, when bone bridging does not develop or is insufficient. Studies to evaluate post-operative fusion include CT, MRI and bone scintigraphy.

SIJ Anatomical Variants

Synovial recesses, bony and cartilage clefts that may mimic bone erosion, intense vascularization on the ligamentous portion that enhances avidly and fat infiltration of the sacral bone marrow without pathological significance may be evident on SIJ imaging and are addressed in other sections of this article.

In this section we briefly describe the seven anatomical variants of the SIJ that have been documented to date. The morphology of the sacral and iliac surfaces is well-depicted on CT. The most frequent variants are accessory SIJ and iliosacral complex (Figures 3A,B). These variants are sometimes associated with edematous or structural changes suspected to be mechanical in nature. Positive association between anatomical variations and degenerative changes is somewhat controversial (36, 37). To the best of the authors' knowledge, only one study has analyzed MRI changes in morphological variants of the SIJ (38).

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Normal variants and incidental findings of the sacroiliac joint (arrows). CT reconstructions with oblique orientation depict bilateral iliosacral complexes (A), the most common sacroiliac joint variant; right accessory sacroiliac joint (B); bilateral bipartite iliac bony plate (C); left iliac bone pneumatocyst (D). A patient with an incidental finding on the right sacroiliac joint seen on pelvic radiography performed MRI, which revealed an iliac bone cleft filled with fluid (E,F). Note the sclerosis of the symphysis pubis (E), compatible with osteitis pubis.

Accessory Sacroiliac Joints

The most common variant is an accessory sacroiliac joint (3.6–50%), which is more common in females and has a positive association with increased BMI (38, 39). Accessory SIJ is detected between the iliac and sacral articular surfaces in the posterior aspect of the joint.

It is however not certain if the accessory SIJ are congenital or acquired. In fact, degenerative ankylosis and overall structural changes may masquerade accessory SIJ.

This variation is best depicted on axial slices and is located at the level of the first or second sacral foramen. Signal intensity changes are depicted in a proportion of patients, mostly related to sclerotic or fatty changes, but rarely edematous.

Iliosacral Complex

The iliosacral complex corresponds to a marked prominence of the ilium opposite a concave depression of the posterolateral sacrum (40). An iliosacral complex is present in 4% (5.8–11.7%) of individuals and is the second most common anatomical variant and seen bilaterally with slightly increased frequency in women (38). The iliosacral complex is mostly found at the level of the S1 foramen and corresponds to a marked prominence of the ilium projecting to a concavity of the lateral sacrum, in an extra-articular portion of the SIJ (39). This variant is best depicted on coronal images and mainly located between the first and second sacral foramen. Half of cases show prominent vascular structures adjacent to the complex, which may mimic enthesitis.

The interpretation of the SIJ and, specifically, the joint space width, should take into account these variations and the presence of significant extra-articular portions of the ilium and sacrum at different levels. The sacroiliac ligaments insert in such depressions and cavities at the posterior-inferior ilium.

SIJ degeneration is more prevalent in patients with iliosacral complex compared to other morphological variations (36).

Other Anatomical Variants

The ossification centers of the sacral wings may be persistent in adulthood. They are located at the posterior-superior border of the SIJ, involve the cartilaginous portion of the joint and have a triangular shape.

Paraglenoid sulci are small bilateral grooves located in the inferior ilium lateral to the SIJ, more prevalent in women.

Visible at the level of the S2 foramen, semicircular defects in the articular surface are represented by an indentation of the ilium toward a mild depression of the sacrum (40). This variant has been described elsewhere as a round defect of the sacrum with or without an opposing iliac defect in the axial plane. It involves the posterior-superior aspect of the ligamentous portion of the joint, is more common in females and mostly bilateral (38).

Bipartite iliac bony plate is more frequently unilateral and seen in women, at the posterior-inferior portion of the joint. Crescent-like iliac bony plates have also been described and are seen in 2–5% of patients (36, 39) (Figure 3C).

An isolated synostosis has been rarely depicted in two previous studies, in the mid third of the SIJ at the level of the first sacral foramen (38, 41). Absence of structural or inflammatory changes in the remaining SIJ and contralateral side should raise suspicion for an anatomical variation.

Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebrae and Bertolotti Syndrome

Lumbosacral transitional vertebra (LSTV) refers to a spectrum of congenital anomalies of the last lumbar and first sacral vertebrae, where an elongated transverse process of the lumbar vertebra articulates or fuses with the first sacral segment (42) (Figure 4). The overall incidence ranges from 4 to 35.6% (43, 44).

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Bilateral transitional vertebra (sacralization of L5), with neo-articulation of both hypertrophic transverse apophyses with the sacrum (arrows).

Partial articulation and fusion between L5 and S1 lead to limited motion at the lumbosacral joint. This raises mechanical stress to the level above and results in accelerated degeneration of the L4–L5 joint.

The Castellvi classification of LSTV divides in four types (45): (Ia) unilateral, (Ib) dysplastic transverse process with a height >19 mm, (II) incomplete unilateral (a) or bilateral (b) lumbarization/sacralization with engorged transverse process articulating with the sacrum, (III) unilateral (a) or bilateral (b) complete osseous fusion of the engorged transverse processes to the sacrum, (IV) unilateral type II transition with contralateral type III. The most common types in patients with low back pain are IV, IIIb, and II (43). Another study also concluded that LSTV types II and IV positively correlate with prevalence and severity of low back pain (46).

Association between LSVT and low back pain has been termed Bertolotti syndrome, in honor of Dr. Bertolotti who first described the morphological abnormalities, and is an important etiology of low back pain in young patients. LSVT may cause radicular changes and MRI is the examination of choice to evaluate the intervertebral disc as well as the neural foramina (45, 47). An association between LSTV and disc herniation has also been found (4851).

Spina bifida occulta

Spina bifida occulta (SBO) and LSVT are the most common congenital lumbosacral deformities and involve the 5th lumbar segment (52). SBO is a result of failed fusion of the posterior vertebral elements without affecting the spinal cord or meninges. Its prevalence is estimated between 0.6 and 25% (49).

While SBO occurring in the most frequent segment (L5) does not seem to have any correlation with disc herniation, a previous study has reported an association between SBO of the S1 segment and posterior disc herniation (49). In both pediatric and adult patients, there is a positive correlation of SBO with spondylolysis (53). SBO at other levels is rare (54).

Intra-Osseous Pneumatocyst and Synovial Cyst

Simple bone pneumatization cysts of the pelvic bones are a common, but poorly understood, innocuous findings on CT (Figure 3D). There have been occasional reports in the literature (5557) and imaging features include well-circumscribed air-filled round defects of bone with a thin sclerotic rim, usually found adjacent to the SIJ on the iliac bone. They may be an unusual cause of pain that is indistinguishable from other causes of low back pain. In the spine, there are also scarce publications indicating the presence of vertebral pneumatocysts, especially in the lumbar or cervical spine (58).

Synovial cysts, on the other hand, are fluid-filled para-articular lesions that may, but not always, communicate with the joint. These lesions have been described in the SIJ and in the spine, although they are exceedingly rare near the SIJ joint (59, 60) (Figures 3E,F). In the spine, they are most commonly originated from the zygapophyseal joints, in association with degenerative disease.

Meningeal and Perineural (Tarlov) Cysts

Meningeal cysts may be apparent on pelvic or spinal MRI. These lesions are of unknown origin, and include perineural or Tarlov cysts and arachnoid cysts.

Tarlov cysts, also termed perineural cysts, are common incidental findings on pelvic CT or MRI. They correspond to meningeal dilations of the nerve sheath filled with liquor at the junction of the dorsal ganglion and spinal posterior nerve root at the level of the sacrum. They are typically bilateral, small and asymptomatic and are more common in females at an average age of 40 years (61). Tarlov cysts are visualized on 1–2% of sacral MRIs and 25% are believed to cause symptoms such as low back pain, perineal or lumbar pain, sciatica and rarely, cauda equina syndrome (62).

When large, Tarlov cysts may exhibit adjacent bone erosion or endopelvic extension. Enhancement of the cyst should prompt a different diagnosis, such as schwannoma or neurofibroma (63).

Tarlov cysts have originally been described in the sacrum, but they can be found anywhere in the spine (64). Cervical cysts have been increasingly described with MRI. Differential diagnosis includes facet joint cysts and nerve sheath tumors.

Arachnoid cysts arise from the arachnoid membrane through a congenital weakness toward the epidural space. Contrary to Tarlov cysts, the walls or cavities do not contain nerves. They may enlarge and widen the medullary canal or foramina, and cause localized or referred pain (65).

Meningoceles, while not truly cysts, may be confounded with the previous conditions. They constitute protrusions of membrane-lined spinal canal contents through a defect in the column (66). Depending on the herniated content, they may be named myeloceles, myelomeningoceles, or lipomyelomeningoceles. Posterior sacral meningoceles are associated with tethered cord syndrome.

Pathological Conditions

In this section we will describe several pathological conditions that may mimic axSpA findings (Table 3).

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Pathological conditions that mimic axial spondyloarthritis.

Degenerative Changes

Sacroiliac Joint

Subchondral BME occurs in early phases of degenerative processes resulting from vascularization of fibrous tissue. It is important to notice the site of edema, since hyperintensity on synovial portions of the SIJ favors inflammatory disease, while ligamentous portion involvement favors degenerative disease.

Degenerative changes are more common in men than women and involve osteophyte formation and ankylosis (Figure 5A). A clear connection between CT findings of SIJ degeneration and symptoms has not been found.

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. CT axial slice showing degenerative changes of the sacroiliac joint (A), with marginal osteophytes and bone sclerosis. Modic endplate changes at the weight bearing surfaces of the distal lumbar spine (arrows), seen on coronal T1 (B) and sagittal fluid-sensitive (C) sequences. Bone marrow signal changes are high on T1WI and fat-saturated T2WI, compatible with Modic type 2.

SIJ degeneration is common in early decades of life and increases with age. There is a high prevalence of asymptomatic patients with degenerative changes, so caution is recommended when attributing low back pain to SIJ degenerative disease.

SIJ space narrowing is only present in about 25% of patients with degenerative changes. Bone sclerosis is the most common finding, usually at the anterior and middle thirds of the joint and commonly associated with pubic symphysis degeneration.

Spine

Degenerative disease of the spine may be confounded with acute or chronic inflammatory changes due to axSpA (67, 68). Progression of intervertebral disc degeneration follows an MRI classification (Modic) that compounds three stages analogous to the Andersson lesions seen in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) (69). Other structures of the spine are usually affected, such as the atlanto-occipital joints, atlanto-odontoid joint, facet joints and the ligamentum flavum (70).

The main differences of Modic lesions compared to inflammatory lesions is their topographic location (along the main weight-bearing axis), clinical context (old age and associated with other degenerative findings) and lab work (Figures 5B,C). A multidimensional approach usually suffices to establish the correct diagnosis.

Scheuermann Disease

Also termed juvenile kyphosis, Scheuermann disease (SD) is the most common cause of symptomatic structural thoraco-lumbar hyperkyphosis in adolescents (13–16 years-old) (71). Its etiology is unknown but several theories have been proposed, such as impaired collagen fibril formation due to changes in growth hormone levels with consequent weakening of the vertebral endplates (72). A strong genetic background has also been reported in recent studies (72). Radiological criteria for establishing SD is not consistent in the literature—some authors describe anterior wedging >5° in at least three adjacent vertebral bodies; others include wedging in one or two vertebral bodies, changes in vertebral endplate, narrowed disc space and anterior Schmorl nodules. An atypical form has been described by Heithoff et al. (73) in the presence of three of the following findings–narrowed disc space, disc dehydration, endplate irregularity, anterior vertebral body edge wedging and Schmorl nodules.

Degenerative disease of the spine is typically present in young patients with SD, namely spondylosis, spondylolisthesis, endplate irregularity and narrowed disc space (with or without associated disc herniation).

Osteitis condensans ilii

Osteitis condensans ilii (OCI) is typically seen in middle-aged women in whom it manifests as sclerotic areas, mainly in the iliac bone, with relatively normal joint spaces, occurring symmetrically and bilaterally at the ventral-caudal portion of the SIJ (74). Its cause is largely unknown but the most accepted hypothesis is that of a mechanical stress, given that such condition is more commonly observed in patients who have given birth, albeit not exclusive.

Radiographs may demonstrate bilateral triangular sclerosis of the iliac wing surface at the SIJ, but osteitis can be unilateral. Osteitis condensans ilii is usually asymptomatic, but may present as non-inflammatory chronic back or hip pain.

Differential diagnosis with inflammatory conditions is possible due to lack of erosions, joint space narrowing, ligament calcifications or bone bridging. Sclerosis is present in both groups, but is more pominent in OCI patients. Nonetheless, it has been shown that this condition demonstrates BME on MRI in a significant portion of patients (75), which ranges from mild to as high as vessel signal intensity. BME from OCI is seen in a continuous distribution pattern centered in the ventral-cartilaginous joint part of the ilium and spreads beneath the arcuate line, while BME from axSpA may be scattered and preferentially located at the dorsal-cartilaginous part of the joint and rarely spreads to the marrow beneath the arcuate line (Figures 6A–F).

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6. Fifty seven-year-old female patient with bilateral osteitis condensans ilii evident on pelvis radiography (A) and CT (B). Another patient, with post-partum bilateral bone marrow edema of the sacroiliac joint and sclerotic changes compatible with osteitis condensans ilii (arrows, asterisks), shown on MRI sequences (C–E) and CT (F).

Some axSpA specific parameters are also present in OCI patients, such as HLA-B27 positivity, inflammatory back pain, and peripheral and extra-articular manifestations, albeit in a smaller proportion of patients (76, 77). Erosions are almost exclusively seen in axSpA patients, especially when multiple.

Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostosis and Posterior Longitudinal Ligament Calcification

Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) is characterized by undulating or flowing ossifications along the anterior column of the vertebrae, but also affecting ligaments, tendons, joint capsule, and periosteum, with relative preservation of the disc spaces and absence of radiographic changes associated with degenerative disease (78). It affects older, obese and diabetic patients with increased incidence and may involve any segment of the vertebral column, with affinity to the thoracic and lumbar segments (79) (Figure 7A). Preferential involvement of the superior non-cartilaginous portion of the SIJ is seen, with occasional bridging. There is no sacroiliitis or facet ankylosis. Bone mineral density of the affected segments is also maintained (80, 81).

FIGURE 7
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 7. Lateral cervical radiography of a patient with cervical undulating anterior longitudinal ligament ossification (arrows), compatible with DISH (A). Another patient (B) with cervical DISH and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament; differential diagnosis with posterior syndesmophytes is not always straightforward, as seen in a CT sagittal reconstruction of a patient with ankylosing spondylitis [(C), arrow].

Radiographs are generally sufficient to make the diagnosis. Other structures beside the axial skeleton might be involved and support the diagnosis, such as the iliac crest, ischial tuberosities, femoral trochanters and the non-articular portion of the patella, with decreasing order of frequency (82). In such places, extensive wavy calcifications are found where ligaments, tendons and capsules attach to bone.

CT and MRI are reserved for whenever there is suspicion of complications, such as dysphagia, nerve compression or fracture (83). Special care should be taken to assess for fractures, which may occur with minor trauma and have a characteristic “carrot stick” appearance that can compress the spinal cord (84, 85).

DISH may be seen in association with posterior longitudinal ligament ossification (OPLL). In fact, both conditions are frequently seen together in nearly half of patients. OPLL predominantly affects the cervical spine and has a more sinister course as it is adjacent to the spinal canal (Figure 7B). It may, however, be difficult to differentiate from a posterior syndesmophyte, as shown in Figure 7C in a patient with ankylosing spondylitis.

Trauma

Insufficiency Fractures and Stress Reaction

There are mainly two types of sacral fractures—insufficiency and fatigue fractures. Insufficiency fractures are more common and occur with minimal trauma in an osteoporotic bone, are frequently bilateral and have a higher incidence in women (86, 87) (Figure 8).

FIGURE 8
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 8. CT (left), T1WI (middle), and fat-saturated PD (right) MRI of a patient with sacral insufficiency fractures (arrows). T1WI shows diffuse slightly hypointense signal of the left sacral wing and a linear hypointensity compatible with a sacral fracture; corresponding fat-saturated PD image documents marked bone marrow edema.

Sacral stress (or fatigue) fractures are seen in athletes and frequent runners. A stress reaction or fracture may be documented by MRI as a unilateral, sacral side BME without involvement of the subchondral bone. A vertical fracture line within the affected sacrum may be seen and raise suspicion for the diagnosis.

Sacral insufficiency fractures are common (1–1.8%, as high as 5% in some series) and underdiagnosed as a source of low back pain (88). Likewise, vertebral osteoporotic fractures constitute a significant cause of low back pain and disability.

Etiologies include a weakened bone (osteoporosis, steroid-induced osteopenia, infiltrative disease), SIJ pathology (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis) with energy transfer to the sacrum, post-menopause and pelvic radiation. Paget disease, hyperparathyroidism and post-partum sacral fractures have also been reported. Interestingly, 1.6% of regular runners have sacral injuries (89). Mean age of presentation is 70–75 years.

Radiographs are usually unremarkable (20–38% sensitivity, 12.5% with visible fracture line), but when present, fractures are more often seen in the sacral ala (88). Some articles report a sensitivity approaching 0% (90). MRI is the examination of choice given its higher sensitivity, and shows BME.

Fractures involving the spine are more common in the pedicles and pars interarticularis, the latter ultimately leading to spondylolysis. Spondylolysis is one of the most common causes of low back pain in young athletes and may be present in up to 47% of symptomatic patients from this group (91).

A radiographic sign of spondylolysis is lateral deviation of the spinous process of the affected level, due to rotation toward the shorter laminae. Radiographs are, nonetheless, limited in documenting this condition and are most useful at depicting spondylolisthesis, which may be another sign of accompanying spondylolysis. CT is the gold standard for detailing bone morphology and detecting pars defects. MRI has a good correlation with CT and SPECT imaging (87). An MRI grading for spondylolysis characterization has been developed (92).

Pedicle stress fractures are also commonly seen among athletes, but may arise as a complication of laminectomy, scoliosis interventions and spine fusion (93, 94). Prevalence in the population is unknown and pathophysiology is controversial. Radiographs may show sclerosis of the pedicles, but other imaging methods are more sensitive, such as MRI or SPECT (91).

Post-traumatic Inflammatory-Like Arthritis

Inflammatory-like structural changes of the SIJ have been described in patients after major pelvic trauma, namely fracture or diastasis (95). Clinical symptoms may be of inflammatory or mechanical nature. It is uncertain whether these findings support the theory that axSpA may be triggered through traumatic events or are short-term and self-limited events. Backfill (fat deposition in an erosion cavity), a specific sign of axSpA seen on MRI, has been documented in post-traumatic SIJ diastasis, but may represent a physiological event of bone remodeling in unstable SIJ (95).

SIJ trauma with intra-articular step-off has not been linked to inflammatory-like structural changes.

Sacroiliac Joint Laxity and Diastasis

The SIJ space shows important variations depending on the location where it is measured. A joint space under 2 mm is considered pathologically reduced (frequently due to degeneration) (96, 97). However, a detailed anatomy of the SIJ is relevant to avoid erroneous measurements. It is important to take into account that anatomical variants, which are not infrequent, have an impact on SIJ width measurements.

AxSpA affecting the SIJ may produce joint space widening (so-called pseudo-widening) due to cartilage or bone erosions, as well as joint-space narrowing, due to bone remodeling, bridging, and ankylosis. Other conditions described in this article may produce similar findings in the same manner (e.g., erosions in hyperparathyroidism) or in a different fashion (e.g., cartilage wear in degenerative changes). Furthermore, knowledge of patient history is essential; history of trauma to the pelvic ring might cause SIJ diastasis, especially in open-book fractures where the anterior ligaments are torn (98). In these cases, asymmetric widening, evidence of a posterior offset and absence of other findings hint at the probable diagnosis (39, 97).

Sacroiliac joint laxity and hypermobility has been described and may lead to joint instability, disturbance of mechanical loading and development of symptoms.

Septic Arthritis and Spine Infections

SIJ infections arise most often from blood-borne pathogens; erosions of the SIJ may be seen associated with osteomyelitis or soft-tissue abscess (99) (Figures 9A–D). Bacterial forms of SIJ infection may occur through different routes, namely hematogenous, contiguous spread, direct inoculation, or post-surgical. Joint aspiration is often necessary for diagnosis, but clinical and laboratory investigations, aided by CT and MRI showing suggestive findings (see below) may suffice in the presence of a suggestive clinical context. Juxta-articular bone demineralization, considered the earliest finding of infectious sacroiliitis, can be seen on CT. Soft tissue involvement and unilaterality also help in diagnosis (100).

FIGURE 9
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 9. Fat-saturated PD (A) and T1WI (B) coronal slices, fat-saturated PD (C) axial and CT axial slices (D) of a 12-year-old female patient with proven Streptococcus spp. osteomyelitis of the right sacrum (arrow). A lytic lesion is seen adjacent to the right sacroiliac joint. Lateral lumbar radiography (E), post-contrast fat-saturated T1WI (F) and TIRM (G) sagittal slices of a 26-year-old female patient with confirmed tuberculous spondylodiscitis of L3–L4 segment (arrow).

In specific subsets of patients, certain agents might be suspected. Drug addicts are susceptible to infection caused by rare organisms, such as Klebisella, Enterobacter, Streptococcus, Candida albicans, and Pseudomonas spp.

Facet joint infection is an increasingly recognized entity arising from non-hematogenous sources such as respiratory or genitourinary infections and interventional procedures. Clinical symptoms are similar to spondylodiscitis but generally unilateral erosive bone changes, thickening of the ligamentum flavum and obliteration of fat planes may be inconspicuous on CT and only detected on MRI.

Spine infection should be suspected in the clinical setting of new or worsening back pain and fever, intravenous access or hemodialysis, recent bacteremia, endocarditis, intravenous drug abuse or new neurologic deficits (100, 101). It starts as an endplate infection which progresses to discitis. Subtle endplate edema may be the very earliest signs of spondylodiscitis (102). Edema or fluid in the psoas musculature, termed MRI psoas sign, is another finding consistent with early spondylodiscitis (103).

Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis

Pyogenic spondylodiscitis is typically centered at the disc space, but may manifest in the bony spinal column and ligaments of the extradural spine. Hematogenous spread is the main route of infection, through arterial supply or paravertebral venous plexus (104). The most common causative agent is Staphylococcus aureus (105). Disease has a higher incidence in diabetic and male patients and has an anatomical predilection for the lumbar spine.

In adults, infection spreads from the anterior vertebral body to the remaining body, endplates and adjacent discs. Spread to the paraspinal soft-tissues is common. Documentation of spinal abscesses is particularly relevant as it constitutes an emergency (106). Pediatric patients still have a robust arterial anastomotic network which protects the bone, but the disc is more vulnerable and highly vascularized, thus making it the primary site of infection.

Pyogenic spondylodiscitis reduces disc height and shows hyperintensity on fluid-sensitive sequences that is distinct from the normal hydrated disc pattern. The disc also enhances after gadolinium administration. Bone surface irregularity, destruction and enhancement of the endplates and vertebral bodies is also typical. Extension to the epidural and paravertebral spaces with development of inflammatory swelling, phlegmon, or abscesses is possible (107).

Hyperparathyroidism, neuropathic arthropathy, acute Schmorl nodes, SAPHO syndrome, AS and tumors are non-infectious mimics that may resemble pyogenic spondylodiscitis. Of note, tumor lesions never cross the disc space and the disc height is generally preserved.

Familial Mediterranean Fever—Brucellosis

Brucellosis is the most common zoonotic infection worldwide (108). Gram negative bacteria have affinity for the SIJ and up to 35–37% of patients with brucellosis have SIJ involvement, usually unilateral.

The most common manifestations of brucella infection are musculoskeletal and include arthralgia, myalgia and low back pain. Although sacroiliitis is less common than spondylitis, it is still a diagnostic consideration in specific clinical settings.

Brucellosis can mimic axSpA and even fulfill ASAS classification criteria for axial or peripheral SpA (99, 108, 109), when assessing for clinical, laboratory and imaging findings. The most important MRI changes are BME and bone erosions in SIJ. Compared to axSpA patients, BME in brucellosis has higher T2-intensity and usually crosses anatomical borders to affect adjacent muscles. Backfill is also documented, but resolves with antibiotic treatment.

Fungal Spondylodiscitis

Fungal spondylodiscitis is a rare occurrence, but incidence has increased over the years due to increase in immunocompromised patients (110). The most common agent is Candida albicans, followed by Aspergillus fumigatus. Diagnosis is multidisciplinary but the gold standard is histological or culture confirmation from tissue samples. The most affected segments remain the lower thoracic and lumbar spine. Imaging is non-specific and mimics pyogenic or tuberculous infection.

Tuberculous Spondylodiscitis

Spinal tuberculosis (TbS) is a common form of extrapulmonary tuberculosis and accounts for 50% of musculoskeletal tuberculosis cases (111) (Figures 9E–G). Clinical presentation is non-specific long-standing back pain, which may be investigated only after onset of neurological deficits and bone deformities. Nevertheless, in countries with a high prevalence of tuberculosis clinicians should be alerted to this possibility and include it at an early stage in the differential diagnoses, thus avoiding misdiagnosis.

Radiographs show loss of endplate margin definition, kyphotic changes, narrowing of the intervertebral disc space and calcified paravertebral masses.

TbS may resemble other pyogenic infections involving the disc. Some findings that favor TbS include: larger collections, cold abscesses adjacent to the affected spine, thoracolumbar junction, no/less involvement of the disc space, skip lesions involving multiple ligaments through subligamentous spread and whole vertebral body or posterior involvement (107, 112). Suggestion of a degenerative nature relates to the presence of vacuum phenomenon, preservation of the cortical boundaries, lack of soft-tissue involvement and stability of radiological findings.

Modic type 1 degeneration may mimic TbS, but contrast enhancement of active degenerative lesions is milder compared to TbS.

SAPHO Syndrome and CRMO

Synovitis, acne, pustulosis, hyperostosis and osteitis (SAPHO) syndrome is a rare auto-inflammatory condition that shares musculoskeletal and cutaneous manifestations (113). Chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis (CRMO) is considered the pediatric counterpart of SAPHO syndrome, arising from sterile osteomyelitis (Figures 10A–C). In CRMO, cutaneous involvement is less common and long bones are more affected compared to the sternum and clavicles in SAPHO syndrome.

FIGURE 10
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 10. Fat-saturated T2WI sagittal MRI sequence (A) of the lumbar spine in a 16-year-old female patient with CRMO (arrows), mimicking corner inflammatory lesions. Fat-saturated PD axial slice (B) of the same patient depicting involvement of the right SIJ. Fat-saturated T2WI axial slice (C) of the neck shows involvement of the left mandibular ramus.

SAPHO syndrome has been considered an umbrella term including several idiopathic disorders sharing similar clinical and radiological features, namely CRMO in children and adolescents.

Radiographs are generally normal in early-stage CRMO but may eventually show small lytic lesions which become progressively more sclerotic (114). This condition may be self-limited and eventually resolve or lead to marked hyperostosis (115).

Whole-body MRI is the gold standard modality for evaluation of SAPHO and CRMO, due to its sensitivity and lack of radiation (116). The most frequent findings are:

• Lytic lesions in early-stage

• Sclerosis, bony expansion or mixed lytic and sclerotic changes in later-stage

• Pathological or compression fractures, with associated deformities in fluid-sensitive sequences

• Bone expansion / hyperostosis in late-stage

Spinal SAPHO syndrome may mimic infectious spondylodiscitis (117). However, absence of soft-tissue masses and epidural involvement as well as the presence of anterior vertebral corner erosions differentiate it from an infectious nature. Nonetheless, bone biopsy is necessary to exclude infection or malignancy.

Metabolic Diseases

Certain metabolic diseases may show imaging changes suggestive of axSpA.

Hypoparathyroidism occasionally courses with syndesmophytosis and para-spinal ligament calcifications that resembles psoriatic arthropathy (118, 119). Other radiographic findings include diffuse increased bone mass, osteosclerosis of the calvarium with narrowed diploic space (120).

Hyperparathyroidism may course with subchondral bone resorption anywhere in the axial skeleton (Figures 11A–D). Musculoskeletal changes in hyperparathyroidism are most common in the hands (95%) (121), with pathognomonic subperiosteal bone resorption on the radial side of the middle phalanges of the middle and index fingers (122). Acro-osteolysis may also be seen, due to bone resorption of the distal phalanges. Other forms of bone resorption have been described, such as subligamentous, intracortical, subchondral, endosteal, or subtendinous locations. Subperiosteal resorption may also affect the ribs, tooth sockets, humerus, femur, and tibia. Subchondral resorption in particular can occur in any joint, along the interphalangeal and metacarpophalangeal joints, acromioclavicular joint, SIJ, and sternoclavicular joint. Subtendinous resorption is more typically found in the calcaneus, clavicle, proximal humerus and femur, ischial tuberosity, and anterior-inferior iliac spine. BME and other active and chronic features may be seen in the SIJ, but with the same frequency as that seen in healthy individuals and lower than in patients with axSpA (123).

FIGURE 11
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 11. CT sagittal reconstruction of the dorsal and lumbar spine (A,B) of a patient with renal osteodystrophy depicts abnormal bone turnover and mineralization, with diffuse osteosclerosis and multiple areas of subperiosteal resorption. Lateral lumbar spine radiography (C) shows the characteristic “rugger jersey” spine, with alternating bands of increased and normal bone density of the vertebral bodies. Note a large brown tumor of the left iliac bone on CT (D).

Changes in hyperparathyroidism resemble those from AS but are distinguished due to abscence of joint space narrowing and less pronounced articular surface irregularities.

Hypophosphatasia is a rare genetic disorder that results in accumulation of pyrophosphate, an inhibitor of bone mineralization, and development of hypophosphatemic osteomalacia. Radiological findings are similar to rickets and osteomalacia and vary according to age of presentation (121).

Paget Disease

Paget disease (PD) of bone, also known as osteitis deformans and described for the first time in 1877 by Sir James Paget, is a chronic skeletal disorder characterized by abnormal and excessive bone turnover (124) (Figures 12A–C).

FIGURE 12
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 12. Lumbosacral radiography (A), CT axial slice (B) and post-contrast fat-saturated T1WI (C) of a 65-year-old male patient with Paget disease of the sacrum and right iliac bone. Typical findings include an expanded bone with coarsened trabecular pattern and sclerotic changes that are more evident on conventional radiography. There is increased uptake after intravenous contrast injection (C).

PD is more prevalent among Anglo-Saxon descendants, males and patients over 50 years old. Prevalence increases with age but incidence has been declining over the last 20 years.

PD is a disease of largely unknown causes, but the role of environmental factors on a background of genetic susceptibility have been increasingly recognized and are proposed by some authors as the most likely etiology. Viruses seem to be the main causative agent, since patients present with intranuclear and intracytoplasmic inclusion bodies in osteoclasts and giant osteoclasts (classic features of virus infection).

The disease course can be divided in three main phases (lytic, mixed, and sclerotic), although some authors describe a fourth inactive phase. All phases can occur simultaneously in the same patient at different sites (125).

Most patients will be asymptomatic at the time of diagnosis, explaining why the disease is most often discovered incidentally. Symptoms, when present, vary depending on the distribution of the disease, with pain being the major complaint. Fractures are the most common complication (126).

Distribution is generally asymmetric, most commonly affecting the lower extremities with a slight tendency for the right-side. The most common affected sites are the lumbar spine (L4 and L5), pelvis, sacrum, femur, and calvarium (127).

PD typically begins with bone destruction translated into a lytic phase, which is characterized by intense osteoclastic activity displayed as osteolysis. Progression of the disease into a mixed lytic and sclerotic phase usually occurs with time. The four cardinal features of this stage include:

• Advancing edge of osteolysis

• Coarsening and thickening of bone trabeculae along the stress lines

• Cortical thickening

• Osseous widening/bone expansion (pathognomonic)

In long bones, early-stage PD will appear as an advancing edge of osteolysis which begins in the subchondral bone and extends to the metaphysis and diaphysis, giving the characteristic “flame” or “blade of grass” configuration.

In the spine, cortical thickening along the four margins of the vertebral body cortexes is usually seen, giving a “picture-frame appearance.”

Osteosclerotic phase is characterized by increased bone density. Coarsening of the trabeculae and cortical thickening, associated with marked widening and enlargement of bones, will be apparent in long bones and pelvis. Diffuse sclerosis of the vertebral body is typical in this stage, giving the appearance of ivory vertebra. Involvement of the spine may affect one vertebral level, multiple levels, or even all vertebral segments. Posterior vertebral elements may also be affected.

PD can also invade the intervertebral disc and articular surfaces directly, extend to ligaments, and cause ligamentous ossification.

Crystal Deposition Arthropathies

Gouty Sacroiliitis

Gout is a common metabolic disease that frequently affects middle-aged men and postmenopausal women. The most frequent manifestation is monoarthritis secondary to tophi deposition, more common at the lower extremities but eventually involving any appendicular or axial joint (128). Initial involvement of the first metatarsal-phalangeal joint may be followed by tarsal, ankle, knee, finger, wrist and elbow involvement and, less frequently, shoulders, hips, spine, and SIJ. Both the spine and SIJ may be affected, but the most common location is the lumbar spine.

Sacroiliac gout has an incidence of 7–17% (129) and symptoms are non-specific, mimicking other inflammatory, or infectious conditions. In fact, this condition is frequently misdiagnosed as AS. A correct diagnosis may require biopsy or aspiration with polarized microscopy evaluation to reveal the monosodium urate crystals.

Imaging findings are non-specific and CT is the preferred method of choice for detection of subcutaneous tophi and structural changes suggesting gouty arthritis. Dual energy CT may directly visualize and quantify crystal deposition (130).

Spinal/Sacro-iliac CPPD

Calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate crystal deposition (CPPD) may be secondary to metabolic disorders such as hemochromatosis, hyperparathyroidism and hypomagnesemia, or less commonly, a monogenic familial disease. CPPD may occur in cartilage and fibrocartilaginous joints, a process termed chondrocalcinosis. Other structures may be affected by CPPD, such as ligaments and tendons, the nucleus pulposus and annulus fibrosus of the intervertebral disc. CPPD is predominantly a peripheral arthritis, but spinal involvement has been documented (131).

A destructive arthropathy affecting the cervical and, less commonly, lumbar segments is seen and, among these segments, the transverse ligament of the atlas and, thus, the atlanto-odontoid joint is the most frequent (132, 133). CPPD deposits in the peri-odontoid region may lead to a condition called crown dens syndrome when associated with acute symptoms (134, 135). Furthermore, severe retro-odontoid deposits may generate cervical myelopathy due to spinal cord compression.

Aseptic discitis is a well-known complication of CPPD arthropathy in the axial skeleton and causes recurrent inflammatory flares (136) (vertebral endplate erosions, intervertebral disc narrowing, and gadolinium enhancement of the disc and endplate lesions.) A percutaneous biopsy of the affected structures may be necessary to exclude infection or other etiologies.

The SIJ is rarely affected but may also be responsible for acute flares. Degenerative changes in asymptomatic individuals and, occasionally, destructive changes have been described. Again, such changes are non-specific and other diagnoses should be excluded.

MRI has poor sensitivity to detect CPPD deposits, but reveals inflammatory changes of the endplates and SIJ.

Bone Tumors

Diagnosis of primary or secondary bone tumors is usually straightforward, but they may appear like BME on MRI, especially when infiltrative in nature (Lodwick type IC, II and III) (137). Their typical location, however, is not near the SIJ and lesions are better demarcated after endovenous contrast injection. The sacrum is a common site for multiple myeloma, plasmacytoma and metastasis involvement. Vertebrae are also a frequent site of metastases (Figures 13A–I).

FIGURE 13
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 13. CT axial slice (A) of an iliac bone enostosis mimicking peri-articular sclerosis; CT sagittal reconstruction (B) of the dorsal and lumbar spine in a patient with diffuse osteoblastic metastasis due to prostate cancer; lateral lumbar radiograph of the same patient (C); T1WI axial slice (D); and post-contrast fat-saturated T1WI coronal slice (E) of a patient with leukemic infiltration of the sacrum and iliac bones, showing diffuse bone marrow T1 hypointensity due to tumoral infiltration and multifocal patchy uptake, respectively; fat-saturated PD (F), post-contrast fat-saturated T1WI (G) MRI and CT axial slice (H) of a 18-year-old male patient with Ewing sarcoma; fat-saturated PD (I) MRI sequence of an aneurysmatic bone cyst of the left iliac bone.

Benign Primary Tumors–Pelvis

Most benign tumors of the pelvis occur before the age of 40. In general, benign tumors have geographical well-defined borders (Lodwick type IA or IB) and may be expansile, unlike inflammatory conditions, but occasionally appear more aggressive and have blurred borders (Lodwick type IC) (137).

In an initial assessment, benign tumors involving the posterior sacrum may be confounded with other entities, especially when seen in a young patient.

Osteochondromas are among the most common benign tumors and have a characteristic appearance of a cartilage-covered bony projection, usually pointing away from the nearby joint (138).

Giant cell tumors (GCT) are more common in women than men and usually appear in the third and fourth decades of life, after physeal closure. They can have locally aggressive features and high vascularity. A small subset of GCT is malignant (5–10%) (138). The sacrum is the most common site of involvement in the axial skeleton and GCT is the second most common tumor involving this bone, following chordoma. Imaging findings include a lytic soft-tissue mass with increased vascularity, occasionally crossing the SIJ, with low signal intensity on T1 and heterogeneous on T2 (hypointensity of the solid component) weighted-imaging. There is no periostitis or bone matrix formation; GCT may have an associated aneurysmal bone cyst, with evidence of fluid-fluid levels.

Aneurysmal bone cysts are typically lytic and well-circumscribed, expansile with thinning of the cortex. Variable T1 and T2 weighted imaging signal intensity due to the presence of blood products with different ages is common; fluid-fluid levels are characteristic, but not specific.

Benign Primary Tumors–Spine

Vertebral hemangiomas are common spinal tumors and typically multiple (139). Hemangiomas may have distinct presentations, but the most common appearance on MRI is T1 and T2 weighted imaging hyperintensity owing to their hamartomatous nature with vascular and fatty components.

Other tumors involving the spine that are more frequently seen include eosinophilic granuloma, osteoblastoma, GCT, aneurysmatic bone cyst, and osteochondroma. A detailed description goes beyond the scope of this article and is expertly addressed elsewhere (139).

Bone Marrow Infiltrative Lesions—Lymphoma, Leukemia, Multiple Myeloma, Plasmacytoma, Ewing Sarcoma, Metastasis

A wide range of conditions affect marrow composition either through infiltration or component replacement. Neoplastic and myeloproliferative processes increase cellularity and have distinct imaging patterns.

In general, tumor cells have long T1 values (decreased signal) and variable T2 values. Imaging has a role not only in diagnosis, but also evaluation of remission or progression of disease. Infiltrative marrow has a decreased T1 signal intensity, with the exception of melanoma and some cases of myeloma (140). T2 signal is more variable.

Lymphoma, leukemia, plasma cell myeloma, primary bone neoplasms, and metastatic disease may have either a focal or diffuse distribution in the bone marrow. The spine and pelvis are among the most common bones involved in these conditions (141, 142).

Spinal metastases generally appear on the posterior-superior aspect of the vertebras, in the vertebral body, and destruction of a pedicle is not an uncommon finding. Focal lytic metastases demonstrate decreased signal on T1 compared to muscle or disc, and increased signal on T2 compared to normal marrow. Blastic lesions have decreased signal on T1 and T2 weighted imaging (143). Post-contrast T1 weighted imaging sequences demonstrate mild to moderate enhancement.

MRI may document other signs of an infiltrative process, namely vertebral collapse, intra-spinal soft-tissue and cord compression, muscle infiltration or lymph node enlargement.

Both Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma tend to affect the spine (144) in a focal nodular pattern. Signal intensity on conventional MRI sequences is similar to metastatic disease from solid neoplasms, with abnormal lymphomatous marrow enhancement. Vertebral collapse and soft-tissue mass may be found.

Ewing sarcoma affecting the axial skeleton is most common in the ribs and pelvis (138).

Multiple Myeloma and Solitary Plasmacytoma

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a plasma cell dyscrasia with proliferation and accumulation of monoclonal plasma cells (145).

Conventional radiography has a low sensitivity for detection of lytic lesions, and new advances in the last 2 decades have increased the role of MRI and PET CT to evaluate bone marrow infiltration in early and late stages.

The most frequently used conventional sequences are T1 and T2 weighted acquisitions with and without fat suppression for qualitative determination of bone marrow composition and mineralized matrix (146). Dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted imaging also play a role in diagnosis.

Lesions appear hypointense on T1 and relatively hyperintense on fat-suppressed T2 due to high cellularity and water amount. MM favorably affects the axial skeleton (lower thoracic and lumbar spine) and pelvis, but also the ribs, shoulders, skull, and proximal femurs. Patterns of infiltration may differ—no change, focal infiltration, diffuse disease, salt-and-pepper involvement or combined. Almost one third of patients exhibit normal appearing marrow signal on T1 and fat-suppressed T2 weighted imaging. MM lesions have high contrast-enhancement due to neo-angiogenesis, with washout. High signal on high b-value images correspond to bone marrow infiltration.

Red bone marrow, usually more pronounced in young individuals, tends to have the same signal intensity changes compared to MM infiltrated bone marrow. Contrast-enhancement curves may vary, and Dixon techniques may be applied to distinguish red bone marrow hyperplasia from an infiltrating lesion (147).

Mean age of patients with MM is over 50 years. Subchondral geodes, schwannomas, Schmorl nodules and scar tissue from bone marrow biopsy may simulate MM on conventional MRI.

Plasmacytoma lesions generally have hypointense signal on T1 and hyperintense signal on T2 weighted imaging. Post-contrast sequences demonstrate intense enhancement. These lesions are expansile and may show a “mini-brain” appearance on axial images. Distinction from other entities such as metastasis, lymphoma or leukemia may be challenging (148).

Other Malignant Primary Tumors

Chordoma is the most common primary sacral tumor (149). It is a low-grade malignant tumor arising from notochordal remnants. Imaging shows a heterogenous sacral mass causing bone destruction and expansion. Chondrosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma and osteosarcoma also favor the pelvis, but diagnosis is usually straightforward and a detailed description goes beyond the scope of this article.

Charcot Arthropathy

Charcot neuroarthropathy of the spine, also called Charcot spine, is progressive destruction of the spinal joint due to innervation abnormalities (98, 150). Charcot spine and heterotopic ossification are possible outcomes of spinal cord injury. Heterotopic ossification occurs most often around the hip or elbow joints (151). Insensitivity to pain with failure to activate muscle contraction is the proposed etiology to these conditions.

The spinal column is involved in 6–21% of patients with neuroarthropathy (152), more often in the lower thoracic (below T10) and lumbar segments (L4–L5) (153). Imaging findings include spinal instability, bridging osteophytes, paravertebral masses, cartilaginous destruction, intervertebral disc degeneration, bone erosion, early face destruction, and pseudarthrosis. CT plays an important role in depiction of most abnormalities, with MRI providing better resolution of the adjacent soft-tissue. Description of an atrophic form and progression to a hypertrophic form may explain differences in presentation.

Spinal fusion is recommended, with high rates of recurrence.

Sclerosing Dysplasias

Sclerosing bone dysplasias (SBD) are a group of skeletal abnormalities characterized by a wide variety of clinical and radiological presentations. Hereditary SBD include osteopetrosis, pyknodysostosis, osteopathia striata, osteopoikilosis, and progressive diaphyseal dysplasia. There are some non-hereditary forms, namely melorheostosis, intramedullary osteosclerosis and overlap syndromes.

Such conditions manifest with increased bone density that may be diffuse (e.g., osteopetrosis) or focal (e.g., melorheostosis), affecting the periosteum, endosteal cortical lining, or the medullary canal, with variable distribution.

Recognition of SBD may be difficult and such conditions may mimic bone metastasis, metabolic and hematological disorders as well as inflammatory conditions.

A more detailed depiction of the most common conditions goes beyond the scope of this text and is best described elsewhere (154, 155).

Behçet Disease

Behçet Disease is a multisystem inflammatory disorder mainly manifested by oral and genital aphthous ulcers, skin lesions, and uveitis. Other systems may be less frequently affected, such as the gastrointestinal, central nervous and musculoskeletal systems, as well as the lungs and kidneys. Arthritis and arthralgia are the commonest musculoskeletal findings, interestingly associated with enthesitis in some clusters of patients (156). The chronic and vascular nature of Behçet disease, associated with drug targets that change bone metabolism might lead to reduction in bone mineral density and osteoporosis (157).

Joint manifestations are typically non-erosive, non-deforming and involve the peripheral skeleton in an oligoarticular fashion. The knee is the most frequently affected joint.

In the axial skeleton, prevalence of sacroiliitis in patients with Behçet disease is controversial–some authors report a higher prevalence while others found that there is no significant difference when compared to healthy controls (158, 159). Anecdotal reports have described other forms of axial skeleton involvement, such as atlanto-axial subluxation and instability (160).

Hemoglobinopathies

Hemoglobinopathies are genetic defects resulting in abnormal structure of the globin chain of hemoglobin molecules, and comprise sickle cell anemia and thalassemia. Sickle cell disease is an autosomal recessive disorder that results in an abnormal morphology of the red blood cell when certain stresses occur. This altered shape leads to vascular stasis, occlusion and infarction.

Musculoskeletal manifestations include bone infarction with or without superimposed infection, bone marrow expansion and hyperplasia (161) (Figures 14A–C). In an acute setting, bone infarcts may have a diffuse appearance, and eventually consolidate into a more sclerotic lesion. On MRI, a serpentine, well-demarcated appearance is seen. Growth disturbances can involve the vertebral bodies and cause decreased height, sclerosis due to bone infarcts and endplate depressions, with the classic H-shaped vertebra (162). Bone marrow hyperplasia on the anterior and posterior borders of the vertebral bodies, accompanied by central depression cause the typical “fish-like” appearance.

FIGURE 14
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 14. Fat-saturated PD (A) MRI sequence, CT axial slice (B), and sagittal lumbar spine reconstruction (C) of a 31-year-old male patient with Sickle cell disease and extensive bone marrow changes causing widening of the medullary spaces and thinning of cortical bone.

Red marrow reconversion in such patients lowers the high T1 signal intensity that is generally seen in fatty marrow of adult patients. Chemical shift imaging and the Dixon technique in particular may play a role in excluding malignant infiltration of affected bone marrow (physiologic red and fatty bone marrow will show a signal drop on out-of-phase images, but malignancy will not).

A detailed description of the musculoskeletal findings in sickle cell anemia and thalassemias goes beyond the scope of this text and has been expertly outlined elsewhere (163).

Conclusion

Low back pain (LBP) is one of the leading causes of morbidity and poses a significant economic burden in western countries with large numbers of work days lost. The SIJ and lower spine undoubtedly play a fundamental role in the pathogenesis of LBP, even in young and otherwise healthy patients. In fact, the sacrum has been coined the keystone of the pelvis, and deservedly so. Don't let the SIJ fool you—the apparent simplicity of its anatomical and biomechanical properties is only the tip of the iceberg.

AxSpA is an important inflammatory cause of chronic LBP. Clinical evaluation and identification of features suggestive of axial SpA, namely imaging features, is key to early diagnosis and to avoiding misdiagnosis. MRI is of major interest in the assessment of SIJ and the spine when an axSpA diagnosis is suspected. However, clinicians must be aware of imaging mimics and potential pitfalls. For example, although BME is an important imaging finding in axSpA, it is definitely not exclusive of this condition and mimicking changes can also be found in SIJ of healthy subjects, or SIJ presenting with morphological variants, changes related to mechanical stress, degenerative disorders, infection, and neoplastic conditions.

As a general rule of thumb, certain patterns of BME (deep involvement from articular surface, extensive lesions and close relation to other lesion types) as well as the presence of structural lesions, particularly bone erosion, ankylosis, or backfill (or fat deposition in an erosion cavity) increase the likelihood of axSpA. Contextual interpretation of the changes detected on MRI is critical. Ultimately, this information needs to be combined with clinical information, and clinical judgement remains the mainstay for the diagnosis of axSpA.

Author Contributions

All authors listed have made a substantial, direct and intellectual contribution to the work, and approved it for publication.

Funding

PM is supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) University College London Hospitals (UCLH) Biomedical Research Center (BRC).

Disclaimer

The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), (UK) National Health Service (NHS), the NIHR, or the (UK) Department of Health.

Conflict of Interest

PM has received consulting/speaker's fees from AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB all unrelated to this manuscript.

The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We thank Drs Manouk de Hooge, Filip van den Bosch and Dirk Elewaut for providing Figure 2 (images of a military subject and a postpartum female).

References

1. Maksymowych WP, Lambert RG, Ostergaard M, Pedersen SJ, Machado PM, Weber U, et al. MRI lesions in the sacroiliac joints of patients with spondyloarthritis: an update of definitions and validation by the ASAS MRI working group. Ann Rheum Dis. (2019) 78:1550–8. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215589

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Maksymowych WP, Eshed I, Machado PM, Pedersen SJ, Weber U, de Hooge M, et al. Consensus definitions for MRI lesions in the spine of patients with acial spondyloarthritis: first analysis from the assessments in spondyloarthritis international society classification cohort. Ann Rheum Dis. (2020) 79:749–50. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-eular.6304

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Hermann KG, Baraliakos X, van der Heijde DM, Jurik AG, Landewe R, Marzo-Ortega H, et al. Descriptions of spinal MRI lesions and definition of a positive MRI of the spine in axial spondyloarthritis: a consensual approach by the ASAS/OMERACT MRI study group. Ann Rheum Dis. (2012) 71:1278–88. doi: 10.1136/ard.2011.150680

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Bray TJP, Jones A, Bennett AN, Conaghan PG, Grainger A, Hodgson R, et al. Recommendations for acquisition and interpretation of MRI of the spine and sacroiliac joints in the diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis in the UK. Rheumatology. (2019) 58:1831–8. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez173

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Carvalho PD, Machado PM. How to investigate: early axial spondyloarthritis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. (2019) 33:101427. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2019.07.001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Salsabili N, Valojerdy MR, Hogg DA. Variations in thickness of articular cartilage in the human sacroiliac joint. Clin Anatomy. (1995) 8:388–90. doi: 10.1002/ca.980080603

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Gondim Teixeira PA, Bravetti M, Hossu G, Lecocq S, Petit D, Loeuille D, et al. Protocol optimization of sacroiliac joint MR Imaging at 3 Tesla: impact of coil design and motion resistant sequences on image quality. Diagn Interv Imaging. (2017) 98:865–71. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2017.06.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Weber U, Jurik AG, Zejden A, Larsen E, Jorgensen SH, Rufibach K, et al. MRI of the sacroiliac joints in athletes: recognition of non-specific bone marrow oedema by semi-axial added to standard semi-coronal scans. Rheumatology. (2020) 59:1381–90. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez458

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Lambert RG, Dhillon SS, Jaremko JL. Advanced imaging of the axial skeleton in spondyloarthropathy: techniques, interpretation, and utility. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. (2012) 16:389–400. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1329882

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Taber KH, Herrick RC, Weathers SW, Kumar AJ, Schomer DF, Hayman LA. Pitfalls and artifacts encountered in clinical MR imaging of the spine. Radiographics. (1998) 18:1499–521. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.18.6.9821197

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Krupa K, Bekiesinska-Figatowska M. Artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging. Pol J Radiol. (2015) 80:93–106. doi: 10.12659/PJR.892628

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Vleeming A, Schuenke MD, Masi AT, Carreiro JE, Danneels L, Willard FH. The sacroiliac joint: an overview of its anatomy, function and potential clinical implications. J Anat. (2012) 221:537–67. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2012.01564.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Wang D. Magnetic resonance imaging of bone marrow: a review – part I. J Am Osteopath Coll Radiol. (2012) 1:1–12. Available online at: https://www.jaocr.org/articles/magnetic-resonance-imaging-of-bone-marrow-a-review-part-i

Google Scholar

14. Ricci C, Cova M, Kang YS, Yang A, Rahmouni A, Scott WW et al. Normal age-related patterns of cellular and fatty bone marrow distribution in the axial skeleton: MR imaging study. Radiology. (1990) 177:83–8. doi: 10.1148/radiology.177.1.2399343

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. SH. D, Laniado M, Schick F, Strayle M, Claussen C. Normal sacrum bone marrow in the sacrum of young adults: differences between the sexes seen on chemical-shift MR imaging. AJR. (1994) 164:935–40. doi: 10.2214/ajr.164.4.7726052

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Nouh MR, Eid AF. Magnetic resonance imaging of the spinal marrow: Basic understanding of the normal marrow pattern and its variant. World J Radiol. (2015) 7:448–58. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v7.i12.448

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Weber U, Jurik AG, Zejden A, Larsen E, Jorgensen SH, Rufibach K, et al. Frequency and anatomic distribution of magnetic resonance imaging features in the sacroiliac joints of young athletes: exploring “background noise” toward a data-driven definition of sacroiliitis in early spondyloarthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. (2018) 70:736–45. doi: 10.1002/art.40429

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. de Winter J, de Hooge M, van de Sande M, de Jong H, van Hoeven L, de Koning A, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the sacroiliac joints indicating sacroiliitis according to the assessment of spondyloarthritis international society definition in healthy individuals, runners, and women with postpartum back pain. Arthritis Rheumatol. (2018) 70:1042–8. doi: 10.1002/art.40475

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Varkas G, de Hooge M, Renson T, De Mits S, Carron P, Jacques P, et al. Effect of mechanical stress on magnetic resonance imaging of the sacroiliac joints: assessment of military recruits by magnetic resonance imaging study. Rheumatology. (2018) 57:508–13. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex491

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Baraliakos X, Richter A, Feldmann D, Ott A, Buelow R, Schmidt CO, et al. Frequency of MRI changes suggestive of axial spondyloarthritis in the axial skeleton in a large population-based cohort of individuals aged <45 years. Ann Rheum Dis. (2020) 79:186–92. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215553

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Weber U, Ostergaard M, Lambert RG, Pedersen SJ, Chan SM, Zubler V, et al. Candidate lesion-based criteria for defining a positive sacroiliac joint MRI in two cohorts of patients with axial spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. (2015) 74:1976–82. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-205408

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Weber U, Lambert RG, Pedersen SJ, Hodler J, Ostergaard M, Maksymowych WP. Assessment of structural lesions in sacroiliac joints enhances diagnostic utility of magnetic resonance imaging in early spondylarthritis. Arthritis Care Res. (2010) 62:1763–71. doi: 10.1002/acr.20312

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Larsen E, Wilken-Jensen C, Hansen A, Jensen D, Johansen S, Minck H, et al. Symptom-giving pelvic girdle relaxation in pregnancy - part I: prevalence and risk factors. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. (1999) 78:105–10. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0412.1999.780206.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Renson T, Depicker A, De Craemer AS, Deroo L, Varkas G, de Hooge M, et al. High prevalence of spondyloarthritis-like MRI lesions in postpartum women: a prospective analysis in relation to maternal, child and birth characteristics. Ann Rheum Dis. (2020) 79:929–34. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217095

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Agten CA, Zubler V, Zanetti M, Binkert CA, Kolokythas O, Prentl E, et al. Postpartum bone marrow edema at the sacroiliac joints may mimic sacroiliitis of axial spondyloarthritis on MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol. (2018) 211:1306–12. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.19404

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Cicek H, Keskin HL, Tuhanioglu U, Kilicarslan K, Ogur HU. Simultaneous disruption of the pubic symphysis and sacroiliac joint during vaginal birth. Case Rep Orthop. (2015) 2015:812132. doi: 10.1155/2015/812132

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Lambert RG, Bakker PA, van der Heijde D, Weber U, Rudwaleit M, Hermann KG, et al. Defining active sacroiliitis on MRI for classification of axial spondyloarthritis: update by the ASAS MRI working group. Ann Rheum Dis. (2016) 75:1958–63. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208642

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Moustarhfir M, Bresson B, Koch P, Perozziello A, Barreau G, Schouman-Claeys E, et al. MR imaging of Schmorl's nodes: Imaging characteristics and epidemio-clinical relationships. Diagn Interv Imaging. (2016) 97:411–7. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2016.02.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Abbas J, Hamoud K, Peled N, Hershkovitz I. Lumbar schmorl's nodes and their correlation with spine configuration and degeneration. Biomed Res Int. (2018) 2018:1574020. doi: 10.1155/2018/1574020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. He S, Zhong B, Zhu H, Fang W, Chen L, Guo J, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty for symptomatic schmorl's nodes: 11 cases with long-term follow-up and a literature review. Pain Physician. (2017) 20:69–76. doi: 10.36076/ppj/2017/75

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Masala S, Pipitone V, Tomassini M, Massari F, Romagnoli A, Simonetti G. Percutaneous vertebroplasty in painful schmorl nodes. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. (2006) 29:97–101. doi: 10.1007/s00270-005-0153-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Diehn FE, Maus T, Morris J, Carr C, Kotsenas A, Luetmer P, et al. Uncommon manifestations of intervertebral disk pathologic conditions. Radiographics. (2016) 36:801–23. doi: 10.1148/rg.2016150223

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Chaturvedi A, Klionsky NB, Nadarajah U, Chaturvedi A, Meyers SP. Malformed vertebrae: a clinical and imaging review. Insights Imaging. (2018) 9:343–55. doi: 10.1007/s13244-018-0598-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Rutherford E, Tarplett L, Davies E, Harley J, King L. Lumbar spine fusion and stabilization: hardware, techniques, and imaging appearances. Radiographics. (2007) 27:1737–49. doi: 10.1148/rg.276065205

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Ghodasara N, Yi PH, Clark K, Fishman EK, Farshad M, Fritz J. Postoperative spinal CT: what the radiologist needs to know. Radiographics. (2019) 39:1840–61. doi: 10.1148/rg.2019190050

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Tok Umay S, Korkmaz M. Frequency of anatomical variation of the sacroiliac joint in asymptomatic young adults and its relationship with sacroiliac joint degeneration. Clin Anat. (2020) 33:839–43. doi: 10.1002/ca.23539

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Cihan OF, Karabulut M, Kilincoglu V, Yavuz N. The variations and degenerative changes of sacroiliac joints in asymptomatic adults. Folia Morphol. (2020) doi: 10.5603/FM.a2020.0032

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. El Rafei M, Badr S, Lefebvre G, Machuron F, Capon B, Flipo RM, et al. Sacroiliac joints: anatomical variations on MR images. Eur Radiol. (2018) 28:5328–37. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5540-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Demir M, Mavi A, Gumusburun E, Bayram M, Gursoy S, Nishio H. Anatomical variations with joint space measurements on CT. Kobe J Med Sci. (2007) 53:209–17.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

40. Postacchini R, Trasimeni G, Ripani F, Sessa P, Perotti S, Postacchini F. Morphometric anatomical and CT study of the human adult sacroiliac region. Surg Radiol Anat. (2017) 39:85–94. doi: 10.1007/s00276-016-1703-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Benz RM, Daikeler T, Mameghani AT, Tamborrini G, Studler U. Synostosis of the sacroiliac joint as a developmental variant, or ankylosis due to sacroiliitis? Arthritis Rheumatol. (2014) 66:2367. doi: 10.1002/art.38691

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Jagannathan D, Indiran V, Hithaya F, Alamelu M, Padmanaban S. Role of anatomical landmarks in identifying normal and transitional vertebra in lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging. Asian Spine J. (2017) 11:365–79. doi: 10.4184/asj.2017.11.3.365

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Shaikh A, Khan SA, Hussain M, Soomro S, Adel H, Adil SO, et al. Prevalence of Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebra In Individuals With Low Back Pain: Evaluation Using Plain Radiography And Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Asian Spine J. (2017) 11:892–7. doi: 10.4184/asj.2017.11.6.892

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Tins BJ, Balain B. Incidence of numerical variants and transitional lumbosacral vertebrae on whole-spine MRI. Insights Imaging. (2016) 7:199–203. doi: 10.1007/s13244-016-0468-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Ravikanth R, Majumdar P. Bertolotti's syndrome in low-backache population: Classification and imaging findings. Ci Ji Yi Xue Za Zhi. (2019) 31:90–5. doi: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_209_17

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Adams R, Herrera-Nicol S, Jenkins AL 3rd. Surgical treatment of a rare presentation of bertolotti's syndrome from castellvi type IV lumbosacral transitional vertebra: case report and review of the literature. J Neurol Surg Rep. (2018) 79:e70–4. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1667172

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Alonzo F, Cobar A, Cahueque M, Prieto JA. Bertolotti's syndrome: an underdiagnosed cause for lower back pain. J Surg Case Rep. (2018) 2018:rjy276. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjy276

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Vergauwen S, Parizel P, Breusegem L, Goethem J, Nackaerts Y, Hauwe L, et al. Distribution and incidence of degenerative spine changes in patients with a lumbo-sacral transitional vertebra. Eur Spine J. (1997) 6:168–72. doi: 10.1007/BF01301431

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Kurt EE, Turkyilmaz AK, Dadali Y, Erdem HR, Tuncay F. Are transitional vertebra and spina bifida occulta related with lumbar disc herniation and clinical parameters in young patients with chronic low back pain? Eurasian J Med. (2016) 48:177–80. doi: 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2016.0285

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Castellvi AE, Goldstein LA, Chan DP. Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae and their relationship with lumbar extradural defects. Spine. (1984) 9:493–5. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198407000-00014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Milieie C, Krolo I, Anticevic D, Roic G, Zadravec D, Bojic D, et al. Causal connection of non-specific low back pain and disc degeneration in children with transitional vertebra and/or spina bifida occulta: role of magnetic resonance – prospective study. Coll Antropol. (2012) 36:627–33.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

52. Manenti G, Iundusi R, Picchi E, Marsico S, D'Onofrio A, Rossi G, et al. Anatomical variation: T1 spina bifida occulta. Radiological findings. Radiol Case Rep. (2017) 12:207–9. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2016.11.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Urrutia J, Cuellar J, Zamora T. Spondylolysis and spina bifida occulta in pediatric patients: prevalence study using computed tomography as a screening method. Eur Spine J. (2016) 25:590–5. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3480-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Byun WM, Kim JW, Lee JK. Differentiation between symptomatic and asymptomatic extraforaminal stenosis in lumbosacral transitional vertebra: role of three-dimensional magnetic resonance lumbosacral radiculography. Korean J Radiol. (2012) 13:403–11. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2012.13.4.403

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Monu J, Crotty J, Pope T. Intraosseous pneumatocyst of the iliac bone. Clin Orthop Relat Res. (1996) 330:190–2. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199609000-00024

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Catalano O. Intraosseous pneumatocyst of the ilium: CT findings in two cases and literature review. Eur Radiol. (1997) 7:1449–51 doi: 10.1007/s003300050315

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Al-Tarawneh E, Al-Qudah M, Hadidi F, Jubouri S, Hadidy A. Incidental intraosseous pneumatocyst with gas-density-fluid level in an adolescent: a case report and review of the literature. J Radiol Case Rep. (2014) 8:16–22. doi: 10.3941/jrcr.v8i3.1540

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Cosar M, Eser O, Aslan A, Kormaz S, Boyaci G, Degirmenchi B, et al. Vertebral body pneumatocyst in the cervical spine and review of the literature. Turkish Neurosurgery. (2008) 18:197–9.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

59. Bekmez S, Ayvaz M, Mermerkaya MU, Tokgozoglu M. Iliac bone cysts adjacent to the sacroiliac joint: an unusual cause of sacroiliac pain. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. (2014) 48:495–9. doi: 10.3944/AOTT.2014.14.0039

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Hughes RJ, Harish S, Saifuddin A, O'Donnell P. On the AJR digital viewbox. Large synovial cyst arising from the sacroiliac joint. AJR Am J Roentgenol. (2006) 187:W137. doi: 10.2214/AJR.05.0842

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Strully K. Lumbar and sacral cysts of meningeal origin. Radiology. (1994) 62:544–9. doi: 10.1148/62.4.544

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Murphy K, Oaklander AL, Elias G, Kathuria S, Long DM. Treatment of 213 patients with symptomatic tarlov cysts by CT-guided percutaneous injection of fibrin sealant. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. (2016) 37:373–9. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4517

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Boukobza M, Roussel A, Fernandez-Rodriguez P, Laissy JP. Giant multiple and bilateral presacral tarlov cysts mimicking adnexal mass - imaging features. Int Med Case Rep J. (2018) 11:181–4. doi: 10.2147/IMCRJ.S147791

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Gossner J. High prevalence of cervical perineural cysts on cervical spine MRI-case series. Int J Anat Var. (2018) 11:18–9. Available online at: https://www.pulsus.com/scholarly-articles/high-prevalence-of-cervical-perineural-cysts-on-cervical-spine-mricase-series-4271.html

Google Scholar

65. Rafiq MK. A cyst in the sacrum. BMJ Case Rep. (2009) 2009. doi: 10.1136/bcr.11.2008.1285

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Diel J, Ortiz O, Losada RA, Price DB, Hayt MW, Katz DS. The sacrum: pathologic spectrum, multimodality imaging, and subspecialty approach. Radiographics. (2001) 21:83–104. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.21.1.g01ja0883

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Quattrocchi CC, Giona A, Di Martino A, Gaudino F, Mallio CA, Errante Y, et al. Lumbar subcutaneous edema and degenerative spinal disease in patients with low back pain: a retrospective MRI study. Musculoskelet Surg. (2015) 99:159–63. doi: 10.1007/s12306-015-0355-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Baraliakos X, Hermann KG, Braun J. Imaging in axial spondyloarthritis: diagnostic problems and pitfalls. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. (2012) 38:513–22. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2012.08.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Kushchayev SV, Glushko T, Jarraya M, Schuleri KH, Preul MC, Brooks ML, et al. ABCs of the degenerative spine. Insights Imaging. (2018) 9:253–74. doi: 10.1007/s13244-017-0584-z

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Song Q, Liu X, Chen DJ, Lai Q, Tang B, Zhang B, et al. Evaluation of MRI and CT parameters to analyze the correlation between disc and facet joint degeneration in the lumbar three-joint complex. Medicine. (2019) 98:e17336. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017336

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Damborg F, Engell V, Nielsen J, Kyvik KO, Andersen MO, Thomsen K. Genetic epidemiology of Scheuermann's disease. Acta Orthop. (2011) 82:602–5. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2011.618919

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Zaidman AM, Zaidman MN, Strokova EL, Korel AV, Kalashnikova EV, Rusova TV, et al. The mode of inheritance of Scheuermann's disease. Biomed Res Int. (2013) 2013:973716. doi: 10.1155/2013/973716

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

73. Heithoff KB, Gundry CR, Burton CV, Winter RB. Juvenile discogenic disease. Spine. (1994) 19:335–40. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199402000-00014

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Cidem M, Capkin E, Karkucak M, Karaca A. Osteitis condensans ilii in differential diagnosis of patients with chronic low back pain: a review of the literature. Mod Rheumatol. (2012) 22:467–9. doi: 10.3109/s10165-011-0513-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

75. Ma L, Gao Z, Zhong Y, Meng Q. Osteitis condensans ilii may demonstrate bone marrow edema on sacroiliac joint magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Rheum Dis. (2018) 21:299–307. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.13125

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

76. Poddubnyy D, Weineck H, Diekhoff T, Redeker I, Gobejishvili N, Llop M, et al. Clinical and imaging characteristics of Osteitis condensans ilii as compared with axial spondyloarthritis. Rheumatology. (2020) 59:3798–806. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa175

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

77. Slobodin G, Lidar M, Eshed I. Clinical and imaging mimickers of axial spondyloarthritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. (2017) 47:361–8. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2017.05.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

78. Mader R, Verlaan JJ, Eshed I, Bruges-Armas J, Puttini PS, Atzeni F, et al. Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH): where we are now and where to go next. RMD Open. (2017) 3:e000472. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2017-000472

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

79. Toyoda H, Terai H, Yamada K, Suzuki A, Dohzono S, Matsumoto T, et al. Prevalence of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis in patients with spinal disorders. Asian Spine J. (2017) 11:63–70. doi: 10.4184/asj.2017.11.1.63

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

80. Olivieri I, D'Angelo S, Palazzi C, Padula A, Mader R, Khan M. Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis: differentiation from ankylosing spondylitis. Curr Rheumatol Rep. (2009) 11:321–8. doi: 10.1007/s11926-009-0046-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

81. Diederichs G, Engelken F, Marshall LM, Peters K, Black DM, Issever AS, et al. Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH): relation to vertebral fractures and bone density. Osteoporos Int. (2011) 22:1789–97. doi: 10.1007/s00198-010-1409-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

82. Panwar J, Mathew AJ, Jindal N, Danda D. Utility of plain radiographs in metabolic bone disease - a case-based pictorial review from a tertiary centre. Pol J Radiol. (2017) 82:333–44. doi: 10.12659/PJR.901601

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

83. Mader R, Baraliakos X, Eshed I, Novofastovski I, Bieber A, Verlaan JJ, et al. Imaging of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH). RMD Open. (2020) 6:e001151. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2019-001151

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

84. Kim BS, Moon MS, Yoon MG, Kim ST, Kim SJ, Kim MS, et al. Prevalence of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis diagnosed by whole spine computed tomography: a preliminary study. Clin Orthop Surg. (2018) 10:41–6. doi: 10.4055/cios.2018.10.1.41

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

85. Hiyama A, Katoh H, Sakai D, Sato M, Tanaka M, Watanabe M. Prevalence of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) assessed with whole-spine computed tomography in 1479 subjects. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. (2018) 19:178. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2108-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

86. Campbell SE, Fajardo RS. Imaging of stress injuries of the pelvis. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. (2008) 12:62–71. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1067938

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

87. Micheli LJ, Curtis C. Stress fractures in the spine and sacrum. Clin Sports Med. (2006) 25:75–88, ix. doi: 10.1016/j.csm.2005.08.001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

88. Urits I, Orhurhu V, Callan J, Maganty NV, Pousti S, Simopoulos T, et al. Sacral insufficiency fractures: a review of risk factors, clinical presentation, and management. Curr Pain Headache Rep. (2020) 24:10. doi: 10.1007/s11916-020-0848-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

89. Kinoshita H, Miyakoshi N, Kobayashi T, Abe T, Kikuchi K, Shimada Y. Comparison of patients with diagnosed and suspected sacral insufficiency fractures. J Orthop Sci. (2019) 24:702–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2018.12.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

90. Cho CH, Mathis JM, Ortiz O. Sacral fractures and sacroplasty. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. (2010) 20:179–86. doi: 10.1016/j.nic.2010.02.004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

91. Murthy NS. Imaging of stress fractures of the spine. Radiol Clin North Am. (2012) 50:799–821. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2012.04.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

92. Hollenberg GM, Beattie PF, Meyers SP, Weinberg EP, Adams MJ. Stress reactions of the lumbar pars interarticularis. Spine. (2002) 27:181–6. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200201150-00012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

93. Kiel J, Kaiser K. Stress Reaction and Fractures. Bethesda, MD: StatPearls Publishing (2020)

Google Scholar

94. Nusselt T, Klinger H, Schultz W, Baums M. Fatigue stress fractures of the pelvis: a rare cause of low back pain in female athletes. Acta Orthop Belg. (2010) 76:838–43.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

95. Rotem G, Herman A, Lidar M, Eshed I. Post-traumatic arthritis of the sacroiliac joints mimicking inflammatory sacroiliitis: analysis of consecutive computed tomography examinations. Clin Radiol. (2020) 75:433–40. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2020.01.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

96. Habib N, Filardo G, Delcogliano M, Arigoni M, Candrian C. An algorithm to avoid missed open-book pelvic fractures. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. (2018) 22:2973–7. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201805_15052

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

97. Tonne B, Kempton L, Lack W, Karunakar M. Posterior iliac offset: description of a new radiological measurement of sacroiliac joint instability. Bone Joint J. (2014) 96:1535–9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B11.33633

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

98. Yoo SJ, Lee S, Ryu JA. Differential imaging features of widening and pseudo-widening of the sacroiliac joints. Arthritis Rheumatol. (2018) 70:755. doi: 10.1002/art.40440

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

99. Wang Y, Gao D, Ji X, Zhang J, Wang X, Jin J, et al. When brucellosis met the assessment of spondyloarthritis international society classification criteria for spondyloarthritis: a comparative study. Clin Rheumatol. (2019) 38:1873–80. doi: 10.1007/s10067-019-04481-w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

100. Hermet M, Minichiello E, Flipo R, Dubost J, Allanore Y, Ziza J, et al. Infectious sacroiliitis: a retrospective, multicentre study of 39 adults. BMC Infect Dis. (2012) 12:305. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-12-305

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

101. Mavrogenis AF, Megaloikonomos PD, Igoumenou VG, Panagopoulos GN, Giannitsioti E, Papadopoulos A, et al. Spondylodiscitis revisited. EFORT Open Rev. (2017) 2:447–61. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.2.160062

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

102. Dunbar JA, Sandoe JA, Rao AS, Crimmins DW, Baig W, Rankine JJ. The MRI appearances of early vertebral osteomyelitis and discitis. Clin Radiol. (2010) 65:974–81. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2010.03.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

103. Laur O, Mandell JC, Titelbaum DS, Cho C, Smith SE, Khurana B. Acute nontraumatic back pain: infections and mimics. Radiographics. (2019) 39:287–8. doi: 10.1148/rg.2019180077

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

104. Raghavan M, Lazzeri E, Palestro CJ. Imaging of spondylodiscitis. Semin Nucl Med. (2018) 48:131–47. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2017.11.001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

105. Babic M, Simpfendorfer CS. Infections of the Spine. Infect Dis Clin North Am. (2017) 31:279–97. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2017.01.003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

106. Tali ET, Oner AY, Koc AM. Pyogenic spinal infections. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. (2015) 25:193–208. doi: 10.1016/j.nic.2015.01.003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

107. Diehn FE. Imaging of spine infection. Radiol Clin North Am. (2012) 50:777–98. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2012.04.001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

108. Ye C, Shen GF, Li SX, Dong LL, Yu YK, Tu W, et al. Human brucellosis mimicking axial spondyloarthritis: a challenge for rheumatologists when applying the 2009 ASAS criteria. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci. (2016) 36:368–71. doi: 10.1007/s11596-016-1593-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

109. Garip Y, Eser F, Erten S, Yilmaz O, Yildirim P. Brucellosis in spondyloarthritis mimicking an exacerbation. Acta Reumatol Port. (2014) 39:351–2.

Google Scholar

110. Caldera G, Cahueque Lemus MA. Fungal spondylodiscitis: review. J Spine. (2016) 5:1–6. doi: 10.4172/2165-7939.1000302

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

111. Ali A, Musbahi O, White VLC, Montgomery AS. Spinal tuberculosis: a literature review. JBJS Rev. (2019) 7:e9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.18.00035

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

112. Afonso P, Almeida A. Espondilodiscite tuberculosa - aspectos imagiológicos. Acta Med Port. (2011) 24:349–54. Available online at: https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/viewFile/1611/1194

Google Scholar

113. Figueiredo ASB, Oliveira AL, Caetano A, Moraes-Fontes MF. SAPHO: has the time come for tailored therapy? Clin Rheumatol. (2020) 39:177–87. doi: 10.1007/s10067-019-04675-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

114. Jurik AG, Klicman RF, Simoni P, Robinson P, Teh J. SAPHO and CRMO: the value of imaging. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. (2018) 22:207–24. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1639469

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

115. Zhao Y, Ferguson PJ. Chronic nonbacterial osteomyelitis and chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis in children. Pediatr Clin North Am. (2018) 65:783–800. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2018.04.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

116. Andronikou S, Mendes da Costa T, Hussien M, Ramanan AV. Radiological diagnosis of chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis using whole-body MRI-based lesion distribution patterns. Clin Radiol. (2019) 74:737.e3–15. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.02.021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

117. Sato TS, Watal P, Ferguson PJ. Imaging mimics of chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis: avoiding pitfalls in a diagnosis of exclusion. Pediatr Radiol. (2020) 50:124–36. doi: 10.1007/s00247-019-04510-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

118. Kajitani TR, Silva RV, Bonfa E, Pereira RM. Hypoparathyroidism mimicking ankylosing spondylitis and myopathy: a case report. Clinics. (2011) 66:1287–90. doi: 10.1590/S1807-59322011000700028

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

119. Memetoglu O, Ozkan F, Taraktas A, Aktas I, Nazikoglu C. Idiopathic hypoparathyroidism mimicking ankylosing spondylitis: a case report. Acta Reumatol Port. (2016) 41:82–5.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

120. Goswami R, Ray D, Sharma R, Tomar N, Gupta R, Gupta N, et al. Presence of spondyloarthropathy and its clinical profile in patients with hypoparathyroidism. Clin Endocrinol. (2008) 68:258–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2007.03032.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

121. Chang C, Rosenthal D, Mitchell D, Handa A, Kattapuram S, Huang A. Imaging findings of metabolic bone disease. Radiographics. (2016) 36:1871–87. doi: 10.1148/rg.2016160004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

122. Patel CN, Scarsbrook AF. Multimodality imaging in hyperparathyroidism. Postgrad Med J. (2009) 85:597–605. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2008.077842

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

123. Tezcan ME, Temizkan S, Ozal ST, Gul D, Aydin K, Ozderya A, et al. Evaluation of acute and chronic MRI features of sacroiliitis in asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroid patients. Clin Rheumatol. (2016) 35:2777–82. doi: 10.1007/s10067-016-3172-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

124. Lalam RK, Cassar-Pullicino VN, Winn N. Paget disease of bone. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. (2016) 20:287–99. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1592368

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

125. Smith S, Murphey MD, Motamedi K, Mulligan ME, Resnik CS, Gannon FH. From the archives of the AFIP - radiologic spectrum of paget disease of bone and its complications with pathologic correlation. Radiographics. (2002) 22:1191–216. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.22.5.g02se281191

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

126. Theodorou DJ, Theodorou SJ, Kakitsubata Y. Imaging of paget disease of bone and its musculoskeletal complications: self-assessment module. AJR Am J Roentgenol. (2011) 196 (6 Suppl):WS53–6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.7303

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

127. Cortis K, Micallef K, Mizzi A. Imaging paget's disease of bone–from head to toe. Clin Radiol. (2011) 66:662–72. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2010.12.016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

128. de Mello FM, Helito PV, Bordalo-Rodrigues M, Fuller R, Halpern AS. Axial gout is frequently associated with the presence of current tophi, although not with spinal symptoms. Spine. (2014) 39:E1531–6. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000633

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

129. Chen W, Wang Y, Li Y, Zhao Z, Feng L, Zhu J, et al. Gout mimicking spondyloarthritis: case report and literature review. J Pain Res. (2017) 10:1511–4. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S133572

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

130. Namas R, Hegazin SB, Memisoglu E, Joshi A. Lower back pain as a manifestation of acute gouty sacroiliitis: utilization of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) in establishing a diagnosis. Eur J Rheumatol. (2019) 6:216–8. doi: 10.5152/eurjrheum.2019.18097

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

131. Moshrif A, Laredo JD, Bassiouni H, Abdelkareem M, Richette P, Rigon MR, et al. Spinal involvement with calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease in an academic rheumatology center: a series of 37 patients. Semin Arthritis Rheum. (2019) 48:1113–26. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2018.10.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

132. Kakitsubata Y, Boutin R, Theodorou D, Kerr R, Steinbach L, Chan K, et al. Calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate crystal deposition in and around the atlantoaxial joint: association with type 2 odontoid fractures in nine patients. Radiology. (2000) 216:213–9. doi: 10.1148/radiology.216.1.r00jl36213

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

133. Chang E, Lim W, Wolfson T, Gamst A, Chung C, Bae W, et al. Frequency of atlantoaxial calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate deposition at CT. Radiology. (2013) 269:519–24. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13130125

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

134. Oka A, Okazaki K, Takeno A, Kumanomido S, Kusunoki R, Sato S, et al. Crowned dens syndrome: report of three cases and a review of the literature. J Emerg Med. (2015) 49:e9–13. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.02.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

135. Scutellari PN, Galeotti R, Leprotti S, Ridolfi M, Franciosi R, Antinolfi G. The crowned dens syndrome. Evaluation with CT imaging. Radiol Med. (2007) 112:195–207. doi: 10.1007/s11547-007-0135-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

136. Resnick D, Pineda C. Vertebral involvement in calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate crystal deposition disease. Radiology. (1984) 153:55–60. doi: 10.1148/radiology.153.1.6089266

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

137. Grünberg K. Benign and Malignant Bone Tumors: Radiological Diagnosis and Imaging Features (2013). Erlangen: Siemens Healthcare GmbH.

Google Scholar

138. Girish G, Finlay K, Morag Y, Brandon C, Jacobson J, Jamadar D. Imaging review of skeletal tumors of the pelvis–part I: benign tumors of the pelvis. ScientificWorldJournal. (2012) 2012:290930. doi: 10.1100/2012/290930

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

139. Rodallec M, Feydy A, Larousserie F, Anract P, Campagna R, Babinet A, et al. Diagnostic imaging of solitary tumors of the spine: what to do and say. Radiographics. (2008) 28:1019–41. doi: 10.1148/rg.284075156

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

140. El Kharboutly A, El Deep D. Role of MRI in the diagnosis of bone marrow infiltrative lesions. Tanta Med J. (2016) 44:64–75. doi: 10.4103/1110-1415.189346

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

141. Long SS, Yablon CM, Eisenberg RL. Bone marrow signal alteration in the spine and sacrum. AJR Am J Roentgenol. (2010) 195:W178–200. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.4134

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

142. Keraliya AR, Krajewski KM, Jagannathan JP, Shinagare AB, Braschi-Amirfarzan M, Tirumani SH, et al. Multimodality imaging of osseous involvement in haematological malignancies. Br J Radiol. (2016) 89:20150980. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20150980

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

143. Hwang S, Panicek DM. Magnetic resonance imaging of bone marrow in oncology, Part 2. Skeletal Radiol. (2007) 36:1017–27. doi: 10.1007/s00256-007-0308-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

144. Moore SG, Gooding CA, Brasch RC, Ehman RL, Ringertz HG, Ablin AR, et al. Bone marrow in children with acute lymphocytic leukemia: MR relaxation times. Radiology. (1986) 160:237–40. doi: 10.1148/radiology.160.1.3459212

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

145. Healy CF, Murray JG, Eustace SJ, Madewell J, O'Gorman PJ, O'Sullivan P. Multiple myeloma: a review of imaging features and radiological techniques. Bone Marrow Res. (2011) 2011:583439. doi: 10.1155/2011/583439

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

146. Silva JR Jr., Hayashi D, Yonenaga T, Fukuda K, Genant HK, et al. MRI of bone marrow abnormalities in hematological malignancies. Diagn Interv Radiol. (2013) 19:393–9. doi: 10.5152/dir.2013.067

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

147. Dutoit JC, Verstraete KL. MRI in multiple myeloma: a pictorial review of diagnostic and post-treatment findings. Insights Imaging. (2016) 7:553–69. doi: 10.1007/s13244-016-0492-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

148. Ormond Filho AG, Carneiro BC, Pastore D, Silva IP, Yamashita SR, Consolo FD, et al. Whole-body imaging of multiple myeloma: diagnostic criteria. Radiographics. (2019) 39:1077–97. doi: 10.1148/rg.2019180096

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

149. Kocaoglu M, Frush DP. Pediatric presacral masses. Radiographics. (2006) 26:833–57. doi: 10.1148/rg.263055102

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

150. Lee D, Dahdaleh NS. Charcot spinal arthropathy. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. (2018) 9:9–19. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_130_17

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

151. Elgafy H, Tranovich M, Elsamaloty L. Charcot spine neuroarthropathy and hip heterotopic ossification. Spine J. (2016) 16:e443–4. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.01.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

152. Staudt MD, Bailey CS, Siddiqi F. Charcot spinal arthropathy in patients with congenital insensitivity to pain: a report of two cases and review of the literature. Neurosurg Rev. (2018) 41:899–908. doi: 10.1007/s10143-017-0814-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

153. Solinsky R, Donovan JM, Kirshblum SC. Charcot Spine following chronic spinal cord injury: an analysis of 201 published cases. Spinal Cord. (2019) 57:85–90. doi: 10.1038/s41393-018-0216-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

154. Ihde LL, Forrester DM, Gottsegen CF, Masih S, Patel DB, Vachon LA, et al. Sclerosing bone dysplasias: review and differentiation from other causes of osteosclerosis. Radiographics. (2011) 31:1865–82. doi: 10.1148/rg.317115093

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

155. Boulet C, Madani H, Lenchik L, Vanhoenacker F, Amalnath DS, de Mey J, et al. Sclerosing bone dysplasias: genetic, clinical and radiology update of hereditary and non-hereditary disorders. Br J Radiol. (2016) 89:20150349. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20150349

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

156. Kocyigit H, Turan Y, Bayram K, Gurgan A, Deveci H, Guvenc A. Coexistence of behçet's disease and ankylosing spondylitis: a case report. Turkish J Rheumatol. (2010) 25:217–20. doi: 10.5152/tjr.2010.32

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

157. Bicer A. Musculoskeletal findings in behcet's disease. Patholog Res Int. (2012) 2012:653806. doi: 10.1155/2012/653806

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

158. Canella C, Costa F, Bacchiega AB, Marchiori E. Sacroiliitis in behcet syndrome. J Clin Rheumatol. (2013) 19:356. doi: 10.1097/RHU.0b013e3182a2a048

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

159. Cobankara V. SAT0292 Clinical, imaging and laboratory variables fail to predict morphological vascular progression in takayasu arteritis. Ann Rheum Dis. (2014) 73 (Suppl 2):698.4-9. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-eular.5598

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

160. Kim SH, Eoh W. Progressive atlanto-axial subluxation in Behcet's disease. Skeletal Radiol. (2010) 39:295–7. doi: 10.1007/s00256-009-0815-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

161. Ejindu V, Hine A, Mashayekhi M, Shorvon P, Misra R. Musculoskeletal manifestations of sickle cell disease. Radiographics. (2007) 27:1005–22. doi: 10.1148/rg.274065142

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

162. Ganguly A, Boswell W, Aniq H. Musculoskeletal manifestations of sickle cell anaemia: a pictorial review. Anemia. (2011) 2011:794283. doi: 10.1155/2011/794283

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

163. Kosaraju V, Harwani A, Partovi S, Bhojwani N, Garg V, Ayyappan S, et al. Imaging of musculoskeletal manifestations in sickle cell disease patients. Br J Radiol. (2017) 90:20160130. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20160130

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: axial spondyloarthritis, magnetic resonance imaging, radiography, computed tomography, differential diagnosis, pitfall, normal variant, mimic

Citation: Caetano AP, Mascarenhas VV and Machado PM (2021) Axial Spondyloarthritis: Mimics and Pitfalls of Imaging Assessment. Front. Med. 8:658538. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.658538

Received: 26 January 2021; Accepted: 11 March 2021;
Published: 22 April 2021.

Edited by:

Xenofon Baraliakos, Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Germany

Reviewed by:

Juan Carlos Nieto González, Gregorio Marañón Hospital, Spain
Mauro Waldemar Keiserman, Hospital São Lucas da PUCRS, Brazil

Copyright © 2021 Caetano, Mascarenhas and Machado. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Pedro M. Machado, p.machado@ucl.ac.uk; orcid.org/0000-0002-8411-7972

These authors have contributed equally to this work