Skip to main content

CORRECTION article

Front. Neurosci., 03 March 2023
Sec. Brain Imaging Methods

Corrigendum: Smaller baseline subcortical infarct volume predicts good outcomes in patients with a large core in early acute ischemic stroke after endovascular treatment

\nYiming Gu,&#x;Yiming Gu1,2Yasuo Ding&#x;Yasuo Ding3Yu HangYu Hang1Yuezhou CaoYuezhou Cao1Zhenyu JiaZhenyu Jia1Linbo ZhaoLinbo Zhao1Ying Liu
Ying Liu4*Sheng Liu
Sheng Liu1*
  • 1Department of Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
  • 2Department of Interventional Radiology, Suzhou Municipal Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou, China
  • 3Department of Neurosurgery, Taizhou People's Hospital, Taizhou, China
  • 4Department of Neurology, Taizhou People's Hospital, Taizhou, China

A corrigendum on
Smaller baseline subcortical infarct volume predicts good outcomes in patients with a large core in early acute ischemic stroke after endovascular treatment

by Gu, Y., Ding, Y., Hang, Y., Cao, Y., Jia, Z., Zhao, L., Liu, Y., and Liu, S. (2023). Front. Neurosci. 17:1063478. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1063478

In the published article, there was an error. [References are cited in the Results section].

A correction has been made to [Results], [Paragraph 1 and 2]. This sentence previously stated:

“[1) Median baseline NIHSS score was 20 (Saposnik et al., 2008; Castonguay et al., 2014; Khalid et al., 2014; Zhang, 2014; Ernst et al., 2015, 2018; Gilgen et al., 2015; Versaci et al., 2015; Alawieh et al., 2019; Boers et al., 2019; Sarraj et al., 2020; Olivot et al., 2021; Nguyen et al., 2022).

2)The median HIR was 0.7 (0.6–0.8) and the median ASPECTS was 4 (Campbell et al., 2015; Albers et al., 2018; Demeestere et al., 2018; Nogueira et al., 2018).

3) The ASPECTS was 5 (Campbell et al., 2015; Albers et al., 2018) and 3 (Campbell et al., 2015; Albers et al., 2018; Demeestere et al., 2018; Nogueira et al., 2018) for the good and poor outcome groups, respectively (P = 0.064).]”

The corrected sentence appears below:

“[1) Median baseline NIHSS score was 20.

2) The median HIR was 0.7 (0.6–0.8) and the median ASPECTS was 4.

3) The ASPECTS was 5 and 3 for the good and poor outcome groups, respectively (P = 0.064).]”

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Keywords: acute ischemic stroke, endovascular thrombectomy, infarct volume, predictor, good outcomes

Citation: Gu Y, Ding Y, Hang Y, Cao Y, Jia Z, Zhao L, Liu Y and Liu S (2023) Corrigendum: Smaller baseline subcortical infarct volume predicts good outcomes in patients with a large core in early acute ischemic stroke after endovascular treatment. Front. Neurosci. 17:1160678. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1160678

Received: 07 February 2023; Accepted: 17 February 2023;
Published: 03 March 2023.

Edited and reviewed by: Xiangzhi Bai, Beihang University, China

Copyright © 2023 Gu, Ding, Hang, Cao, Jia, Zhao, Liu and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Ying Liu, 13952618801@163.com; Sheng Liu, liusheng@njmu.edu.cn

These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.