Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Microbiol., 10 April 2024
Sec. Microbiological Chemistry and Geomicrobiology
This article is part of the Research Topic Bioleaching and Biorecovery of Critical Raw Materials from Secondary Sources View all 5 articles

Editorial: Bioleaching and biorecovery of critical raw materials from secondary sources

  • 1Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
  • 2CAS Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Corrosion and Bio-fouling, Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, China
  • 3Guangxi Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science, Institute of Marine Corrosion Protection, Guangxi Academy of Sciences, Nanning, China
  • 4Aquatic Biotechnology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
  • 5Institute of Biosciences, Freiberg University of Mining and Technology, Freiberg, Germany

Bioleaching has emerged as a sustainable and green technology for metal recovery and is an alternative to conventional extractive processes with a reduced effect on climate change (Mohan and Joseph, 2020). This approach has been used commercially for the extraction of metals from low-grade ores and attracts attention for applying innovative methods to mobilize critical metals from secondary sources (Castro et al., 2020; Danouche et al., 2024), such as e-wastes (Baniasadi et al., 2019; Adetunji et al., 2023), spent catalysts (Moosakazemi et al., 2023), fly ash, red mud (Hedrich and Schippers, 2021), and scraps (Ilyas et al., 2013), to contribute to the development of a circular economy.

There is a growing interest in mine tailings as well as several end-of-life products to start value recovery from waste, with a focus on strategic metals (Zhang et al., 2020; Schueler et al., 2024). Bioleaching makes use of microorganisms' metabolic activities, which produce lixiviants, such as organic acids and siderophores that facilitate the dissolution of metals in the presence of large amounts of organic compounds.

Moreover, biorecovery involves the use of microorganisms or biomasses to selectively accumulate and concentrate target metals from leachates. The integration of biohydrometallurgical techniques into the recycling loop has great potential to promote a circular economy where valuable metals are efficiently extracted, recycled, and reused. In this way, the dependency on primary resources may be reduced, and the ecological footprint of the mining industry may be mitigated.

The main purpose of this Research Topic is to present recent advances in the use of bioleaching and biorecovery for critical raw materials from industrial wastes. Within this topic, four articles have been published on innovative bioleaching processes, including the design and optimization of bioreactors and the utilization and characterization of valuable sources of strategic metals.

Red mud is a hazardous alkaline waste from the digestion of bauxite in the Bayer process for alumina production, which could be treated economically for its richness in critical metals. Zhang et al. studied both, the dealkalinization and the solubilization of metals (i.e., Al, Ce, and Y), from red mud through sulfur (S0) oxidation as catalyzed by the moderately thermophilic bacterium Sulfobacillus thermosulfidooxidans. The bioleaching process is mediated by biogenic H2SO4. The optimal conditions depend on the S0:red mud mass ratio and aeration to promote S0 bio-oxidation. The authors suggest the reduction of liquid waste by media recirculation or the use of by-products from gas and/or coal desulfurization processes as S0 sources for the bacteria in large-scale industrial applications to reduce the operational costs.

Li et al. investigated a cost-effective alternative for uranium extraction from complex ores. Their research studies the feasibility of sulfur enhancement for uranium bioleaching in column reactors using a designed mixed culture of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans, Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans, and Leptospirillum ferriphilum from a refractory uranium ore. The sulfur enhancement favored the uranium solubilization, which caused a final recovery of 86.2%. The uranium bioleaching kinetics are fitted with internal diffusion through a product layer-controlled model. The sulfur enhancement could strengthen the porosity of the passivation layer and improve the ore permeability. The bacterial community also played a key role, and a controlled balance of the iron-oxidizing bacteria and sulfur-oxidizing bacteria increased the uranium bioleaching process.

Gallium is used in integrated circuits and advanced electronic components because it allows low energy consumption and high computation speed. However, minerals containing gallium are scarce in nature. Nowadays, the demand for this element is high, which is leading to the development of effective recovery processes from secondary resources such as mine tailings or electronic recycling material. Bioleaching was considered an extractive method by Chung et al. The authors obtained genomic sequences of five heterotrophic bacteria, isolated from different Portuguese mines, to identify potential mechanisms involved in bioleaching ability and strategies to overcome metal(loid) toxicity. The presence of effective resistance mechanisms to gallium and arsenic was particularly important for bioleaching Ga from GaAs and GaN.

Spiess et al. have for the first time studied the recovery of Zn from bioleachate using a microbial electrolysis cell. The proposed approach combines bioleaching and bioelectrochemistry to develop a fully biotechnological metal recovery process. During Zn recovery from bioleachate, aluminum precipitation and iron reduction were observed. The energy consumption for Zn recovery using a microbial electrolysis cell was notably lower than electrowinning. After 3 months of operation, the electroactive species Enterococcus was enriched on the anode from sewage sludge.

To sum up, biohydrometallurgy is a promising approach to extracting critical metals from non-conventional sources. In this way, it can contribute to a circular economy. However, more detailed studies are necessary to evaluate the optimization of bioleaching processes for different wastes, scaling up operations for industrial applications, and addressing microbial resistances to target metals. Overcoming these challenges in future is crucial for the successful integration of biohydrometallurgical techniques into recycling processes.

Author contributions

LC: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. RZ: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. JM: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. WS: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Adetunji, A. I., Oberholster, P. J., and Erasmus, M. (2023). Bioleaching of metals from e-waste using microorganisms: a review. Minerals 13, 828. doi: 10.3390/min13060828

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Baniasadi, M., Vakilchap, F., Bahaloo-Horeh, N., Mousavi, S. M., and Farnaud, S. (2019). Advances in bioleaching as a sustainable method for metal recovery from e-waste: a review. J. Indust. Eng. Chem. 76, 75–90. doi: 10.1016/j.jiec.2019.03.047

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Castro, L., Blázquez, M. L., González, F., and Muñoz, J. A. (2020). Bioleaching of phosphate minerals using Aspergillus niger: recovery of copper and rare earth elements. Metals 10, 978. doi: 10.3390/met10070978

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Danouche, M., Bounaga, A., Oulkhir, A., Boulif, R., Zeroual, Y., Benhida, R., et al. (2024). Advances in bio/chemical approaches for sustainable recycling and recovery of rare earth elements from secondary resources. Sci. Total Environm. 912, 168811. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168811

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Hedrich, S., and Schippers, A. (2021). Distribution of scandium in red mud and extraction using Gluconobacter oxydans. Hydrometallurgy 202, 105621. doi: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2021.105621

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ilyas, S., Lee, J.-C., and Chi, R.-A. (2013). Bioleaching of metals from electronic scrap and its potential for commercial exploitation. Hydrometallurgy 131, 138–143. doi: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2012.11.010

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Mohan, S., and Joseph, C. P. (2020). “Biomining: An Innovative and Practical Solution for Reclamation of Open Dumpsite”, in: Recent Developments in Waste Management, ed. A.S. Kalamdhad (Singapore: Springer Singapore), 167–178.

Google Scholar

Moosakazemi, F., Ghassa, S., Jafari, M., and Chelgani, S. C. (2023). Bioleaching for recovery of metals from spent batteries–a review. Mineral Proc. Extract. Metallurg. Rev. 44, 511–521. doi: 10.1080/08827508.2022.2095376

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Schueler, T. A., Schippers, A., and Goldmann, D. (2024). Bioleaching for metals removal from mine tailings flotation fractions. Hydrometallurgy 10, 6286. doi: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2024.106286

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, R., Hedrich, S., Römer, F., Goldmann, D., and Schippers, A. (2020). Bioleaching of cobalt from Cu/Co-rich sulfidic mine tailings from the polymetallic Rammelsberg mine, Germany. Hydrometallurgy 197, 105443. doi: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2020.105443

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: bioleaching, biorecovery, critical raw materials, secondary sources, metal recycling

Citation: Castro L, Zhang R, Muñoz JA and Sand W (2024) Editorial: Bioleaching and biorecovery of critical raw materials from secondary sources. Front. Microbiol. 15:1395820. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1395820

Received: 04 March 2024; Accepted: 27 March 2024;
Published: 10 April 2024.

Edited and reviewed by: David Emerson, Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences, United States

Copyright © 2024 Castro, Zhang, Muñoz and Sand. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Laura Castro, lcastror@ucm.es; Ruiyong Zhang, ruiyong.zhang@qdio.ac.cn

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.