Skip to main content

MINI REVIEW article

Front. Neurol., 14 December 2023
Sec. Autonomic Disorders
This article is part of the Research Topic Neurology and Connective Tissue View all 5 articles

Evaluation and management of orthostatic headache in hypermobility disorders

  • Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, United States

Headache is a frequent symptom among patients with hypermobility spectrum disorders. This mini review focuses specifically on a challenging aspect of headache evaluation in all patients, but especially those with hypermobility – the orthostatic headache. While the differential for an orthostatic headache is overall limited, patients with hypermobility disorders have risk factors for all of the most commonly encountered orthostatic headache disorders. The most common conditions to produce orthostatic headaches are discussed – spontaneous intracranial hypotension, cervicogenic headache, and postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome. Less common etiologies of orthostatic headache pertinent to any patient are presented in table format.

Introduction

Headache is one of the most common symptoms in the world, and it is particular prevelant amongst those with hypermobility disorders, affecting 86% of patients with hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos-Syndrome in one study (1). While most headaches experienced by patients with hypermobility are migraines (1), which are fairly easy to diagnose, the orthostatic headache poses a diagnostic dilemma. An orthostatic headache is defined as a headache that worsens in the upright posture and is relieved by recumbency (2). It needs to be carefully (clinically) distinguished from migraine, which worsens with physical activity but not posture per se (3). Orthostatic headaches are typically caused by spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH), cervicogenic mechanisms, and postural orthostatic tachycardia (POTS). Hypermobility is a shared risk factor for all 3 causes, and each may present with overlapping symptoms and “normal” imaging. This mini-review presents the defintion, mechanism of pain, link with hypermobility, clinically distinguishable presentations, diagnostic steps and treatments for the most common causes of orthostatic headache in hypermobility disorders. Less common etiologies of orthostatic headache pertinent to any patient are presented in table format (Table 1).

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Differential diagnosis of orthostatic headache.

Discussion

Spontaneous intracranial hypotension

The term orthostatic headache is nearly synonymous with SIH, and while not always correct (4), an orthostatic headache is indeed the most common symptom of SIH (57). Most cases of SIH result from spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks in the spine. Leaks occur at sites of pre-existing dural weakness caused by dural ectasias and nerve root sleeve meningeal diverticula, adjacent to osteophytes especially in the ventral thoracic spine, or via CSF-venous fistulas (which are typically associated with meningeal diverticula). A trivial trauma such as lifting or coughing may be associated with the onset of a leak (6). Any patient with dural ectasia, meningeal diverticula (Tarlov cysts, perineurial cysts), or sharp ostephytes can develop a CSF leak, but these risk factors are in particular common in patients with connective tissue disoders (8, 9).

Spinal CSF leaks cause the characteristic orthostatic headache due to the relationship of the leak to the zero-pressure point in the spine. The zero-pressure point is located in the cervical spine. This is the point at which the CSF pressure transitions from negative (intracranially) to positive (in the spine) in the upright position. Leaks caudal to the zero-pressure point will be promoted to leak in the patient’s upright position in the face of a positive spinal pressure, creating an even lower than normal intracranial pressure when upright. The recumbent position reduces the spinal CSF pressure, equalizes the CSF pressure amongst the cranial and spinal compartment, in turn reducing the spinal leak and improving symptoms (7). Several mechanisms of head pain are implicated. A consequence of the leak below the zero-pressure point in the spine is a vacuum-like downward traction on the brain. Traction on pain-sensitive intracranial structures including the dura, venous sinuses, and cranial nerves produces pain. Not all patients with SIH manifest brain sag, and it is thought that compensatory venous distention involving the dura, venous sinuses, and around the cranial nerves also causes pain (6).

The incidence of SIH is estimated at 5 per 100,000 or 0.005% of the population (7). With fragile, at-risk, dura being nearly a sine-qua-non for SIH, it is no surprise that this syndrome is linked to hypermobility spectrum disorders. The exact prevalence of SIH in hypermobility spectrum disorders is unknown, but in prospective SIH studies, between 16 to 38% of patients showed features of Marfan syndrome, EDS, or joint hypermobility (10, 11).

The presentation of an orthostatic headache should almost always warrant exclusion of SIH. The orthostatic headache of SIH may be absent or very mild upon waking, but with prolonged time upright (2 h) starts or intensifies, being relieved by recumbency. It is not unusual for the headache syndrome to begin as a new daily persistent headache, or a thunderclap onset headache followed by new daily orthostatic headache (12). However, the headaches of SIH are not always orthostatic and may actually be absent completely. They may be purely exertional, valsalva-induced, or paradoxical headaches worse in recumbency, mimicking so called high pressure headaches (6). The presence of any of these headache types at any point in the history of an orthostatic headache should further the suspicion for SIH. Other common symptoms include but are not limited to neck pain or stiffness, nausea, dizziness, tinnitus, muffled or distorted hearing, and diplopia, and are also typically orthostatic or occuring in the second-half of the day (6). This clinical history warrants an MRI of the brain with contrast to look for the typical stigmata of intracranial hypotension (pachymeningeal enhancement, venous sinus distension, pituitary engorgement, sagging brainstem, and cerebellar tonsillar descent). If possible, an MRI of the entire spine should be done (contrast is not necessary) to either visualize the leak (if a spinal epidural fluid collection is present) or evaluate the risk factors for leak formation (i.e., spondylosis, meningeal diverticula). A meta-analysis found that up to 19% of patients with SIH have normal (absent) brain MRI findings (13). If clinical suspicion remains high, especially higher than other differential possibilities, non-targeted high volume lumbar epidural blood patching can be performed. Patients who do not respond to non-targeted blood patching at all (and the dignosis is still considered), or who respond to patching only temporarily are then generally considered for myelography for CSF leak localization to plan targeted treatements. The choice of myelographic technique depends on the suspected underlying cause of leak (i.e., dural tear from an osteophyte, leaking meningeal diverticulum, or CSF venous fistula) typically derived from the MRI spine (12). Several myelograms and several treatment sessions may be required to arrive at a diagnosis and cure. An increasing number of negative diagnostics, and lack of response to multiple targeted leak treatments does not exclude SIH from the differential, but should lead the provider to explore additional causes of orthostatic headache, as decribed further below.

Cervicogenic headache and cervical myofacial pain

Cervicogenic headache represents a heterogeneous collection of disorders, in common representing referred pain to the head. There is no consensus on the single definition of cervicogenic headache so the true prevalence of this condition is unknown (14, 15). The accepted causes of cervicogenic headache are cervical structures innervated by the C1, C2, and C3 nerve roots. Convergence of both nociceptive information from the upper three cervical nerve roots, and the trigeminal nerve at the level of the trigeminal nucleus caudalis in the brainstem is what allows this so called cervicogenic referral of pain to the head (14). The potential sources of pain include: the atlanto-occipital joint, the lateral atlanto-axial joint, the C2 nerve root itself, possibly the C2-3 disc, and the C2-3 facet joint (14). The typical pathologies include degeneration, trauma (for example, whiplash), or inflammation of the respective structure (16).

The osseous portion of the cervical spine is naturally the most mobile segment of the spine in order to allow a wide degree of forward and lateral flexion, extension, and rotation. With this great movement however comes the need for great stability. The spine is stabilized by capsular liagments, the ligaments flavum, the anterior longitudinal ligament, and the posterior longitudinal ligament. The capsular ligaments are extremely strong ligaments wrapped around the facet joints, and serve as the main stabilizers of the spine especially during movement. Cervical instability can result from ligamentous laxity, developing either slowly over time with repeated micro stressors, or from a single load such as a whiplash injury (17). The ligaments do not act alone in stabilizing the spine, the paraspinal musculature plays a significant, albeit secondary role as well. The ligaments contain mechanoreceptors which when stimulated, activate the protective ligamento-muscular reflex to cause a compensatory muscle stiffness (18).

While cervicogenic headache is strictly speaking referred pain from the upper cervical spine, cervical myofacial pain anywhere in the upper or lower neck can refer pain to the head, better termed tension-type headache (16). Cervical myofacial pain of the head and neck, like any myofacial pain syndrome, relies on the formation of trigger points. A trigger point is a defined area of tenderness located within a skeletal muscle, tendon, or ligament. When latent, palpation of the trigger point produces local pain alone but when active, palpation of the trigger point also causes a reproducible referral of pain away from the location of the trigger point (19). While trigger point referral patterns may vary from patient to patient, there are numerous well known trigger point maps identified in humans, many of them responsible for a “cervicogenic” source of headache. For example, pain in the supraorbital or retro-orbital region may be referred from the sternocleidomastoid, the trapezius, or the suboccipital muscles. Likewise, the sternocleidomastoid may also refer pain to the forehead, temple and the vertex. Temple pain may also originate from the trapezius, splenius capitus, suboccipitalis, splenius cervicis, and semispinalis capitis. Occipital pain may originate from the trapezius, levator scapulae, or the semispinalis capitis (19, 20). A comprehensive review of human myofasical trigger points is beyond the scope of this review, however, well-defined human trigger point maps are easily available online (19) and in published literature such as Davies’ The Trigger Point Therapt Workbook (20). Trigger points develop for a variety of reasons, many of them common to hypermobililty. The aforementioned muscle stiffness occuring as a protective reflex to chronic cervical instability is in this author’s opinion the biggest driver. Poor postural habits, lack of exercise, sleep disturbances, malocclusion such as that resulting from temporomandibular joint disease have also been shown to play a role (19). Cervicogenic headaches do not have to be, but can be, orthostatic for a variety of reasons. Upright posture causes an axial loading force, exerted by the weight of the head, on the cervical spine (21). Postures that promote the development of muscle tension and myofacial trigger points, such are head forward posture, are inherent to sitting or standing (22). In the presence of ligamentous cervical instability, it is intuitive that the supine (resting) position naturally reduces exaggerated movement, minimizing strain.

There are no pathogneumonic phenotypes assigned to cervicogenic headache and tension headache referred from the neck in part because this is a collection of multiple disorders. While history and physical exam are helpful in including these etiologies in the differential, the diagnosis may ultimately rest on response to treatment (i.e., a diagnostic and therapeutic procedure). The clinical history that would support cervicogenic headache is of a unilateral pain without side-shift. The pain should be triggered by neck movement, awkward posture, or palpation of the posterior neck. It may be episodic or continuous, and typically moderate in intensity and non-throbbing (14).

The most common cause of a true cervicogenic headache is C2-3 facet joint pathology (spondylosis or capsular strain) (14). The C2-3 facet joint is innervated by the third occipital nerve, a branch of the C3 dorsal ramus (16). The joint itself, located at the level of the mandible, may be tender. Referred pain to the occipital, and less likely the parietal, frontal, and orbital regions may occur. The diagnosis would be confirmed by a third occipital nerve block; a C2-3 facet intra-articular steroid injection or third occipital nerve radiofrequency ablation would serve a therapeutic role (16). Table 2 presents the referral paterns, expected examination findings, diagnostic and therapeutic interventions for the remaining causes of true cervicogenic headache.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Accepted structural causes of cervicogenic headache (1416).

This author’s preference and advice is to thoroughly investigate and treat myofascial sources of referred pain, prior to performing more invasive interventional diagnostics and treatment. For one, myofascial pain often coexists with “true” cervicogenic pathology because of the ligamento-muscular reflex, meaning it is not uncommon to have dual pain generators. Second, myofacial pain is often subject to a self-promoting cascade, in some causes causing more pain then the original joint insult itself. This occurs because sustained muscle contraction reduces the local muscular blood flow, depleting muscle energy reserves, causing more contracticle activity, perpetuating the cycle and eventually triggering inflammation and fibrosis within the surrounding intersitital connective tissues (19). To subject the patient to the least likely to harm interventions first, this author recommends to treat myofacial pain first.

Myofacial cervical pain is often described as pressure-like and dull, but may also feel like throbbing, sharp, stabbing, burning, and heavy. Intensity may range from mild to severe, and pain is usually steady or constant. It may be aggravated by stress, fatigue, chewing, and exercise. It typically has a slow and steady onset, but may occur acutely after a stressful event, trauma, or surgery or dental work particular when awkward postures are sustained. The physical exam may show abnormal posture, and elicitation of a referred pain pattern on examination is key. Myofascial pain is amenable to analgesic medication, topical cold and heat, trigger point massage, trigger point injections, transcutaneous electrical stimulation, and physiotherapy (19). Modifiable factors that lead to the development or perpetuation of myofascial pain should also be addressed including: improper posture, tension, inadequate sleep, and dental malocclusion (19).

Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome

Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome is an autonomic disorder most common in child-bearing age females, characterized by orthostatic tachycardia causing but not limited to: dizziness, presyncope, palpitations, fatigue, decreased concentration, tremulousness, and nausea (23, 24). Over half of patients with POTS were found to experience orthostatic headache (24), and POTS is common amongst patients on the hypermobility spectrum (25). The true mechanism of postural headache in POTS has not been well defined. Several mechanisms have been postulated. One thought is that patients develop a relative CSF hypovolemia, either through general hypovolemia or through enhanced spinal absorption. The latter theory implies there is a reduced venous return to the heart in the standing position, resulting in reduced spinal venous pressure, resulting in reduced CSF pressure as CSF is absorbed to the venous circulation. A second thought is that in POTS with severe orthostatic hypotension there is positional ischemia of the posterior neck and shoulder muscles, though this does not account for the variable distribution of head pain in POTS (23). POTS is diagnosed by the finding of a sustained heart rate increment ≥30 beats/min within 10 min of standing or head-up tilt in the absence of orthostatic hypotension (26). The orthostatic headaches of POTS and SIH may be indistinguishable on the basis of associated lightheadedness, fatigue, brain fog, vision blurring, neck pain and nausea. Complicating matters, the headache in both POTS and SIH may repond to volume repletion, abdominal compression (abdominal binder) (23) and temporarily even blood patching [Mokri et al. (23) proposed a mechanism of relative CSF hypovolemia]. POTS should be suspected when the headache is associated with symptoms not typical of SIH or cervicogenic headache including palpitations, tunnel vision, hyperventilation, shortness of breath, or anxiety and/or there are non-headache symptoms that would otherwise be absent in SIH or cervicogenic headache but common in POTS such as post-prandial malaise or onset of syndrome after a viral infection.

The evaluation of suspected POTS should include a detailed history to establish symptoms of orthostatic intolerance, physical examination with postural vital signs to confirm exaggerated tachycardia and absence of orthostatic hypotension, cardiac examination, neurologic examination identifying any features of peripheral neuropathy, laboratory examination with at minimum a complete blood count, electrolytes, thyroid function, and electrocardiogram. Conditions further suspected to be POTS should move on to a 10 min Head-up Tilt Test. The NASA Lean test is another way to easily detect orthostatic intolerance in the clinical setting (27). If small fiber neuropathy is suspected then quantitative sudomotor axon reflex testing and/or testing of epidermal nerve fiber density on skin biopsy is performed (28).

Non-pharmacologic measures build the foundation for treatment of POTS. Medications that worsen sinus tachcyardia such as stimulants or cause hypovolemia such as diuretics should be withdrawn where possible. Blood volume is expanded through a minimum intake of 2–3 L of water per day along with sodium in the form of table salt or electrolyte solutions. Patients are advised to wear abdominal compression binders or high-waist compression stockings to reduce lower body pooling of venous blood. Progressive exercise training to build endurance and increase leg resistance is integral to the treatment plan. The exercise program may initially be recumbent such as rowing, cycling, or swimming, progressing to upright exercise, and patients should be educated that they may initially feel worse. There are no FDA-approved drugs for the treatment of POTS. Pharmacologic therapy is aimed at reducing orthostatic intolerance and symptom management. Fludrocortisone is used as a theoretical blood volume expander. Beta blockers, ivabridine, and pyridostigmine are used to lower heart rate. Midodrine, octreotide, and methylphenidate may be used as vasocontrictors (28).

Conclusion

Some patients with hypermobility spectrum disorders are uniquely predisposed to orthostatic headaches from a variety of etiologies. In most cases, the clinical history, physical examination, and respective diagnostics should easily distinguish between SIH, cervicogenic headache, tension headache referred from cervical myofacial pain, and POTS. In cases were imaging is negative, using the phenotypic characteristics of the headache disorder is paramount in deciding on the initial treatment pathway.

Author contributions

OF: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interest

The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Malhotra, A, Pace, A, Ruiz Maya, T, Colman, R, Gelb, BD, Mehta, L, et al. Headaches in hypermobility syndromes: a pain in the neck? Am J Med Genet A. (2020) 182:2902–8. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.61873

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Montenegro, MM, and Cutsforth-Gregory, JK. Orthostatic headache after suboccipital Craniectomy without CSF leak: two case reports. Headache. (2018) 58:1238–43. doi: 10.1111/head.13346

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Olesen, J . Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS). The international classification of headache disorders. Cephalagia. (2013) 33:629–808. doi: 10.1177/0333102413485658

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Mehta, D, Cheema, S, Davagnanam, I, and Matharu, M. Diagnosis and treatment evaluation in patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension. Front Neurol. (2023) 14:5949. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1145949

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. D’amico, D, Usai, S, Chiapparini, L, Erbetta, A, Gioppo, A, Messina, G, et al. Headache in spontaneous intracranial hypotension: an overview with indications for differential diagnosis in the clinical practice. Neurol Sci. (2020) 41:423–7. doi: 10.1007/s10072-020-04642-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Mokri, B . Low cerebrospinal fluid pressure syndromes. Neurol Clin. (2004) 22:55–74. doi: 10.1016/S0733-8619(03)00089-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Kranz, PG, Gray, L, and Amrhein, TJ. Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension: 10 Myths and Misperceptions. Headache. (2018) 58:948–959. doi: 10.1111/head.13328

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Henderson, FC, Austin, C, Benzel, E, Bolognese, P, Ellenbogen, R, Francomano, CA, et al. Neurological and spinal manifestations of the Ehlers–Danlos syndromes. Am J Med Genet Part C Semin Med Genet. (2017) 175:195–211. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31549

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Marathe, N, Lohkamp, LN, and Fehlings, MG. Spinal manifestations of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: a scoping review. J Neurosurg Spine. (2022) 37:783–93. doi: 10.3171/2022.6.SPINE211011

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Schievink, WI, Gordon, OK, Tourje, J, Milhorat, TH, Awad, IA, Grossman, RG, et al. Connective tissue disorders with spontaneous spinal cerebrospinal fluid leaks and intracranial hypotension: a prospective study. Neurosurgery. (2004) 54:65–71. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000097200.18478.7B

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Mokri, B, Maher, CO, and Sencakova, D. Spontaneous CSF leaks: underlying disorder of connective tissue. Neurol Int. (2002) 58:814–6. doi: 10.1212/WNL.58.5.814

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Cheema, S, Anderson, J, Angus-Leppan, H, Armstrong, P, Butteriss, D, Carlton Jones, L, et al. Original research: multidisciplinary consensus guideline for the diagnosis and management of spontaneous intracranial hypotension. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. (2023) 94. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC10511987/:835–43. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2023-331166

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. D’Antona, L, Jaime Merchan, MA, Vassiliou, A, Watkins, LD, Davagnanam, I, Toma, AK, et al. Clinical presentation, investigation findings, and treatment outcomes of spontaneous intracranial hypotension syndrome: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Neurol. (2021) 78:329–37. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.4799

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Bogduk, N, and Govind, J. Cervicogenic headache: an assessment of the evidence on clinical diagnosis, invasive tests, and treatment. Lancet Neurol. (2009) 8:959–68. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70209-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. da Silva, M, Jr, H, and Bordini, CA. Cervicogenic headache. Curr Pain Headache Rep. (2006) 10:306–11. doi: 10.1007/s11916-006-0037-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Narouze, S . Practical approach to Cervicogenic headache. In: Ed. S. N. Narouze, Interventional management of head and face pain: nerve blocks and beyond. New York, NY: Springer. (2014). 67–72. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-8951-1_10

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Steilen, D, Hauser, R, Woldin, B, and Sawyer, S. Chronic neck pain: making the connection between capsular ligament laxity and cervical instability. Open Orthop J. (2014) 8 Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC4200875/:326–45. doi: 10.2174/1874325001408010326

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Solomonow, M, Zhou, BH, Harris, M, Lu, Y, and Baratta, RV. The Ligamento-muscular stabilizing system of the spine. Spine. (1998) 23:2552–62. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199812010-00010

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Fricton, JR, Kroening, RMD, Haley, D, and Siegert, R. Myofascial pain syndrome of the head and neck: a review of clinical characteristics of 164 patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. (1985) 60:615–23. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(85)90364-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Clair Davies, AD . Head, face, and neck. In: The trigger point therapy workbook. 3rd ed: Your Self-Treatment Guide for Pain Relief Oakland California: New Harbinger Publications, Inc. (2013). 55–88.

Google Scholar

21. Kimura, S, Hesselink, JR, Garfin, SR, Kawaji, Y, Hasegawa, K, and Hargens, AR. Axial load-dependent cervical spinal alterations during simulated upright posture: a comparison of healthy controls and patients with cervical degenerative disease. J Neurosurg Spine. (2005) 2:137–44. doi: 10.3171/spi.2005.2.2.0137

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Nejati, P, Lotfian, S, Moezy, A, Nejati, M, and Lotfian, S. Original paper the study of correlation between forward head posture and neck pain in Iranian office workers. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. (2015) 28:295–303. doi: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.00352

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Mokri, B, and Low, PA. Orthostatic headaches without CSF leak in postural tachycardia syndrome. Neurology. (2003) 61:980–2. doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000085868.37963.7D

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Khurana, RK, and Eisenberg, L. Orthostatic and non-orthostatic headache in postural tachycardia syndrome. Cephalalgia. (2011) 31:409–15. doi: 10.1177/0333102410382792

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Roma, M, Marden, CL, De Wandele, I, Francomano, CA, and Rowe, PC. Postural tachycardia syndrome and other forms of orthostatic intolerance in Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Auton Neurosci Basic Clin. (2018) 215:89–96. doi: 10.1016/j.autneu.2018.02.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Freeman, R, Wieling, W, Axelrod, FB, Benditt, DG, Benarroch, E, Biaggioni, I, et al. Consensus statement on the definition of orthostatic hypotension, neurally mediated syncope and the postural tachycardia syndrome. Auton Neurosci. (2011) 161:46–8. doi: 10.1016/j.autneu.2011.02.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Isaac, RO, Corrado, J, and Sivan, M. Detecting orthostatic intolerance in long COVID in a clinic setting. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2023) 20:5804. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20105804

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Vernino, S, Bourne, KM, Stiles, LE, Grubb, BP, Fedorowski, A, Stewart, JM, et al. Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS): state of the science and clinical care from a 2019 National Institutes of Health expert consensus meeting - part 1. Auton Neurosci Basic Clin. (2021) November:102828. doi: 10.1016/j.autneu.2021.102828

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Staab, JP, Eckhardt-Henn, A, Horii, A, Jacob, R, Strupp, M, Brandt, T, et al. Diagnostic criteria for persistent postural-perceptual dizziness (PPPD): consensus document of the committee for the classification of vestibular disorders of the barany society. J Vestib Res Equilib Orient. (2017) 27:191–208. doi: 10.3233/VES-170622

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Holle, D, Schulte-Steinberg, B, Wurthmann, S, Naegel, S, Ayzenberg, I, Diener, HC, et al. Persistent postural-perceptual dizziness: a matter of higher. Central Dysfunction? (2015) 10:e0142468. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142468

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Panagopoulos, D, Stranjalis, G, Gavra, M, Boviatsis, E, and Korfias, S. Shunt over-drainage, slit ventricle syndrome, programmable valves and anti-siphon devices. A narrative review of a multifactorial and intractable problem. J Integr Neurosci. (2022) 21:84. doi: 10.31083/j.jin2103084

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. D’antona, L, Craven, CL, Haq, H, Thorne, L, Matharu, S, Kassem, A, et al. A case of recurrent flight-induced cerebrospinal fluid shunt overdrainage. British J Neurosur. (2022) 37:112–5. doi: 10.1080/02688697.2022.2066629

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Barami, K . Cerebral venous overdrainage: an under-recognized complication of cerebrospinal fluid diversion. Neurosurg Focus. (2016) 41:E9. doi: 10.3171/2016.6.FOCUS16172

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Khurana, RK . Syncope and headache. Curr Pain Headache Rep. (1916) 22:1–8. doi: 10.1007/s11916-018-0706-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Cetiner, N, Seda Uyan, Z, and Celiker, A. Cardiology in the young brief report Platypnea-orthodeoxia syndrome in a child: relief of symptoms after transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale. Cardiol Young. (2021) 31:1706–8. doi: 10.1017/S1047951121001396

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Mokri, B . Orthostatic headaches in the syndrome of the trephined: resolution following Cranioplasty. Headache J Head Face Pain. (2010) 50:1206–11. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2010.01715.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Kim, JB, Kwon, DY, Park, MH, Kim, BJ, and Park, KW. Paradoxical presentation of orthostatic headache associated with increased intracranial pressure in patients with cerebral venous thrombosis. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. (2013) 16:85. doi: 10.4103/0972-2327.107705

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Chen, WT, Fuh, JL, Lu, SR, and Wang, SJ. Cerebellar hemorrhage presenting as orthostatic headache: two case reports. Neurology. (1999) 53:1887. doi: 10.1212/WNL.53.8.1887

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Hunderfund, ANL, and Mokri, B. Orthostatic headache without CSF leak. Neurology. (2008) 71:1902–6. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000336655.07617.e0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: orthostatic headache, hypermobility, cervicogenic, cervical instability, spontaneous intracranial hypotension, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome

Citation: Fermo OP (2023) Evaluation and management of orthostatic headache in hypermobility disorders. Front. Neurol. 14:1321350. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1321350

Received: 13 October 2023; Accepted: 20 November 2023;
Published: 14 December 2023.

Edited by:

Ilene Sue Ruhoy, Mount Sinai South Nassau, United States

Reviewed by:

David Kaufman, Center for Complex Diseases, United States

Copyright © 2023 Fermo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Olga P. Fermo, Fermo.olga@mayo.edu

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.