Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Med., 29 May 2024
Sec. Precision Medicine
Volume 11 - 2024 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1423460

Editorial: Precision treatments for patients with obesity

  • 1Sección de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigación, Escuela Superior de Medicina, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Ciudad de México, Mexico
  • 2Dirección de Investigación, Instituto Nacional de Geriatría, Ciudad de México, Mexico
  • 3Dana-Faber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States

Editorial on the Research Topic
Precision treatments for patients with obesity

Obesity is regarded as a complex and highly prevalent condition of multifactorial origin, which is associated with an increase in the risk of multiple chronic and incapacitating diseases and a decrease in life expectancy (1). This conceptualization would seem to integrate the available information on the multiple and redundant regulatory mechanisms of body energy balance, the numerous genetic, environmental, psychological, socioeconomic and cultural factors that lead to obesity and the associated health risks, and the alarming statistics on the prevalence of this disease (24).

The extraordinary complexity of obesity is proportional to the lack of suitable guides for a rational and appropriate treatment plan to reach weight loss goals in the short and long term, and also to the deficiency in the knowledge about special cares aimed at the patient with obesity suffering from various diseases.

The Research Topic titled: “Precision Treatments for Patients with Obesity,” was conceived with the intention of including scientific contributions that offer valuable insights into the treatment of patients with obesity, who are subject to various relevant conditions, as well as on potential factors that influence the genesis or the efficacy of obesity therapy and the improvement of personalized management of patient with obesity.

The experience with the current options for treating obesity, whether behavioral modification of lifestyle, pharmacotherapy, and bariatric surgery has shown that the effectiveness and risk of these strategies increase in the same order, in contrast to their accessibility, and that in all of them, a high level of interindividual variability in the amount of weight loss is observed. Furthermore, despite the imperative of implementing personalized strategies for treating obesity, there are currently no prospective studies that demonstrate that an individualized approach based on genotype or phenotype will yield uniform efficacy success (5).

Interestingly, other authors have postulated that the impact of this complex interconnection of factors that limit effective weight loss can be evaluated and projected early by assessing the response to short-term pharmacological treatments, considering as combined predictive factors the weight reduction achieved at the first month and the eventual development of tolerance to the treatment (6, 7). Naturally, the study of the potential impact of these predictive factors on the new monotherapy or combined pharmacological modalities, and even behavioral modification regimens, could be used to generate the basis for a more rational and defined anti-obesity treatment strategies.

Other studies included in this topic emphasize the significance of examining individual factors in the identification of risk factors for obesity, or those whose incorporation could be beneficial for the successful management of obesity.

Some medications, including antidiabetic and antidepressant drugs, are well known to produce weight gain, including antidepressant drugs (8). Segura-Cervantes et al. contributed with a non-clinical study examining the metabolic and body composition consequences of antibiotic administration in newborn rats. The administration of antibiotics frequently used in neonatal intensive care units to rats at birth was associated with an increase in weight gain due to fat accumulation and a deficient regulation of carbohydrates and lipids. These effects were not homogeneous for the antibiotics tested, and they were considered to be likely related to changes in the microbiota. The authors emphasized the need to develop careful protocols for the selection of antibiotics to be used in newborns as a goal to reduce metabolic consequences and the risk of obesity and diabetes later in life.

Lifestyle interventions for weight loss based on diet and exercise are the cornerstone of obesity therapy (9). Caicedo-Trujillo et al. presented a review of inspiratory muscle training in patients with obesity. They found that this approach improves physical capacity and inspiratory muscle strength without significant changes in lung function, body mass index, or metabolic parameters. The use of this strategy could be useful in subjects with obesity and with impaired exercise tolerance and poor therapy adherence.

Sarzani et al. collaborated with a narrative review on the accumulation of visceral adipose tissue as the primary cause of numerous cardiometabolic consequences. The authors emphasize the significance of adopting an adipocentric approach to address early and intensive visceral adipose tissue excess, rather than awaiting the onset of potentially hazardous cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and renal adiposity-related conditions. Furthermore, the authors suggested that the combination of the innovative drugs glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and sodium/glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors would be an effective initial treatment for obesity.

The other study by Martínez-Camacho et al. focused on a narrative review to examine the physical and respiratory care required by a critically ill patient with obesity. This type of patients is subject to metabolic stress and the consequent alterations in resting energy expenditure, hyperglycemia, loss of muscle mass, and issues related to mental health and cognitive functions. In this study, the authors emphasize the importance of having a multidisciplinary team involved in the early rehabilitation program and providing adequate ventilatory support.

Perichart-Perera et al. presented a protocol aimed at evaluating a multicomponent nutritional intervention for the prevention of gestational diabetes and infant growth and neurodevelopment impairment, based on the rationale that obesity is associated with micronutrient deficiencies and that the internal environment of the pregnant woman with obesity is characterized by inflammation and oxidative stress and that intensive nutritional care, additional to routine care, could help in the prevention of gestational diabetes mellitus, other perinatal outcomes, maternal and newborn nutritional status, infant growth, adiposity, and neurodevelopment compared to usual care in pregnant women with obesity.

In conclusion, this topic research provides insight into the study of a number of variables that could influence the early development of obesity or associated comorbidities, but also those related to the establishment of specific strategies to improve adherence and the foundation of expectations of treatment effectiveness. This type of effort will undoubtedly encourage the advancement and development of studies that attempt to tailor treatments to the obese subpopulation, as an essential part of the growth and development of precision medicine.

Author contributions

HR-G: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. AK-G: Writing – review & editing. AV-C: Writing – review & editing. JR-G: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Hruby A, Hu FB. The epidemiology of obesity: a big picture. Pharmacoeconomics. (2015) 33:673–89. doi: 10.1007/s40273-014-0243-x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Seeley RJ, Woods SC. Monitoring of stored and available fuel by the CNS: implications for obesity. Nat Rev Neurosci. (2003) 4:901–9. doi: 10.1038/nrn1245

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Lecube A, Monereo S, Rubio MÁ, Martínez-de-Icaya P, Martí A, Salvador J, et al. Prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of obesity. 2016 position statement of the Spanish Society for the Study of Obesity. Endocrinol Diabetes Nutr. (2017) 64:15–22. doi: 10.1016/j.endonu.2016.07.002

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. NCD Risk Factor Collaboration. Worldwide trends in body-mass index, underweight, overweight, and obesity from 1975 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 2416 population-based measurement studies in 128·9 million children, adolescents, and adults. Lancet. (2017) 390:2627–42. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32129-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Bray GA, Ryan DH. Evidence-based weight loss interventions: Individualized treatment options to maximize patient outcomes. Diabetes Obes Metab. (2021) 23:50–62. doi: 10.1111/dom.14200

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Rocha-González HI, De la Cruz-Álvarez LE, Kammar-García A, Canizales-Quinteros S, Huerta-Cruz JC, Barranco-Garduño LM, et al. Weight loss at first month and development of tolerance as possible predictors of 30 mg phentermine efficacy at 6 months. J Pers Med. (2021) 11:1354. doi: 10.3390/jpm11121354

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Huerta-Cruz JC, Rocha-González HI, Kammar-García A, Canizales-Quinteros S, Barranco-Garduño LM, Reyes-García JG. Combined first month body weight loss and development of tolerance as predictors of 6-month efficacy of mazindol in mild and moderate obese subjects. J Clin Med. (2022) 11:3211. doi: 10.3390/jcm11113211

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Apovian CM, Aronne LJ, Bessesen DH, McDonnell ME, Murad MH, Pagotto U, et al. Pharmacological management of obesity: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2015) 100:342–62. doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-3415

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Wadden TA, Butryn ML, Wilson C. Lifestyle modification for the management of obesity. Gastroenterology. (2007) 132:2226–38. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.03.051

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: interindividual variability, obesity, personalized medicine, precision treatments, risk factors

Citation: Rocha-González HI, Kammar-García A, Vargas-Castillo A and Reyes-García JG (2024) Editorial: Precision treatments for patients with obesity. Front. Med. 11:1423460. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1423460

Received: 25 April 2024; Accepted: 10 May 2024;
Published: 29 May 2024.

Edited and reviewed by: Alice Chen, Consultant, Potomac, MD, United States

Copyright © 2024 Rocha-González, Kammar-García, Vargas-Castillo and Reyes-García. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Héctor Isaac Rocha-González, hrochag@ipn.mx; Juan Gerardo Reyes-García, jgreyesg@ipn.mx

Download