Sec. Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Brain-aging
Volume 12 - 2020 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2020.00080
Brain Microvascular Pericytes in Vascular Cognitive Impairment and Dementia
- 1Institute on Aging and Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
- 2JSPS Overseas Research Fellowship Program, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Tokyo, Japan
- 3Department of Neurology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
- 4Department of Neurology, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Japan
Pericytes are unique, multi-functional mural cells localized at the abluminal side of the perivascular space in microvessels. Originally discovered in 19th century, pericytes had drawn less attention until decades ago mainly due to lack of specific markers. Recently, however, a growing body of evidence has revealed that pericytes play various important roles: development and maintenance of blood–brain barrier (BBB), regulation of the neurovascular system (e.g., vascular stability, vessel formation, cerebral blood flow, etc.), trafficking of inflammatory cells, clearance of toxic waste products from the brain, and acquisition of stem cell-like properties. In the neurovascular unit, pericytes perform these functions through coordinated crosstalk with neighboring cells including endothelial, glial, and neuronal cells. Dysfunction of pericytes contribute to a wide variety of diseases that lead to cognitive impairments such as cerebral small vessel disease (SVD), acute stroke, Alzheimer’s disease (AD), and other neurological disorders. For instance, in SVDs, pericyte degeneration leads to microvessel instability and demyelination while in stroke, pericyte constriction after ischemia causes a no-reflow phenomenon in brain capillaries. In AD, which shares some common risk factors with vascular dementia, reduction in pericyte coverage and subsequent microvascular impairments are observed in association with white matter attenuation and contribute to impaired cognition. Pericyte loss causes BBB-breakdown, which stagnates amyloid β clearance and the leakage of neurotoxic molecules into the brain parenchyma. In this review, we first summarize the characteristics of brain microvessel pericytes, and their roles in the central nervous system. Then, we focus on how dysfunctional pericytes contribute to the pathogenesis of vascular cognitive impairment including cerebral ‘small vessel’ and ‘large vessel’ diseases, as well as AD. Finally, we discuss therapeutic implications for these disorders by targeting pericytes.
Pericytes are mural cells, embedded within the basement membrane, and surrounding microvessels as illustrated in Figures 1 and 2. These cells were originally described in late 19th century (Eberth, 1871; Rouget, 1873) and initially named “pericytes” in 1923 by Zimmermann (Zimmermann, 1923) in accordance with their location enveloping the endothelium, and their being embedded in the basement membrane outside the microvessels (Zimmermann, 1923; Armulik et al., 2011; Geranmayeh et al., 2019). Although pericytes were considered to contribute to architectural maintenance and contraction of capillaries (Sandison, 1931; Zweifach, 1934; Clark and Clart, 1940), little had been known about their multifunctional characteristics and roles in neurological disorders until late 20th century (Brown et al., 2019). In the last 20 years, however, using a combination of markers and advancing technologies, a variety of functions of pericytes in health and disease have been revealed. Especially, microvascular pericytes in the central nervous system (CNS) have come into focus as they contribute to the maintenance of blood–brain barrier (BBB) (Armulik et al., 2010; Bell et al., 2010; Daneman et al., 2010; Quaegebeur et al., 2010), regulation of cerebral blood flow (CBF) (Peppiatt et al., 2006), and clearance of toxic waste products from the brain (Lendahl et al., 2019) as well as other multifunctional properties.
Figure 1. Brain vessels and mural cells. The pial arterioles branch from pial arteries which follow the outer rim of the brain via the meninges. The arterioles penetrate perpendicularly into the brain parenchyma (penetrating arteries) and further split into smaller arterioles. As their diameters and constituent cell types are changed, the vessels make a transition to capillaries. The capillary join to form venules that collect into pial venules and further into pial veins. In the small vessels, there are two types of mural cells separately located outside of endothelial layer: vascular smooth muscle cells (SMCs) and pericytes. SMCs are localized at the arteries, arterioles, venules and veins whereas pericytes are localized at the capillaries and post-capillary venules. The proximal branches coming off penetrating arterioles are sometimes called as pre-capillary arterioles. The subtypes of pericytes are differently called: ensheathing pericytes, transitional pericytes, pre-capillary pericytes, smooth muscle cell-pericyte hybrids, arteriole SMC (aaSMCs), or pre-capillary SMCs in a few branches from arterioles; capillary pericytes, mesh pericytes, thin-strand pericytes, helical pericytes, or mid-capillary pericytes in the middle part of capillary; mesh pericytes, stellate/stellate-like pericytes, or post-capillary pericytes in the post-capillary venules.
Figure 2. Constituents of the BBB in the capillary. In the BBB, tight junctions created by endothelial cells strictly regulate the movement of ions, molecules, and cells between the blood and the brain. The tight junctions are controlled by the cells surrounding the endothelium, including pericytes, astrocytes, perivascular OPCs, interneurons, perivascular macrophages, and microglia. Pericytes are localized on the abluminal surface of the endothelial layers and embedded in the basement membrane. Astrocytes extend polarized cellular processes that almost completely ensheath the vessel tubes.
Mural Cells in the Brain Small Vessels: Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells and Pericytes
The brain constitutes ∼2% of the adult human body weight but receives ∼20% of the cardiac output through CNS vascular network (Xing et al., 2017). In the brain, small vessels can be largely classified as three different types by their size and constituent cell types: (1) arterioles, (2) capillaries, and (3) venules (Attwell et al., 2016). There are gradual transitions between these vessel types; the transitions between arterioles and capillaries are called as pre-capillary arterioles while those between capillaries and venules are called as post-capillary venules (Dalkara and Alarcon-Martinez, 2015).
The arterioles branch from large arteries and follow the outer rim of the brain via the meninges (Bevan et al., 1999; Onodera, 2011). They penetrate perpendicularly into the cortex (penetrating arterioles), and upon entering the white matter, they begin to coil, loop, and spiral (Nonaka et al., 2003). Running through the brain parenchyma, the arterioles further split into smaller arterioles (Yamazaki and Kanekiyo, 2017). As their diameters and constituent cell types are changed, the vessels make a transition to capillaries. The capillaries then increase their diameter again and transition into the post-capillary venules, which join to form collecting venules that collect into larger veins (Landau and Davis, 1957; Harnarine-Singh et al., 1972; Onodera, 2011; Itoh and Suzuki, 2012; El-Bouri and Payne, 2016). In the small vessels (from the arterioles to venules), there are two types of mural cells separately located outside of endothelial layer: (1) vascular smooth muscle cells (SMCs) and (2) pericytes (Figure 1).
Smooth muscle cells and pericytes express shared mural cell markers including neuron-glial antigen 2 (NG2, or transmembrane chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan; CSPG4) platelet derived growth factor receptor beta (PDGFRβ), alanyl aminopeptidase (ANPEP, or CD13), vimentin, regulator of G protein signaling 5 (RGS5) (Itoh and Suzuki, 2012; Yang et al., 2017; Smyth L. et al., 2018; Vanlandewijck et al., 2018). Other mural cell markers such as α-smooth muscle actin (αSMA, or actin alpha 2, smooth muscle; ACTA2), transgelin (or smooth muscle protein 22-α; SM22α), calponin1 (CNN1), desmin, and melanoma cell adhesion molecule (MCAM, or CD146) are expressed more in SMCs than pericytes (Smyth L. et al., 2018; Zeisel et al., 2018). On the other hand, pericytes, but not SMCs, express ATP binding cassette subfamily C member 9 (ABCC9) (Bondjers et al., 2006) and preferentially internalize or take up the fluoroNissl dye NeuroTrace 500/525 when applied to the brain surface (Damisah et al., 2017). Most of the gene expression of pericytes, however, overlaps between SMCs and a certain subtype of pericytes. Furthermore, the expression of all these markers changes during growth and development, and may be up- or down-regulated in pathological conditions (Hughes and Chan-Ling, 2004; Armulik et al., 2011). Therefore, cell morphology and anatomical position should be taken into consideration to distinguish SMCs and pericytes. Table 1 provides anatomical differences in the cerebral small vessels and mural cell markers.
The classification of small vessels is sometimes complicated and controversial because of the definition of constituent mural cells. Although there is a consensus that SMCs are located in arterioles and venules as well as larger arteries and veins (Iadecola, 2017; Sweeney et al., 2018), the classification and nomenclature of pericyte-surrounding vessels have been greatly debated mainly due to the heterogeneity of pericytes (Cheng et al., 2018). Pericytes in the capillaries gradually transition to SMCs in the arterioles; drawing a clear line between those vessels is quite difficult (Zimmermann, 1923). Originally, Zimmermann defined pericytes including their transition form to SMCs, residing on the three consecutive vessels, namely, (1) pre-capillary arterioles, (2) capillaries, and (3) post-capillary venules (Zimmermann, 1923). Zimmermann therefore differently named the pericytes on each vessel: (1) pre-capillary pericytes, at the last arterial ends that merge into the capillary system; (2) capillary pericytes, at the capillaries in the narrowest sense; and (3) post-capillary pericytes, on post-capillary venules up to veins showing regular, fusiform smooth muscle fibers.
As techniques such as three-dimensional live imaging have been developed, the branching order coming off penetrating arterioles has also been taken into consideration to define the vessels in rodent brains. The definition of the vessels, however, has varied depending on the studies. While some studies have defined all vessels including proximal and distal branches coming off penetrating arterioles as capillaries (Peppiatt et al., 2006; Hall et al., 2014; Cai et al., 2018; Khennouf et al., 2018; Grubb et al., 2020), others have defined proximal branches as pre-capillary arterioles (Fernández-Klett et al., 2010; Hartmann et al., 2015; Hill et al., 2015). To make matters more complicated, Hill et al. (2015), have asserted that the mural cells on the proximal branches coming off arterioles should be called as SMCs, which have provided confusion in the field with the result that different members of the field use different terminologies and definitions about pericytes and pericyte-residing vessels (Hartmann et al., 2015; He L. et al., 2016; Kisler et al., 2017a; Yang et al., 2017; Smyth L. et al., 2018; Dalkara, 2019; Grant et al., 2019). Nowadays, to avoid confusion, the researchers have claimed that the capillaries should include transition to the arterioles, and the mural cells on those capillaries should be called as “pericytes” (Attwell et al., 2016). In this review, we will describe the differences of mural cells in the small vessels, namely, (1) SMCs on the arterioles and venules and (2) pericytes on the capillaries and post-capillary venules, introducing the different terminology of pericytes. Thereafter, we will focus on the pericyte function and dysfunction in health and diseases.
In the arterioles, SMCs continuously enwrap the abluminal side of endothelial cell layer and make myoendothelial gap junction (Aydin et al., 1991). The SMCs in the arterioles have an inconspicuous soma and extend broad processes (Attwell et al., 2016) that strongly express αSMA transgelin, desmin, CD146, and CNN1 as well as shared mural cell markers including NG2, PDGFRβ, CD13, vimentin, and RGS5. Outside of the SMCs is perivascular space with fibroblast-like cells, surrounded by collagen layer and endfeet of astrocytes (Mastorakos and McGavern, 2019).
In the capillaries, the vessel size further decreases, and the endothelial layer is intermittently surrounded by pericytes. Compared to the peripheral vascular beds, CNS capillaries have higher pericyte-to-endothelial cell ratios (1:1 to 1:3) and around 70–80% of the capillary surface area is covered with pericyte cell processes (Bell et al., 2010; Winkler et al., 2010, 2014). Capillary pericytes have a conspicuous protruding ovoid cell body with long thin processes that course along the capillary for longer distances and are embedded within the basement membrane.
The role of capillary pericytes in CBF control has long been debated. Using mouse models, some researchers have reported that arteriolar SMCs but not capillary pericytes regulate CBF in response to neuronal activities or ischemic stress (Fernández-Klett et al., 2010; Hill et al., 2015). Others, however, have shown that capillary pericytes also change the vessel diameter and CBF by stimuli, neuronal activation, or ischemia (Peppiatt et al., 2006; Yemisci et al., 2009; Hall et al., 2014; Pieper et al., 2014; Kisler et al., 2017b; Rungta et al., 2018), suggesting capillary pericytes also contribute to CBF regulation.
Because pericytes are morphologically and functionally heterogeneous, pericytes are sometimes subclassified according to their topology, morphology, and the protein expression levels.
Pericytes in the Proximal Capillaries
The studies of mouse brain cortices using two-photon microscopy have revealed the morphological and functional distinction of the pericytes on the proximal branches (mostly up to 2nd or 4th order) coming off penetrating arterioles from those on the higher branch-order capillaries or larger arterioles (Hartmann et al., 2015; Hill et al., 2015; Kisler et al., 2017a; Yang et al., 2017; Smyth L. et al., 2018; Grant et al., 2019). The pericytes located in this point of transition possess highly visible and protruding ovoid soma with thin and circumferential processes enveloping the vessels. These cells express more αSMA than pericytes in mid-capillaries, but not as much as SMCs in the penetrating arterioles (Alarcon-Martinez et al., 2018; Grant et al., 2019). Aside from αSMA, the cells also express desmin and transgelin, but hardly express CNN1 (Smyth L. et al., 2018; Vanlandewijck et al., 2018).
Because these pericytes are positioned at the transition between arterioles and capillaries, and have shared some characteristics with SMCs, the terminology and classification of these mural cells have been hotly debated. The cells have been variably called as ensheathing pericytes (Smyth L. et al., 2018; Grant et al., 2019), transition/transitional pericytes (Kisler et al., 2017a; Arango-Lievano et al., 2018), pre-capillary pericytes (Zimmermann, 1923), simply ‘pericytes’ or ‘capillary pericytes’ (Hall et al., 2014; Attwell et al., 2016; Cai et al., 2018; Khennouf et al., 2018; Grubb et al., 2020), smooth muscle-pericyte hybrids (Hartmann et al., 2015; Yang et al., 2017; Dalkara, 2019), arteriole SMC (aaSMC) (Vanlandewijck et al., 2018), or pre-capillary SMCs (Hill et al., 2015).
At the same time, the vessels of proximal branches coming off penetrating arterioles are also differently defined as pre-capillary arterioles (Fernández-Klett et al., 2010; Hartmann et al., 2015; Hill et al., 2015; Berthiaume et al., 2018; Erdener and Dalkara, 2019; Grant et al., 2019), post-arteriole capillaries (Gould et al., 2016) or a part of capillaries (Hall et al., 2014; Attwell et al., 2016; Cai et al., 2018; Khennouf et al., 2018; Grubb et al., 2020).
The cells in this proximal branches (especially, 1st to 2nd branches) coming off arterioles has drawn attention as they highly contribute to neurovascular coupling (NVC) (Hall et al., 2014; Hill et al., 2015; Cai et al., 2018; Khennouf et al., 2018; Rungta et al., 2018; Grubb et al., 2020) and no-reflow phenomenon after acute ischemia (Hall et al., 2014; Hill et al., 2015). Although referring to these mural cells as a subtype of “pericytes” has become almost a consensus, the shifting nomenclature of these cells and vessels has been the root of recent controversies on pericyte roles as regulators of CBF (discussed below).
Pericytes in the Mid-Capillaries
In the mouse brain, pericytes in the mid-capillaries are divided into two subtypes according to the morphology of their processes, namely, (1) mesh pericyte and (2) thin-strand pericyte or helical pericyte (Hartmann et al., 2015; Yang et al., 2017; Smyth L. et al., 2018; Dalkara, 2019; Grant et al., 2019). The mesh pericytes adopt a mesh-like appearance and are located on the proximal side of a capillary with higher coverage area than thin-strand pericytes (Hartmann et al., 2015; Grant et al., 2019). The thin-strand pericytes or helical pericytes extend thin, meandering processes that run along the vessel lumen. These two types of pericytes express NG2, CD13, and PDGFRβ, and slightly express CD146 and αSMA, but hardly express desmin, transgelin, nor CNN1 (Alarcon-Martinez et al., 2018; Smyth L. et al., 2018; Vanlandewijck et al., 2018; Zeisel et al., 2018). Instead, pericytes express ABCC9 (Bondjers et al., 2006; Vanlandewijck et al., 2018) and preferentially take up the fluoroNissl dye NeuroTrace 500/525 (Damisah et al., 2017). The pericytes in these capillaries play vital roles for BBB maintenance and small molecule transport (Armulik et al., 2010; Bell et al., 2010; Liu et al., 2012).
In the post-capillary venules, different shaped mesh pericytes, also called stellate/stellate-shaped pericytes, surround the endothelial layer. These cells have many slender and shorter branching processes than capillary pericytes (Hashitani and Lang, 2016; Yang et al., 2017; Arango-Lievano et al., 2018). They express αSMA, ABCC9, cysteine sulfinic acid decarboxylase (P-selectin), and endomucin (Marín-Padilla, 2012). The expression level of αSMA is lower than the mural cells in the arterioles and proximal capillaries (Grant et al., 2019). The pericytes in the post-capillary venules are thought to regulate immune cell entry to the brain parenchyma like those in other tissues (Proebstl et al., 2012; Stark et al., 2013; Attwell et al., 2016; Dalkara, 2019; Rudziak et al., 2019). Outside of the pericytes are astroglial end-feet forming glia limitans. Between the endothelial basement membrane and astrocytic basement membrane is perivascular space, where antigen presenting cells reside (Engelhardt et al., 2017; Mastorakos and McGavern, 2019). Fibroblast-like cells are within the astrocytic basement membrane (Mastorakos and McGavern, 2019).
Post-capillary venules are collected to form ascending venules. In the venules, the endothelial cell layer is surrounded by stellate-shaped SMCs with broad leaf-like processes (Ushiwata and Ushiki, 1990; Armulik et al., 2011). Venous SMCs express NG2, CD13, PDGFRβ, αSMA, transgelin, ABCC9, but not CNN1 (Vanlandewijck et al., 2018). And the expression level of αSMA and transgelin in the venous SMCs is lower than the mural cells in the arterioles (Vanlandewijck et al., 2018; Grant et al., 2019). SMCs in brain venules express NG2, which is different from the venules of peripheral tissues (Murfee et al., 2005; Stark et al., 2013). Outside of SMCs are perivascular space and fibroblast-like cells (Mastorakos and McGavern, 2019).
Functions of Pericytes
BBB Maintenance, Angiogenesis, and Vessel Stabilizing
The CNS vascular system possess a highly selective semipermeable border formed by the BBB wherein tight junctions and adherens junctions created by endothelial cells strictly regulate the movement of ions, molecules, and circulating cells between the blood and the brain (Luissint et al., 2012; Daneman and Prat, 2015). The tight and adherens junctions are controlled by various types of cells surrounding the endothelium, such as pericytes, astrocytes, perivascular oligodendrocyte precursor cells (OPCs), interneurons, perivascular macrophages, microglia, and other immune cells (Abbott et al., 2010; Seo et al., 2014; Faraco et al., 2017; Stebbins et al., 2019) (Figure 2).
Capillary pericytes play especially crucial roles in the function of the BBB. Pericyte ablation leads to breakdown of the BBB in the mouse brain (Nikolakopoulou et al., 2019). Pericytes control protein expression in the tight junctions, their alignment with endothelial cells, and the bulk-flow transcytosis of fluid-filled vesicles across the BBB (Armulik et al., 2010; Bell et al., 2010; Daneman et al., 2010; Quaegebeur et al., 2010).
Pericytes also play a key role in the generation of new blood vessels. During angiogenesis, a complex web of bidirectional signaling pathways between endothelial cells and pericytes is essential for forming and stabilizing new blood vessels (Gaengel et al., 2009; Stapor et al., 2014). The signaling molecules involved in these processes include platelet-derived growth factor B (PDGFB)/PDGF receptor beta (PDGFRβ), transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ), Notch, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), sphingosine-1 phosphate (S1P)/S1P receptor 1 (S1PR1 or EDG), and angiopoietin 1 and 2 (ANGPT1, ANGPT2)/TEK receptor tyrosine kinase (TEK, or TIE2) all of which differentially contribute to these signaling activities (Liu et al., 2000; Winkler et al., 2011b; Zechariah et al., 2013; Eilken et al., 2017; Teichert et al., 2017; Cheng et al., 2018). During angiogenesis, pericytes are reported to be recruited from the bone marrow as well as brain parenchyma in response to the PDGF-BB secreted from endothelial cells (Rajantie et al., 2004; Song et al., 2005; Kokovay et al., 2006; Gaengel et al., 2009). On the other hand, pericytes induce endothelial cell sprouting and stabilization via secreting TGFβ, VEGF, and ANGPT1 (Paik et al., 2004; Durham et al., 2014; Teichert et al., 2017; Blocki et al., 2018). Lack of pericytes leads to endothelial hyperplasia and abnormal vascular morphogenesis including microaneurysm (Lindahl et al., 1997; Hellström et al., 2001). When a single brain pericyte is ablated, the processes from neighboring pericytes are extended to contact uncovered regions of the endothelial cells and maintain the vessel diameter and vessel stability (Berthiaume et al., 2018).
Regulation of Capillary Diameter and Blood Flow
Cerebral blood flow is dynamically altered in response to changes of transient neuronal activity, which is referred to as NVC (Abbott et al., 2010; Attwell et al., 2010; Kisler et al., 2017a). It is controlled by the cells within the neurovascular unit (NVU) including endothelial cells, pericytes, SMCs, astrocytes, OPCs, and neurons (Peppiatt et al., 2006; Attwell et al., 2010; Hall et al., 2014; Mishra et al., 2016; Kisler et al., 2017a, b; Rungta et al., 2018). In response to the different neurotransmitters, pericytes dilate capillaries and increase local CBF (Hamilton et al., 2010). In pathological conditions such as ischemic stroke (Hall et al., 2014; Yemisci et al., 2009) and AD (Nortley et al., 2019), brain capillaries are constricted by pericytes. In ischemic stroke mouse brains, damaged and dead pericytes squeeze the capillaries and sustain the reduction of CBF even after recanalization of the larger vessels, causing the no-reflow phenomenon (Yemisci et al., 2009; Kloner et al., 2018). The burden of amyloid beta (Aβ) oligomer causes pericyte contraction and capillary stenosis, which decreases CBF in the AD brains (Nortley et al., 2019).
The role of pericytes in regulation of vessel diameter has been heatedly debated. When Rouget first describe the branched cells on the capillary wall, which is nowadays called as pericytes, he regarded them as contractile cells (Rouget, 1873). Thereafter, the studies which supported or objected to the pericyte contractility were successively reported (Krueger and Bechmann, 2010). In terms of CBF regulation, SMCs located at arterioles were traditionally thought to control CBF (Iadecola, 2004). This view of CBF dynamics was revolutionized by the findings that capillary diameter also changes with neural activity (Peppiatt et al., 2006; Hall et al., 2014; Kisler et al., 2017b; Khennouf et al., 2018; Rungta et al., 2018) and ischemia (Yemisci et al., 2009; Hall et al., 2014). Furthermore, the loss of pericytes has been reported to lead to diminishing CBF in response to functional hyperemia in pericytes-deficient mice (Bell et al., 2010; Kisler et al., 2017b, 2020). However, Hill et al. (2015) refuted that pericytes are involved in the regulation of CBF, and put forward the view that arteriolar SMCs may be the key players regulating CBF. Fernández-Klett et al. (2010) also showed pre-capillary and penetrating arterioles, but not pericyte in capillaries are responsible for the CBF increase induced by neural activity. These controversial reports most likely stem from the different definitions of pericytes in the proximal capillaries. Some of these reports concur that the mural cells in the proximal branches coming off penetrating arterioles respond to the stimulations outlined above and change vessel diameters accordingly (Fernández-Klett et al., 2010; Hall et al., 2014; Hill et al., 2015; Cai et al., 2018; Khennouf et al., 2018). Pericytes residing at the proximal capillaries possess both characteristics of pericytes and SMCs (Hartmann et al., 2015), which may lead to discrepant interpretations by different investigators. Some groups showed stimulation-evoked increases in synaptic activity and capillary dilation starting mostly at the first- or second-order capillary then propagating along arterioles and downstream capillaries (Cai et al., 2018; Khennouf et al., 2018), which may position the pericytes in the proximal capillaries as the major regulators of CBF. In addition, Grubb et al. (2020) reported that a pre-capillary sphincter, at the junction between the penetrating arteriole and first order branch, modulated capillary flow while protecting the downstream capillary bed from adverse pressure fluctuations. Taken together, the proximal branches coming off arterioles seem to be the gatekeeper that controls CBF in the capillary beds.
Clearance of Materials From the Brain
Pericytes internalize small molecules and neurotoxic blood-derived products which enter the breached BBB (i.e., immunoglobulins, fibrin and albumin) through receptor-mediated endocytosis or non-specific pinocytosis (Armulik et al., 2010; Bell et al., 2010; Schultz et al., 2017). Pericytes also internalize large solid substance through phagocytosis. Engulfed molecules are transported to lysosomes for enzymatic degradation (Diaz-Flores et al., 2009) or possibly transported to the blood circulation (Zhao et al., 2015). While tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) and interferon-γ (IFNγ) enhance phagocytic uptake, TGFB1 attenuates phagocytic uptake in pericytes.
Pericytes may clear substances derived from the brain parenchyma as well as around vessels. Pericyte loss aggravates Aβ deposition in transgenic mice (Sagare et al., 2013). Aβ clearance by pericytes is mainly performed through receptor-mediated endocytic pathways, especially low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 (LRP-1) (Shibata et al., 2000; Zlokovic et al., 2010; Ma et al., 2018).
Another clearance system which might be related to pericytes is the CNS lymphatic drainage system. In the CNS, there are two major extracellular fluids, namely, (1) cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and (2) interstitial fluid (ISF). CSF drains to cervical lymph nodes via the cribriform plate and nasal lymphatics (Kida et al., 1993; Spector et al., 2015), as well as via dural lymphatics (Aspelund et al., 2015; Louveau et al., 2015; Absinta et al., 2017; Ahn et al., 2019) and along cranial nerves (Hatterer et al., 2006; Aspelund et al., 2015). ISF containing metabolic products of the brain as well as Aβ and tau drains to lymph nodes by the shared or distinct pathways from CSF (Engelhardt et al., 2017; Cheng and Wang, 2020). Two different pathways for draining ISF to the periphery — the perivascular and paravascular pathways — are controversially proposed (Engelhardt et al., 2016). In the perivascular pathway, ISF and solutes from CNS parenchyma enter the basement membranes of capillaries, where pericytes are embedded, and drain directly via tunica media of arterioles and arteries out of the brain to cervical lymph nodes (Carare et al., 2008, 2014; Engelhardt et al., 2016). Paravascular pathway, also known as glymphatic system, denotes the moving of CSF into the brain along arterial perivascular spaces and successively into the interstitium to mix with ISF, which then guides flow toward the venous perivascular spaces, removing metabolic waste of ISF to the CSF via convective bulk flow (Iliff et al., 2012). In the glymphatic system, astrocytes are important for ion buffering and fluid exchange between the CSF and ISF (Jessen et al., 2015). The exchange through the glymphatic system is suggested to be dependent on the water channel aquaporin-4 (AQP4) located in astrocytic endfeet (Iliff et al., 2012). However, it remains enigmatic whether or not AQP4 is solely responsible for this fluid transport or not (Lendahl et al., 2019). Recently, insufficient PDGFB signaling in the Pdgfbret/ret mice has shown decreased pericyte coverage of the vessels with decreased AQP4 polarization to astrocyte endfeet, which impairs maturation of the glymphatic function (Munk et al., 2019). The focal absence of pericytes correlates with relocation of AQP4 from astrocytic endfeet to the soma of astrocytes (Armulik et al., 2010). Pericytes express laminin-α2 (LAMA2), laminin-β1, and laminin-γ1, which encode the subunits of laminin 211 (Vanlandewijck et al., 2018). Laminin 211 deposits in the vascular basement membrane and interacts with dystrophin in astrocytes, which acts as a molecular bridge to AQP4 to keep it in the astrocyte endfeet (Guadagno and Moukhles, 2004). Indeed, Lama2 knockout in mice results in BBB abnormalities in association with loss of AQP4 polarization to astrocyte endfeet (Menezes et al., 2014). The above referenced reports suggest that pericytes might influence the development of the glymphatic system through deposition of laminin 211 in the vascular basement membrane, which maintains the polarization of AQP4 at astrocytic endfeet. However, there are critical assessments of the proposed glymphatic system (Hladky and Barrand, 2014, 2019; Abbott et al., 2018). Several observations or simulations do not support the glymphatic mechanism (Jin et al., 2016; Smith et al., 2017) nor convective fluid flow of CSF (Asgari et al., 2016; Holter et al., 2017). Hence, the existence of the paravascular pathway as a CNS drainage system is still under debate.
Inflammation and the Regulation of Immune Cells
Brain pericytes have many properties of immune regulating cells such as (1) responding to and expressing pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory molecules, (2) regulating leukocyte extravasation and trafficking, and (3) controlling immune cell activation including T cells, macrophages, and microglia (Rustenhoven et al., 2017; Thomas et al., 2017; Duan et al., 2018; Smyth L.C.D. et al., 2018). In the mouse brain, pericytes function as the initial sensor of systemic inflammation and relay the infection signal to neurons by secreting chemokine CC chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2, also known as monocyte chemotactic protein-1, MCP1) (Duan et al., 2018).
Pericytes express and release several mediator molecules that enhance leukocyte extravasation. Although the endothelial cells are well known to induce leukocyte crawling and extravasation (Muller, 2002), pericytes also contribute to leukocyte transmigration (Proebstl et al., 2012). In vivo observation of mouse skin vessels have demonstrated that leukocyte extravasation occur only post-capillary venular pericytes (Stark et al., 2013). After inflammation stimuli, neutrophils exhibited transendothelial migration (TEM) and sub-endothelial cell crawling along pericyte processes, which was supported by pericyte-derived intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) and its leukocyte integrin ligands, macrophage-1 antigen (Mac-1) and lymphocyte function–associated antigen-1 (LFA-1). Then, the leukocytes transmigrated to the interstitium through the gaps between adjacent pericytes (Proebstl et al., 2012). After extravasation, the leukocytes interact with capillary pericytes as well. Pericyte-monocyte interaction is mediated mainly by macrophage migration-inhibitory factor (MIF) and CCL2, whereas neutrophil migration involves MIF and C-X3-C motif chemokine ligand 1 (CXCL8, also known as interleukin 8, IL8) (Stark et al., 2013).
Exposure of pericytes to cytokines such as interleukin 1 beta (IL1β) and TNFα triggers the release of inflammatory molecules and matrix metalloprotease 9 (MMP9), leading to BBB breakdown in vitro (Herland et al., 2016). The immunomodulatory factors secreted by pericytes including IL1β, TNFα, IFNγ, and interleukin 6 (IL6) induce a proinflammatory state in astrocytes, microglia, and endothelial cells, and cause apoptotic neuronal death (Kovac et al., 2011; Matsumoto et al., 2018).
Conversely, pericytes can also secrete several anti-inflammatory substances such as interleukin 33 (IL33) and C-X3-C motif chemokine ligand 1 (CX3CL1) (Rustenhoven et al., 2016, 2017; Yang et al., 2016), both of which are shown to promote anti-inflammatory microglial phenotype in mouse models (Cardona et al., 2006; Fu et al., 2016). Furthermore, depletion of pericytes induced inflammatory responses in endothelial cells and perivascular infiltration of macrophages in mouse retinal vessels, suggesting pericytes exerts an anti-inflammatory effect on endothelial cells under normal conditions (Ogura et al., 2017).
Pericytes display some similarities to mesenchymal stem cells (Wong et al., 2015). Responding to the stimuli and environmental changes, pericytes may transform into multipotent stem cells and differentiate into various cells including neural, vascular, and glial cells (Dore-Duffy et al., 2006; Nakagomi et al., 2015b; Pombero et al., 2016). Pericytes extracted from ischemic mouse brain and human brain pericytes under oxygen-glucose deprivation states develop stem properties in vitro (Nakagomi et al., 2015a). Pericytes under ischemic condition in vivo and in vitro are also reported to acquire a microglial phenotype corresponding with increased phagocytic property (Özen et al., 2014; Sakuma et al., 2016).
These phenotype changes of pericytes under stimulation can be beneficial for the compensatory remodeling after brain injury and ischemia, rapid response to infection and inflammation, and clearing compromised cells or neurotoxic substances breaching an impaired BBB. However, no multipotency of pericytes in aging and injury in vivo has been reported, challenging the current view of pericytes as tissue-resident multipotent progenitors (Guimaraes-Camboa et al., 2017).
Central nervous system injury evokes the recruitment of astroglia and scar formation. Pericytes and OPCs as well as astrocytes are observed within glial scars. After spinal injury or ischemic stroke, pericytes proliferate and migrate to the injured region and form a glial scar (Göritz et al., 2011; Makihara et al., 2015; Dias et al., 2018; Hesp et al., 2018). Extracellular matrix proteins, such as periostin have shown to be expressed in the extracellular space of the injury region, which induces pericyte proliferation and leads to scar formation (Yokota et al., 2017). The glial scar around the injury site forms a barrier between the injured and the non-injured tissue to prevent further neuronal loss, which eventually hinders the axonal regeneration in the scarred area (Zhu et al., 2015; Anderson et al., 2016; Cheng et al., 2018; Dias et al., 2018). Recent evidence has demonstrated that the glial scar can also promote CNS regeneration after injury (Anderson et al., 2016), suggesting a dual function. The complexity and heterogeneity of the glial scar derived from different cell types (i.e., astrocytes, pericytes, and OPCs) at various phases in CNS diseases remains to be elucidated.
Cross Talk of Pericytes With Vascular Cells and Glia
Endothelial Cells and Pericytes
Pericytes and endothelial cells are connected to a shared basement membrane by several types of integrin molecules. In areas lacking the basement membrane, interdigitations of pericytes and endothelial cell membranes, called peg and socket contacts, form direct connections by N-cadherin and connexin 43 (Armulik et al., 2005; Winkler et al., 2011b). The crosstalk between pericytes and endothelial cells is indispensable for angiogenesis, vascular stability, and BBB formation. For CNS pericytes and endothelial cells, PDGFB/PDGFRβ, TGFβ, Notch, VEGF, and S1P/S1PR1 signaling events are well investigated (Darland et al., 2003; Paik et al., 2004; Gaengel et al., 2009; Walshe et al., 2009; Liu et al., 2010; Li et al., 2011). ANGPT signaling is investigated in the retinal endothelial cells and pericytes (Winkler et al., 2011b).
In the angiogenesis of the mouse brain, PDGF-BB secreted by endothelial cells recruits PDGFRβ-positive pericytes and progenitor cells (Tallquist et al., 2003; Gaengel et al., 2009). PDGFB signaling also stimulates pericyte proliferation (Geranmayeh et al., 2019), and sustained PDGF-BB–PDGFRβ signaling in the adult CNS is required for pericyte cell survival (Geraldes et al., 2009; Bell et al., 2010).
TGFβ signaling is vital for microvessel stability affecting both endothelial cells and pericytes. Endothelially secreted TGFβ regulates differentiation of pericyte progenitors (Ribatti et al., 2011) and induces pericyte contractile protein expression and extracellular matrix production and facilitates proper pericyte attachment in coordination with Notch signaling (Li et al., 2011; Winkler et al., 2011a). Pericyte-derived TGFβ contributes to endothelial maturation through SMAD signaling (Winkler et al., 2011b).
Vascular endothelial growth factor produced by pericytes and endothelial cells also shows reciprocal interaction (Sweeney et al., 2016). Pericyte-derived VEGF in the mouse brain promotes endothelial sprouting and cell survival (Franco et al., 2011; Eilken et al., 2017). VEGF treatment enhances pericyte coverage of brain endothelial cells with increased N-cadherin production (Zechariah et al., 2013). VEGF induces proliferation and migration of pericytes as well as endothelial cell stabilization (Darland et al., 2003).
S1P is originally described as secreted by endothelial cells. Its receptor, S1PR1 is expressed in mural cells including pericytes. S1P secreted by endothelial cells is essential for pericytes coverage in the mouse brain (Allende et al., 2003) and stabilizes endothelial/pericyte cell adhesion through N-cadherin (Paik et al., 2004; Gaengel et al., 2009) and maintains the BBB (Yanagida et al., 2017). Human pericytes secrete S1P, which induces the expression of adhesion proteins in human retinal endothelial cells in vitro (McGuire et al., 2011).
ANGPT1 and ANGPT2 differently contribute to angiogenesis. The ANGPT1 is mainly expressed in pericytes and ANGPT2 is mainly expressed in endothelial cells. The ligand of ANGPT, TEK is mainly expressed in endothelial cells (Sundberg et al., 2002). Pericyte-derived ANGPT1 activates endothelial TEK and promotes endothelial survival (Geevarghese and Herman, 2014). TEK is also expressed at lower levels by pericytes and its downstream signaling in pericytes is essential for angiogenesis (Teichert et al., 2017). In angiogenesis, ANGPT2 was thought to antagonize ANGPT1, but later was found to act as both agonist/antagonist of TEK signaling in the endothelium (Yuan et al., 2009; Akwii et al., 2019). ANGPT2 expressed by mouse endothelial cells leads to the dissociation of TEK expressing pericytes from vessels, which initiates endothelial cell sprouting (Armulik et al., 2005).
Crosstalk between pericytes and endothelial cells is also mediated by circular RNA. Diabetes-related stress up-regulates a circular RNA, cPWWP2A (PWWP domain containing 2A) expression in pericytes, which inhibit microRNA-579 and regulate vascular integrity (Liu C. et al., 2019).
Astrocytes and Pericytes
The crosstalk between pericytes and astrocytes contributes to BBB maintenance, NVC, and white matter attenuation under chronic hypoperfusion (Bonkowski et al., 2011).
Pericytes facilitate the attachment of astrocyte endfeet to the BBB (Ihara and Yamamoto, 2016; Geranmayeh et al., 2019) and pericyte-deficient mice lose AQP4 in the endfeet of astrocytes (Armulik et al., 2010). On the other hand, astrocytes control pericyte migration, differentiation, and the juxtaposition of pericytes to endothelial cells (Nakagawa et al., 2009; Yao et al., 2014). Astrocyte-derived apolipoproteins differently regulate cyclophilin A (CypA) signaling in pericytes, which controls BBB integrity (Bell et al., 2012). In NVC, astrocytic calcium signaling mediates capillary dilation via pericytes (Mishra et al., 2016; Kisler et al., 2017a).
Oligodendrocyte Precursor Cells and Pericytes
Oligodendrocyte precursor cells (OPCs) have recently emerged as one of the contributors to BBB. According to their regional differences, OPCs can be divided into two subtypes, namely, perivascular OPCs and parenchymal OPCs (Maki, 2017; Kishida et al., 2019). In the human and mouse brain, perivascular OPCs are attached to cerebral endothelial cells and pericytes through basal lamina, and thereby are thought to become novel components of the BBB (Seo et al., 2013; Maki et al., 2015). OPC-specific TGFβ1 depleted mice exhibited cerebral hemorrhage and loss of BBB function, showing the role of OPCs for BBB maintenance through TGFβ1 signaling (Seo et al., 2014). In vitro experiments have shown that OPC-derived factors increase pericyte proliferation whereas pericyte-derived factors support OPC self-renewal and differentiation (Maki et al., 2015, 2018). In the developing mouse forebrain, pericyte-derived TGFβ family proteins contribute to the migration and distribution of OPCs in brain parenchyma (Choe et al., 2014), while perivascular OPC migration to the vessels in the developing CNS requires interaction with endothelium but not pericytes (Tsai et al., 2016).
In the adult mouse brain, pericytes respond to toxin-induced demyelination in the brain and stimulate OPC differentiation during remyelination through Lama2 (De La Fuente et al., 2017). Pericyte-derived Lama2 also instructs neuronal stem cells to an oligodendrocyte fate (Silva et al., 2019).
A recent report has shown that odor triggers rapid Ca2+ elevations in OPC processes before pericytes and SMCs dilate the vessels responding to synaptic activation, suggesting possible relationship between OPCs and pericytes in the NVC (Rungta et al., 2018).
Microglia and Pericytes
Microglia have been regarded as the main executor of inflammation after acute and chronic CNS disorders. The interaction between microglia and vascular cells – including pericytes – has important roles for vascular inflammation, angiogenesis, and BBB integrity (Ding et al., 2018; Thurgur and Pinteaux, 2019). Although endothelial cells are thought to be the main source of cytokines and chemokines which trigger microglial activation upon vascular inflammation, pericytes are also known to be key mediators in this process. In response to TNFα, rat brain pericytes in vitro produce IL6 and macrophage inflammatory protein 1 (MIP1), which trigger microglial activation (Matsumoto et al., 2014). Activated microglia disrupt the BBB, which triggers angiogenesis (Dudvarski Stankovic et al., 2016; Shigemoto-Mogami et al., 2018). In the mouse brain, pericytes initially respond to the systemic inflammation within 2 h and secrete CCL2 before the response of astrocytes or microglia (Duan et al., 2018). Given that CCL2 is also known to activate microglia (He M. et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2017) and microglial process motility dynamics are altered 48 h after systemic infection (Gyoneva et al., 2014), pericytes might modulate microglial process motility and physical dynamics around the vessels in response to infection. Furthermore, pericytes themselves acquire a microglial phenotype after ischemic stroke as mentioned above (Özen et al., 2014; Sakuma et al., 2016). Conversely, pericytes also secrete several anti-inflammatory substances such as IL33 and CX3CL1 (Rustenhoven et al., 2016, 2017; Yang et al., 2016), both of which has shown promote anti-inflammatory microglial phenotype in mouse models (Cardona et al., 2006; Fu et al., 2016).
Perivascular Macrophages and Pericytes
In the human and mouse brain, perivascular macrophages lie under the basement membrane alongside pericytes (Fabriek et al., 2005; Goldmann et al., 2016). Perivascular macrophages maintain tight junctions between endothelial cells and limit vessel permeability, phagocytose potential pathogens before they enter tissues from the blood and restrict inappropriate inflammation (Zenker et al., 2003). Although pericytes and perivascular macrophages are localized close to each other and possess shared functions including regulation of vascular permeability and phagocytosis, little is known about how pericytes interact with perivascular macrophages in the vascular niche (Lapenna et al., 2018).
Pathological Roles of Pericytes in Cerebrovascular Diseases and AD
Blood–brain barrier breakdown and microvessel dysfunction has been observed in various CNS disorders such as small vessel disease (SVD), ischemic acute stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, Alzheimer’s disease (AD), traumatic brain injury (TBI)/chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), multiple sclerosis (MS), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), Lewy body diseases (LBD), and epilepsy (Winkler et al., 2013; Coatti et al., 2019; Erdener and Dalkara, 2019; Geranmayeh et al., 2019). In particular, pericyte dysfunction is thought to be a critical factor for aggravating dementing diseases such as vascular cognitive impairment/dementia and AD (Sagare et al., 2013; Montagne et al., 2018; Nikolakopoulou et al., 2019).
Cognitive impairment/dementia related to vascular pathology is classified according to the causative vessel size, that is, ‘small vessel’ disease and ‘large vessel’ disease, although their crosstalk would be essential for the pathogenesis of both disorders (Ihara and Yamamoto, 2016). Cerebral SVD contributes to a wide range of pathological processes, which affect the small vessels including small arteries, arterioles, venules, and capillaries in the brain (Østergaard et al., 2016; Staszewski et al., 2017; Parkes et al., 2018). In contrast, large vessel disease in the brain may result in stroke and hemorrhage, which affect various type of arteries (Nomura et al., 2018). Table 2 provides the roles of CNS pericytes in health and disease focusing on cerebrovascular diseases and AD.
Small Vessel Disease
SVD is characterized by pathological changes in the small vessels with a diameter < 100 μm, with concentric smooth muscle thickening in arterioles, as well as pericyte degeneration, basal membrane thickening, endothelial, and astrocyte end-feet swelling in capillaries (Craggs et al., 2014; Bosetti et al., 2016; Østergaard et al., 2016). The slowly progressive worsening of microcirculatory structure and function results in white matter changes, which can be detected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
Small vessel disease is commonly known to be co-morbid brain pathology in a wide range of neurodegenerative diseases including CTE, MS, LBD, and diverse tauopathies including AD (Erdener and Dalkara, 2019). In sporadic SVD, pericytes play pivotal roles as they reside in the small vessels and contribute to maintenance of the BBB, vascular integrity, inflammation, and angiogenesis. Chronic hypoperfusion in the rodent brain results in degeneration of pericytes and decreased pericyte coverage in brain blood vessels, and increased BBB permeability followed by white matter attenuation (Ueno et al., 2002; Liu Q. et al., 2019). Pericyte-deficient mice also cause circulatory failure in the brain which can trigger white matter functional deficits and neuronal loss (Bell et al., 2010; Montagne et al., 2018; Nikolakopoulou et al., 2019).
A leaky BBB allows for the extravasation of toxic-blood derived products such as fibrinogen, which accumulates around the vasculature as insoluble fibrin (Bell et al., 2010; Montagne et al., 2018; Nikolakopoulou et al., 2019). Fibrinogen/fibrin infiltration results in clustering and activation of macrophages and microglia as well as chemokine- and antigen presentation-mediated recruitment and activation of T cells, causing axonal degeneration (Davalos et al., 2012; Ryu et al., 2015). Pericytes produce numerous pro-inflammatory mediators including reactive oxygen/nitrogen species (ROS/RNS), which induces neurons to undergo stress-induced apoptosis (Rustenhoven et al., 2017). This pro-inflammatory status in the vessels induces leukocyte adhesion and microglial activation (Matsumoto et al., 2018; Erdener and Dalkara, 2019). Under chronic hypoperfusion, bone morphogenetic protein 4 (BMP4) expression is increased by pericytes, which induces astrogliogenesis and aggravates white matter attenuation (Uemura et al., 2018).
Chronic hypoperfusion induces compensatory angiogenesis by increasing the expression of angiogenetic factors such as VEGF, ANGPT1/2, and MMP9 (Jian et al., 2003; Ohtaki et al., 2006; Min-Soo et al., 2018). VEGF and ANGPT1 promote sprouting and proliferation of endothelial cells, and recruitment of pericytes (Shane and Didier, 2011). MMP9 regulates the detachment of pericytes from vessels thereby triggering angiogenesis (Joyce, 2005).
The importance of pericytes in SVD may be emphasized by the fact that one of the most common inherited cerebral SVD, cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL), shows aggregation of mutant Notch3 protein around capillary pericytes as well as arteriolar SMCs (Ihara and Yamamoto, 2016). Pericytes express Notch3 and are first affected by Notch3 aggregation in Notch3R169C mice, suggesting pericytes might be a main contributor in the pathogenesis of CADASIL (Ghosh et al., 2015). A recent study, however, has shown no change in pericyte coverage in the white matter lesion of CADASIL patients nor Notch3R169C mice, arguing against the prevailing hypothesis that pericyte loss is the primary driver of white matter lesions (Rajani et al., 2019). The jury is still out on the contribution of pericytes to the white matter damage.
Cerebral Ischemic Stroke
Residing in the microvessels, pericytes have a great influence on the condition of the brain following acute ischemic stroke caused by thrombosis or embolism affecting larger vessels. The biological roles of pericytes, such as regulation of CBF, BBB maintenance, inflammation and immunological properties, angiogenesis, and scar formation are all involved in the status of the ischemic brain (Gautam and Yao, 2018).
During arterial obstruction, pericytes positioned on the proximal capillaries constrict the vessels and impede capillary blood flow, which lasts even after arterial recanalization, developing a no-reflow phenomenon (Dalkara and Arsava, 2012; Gursoy-Ozdemir et al., 2012; Hall et al., 2014, Hill et al., 2015). The debate about whether these cells are pericytes or SMCs was discussed above.
During stroke, BBB permeability is increased, and sustained ischemia leads to increased BBB disruption (Simpkins et al., 2016). Severe BBB disruption during stroke increases the risk of hemorrhage in patients treated with intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator (Deguchi et al., 2014). During ischemia, as in SVD, ROS production and MMP9 up-regulation in pericytes contribute to BBB breakdown. An enzymatic source of ROS production, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase 4 (NOX4), is highly up-regulated by pericytes in the peri-infarct region of the mouse brain subjected to middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO), and overexpression of NOX4 in pericytes induces BBB breakdown by up-regulating MMP9 (Nishimura et al., 2016). Pericytes also directly release MMP9 during ischemia, which interrupts the tight junctions between endothelial cells and the binding of astrocyte endfeet to the vascular wall (Underly et al., 2017). VEGF up-regulation by pericytes under ischemic conditions has also been reported to disrupt the BBB in vitro and in vivo (Zheng Gang et al., 2000; Bai et al., 2015), and this triggers further angiogenesis. However, a report has shown that prolonged exposure to VEGF enhances post-ischemic BBB integrity and reduces infarct volume in mice subjected to transient MCAO (Zechariah et al., 2013). Thus, VEGF might have a pluripotent role in BBB integrity according to the dosage and timing of its release.
Pericytes might also play a role in regulating ischemia-induced leukocyte infiltration as pericytes express cell surface adhesion molecules and induce leukocyte transmigration in response to inflammatory mediators (Balabanov et al., 1999; Pieper et al., 2013; Stark et al., 2013). Pericytes express ICAM-1, which guide leukocyte migration through gaps between pericytes by interacting with the integrin ligands on leukocytes (Proebstl et al., 2012).
Aside from these detrimental roles, pericytes play a beneficial role in ischemic stroke via promoting angiogenesis and scar formation. During MCAO-inducing ischemia in the mouse brains, pericytes are recruited from the periphery as well as parenchyma, and are involved in angiogenesis and blood vessel stabilization (Renner et al., 2003; Kokovay et al., 2006). Pericyte migration to the infarcted area forming the core of the scar, which is distinct from the astroglial scar surrounding the core (Fernández-Klett et al., 2013). Consistent with that, Pdgfrb+ /− mice demonstrated decreased fibrosis in the ischemic area and enlarged infarct volume (Makihara et al., 2015). Although glial scar formation is beneficial to prevent toxic substances from spreading, it should be noted that excessive or long-lasting glial scar formation inhibits axonal regeneration and stalls the recovery process (Dias et al., 2018). Furthermore, detachment of pericytes from capillaries allows them to migrate toward ischemic region thereby causing further leakage of the BBB. The same is true of angiogenesis. While angiogenesis increases the blood supply to the peri-infarct area, insufficient angiogenesis results in leaky blood vessels leading to brain hemorrhage (Kuhnert et al., 2010; Cullen et al., 2011).
AD is the most prevailing dementia among the elderly and is defined pathologically by the presence of Aβ accumulation in brain parenchyma as Aβ plaque and aggregation of hyperphosphorylated tau as neurofibrillary tangles as well as neuritic plaques and neuropil threads. Aβ also accumulate in the vessels as cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA). Recently, it has been increasingly recognized that the decreased CBF and white matter attenuation associated with BBB breakdown correlates with the accumulation of AD pathology, and contributes to the onset and progression of dementia (Iturria-Medina et al., 2016; Leijenaar et al., 2017; Park et al., 2019). CBF reduction, BBB breakdown in the hippocampus, and an increase in PDGFRβ level in the CSF occur even in the very early stages of cognitive impairment (Iris et al., 2007; Montagne et al., 2015; Iturria-Medina et al., 2016; Nation et al., 2019) as well as later stages of AD (Miners et al., 2019). In AD patient brains, microvessels are frequently narrowed and irregular in diameter especially in the vicinity of the senile plaques, which is accompanied by decreased capillary bed densities (Kitaguchi et al., 2007). Some vessels in these area are collapsed with lacking endothelial cells, and do not carry blood flow, called string vessels (Hunter et al., 2012). In the mouse brain, infusion of Aβ caused endothelin-1 (ET1) upregulation in cerebral vasculature through receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE), which contributes to Aβ-induced CBF reduction (Deane et al., 2003). CBF reduction accompanied by increased vascular RAGE and ET1 is also observed in Tg2576 mice, which is ameliorated by blocking Aβ and RAGE binding (Deane et al., 2003). A recent study has shown that capillaries in the AD brains are constricted by pericytes, which causes a decrease in CBF (Nortley et al., 2019). In rat brains, Aβ oligomer-induced ROS triggers the release of ET1 to stimulate pericytes contraction and CBF reduction (Nortley et al., 2019). AD patients also show a decrease in pericyte coverage with an increase in extravascular immunoglobulin G and fibrin deposition (Sengillo et al., 2013). The apolipoprotein E4 genotype, which is a major genetic risk factor for late-onset AD, leads to pericyte loss and enhances CypA-MMP9 pathway of BBB degradation (Halliday et al., 2016). Pericytes express LRP1 and other Aβ-binding receptors such as the low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR), RAGE, and CD36 in brains with AD pathology including CAA (Zenaro et al., 2017). Aβ accumulation in pericytes is observed in human AD brains and in the brains of APPsw/0 mice (Ma et al., 2018). At the ultrastructural level of AD brains, pericytes are disorganized and exhibit mitochondrial abnormalities, pinocytotic vesicles, and accumulation of osmophilic material (Farkas and Luiten, 2001; Baloyannis and Baloyannis, 2012).
Loss of BBB integrity caused by pericyte deterioration may induce an influx of immune cells into the brain, driving inflammation, and CBF stagnation and thereby impairing Aβ clearance, all of which aggravate AD pathology (Mazza et al., 2011; Kinney et al., 2018). Indeed, both the depletion of pericytes in the APPsw/0 mice (APPsw/0; Pdfgfb+ /−) (Sagare et al., 2013) and chronic cerebral hypoperfusion in the APPSwInd Tg mice (Kitaguchi et al., 2009; Yamada et al., 2011) aggravate AD pathology such as increasing Aβ deposition and tau phosphorylation followed by neuronal loss. Notably, a high-fat diet, which leads to vascular related diseases, exacerbates AD pathology accompanied by pericyte dysfunction in the APPsw/PS1 mice (Theriault et al., 2016).
Although Aβ is toxic to the pericytes, pericytes basically take an active part in the clearance of Aβ by phagocytosis and translocation through BBB (Winkler et al., 2014; Alla et al., 2019). Pericytes clear Aβ aggregates via an LRP1/ApoE isoform-specific mechanisms, suggesting a potential therapeutic target for controlling Aβ clearance in AD (Winkler et al., 2014; Ma et al., 2018).
Therapeutic Strategies Focusing on Pericytes
Since pericytes have multifunctional properties and contribute to the various neurological disorders, pericytes as a therapeutic target, can be approached from various aspects: (1) prevention of BBB dysfunction, (2) promoting angiogenesis and vascular stability, (3) reduction of pericyte constriction under pathological condition, (4) up-regulation of Aβ clearance, (5) control of inflammation, (6) implantation therapy through multipotential stem cell properties, and (7) regulation of proper scar formation.
As the BBB tightly restricts the passage of substances into the CNS, it is challenging to deliver drugs from blood circulation into the brain. Therefore, the delivery methods which enable the drugs to pass through BBB may be beneficial as exemplified by encapsulating drugs in liposomes or nanoparticles (Gaudin et al., 2014; Fullstone et al., 2016; Zhou et al., 2018).
Prevention of BBB Dysfunction, Promoting Angiogenesis, and Vascular Stability
Loss of pericytes and BBB dysfunction are common in a variety of neurological disorders including cerebrovascular diseases and AD. Thus, promoting the interaction of pericytes and endothelial cells by regulating PDGFB/PDGFRβ, TGFβ, Notch, ANGPT/TEK, and VEGF signaling could be therapeutic by preventing BBB dysfunction and facilitating proper angiogenesis and vascular stability. For instance, increasing PDGF-BB in the endothelial cells and/or PDGFRβ in the pericytes could boost pericyte proliferation and migration to microvessels while increasing TGFβ signaling could promote pericyte proliferation and attachment to the vessels (Winkler et al., 2011b). Indeed, administration of TGFβ showed increased BBB formation under ischemic condition in vitro and in vivo (Shen et al., 2019). VEGF treatment was also shown to enhance post-ischemic BBB integrity and reduce infarct volume in rodent models of MCAO (Zheng Gang et al., 2000; Zechariah et al., 2013). Recently, regulating RNA for maintaining the BBB has been investigated and overexpression of cPWWP2A or silencing microRNA-579 expression promoted pericyte-endothelial cell crosstalk and microvascular stability (Liu C. et al., 2019). Administration of microRNA-149-5p attenuated BBB permeability and improved the outcomes of rat subjected with transient MCAO (Wan et al., 2018).
Reduction of ROS and MMP9 should also prevent pericyte-mediated BBB breakdown. A recent study observed that MMP9 inhibitors reduced pericyte-associated BBB leakage (Underly et al., 2017). A free radical scavenger edaravone has been sown to ameliorate brain damage after ischemia via pericyte-mediated angiogenesis and vessel stability (Deguchi et al., 2014). Further, cilostazol – a phosphodiesterase 3 inhibitor – promoted angiogenesis through pericyte proliferation with inhibition of the MMP9, which maintained vascular integrity in spontaneously hypertensive stroke prone (SHR-SP) rat (Omote et al., 2014) while cilostazol also ameliorated cerebral hemorrhage in mice by protecting the BBB (Takagi et al., 2017), suggesting cilostazol has additional effects of vascular stability aside from antithrombosis.
Reduction of Capillary Constriction by Pericytes Under Ischemia or Aβ Accumulation
Since the no-reflow phenomenon hampers the tissue recovery after recanalization in the arteries, researchers have tried to find clues to prevent capillary constriction by pericytes after ischemia. These ischemia-induced pericyte contraction have shown to be relieved by suppressing ROS/RNS (Yemisci et al., 2009; Deguchi et al., 2014; Hall et al., 2014), removal of external Ca2+ (Hall et al., 2014), or administration of adenosine and sodium nitroprusside (Neuhaus et al., 2017; O’Farrell et al., 2017). Capillary constriction by pericytes and CBF reduction are also observed in AD brains, which may aggravate cognitive decline. Aβ infusion into mouse brain causes RAGE-ET1 mediated CBF reduction, similar to the CBF reduction observed in aged Tg2576 mice (Deane et al., 2003). Furthermore, a RAGE-specific inhibitor recovered CBF and lowered the Aβ burden in APPsw/0 mice (Deane et al., 2012). Aβ oligomers induce pericyte constriction by ROS mediated ET1 release (Nortley et al., 2019). This Aβ-evoked constriction was reversed by applying the vasodilator C-type natriuretic peptide and could be halted by blocking NOX4 or ET1 receptors, suggesting potential therapeutic target for CBF reduction in AD.
Up-Regulation of Aβ Clearance
Because pericytes take up Aβ, then degrade or excrete it into the circulation, boosting pericyte function could be therapeutic target for Aβ clearance in AD. Consistent with that, pericyte loss in the APPsw/0 mice showed increased Aβ accumulation and tau phosphorylation (Sagare et al., 2013). Pericytes internalize and clear aggregated Aβ by LRP1-dependent ApoE isoform-specific mechanism (Ma et al., 2018), highlighting up-regulation of LRP1 as a therapeutic target for Aβ clearance.
Control of Inflammation
Neuroinflammation is present in almost all neurological diseases. Pericytes release both pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory mediators and regulate recruitment of immune cells from the blood to the brain parenchyma. Although inflammation may have some positive aspects such as immunoprotection against pathogens, clearance of toxic substances, and support of angiogenesis, excessive inflammation causes BBB leakage, tissue damages and neuronal loss.
Targeting ROS-mediated inflammation is a feasible therapeutic target in terms of suppressing release of pro-inflammatory cytokines by pericytes with preventing pericyte loss and BBB dysfunction. A free radical scavenger edaravone has been sown to ameliorate brain damage after ischemia (Deguchi et al., 2014). Targeting receptor or downstream signaling stimulated by pericyte-secreted cytokines may also be potential therapeutic target. Blocking pericyte-derived BMP4 by its receptor antagonist noggin treatment was shown to suppress astrogliogenesis and alleviate white matter damage resulting from chronic cerebral hypoperfusion (Uemura et al., 2018). Targeting transcription factors that regulate immune functions following inflammatory insults might be another option to suppress the detrimental effects of inflammation.
Implantation Therapy, Application of Multipotential Stem Cell Properties
Implantation of mesenchymal stem cell-derived pericytes in mice that model AD plaque pathology reduces the Aβ burden, demonstrating the possibility of cell-based therapy for AD treatment (Tachibana et al., 2018). Easy accessibility of pericytes for autologous transplantation highlights their capabilities for future therapeutic studies (Geranmayeh et al., 2019). Since pericyte-like cells derived from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) acquire BBB properties and are incorporated with iPSC-derived endothelial cells, astrocytes and neurons (Faal et al., 2019; Stebbins et al., 2019), iPSC-derived pericytes might also be promising for implantation therapy of AD and other neurological disorders. Pericytes themselves have been shown to acquire stem cell-like and microglial properties after ischemia (Özen et al., 2014; Nakagomi et al., 2015a), which offers another potential therapeutic target for recovery form CNS diseases.
Regulation of Proper Scar Formation
As discussed above, scar formation in the ischemic brain and brain/spinal cord injury has pluripotent effects on diverse CNS conditions. While the scar formation by pericytes and glia play fundamental roles in promoting angiogenesis and tissue remodeling (Hesp et al., 2018), reducing pericyte-derived scar formation has been reported to promote axonal regeneration and recovery from spinal cord injury (Dias et al., 2018). Administration of periostin-neutralizing antibody, which suppresses pericyte-induced scar formation, ameliorates functional recovery after spinal cord injury (Yokota et al., 2017), but further studies are needed to demonstrate the therapeutic potential of these strategies including the appropriate timing and degree of intervention.
All CNS cells and tissues need a blood supply coming from outside the brain. Located at the interface between CNS tissue and blood circulation and having multi-functional properties, pericytes play a variety of fundamental roles in the healthy CNS. As a result, pericytes offer many opportunities for therapeutic intervention in a broad range of neurological disorders, including cerebrovascular disorders and AD. Vascular cognitive impairment/dementia and AD account for more than 3/4 of dementing diseases, and vascular pathology is often observed in a various neurodegenerative disease, especially in AD, where pericytes are thought to contribute. With increasing knowledge about the molecular mechanisms operating in pericytes and their crosstalk with neighboring cells, the targeting pericytes as a therapeutic strategy has become increasingly important and research on this topic is likely to accelerate more in the future.
MU conceptualized the study, designed and drafted the manuscript and figures, and handled the funding. TM supervised and critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. MI, VL, and JT handled the funding, supervising, and making critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content.
This work was funded by 201870008, JSPS overseas Research Fellowships (to MU), 19jm0210053h0003, Strategic International Collaborative Research Program (SICORP) from Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (to MI), and also funded by P30 AG010124, U10 AG062418, the Jeff and Anne Keefer Fund and the Neurodegenerative Disease Research Fund (to VL and JT).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The authors thank Mr. John Robinson for proofreading the manuscript.
Abbott, J. N., Pizzo, M. E., Preston, J. E., Janigro, D., and Thorne, R. G. (2018). The role of brain barriers in fluid movement in the CNS: is there a ‘glymphatic’ system? Acta Neuropathol. 135, 387–407. doi: 10.1007/s00401-018-1812-4
Absinta, M., Ha, S. K., Nair, G., Sati, P., Luciano, N. J., Palisoc, M., et al. (2017). Human and nonhuman primate meninges harbor lymphatic vessels that can be visualized noninvasively by MRI. Elife 6:29738. doi: 10.7554/eLife.29738
Ahn, J. H., Cho, H., Kim, J. H., Kim, S. H., Ham, J. S., Park, I., et al. (2019). Meningeal lymphatic vessels at the skull base drain cerebrospinal fluid. Nature 572, 62–66. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1419-5
Alarcon-Martinez, L., Yilmaz-Ozcan, S., Yemisci, M., Schallek, J., Kilic, K., Can, A., et al. (2018). Capillary pericytes express alpha-smooth muscle actin, which requires prevention of filamentous-actin depolymerization for detection. Elife 7:e34861. doi: 10.7554/eLife.34861
Allende, M. L., Yamashita, T., and Proia, R. L. (2003). G-protein-coupled receptor S1P1 acts within endothelial cells to regulate vascular maturation. Blood 102, 3665–3667. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-02-0460
Anderson, M. A., Burda, J. E., Ren, Y., Ao, Y., O’Shea, T. M., Kawaguchi, R., et al. (2016). Astrocyte scar formation aids central nervous system axon regeneration. Nature 532, 195–200. doi: 10.1038/nature17623
Arango-Lievano, M., Boussadia, B., De Terdonck, L. D. T., Gault, C., Fontanaud, P., Lafont, C., et al. (2018). Topographic reorganization of cerebrovascular mural cells under seizure conditions. Cell Rep. 23, 1045–1059. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.03.110
Armulik, A., Genové, G., and Betsholtz, C. (2011). Pericytes: developmental, physiological, and pathological perspectives, problems, and promises. Dev. Cell 21, 193–215. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.07.001
Aspelund, A., Antila, S., Proulx, S. T., Karlsen, T. V., Karaman, S., Detmar, M., et al. (2015). A dural lymphatic vascular system that drains brain interstitial fluid and macromolecules. J. Exp. Med. 212, 991–999. doi: 10.1084/jem.20142290
Bai, Y., Zhu, X., Chao, J., Zhang, Y., Qian, C., Li, P., et al. (2015). Pericytes contribute to the disruption of the cerebral endothelial barrier via increasing VEGF expression: implications for stroke. PLoS One 10:e0124362. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124362
Balabanov, R., Beaumont, T., and Dore-Duffy, P. (1999). Role of central nervous system microvascular pericytes in activation of antigen-primed splenic T-lymphocytes. J. Neurosci. Res. 55, 578–587. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4547(19990301)55:5<578::Aid-jnr5>3.0.Co;2-e
Baloyannis, S. J., and Baloyannis, I. S. (2012). The vascular factor in Alzheimer’s disease: a study in Golgi technique and electron microscopy. J. Neurol. Sci. 322, 117–121. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2012.07.010
Bandopadhyay, R., Orte, C., Lawrenson, J. G., Reid, A. R., Silva, S. D., and Allt, G. (2001). Contractile proteins in pericytes at the blood-brain and blood-retinal barriers. J. Neurocytol. 30, 35–44.
Bell, R. D., Winkler, E. A., Sagare, A. P., Singh, I., LaRue, B., Deane, R., et al. (2010). Pericytes control key neurovascular functions and neuronal phenotype in the adult brain and during brain aging. Neuron 68, 409–427. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.09.043
Bell, R. D., Winkler, E. A., Singh, I., Sagare, A. P., Deane, R., Wu, Z., et al. (2012). Apolipoprotein E controls cerebrovascular integrity via cyclophilin A. Nature 485, 512–516. doi: 10.1038/nature11087
Berthiaume, A.-A., Hartmann, D. A., Majesky, M. W., Bhat, N. R., and Shih, A. Y. (2018). Pericyte structural remodeling in cerebrovascular health and homeostasis. Front. Aging Neurosci. 10:210. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2018.00210
Bevan, J. A., Dodge, J., Walters, C. L., Wellman, T., and Bevan, R. D. (1999). As human pial arteries (internal diameter 200–1000 μm) get smaller, their wall thickness and capacity to develop tension relative to their diameter increase. Life Sci. 65, 1153–1161. doi: 10.1016/s0024-3205(99)00349-5
Blocki, A., Beyer, S., Jung, F., and Raghunath, M. (2018). The controversial origin of pericytes during angiogenesis – implications for cell-based therapeutic angiogenesis and cell-based therapies. Clin. Hemorheol. Microcirc. 69, 215–232. doi: 10.3233/ch-189132
Bondjers, C., He, L., Takemoto, M., Norlin, J., Asker, N., Hellstrom, M., et al. (2006). Microarray analysis of blood microvessels from PDGF-B and PDGF-Rbeta mutant mice identifies novel markers for brain pericytes. FASEB J. 20, 1703–1705. doi: 10.1096/fj.05-4944fje
Bonkowski, D., Katyshev, V., Balabanov, R. D., Borisov, A., and Dore-Duffy, P. (2011). The CNS microvascular pericyte: pericyte-astrocyte crosstalk in the regulation of tissue survival. Fluids Barriers CNS 8:8. doi: 10.1186/2045-8118-8-8
Bosetti, F., Galis, Z. S., Bynoe, M. S., Charette, M., Cipolla, M. J., Del Zoppo, G. J., et al. (2016). Small blood vessels: big health problems?” Scientific recommendations of the national institutes of health workshop. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 5:e004389. doi: 10.1161/jaha.116.004389
Brown, L. S., Foster, C. G., Courtney, J.-M., King, N. E., Howells, D. W., and Sutherland, B. A. (2019). Pericytes and neurovascular function in the healthy and diseased brain. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 13:282. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2019.00282
Cai, C., Fordsmann, J. C., Jensen, S. H., Gesslein, B., Lønstrup, M., Hald, B. O., et al. (2018). Stimulation-induced increases in cerebral blood flow and local capillary vasoconstriction depend on conducted vascular responses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 115, E5796–E5804. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1707702115
Carare, R. O., Bernardes-Silva, M., Newman, T. A., Page, A. M., Nicoll, J. A., Perry, V. H., et al. (2008). Solutes, but not cells, drain from the brain parenchyma along basement membranes of capillaries and arteries: significance for cerebral amyloid angiopathy and neuroimmunology. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 34, 131–144. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2990.2007.00926.x
Carare, R. O., Hawkes, C. A., and Weller, R. O. (2014). Afferent and efferent immunological pathways of the brain. Anatomy, function and failure. Brain Behav. Immun. 36, 9–14. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2013.10.012
Cardona, A. E., Pioro, E. P., Sasse, M. E., Kostenko, V., Cardona, S. M., Dijkstra, I. M., et al. (2006). Control of microglial neurotoxicity by the fractalkine receptor. Nat. Neurosci. 9, 917–924. doi: 10.1038/nn1715
Cheng, J., Korte, N., Nortley, R., Sethi, H., Tang, Y., and Attwell, D. (2018). Targeting pericytes for therapeutic approaches to neurological disorders. Acta Neuropathol. 136, 507–523. doi: 10.1007/s00401-018-1893-0
Choe, Y., Huynh, T., and Pleasure, S. J. (2014). Migration of oligodendrocyte progenitor cells is controlled by transforming growth factor β family proteins during corticogenesis. J. Neurosci. 34, 14973–14983. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1156-14.2014
Craggs, L., Yamamoto, Y., Deramecourt, V., and Kalaria, R. N. (2014). Microvascular pathology and morphometrics of sporadic and hereditary small vessel diseases of the brain. Brain Pathol. 24, 495–509. doi: 10.1111/bpa.12177
Cullen, M., Elzarrad, M. K., Seaman, S., Zudaire, E., Stevens, J., Yang, M. Y., et al. (2011). GPR124, an orphan G protein-coupled receptor, is required for CNS-specific vascularization and establishment of the blood-brain barrier. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 5759–5764. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1017192108
Dalkara, T., and Arsava, E. (2012). Can restoring incomplete microcirculatory reperfusion improve stroke outcome after thrombolysis? J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 32, 2091–2099. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2012.139
Damisah, E. C., Hill, R. A., Tong, L., Murray, K. N., and Grutzendler, J. (2017). A fluoro-Nissl dye identifies pericytes as distinct vascular mural cells during in vivo brain imaging. Nat. Neurosci. 20, 1023–1032. doi: 10.1038/nn.4564
Darland, D. C., Massingham, L. J., Smith, S. R., Piek, E., Saint-Geniez, M., and D’Amore, P. A. (2003). Pericyte production of cell-associated VEGF is differentiation-dependent and is associated with endothelial survival. Dev. Biol. 264, 275–288. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2003.08.015
Davalos, D., Ryu, J., Merlini, M., Baeten, K. M., Moan, N., Petersen, M. A., et al. (2012). Fibrinogen-induced perivascular microglial clustering is required for the development of axonal damage in neuroinflammation. Nat. Commun. 3:1227. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2230
De La Fuente, A. G., Lange, S., Silva, M. E., Gonzalez, G. A., Tempfer, H., van Wijngaarden, P., et al. (2017). Pericytes stimulate oligodendrocyte progenitor cell differentiation during CNS remyelination. Cell Rep. 20, 1755–1764. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.08.007
Deane, R., Du Yan, S., Submamaryan, R. K., LaRue, B., Jovanovic, S., Hogg, E., et al. (2003). RAGE mediates amyloid-beta peptide transport across the blood-brain barrier and accumulation in brain. Nat. Med. 9, 907–913. doi: 10.1038/nm890
Deane, R., Singh, I., Sagare, A. P., Bell, R. D., Ross, N. T., LaRue, B., et al. (2012). A multimodal RAGE-specific inhibitor reduces amyloid beta-mediated brain disorder in a mouse model of Alzheimer disease. J Clin. Invest. 122, 1377–1392. doi: 10.1172/jci58642
Deguchi, K., Liu, N., Liu, W., Omote, Y., Kono, S., Yunoki, T., et al. (2014). Pericyte protection by edaravone after tissue plasminogen activator treatment in rat cerebral ischemia. J. Neurosci. Res. 92, 1509–1519. doi: 10.1002/jnr.23420
Dias, D., Kim, H., Holl, D., Solnestam, B., Lundeberg, J., Carlén, M., et al. (2018). Reducing pericyte-derived scarring promotes recovery after spinal cord injury. Cell 173, 153–165.e22. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.004
Diaz-Flores, L., Gutierrez, R., Madrid, J. F., Varela, H., Valladares, F., Acosta, E., et al. (2009). Pericytes, morphofunction, interactions and pathology in a quiescent and activated mesenchymal cell niche. Histol. Histopathol. 24, 909–969. doi: 10.14670/HH-24.909
Ding, X., Gu, R., Zhang, M., Ren, H., Shu, Q., Xu, G., et al. (2018). Microglia enhanced the angiogenesis, migration and proliferation of co-cultured RMECs. BMC Ophthalmol. 18:249. doi: 10.1186/s12886-018-0886-z
Dore-Duffy, P., Katychev, A., Wang, X., and Buren, E. (2006). CNS microvascular pericytes exhibit multipotential stem cell activity. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 26, 613–624. doi: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600272
Duan, L., Zhang, X.-D., Miao, W.-Y., Sun, Y.-J., Xiong, G., Wu, Q., et al. (2018). PDGFRβ cells rapidly relay inflammatory signal from the circulatory system to neurons via chemokine CCL2. Neuron. 100, 183–200.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.08.030
Dudvarski Stankovic, N., Teodorczyk, M., Ploen, R., Zipp, F., and Schmidt, M. H. H. (2016). Microglia-blood vessel interactions: a double-edged sword in brain pathologies. Acta Neuropathol. 131, 347–363. doi: 10.1007/s00401-015-1524-y
Durham, J. T., Surks, H. K., Dulmovits, B. M., and Herman, I. M. (2014). Pericyte contractility controls endothelial cell cycle progression and sprouting: insights into angiogenic switch mechanics. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 307, C878–C892. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00185.2014
Eilken, H. M., Diéguez-Hurtado, R., Schmidt, I., Nakayama, M., Jeong, H.-W., Arf, H., et al. (2017). Pericytes regulate VEGF-induced endothelial sprouting through VEGFR1. Nat. Commun. 8:1574. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01738-3
Engelhardt, B., Carare, R. O., Bechmann, I., Flugel, A., Laman, J. D., and Weller, R. O. (2016). Vascular, glial, and lymphatic immune gateways of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol. 132, 317–338. doi: 10.1007/s00401-016-1606-5
Faal, T., Phan, D., Davtyan, H., Scarfone, V. M., Varady, E., Blurton-Jones, M., et al. (2019). Induction of mesoderm and neural crest-derived pericytes from human pluripotent stem cells to study blood-brain barrier interactions. Stem Cell Rep. 12, 451–460. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2019.01.005
Fabriek, B. O., Haastert, E. S., Galea, I., Polfliet, M., Döpp, E. D., Heuvel, M. M., et al. (2005). CD163−positive perivascular macrophages in the human CNS express molecules for antigen recognition and presentation. Glia 51, 297–305. doi: 10.1002/glia.20208
Faraco, G., Park, L., Anrather, J., and Iadecola, C. (2017). Brain perivascular macrophages: characterization and functional roles in health and disease. J. Mol. Med. 95, 1143–1152. doi: 10.1007/s00109-017-1573-x
Fernández-Klett, F., Offenhauser, N., Dirnagl, U., Priller, J., and Lindauer, U. (2010). Pericytes in capillaries are contractile in vivo, but arterioles mediate functional hyperemia in the mouse brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 22290–22295. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1011321108
Fernández-Klett, F., Potas, J. R., Hilpert, D., Blazej, K., Radke, J., Huck, J., et al. (2013). Early loss of pericytes and perivascular stromal cell-induced scar formation after stroke. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 33, 428–439. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2012.187
Franco, M., Roswall, P., Cortez, E., Hanahan, D., and Pietras, K. (2011). Pericytes promote endothelial cell survival through induction of autocrine VEGF-A signaling and Bcl-w expression. Blood 118, 2906–2917. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-01-331694
Fu, A. K., Hung, K. W., Yuen, M. Y., Zhou, X., Mak, D. S., Chan, I. C., et al. (2016). IL-33 ameliorates Alzheimer’s disease-like pathology and cognitive decline. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 113, E2705–E2713. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1604032113
Fullstone, G., Nyberg, S., Tian, X., and Battaglia, G. (2016). From the blood to the central nervous system: a Nanoparticle’s journey through the blood-brain barrier by transcytosis. Int. Rev. Neurobiol. 130, 41–72. doi: 10.1016/bs.irn.2016.06.001
Gaengel, K., Genové, G., Armulik, A., and Betsholtz, C. (2009). Endothelial-mural cell signaling in vascular development and angiogenesis. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 29, 630–638. doi: 10.1161/atvbaha.107.161521
Gaudin, A., Yemisci, M., Eroglu, H., Lepetre-Mouelhi, S., Turkoglu, O. F., Donmez-Demir, B., et al. (2014). Squalenoyl adenosine nanoparticles provide neuroprotection after stroke and spinal cord injury. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 1054–1062. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2014.274
Geraldes, P., Hiraoka-Yamamoto, J., Matsumoto, M., Clermont, A., Leitges, M., Marette, A., et al. (2009). Activation of PKC-delta and SHP-1 by hyperglycemia causes vascular cell apoptosis and diabetic retinopathy. Nat. Med. 15, 1298–1306. doi: 10.1038/nm.2052
Ghosh, M., Balbi, M., Hellal, F., Dichgans, M., Lindauer, U., and Plesnila, N. (2015). Pericytes are involved in the pathogenesis of cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy. Ann. Neurol. 78, 887–900. doi: 10.1002/ana.24512
Goldmann, T., Wieghofer, P., Jordão, M., Prutek, F., Hagemeyer, N., Frenzel, K., et al. (2016). Origin, fate and dynamics of macrophages at central nervous system interfaces. Nat. Immunol. 17, 797–805. doi: 10.1038/ni.3423
Gould, I. G., Tsai, P., Kleinfeld, D., and Linninger, A. (2016). The capillary bed offers the largest hemodynamic resistance to the cortical blood supply. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 37, 52–68. doi: 10.1177/0271678X16671146
Grant, R. I., Hartmann, D. A., Underly, R. G., Berthiaume, A.-A., Bhat, N. R., and Shih, A. Y. (2019). Organizational hierarchy and structural diversity of microvascular pericytes in adult mouse cortex. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 39, 411–425. doi: 10.1177/0271678x17732229
Grubb, S., Cai, C., Hald, B. O., Khennouf, L., Murmu, R. P., Jensen, A. G. K., et al. (2020). Precapillary sphincters maintain perfusion in the cerebral cortex. Nat. Commun. 11:395. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14330-z
Guadagno, E., and Moukhles, H. (2004). Laminin−induced aggregation of the inwardly rectifying potassium channel, Kir4.1, and the water−permeable channel, AQP4, via a dystroglycan−containing complex in astrocytes. Glia 47, 138–149. doi: 10.1002/glia.20039
Guijarro-Muñoz, I., Compte, M., Álvarez-Cienfuegos, A., Álvarez-Vallina, L., and Sanz, L. (2014). Lipopolysaccharide activates toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)-mediated NF-κB signaling pathway and proinflammatoryresponse in human pericytes. J. Biol. Chem. 4, 2457–2468.
Guimaraes-Camboa, N., Cattaneo, P., Sun, Y., Moore-Morris, T., Gu, Y., Dalton, N. D., et al. (2017). Pericytes of multiple organs do not behave as mesenchymal stem cells in vivo. Cell Stem Cell 20, 345–359.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2016.12.006
Gursoy-Ozdemir, Y., Yemisci, M., and Dalkara, T. (2012). Microvascular protection is essential for successful neuroprotection in stroke. J. Neurochem. 123(Suppl. 2), 2–11. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2012.07938.x
Gyoneva, S., Davalos, D., Biswas, D., Swanger, S. A., Garnier-Amblard, E., Loth, F., et al. (2014). Systemic inflammation regulates microglial responses to tissue damage in vivo. Glia 62, 1345–1360. doi: 10.1002/glia.22686
Hall, C. N., Reynell, C., Gesslein, B., Hamilton, N. B., Mishra, A., Sutherland, B. A., et al. (2014). Capillary pericytes regulate cerebral blood flow in health and disease. Nature 508, 55–60. doi: 10.1038/nature13165
Halliday, M. R., Rege, S. V., Ma, Q., Zhao, Z., Miller, C. A., Winkler, E. A., et al. (2016). Accelerated pericyte degeneration and blood–brain barrier breakdown in apolipoprotein E4 carriers with Alzheimer’s disease. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 36, 216–227. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2015.44
Hamilton, N. B., Attwell, D., and Hall, C. N. (2010). Pericyte-mediated regulation of capillary diameter: a component of neurovascular coupling in health and disease. Front. Neuroenergetics. 2:5. doi: 10.3389/fnene.2010.00005
Hartmann, D. A., Underly, R. G., Grant, R. I., Watson, A. N., Lindner, V., and Shih, A. Y. (2015). Pericyte structure and distribution in the cerebral cortex revealed by high-resolution imaging of transgenic mice. Neurophotonics 2:041402. doi: 10.1117/1.nph.2.4.041402
Hashitani, H., and Lang, R. J. (2016). Spontaneous activity in the microvasculature of visceral organs: role of pericytes and voltage−dependent Ca2+ channels. J. Physiol. 594, 555–565. doi: 10.1113/jp271438
Hatterer, E., Davoust, N., Didier-Bazes, M., Vuaillat, C., Malcus, C., Belin, M. F., et al. (2006). How to drain without lymphatics? Dendritic cells migrate from the cerebrospinal fluid to the B-cell follicles of cervical lymph nodes. Blood 107, 806–812. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-01-0154
He, M., Dong, H., Huang, Y., Lu, S., Zhang, S., Qian, Y., et al. (2016). Astrocyte-derived CCL2 is associated with M1 activation and recruitment of cultured microglial cells. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 38, 859–870. doi: 10.1159/000443040
Hellström, M., Gerhardt, H., Kalén, M., Li, X., Eriksson, U., Wolburg, H., et al. (2001). Lack of pericytes leads to endothelial hyperplasia and abnormal vascular morphogenesis. J. Cell Biol. 153, 543–554. doi: 10.1083/jcb.153.3.543
Herland, A., van der Meer, A. D., FitzGerald, E. A., Park, T.-E., Sleeboom, J. J. F., and Ingber, D. E. (2016). Distinct contributions of astrocytes and pericytes to neuroinflammation identified in a 3D human blood-brain barrier on a chip. PLoS One 11:e0150360. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150360
Hesp, Z. C., Yoseph, R. Y., Suzuki, R., Jukkola, P., Wilson, C., Nishiyama, A., et al. (2018). Proliferating NG2 cell-dependent angiogenesis and scar formation alter axon growth and functional recovery after spinal cord injury in mice. J. Neurosci. 38, 1366–1382. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.3953-16.2017
Hill, R. A., Tong, L., Yuan, P., Murikinati, S., Gupta, S., and Grutzendler, J. (2015). Regional blood flow in the normal and ischemic brain is controlled by arteriolar smooth muscle cell contractility and not by capillary pericytes. Neuron 87, 95–110. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.06.001
Hladky, S. B., and Barrand, M. A. (2019). Is solute movement within the extracellular spaces of brain gray matter brought about primarily by diffusion or flow? A commentary on “Analysis of convective and diffusive transport in the brain interstitium” Fluids and Barriers of the CNS (2019) 16:6 by L. Ray, J.J. Iliff and J.J. Heys. Fluids Barriers CNS 16:24. doi: 10.1186/s12987-019-0141-x
Holter, K. E., Kehlet, B., Devor, A., Sejnowski, T. J., Dale, A. M., Omholt, S. W., et al. (2017). Interstitial solute transport in 3D reconstructed neuropil occurs by diffusion rather than bulk flow. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 114, 9894–9899. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1706942114
Hughes, S., and Chan-Ling, T. (2004). Characterization of smooth muscle cell and pericyte differentiation in the rat retina in vivo. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 45, 2795–2806. doi: 10.1167/iovs.03-1312
Hunter, J. M., Kwan, J., Malek-Ahmadi, M., Maarouf, C. L., Kokjohn, T. A., Belden, C., et al. (2012). Morphological and pathological evolution of the brain microcirculation in aging and Alzheimer’s disease. PLoS One. 7:e36893. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036893
Iliff, J. J., Wang, M., Liao, Y., Plogg, B. A., Peng, W., Gundersen, G. A., et al. (2012). A paravascular pathway facilitates CSF flow through the brain parenchyma and the clearance of interstitial solutes, including amyloid beta. Sci. Transl. Med. 4:147ra111. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3003748
Iris, A., Christian, H., Nikolaos, S., Ajna, B., Truman, R. B., and Yaakov, S. (2007). Multivariate and univariate analysis of continuous arterial spin labeling perfusion MRI in Alzheimer’s disease. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 28, 725–736. doi: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600570
Iturria-Medina, Y., Sotero, R. C., Toussaint, P. J., Mateos-Perez, J. M., and Evans, A. C. (2016). Early role of vascular dysregulation on late-onset Alzheimer’s disease based on multifactorial data-driven analysis. Nat. Commun. 7:11934. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11934
Jian, H., Shi-Ting, L., Qi, L., Qing-Gang, P., Fei, G., and Mei-Xiu, D. (2003). Vascular endothelial growth factor expression and angiogenesis induced by chronic cerebral hypoperfusion in rat brain. Neurosurgery 53, 963–972. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000083594.10117.7a
Jin, B. J., Smith, A. J., and Verkman, A. S. (2016). Spatial model of convective solute transport in brain extracellular space does not support a “glymphatic” mechanism. J. Gen. Physiol. 148, 489–501. doi: 10.1085/jgp.201611684
Khennouf, L., Gesslein, B., Brazhe, A., Octeau, J. C., Kutuzov, N., Khakh, B. S., et al. (2018). Active role of capillary pericytes during stimulation-induced activity and spreading depolarization. Brain 141, 2032–2046. doi: 10.1093/brain/awy143
Kida, S., Pantazis, A., and Weller, R. O. (1993). CSF drains directly from the subarachnoid space into nasal lymphatics in the rat. Anatomy, histology and immunological significance. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 19, 480–488. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2990.1993.tb00476.x
Kinney, J. W., Bemiller, S. M., Murtishaw, A. S., Leisgang, A. M., Salazar, A. M., and Lamb, B. T. (2018). Inflammation as a central mechanism in Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. Transl. Res. Clin. Interv. 4, 575–590. doi: 10.1016/j.trci.2018.06.014
Kishida, N., Maki, T., Takagi, Y., Yasuda, K., Kinoshita, H., Ayaki, T., et al. (2019). Role of perivascular oligodendrocyte precursor cells in angiogenesis after brain ischemia. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 8:e011824. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.011824
Kisler, K., Nelson, A. R., Montagne, A., and Zlokovic, B. V. (2017a). Cerebral blood flow regulation and neurovascular dysfunction in Alzheimer disease. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 18, 419–434. doi: 10.1038/nrn.2017.48
Kisler, K., Nelson, A. R., Rege, S. V., Ramanathan, A., Wang, Y., Ahuja, A., et al. (2017b). Pericyte degeneration leads to neurovascular uncoupling and limits oxygen supply to brain. Nat. Neurosci. 20, 406–416. doi: 10.1038/nn.4489
Kisler, K., Nikolakopoulou, A. M., Sweeney, M. D., Lazic, D., Zhao, Z., and Zlokovic, B. V. (2020). Acute ablation of cortical pericytes leads to rapid neurovascular uncoupling. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 14:27. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2020.00027
Kitaguchi, H., Ihara, M., Saiki, H., Takahashi, R., and Tomimoto, H. (2007). Capillary beds are decreased in Alzheimer’s disease, but not in Binswanger’s disease. Neurosci. Lett. 417, 128–131. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2007.02.021
Kitaguchi, H., Tomimoto, H., Ihara, M., Shibata, M., Uemura, K., Kalaria, R. N., et al. (2009). Chronic cerebral hypoperfusion accelerates amyloid beta deposition in APPSwInd transgenic mice. Brain Res. 1294, 202–210. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.07.078
Kovac, A., Erickson, M. A., and Banks, W. A. (2011). Brain microvascular pericytes are immunoactive in culture: cytokine, chemokine, nitric oxide, and LRP-1 expression in response to lipopolysaccharide. J. Neuroinflamm. 8:139. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-8-139
Kuhnert, F., Mancuso, M. R., Shamloo, A., Wang, H. T., Choksi, V., Florek, M., et al. (2010). Essential regulation of CNS angiogenesis by the orphan G protein-coupled receptor GPR124. Science 330, 985–989. doi: 10.1126/science.1196554
Kunz, J., Krause, D., Marian, K., and Dermietzel, R. (1994). The 140-kDa protein of blood-brain barrier-associated pericytes is identical to aminopeptidase. N. J. Neurochem. 62, 2375–2386. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1994.62062375.x
Leijenaar, J. F., van Maurik, I. S., Kuijer, J. P. A., van der Flier, W. M., Scheltens, P., Barkhof, F., et al. (2017). Lower cerebral blood flow in subjects with Alzheimer’s dementia, mild cognitive impairment, and subjective cognitive decline using two-dimensional phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging. Alzheimers Dement. Transl. Res. Clin. Interv. 9, 76–83. doi: 10.1016/j.dadm.2017.10.001
Lendahl, U., Nilsson, P., and Betsholtz, C. (2019). Emerging links between cerebrovascular and neurodegenerative diseases-a special role for pericytes. EMBO Rep. 20:e48070. doi: 10.15252/embr.201948070
Li, F., Lan, Y., Wang, Y., Wang, J., Yang, G., Meng, F., et al. (2011). Endothelial Smad4 maintains cerebrovascular integrity by activating N-cadherin through cooperation with notch. Dev. Cell 20, 291–302. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.01.011
Liu, C., Ge, H.-M., Liu, B.-H., Dong, R., Shan, K., Chen, X., et al. (2019). Targeting pericyte–endothelial cell crosstalk by circular RNA-cPWWP2A inhibition aggravates diabetes-induced microvascular dysfunction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 116, 7455–7464. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1814874116
Liu, H., Zhang, W., Kennard, S., Caldwell, R. B., and Lilly, B. (2010). Notch3 is critical for proper angiogenesis and mural cell investment. Circ. Res. 107, 860–870. doi: 10.1161/circresaha.110.218271
Liu, Q., Radwanski, R., Babadjouni, R., Patel, A., Hodis, D. M., Baumbacher, P., et al. (2019). Experimental chronic cerebral hypoperfusion results in decreased pericyte coverage and increased blood–brain barrier permeability in the corpus callosum. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 39, 240–250. doi: 10.1177/0271678x17743670
Liu, Y., Wada, R., Yamashita, T., Mi, Y., Deng, C. X., Hobson, J. P., et al. (2000). Edg-1, the G protein-coupled receptor for sphingosine-1-phosphate, is essential for vascular maturation. J. Clin. Invest. 106, 951–961. doi: 10.1172/jci10905
Louveau, A., Smirnov, I., Keyes, T. J., Eccles, J. D., Rouhani, S. J., Peske, J. D., et al. (2015). Structural and functional features of central nervous system lymphatic vessels. Nature 523, 337–341. doi: 10.1038/nature14432
Luissint, A.-C., Artus, C., Glacial, F., Ganeshamoorthy, K., and Couraud, P.-O. (2012). Tight junctions at the blood brain barrier: physiological architecture and disease-associated dysregulation. Fluids Barriers CNS 9:23. doi: 10.1186/2045-8118-9-23
Ma, Q., Zhao, Z., Sagare, A. P., Wu, Y., Wang, M., Owens, N., et al. (2018). Blood-brain barrier-associated pericytes internalize and clear aggregated amyloid-β42 by LRP1-dependent apolipoprotein E isoform-specific mechanism. Mol. Neurodegener. 13:57. doi: 10.1186/s13024-018-0286-0
Maki, T., Choi, Y. K., Miyamoto, N., Shindo, A., Liang, A. C., Ahn, B. J., et al. (2018). A-kinase anchor protein 12 is required for oligodendrocyte differentiation in adult white matter. Stem Cells 36, 751–760. doi: 10.1002/stem.2771
Maki, T., Maeda, M., Uemura, M., Lo, E. K., Terasaki, Y., Liang, A. C., et al. (2015). Potential interactions between pericytes and oligodendrocyte precursor cells in perivascular regions of cerebral white matter. Neurosci. Lett. 597, 164–169. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2015.04.047
Makihara, N., Arimura, K., Ago, T., Tachibana, M., Nishimura, A., Nakamura, K., et al. (2015). Involvement of platelet-derived growth factor receptor β in fibrosis through extracellular matrix protein production after ischemic stroke. Exp. Neurol. 264, 127–134. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2014.12.007
Matsumoto, J., Dohgu, S., Takata, F., Machida, T., Hatip, F. F., Hatip-Al-Khatib, I., et al. (2018). TNF-α-sensitive brain pericytes activate microglia by releasing IL-6 through cooperation between IκB-NFκB and JAK-STAT3 pathways. Brain Res. 1692, 34–44. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2018.04.023
Matsumoto, J., Takata, F., Machida, T., Takahashi, H., Soejima, Y., Funakoshi, M., et al. (2014). Tumor necrosis factor-alpha-stimulated brain pericytes possess a unique cytokine and chemokine release profile and enhance microglial activation. Neurosci. Lett. 578, 133–138. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2014.06.052
Mazza, M., Marano, G., Traversi, G., Bria, P., and Mazza, S. (2011). Primary cerebral blood flow deficiency and Alzheimer’s disease: shadows and lights. J. Alzheimers Dis. 23, 375–389. doi: 10.3233/jad-2010-090700
McGuire, P. G., Rangasamy, S., Maestas, J., and Das, A. (2011). Pericyte-derived sphingosine 1-phosphate induces the expression of adhesion proteins and modulates the retinal endothelial cell barrier. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 31, e107–e115. doi: 10.1161/atvbaha.111.235408
Menezes, M. J., McClenahan, F. K., Leiton, C. V., Aranmolate, A., Shan, X., and Colognato, H. (2014). The extracellular matrix protein laminin α2 regulates the maturation and function of the blood–brain barrier. J. Neurosci. 34, 15260–15280. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.3678-13.2014
Miners, J. S., Kehoe, P. G., Love, S., Zetterberg, H., and Blennow, K. (2019). CSF evidence of pericyte damage in Alzheimer’s disease is associated with markers of blood-brain barrier dysfunction and disease pathology. Alzheimers Res. Ther. 11:81. doi: 10.1186/s13195-019-0534-8
Min-Soo, K., Bo-Ryoung, C., Yong Woo, L., Dong-Hee, K., Ye Sun, H., Won Kyung, J., et al. (2018). Chronic cerebral hypoperfusion induces alterations of matrix metalloproteinase-9 and angiopoietin-2 levels in the rat hippocampus. Exp. Neurobiol. 27, 299–308. doi: 10.5607/en.2018.27.4.299
Mishra, A., Reynolds, J. P., Chen, Y., Gourine, A. V., Rusakov, D. A., and Attwell, D. (2016). Astrocytes mediate neurovascular signaling to capillary pericytes but not to arterioles. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 1619–1627. doi: 10.1038/nn.4428
Montagne, A., Barnes, S. R., Sweeney, M. D., Halliday, M. R., Sagare, A. P., Zhao, Z., et al. (2015). Blood-brain barrier breakdown in the aging human hippocampus. Neuron 85, 296–302. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.12.032
Montagne, A., Nikolakopoulou, A. M., Zhao, Z., Sagare, A. P., Si, G., Lazic, D., et al. (2018). Pericyte degeneration causes white matter dysfunction in the mouse central nervous system. Nat. Med. 24, 326–337. doi: 10.1038/nm.4482
Morris, A. W., Sharp, M. M., Albargothy, N. J., Fernandes, R., Hawkes, C. A., Verma, A., et al. (2016). Vascular basement membranes as pathways for the passage of fluid into and out of the brain. Acta Neuropathol. 131, 725–736. doi: 10.1007/s00401-016-1555-z
Munk, A., Wang, W., Bèchet, N., Eltanahy, A. M., Cheng, A., Sigurdsson, B., et al. (2019). PDGF-B Is required for development of the glymphatic system. Cell Rep. 26, 2955–2969.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.02.050
Murfee, W. L., Skalak, T. C., and Peirce, S. M. (2005). Differential arterial/venous expression of NG2 proteoglycan in perivascular cells along microvessels: identifying a venule−specific phenotype. Microcirculation 12, 151–160. doi: 10.1080/10739680590904955
Nakagawa, S., Deli, M. A., Kawaguchi, H., Shimizudani, T., Shimono, T., Kittel, A., et al. (2009). A new blood-brain barrier model using primary rat brain endothelial cells, pericytes and astrocytes. Neurochem. Int. 54, 253–263. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2008.12.002
Nakagomi, T., Kubo, S., Nakano-Doi, A., Sakuma, R., Lu, S., Narita, A., et al. (2015a). Brain vascular pericytes following ischemia have multipotential stem cell activity to differentiate into neural and vascular lineage cells. Stem Cells (Dayton, Ohio) 33, 1962–1974. doi: 10.1002/stem.1977
Nakagomi, T., Nakano-Doi, A., Kawamura, M., and Matsuyama, T. (2015b). Do vascular pericytes contribute to neurovasculogenesis in the central nervous system as multipotent vascular stem cells? Stem Cells Dev. 24, 1730–1739. doi: 10.1089/scd.2015.0039
Nation, D. A., Sweeney, M. D., Montagne, A., Sagare, A. P., D’Orazio, L. M., Pachicano, M., et al. (2019). Blood–brain barrier breakdown is an early biomarker of human cognitive dysfunction. Nat. Med. 25, 270–276. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0297-y
Neuhaus, A. A., Couch, Y., Sutherland, B. A., and Buchan, A. M. (2017). Novel method to study pericyte contractility and responses to ischaemia in vitro using electrical impedance. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 37, 2013–2024. doi: 10.1177/0271678X16659495
Nikolakopoulou, A. M., Montagne, A., Kisler, K., Dai, Z., Wang, Y., Huuskonen, M. T., et al. (2019). Pericyte loss leads to circulatory failure and pleiotrophin depletion causing neuron loss. Nat. Neurosci. 22, 1089–1098. doi: 10.1038/s41593-019-0434-z
Nishimura, A., Ago, T., Kuroda, J., Arimura, K., Tachibana, M., Nakamura, K., et al. (2016). Detrimental role of pericyte Nox4 in the acute phase of brain ischemia. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 36, 1143–1154. doi: 10.1177/0271678X15606456
Nomura, Y., Faegle, R., Hori, D., Al-Qamari, A., Nemeth, J. A., Gottesman, R., et al. (2018). Cerebral small vessel, but not large vessel disease, is associated with impaired cerebral autoregulation during cardiopulmonary bypass. Anesth. Analg. 127, 1314–1322. doi: 10.1213/ane.0000000000003384
Nonaka, H., Akima, M., Hatori, T., Nagayama, T., Zhang, Z., and Ihara, F. (2003). The microvasculature of the cerebral white matter: arteries of the subcortical white matter. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 62, 154–161. doi: 10.1093/jnen/62.2.154
Nortley, R., Korte, N., Izquierdo, P., Hirunpattarasilp, C., Mishra, A., Jaunmuktane, Z., et al. (2019). Amyloid beta oligomers constrict human capillaries in Alzheimer’s disease via signaling to pericytes. Science 365:eaav9518. doi: 10.1126/science.aav9518
O’Farrell, F. M., Mastitskaya, S., Hammond-Haley, M., Freitas, F., Wah, W. R., and Attwell, D. (2017). Capillary pericytes mediate coronary no-reflow after myocardial ischaemia. eLife 6:e29280. doi: 10.7554/elife.29280
Ogura, S., Kurata, K., Hattori, Y., Takase, H., Ishiguro-Oonuma, T., Hwang, Y., et al. (2017). Sustained inflammation after pericyte depletion induces irreversible blood-retina barrier breakdown. JCI Insight 2:e90905. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.90905
Ohtaki, H., Fujimoto, T., Sato, T., Kishimoto, K., Fujimoto, M., Moriya, M., et al. (2006). “Progressive expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and angiogenesis after chronic ischemic hypoperfusion in rat,” in Brain Edema Acta Neurochirurgica Supplementum, Vol. 96, eds J. T. Hoff, R. F. Keep, and Y. Hua (Vienna: Springer), 283–287. doi: 10.1007/3-211-30714-1_61
Omote, Y., Deguchi, K., Kono, S., Liu, N., Liu, W., Kurata, T., et al. (2014). Neurovascular protection of cilostazol in stroke-prone spontaneous hypertensive rats associated with angiogenesis and pericyte proliferation. J. Neurosci. Res. 92, 369–374. doi: 10.1002/jnr.23327
Østergaard, L., Engedal, T. S., Moreton, F., Hansen, M. B., Wardlaw, J. M., Dalkara, T., et al. (2016). Cerebral small vessel disease: capillary pathways to stroke and cognitive decline. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 36, 302–325. doi: 10.1177/0271678x15606723
Özen, I., Deierborg, T., Miharada, K., Padel, T., Englund, E., Genové, G., et al. (2014). Brain pericytes acquire a microglial phenotype after stroke. Acta Neuropathol. 128, 381–396. doi: 10.1007/s00401-014-1295-x
Paik, J.-H., Skoura, A., Chae, S.-S., Cowan, A. E., Han, D. K., Proia, R. L., et al. (2004). Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor regulation of N-cadherin mediates vascular stabilization. Genes Dev. 18, 2392–2403. doi: 10.1101/gad.1227804
Park, J. H., Hong, J. H., Lee, S. W., Ji, H. D., Jung, J. A., Yoon, K. W., et al. (2019). The effect of chronic cerebral hypoperfusion on the pathology of Alzheimer’s disease: a positron emission tomography study in rats. Sci. Rep. 9:14102. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-50681-4
Pieper, C., Marek, J., Unterberg, M., Schwerdtle, T., and Galla, H.-J. (2014). Brain capillary pericytes contribute to the immune defense in response to cytokines or LPS in vitro. Brain Res. 1550, 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2014.01.004
Pieper, C., Pieloch, P., and Galla, H. J. (2013). Pericytes support neutrophil transmigration via interleukin-8 across a porcine co-culture model of the blood-brain barrier. Brain Res. 1524, 1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2013.05.047
Pollock, H., Jutchings, M., Weller, R. O., and Zhang, E.-T. (1997). Perivascular spaces in the basal ganglia of the human brain: their relationship to lacunes. J. Anat. 191, 337–346. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-7580.1997.19130337.x
Proebstl, D., Voisin, M.-B., Woodfin, A., Whiteford, J., D’Acquisto, F., Jones, G. E., et al. (2012). Pericytes support neutrophil subendothelial cell crawling and breaching of venular walls in vivo. J. Exp. Med. 209, 1219–1234. doi: 10.1084/jem.20111622
Rajani, R. M., Ratelade, J., Domenga-Denier, V., Hase, Y., Kalimo, H., Kalaria, R. N., et al. (2019). Blood brain barrier leakage is not a consistent feature of white matter lesions in CADASIL. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 7:187. doi: 10.1186/s40478-019-0844-x
Rajantie, I., Ilmonen, M., Alminaite, A., Ozerdem, U., Alitalo, K., and Salven, P. (2004). Adult bone marrow-derived cells recruited during angiogenesis comprise precursors for periendothelial vascular mural cells. Blood 104, 2084–2086. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-01-0336
Renner, O., Tsimpas, A., Kostin, S., Valable, S., Petit, E., Schaper, W., et al. (2003). Time- and cell type-specific induction of platelet-derived growth factor receptor-β during cerebral ischemia. Mol. Brain Res. 113, 44–51. doi: 10.1016/S0169-328X(03)00085-8
Rudziak, P., Ellis, C. G., and Kowalewska, P. M. (2019). Role and molecular mechanisms of pericytes in regulation of leukocyte diapedesis in inflamed tissues. Mediat. Inflamm. 2019, 1–9. doi: 10.1155/2019/4123605
Rungta, R. L., Chaigneau, E., Osmanski, B.-F., and Charpak, S. (2018). Vascular compartmentalization of functional hyperemia from the synapse to the pia. Neuron. 99, 362–375.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.06.012
Rustenhoven, J., Aalderink, M., Scotter, E. L., Oldfield, R. L., Bergin, P. S., Mee, E. W., et al. (2016). TGF-beta1 regulates human brain pericyte inflammatory processes involved in neurovasculature function. J. Neuroinflamm. 13:37. doi: 10.1186/s12974-016-0503-0
Ryu, J., Petersen, M. A., Murray, S. G., Baeten, K. M., Meyer-Franke, A., Chan, J. P., et al. (2015). Blood coagulation protein fibrinogen promotes autoimmunity and demyelination via chemokine release and antigen presentation. Nat. Commun. 6:8164. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9164
Sagare, A. P., Bell, R. D., Zhao, Z., Ma, Q., Winkler, E. A., Ramanathan, A., et al. (2013). Pericyte loss influences Alzheimer-like neurodegeneration in mice. Nat. Commun. 4:2932. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3932
Sakuma, R., Kawahara, M., Nakano-Doi, A., Takahashi, A., Tanaka, Y., Narita, A., et al. (2016). Brain pericytes serve as microglia-generating multipotent vascular stem cells following ischemic stroke. J. Neuroinflamm. 13:57. doi: 10.1186/s12974-016-0523-9
Sandison, J. C. (1931). Observations of the circulating blood cells, adventitial (Rouget) cells and muscle cells, endothelium and macrophages in the transparent chamber of the rabbit’s ear. Anat. Rec. 50, 355–379.
Sengillo, J. D., Winkler, E. A., Walker, C. T., Sullivan, J. S., Johnson, M., and Zlokovic, B. V. (2013). Deficiency in mural vascular cells coincides with blood–brain barrier disruption in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Pathol. 23, 303–310. doi: 10.1111/bpa.12004
Seo, J., Maki, T., Maeda, M., Miyamoto, N., Liang, A. C., Hayakawa, K., et al. (2014). Oligodendrocyte precursor cells support blood-brain barrier integrity via TGF-β signaling. PLoS One 9:e103174. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103174
Seo, J., Miyamoto, N., Hayakawa, K., Pham, L.-D. D., Maki, T., Ayata, C., et al. (2013). Oligodendrocyte precursors induce early blood-brain barrier opening after white matter injury. J. Clin. Invest. 123, 782–786. doi: 10.1172/jci65863
Shen, J., Xu, G., Zhu, R., Yuan, J., Ishii, Y., Hamashima, T., et al. (2019). PDGFR-β restores blood-brain barrier functions in a mouse model of focal cerebral ischemia. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 39, 1501–1515. doi: 10.1177/0271678x18769515
Shibata, M., Yamada, S., Kumar, R. S., Calero, M., Bading, J., Frangione, B., et al. (2000). Clearance of Alzheimer’s amyloid-β1-40 peptide from brain by LDL receptor–related protein-1 at the blood-brain barrier. J. Clin. Invest. 106, 1489–1499. doi: 10.1172/jci10498
Shigemoto-Mogami, Y., Hoshikawa, K., and Sato, K. (2018). Activated microglia disrupt the blood-brain barrier and induce chemokines and cytokines in a rat in vitro model. Front. Cell Neurosci. 12:494. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2018.00494
Silva, M., Lange, S., Hinrichsen, B., Philp, A. R., Reyes, C. R., Halabi, D., et al. (2019). Pericytes favor oligodendrocyte fate choice in adult neural stem cells. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 13:85. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2019.00085
Simpkins, A. N., Dias, C., Leigh, R., Benson, R. T., Hsia, A. W., Latour, L. L., et al. (2016). Identification of reversible disruption of the human blood–brain barrier following acute ischemia. Stroke 47, 2405–2408. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.116.013805
Smith, A. J., Yao, X., Dix, J. A., Jin, B. J., and Verkman, A. S. (2017). Test of the ‘glymphatic’ hypothesis demonstrates diffusive and aquaporin-4-independent solute transport in rodent brain parenchyma. Elife 6:e27679. doi: 10.7554/eLife.27679
Smyth, L., Rustenhoven, J., Scotter, E. L., Schweder, P., Faull, R., Park, T., et al. (2018). Markers for human brain pericytes and smooth muscle cells. J. Chem. Neuroanat. 92, 48–60. doi: 10.1016/j.jchemneu.2018.06.001
Smyth, L. C. D., Rustenhoven, J., Park, T., Schweder, P., Jansson, D., Heppner, P. A., et al. (2018). Unique and shared inflammatory profiles of human brain endothelia and pericytes. J. Neuroinflamm. 15:138. doi: 10.1186/s12974-018-1167-8
Song, S., Ewald, A. J., Stallcup, W., Werb, Z., and Bergers, G. (2005). PDGFRβ+ perivascular progenitor cells in tumours regulate pericyte differentiation and vascular survival. Nat. Cell Biol. 7, 870–879. doi: 10.1038/ncb1288
Spector, R., Robert Snodgrass, S., and Johanson, C. E. (2015). A balanced view of the cerebrospinal fluid composition and functions: focus on adult humans. Exp. Neurol. 273, 57–68. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2015.07.027
Stapor, P. C., Sweat, R. S., Dashti, D. C., Betancourt, A. M., and Murfee, W. (2014). Pericyte dynamics during angiogenesis: new insights from new identities. J. Vasc. Res. 51, 163–174. doi: 10.1159/000362276
Stark, K., Eckart, A., Haidari, S., Tirniceriu, A., Lorenz, M., von Brühl, M.-L., et al. (2013). Capillary and arteriolar pericytes attract innate leukocytes exiting through venules and ‘instruct’ them with pattern-recognition and motility programs. Nat. Immunol. 14, 41–51. doi: 10.1038/ni.2477
Staszewski, J., Piusiñska-Macoch, R., Brodacki, B., Skrobowska, E., Macek, K., and Stêpieñ, A. (2017). Risk of vascular events in different manifestations of cerebral small vessel disease: a 2-year follow-up study with a control group. Heliyon 3:e00455. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2017.e00455
Stebbins, M. J., Gastfriend, B. D., Canfield, S. G., Lee, M.-S., Richards, D., Faubion, M. G., et al. (2019). Human pluripotent stem cell–derived brain pericyte–like cells induce blood-brain barrier properties. Sci. Adv. 5:eaau7375. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aau7375
Sundberg, C., Kowanetz, M., Brown, L. F., Detmar, M., and Dvorak, H. F. (2002). Stable expression of angiopoietin-1 and other markers by cultured pericytes: phenotypic similarities to a subpopulation of cells in maturing vessels during later stages of angiogenesis in vivo. Lab. Invest. 82, 387–401. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.3780433
Sweeney, M. D., Kisler, K., Montagne, A., Toga, A. W., and Zlokovic, B. V. (2018). The role of brain vasculature in neurodegenerative disorders. Nat. Neurosci. 21, 1318–1331. doi: 10.1038/s41593-018-0234-x
Tachibana, M., Yamazaki, Y., Liu, C.-C., Bu, G., and Kanekiyo, T. (2018). Pericyte implantation in the brain enhances cerebral blood flow and reduces amyloid-β pathology in amyloid model mice. Exp. Neurol. 300, 13–21. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2017.10.023
Takagi, T., Imai, T., Mishiro, K., Ishisaka, M., Tsujimoto, M., Ito, H., et al. (2017). Cilostazol ameliorates collagenase-induced cerebral hemorrhage by protecting the blood-brain barrier. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 37, 123–139. doi: 10.1177/0271678X15621499
Tallquist, M. D., French, W. J., and Soriano, P. (2003). Additive effects of PDGF receptor beta signaling pathways in vascular smooth muscle cell development. PLoS Biol. 1:E52. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0000052
Teichert, M., Milde, L., Holm, A., Stanicek, L., Gengenbacher, N., Savant, S., et al. (2017). Pericyte-expressed Tie2 controls angiogenesis and vessel maturation. Nat. Commun. 8:16106. doi: 10.1038/ncomms16106
Thurgur, H., and Pinteaux, E. (2019). Microglia in the neurovascular unit: blood-brain barrier-microglia interactions after central nervous system disorders. Neuroscience 405, 55–67. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.06.046
Tsai, H.-H., Niu, J., Munji, R., Davalos, D., Chang, J., Zhang, H., et al. (2016). Oligodendrocyte precursors migrate along vasculature in the developing nervous system. Science 351, 379–384. doi: 10.1126/science.aad3839
Uemura, M. T., Ihara, M., Maki, T., Nakagomi, T., Kaji, S., Uemura, K., et al. (2018). Pericyte-derived bone morphogenetic protein 4 underlies white matter damage after chronic hypoperfusion. Brain Pathol. 28, 521–535. doi: 10.1111/bpa.12523
Ueno, M., Tomimoto, H., Akiguchi, I., Wakita, H., and Sakamoto, H. (2002). Blood–brain barrier disruption in white matter lesions in a rat model of chronic cerebral hypoperfusion. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 22, 97–104. doi: 10.1097/00004647-200201000-00012
Underly, R. G., Levy, M., Hartmann, D. A., Grant, R. I., Watson, A. N., and Shih, A. Y. (2017). Pericytes as inducers of rapid, matrix metalloproteinase-9-dependent capillary damage during ischemia. J. Neurosci. 37, 129–140. doi: 10.1523/Jneurosci.2891-16.2016
Vanlandewijck, M., He, L., Mäe, M., Andrae, J., Ando, K., Gaudio, F., et al. (2018). A molecular atlas of cell types and zonation in the brain vasculature. Nature 554, 475–480. doi: 10.1038/nature25739
Walshe, T. E., Saint-Geniez, M., Maharaj, A. S., Sekiyama, E., Maldonado, A. E., and D’Amore, P. A. (2009). TGF-beta is required for vascular barrier function, endothelial survival and homeostasis of the adult microvasculature. PLoS One 4:e5149. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005149
Wan, Y., Jin, H. J., Zhu, Y. Y., Fang, Z., Mao, L., He, Q., et al. (2018). MicroRNA-149-5p regulates blood–brain barrier permeability after transient middle cerebral artery occlusion in rats by targeting S1PR2 of pericytes. FASEB J. 32, 3133–3148.
Winkler, E. A., Bell, R. D., and Zlokovic, B. V. (2010). Pericyte-specific expression of PDGF beta receptor in mouse models with normal and deficient PDGF beta receptor signaling. Mol. Neurodegener. 5:32. doi: 10.1186/1750-1326-5-32
Winkler, E. A., Sengillo, J. D., Sullivan, J. S., Henkel, J. S., Appel, S. H., and Zlokovic, B. V. (2013). Blood–spinal cord barrier breakdown and pericyte reductions in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Acta Neuropathol. 125, 111–120. doi: 10.1007/s00401-012-1039-8
Wong, S.-P., Rowley, J. E., Redpath, A. N., Tilman, J. D., Fellous, T. G., and Johnson, J. R. (2015). Pericytes, mesenchymal stem cells and their contributions to tissue repair. Pharmacol. Ther. 151, 107–120. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2015.03.006
Xing, C.-Y., Tarumi, T., Liu, J., Zhang, Y., Turner, M., Riley, J., et al. (2017). Distribution of cardiac output to the brain across the adult lifespan. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 37, 2848–2856. doi: 10.1177/0271678x16676826
Yamada, M., Ihara, M., Okamoto, Y., Maki, T., Washida, K., Kitamura, A., et al. (2011). The influence of chronic cerebral hypoperfusion on cognitive function and amyloid β metabolism in APP overexpressing mice. PLoS One 6:e16567. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016567
Yanagida, K., Liu, C. H., Faraco, G., Galvani, S., Smith, H. K., Burg, N., et al. (2017). Size-selective opening of the blood-brain barrier by targeting endothelial sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor 1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 114, 4531–4536. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1618659114
Yang, S., Jin, H., Zhu, Y., Wan, Y., Opoku, E., Zhu, L., et al. (2017). Diverse functions and mechanisms of pericytes in ischemic stroke. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 15, 892–905. doi: 10.2174/1570159x15666170112170226
Yang, Y., Andersson, P., Hosaka, K., Zhang, Y., Cao, R., Iwamoto, H., et al. (2016). The PDGF-BB-SOX7 axis-modulated IL-33 in pericytes and stromal cells promotes metastasis through tumour-associated macrophages. Nat. Commun. 7:11385. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11385
Yao, Y., Chen, Z.-L., Norris, E. H., and Strickland, S. (2014). Astrocytic laminin regulates pericyte differentiation and maintains blood brain barrier integrity. Nat. Commun. 5:3413. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4413
Yemisci, M., Gursoy-Ozdemir, Y., Vural, A., Can, A., Topalkara, K., and Dalkara, T. (2009). Pericyte contraction induced by oxidative-nitrative stress impairs capillary reflow despite successful opening of an occluded cerebral artery. Nat. Med. 15, 1031–1037. doi: 10.1038/nm.2022
Yokota, K., Kobayakawa, K., Saito, T., Hara, M., Kijima, K., Ohkawa, Y., et al. (2017). Periostin promotes scar formation through the interaction between pericytes and infiltrating monocytes/macrophages after spinal cord injury. Am. J. Pathol. 187, 639–653. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2016.11.010
Yuan, H., Khankin, E. V., Karumanchi, A. S., and Parikh, S. M. (2009). Angiopoietin 2 is a partial agonist/antagonist of Tie2 signaling in the endothelium. Mol. Cell. Biol. 29, 2011–2022. doi: 10.1128/mcb.01472-08
Zechariah, A., ElAli, A., Doeppner, T. R., Jin, F., Hasan, M. R., Helfrich, I., et al. (2013). Vascular endothelial growth factor promotes pericyte coverage of brain capillaries, improves cerebral blood flow during subsequent focal cerebral ischemia, and preserves the metabolic penumbra. Stroke 44, 1690–1697. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000240
Zeisel, A., Hochgerner, H., Lönnerberg, P., Johnsson, A., Memic, F., Zwan, J. V. D., et al. (2018). Molecular architecture of the mouse nervous system. Cell 174, 999–1014.e1022. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.06.021
Zenker, D., Begley, D., Bratzke, H., Rübsamen-Waigmann, H., and von Briesen, H. (2003). Human blood-derived macrophages enhance barrier function of cultured primary bovine and human brain capillary endothelial cells. J. Physiol. 551, 1023–1032. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.045880
Zhang, L., Tan, J., Jiang, X., Qian, W., Yang, T., Sun, X., et al. (2017). Neuron-derived CCL2 contributes to microglia activation and neurological decline in hepatic encephalopathy. Biol. Res. 50:26. doi: 10.1186/s40659-017-0130-y
Zheng Gang, Z., Li, Z., Quan, J., Ruilan, Z., Kenneth, D., Cecylia, P., et al. (2000). VEGF enhances angiogenesis and promotes blood-brain barrier leakage in the ischemic brain. J. Clin. Invest. 106, 829–838. doi: 10.1172/jci9369
Zhu, Y., Soderblom, C., Krishnan, V., Ashbaugh, J., Bethea, J. R., and Lee, J. K. (2015). Hematogenous macrophage depletion reduces the fibrotic scar and increases axonal growth after spinal cord injury. Neurobiol. Dis. 74, 114–125. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2014.10.024
Zlokovic, B. V., Deane, R., Sagare, A. P., Bell, R. D., and Winkler, E. A. (2010). Low−density lipoprotein receptor−related protein−1: a serial clearance homeostatic mechanism controlling Alzheimer’s amyloid β−peptide elimination from the brain. J. Neurochem. 115, 1077–1089. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2010.07002.x
Keywords: pericytes, mural cells, small vessel disease, vascular cognitive impairment and dementia, Alzheimer’s disease (AD), stroke, neurovascular coupling (NVC), blood–brain barrier (BBB)
Citation: Uemura MT, Maki T, Ihara M, Lee VMY and Trojanowski JQ (2020) Brain Microvascular Pericytes in Vascular Cognitive Impairment and Dementia. Front. Aging Neurosci. 12:80. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2020.00080
Received: 02 December 2019; Accepted: 04 March 2020;
Published: 14 April 2020.
Edited by:Roxana Octavia Carare, University of Southampton, United Kingdom
Reviewed by:David Attwell, University College London, United Kingdom
Kassandra Kisler, University of Southern California, United States
Copyright © 2020 Uemura, Maki, Ihara, Lee and Trojanowski. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Maiko T. Uemura, firstname.lastname@example.org