Impact Factor 3.508

Frontiers journals are at the top of citation and impact metrics

Brief Research Report ARTICLE

Front. Neurol., 13 September 2018 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00764

Melanopsin-Driven Pupil Response and Light Exposure in Non-seasonal Major Depressive Disorder

Beatrix Feigl1,2,3*, Govinda Ojha1,2, Leanne Hides4 and Andrew J. Zele1,5*
  • 1Medical Retina and Visual Science Laboratories, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
  • 2School of Biomedical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
  • 3Queensland Eye Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
  • 4School of Psychology, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
  • 5School of Optometry and Vision Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

Background: Melanopsin-expressing intrinsically photosensitive Retinal Ganglion Cells (ipRGCs) signal non-imaging forming effects of environmental light for circadian phoentrainment, the pupil light reflex, and mood regulation. In seasonal affective disorder, ipRGC dysfunction is thought to cause abberant transmission of the external illumination for photoentrainment. It is not known if patients with non-seasonal depression have abnormal melanospin mediated signaling and/or irregular environmental light exposure.

Methods: Twenty-one adults who live in a sub-tropical region, including eight patients with non-seasonal depression and thirteen age-matched healthy controls were recruited. The Mini International Neuropsychiatry Interview diagnosed the presence of a major depressive disorder. Light exposure was determined using actigraphy over a 2 week period. The melanopsin mediated post-illumination pupil response (PIPR) and outer retinal inputs to ipRGCs (transient pupil response and maximum pupil constriction amplitude) were measured in response to 1 s, short and long wavelength light with high and low melanopsin excitation.

Results: The mean daylight exposure as a function of clock hours and total light exposure duration (mins) to illumination levels commonly recommended for depression therapy were not significantly different between groups. Out of 84 pupil measurements (42 each in the depression and control groups), the melanopsin-mediated PIPR amplitude, transient pupil response, and pupil constriction amplitude were not significantly different between groups.

Conclusions: This report provides initial evidence of normal melanopsin function and environmental light exposures in patients with pre-dominately mid and moderate non-seasonal depression in a subtropical location in the southern hemisphere.

Introduction

The discovery of projections of melanopsin-expressing intrinsically photosensitive Retinal Ganglion Cells (ipRGCs) to brain mood centers (1) has redefined understanding of light-mediated mood regulation (2, 3). These inner retinal cells have major roles in non-image-forming functions including entrainment of the body clock to a ~24 h day-night circadian rhythm (4), regulating the pupil light response (5, 6) as well as in image forming brightness perception, temporal, and color processing in humans (79). The post-illumination pupil response (PIPR) (6) is the sustained pupil constriction to high irradiance, short wavelength light that is controlled by the intrinsic melanopsin response from ~1.8 s onwards after light offset (10). During light stimulation, outer retinal inputs to ipRGCs can be assessed with the transient pupil light response (transient PLR) and peak constriction amplitude, with melanopsin contributing to the maintenance of pupil constriction (11, 12).

In seasonal affective disorder (SAD), the melanopsin-mediated PIPR is attenuated (2) whereas daily light exposure and time spent under bright illumination (>1,000 lux) is not different to healthy individuals (13), indicating that impaired light signaling due to ipRGC dysfunction can influence mood in SAD. In contrast, the PIPR amplitudes were normal in a combined cohort of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) with SAD (n = 7) and non-seasonal depressive disorder (n = 12) (14). These non-significant differences may reflect the mixed cohort of patients (with and without seasonal depression) and the high variability in the data in the MDD group (14). In MDD patients and healthy controls in the northern hemisphere, the PIPR amplitude is less pronounced in winter compared to the summer months with longer daylight hours (14) and irrespective of season, the transient pupil response to dim light is impaired in MDD, which may reflect dysfunctional outer retinal inputs to ipRGCs (14). The link between light exposure and melanopsin function in patients with MDD, and in particular in non-seasonal depression, has not been examined. This study therefore objectively determined the mean daylight and daily hourly light exposure and duration of exposure to illumination levels recommended for light therapy in depression (15) in a group of patients with non-seasonal depression and healthy participants, and quantified melanopsin function with an optimized pupillometric paradigm that is robust to the presence of subtle melanopsin defects at early stages of retinal disease (16, 17).

Methods

Participants

Twenty-one participants aged between 18 and 61 years, including eight patients (38 ± 15 yrs) with non-seasonal depressive disorder (seven female and one male) diagnosed as mild (n = 1) moderate (n = 5), and severe (n = 1) MDD and thirteen age-matched healthy controls (30 ± 7.7 yrs) (6 females, 7 males) were recruited. The recruitment period was classified as summer dominating months (November–March) or winter dominating months (April–August) in Brisbane, Australia, a sub-tropical location in the southern hemisphere. The MDD group without seasonal depression were assessed by a clinical psychologist using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) (18), and had at least mild levels of depressive symptoms in the last 2 weeks on the Beck Depression Inventory-II (19) and a negative screen on both, clinician-rated and self-report measures of SAD including the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-Seasonal Affective Disorder (HDRS-SAD) (20) and the Seasonal Pattern Assessment Questionnaire (SPAQ) (21). The healthy control group was required to have a negative screen on all measures of depressive disorders. All participants had normal visual acuity (>6/6), color vision (Lanthony D-15), normal intraocular pressure and ophthalmoscopy. Participants with history of eye surgery or disease, lens opacification > grade 2 on LOCS III, cognitive impairment and/or intellectual disability and those with circadian disruption (e.g., shift workers or had recently traveled different time zones) were excluded.

Patient Assessment

Each of the 21 participants wore an Actiwatch (Geneactiv, Activinsights, Cambridge shire, UK) for 2 weeks. Actigraphy data were used to calculate the participants' individual light exposure duration to the recommended illuminance of broadband white lights (10,000, 5000, and 2500 lux) used for depression treatment (15). Artifacts were detected and removed in 0.8% of the patients with depression and 4% of the control participants. The time to first light, last light, and the global solar exposure (GSE) in the study location was recorded every day for each participant from the websites of WillyWeather (22) and the Australian Government Bureau of Meteorology (23). The subjective sleep onset latency (time to sleep after going to bed) was derived from the participants' self-reported sleep chart. The mid-sleep time derived from their actigraphy data was computed to compare the circadian phase and chronotype between the MDD and control groups (24).

The pupil light reflex was measured in response to a 1 s stimulus using a custom built, extended Maxwellian view pupillometer according to established laboratory procedures (25, 26) between 10 AM and 5 PM to minimize the effect of circadian variation on PIPR function (27). The left pupil was dilated and the consensual pupil response of the right eye was recorded. The stimuli (repeated twice for each condition) included a short (464 nm) and long wavelength (637 nm) light matched to a corneal irradiance of 15.5 log quanta.cm−2.s−1. The pupil metrics quantified were the 6 s PIPR, the transient PLR and the maximum pupil constriction (peak PLR) (25).

Statistical Analysis

Statistical data analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS 22 (SPSS, NY: IBM Corp). The MDD and control groups were compared on daily average light exposure, duration spent under light levels ≥ 10,000, ≥ 5,000, and ≥ 2,500 lux and pupil metrics using independent t-tests or a Mann-Whitney U test. Hourly light exposure (lux) were log transformed to meet the assumptions for parametric statistical analysis. The relationship between non-seasonal depression, pupil metrics, and light exposure was assessed using Pearson's or Spearman's correlation. Simple linear regression models were used to analyse the presence of linear relationship among the variables.

Results

Given the known effects of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SNRIs) on the baseline pupil diameter, pupil constriction amplitude and the PIPR (28), a separate analysis excluding the patients taking SNRIs showed no significant group difference in the baseline pupil diameter (U = 33.5, p = 0.6), and peak PLR (blue, U = 34, p = 0.7; red, U = 36, p = 0.8) and PIPR amplitudes (blue, U = 37, p = 0.9; red, U = 26, p = 0.3). There are contentious reports of the effects of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRI), with either no effect (28) or increasing pupil diameter (29); in this study, four patients were taking the drug but there were no significant difference in resting baseline pupil diameter compared to the control group. Similarly, other less commonly used psychotropic drugs did not have a significant effect on PIPR amplitudes (antimanic drug, Mann-Whitney U = 38, p = 0.9; agomelatine, U = 43, p = 0.9; MAOI (monoamine oxidase inhibitor), U = 38, p = 0.6).

There was no significant difference between the groups for age (U = 31.5, p = 0.1), the global solar exposure (GSE) (U = 33, p = 0.2) and the photoperiods [t(19) = 2.0, p = 0.06]. The mean (± SD) BDI-II scores for MDD and control groups were 25.8 ± 5.7 and 0.5 ± 0.9, respectively (U = 0, p < 0.0001). The sleep length (U = 44, p = 0.6) and mid-sleep times [t(19) = 0.1, p = 0.9] were not significantly different between the groups indicating the groups were comparable on circadian phase and chronotype.

The average light exposure at every clock hour over the 2 week recording period using a 24 h period were not significantly different between the MDD group and healthy controls [F(23, 408) = 0.4, p = 0.9] (Figures 1A,B). The mean daylight exposure in the MDD group was also not significantly different from controls [t(19) = 0.9, p = 0.3] (Figure 1B). During the day (8:00–16:00 clock hours), both groups were exposed for at least 8 h after wake time to photopic illumination equivalent to that on an overcast day (~1,000 lux) (Figure 1B). During the evening (16:00–18:00 clock hours), both groups experienced light levels equivalent to an office light exposure (250–500 lux) (Figure 1B). During the night hours, both groups were exposed to illumination level common to the mesopic range and the scotopic ranges (30) and the median nightlight exposure was not significantly different between groups (Mann-Whitney U = 50, p = 0.9) (Figure 1B).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. (A,B) Average light exposure (illumination, Lux) over a 2-week period as function of (A) daily mean (±SD) clock hours and (B) circadian hours, with circadian time referenced to individual wake time (defined as zero after-wake time) to mimimize individual differences in light exposure due to differences in participant wake times. (C) Daily duration of exposure to illuminance levels recommended for depression light therapy in patients with depression and controls are shown. (D) The mean pupil light responses and 95% confidence intervals to the two stimuli (blue, red) for patients with depression and control particpants. For all particpants and both stimulus wavelengths, Box-and-Whisker plots show the median, 25 and 75% quartiles and range of the (E) PIPR amplitudes, (F) peak constriction amplitude, and (G) transient PLR. The blue lines represent the data measured with the short wavelength (blue) light (464 nm); red lines represent the data measured with the long wavelength (red) light (637 nm).

The light exposure levels were not significantly different between season (summer or winter) or time of day for the two groups [F(23, 408) = 0.9, p = 0.6]. The duration (mins) of light exposure under illuminations commonly recommended for depression light therapy (≥ 10,000 lux) (15) did not differ between groups (Mann-Whitney U = 43, p = 0.5), ≥ 5000 lux [t(19) = 0.5, p = 0.6] and ≥ 2500 lux [t(19) = 0.8, p = 0.43] (Figure 1C).

Each participant underwent four pupil measurements (2 blue and 2 red) resulting in a total of 84 pupil recordings. Table 1 outlines the mean pupil light reflex data for both groups. Figure 1D shows the mean pupil response (± 95% confidence intervals) to 1 s short wavelength (blue) and long wavelength (red) light stimuli. The baseline pupil diameter was not significantly different between the groups [t(19) = 0.7, p = 0.5]. The PIPR amplitudes were also not significantly different between groups [t(19) = 0.02, p = 0.9] (Figure 1E). There was no difference in PIPR amplitudes for participants recruited during the summer and winter dominating months [t(29) = 1.4, p = 0.2]. Peak constriction and transient PLR amplitudes (Figures 1F,G) were not different between the groups for blue [peak, t(19) = 0.9, p = 0.4; transient PLR, t(19) = 0.4, p = 0.7] or red stimuli [peak PLR, Mann-Whitney U = 37, p = 0.3; transient PLR, t(19) = 0.3, p = 0.7]. There was no linear relationship between light exposure and PIPR amplitude in the MDD [F(1, 6) = 0.6, R2 = 0.1, p = 0.5] or control group [F(1, 11) = 2.1, R2 = 0.2, p = 0.2].

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Pupil metrics (mean and 95% CL) for the two participant groups.

Discussion

This study provides the initial evidence that there are no significant differences between patients with mainly moderate and mild non-seasonal MDD and healthy controls in either daily and hourly light exposure or the duration spent under bright illuminations commonly recommended for light therapy in MDD. The findings of normal PIPR amplitudes and transient PLR to stimuli with high melanopsin excitation are consistent with a recent study based in the northern hemisphere that investigated 12 MDD patients with non-seasonal depressive disorder (14). That study however, did not record detailed light exposure data in their control group. That a previous study in 15 patients with SAD detected a significant reduction in the melanopsin-mediated PIPR amplitude (2), may indicate different pathomechanisms are involved in SAD, and/or that different ipRGCs subtypes, including those that do not primarily signal to the OPN to regulate the pupil, are differentially affected in the two conditions. M1 ipRGC subtypes have more projections to the SCN than other brain areas (31) which implies that they may have a more prominent role in photoentrainment than in other behavioral functions such as mood. Within M1 subtypes, there is evidence from mouse models that Brn3b-positive M1 ipRGCs project to the OPN shell to control the pupil light reflex and to many other brain areas, whereas Brn3b-negative M1 cells only project to the SCN to drive circadian photoentrainment (32). Based on this, it could be postulated that Brn3b-positive M1 subtypes might be spared in non-seasonal depression, but further evidence is needed in human studies to directly examine this.

We did not find a positive correlation between the PIPR and longer day light hours as previously observed in a study performed in MDD and healthy controls (14). These contrasting findings may be due to the higher light exposure in this geographical area in the southern hemisphere. Importantly, with the melanopsin threshold at ~11.0 quanta.cm−2.s−1 (33), in our sample light exposure levels were above this threshold throughout their entire wake time in both the summer and winter seasons. Therefore a correlation between the PIPR amplitude and season is not to be expected in study locations closer to the equator.

The small sample of patients with non-seasonal depression is a limitation, and similarly sized to a study evaluating the relationship between non-seasonal MDD and the PIPR in the northern hemisphere (14). We augment existing studies in MDD by providing well defined melanopsin driven pupil responses and initial data on light exposure in a cohort of patients with mainly mild/moderate non-seasonal depression residing in the southern hemisphere. These data can provide a starting point for large-scale, controlled, multi-center studies evaluating the role of the melanopsin pathway in MDD that may lead to targeted, irradiance and wavelength dependent light treatment in MDD in the future.

Ethics Statement

The study followed the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Queensland University of Technology Human research Ethics Committee (Approval Number: 1500000597). Informed written consent was obtained and each participant was offered a $30 gift voucher to compensate for their participation in the study.

Author Contributions

BF and AJZ conceptualized the experiment. BF, AJZ, GO, and LH are responsible for research design, data acquisition, data analysis and interpretation, and manuscript preparation. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Funding

Supported by Australian Research Council Discovery Projects (ARC-DP170100274, AJZ and BF) and an IHBI Vision and Eye Program Grant (BF and AJZ). The funding organization had no role in the design or conduct of this research.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

1. Gooley JJ, Lu J, Fischer D, Saper CB. A broad role for melanopsin in nonvisual photoreception. J Neurosci. (2003) 23:7093–106. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-18-07093.2003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Roecklein K, Wong P, Ernecoff N, Miller M, Donofry S, Kamarck M, et al. The post illumination pupil response is reduced in seasonal affective disorder. Psychiatry Res. (2013) 210:150–8. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2013.05.023

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. LeGates TA, Altimus CM, Wang H, Lee HK, Yang S, Zhao H, et al. Aberrant light directly impairs mood and learning through melanopsin-expressing neurons. Nature (2012) 491:594–8. doi: 10.1038/nature11673

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Berson DM, Dunn FA, Takao M. Phototransduction by retinal ganglion cells that set the circadian clock. Science (2002) 295:1070–3. doi: 10.1126/science.1067262

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Hattar S, Liao HW, Takao M, Berson DM, Yau KW. Melanopsin containing retinal ganglion cells: architecture, projections and intrinsic photosensitivity. Science (2002) 295:1065–70. doi: 10.1126/science.1069609

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Gamlin PD, McDougal DH, Pokorny J, Smith VC, Yau KW, Dacey DM. Human and macaque pupil responses driven by melanopsin-containing retinal ganglion cells. Vision Res. (2007) 47:946–54. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.12.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Zele AJ, Adhikari P, Feigl B, Cao D. Cone and melanopsin contributions to human brightness estimation. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. (2018) 35:B19–25. doi: 10.1364/JOSAA.35.000B19

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Zele AJ, Feigl B, Adhikari P, Maynard ML, Cao D. Melanopsin photoreception contributes to human visual detection, temporal ans colour processing. Sci Rep. (2018) 8:3842. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-22197-w

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Brown TM, Tsujimura S, Allen AE, Wynne J, Bedford R, Vickery G, et al. Melanopsin-based brightness discrimination in mice and humans. Curr Biol. (2012) 22:1134–41. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.04.039

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Adhikari P, Feigl B, Zele AJ. Rhodopsin and melanopsin contributions to the early redilation phase of the post-illumonation pupil response (PIPR). PLoS ONE (2016) 11:e0161175. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161175

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Kardon R, Anderson SC, Damarjian TG, Grace EM, Stone E, Kawaski A. Chromatic pupil responses: preferential activiation of melanopsin mediated versus outer photoreceptor-mediated pupil light reflex. Ophthalmology (2009) 116:1564–73. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.02.007

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. McDougal DH, Gamlin PD. The influence of intrinsically-photosensitive retinal ganglion cells on the spectral sensitivity and response dynamics of the human pupillary light reflex. Vision Res. (2010) 50:72–87. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.10.012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Graw P, Recker S, Sand L, Kräuchi K, Wirz-Justice A. Winter and summer outdoor light exposure in women with and without seasonal affective disorder. J Affect Disord. (1999) 56:163–9.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

14. Laurenzo SA, Kardon R, Ledolter J, Poolman P, Schumacher AM, Potash JB, et al. Pupillary response abnormalities in depressive disorders. Psychiatry Res. (2016) 246:492–9. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.10.039

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Glickman G, Byrne B, Pineda C, Hauck WW, Brainard GC. Light therapy for seasonal affective disorder with blue narrow-band light-emitting diodes (LEDs). Biol Psychiatry (2006) 59:502–7. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.07.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Adhikari P, Zele AJ, Thomas R, Feigl B. Quadrant field pupillometry detects melanopsin dysfunction in glaucoma suspects and early glaucoma. Sci Rep. (2016) 6:33373. doi: 10.1038/srep33373

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Maynard ML, Zele AJ, Feigl B. Melanopsin mediated post-illumination pupil response in early age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. (2015) 56:6906–13. doi: 10.1167/iovs.15-17357

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Lecrubier Y, Sheehan D, Weiller E, Amorim P, Bonora I, Sheehan K, et al. The Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). A short diagnostic structured interview: reliability and validity according to the CIDI. Eur Psychiatry (1997) 12:224–31.

Google Scholar

19. Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK. The Beck Depression Inventory-II. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Coporation (1996).

20. Williams JB. A structured interview guide for the Hamilton depression rating scale. Arch Gen Psychiatry (1988) 45:742–7.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

21. Kasper S, Wehr TA, Bartko JJ, Gaist PA, Rosenthal NE. Epidemiological findings of seasonal changes in mood and behavior. A telephone survey of Montgomery County, Maryland. Arch Gen Psychiatry (1989) 46:823–33.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

22. WillyWeather. Brisbane Sunrise / Sunset Times Brisbane (2018). Available online at: https://wwwwillyweathercomau (Accessed 21st May, 2018).

23. Australian Government BOM. Daily Global Solar Exposure, Brisbane (2018). Available online at: www.bom.gov.au (Accessed 21st May, 2018).

24. Van der Meijden WP, Van Someren JL, te Lindert BH, Bruijel J, van Oosterhout, FCoppens JE, et al. Individual differences in sleep timing relate to melanopsin based phototransduction in healthy adolecednts and yound adults. Sleep (2016) 39:1305–10. doi: 10.5665/sleep.5858

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Adhikari P, Zele AJ, Feigl B. The Post-Illumination Pupil Response (PIPR). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. (2015) 56:3838–49. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-16233

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Feigl B, Zele AJ. Melanopsin expressing intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells in retinal disease. Optom Vis Sci. (2014) 91:894–903. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000284

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Zele AJ, Feigl B, Smith S, Markwell EM. The circadian response of intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells. PLoS ONE (2011) 6:e17860. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017860

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Bitsios P, Szabadi E, Bradshaw CM. Comparison of the effects of venlafaxine, paroxetine and desipramine on the pupillary light reflex in man. Psychopharmacology (1999) 143:286–92.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

29. Schmitt JA, Riedel WJ, Vuurman EF, Kruizinga M, Ramaekers JG. Modulation of the critical flicker fusion effects of serotonin reuptake inhibitors by concomitant pupillary changes. Psychopharmacology (2002) 160:381–6. doi: 10.1007/s00213-001-0993-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Zele AJ, Cao D. Vision under mesopic and scotopic illumination. Front Psychol (2015) 5:1594. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01594

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Fernandez DC, Chang YT, Hattar S, Chen SK. Architecture of retinal projections to the central circadian pacemaker. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2016) 113:6047–52. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1523629113

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Chen SK, Badea TC, Hattar S. Photoentrainment and pupillary light reflex are mediated by distinct populations of ipRGCs. Nature (2011) 476:92–5. doi: 10.1038/nature10206

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Dacey DM, Liao HW, Peterson BB, Robinson FR, Smith VC, Pokorny J, et al. Melanopsin-expressing ganglion cells in primate retina signal colour and irradiance and project to the LGN. Nature (2005) 433:749–54. doi: 10.1038/nature03387

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: pupil, melanopsin, light exposure, depression, MDD = major depressive disorder

Citation: Feigl B, Ojha G, Hides L and Zele AJ (2018) Melanopsin-Driven Pupil Response and Light Exposure in Non-seasonal Major Depressive Disorder. Front. Neurol. 9:764. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00764

Received: 13 June 2018; Accepted: 23 August 2018;
Published: 13 September 2018.

Edited by:

Piero Barboni, Studio Oculistico d'Azeglio, Italy

Reviewed by:

Chiara La Morgia, Università degli Studi di Bologna, Italy
Dan Milea, Singapore National Eye Center, Singapore

Copyright © 2018 Feigl, Ojha, Hides and Zele. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Beatrix Feigl, b.feigl@qut.edu.au
Andrew J. Zele, andrew.zele@qut.edu.au