Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol.
Sec. Microbe and Virus Interactions with Plants
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1405090
This article is part of the Research Topic Climate Impact on Plant Holobiont: Mitigation Strategies and Sustainability, Volume II View all 5 articles

Exploring the Potential of Bacillus for Crop Productivity and Sustainable Solution for Combating Rice False Smut Disease

Provisionally accepted
Neha Pandey Neha Pandey 1,2Richa Vaishnav Richa Vaishnav 1Asha S. Rajavat Asha S. Rajavat 1Ravi M. Tripathi Ravi M. Tripathi 3Arvind N. Singh Arvind N. Singh 4Sanjay Kumar Sanjay Kumar 2Madan Kumar Madan Kumar 5Neeraj Shrivastava Neeraj Shrivastava 1*
  • 1 Amity Institute of Microbial Technology, Amity University, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • 2 ICAR-Indian Institute of Seed Science, Maunath bhanjan , Uttar Pradesh, India
  • 3 Amity Institute of Nanotechnology (AINT), Noida, Delhi, India
  • 4 Indian Institute of Vegetable Research (ICAR), Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • 5 Indian Institute of Agricultural Biotechnology (ICAR), Ranchi, Jharkhand, India

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Rice False Smut is caused by the soil-borne fungal pathogen Ustilagonoidea virens (U. virens), which is one of the most threatening diseases in most of the rice growing countries including India, that causes 0.5-75% yield loss, low seed germination and reduction in seed quality. The assessment of yield loss helps to understand the relevance of disease severity and allows appropriate management strategies to be implemented. This study aimed to mitigate biotic stress in rice by employing rhizobacterial based bioformulation which possess multifarious ability as plant growth-promoting and biocontrol potential against U. virens. Rhizobacteria were isolated from the soil of the rice rhizospheres from the healthy plant of false smut affected zone. Further, they were identified as Bacillus strains; B. subtilis (BR_4), B. licheniformis (BU_7), B. licheniformis (BU_8), and B. vallismortis (KU_7) via sequencing. Isolates were screened for their biocontrol potential against U. virens under in-vitro conditions. The antagonistic study revealed B. vallismortis (KU_7) inhibited U. virens the most (44.6%) followed by B. subtilis BR_4 (41.4%), B. licheniformis BU_7 (39.8%) and B. licheniformis BU_8 (43.5%). Various biochemical and plant growth promotional attributes, like phosphate & Zn solubilization, IAA, ammonium, siderophore, and chitinase production, etc. were also checked for all the selected isolates. Further, the potential of the isolates was tested in both in vitro and field conditions employing talc-based bioformulation by bio-priming and the root treatment. Application of bioformulation revealed a 20% decrease in disease incidence in plants treated with B. vallismortis (KU_7), 60.5% increase in the biological yield and a 45% increase in the grain yield. This ecofriendly approach not only suppressed the disease but also improved grain quality and reduced the chaffiness.

    Keywords: Bacillus, biocontrol, Rice false smut, Bioformulation, B. vallismortis, Ustilagonoidea virens, PGPR

    Received: 22 Mar 2024; Accepted: 06 May 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Pandey, Vaishnav, Rajavat, Tripathi, Singh, Kumar, Kumar and Shrivastava. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Neeraj Shrivastava, Amity Institute of Microbial Technology, Amity University, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.