Microglia in Alzheimer’s Disease: A Target for Therapeutic Intervention
Guimei Zhang
Zicheng Wang1 
Li Sun- 1Department of Neurology and Neuroscience Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin University, Changchun, China
- 2Department of Intensive Care Unit, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Shandong, China
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is one of the most common types of age-related dementia worldwide. In addition to extracellular amyloid plaques and intracellular neurofibrillary tangles, dysregulated microglia also play deleterious roles in the AD pathogenesis. Numerous studies have demonstrated that unbridled microglial activity induces a chronic neuroinflammatory environment, promotes β-amyloid accumulation and tau pathology, and impairs microglia-associated mitophagy. Thus, targeting microglia may pave the way for new therapeutic interventions. This review provides a thorough overview of the pathophysiological role of the microglia in AD and illustrates the potential avenues for microglia-targeted therapies, including microglial modification, immunoreceptors, and anti-inflammatory drugs.
Introduction
Alzheimer’s Disease
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is one of the most common types of age-related dementia worldwide. It includes progressive cognitive deficits, impaired daily activities, and abnormal behavioral and psychological symptoms (Long and Holtzman, 2019). Due to the largely unknown etiology of AD and lack of efficient therapeutic approaches, a tremendous pressure has forced researchers to delve further into molecular and cellular pathways in an attempt to elucidate the pathogenesis of AD. In addition to extracellular amyloid plaques and intracellular neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs), gliosis and neuroinflammation also play deleterious roles in AD, implicating microglia in the disease process. Microglia are the main innate immune cells in the central nervous system (CNS) and act as guardians by responding to CNS infection or damage. Numerous studies have demonstrated that microglia have dual functions in the pathological process of AD and act in a context-dependent manner. The moderate activation of microglia under β-amyloid (Aβ) stimulation has neuroprotective effects. Some pattern recognition receptors expressed on the surface of microglia interact with neurotoxic Aβ to promote Aβ clearance from the brain. However, unbridled microglial activity can create a chronic neuroinflammatory environment, exacerbating neuronal and synaptic loss, tau pathology, and cognitive decline. Accumulating evidence suggests that dysfunctional microglia may actively contribute to AD pathogenesis. Thus, examining context-dependent microglial reactions may reveal potential avenues for the treatment of AD.
Development and Function of Microglia
Since the mystery of microglia was unveiled one century ago (Sierra et al., 2016), a longstanding debate on the origin of microglia began. Owing to various periods of brain development (embryonic, postnatal, and adult microglia) and ever-changing surroundings, microglial ontogeny has not yet been established. Contrary to astrocytes and oligodendrocytes derived from the neuroectoderm, microglia are tissue-resident macrophages that originate from the mesoderm during embryonic development (Sierra et al., 2016). The most consensual hypothesis is that microglia are derived from progenitors, that originate from the yolk sac (YS; Cuadros et al., 1993; Alliot et al., 1999; Bertrand et al., 2005; Gomez Perdiguero et al., 2015; Askew et al., 2017). Cuadros et al. (1993) suggested that ameboid microglia are derived from the YS extraembryonic precursors in the early stages of the avian CNS, independent of CNS vascularization. This result was later confirmed by Alliot et al. (1999) who reported potential microglial progenitors in the YS on murine embryonic day (E) 8. The extraembryonic YS is the first source of hematopoietic progenitors before blood circulation is established (E8.5; Palis et al., 1999). These hematopoietic progenitors then expand into the fetal liver, rapidly initiating intraembryonic hematopoiesis. Primitive and definitive hematopoietic progenitors arise from the YS between E7.0 and E9.5, migrate through the bloodstream, and expand in the fetal liver after E9.5 (Lux et al., 2008).
To date, the contribution of YS-derived cells to macrophage pools or microglia has been intensely investigated and is gaining increasing attention. Tissue macrophages are thought to originate from hematopoietic stem cells. However, Schulz et al. (2012) found a possible YS origin of macrophages. They reported a discrepancy in the genotype between a lineage of YS-derived tissue macrophages and the progeny of hematopoietic stem cells. They observed that the YS-derived cell population, including several tissue macrophages (microglia) can proliferate and renew them independently from the transcription factor Myb, which is required for hematopoietic stem cells development. Furthermore, Bertrand et al. (2005) found three pathways of macrophage maturation during the development of YS hematopoiesis. The first wave of macrophage population detected in the YS comprised maternal-derived cells with a mature phenotype of CD45+Mac-1+F4/80+. These macrophages observed in the early YS at 7.5–8 postcoital days with transient contribution to mature macrophages. The second wave population comprising monopotent-derived precursors appear later, at postcoital day 8 (2- to 4-somite stage), exhibiting a c-Kit+CD45− phenotype. Finally, erythromyeloid precursors constituted the third wave immediately following the second wave at the 4- to 6-somite stage with a similar phenotype (CD45−c-Kit+). These YS-derived macrophages may be instrumental in establishing resident tissue macrophages, including microglia. Recently, advances in fate mapping analysis have also provided further convincing evidence about the YS origin of microglia (Ginhoux et al., 2010; Gomez Perdiguero et al., 2015). Adequate understanding of microglial origin will help us achieve the therapeutic goal of repairing dysfunctional microglia.
As innate immune sentinels, microglia are important players in CNS homeostasis. In the in vitro settings, distinct phenotypic subpopulations of microglia are considered to independently perform their biological functions in response to different environmental cues (Martinez et al., 2008). For example, in response to stimulation with interferon (IFN)-γ and lipopolysaccharide (LPS), microglia shift from a quiescent to an activated state, which is referred to as classically activated M1 microglia. These M1 microglia release a plethora of pro-inflammatory mediators, contributing to the vicious cycle of chronic inflammation. Conversely, alternatively activated M2 phenotypes, stimulated by interleukin (IL)-4, play a neuroprotective role by releasing trophic factors, resolving inflammation, and phagocytosing harmful substances. Overall, in the complex pathological settings, activated microglia undergo either pro-inflammatory (M1) or anti-inflammatory (M2) phenotypic alterations; thus, these cells play a dualistic role in the battle of disease progression. Microglia are tissue-resident macrophages and studies of microglial polarization schemes often focus on macrophages. Traditionally, the M1 or M2 phenotype is considered as the extreme activation state of macrophages/microglia in response to different microenvironmental stimuli. However, with the advent of novel technologies, the M1/M2 polarization model is now considered less valid (Martinez et al., 2008; Xue et al., 2014; Ransohoff, 2016). A transcriptome-based network analysis extended the current M1/M2-polarization scheme by revealing a spectrum model with at least nine macrophage activation patterns (Xue et al., 2014). Notably, novel observations have revealed the detailed macrophage subsets: Mhem, Mox, MHb, and M4 (Chinetti-Gbaguidi et al., 2015; Nakai, 2021). Moreover, the M2 macrophages have been further subdivided into the M2a, M2b, M2c, and M2d subtypes (Chinetti-Gbaguidi et al., 2015; Nakai, 2021). These diverse macrophage subtypes respond to different microenvironmental stimuli and surface markers and thus have distinct biological functions (Figure 1). Most studies aimed at describing the phenotypes of macrophages/microglia are conducted mainly in vitro. However, whether all these subsets can be found in vivo remains uncertain. Understanding the function of these macrophages/microglia subtypes and their contribution to health or disease contributes to the design of novel strategies to hinder or reverse disease progression.
Figure 1. Microglia/Macrophage polarization subtypes. Traditionally, the M1 or M2 phenotype is considered as the extreme activation state of macrophages/microglia in response to different microenvironmental stimuli. Notably, novel observations have revealed the detailed macrophage subsets: Mhem, Mox, MHb, and M4. Moreover, the M2 macrophages have been further subdivided into the M2a, M2b, M2c, and M2d subtypes. MΦ, macrophages; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; IFN-γ, interferon-γ; IL, interleukin; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α; NO, nitric oxide; ROS, reactive oxygen species; CCL17, CC chemokine ligand 17; IGF, insulin-like growth factor; TGF-β, transforming growth factor-β; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; HMOX-1, heme oxygenase-1; COX2, cyclooxygenase-2; CXCL-4, chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand (CXCL) 4; MMP7, matrix metalloproteinase 7.
Since the active role of microglia as macrophages is well established, the main functional features of microglia, including proliferation, migration, and phagocytosis, have also been characterized (Sierra et al., 2016). Microglia undergo a wave of proliferation to maintain their stable density after arising from the YS. Recent evidence indicates that adult microglia can also maintain a stable number of cells according to their own population dynamics, rather than by peripherally infiltrating monocytes (Askew et al., 2017). Microglial homeostasis can be achieved by spatiotemporally coupled proliferation and apoptosis during their lifetime (Lawson et al., 1992; Askew et al., 2017). Direct evidence has identified some molecular regulators of microglial proliferation, including colony stimulating factor 1 (CSF1), CSF1 receptor (CSF1R), IL-34, the transcription factor PU.1, and IFN regulatory factor 8 (IRF8; Mizuno et al., 2011; Minten et al., 2012; Gómez-Nicola et al., 2013; Askew et al., 2017). To maintain CNS homeostasis, microglia vigilantly monitor the microenvironment with their extremely rapid mobility and highly dynamic motility. Based on well-coordinated cellular and molecular signaling (Franco-Bocanegra et al., 2019; Smolders et al., 2019), microglia rapidly exhibit “chemotactic motility” when encountering infection, insult, or tissue damage. After sensing potential hazards, microglia move in the direction of the cue, under the control of a series of events. During mobility, microglial migration speed can be regulated by a series of molecular signaling pathways, such as cytokines, chemokines, adhesion molecules, and the extracellular matrix (Milner and Campbell, 2002, 2003; Carbonell et al., 2005; Arnò et al., 2014). Microglia change their shape to adapt to their environment, which relies on the versatility of cytoskeletal proteins, the cross-linked protein system, and the sophisticated system of chemotactic membrane receptors (Franco-Bocanegra et al., 2019). The most studied characteristic of microglia is phagocytosis, which relies on a three-step model: the initial “find-me” step, the subsequent “eat-me” step, and the final “digest-me” step (Sierra et al., 2013). Under physiological conditions, some chemoattractant molecules released by damaged or dead cells serve as “find-me” signals to initiate the chemotactic motility of microglia. Under the coordination of some receptors expressed on the surface of microglia and their ligands, an engulfment synapse is formed, which subsequently internalizes the potentially harmful particles (Ravichandran, 2010). These harmful particles are eventually degraded in phagolysosomes, which are formed by the fusion of phagosomes with lysosomes and other organelles. In addition to their proliferation, migration, and phagocytotic activity, microglia also participate in synaptic plasticity (Paolicelli et al., 2011; Kettenmann et al., 2013; Schafer et al., 2013), developmental sculpting of neural circuits (Schafer et al., 2012; Frost and Schafer, 2016), immune response (Shaked et al., 2004), and vasculature development (Dudvarski Stankovic et al., 2016; Figure 2). Taken together, the functional diversity of microglia plays a critical role in maintaining CNS homeostasis.
Figure 2. Physiological functions of microglia. Scheme illustrating the diverse functions of microglia during development and microenvironmental stimuli. CSF1, colony stimulating factor 1; CSF1R, CSF1 receptor; IRF8, interferon regulatory factor 8.
Microglia and AD
Microglia play important roles in the homeostatic brain, including surveying the entire brain parenchyma, protecting the CNS from pathogenic attacks, and preserving CNS integrity. However, the homeostatic functions of these cells are lost in AD. Accumulating evidence implicates diseased or weakened microglia as important mediators in AD pathology (Table 1, Figure 3).
Table 1. The pathological and protective mechanisms of microglia involvement in AD.
Figure 3. The potential role of microglia in AD. (1) microglia and Aβ. (2) microglia and neuroinflammation. (3) microglia and tau pathology. (4) microglia and mitophagy. AD, Alzheimer’s disease; Aβ, β-amyloid; NFTs, neurofibrillary tangles; SRs, scavenger receptors; TREM2, triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2; SOCS, suppressor of cytokine signaling; JAK, Janus kinase; STAT, signal transducer and activator of transcription; NF-κB, Nuclear Factor-κB; NLRP3, NOD-like receptor family pyrin domain containing 3.
Microglia and Aβ
As a hallmark of AD pathology, Aβ has attracted extensive attention and has been intensively investigated since it was first identified by Alois Alzheimer (Alzheimer et al., 1995). Although converging evidence implicates that microglia are pivotal players in Aβ plaque formation, the underlying mechanisms by which microglia modulate plaque dynamics remain largely unknown. Specifically, whether the failure of Aβ clearance is related to the functional state (activation or senescence) of microglia has been inconsistent across various studies. Traditionally, it was believed that microglia help clear Aβ aggregation via phagocytosis (Pan et al., 2011; Hellwig et al., 2015; Yin et al., 2017). Ablation of microglia in wild-type (WT) organotypic hippocampal slice cultures promotes accumulation of Aβ deposits; however, replenishment with cultured primary microglia can deplete plaque formation by promoting the digestion of Aβ by phagocytosis and its subsequent degradation (Hellwig et al., 2015). Moreover, different Aβ conformations may affect microglial phagocytosis. An in vitro study revealed that it was not the early-stage component of (oligomeric) Aβ but the terminal (fibrillar) Aβ that enhanced the phagocytic activity of microglia (Pan et al., 2011). Oligomeric Aβ1–42 inhibited fibrillar Aβ1–42-elicited microglial phagocytosis, which might be ascribed to increased levels of inflammatory mediators. Anti-inflammatory agents and antioxidants rescued the compromised microglial phagocytosis caused by oligomeric Aβ1–42. With the advance of aging, the phagocytic capacity of microglia is impaired (Safaiyan et al., 2016; Pluvinage et al., 2019). Microglial phagocytosis occurs in early onset AD brains rather than in late-onset AD (LOAD) brains (Yin et al., 2017). Consistent with these findings, microglia-depleted organotypic hippocampal slice cultures replenished with forebrain microglia from adult 5xFAD mice were found to display obvious Aβ plaque formation (Hellwig et al., 2015), suggesting that healthy microglia might play a neuroprotective role compared to dystrophic or senescent microglia. However, the exhaustion of phagocytosis in microglia was probably due to the chronic stimuli of plaque load or high Aβ levels and not just to aging or the genetic background of AD transgenic mice. Indeed, microglia isolated from the cerebellum (an Aβ-free brain area) of juvenile or young adult WT or 5xFAD mice exhibited no differences in the formation of Aβ plaques (Hellwig et al., 2015). Additionally, this explanation makes it easier to understand why microglial ablation had no effect on Aβ plaque load in either young or aged AD transgenic mice (Grathwohl et al., 2009).
In accordance with these findings, we learned that microglia are fully capable of clearing Aβ in a favorable environment. However, the underlying molecular mechanisms of recognition, internalization, and clearance of Aβ by microglia remain unclear. Scavenger receptors (SRs) are defined as cell surface receptors that eliminate degraded or harmful substances (PrabhuDas et al., 2017). SRs are highly expressed on the surface of phagocytes, such as macrophages and microglia, and share the ability to bind many ligands, including Aβ. SRs were first identified in 1979 as macrophage receptors responsible for the uptake of modified low-density lipoprotein (Goldstein et al., 1979). A number of factors have been shown to regulate SR expression. In addition to modified or oxidized low-density lipoproteins, cytokines (Bottalico et al., 1991; Geng and Hansson, 1992; de Villiers et al., 1994; Hsu et al., 1996; Yesner et al., 1996; Khovidhunkit et al., 2001; Murphy et al., 2005; Hashizume and Mihara, 2012), including macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF), tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, IFN-γ, transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1, and IL-1, IL-4, and IL-6, hormones (testosterone and estrogen; Langer et al., 2002; Srivastava, 2003), cell differentiation transcription factors [peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR) α and γ; Chinetti et al., 2000], antioxidants (N-acetylcysteine, kaempferol; Svensson et al., 2002; Li et al., 2013), endotoxin (LPS; Khovidhunkit et al., 2001; Baranova et al., 2002; Park et al., 2012), and bacteria or dead or apoptotic cells (Grolleau et al., 2003), also affect SRs expression.
Currently, the SR family is classified into 10 classes, named SR-A–SR-J (PrabhuDas et al., 2017). In the brains of patients with AD, SRs are prominent in activated microglia surrounding senile plaques (Christie et al., 1996). In an in vitro study, SRs in microglia were found to mediate the binding and internalization of Aβ microaggregates (Paresce et al., 1996). SR-A plays an important role in the adhesion of microglia to Aβ fibrils (El Khoury et al., 1998) and is considered the main receptor for the uptake of fibrillar Aβ (Chung et al., 2001). Based on short-hairpin RNA screening, Frenkel et al. (2013) identified the class A1 scavenger receptors (Scara1) as the primary phagocytic receptors responsible for the clearance of the soluble forms of Aβ. Scara1 deficiency resulted in an approximately 50% reduction in Aβ uptake by the microglia and led to a significant increase in Aβ deposition in amyloid precursor protein (APP)/presenilin 1 (PS1) transgenic mice (Frenkel et al., 2013). In SR-A knockout mice, the ability of microglia to take up fibrillar Aβ was found to be reduced by 60% compared to that in WT mice (Chung et al., 2001). Moreover, fibrillar Aβ uptake in SR-A-knockout mice was competed by other SR ligands. Based on these results, other SRs, including SR-B, may also be involved in the uptake of Aβ by microglia. CD36, the prototype SR-B, has been widely studied in the uptake of Aβ and microglial-induced pro-inflammatory events, which appear to play a dichotomous role in AD progression. CD36 is an important nexus for Aβ recognition by microglia. Microinjection of fibrillar Aβ causes significantly less microglial recruitment when in injected into CD36−/− mice than into CD36+/+ mice (El Khoury et al., 2003), which suggests that microglial recruitment for Aβ deposition is dependent on CD36. Furthermore, TREM2 (triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2)-mediated Aβ phagocytosis also requires CD36 expression (Kim et al., 2017). However, CD36 is involved in the pro-inflammatory events associated with AD. In activated microglia, CD36 mediates the release of neurotoxic reactive oxygen species (ROS), pro-inflammatory cytokines, and chemokines. These pro-inflammatory substances, induced by fibrillar Aβ, were found to be reduced in microglia isolated from CD36-deficient mice (El Khoury et al., 2003). Inhibition of the CD36-Aβ interaction can also block the microglial immune response to Aβ (Doens et al., 2017). Moreover, CD36 is considered an absolute requirement for neurovascular dysfunction and cerebrovascular oxidative stress induced by Aβ (Park et al., 2011). Although studies on CD36 report incongruent results, they contribute to the exploration of new immunomodulatory agents for AD therapeutics. The receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) is also a member of the SR family and belongs to the class J SR group (PrabhuDas et al., 2017). RAGE-immunoreactive microglia have been found to be increased in either Aβ-rich regions of AD brains or in in vitro cell models (Lue et al., 2001). RAGE-Aβ interaction plays an important role in the chemotactic response of microglia to Aβ deposits. RAGE blockade leads to reduced microglial migration toward Aβ deposits (Lue et al., 2001). More recently, numerous studies have reported the pathogenic role of RAGE in AD progression, which promotes the release of pro-inflammatory mediators by activated microglia (Fang et al., 2010; Deane et al., 2012; Cathrine C et al., 2020). A potent multimodal RAGE blocker effectively inhibited the microglial activation and neuroinflammatory response to Aβ and improved the cognitive performance in AD transgenic mice (Deane et al., 2012). Based on an extensive literature review, SR-A appears to be the most important SRs involved in Aβ clearance. Although CD36 and RAGE also play a role in Aβ clearance, these SRs appear to be double-edged swords in controlling the interaction between the microglia and Aβ as they may play a role in both AD progression and prevention. This leads to the thought-provoking question of whether the dysregulation of SRs is causative of AD, or a consequence of its pathological progression. It is well-known that Aβ deposition is a hallmark of AD pathology, which is an early pathological event in AD progression. In the early stages of AD, microglia possess the ability to clear Aβ with the help of SRs. The potential mechanisms for the involvement of SRs in Aβ clearance by the microglia may be the recruitment of microglia to Aβ deposition sites and the mediation of microglial adhesion to Aβ-coated surfaces (El Khoury et al., 1996; Cornejo and von Bernhardi, 2013). Several studies have reported that the increase in Aβ deposition is accompanied by corresponding changes in some SRs, including the activation of SR-A (Zhang et al., 2014), the increased expression of SR-B type I (SR-BI; Thanopoulou et al., 2010; Eugenín et al., 2016), and complicated changes in CD36 levels (Coraci et al., 2002; Ricciarelli et al., 2004). In this sense, the dysregulation of SRs may be a consequence of AD progression. However, whether the dysregulated expression of SRs is a major instigator of AD pathological progression is unclear. Therefore, future studies should elucidate their roles in AD pathology.
With the advent of genome-wide association studies (GWAS), a novel set of AD risk genes associated with microglial function have been identified, including Apolipoprotein E (APOE), Complement receptor 1 (CR1), TREM2, CD33, Membrane-spanning 4-domain subfamily A (MS4A), ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter A7 (ABCA7), and Inositol polyphosphate-5-phosphatase (INPP5D)/Src homology 2-containing inositol-5’-phosphatase 1 (SHIP1; Malik et al., 2015; Efthymiou and Goate, 2017; McQuade and Blurton-Jones, 2019; Nguyen et al., 2020). These genes confer a risk of AD by modulating the activation of microglia, which is determined by the promotion of phagocytosis and the release of inflammatory mediators. Compelling evidence from in vivo and in vitro studies has demonstrated that ApoE plays an important role in regulating the CNS inflammatory and immune response (Lynch et al., 2003; Pocivavsek et al., 2009). However, the molecular mechanisms underlying ApoE-dependent immunomodulation in AD remain unclear. Microglia are thought to play a central role in regulating the interaction between ApoE and amyloid plaque pathology. ApoE deficiency can influence microglial responses to amyloid plaques. The number of microglia located near Aβ plaques was found to be significantly decreased in APOE−/−; APP/ PS1 and APOE−/−; APP/PS1ΔE9 transgenic mice (Ulrich et al., 2018). However, a study of AD human tissues revealed that the APOE ε4 genotype is related to a dampened microglial response to amyloid plaques (Nguyen et al., 2020). A possible explanation for the discrepancies between these studies is that the APOE gene includes three different alleles: ε2, ε3, and ε4. The ε4 allele raises AD risk, whereas the ε2 allele lowers AD risk. Moreover, ApoE is an anti-inflammatory agent (Malik et al., 2015); thus, ApoE deficiency reduces the microglial response to Aβ and amplifies the inflammatory cascade. In addition to APOE, CR1 is also an important genetic susceptibility locus for LOAD. There is growing evidence that some single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of CR1 confer AD risk and are associated with Aβ accumulation (Lambert et al., 2009; Zhu et al., 2015, 2020). The potential role of CR1 in AD pathogenesis may be related to microglia-mediated Aβ phagocytosis. CR1 is presented on microglia, and its expression is increased upon the activation of microglia. Some studies have identified that blocking CR1 leads to a decrease in the capacity of the microglia to phagocytose Aβ (Crehan et al., 2013).
Although TREM2 has been extensively studied as a microglial surface receptor, whether its role in AD pathology is protective, detrimental, or inconsequential is still a subject of debate. GWAS have identified the R47H variant of TREM2 as a risk factor for AD associated with a decrease in amyloid-responsive microglia in the human brain (Ulland et al., 2017; Nguyen et al., 2020). The expression of TREM2 was found to be increased in microglia in plaque-loaded brain regions of AD transgenic mice (Frank et al., 2008), implying that TREM2 is a prominent player in AD progression. Mounting evidence reveals that TREM2 can sustain microglial responses to Aβ deposition and promote microglial phagocytosis (Wang et al., 2015; Ulland et al., 2017; Ruganzu et al., 2021). In TREM2−/−5xFAD mice, microglia failed to cluster around Aβ plaques, resulting in less effective Aβ phagocytosis and clearance (Wang et al., 2015; Ulland et al., 2017), a result that has been replicated in AD patients carrying TREM2 risk variants (Ulland et al., 2017). Why does TREM2 deficiency impair microglial responses to Aβ accumulation? The potential explanation given by Colonna and colleagues was that defective TREM2 function deflects the mammalian target of rapamycin signals, which are responsible for energy and anabolic metabolism; therefore, autophagic flux is considered an effective compensatory response to metabolic defects (Ulland et al., 2017). The increase in autophagic-like vesicles in microglia led to the death of microglia and a decrease in the number of microglia. Thus, microglia are unable to efficiently aggregate around Aβ plaques due to insufficient energy supply and dysfunction. CD33 is thought to act in the opposite direction to TREM2, as it can reduce Aβ phagocytosis and increase the risk of AD (Bradshaw et al., 2013; Griciuc et al., 2013; Yin et al., 2017).
Although ABCA7, MS4A, and INPP5D are poorly characterized, the critical role of these genes in the phagocytosis of Aβ by the microglia has been identified by a few studies. MS4A cluster variants have been reported to modulate the risk of AD in several GWAS (Mao et al., 2015; Chang et al., 2019). MS4A modulates soluble TREM2 production and interacts with APOE, which appears to be an important modulator in AD pathogenesis (Ma et al., 2015; Chang et al., 2019; Deming et al., 2019). ABCA7, a member of the ABC subfamily-A transporters, is strongly expressed in the brain and has been detected in the microglia (Kim et al., 2006). In addition to lipid transport, ABCA7 has been implicated in the microglial Aβ clearance pathway. ABCA7 deficiency aggravates AD pathogenesis by impairing proper microglial responses to Aβ aggregates (Kim W. S. et al., 2013; Fu et al., 2016; Aikawa et al., 2019). INPP5D is also a microglia-related gene, involved in LOAD. Studies have reported that INPP5D expression is upregulated with the progression of AD and is detected mainly in the plaque-associated microglia, implicating a deleterious role of increased INPP5D expression in AD (Tsai et al., 2021). Consequently, targeting these AD-related risk genes may offer new avenues for AD treatment.
As mentioned above, the interplay between microglia and Aβ is intricate. How do microglia access Aβ plaques? What are the molecular mechanisms of recognition, internalization, and clearance of Aβ by microglia? Although a multitude of microglia-associated molecules, including genes and SRs, have been extensively investigated, the precise effects of these molecules remain controversial. On these bases, further experiments are needed to gain clarity; after all, from a therapeutic standpoint, the prospect of targeting microglia-Aβ interactions is encouraging.
Microglia and Neuroinflammation
Inflammation is considered a prominent factor in triggering the onset of AD that may occur even before amyloid deposition (Heneka et al., 2005a), and plays an important role in AD pathology. Interestingly, Aβ deposits, chronic microglial activation, and microglial inflammatory mediators are considered key mechanisms underlying the vicious cycle of inflammation in the course of AD. As mentioned above, some AD risk genes and dysregulated SRs are involved in the release of inflammatory mediators from microglia, exacerbating neuroinflammation in AD. Moderately activated microglia manifest neuroprotective effects in the early stages of AD by phagocytosis of Aβ deposits. However, microglia do not rapidly clear Aβ. Therefore, Aβ aggregates to form extracellular plaques and continue to stimulate microglial activation. Over-activated microglia continuously release inflammatory mediators such as TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β, nitric oxide (NO), and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1; Ishizuka et al., 1997; Akiyama et al., 2000; Fang et al., 2010; Magni et al., 2012), which eventually leads to the enduring chronic neuroinflammatory environment of AD. As an endogenously synthesized free radical, NO appears to play a prominent role in microglia-mediated inflammatory events. NO is synthesized by three distinct nitric oxide synthases: the inducible NO synthase (iNOS), the neuronal NO synthase (nNOS), and the endothelial NO synthase (eNOS; Balez and Ooi, 2016). To our knowledge, eNOS and nNOS may be constitutively expressed in the normal brain; however, the increased expression of iNOS in the CNS is considered pathological (Fernandez et al., 2010). In AD pathogenesis, iNOS is principally produced by reactive microglia and astrocytes during Aβ-elicited inflammatory responses, which then trigger the release of high quantities of NO (Asiimwe et al., 2016). Additionally, iNOS deficiency induced by genetic ablation or pharmacologic inhibition can reduce the cerebral plaque burden and inhibit microgliosis and astrocytosis (Nathan et al., 2005). The contextual link between NO and AD mainly focuses on NO-induced oxidative stress, which amplifies the inflammatory and immune responses in AD pathology via lipid peroxidation and protein S-nitrosylation (Asiimwe et al., 2016). NO interacts with free radical superoxide to form highly reactive nitrogen species, such as peroxynitrite. Peroxynitrite oxidizes a series of molecules, including lipids, proteins, and DNA, which aggravates the oxidative damage to the membrane polyunsaturated fatty acids; damages respiratory enzymes, resulting in a decrease in ATP production; and causes structural and functional DNA impairment. Noxious NO levels also impair the mitochondrial dynamic network through nitrosylating dynamin-related protein 1, leading to mitochondrial fragmentation (Cho et al., 2009; Nakamura and Lipton, 2011).
The role of the NOD-like receptor family pyrin domain-containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome in AD has been subject of thorough investigation. In vivo or in vitro models of AD confirm that microglial inflammasome activation is a potent contributor to AD pathology (Heneka et al., 2013; Gustin et al., 2015). The inflammasome controls caspase-1 activity; in-turn, activated caspase-1 regulates the maturation and secretion of IL-1β. Microglia can express NLRP3 inflammasome-related components, including the NLRP3 protein, apoptotic speck-containing protein with a caspase recruitment domain (ASC), and caspase-1 (Gustin et al., 2015). After priming with LPS, NLRP3 expression is further upregulated in microglia, accompanied by the cleavage and secretion of IL-1β and IL-18, in an NLRP3 inflammasome-dependent manner (Gustin et al., 2015; Freeman et al., 2017). Golenbock and colleagues reported that the amount of caspase-1 in the hippocampus or frontal cortex was substantially increased in patients with AD and MCI compared with controls (Heneka et al., 2013), which implicated chronic inflammasome activation. Increased caspase-1 expression was also found to occur in APP/PS1 transgenic mice. Importantly, NLRP3 or caspase-1 deficiency could protect mice from spatial memory impairment, improve neuronal function, reset microglial phagocytosis, and even reduce Aβ deposition (Heneka et al., 2013). Collectively, Aβ-induced microglial NLRP3 inflammasome activation disrupts Aβ phagocytosis and clearance and amplifies its destructive effects through a vicious cycle of the inflammatory cascade.
Although over-activated microglia are an important contributor to uncontrolled neuroinflammation in AD pathogenesis, during the early stages of the disease, microglia also share the ability to limit and balance inflammatory responses via endogenous anti-inflammatory systems. Suppressors of cytokine signaling (SOCS) proteins are important players in these processes. The SOCS family of proteins is composed of eight protein members with similar structures and properties, named SOCS 1–7 and cytokine-inducible SH2-containing protein (CIS). These proteins act as negative feedback regulators of the Janus kinase (JAK)/signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT), nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB), and toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) pathways (Yoshimura et al., 2005). Evidence from studies on autopsy brain tissues and on cellular and transgenic mouse models has revealed that SOCS proteins, especially SOCS1 and SOCS3, play a role in modulating microglial inflammatory signaling in AD (Cianciulli et al., 2017; Iwahara et al., 2017; Ruganzu et al., 2021). Cianciulli et al. reported that all SOCS mRNA and proteins could be constitutively detected in AD and non-dementia brain samples, and increased expression of some key SOCS genes was observed in vulnerable areas of AD patients (Cianciulli et al., 2017). Consistently, both SOCS1 and SOCS3 mRNA levels were increased in the Aβ-stimulated primary microglia, and obviously increased SOCS3 mRNA was found in AD transgenic mice (Iwahara et al., 2017). However, in contrast to these results, reduced SOCS1 and SOCS3 were found in APP/PS1 mice, accompanied by increased phosphorylation of JAK2, STAT1, and STAT3 (Ruganzu et al., 2021), suggesting that the SOCS signaling pathway is impaired in AD progression.
Taken together, these data suggest that chronic microglial activation plays a detrimental role in the pathogenesis of AD. In addition to the functional status of the microglia, we also need to focus on the timing of neuroinflammation in AD progression. In particular, microglia-associated endogenous anti-inflammatory systems (i.e., SOCS) play a protective role by balancing the inflammatory response during the early stages of the disease. Therefore, it is important to identify the shift in mechanism during the pathological stages of the disease. On this basis, appropriate inhibition of microglial activity or inflammation-targeted therapeutic approaches may uncover effective therapies to attenuate the pathological progression of AD.
Microglia and Tau Pathology
Tauopathies, which are characterized by the pathological aggregation of tau, are considered another key hallmark of AD pathology. Extensive research has shown that microglial dysfunction is also associated with tau pathology and that they may have a bidirectional causal relationship in AD progression. Functionally, microglia have the capacity to phagocytose the pathological aggregation of tau (Luo et al., 2015; Bolos et al., 2016; Brelstaff et al., 2018; Hopp et al., 2018). According to a compelling study, microglia colocalized with NFTs in AD postmortem brains and internalized aggregated tau in vivo and in vitro (Bolos et al., 2016). Microglia can also internalize and degrade hyper-phosphorylated tau isolated from the brain sections of postmortem AD patients or P301S transgenic mice (Luo et al., 2015). Furthermore, the anti-tau monoclonal antibody promoted tau internalization and degradation by the microglia, a process that is dependent on the Fc effector (Luo et al., 2015). Consistently, another study reported that activated microglia engulfed neurons with insoluble tau inclusions in a manner dependent on opsonin milk-fat-globule EGF-factor-8 (MFGE8) and NO production (Brelstaff et al., 2018).
However, aberrant microglial activation also facilitates tau pathology (Bhaskar et al., 2010; Cho et al., 2011; Maphis et al., 2015; Clayton et al., 2021). CX3C chemokine ligand 1 (CX3CL1), also known as fractalkine, is expressed in neurons, and its sole ligand, CX3C chemokine receptor 1 (CX3CR1), is almost exclusively expressed in the microglia (Perea et al., 2018). The CX3CL1/CX3CR1 axis plays an important role in the neuron-microglia crosstalk. Studies suggest that CX3CR1 plays a pivotal role in microglia-mediated tau pathology (Bhaskar et al., 2010; Cho et al., 2011). The levels of both CX3CL1 and CX3CR1 were found to be significantly lower in the hippocampus and frontal cortices of AD brains than in those of controls (Cho et al., 2011), indicating an impairment of CX3CL1/CX3CR1 signaling in AD. Furthermore, increased tau phosphorylation was observed in AD transgenic mice lacking CX3CR1 (Cho et al., 2011). Consistently, altered microglial activation has been observed in tauopathy mice (Bhaskar et al., 2010). Systemic LPS administration to tauopathy mice evidently enhances microtubule-associated protein tau (MAPT) phosphorylation at theSer202 and Thr231 sites (Bhaskar et al., 2010), suggesting that enhanced microglial activation is critical in exacerbating MAPT phosphorylation. Moreover, the loss of Cx3cr1 causes further increase in microglial activation and MAPT phosphorylation in tauopathy mice. Additionally, variants in microglial-expressed genes, including CSF1R (Mancuso et al., 2019a; Clayton et al., 2021), APOE (Shi et al., 2017), and TREM2 (Leyns et al., 2019), are also involved in tau-induced neurodegeneration. Targeting these microglial receptors may pave the way for exploring immunotherapeutic strategies to attenuate tau pathology in AD.
However, there is an incongruent opinion from Bechmann and colleagues (Streit et al., 2009). Given that AD is inextricably associated with aging, it is not surprising that senescent microglia worsen AD pathology. Bechmann et al. revealed that senescent microglia, but not activated microglia, contribute to tau pathology. Baker and colleagues also reported that senescent microglia play a pathogenic role in tau-mediated pathology (Bussian et al., 2018). Senescent microglia have been found in tau MAPT P301S PS19 (PS19) mice. As evidenced by an animal model based on the crossing of INK-ATTAC transgenic mice (ATTAC) and the PS19 strain to generate PS19;ATTAC mice, AP20187 administration results in the elimination of gliosis and glial cell senescence. Moreover, AP20187-treated PS19;ATTAC mice exhibit attenuated tau phosphorylation and improved cognitive function, suggesting that depletion of senescent microglia could protect against tau-dependent pathology.
In addition to the internalization and degradation of hyper-phosphorylated tau proteins, the microglia also participate in tau propagation (Asai et al., 2015; Maphis et al., 2015; Clayton et al., 2021). It is well established that tau proteins share prion-like spreading properties, by active neuron-to-neuron transfer or by contaminating secondary cells through a seeding mechanism (Dujardin and Hyman, 2019). However, the role of microglia in tau dissemination is still a matter of debate. According to an in vivo study, activated microglia spread pathologic tau from CA1 neurons to the subiculum in a time-dependent manner (Maphis et al., 2015). AT180 (a MAPT antibody)-positive neurons were found to be evident in the CA1 region of the hippocampus in 2-month-old hTau (expressing a human tau mutation) Cx3cr1−/− mice, while few AT180 positive neurons were found in the subiculum. By 24 months of age, numerous AT180 positive neurons were found in the subiculum, accompanied by most activated microglia. Another study published at the same time revealed that microglia indeed promote tau transmission (phagocytosis and secretion) through anatomically connected neurons (Asai et al., 2015). Microglial depletion inhibits tau propagation from the entorhinal cortex (EC) to the dentate gyrus (DG). Importantly, extracellular vesicles play a critical role in microglia-mediated tau propagation from neuron to neuron. That study further reported that tau transduction was dependent on exosome secretion, as suppression of exosome synthesis reduces microglia-mediated tau secretion (Asai et al., 2015). Ikezu and colleagues also confirmed that microglia-derived extracellular vesicles containing phosphorylated tau accelerated tau propagation in AD transgenic mice (Clayton et al., 2021).
Microglia and Mitophagy
Mitochondria are known as the sites of ATP production and are involved in the energy metabolic pathways of neurons and glial cells, playing an important role in their survival and diverse functions. Accumulating evidence suggests that AD involves damaged mitochondria (Fang et al., 2019), which leads to bioenergetic deficits, triggers lipid peroxidation, releases large amounts of ROS, and further promotes the accumulation of Aβ and hyper-phosphorylated tau. Accumulation of damaged mitochondria suggestive of impaired mitophagy has been found in AD patients as well as in animal and cellular AD models, which suggests impaired mitophagy. The molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying mitophagy impairment in AD remain unclear. Recent advances in the understanding of compromised mitophagy in AD have revealed the involvement of microglia (Lei et al., 2018; Fang et al., 2019). Microglia are best-known as CNS phagocytes responsible for Aβ clearance. However, dysfunctional microglia are involved in the AD microenvironment, leading to impaired phagocytic function and defective mitophagy in the microglia. Microglial mitophagy is decreased in AD mice compared with WT-mice (Fang et al., 2019). Mitophagy stimulation can enhance the clearance of Aβ plaques by microglia, as well as increase microglial population, improve mitochondrial damage, and decrease neuroinflammation (Fang et al., 2019; Ahmed et al., 2021). The potential explanations for mitophagy stimulation to improve microglial phagocytosis are the restoration of ATP supply and common phagocytic mechanisms between the two; however, which signaling pathways are involved in the mitophagy profiles of microglia is still unknown. Xia and colleagues found that the high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1)/RAGE axis mediates compromised mitophagy flux in microglia (Zhang et al., 2020). In stressed microglia, the expression of HMGB1 and RAGE was upregulated and was accompanied by the accumulation of damaged mitochondria. The HMGB1/RAGE axis plays an important role in blocking late-stage mitophagy in the microglia, which can be reversed by RAGE deficiency. Mitophagy-related downstream events were found to be improved in RAGE−/− microglia, including increased p62 degradation and elevated acidifying lysosomes. Furthermore, facilitation of mitophagy flux inhibited the proinflammatory phenotypic switch of microglia. Inflammasome activation also plays a role in the blockade of mitophagy in the microglia. Following an exposure to the immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1) long terminal repeat region (ssRNA40), the microglia exhibited increased mitochondrial aggregates and blocked autophagy/mitophagy. Defective autophagy/mitophagy abolished the negative regulation of the NLRP3 inflammasome; therefore, NLRP3 activity is increased in HIV-1 ssRNA40-stimulated microglia (Rawat et al., 2019). NLRP3 activation increases the release of proinflammatory cytokines and compromises the functional and structural integrity of mitochondria, causing damage to mitochondrial aggregates in microglia. Taken together, NLRP3 activation and defective mitophagy may interact in a bidirectional manner. From the above discussion, we conclude that targeting mitophagy not only inhibits the neuroinflammation triggered by defective microglia or mitochondria but also enhances the microglial phagocytic activity to maintain the microenvironmental homeostasis.
Targeting Microglia for AD Treatment
Although many efforts are underway to help halt or reverse the underlying pathology of this multifactorial and complex disease, few tangible results have been translated into clinical treatment. Based on the aforementioned discussion, we noted that microglia are important mediators in the development and progression of AD. The functional states of microglia play a particularly important role in health and disease, as dysfunctional microglia lose their phagocytic capacity and subsequently trigger an inflammatory cascade that exacerbates AD pathology. Thus, microglia-targeted therapies may provide a novel therapeutic avenue for treating AD (Table 2).
Table 2. Microglia-targeted therapies in AD.
Microglial Modification Therapeutics
It is well established that microglia play a dual role in AD progression. Early microglial activations exert neuroprotective effects by promoting Aβ clearance and share endogenous anti-inflammatory activity; however, when the Aβ load increases over the course of AD, over-activated microglia acquire a pro-inflammatory phenotype and in turn facilitate Aβ accumulation and accelerate AD pathology. Therefore, eliminating dysfunctional microglia or replenishing healthy microglia may provide novel treatment options for AD.
Several studies have shown that microglia depletion yields tangible results in AD transgenic mouse models (Asai et al., 2015; Sosna et al., 2018; Spangenberg et al., 2019; Casali et al., 2020). CSF1R is indispensable for the survival and development of microglia; thus, continued administration of CSF1R inhibitors is a non-invasive and effective approach to specifically ablate the microglia, which has been adopted in numerous studies. Glabe and colleagues reported that after a 3-month administration of the selective CSF1R inhibitor PLX3397 to 5XFAD mice, the number of microglia was reduced by approximately 70–80% (Sosna et al., 2018). Long-term treatment of 5XFAD transgenic mice with PLX3397 was found to improve cognitive impairment and amyloid pathology in AD-affected brain regions (Sosna et al., 2018). Moreover, in vivo PLX3397-induced microglial depletion was also found to suppress tau propagation (Asai et al., 2015), thereby exerting a neuroprotective effect. Consistently, another CSF1R inhibitor, PLX5622, which has good oral bioavailability and brain-penetration properties, was reported to prevent plaque formation when administered continuously (from 1.5 months of age until 4 or 7 months of age) to 5XFAD mice (Spangenberg et al., 2019). A subsequent study by Landreth and colleagues also found a reduction in overall plaque load by blocking the CSF1R (Casali et al., 2020). However, this study provided a refined understanding of microglial ablation in plaque deposition kinetics during the pathological progression of 5XFAD transgenic mice (4 months old), as it revealed that microglial ablation leads to the alteration of plaque morphology from compact to diffuse. That study demonstrated that microglia play an important role in limiting plaque expansion, even during the peak period of plaque formation. Apart from the pharmacological interventions mentioned above, genetic techniques can also be used to ablate the microglia. Deletion of a Csf1r enhancer, the fms-intronic regulatory element (FIRE), can produce microglia-deficient animal models (Rojo et al., 2019). Cre-mediated recombination led to the specific expression of the diphtheria toxin receptor by microglia under the control of the Cx3cr1 promoter. When treated with the diphtheria toxin, microglia were specifically ablated by approximately 80% (Bruttger et al., 2015). Genetic interventions may provide a more intuitive approach to explore physiological and immunological microglial functions in AD. Although microglial ablation provides a new direction for disease-modifying therapies in AD, many factors need to be discussed and evaluated, such as the functional status of the microglia at specific stages of AD and the precise timing of microglial ablation; thus, major challenges must be addressed before these therapies are clinically available.
Similarly, from a therapeutic standpoint, the replenishment of healthy microglia may also be advantageous in ameliorating AD pathologies. In line with this, transplanted stem cell therapy appears to have the potential to achieve the therapeutic goal of repairing the dysfunctional microglia in the course of AD. Recently, microglia-like cells have been successfully derived from human stem cells, including induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells and embryonic stem (ES) cells (Muffat et al., 2016; Douvaras et al., 2017). Stem cell-derived microglia share a similar signature with purified human fetal microglia and exhibit efficient phagocytosis and a rapid response to detrimental stimuli (Muffat et al., 2016; Douvaras et al., 2017; Haenseler et al., 2017). Furthermore, stem cell-derived microglia can survive and integrate into the mouse brain after transplantation (Mancuso et al., 2019b). Accumulating evidence from in vivo studies has confirmed the neuroprotective effects of transplanted stem cells. The use of stem cell therapies in AD transgenic mice facilitate improvement of memory deficits and related neuropathology (Kim et al., 2012; Kim K.-S. et al., 2013; Kim et al., 2015; Lee et al., 2015).
Targeting Microglial Immunoreceptors
Owing to well-powered GWAS, a series of AD risk genes have been identified, some of which are immunoreceptors expressed in the microglia. Among these various microglial receptors, TREM2 and CD33 have been extensively investigated because they are the top-ranked AD risk genes. As described above, the precise role of TREM2 in AD pathology remains a matter of debate. Increasing evidence suggests that TREM2 is required for microglial response to Aβ, and that TREM2 deficiency aggravates AD pathology, causing decreased Aβ phagocytosis and clearance (Wang et al., 2015; Ulland et al., 2017; Ruganzu et al., 2021). Accordingly, a growing body of studies have aimed to explore the effects of TREM2 agonists on AD pathology. Several TREM2 agonistic antibodies, including antibody 1 (Cheng et al., 2018), antibody 2 (Cheng et al., 2018), AL002c (Wang et al., 2020), and AL002a (Price et al., 2020), have been found to exhibit neuroprotective effects by ameliorating Aβ pathology and increasing microglial responses to Aβ. Notably, the clinical variant of AL002c, AL002, was well tolerated in a human phase 1 clinical trial (Wang et al., 2020). Another recent study revealed a new way to enhance TREM2 activity by reducing proteolytic shedding (Schlepckow et al., 2020). Monoclonal antibody 4D9 reduced the shedding of TREM2 and stabilized its expression on the cell surface via bivalent binding. Importantly, 4D9 enhanced the microglial response to Aβ and increased Aβ phagocytosis in vitro and in vivo (Schlepckow et al., 2020).
It is clear that polymorphisms of the CD33 gene are involved in AD susceptibility and pathology, and the CD33 sialic acid-binding domain may be a potential action site for CD33-mediated suppression of Aβ phagocytosis (Zhao, 2019). Thus, targeting the sialic acid-binding domain may represent a promising approach for the treatment of AD. Parker and colleagues identified a novel sialic acid-based ligand, P22, which is a subtype-selective sialic acid mimetic (Miles et al., 2019). P22 was found to increase Aβ phagocytosis when it was conjugated to microparticles in a CD33-dependent manner. CD33 inhibitory antibodies may provide another means of resistance to the neurotoxic effects of CD33. Based on a database search, CD33 was identified as the strongest candidate for potential anti-AD targets (Zhang et al., 2016). That research article pointed out that several existing CD33 inhibitory antibodies may be repurposed as anti-AD therapies. In particular, lintuzumab, which is currently used for treating acute myelogenous leukemia, may be a viable candidate for treating AD. Further experiments are needed to evaluate and validate the feasibility of using this antibody for the treatment of AD.
Targeting Inflammatory Response in Microglia
The microglia are involved in neuroinflammation through a series of molecular interactions and intercellular communications. Imbalanced microglial activation or insufficient microglial phagocytic capacity can accelerate the accumulation of extracellular Aβ and intracellular NFTs and release large amounts of pro-inflammatory cytokines, chemokines, and ROS. Therefore, normalizing the over-activation of microglia and enhancing their phagocytotic capabilities may mitigate the inflammatory responses in AD. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been extensively explored for the treatment of AD. Chronic NSAID treatment can ameliorate the pathology of AD. Ibuprofen, the most commonly used NSAID, can reduce Aβ plaque load, microglial activation, and proinflammatory cytokine levels in vivo and in vitro (Lim et al., 2000; Yan et al., 2003; Heneka et al., 2005b; Wilkinson et al., 2012). The potential molecular mechanism behind NSAID-mediated neuroprotective effects appears to be associated with PPARγ. Upon activation by NSAIDs, PPARγ exerts transcriptional regulation by repressing the expression of pro-inflammatory genes (Heneka et al., 2005b). Thus, the PPARγ agonist pioglitazone has been translated into clinical AD research (Geldmacher et al., 2011; Sato et al., 2011); however, the associated phase III trials have been terminated due to poor efficacy (Galimberti and Scarpini, 2017; Dong et al., 2019).
Microglial inflammasome activation acts as a potent contributor to AD pathology, with a focus on NLRP3. The NLRP3 inflammasome, a multiprotein complex, contains the NLRP3 protein, adapter protein ASC, and procaspase-1. Studies have reported that direct or indirect inhibition of the NLRP3 inflammasome attenuates the microglial inflammatory responses in AD (Thawkar and Kaur, 2019). The efficacy of several NLRP3 inflammasome-targeting molecular inhibitors, including MCC950 (Dempsey et al., 2017; Lučiūnaitė et al., 2020) and JC-124 (Yin et al., 2018), has been confirmed by preclinical studies. Moreover, the usage of clinical drugs targeting the NLRP3 inflammasome has gained momentum. Minocycline is an anti-inflammatory tetracycline that can cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB). An in vivo study reported that minocycline reduces Aβ accumulation and attenuates microglial activation, possibly because of the inhibition of the NLRP3 inflammasome (Garcez et al., 2019). Clinical trials have also explored the neuroprotective effects of minocycline in AD treatment. However, in a previous study, targeting the inflammatory response by minocycline failed to delay the progression of cognitive impairment in patients with AD (Howard et al., 2020). Edaravone functions as a free radical scavenger and is widely used to treat cerebral infarction. Recent compelling evidence has highlighted the importance of edaravone’s anti-inflammatory effects on Aβ-stimulated microglial activation via inhibition of NLRP3 inflammasome activation (Wang et al., 2017). The neuroprotective role of edaravone has been confirmed by a series of in vivo and in vitro studies (Jiao et al., 2015; Yang et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2017; Parikh et al., 2018). In view of its efficient blood-brain barrier permeability and multiple action targets, edaravone seems to be a promising therapeutic agent.
Purinergic P2X receptor 7 (P2X7R), a member of the purinergic receptor, has promoted in-depth investigation into NLRP3 inflammasome activation. P2X7R is considered a potent activator of the NLRP3 inflammasome; both can be expressed by the microglia, and act synergistically to facilitate the release of pro-inflammatory mediators. Therefore, antagonizing P2X7R may mitigate the microglial inflammatory events in AD (Chiozzi et al., 2019; Thawkar and Kaur, 2019). In the brains of AD patients, P2X7R expression was colocalized with Aβ plaque-associated microglia, and the expression of microglial P2X7R was found to be increased in patients compared with controls (McLarnon et al., 2006). Consistently, these findings were confirmed in in vitro microglia cultures (McLarnon et al., 2006) and in AD transgenic mice (Lee et al., 2011). Furthermore, a specific inhibitor of P2X7R, oxidized ATP, was found to counteract microglial responses induced by co-stimulation with Aβ1–42 and selective P2X7R agonists (McLarnon et al., 2006). In an AD rodent model, another P2X7R inhibitor, brilliant blue G, was found to reduce microgliosis and to antagonize the inflammatory responses elicited by a P2X7R agonist (Ryu and McLarnon, 2008). Nimodipine, a dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonist, has also been shown to confer neuroprotective effects by reducing the levels of activated NF-κB and inhibiting the release of mature IL-1β in Aβ-stimulated microglia (whose potential target is P2X7R), which plays a permissive role in this process (Chiozzi et al., 2019). However, although P2X7R antagonists have sparked interest in the field of cellular and animal research, to date, no AD treatment pharmacotherapies have been incorporated into clinical trials.
As mentioned above, microglia-associated inflammatory events play pathological roles in AD progression, and a series of proteins and pathways are involved in this complex process. To date, many studies have investigated the molecular mechanisms underlying microglial inflammation in the context of AD. However, although these studies have yielded beneficial and effective results in cellular and transgenic animal models of AD, clinical trials targeting microglial inflammatory responses have reported limited success. A potential explanation is that microglia-associated inflammation is a multifactorial and complex process that is tightly interconnected, but the majority of studies tend to target an individual molecule or pathway to explore its potential therapeutic capacity. However, current cellular and transgenic murine models do not mimic the diverse aspects of AD, which explains why promising strategies in cellular and animal models have failed to exhibit efficacy in clinical trials.
Conclusion
Although decades of investments and intense research have been conducted to elucidate the complete mechanism of AD neurodegeneration, there are still no effective therapies in terms of disease attenuation or prevention. The microglia are multifunctional immune cells in the brain that play a vital role in neurological disorders, especially in AD. The prolonged activation of microglia diminishes their phagocytic capabilities, releases a series of pro-inflammatory mediators, and aggravates Aβ and tau pathology in AD progression. The microglia-mediated pathological cascade is a highly complex process involving many proteins and pathways. Based on a thorough overview of the microglial pathology in AD, we learned that the potential therapeutic targets may focus on microglial modification, immunoreceptors, and inflammatory responses. Notably, the functional status of the microglia at specific stages of AD and the precise timing of microglial modifications are important factors that need to be discussed and evaluated. Further studies are also needed to explore the causal link between microglial pathology and AD in a more in-depth manner before the findings in mice can be translated into clinical treatment, as this may present promising avenues for therapeutic AD strategies.
Author Contributions
GZ participated in drafting the manuscript. ZW, HH, and MZ reviewed the literature and revised the manuscript. LS designed and supervised the study. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This study was supported by a grant provided by the Major Chronic Disease Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (No. 2018YFC1312301), the General Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82071442), and the Foundation of Health and Family Planning Commission of Jilin Province (2020J121 and 2015Z043).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.cn) for their English language editing.
References
Ahmed, S., Kwatra, M., Ranjan Panda, S., Murty, U. S. N., and Naidu, V. G. M. (2021). Andrographolide suppresses NLRP3 inflammasome activation in microglia through induction of parkin-mediated mitophagy in in-vitro and in-vivo models of Parkinson disease. Brain Behav. Immun. 91, 142–158. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.09.017
Aikawa, T., Ren, Y., Yamazaki, Y., Tachibana, M., Johnson, M. R., Anderson, C. T., et al. (2019). ABCA7 haplodeficiency disturbs microglial immune responses in the mouse brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 116, 23790–23796. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1908529116
Akiyama, H., Barger, S., Barnum, S., Bradt, B., Bauer, J., Cole, G. M., et al. (2000). Inflammation and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Aging 21, 383–421. doi: 10.1016/s0197-4580(00)00124-x
Alliot, F., Godin, I., and Pessac, B. (1999). Microglia derive from progenitors, originating from the yolk sac, and which proliferate in the brain. Brain Res. Dev. Brain Res. 117, 145–152. doi: 10.1016/s0165-3806(99)00113-3
Alzheimer, A., Stelzmann, R. A., Schnitzlein, H. N., and Murtagh, F. R. (1995). An English translation of Alzheimer’s 1907 paper, “Uber eine eigenartige Erkankung der Hirnrinde”. Clin. Anat. 8, 429–431. doi: 10.1002/ca.980080612
Arnò, B., Grassivaro, F., Rossi, C., Bergamaschi, A., Castiglioni, V., Furlan, R., et al. (2014). Neural progenitor cells orchestrate microglia migration and positioning into the developing cortex. Nat. Commun. 5:5611. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6611
Asai, H., Ikezu, S., Tsunoda, S., Medalla, M., Luebke, J., Haydar, T., et al. (2015). Depletion of microglia and inhibition of exosome synthesis halt tau propagation. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 1584–1593. doi: 10.1038/nn.4132
Asiimwe, N., Yeo, S. G., Kim, M. S., Jung, J., and Jeong, N. Y. (2016). Nitric oxide: exploring the contextual link with Alzheimer’s disease. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2016:7205747. doi: 10.1155/2016/7205747
Askew, K., Li, K., Olmos-Alonso, A., Garcia-Moreno, F., Liang, Y., Richardson, P., et al. (2017). Coupled proliferation and apoptosis maintain the rapid turnover of microglia in the adult brain. Cell Rep. 18, 391–405. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.12.041
Balez, R., and Ooi, L. (2016). Getting to NO Alzheimer’s disease: neuroprotection versus neurotoxicity mediated by nitric oxide. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2016:3806157. doi: 10.1155/2016/3806157
Baranova, I., Vishnyakova, T., Bocharov, A., Chen, Z., Remaley, A. T., Stonik, J., et al. (2002). Lipopolysaccharide down regulates both scavenger receptor B1 and ATP binding cassette transporter A1 in RAW cells. Infect. Immun. 70, 2995–3003. doi: 10.1128/IAI.70.6.2995-3003.2002
Bertrand, J. Y., Jalil, A., Klaine, M., Jung, S., Cumano, A., and Godin, I. (2005). Three pathways to mature macrophages in the early mouse yolk sac. Blood 106, 3004–3011. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-02-0461
Bhaskar, K., Konerth, M., Kokiko-Cochran, O. N., Cardona, A., Ransohoff, R. M., and Lamb, B. T. (2010). Regulation of tau pathology by the microglial fractalkine receptor. Neuron 68, 19–31. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.08.023
Bolos, M., Llorens-Martin, M., Jurado-Arjona, J., Hernandez, F., Rabano, A., and Avila, J. (2016). Direct evidence of internalization of tau by microglia in vitro and in vivo. J. Alzheimers Dis. 50, 77–87. doi: 10.3233/JAD-150704
Bottalico, L. A., Wager, R. E., Agellon, L. B., Assoian, R. K., and Tabas, I. (1991). Transforming growth factor-beta 1 inhibits scavenger receptor activity in THP-1 human macrophages. J. Biol. Chem. 266, 22866–22871. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9258(18)54434-3
Bradshaw, E. M., Chibnik, L. B., Keenan, B. T., Ottoboni, L., Raj, T., Tang, A., et al. (2013). CD33 Alzheimer’s disease locus: altered monocyte function and amyloid biology. Nat. Neurosci. 16, 848–850. doi: 10.1038/nn.3435
Brelstaff, J., Tolkovsky, A. M., Ghetti, B., Goedert, M., and Spillantini, M. G. (2018). Living neurons with tau filaments aberrantly expose phosphatidylserine and are phagocytosed by microglia. Cell Rep. 24, 1939–1948.e4. doi: 10.1038/nn.3435
Bruttger, J., Karram, K., Wortge, S., Regen, T., Marini, F., Hoppmann, N., et al. (2015). Genetic cell ablation reveals clusters of local self-renewing microglia in the mammalian central nervous system. Immunity 43, 92–106. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.06.012
Bussian, T. J., Aziz, A., Meyer, C. F., Swenson, B. L., van Deursen, J. M., and Baker, D. J. (2018). Clearance of senescent glial cells prevents tau-dependent pathology and cognitive decline. Nature 562, 578–582. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0543-y
Carbonell, W. S., Murase, S.-I., Horwitz, A. F., and Mandell, J. W. (2005). Migration of perilesional microglia after focal brain injury and modulation by CC chemokine receptor 5: an in situ time-lapse confocal imaging study. J. Neurosci. 25, 7040–7047. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5171-04.2005
Casali, B. T., MacPherson, K. P., Reed-Geaghan, E. G., and Landreth, G. E. (2020). Microglia depletion rapidly and reversibly alters amyloid pathology by modification of plaque compaction and morphologies. Neurobiol. Dis. 142:104956. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2020.104956
Cathrine C, R., Lukose, B., and Rani, P. (2020). G82S RAGE polymorphism influences amyloid-RAGE interactions relevant in Alzheimer’s disease pathology. PLoS One 15:e0225487. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225487
Chang, Y.-T., Mori, E., Suzuki, M., Ikeda, M., Huang, C.-W., Lee, J.-J., et al. (2019). APOE-MS4A genetic interactions are associated with executive dysfunction and network abnormality in clinically mild Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroimage Clin. 21:101621. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.101621
Cheng, Q., Danao, J., Talreja, S., Wen, P., Yin, J., Sun, N., et al. (2018). TREM2-activating antibodies abrogate the negative pleiotropic effects of the Alzheimer’s disease variant Trem2R47H on murine myeloid cell function. J. Biol. Chem. 293, 12620–12633. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA118.001848
Chinetti, G., Gbaguidi, F. G., Griglio, S., Mallat, Z., Antonucci, M., Poulain, P., et al. (2000). CLA-1/SR-BI is expressed in atherosclerotic lesion macrophages and regulated by activators of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors. Circulation 101, 2411–2417. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.101.20.2411
Chinetti-Gbaguidi, G., Colin, S., and Staels, B. (2015). Macrophage subsets in atherosclerosis. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 12, 10–17. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2014.173
Chiozzi, P., Sarti, A. C., Sanz, J. M., Giuliani, A. L., Adinolfi, E., Vultaggio-Poma, V., et al. (2019). Amyloid beta-dependent mitochondrial toxicity in mouse microglia requires P2X7 receptor expression and is prevented by nimodipine. Sci. Rep. 9:6475. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-42931-2
Cho, D.-H., Nakamura, T., Fang, J., Cieplak, P., Godzik, A., Gu, Z., et al. (2009). S-nitrosylation of Drp1 mediates beta-amyloid-related mitochondrial fission and neuronal injury. Science 324, 102–105. doi: 10.1126/science.1171091
Cho, S.-H., Sun, B., Zhou, Y., Kauppinen, T. M., Halabisky, B., Wes, P., et al. (2011). CX3CR1 protein signaling modulates microglial activation and protects against plaque-independent cognitive deficits in a mouse model of Alzheimer disease. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 32713–32722. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.254268
Christie, R. H., Freeman, M., and Hyman, B. T. (1996). Expression of the macrophage scavenger receptor, a multifunctional lipoprotein receptor, in microglia associated with senile plaques in Alzheimer’s disease. Am. J. Pathol. 148, 399–403.
Chung, H., Brazil, M. I., Irizarry, M. C., Hyman, B. T., and Maxfield, F. R. (2001). Uptake of fibrillar beta-amyloid by microglia isolated from MSR-A (type I and type II) knockout mice. Neuroreport 12, 1151–1154. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200105080-00020
Cianciulli, A., Calvello, R., Porro, C., Trotta, T., and Panaro, M. A. (2017). Understanding the role of SOCS signaling in neurodegenerative diseases: current and emerging concepts. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 37, 67–79. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2017.07.005
Clayton, K., Delpech, J. C., Herron, S., Iwahara, N., Ericsson, M., Saito, T., et al. (2021). Plaque associated microglia hyper-secrete extracellular vesicles and accelerate tau propagation in a humanized APP mouse model. Mol. Neurodegener. 16:18. doi: 10.1186/s13024-021-00440-9
Coraci, I. S., Husemann, J., Berman, J. W., Hulette, C., Dufour, J. H., Campanella, G. K., et al. (2002). CD36, a class B scavenger receptor, is expressed on microglia in Alzheimer’s disease brains and can mediate production of reactive oxygen species in response to beta-amyloid fibrils. Am. J. Pathol. 160, 101–112. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9440(10)64354-4
Cornejo, F., and von Bernhardi, R. (2013). Role of scavenger receptors in glia-mediated neuroinflammatory response associated with Alzheimer’s disease. Mediators Inflamm. 2013:895651. doi: 10.1155/2013/895651
Crehan, H., Hardy, J., and Pocock, J. (2013). Blockage of CR1 prevents activation of rodent microglia. Neurobiol. Dis. 54, 139–149. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2013.02.003
Cuadros, M. A., Martin, C., Coltey, P., Almendros, A., and Navascues, J. (1993). First appearance, distribution and origin of macrophages in the early development of the avian central nervous system. J. Comp. Neurol. 330, 113–129. doi: 10.1002/cne.903300110
Deane, R., Singh, I., Sagare, A. P., Bell, R. D., Ross, N. T., LaRue, B., et al. (2012). A multimodal RAGE-specific inhibitor reduces amyloid beta-mediated brain disorder in a mouse model of Alzheimer disease. J. Clin. Invest. 122, 1377–1392. doi: 10.1172/JCI58642
Deming, Y., Filipello, F., Cignarella, F., Cantoni, C., Hsu, S., Mikesell, R., et al. (2019). The MS4A gene cluster is a key modulator of soluble TREM2 and Alzheimer’s disease risk. Sci. Transl. Med. 11:eaau2291. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aau2291
Dempsey, C., Rubio Araiz, A., Bryson, K. J., Finucane, O., Larkin, C., Mills, E. L., et al. (2017). Inhibiting the NLRP3 inflammasome with MCC950 promotes non-phlogistic clearance of amyloid-beta and cognitive function in APP/PS1 mice. Brain Behav. Immun. 61, 306–316. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2016.12.014
de Villiers, W. J., Fraser, I. P., Hughes, D. A., Doyle, A. G., and Gordon, S. (1994). Macrophage-colony-stimulating factor selectively enhances macrophage scavenger receptor expression and function. J. Exp. Med. 180, 705–709. doi: 10.1084/jem.180.2.705
Doens, D., Valiente, P. A., Mfuh, A. M., Vo, A. X. T., Tristan, A., Carreno, L., et al. (2017). Identification of inhibitors of CD36-amyloid beta binding as potential agents for Alzheimer’s disease. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 8, 1232–1241. doi: 10.1021/acschemneuro.6b00386
Dong, Y., Li, X., Cheng, J., and Hou, L. (2019). Drug development for Alzheimer’s disease: microglia induced neuroinflammation as a target? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20:558. doi: 10.3390/ijms20030558
Douvaras, P., Sun, B., Wang, M., Kruglikov, I., Lallos, G., Zimmer, M., et al. (2017). Directed differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells to microglia. Stem Cell Rep. 8, 1516–1524. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.04.023
Dudvarski Stankovic, N., Teodorczyk, M., Ploen, R., Zipp, F., and Schmidt, M. H. H. (2016). Microglia-blood vessel interactions: a double-edged sword in brain pathologies. Acta Neuropathol. 131, 347–363. doi: 10.1007/s00401-015-1524-y
Dujardin, S., and Hyman, B. T. (2019). Tau prion-like propagation: state of the art and current challenges. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 1184, 305–325. doi: 10.1007/978-981-32-9358-8_23
Efthymiou, A. G., and Goate, A. M. (2017). Late onset alzheimer’s disease genetics implicates microglial pathways in disease risk. Mol. Neurodegener. 12:43. doi: 10.1186/s13024-017-0184-x
El Khoury, J., Hickman, S. E., Thomas, C. A., Cao, L., Silverstein, S. C., and Loike, J. D. (1996). Scavenger receptor-mediated adhesion of microglia to beta-amyloid fibrils. Nature 382, 716–719. doi: 10.1038/382716a0
El Khoury, J., Hickman, S. E., Thomas, C. A., Loike, J. D., and Silverstein, S. C. (1998). Microglia, scavenger receptors, and the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Aging 19, S81–S84. doi: 10.1016/s0197-4580(98)00036-0
El Khoury, J. B., Moore, K. J., Means, T. K., Leung, J., Terada, K., Toft, M., et al. (2003). CD36 mediates the innate host response to beta-amyloid. J. Exp. Med. 197, 1657–1666. doi: 10.1084/jem.20021546
Eugenín, J., Vecchiola, A., Murgas, P., Arroyo, P., Cornejo, F., and von Bernhardi, R. (2016). Expression pattern of scavenger receptors and amyloid-beta phagocytosis of astrocytes and microglia in culture are modified by acidosis: implications for Alzheimer’s disease. J. Alzheimers Dis. 53, 857–873. doi: 10.3233/JAD-160083
Fang, E. F., Hou, Y., Palikaras, K., Adriaanse, B. A., Kerr, J. S., Yang, B., et al. (2019). Mitophagy inhibits amyloid-beta and tau pathology and reverses cognitive deficits in models of Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Neurosci. 22, 401–412. doi: 10.1038/s41593-018-0332-9
Fang, F., Lue, L.-F., Yan, S., Xu, H., Luddy, J. S., Chen, D., et al. (2010). RAGE-dependent signaling in microglia contributes to neuroinflammation, Abeta accumulation and impaired learning/memory in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. FASEB J. 24, 1043–1055. doi: 10.1096/fj.09-139634
Fernandez, A. P., Pozo-Rodrigalvarez, A., Serrano, J., and Martinez-Murillo, R. (2010). Nitric oxide: target for therapeutic strategies in Alzheimer’s disease. Curr. Pharm. Des. 16, 2837–2850. doi: 10.2174/138161210793176590
Franco-Bocanegra, D. K., McAuley, C., Nicoll, J. A. R., and Boche, D. (2019). Molecular mechanisms of microglial motility: changes in ageing and Alzheimer’s disease. Cells 8:639. doi: 10.3390/cells8060639
Frank, S., Burbach, G. J., Bonin, M., Walter, M., Streit, W., Bechmann, I., et al. (2008). TREM2 is upregulated in amyloid plaque-associated microglia in aged APP23 transgenic mice. Glia 56, 1438–1447. doi: 10.1002/glia.20710
Freeman, L., Guo, H., David, C. N., Brickey, W. J., Jha, S., and Ting, J. P. (2017). NLR members NLRC4 and NLRP3 mediate sterile inflammasome activation in microglia and astrocytes. J. Exp. Med. 214, 1351–1370. doi: 10.1084/jem.20150237
Frenkel, D., Wilkinson, K., Zhao, L., Hickman, S. E., Means, T. K., Puckett, L., et al. (2013). Scara1 deficiency impairs clearance of soluble amyloid-beta by mononuclear phagocytes and accelerates Alzheimer’s-like disease progression. Nat. Commun. 4:2030. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3030
Frost, J. L., and Schafer, D. P. (2016). Microglia: architects of the developing nervous system. Trends Cell Biol. 26, 587–597. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2016.02.006
Fu, Y., Hsiao, J.-H., Paxinos, G., Halliday, G. M., and Kim, W. S. (2016). ABCA7 mediates phagocytic clearance of amyloid-beta in the brain. J. Alzheimers Dis. 54, 569–584. doi: 10.3233/JAD-160456
Galimberti, D., and Scarpini, E. (2017). Pioglitazone for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 26, 97–101. doi: 10.1080/13543784.2017.1265504
Garcez, M. L., Mina, F., Bellettini-Santos, T., da Luz, A. P., Schiavo, G. L., Macieski, J. M. C., et al. (2019). The involvement of NLRP3 on the effects of minocycline in an AD-like pathology induced by beta-amyloid oligomers administered to mice. Mol. Neurobiol. 56, 2606–2617. doi: 10.1007/s12035-018-1211-9
Geldmacher, D. S., Fritsch, T., McClendon, M. J., and Landreth, G. (2011). A randomized pilot clinical trial of the safety of pioglitazone in treatment of patients with Alzheimer disease. Arch. Neurol. 68, 45–50. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2010.229
Geng, Y. J., and Hansson, G. K. (1992). Interferon-gamma inhibits scavenger receptor expression and foam cell formation in human monocyte-derived macrophages. J. Clin. Invest. 89, 1322–1330. doi: 10.1172/JCI115718
Ginhoux, F., Greter, M., Leboeuf, M., Nandi, S., See, P., Gokhan, S., et al. (2010). Fate mapping analysis reveals that adult microglia derive from primitive macrophages. Science 330, 841–845. doi: 10.1126/science.1194637
Goldstein, J. L., Ho, Y. K., Basu, S. K., and Brown, M. S. (1979). Binding site on macrophages that mediates uptake and degradation of acetylated low density lipoprotein, producing massive cholesterol deposition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 76, 333–337. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.1.333
Gomez Perdiguero, E., Klapproth, K., Schulz, C., Busch, K., Azzoni, E., Crozet, L., et al. (2015). Tissue-resident macrophages originate from yolk-sac-derived erythro-myeloid progenitors. Nature 518, 547–551. doi: 10.1038/nature13989
Gómez-Nicola, D., Fransen, N. L., Suzzi, S., and Perry, V. H. (2013). Regulation of microglial proliferation during chronic neurodegeneration. J. Neurosci. 33, 2481–2493. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4440-12.2013
Grathwohl, S. A., Kälin, R. E., Bolmont, T., Prokop, S., Winkelmann, G., Kaeser, S. A., et al. (2009). Formation and maintenance of Alzheimer’s disease beta-amyloid plaques in the absence of microglia. Nat. Neurosci. 12, 1361–1363. doi: 10.1038/nn.2432
Griciuc, A., Serrano-Pozo, A., Parrado, A. R., Lesinski, A. N., Asselin, C. N., Mullin, K., et al. (2013). Alzheimer’s disease risk gene CD33 inhibits microglial uptake of amyloid beta. Neuron 78, 631–643. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.04.014
Grolleau, A., Misek, D. E., Kuick, R., Hanash, S., and Mule, J. J. (2003). Inducible expression of macrophage receptor Marco by dendritic cells following phagocytic uptake of dead cells uncovered by oligonucleotide arrays. J. Immunol. 171, 2879–2888. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.171.6.2879
Gustin, A., Kirchmeyer, M., Koncina, E., Felten, P., Losciuto, S., Heurtaux, T., et al. (2015). NLRP3 inflammasome is expressed and functional in mouse brain microglia but not in astrocytes. PLoS One 10:e0130624. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130624
Haenseler, W., Sansom, S. N., Buchrieser, J., Newey, S. E., Moore, C. S., Nicholls, F. J., et al. (2017). A highly efficient human pluripotent stem cell microglia model displays a neuronal-co-culture-specific expression profile and inflammatory response. Stem Cell Rep. 8, 1727–1742. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.05.017
Hashizume, M., and Mihara, M. (2012). Atherogenic effects of TNF-alpha and IL-6 via up-regulation of scavenger receptors. Cytokine 58, 424–430. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2012.02.010
Hellwig, S., Masuch, A., Nestel, S., Katzmarski, N., Meyer-Luehmann, M., and Biber, K. (2015). Forebrain microglia from wild-type but not adult 5xFAD mice prevent amyloid-beta plaque formation in organotypic hippocampal slice cultures. Sci. Rep. 5:14624. doi: 10.1038/srep14624
Heneka, M. T., Kummer, M. P., Stutz, A., Delekate, A., Schwartz, S., Vieira-Saecker, A., et al. (2013). NLRP3 is activated in Alzheimer’s disease and contributes to pathology in APP/PS1 mice. Nature 493, 674–678. doi: 10.1038/nature11729
Heneka, M. T., Sastre, M., Dumitrescu-Ozimek, L., Dewachter, I., Walter, J., Klockgether, T., et al. (2005a). Focal glial activation coincides with increased BACE1 activation and precedes amyloid plaque deposition in APP[V717I] transgenic mice. J. Neuroinflammation 2:22. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-2-22
Heneka, M. T., Sastre, M., Dumitrescu-Ozimek, L., Hanke, A., Dewachter, I., Kuiperi, C., et al. (2005b). Acute treatment with the PPARgamma agonist pioglitazone and ibuprofen reduces glial inflammation and Abeta1–42 levels in APPV717I transgenic mice. Brain 128, 1442–1453. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh452
Hopp, S. C., Lin, Y., Oakley, D., Roe, A. D., DeVos, S. L., Hanlon, D., et al. (2018). The role of microglia in processing and spreading of bioactive tau seeds in Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neuroinflammation 15:269. doi: 10.1186/s12974-018-1309-z
Howard, R., Zubko, O., Bradley, R., Harper, E., Pank, L., O’Brien, J., et al. (2020). Minocycline at 2 different dosages vs. placebo for patients with mild Alzheimer disease: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. 77, 164–174. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.3762
Hsu, H. Y., Nicholson, A. C., and Hajjar, D. P. (1996). Inhibition of macrophage scavenger receptor activity by tumor necrosis factor-alpha is transcriptionally and post-transcriptionally regulated. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 7767–7773. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.13.7767
Ishizuka, K., Kimura, T., Igata-yi, R., Katsuragi, S., Takamatsu, J., and Miyakawa, T. (1997). Identification of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 in senile plaques and reactive microglia of Alzheimer’s disease. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 51, 135–138. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1819.1997.tb02375.x
Iwahara, N., Hisahara, S., Kawamata, J., Matsumura, A., Yokokawa, K., Saito, T., et al. (2017). Role of suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 (SOCS3) in altering activated microglia phenotype in APPswe/PS1dE9 mice. J. Alzheimers Dis. 55, 1235–1247. doi: 10.3233/JAD-160887
Jiao, S.-S., Yao, X.-Q., Liu, Y.-H., Wang, Q.-H., Zeng, F., Lu, J.-J., et al. (2015). Edaravone alleviates Alzheimer’s disease-type pathologies and cognitive deficits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 112, 5225–5230. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1422998112
Kettenmann, H., Kirchhoff, F., and Verkhratsky, A. (2013). Microglia: new roles for the synaptic stripper. Neuron 77, 10–18. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.12.023
Khovidhunkit, W., Moser, A. H., Shigenaga, J. K., Grunfeld, C., and Feingold, K. R. (2001). Regulation of scavenger receptor class B type I in hamster liver and Hep3B cells by endotoxin and cytokines. J. Lipid Res. 42, 1636–1644. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2275(20)32218-5
Kim, S., Chang, K.-A., Kim, J., Park, H.-G., Ra, J. C., Kim, H.-S., et al. (2012). The preventive and therapeutic effects of intravenous human adipose-derived stem cells in Alzheimer’s disease mice. PLoS One 7:e45757. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045757
Kim, W. S., Guillemin, G. J., Glaros, E. N., Lim, C. K., and Garner, B. (2006). Quantitation of ATP-binding cassette subfamily-A transporter gene expression in primary human brain cells. Neuroreport 17, 891–896. doi: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000221833.41340.cd
Kim, J. A., Ha, S., Shin, K. Y., Kim, S., Lee, K. J., Chong, Y. H., et al. (2015). Neural stem cell transplantation at critical period improves learning and memory through restoring synaptic impairment in Alzheimer’s disease mouse model. Cell Death Dis. 6:e1789. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2015.138
Kim, K.-S., Kim, H. S., Park, J.-M., Kim, H. W., Park, M.-K., Lee, H.-S., et al. (2013). Long-term immunomodulatory effect of amniotic stem cells in an Alzheimer’s disease model. Neurobiol. Aging 34, 2408–2420. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.03.029
Kim, W. S., Li, H., Ruberu, K., Chan, S., Elliott, D. A., Low, J. K., et al. (2013). Deletion of Abca7 increases cerebral amyloid-beta accumulation in the J20 mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neurosci. 33, 4387–4394. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4165-12.2013
Kim, S.-M., Mun, B.-R., Lee, S.-J., Joh, Y., Lee, H.-Y., Ji, K.-Y., et al. (2017). TREM2 promotes Abeta phagocytosis by upregulating C/EBPalpha-dependent CD36 expression in microglia. Sci. Rep. 7:11118. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-11634-x
Lambert, J.-C., Heath, S., Even, G., Campion, D., Sleegers, K., Hiltunen, M., et al. (2009). Genome-wide association study identifies variants at CLU and CR1 associated with Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Genet. 41, 1094–1099. doi: 10.1038/ng.439
Langer, C., Gansz, B., Goepfert, C., Engel, T., Uehara, Y., von Dehn, G., et al. (2002). Testosterone up-regulates scavenger receptor BI and stimulates cholesterol efflux from macrophages. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 296, 1051–1057. doi: 10.1016/s0006-291x(02)02038-7
Lawson, L. J., Perry, V. H., and Gordon, S. (1992). Turnover of resident microglia in the normal adult mouse brain. Neuroscience 48, 405–415. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(92)90500-2
Lee, I.-S., Jung, K., Kim, I.-S., Lee, H., Kim, M., Yun, S., et al. (2015). Human neural stem cells alleviate Alzheimer-like pathology in a mouse model. Mol. Neurodegener. 10:38. doi: 10.1186/s13024-015-0035-6
Lee, H. G., Won, S. M., Gwag, B. J., and Lee, Y. B. (2011). Microglial P2X(7) receptor expression is accompanied by neuronal damage in the cerebral cortex of the APPswe/PS1dE9 mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Exp. Mol. Med. 43, 7–14. doi: 10.3858/emm.2011.43.1.001
Lei, Q., Tan, J., Yi, S., Wu, N., Wang, Y., and Wu, H. (2018). Mitochonic acid 5 activates the MAPK-ERK-yap signaling pathways to protect mouse microglial BV-2 cells against TNFalpha-induced apoptosis via increased Bnip3-related mitophagy. Cell. Mol. Biol. Lett. 23:14. doi: 10.1186/s11658-018-0081-5
Leyns, C. E. G., Gratuze, M., Narasimhan, S., Jain, N., Koscal, L. J., Jiang, H., et al. (2019). TREM2 function impedes tau seeding in neuritic plaques. Nat. Neurosci. 22, 1217–1222. doi: 10.1038/s41593-019-0433-0
Li, X.-Y., Kong, L.-X., Li, J., He, H.-X., and Zhou, Y.-D. (2013). Kaempferol suppresses lipid accumulation in macrophages through the downregulation of cluster of differentiation 36 and the upregulation of scavenger receptor class B type I and ATP-binding cassette transporters A1 and G1. Int. J. Mol. Med. 31, 331–338. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2012.1204
Lim, G. P., Yang, F., Chu, T., Chen, P., Beech, W., Teter, B., et al. (2000). Ibuprofen suppresses plaque pathology and inflammation in a mouse model for Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neurosci. 20, 5709–5714. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-15-05709.2000
Long, J. M., and Holtzman, D. M. (2019). Alzheimer disease: an update on pathobiology and treatment strategies. Cell 179, 312–339. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.09.001
Lučiūnaitė, A., McManus, R. M., Jankunec, M., Rácz, I., Dansokho, C., Dalgėdienė, I., et al. (2020). Soluble Abeta oligomers and protofibrils induce NLRP3 inflammasome activation in microglia. J. Neurochem. 155, 650–661. doi: 10.1111/jnc.14945
Lue, L. F., Walker, D. G., Brachova, L., Beach, T. G., Rogers, J., Schmidt, A. M., et al. (2001). Involvement of microglial receptor for advanced glycation endproducts (RAGE) in Alzheimer’s disease: identification of a cellular activation mechanism. Exp. Neurol. 171, 29–45. doi: 10.1006/exnr.2001.7732
Luo, W., Liu, W., Hu, X., Hanna, M., Caravaca, A., and Paul, S. M. (2015). Microglial internalization and degradation of pathological tau is enhanced by an anti-tau monoclonal antibody. Sci. Rep. 5:11161. doi: 10.1038/srep11161
Lux, C. T., Yoshimoto, M., McGrath, K., Conway, S. J., Palis, J., and Yoder, M. C. (2008). All primitive and definitive hematopoietic progenitor cells emerging before E10 in the mouse embryo are products of the yolk sac. Blood 111, 3435–3438. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-08-107086
Lynch, J. R., Tang, W., Wang, H., Vitek, M. P., Bennett, E. R., Sullivan, P. M., et al. (2003). APOE genotype and an ApoE-mimetic peptide modify the systemic and central nervous system inflammatory response. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 48529–48533. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M306923200
Ma, J., Yu, J.-T., and Tan, L. (2015). MS4A cluster in Alzheimer’s disease. Mol. Neurobiol. 51, 1240–1248. doi: 10.1007/s12035-014-8800-z
Magni, P., Ruscica, M., Dozio, E., Rizzi, E., Beretta, G., and Maffei Facino, R. (2012). Parthenolide inhibits the LPS-induced secretion of IL-6 and TNF-alpha and NF-kappaB nuclear translocation in BV-2 microglia. Phytother. Res. 26, 1405–1409. doi: 10.1002/ptr.3732
Malik, M., Parikh, I., Vasquez, J. B., Smith, C., Tai, L., Bu, G., et al. (2015). Genetics ignite focus on microglial inflammation in Alzheimer’s disease. Mol. Neurodegener. 10:52. doi: 10.1186/s13024-015-0048-1
Mancuso, R., Fryatt, G., Cleal, M., Obst, J., Pipi, E., Monzon-Sandoval, J., et al. (2019a). CSF1R inhibitor JNJ-40346527 attenuates microglial proliferation and neurodegeneration in P301S mice. Brain 142, 3243–3264. doi: 10.1093/brain/awz241
Mancuso, R., Van Den Daele, J., Fattorelli, N., Wolfs, L., Balusu, S., Burton, O., et al. (2019b). Stem-cell-derived human microglia transplanted in mouse brain to study human disease. Nat. Neurosci. 22, 2111–2116. doi: 10.1038/s41593-019-0525-x
Mao, Y.-F., Guo, Z.-Y., Pu, J.-L., Chen, Y.-X., and Zhang, B.-R. (2015). Association of CD33 and MS4A cluster variants with Alzheimer’s disease in East Asian populations. Neurosci. Lett. 609, 235–239. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2015.10.007
Maphis, N., Xu, G., Kokiko-Cochran, O. N., Jiang, S., Cardona, A., Ransohoff, R. M., et al. (2015). Reactive microglia drive tau pathology and contribute to the spreading of pathological tau in the brain. Brain 138, 1738–1755. doi: 10.1093/brain/awv081
Martinez, F. O., Sica, A., Mantovani, A., and Locati, M. (2008). Macrophage activation and polarization. Front. Biosci. 13, 453–461. doi: 10.2741/2692
McLarnon, J. G., Ryu, J. K., Walker, D. G., and Choi, H. B. (2006). Upregulated expression of purinergic P2X(7) receptor in Alzheimer disease and amyloid-beta peptide-treated microglia and in peptide-injected rat hippocampus. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 65, 1090–1097. doi: 10.1097/01.jnen.0000240470.97295.d3
McQuade, A., and Blurton-Jones, M. (2019). Microglia in Alzheimer’s disease: exploring how genetics and phenotype influence risk. J. Mol. Biol. 431, 1805–1817. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2019.01.045
Miles, L. A., Hermans, S. J., Crespi, G. A. N., Gooi, J. H., Doughty, L., Nero, T. L., et al. (2019). Small molecule binding to Alzheimer risk factor CD33 promotes abeta phagocytosis. iScience 19, 110–118. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2019.07.023
Milner, R., and Campbell, I. L. (2002). The integrin family of cell adhesion molecules has multiple functions within the CNS. J. Neurosci. Res. 69, 286–291. doi: 10.1002/jnr.10321
Milner, R., and Campbell, I. L. (2003). The extracellular matrix and cytokines regulate microglial integrin expression and activation. J. Immunol. 170, 3850–3858. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.170.7.3850
Minten, C., Terry, R., Deffrasnes, C., King, N. J., and Campbell, I. L. (2012). IFN regulatory factor 8 is a key constitutive determinant of the morphological and molecular properties of microglia in the CNS. PLoS One 7:e49851. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049851
Mizuno, T., Doi, Y., Mizoguchi, H., Jin, S., Noda, M., Sonobe, Y., et al. (2011). Interleukin-34 selectively enhances the neuroprotective effects of microglia to attenuate oligomeric amyloid-beta neurotoxicity. Am. J. Pathol. 179, 2016–2027. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.06.011
Muffat, J., Li, Y., Yuan, B., Mitalipova, M., Omer, A., Corcoran, S., et al. (2016). Efficient derivation of microglia-like cells from human pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Med. 22, 1358–1367. doi: 10.1038/nm.4189
Murphy, J. E., Tedbury, P. R., Homer-Vanniasinkam, S., Walker, J. H., and Ponnambalam, S. (2005). Biochemistry and cell biology of mammalian scavenger receptors. Atherosclerosis 182, 1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2005.03.036
Nakai, K. (2021). Multiple roles of macrophage in skin. J. Dermatol. Sci. [Online ahead of print]. doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2021.08.008
Nakamura, T., and Lipton, S. A. (2011). S-nitrosylation of critical protein thiols mediates protein misfolding and mitochondrial dysfunction in neurodegenerative diseases. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 14, 1479–1492. doi: 10.1089/ars.2010.3570
Nathan, C., Calingasan, N., Nezezon, J., Ding, A., Lucia, M. S., La Perle, K., et al. (2005). Protection from Alzheimer’s-like disease in the mouse by genetic ablation of inducible nitric oxide synthase. J. Exp. Med. 202, 1163–1169. doi: 10.1084/jem.20051529
Nguyen, A. T., Wang, K., Hu, G., Wang, X., Miao, Z., Azevedo, J. A., et al. (2020). APOE and TREM2 regulate amyloid-responsive microglia in Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol. 140, 477–493. doi: 10.1007/s00401-020-02200-3
Palis, J., Robertson, S., Kennedy, M., Wall, C., and Keller, G. (1999). Development of erythroid and myeloid progenitors in the yolk sac and embryo proper of the mouse. Development 126, 5073–5084. doi: 10.1242/dev.126.22.5073
Pan, X.-D., Zhu, Y.-G., Lin, N., Zhang, J., Ye, Q.-Y., Huang, H.-P., et al. (2011). Microglial phagocytosis induced by fibrillar beta-amyloid is attenuated by oligomeric beta-amyloid: implications for Alzheimer’s disease. Mol. Neurodegener. 6:45. doi: 10.1186/1750-1326-6-45
Paolicelli, R. C., Bolasco, G., Pagani, F., Maggi, L., Scianni, M., Panzanelli, P., et al. (2011). Synaptic pruning by microglia is necessary for normal brain development. Science 333, 1456–1458. doi: 10.1126/science.1202529
Paresce, D. M., Ghosh, R. N., and Maxfield, F. R. (1996). Microglial cells internalize aggregates of the Alzheimer’s disease amyloid beta-protein via a scavenger receptor. Neuron 17, 553–565. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80187-7
Parikh, A., Kathawala, K., Li, J., Chen, C., Shan, Z., Cao, X., et al. (2018). Self-nanomicellizing solid dispersion of edaravone: part II: in vivo assessment of efficacy against behavior deficits and safety in Alzheimer’s disease model. Drug Des. Devel. Ther. 12, 2111–2128. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S161944
Park, Y., Pham, T. X., and Lee, J. (2012). Lipopolysaccharide represses the expression of ATP-binding cassette transporter G1 and scavenger receptor class B, type I in murine macrophages. Inflamm. Res. 61, 465–472. doi: 10.1007/s00011-011-0433-3
Park, L., Wang, G., Zhou, P., Zhou, J., Pitstick, R., Previti, M. L., et al. (2011). Scavenger receptor CD36 is essential for the cerebrovascular oxidative stress and neurovascular dysfunction induced by amyloid-beta. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 108, 5063–5068. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1015413108
Perea, J. R., Llorens-Martin, M., Avila, J., and Bolos, M. (2018). The role of microglia in the spread of tau: relevance for tauopathies. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 12:172. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2018.00172
Pluvinage, J. V., Haney, M. S., Smith, B. A. H., Sun, J., Iram, T., Bonanno, L., et al. (2019). CD22 blockade restores homeostatic microglial phagocytosis in ageing brains. Nature 568, 187–192. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1088-4
Pocivavsek, A., Burns, M. P., and Rebeck, G. W. (2009). Low-density lipoprotein receptors regulate microglial inflammation through c-Jun N-terminal kinase. Glia 57, 444–453. doi: 10.1002/glia.20772
PrabhuDas, M. R., Baldwin, C. L., Bollyky, P. L., Bowdish, D. M. E., Drickamer, K., Febbraio, M., et al. (2017). A consensus definitive classification of scavenger receptors and their roles in health and disease. J. Immunol. 198, 3775–3789. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1700373
Price, B. R., Sudduth, T. L., Weekman, E. M., Johnson, S., Hawthorne, D., Woolums, A., et al. (2020). Therapeutic Trem2 activation ameliorates amyloid-beta deposition and improves cognition in the 5XFAD model of amyloid deposition. J. Neuroinflammation 17:238. doi: 10.1186/s12974-020-01915-0
Ransohoff, R. M. (2016). A polarizing question: do M1 and M2 microglia exist? Nat. Neurosci. 19, 987–991. doi: 10.1038/nn.4338
Ravichandran, K. S. (2010). Find-me and eat-me signals in apoptotic cell clearance: progress and conundrums. J. Exp. Med. 207, 1807–1817. doi: 10.1084/jem.20101157
Rawat, P., Teodorof-Diedrich, C., and Spector, S. A. (2019). Human immunodeficiency virus Type-1 single-stranded RNA activates the NLRP3 inflammasome and impairs autophagic clearance of damaged mitochondria in human microglia. Glia 67, 802–824. doi: 10.1002/glia.23568
Ricciarelli, R., D’Abramo, C., Zingg, J. M., Giliberto, L., Markesbery, W., Azzi, A., et al. (2004). CD36 overexpression in human brain correlates with beta-amyloid deposition but not with Alzheimer’s disease. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 36, 1018–1024. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2004.01.007
Rojo, R., Raper, A., Ozdemir, D. D., Lefevre, L., Grabert, K., Wollscheid-Lengeling, E., et al. (2019). Deletion of a Csf1r enhancer selectively impacts CSF1R expression and development of tissue macrophage populations. Nat. Commun. 10:3215. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11053-8
Ruganzu, J. B., Zheng, Q., Wu, X., He, Y., Peng, X., Jin, H., et al. (2021). TREM2 overexpression rescues cognitive deficits in APP/PS1 transgenic mice by reducing neuroinflammation via the JAK/STAT/SOCS signaling pathway. Exp. Neurol. 336:113506. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2020.113506
Ryu, J. K., and McLarnon, J. G. (2008). Block of purinergic P2X(7) receptor is neuroprotective in an animal model of Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroreport 19, 1715–1719. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3283179333
Safaiyan, S., Kannaiyan, N., Snaidero, N., Brioschi, S., Biber, K., Yona, S., et al. (2016). Age-related myelin degradation burdens the clearance function of microglia during aging. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 995–998. doi: 10.1038/nn.4325
Sato, T., Hanyu, H., Hirao, K., Kanetaka, H., Sakurai, H., and Iwamoto, T. (2011). Efficacy of PPAR-gamma agonist pioglitazone in mild Alzheimer disease. Neurobiol. Aging 32, 1626–1633. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2009.10.009
Schafer, D. P., Lehrman, E. K., Kautzman, A. G., Koyama, R., Mardinly, A. R., Yamasaki, R., et al. (2012). Microglia sculpt postnatal neural circuits in an activity and complement-dependent manner. Neuron 74, 691–705. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.03.026
Schafer, D. P., Lehrman, E. K., and Stevens, B. (2013). The “quad-partite” synapse: microglia-synapse interactions in the developing and mature CNS. Glia 61, 24–36. doi: 10.1002/glia.22389
Schlepckow, K., Monroe, K. M., Kleinberger, G., Cantuti-Castelvetri, L., Parhizkar, S., Xia, D., et al. (2020). Enhancing protective microglial activities with a dual function TREM2 antibody to the stalk region. EMBO Mol. Med. 12:e11227. doi: 10.15252/emmm.201911227
Schulz, C., Gomez Perdiguero, E., Chorro, L., Szabo-Rogers, H., Cagnard, N., Kierdorf, K., et al. (2012). A lineage of myeloid cells independent of Myb and hematopoietic stem cells. Science 336, 86–90. doi: 10.1126/science.1219179
Shaked, I., Porat, Z., Gersner, R., Kipnis, J., and Schwartz, M. (2004). Early activation of microglia as antigen-presenting cells correlates with T cell-mediated protection and repair of the injured central nervous system. J. Neuroimmunol. 146, 84–93. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2003.10.049
Shi, Y., Yamada, K., Liddelow, S. A., Smith, S. T., Zhao, L., Luo, W., et al. (2017). ApoE4 markedly exacerbates tau-mediated neurodegeneration in a mouse model of tauopathy. Nature 549, 523–527. doi: 10.1038/nature24016
Sierra, A., Abiega, O., Shahraz, A., and Neumann, H. (2013). Janus-faced microglia: beneficial and detrimental consequences of microglial phagocytosis. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 7:6. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2013.00006
Sierra, A., de Castro, F., Del Rio-Hortega, J., Rafael Iglesias-Rozas, J., Garrosa, M., and Kettenmann, H. (2016). The “Big-Bang” for modern glial biology: translation and comments on Pío del Río-Hortega 1919 series of papers on microglia. Glia 64, 1801–1840. doi: 10.1002/glia.23046
Smolders, S. M.-T., Kessels, S., Vangansewinkel, T., Rigo, J. M., Legendre, P., and Brone, B. (2019). Microglia: brain cells on the move. Prog. Neurobiol. 178:101612. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2019.04.001
Sosna, J., Philipp, S., Albay, R. III., Reyes-Ruiz, J. M., Baglietto-Vargas, D., LaFerla, F. M., et al. (2018). Early long-term administration of the CSF1R inhibitor PLX3397 ablates microglia and reduces accumulation of intraneuronal amyloid, neuritic plaque deposition and pre-fibrillar oligomers in 5XFAD mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Mol. Neurodegener. 13:11. doi: 10.1186/s13024-018-0244-x
Spangenberg, E., Severson, P. L., Hohsfield, L. A., Crapser, J., Zhang, J., Burton, E. A., et al. (2019). Sustained microglial depletion with CSF1R inhibitor impairs parenchymal plaque development in an Alzheimer’s disease model. Nat. Commun. 10:3758. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11674-z
Srivastava, R. A. (2003). Scavenger receptor class B type I expression in murine brain and regulation by estrogen and dietary cholesterol. J. Neurol. Sci. 210, 11–18. doi: 10.1016/s0022-510x(03)00006-6
Streit, W. J., Braak, H., Xue, Q.-S., and Bechmann, I. (2009). Dystrophic (senescent) rather than activated microglial cells are associated with tau pathology and likely precede neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol. 118, 475–485. doi: 10.1007/s00401-009-0556-6
Svensson, L., Norén, K., Wiklund, O., Lindmark, H., Ohlsson, B., and Hulten, L. M. (2002). Inhibitory effects of N-acetylcysteine on scavenger receptor class A expression in human macrophages. J. Intern. Med. 251, 437–446. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2796.2002.00983.x
Thanopoulou, K., Fragkouli, A., Stylianopoulou, F., and Georgopoulos, S. (2010). Scavenger receptor class B type I (SR-BI) regulates perivascular macrophages and modifies amyloid pathology in an Alzheimer mouse model. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 107, 20816–20821. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1005888107
Thawkar, B. S., and Kaur, G. (2019). Inhibitors of NF-kappaB and P2X7/NLRP3/Caspase 1 pathway in microglia: novel therapeutic opportunities in neuroinflammation induced early-stage Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neuroimmunol. 326, 62–74. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2018.11.010
Tsai, A. P., Lin, P. B.-C., Dong, C., Moutinho, M., Casali, B. T., Liu, Y., et al. (2021). INPP5D expression is associated with risk for Alzheimer’s disease and induced by plaque-associated microglia. Neurobiol. Dis. 153:105303. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2021.105303
Ulland, T. K., Song, W. M., Huang, S. C., Ulrich, J. D., Sergushichev, A., Beatty, W. L., et al. (2017). TREM2 maintains microglial metabolic fitness in Alzheimer’s disease. Cell 170, 649–663.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.07.023
Ulrich, J. D., Ulland, T. K., Mahan, T. E., Nystrom, S., Nilsson, K. P., Song, W. M., et al. (2018). ApoE facilitates the microglial response to amyloid plaque pathology. J. Exp. Med. 215, 1047–1058. doi: 10.1084/jem.20171265
Wang, Y., Cella, M., Mallinson, K., Ulrich, J. D., Young, K. L., Robinette, M. L., et al. (2015). TREM2 lipid sensing sustains the microglial response in an Alzheimer’s disease model. Cell 160, 1061–1071. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.049
Wang, S., Mustafa, M., Yuede, C. M., Salazar, S. V., Kong, P., Long, H., et al. (2020). Anti-human TREM2 induces microglia proliferation and reduces pathology in an Alzheimer’s disease model. J. Exp. Med. 217:e20200785. doi: 10.1084/jem.20200785
Wang, H.-M., Zhang, T., Huang, J.-K., Xiang, J.-Y., Chen, J.-J., Fu, J.-L., et al. (2017). Edaravone attenuates the proinflammatory response in amyloid-beta-treated microglia by inhibiting NLRP3 inflammasome-mediated IL-1beta secretion. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 43, 1113–1125. doi: 10.1159/000481753
Wilkinson, B. L., Cramer, P. E., Varvel, N. H., Reed-Geaghan, E., Jiang, Q., Szabo, A., et al. (2012). Ibuprofen attenuates oxidative damage through NOX2 inhibition in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Aging 33, 197.e21–197.e32. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.06.014
Xue, J., Schmidt, S. V., Sander, J., Draffehn, A., Krebs, W., Quester, I., et al. (2014). Transcriptome-based network analysis reveals a spectrum model of human macrophage activation. Immunity 40, 274–288. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.01.006
Yan, Q., Zhang, J., Liu, H., Babu-Khan, S., Vassar, R., Biere, A. L., et al. (2003). Anti-inflammatory drug therapy alters beta-amyloid processing and deposition in an animal model of Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neurosci. 23, 7504–7509. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-20-07504.2003
Yang, R., Wang, Q., Li, F., Li, J., and Liu, X. (2015). Edaravone injection ameliorates cognitive deficits in rat model of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurol. Sci. 36, 2067–2072. doi: 10.1007/s10072-015-2314-y
Yesner, L. M., Huh, H. Y., Pearce, S. F., and Silverstein, R. L. (1996). Regulation of monocyte CD36 and thrombospondin-1 expression by soluble mediators. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 16, 1019–1025. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.16.8.1019
Yin, Z., Raj, D., Saiepour, N., Van Dam, D., Brouwer, N., Holtman, I. R., et al. (2017). Immune hyperreactivity of Abeta plaque-associated microglia in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Aging 55, 115–122. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2017.03.021
Yin, J., Zhao, F., Chojnacki, J. E., Fulp, J., Klein, W. L., Zhang, S., et al. (2018). NLRP3 inflammasome inhibitor ameliorates amyloid pathology in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Mol. Neurobiol. 55, 1977–1987. doi: 10.1007/s12035-017-0467-9
Yoshimura, A., Nishinakamura, H., Matsumura, Y., and Hanada, T. (2005). Negative regulation of cytokine signaling and immune responses by SOCS proteins. Arthritis Res. Ther. 7, 100–110. doi: 10.1186/ar1741
Zhang, S., Hu, L., Jiang, J., Li, H., Wu, Q., Ooi, K., et al. (2020). HMGB1/RAGE axis mediates stress-induced RVLM neuroinflammation in mice via impairing mitophagy flux in microglia. J. Neuroinflammation 17:15. doi: 10.1186/s12974-019-1673-3
Zhang, M., Schmitt-Ulms, G., Sato, C., Xi, Z., Zhang, Y., Zhou, Y., et al. (2016). Drug repositioning for Alzheimer’s disease based on systematic ‘omics’ data mining. PLoS One 11:e0168812. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168812
Zhang, H., Su, Y.-J., Zhou, W.-W., Wang, S.-W., Xu, P.-X., Yu, X.-L., et al. (2014). Activated scavenger receptor A promotes glial internalization of abeta. PLoS One 9:e94197. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094197
Zhao, L. (2019). CD33 in Alzheimer’s disease—biology, pathogenesis, and therapeutics: a mini-review. Gerontology 65, 323–331. doi: 10.1159/000492596
Zhu, X.-C., Dai, W.-Z., and Ma, T. (2020). Impacts of CR1 genetic variants on cerebrospinal fluid and neuroimaging biomarkers in Alzheimer’s disease. BMC Med. Genet. 21:181. doi: 10.1186/s12881-020-01114-x
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease, β-amyloid, microglia, neuroinflammation, tau
Citation: Zhang G, Wang Z, Hu H, Zhao M and Sun L (2021) Microglia in Alzheimer’s Disease: A Target for Therapeutic Intervention. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 15:749587. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2021.749587
Received: 29 July 2021; Accepted: 28 October 2021;
Published: 24 November 2021.
Edited by:
Xianli Shen, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, United StatesReviewed by:
Sónia C. Correia, University of Coimbra, PortugalZheng Wei, Yale University, United States
Copyright © 2021 Zhang, Wang, Hu, Zhao and Sun. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Li Sun, sunli99@jlu.edu.cn