Molecular and cellular development of spinal cord locomotor circuitry
- Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
The spinal cord of vertebrate animals is comprised of intrinsic circuits that are capable of sensing the environment and generating complex motor behaviors. There are two major perspectives for understanding the biology of this complicated structure. The first approaches the spinal cord from the point of view of function and is based on classic and ongoing research in electrophysiology, adult behavior, and spinal cord injury. The second view considers the spinal cord from a developmental perspective and is founded mostly on gene expression and gain-of-function and loss-of-function genetic experiments. Together these studies have uncovered functional classes of neurons and their lineage relationships. In this review, we summarize our knowledge of developmental classes, with an eye toward understanding the functional roles of each group.
More than 20 distinct embryonic classes of neurons have been described in the spinal cord, and the developmental sources of their diversity have been elucidated over the past decade (Figure 1). This cellular diversity has been organized into a schema that defines major groups of neurons based on their expression of embryonic transcription factors. The major characteristics of these classes their generation, transcription factors, subsets, positions, neurotransmitters, connections, and functions are summarized here.
FIGURE 1. At around mid-gestation, progenitors exit the cell cycle and begin to take up characteristic setting positions, extend axons, and express transcription factors and neurotransmitter biosynthetic enzymes. Over the last week of development, 23 classes of neurons can be defined by transcription factor expression. Adapted from Alaynick et al. (2011).
Spinal cord development is subject to phylogenetically ancient organizing principles such as those that guide segmentation from the invertebrates, such as arthropods, to the vertebrates, such as mammals. Cellular identities in vertebrate spinal cord are specified during development along the three basic spatial axes of the embryonic body plan – rostral–caudal, dorsal–ventral, and medial–lateral. In addition, there is a temporal influence of development on these spatial coordinates such that distinct cell fates emerge at different times during development. This yields a four dimensional system for establishing spinal neuron cell fate that has been reviewed extensively (Jessell, 2000; Jankowska, 2001; Lee and Pfaff, 2001; Muroyama et al., 2002; Helms and Johnson, 2003; Goulding and Pfaff, 2005; Kiehn, 2006; Ladle et al., 2007; Stepien and Arber, 2008; Dasen and Jessell, 2009; Goulding, 2009; Grillner and Jessell, 2009; Hegarty et al., 2013).
To summarize briefly, the rostral–caudal positional identities are coordinated by opposing gradients of fibroblast growth factor (Fgf, caudalizing) and retinoic acid (RA, rostralizing; Figure 2; Muhr et al., 1999; Liu et al., 2001; Dasen et al., 2008). The dorsal–ventral axis is governed by ventralizing Sonic hedgehog (Shh) produced by the floorplate, and dorsalizing signals from the roof plate such as bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) and Wnts (which are members of the Wingless + MMTV integrants, Int family). These diffusible morphogens form gradients that activate specific transcriptional responses at defined points in the gradient (Roelink et al., 1994; Liem et al., 1995; Ericson et al., 1996; Lee et al., 1998; Megason and McMahon, 2002; Muroyama et al., 2002; Timmer et al., 2002). These transcriptional programs first specify and reinforce the identities of progenitor cells, and second, act to oppose adjacent transcriptional programs and sharpen boundaries between progenitor zones. In the ventral cord, these transcription factors are grouped into two classes, those that are inhibited by Shh (Class I) and those that are activated by Shh (Class II; Briscoe et al., 2000). Spinal cord development is also organized along a medial–lateral axis dividing progenitor cells that are located adjacent to the lumen of the neural tube, medially, whereas differentiating progeny migrate laterally. Over time, a given progenitor domain defined by these spatial coordinates may sequentially produce distinct cellular classes.
FIGURE 2. The early spinal cord (e9.5–e11) is influenced by Sonic-hedgehog (Shh) ventrally, ectoderm-derived TGF-beta family members dorsally, and retinoic acid from the somite, laterally. This establishes 13 progenitor domains (including the late born pdILA and pdILB) that express transcription factors that help to define progenitor identities and refine boundaries between progenitor domains. Ventrally, Class I transcription factors are repressed by Shh (e.g., Irx3), while Class II are induced (e.g., Olig2). Similarly, the dorsal-most domains, pd1–pd3, are dependent on TGF-beta and the pd4–pd6 and pdIL domains are independent of TGF-beta signaling. Adapted from Alaynick et al. (2011).
Within an idealized spinal cord segment, this system establishes thirteen progenitor pools along the dorsal–ventral axis (Figure 2). There are eight dorsal interneuron progenitor divisions, pd1–6 and the late-born pdILA and pdILB, four ventral interneuron progenitor divisions, p0–3, and one motor neuron progenitor domain, pMN (Alaynick et al., 2011). The identities of these domains are predominantly defined by basic-helix-loop-helix (bHLH) domain transcription factors, such as Ngn, Olig2, and Math (Bermingham et al., 2001; Gowan et al., 2001; Novitch et al., 2001; Scardigli et al., 2001; and homeodomain proteins, such as Pax3, Dbx1, and Nkx6.1 (Briscoe et al., 2000; Vallstedt et al., 2001; Subsequently, additional transcription factors, predominantly of the LIM-homeodomain family, such as Lhx1 and Isl1, are expressed in sub-groups of these domains, further refining cell fate into at least 23 distinct classes (Tsuchida et al., 1994; Gross et al., 2002; Muller et al., 2002; Thaler et al., 2002; Cheng et al., 2004).
Ventral Compartment of Distinct Progenitor Cells
The pMN cell domain gives rise to: (1) 100s of genetically distinct groups of cholinergic alpha motor neurons clustered into motor pools that innervate specific skeletal muscles; (2) gamma motor neurons that innervate intrafusal fibers of specific skeletal muscles for proprioception; (3) the predominantly thoracic (T1–12, and to L1 and L2 in some species) cholinergic preganglionic sympathetic neurons; (4) the cholinergic parasympathetic motor neurons in the sacral (S2–4) cord; and (5) oligodendrocytes found throughout the spinal cord (Figure 3). The motor neurons that effect muscle movement are primarily alpha, with fewer beta, motor neurons.
FIGURE 3. The most diverse spinal cord neuron class belongs to the motor neurons. These arise from a uniform progenitor domain before differentiating in to classes that can be grouped by columns and by motor pools. Motor pools are clusters of motor neurons that innervate a single muscle. A transcription factor code is emerging to define each of the over 200 motor pools that innervate distinct muscles. Adapted from Alaynick et al. (2011).
pMN Birth and Early Development
The recognition that a supernumerary notochord could induce the generation of additional motor neurons led to the identification of the diffusible morphogen, Shh, that induces neural precursors to a MN fate (Watterson, 1965; Roelink et al., 1994). An early marker of motor neuron development, the LIM-HD transcription factor, Isl1, indicated that motor neuron precursors are born between HH Stages 15 and 17 in chick and beginning at E9.5 (~25 somites) in mouse (Figure 4A; Ericson et al., 1992; Roelink et al., 1994; Pfaff et al., 1996; Gould et al., 2006). These progenitors will give rise to somatic alpha motor neurons that innervate skeletal muscle in the medial and lateral motor columns (LMCs), gamma motor neurons that innervate intrafusal fibers of the muscle spindles, and preganglionic motor neurons of the autonomic nervous system. Generation of each of these classes and their organization into motor columns and motor pools requires the subsequent expression of additional transcription factors (Lin et al., 1998; Dasen et al., 2005, 2008). These factors then drive the unique characteristics of that motor pool, such as guidance to the target and establishment of proper connectivity with sensory neurons and interneurons. Interestingly, this transcriptionally defined program is complemented by activity-dependent processes that control cellular connectivity and function (Hanson and Landmesser, 2004; Myers et al., 2005). In the case of gamma motor neurons, the nuclear receptor Errγ is expressed in these motor neurons and their survival is dependent on GDNF signaling (Gould et al., 2008; Friese et al., 2009; Shneider et al., 2009; Ashrafi et al., 2012).
FIGURE 4. (A–M) Simplified schematic illustrations of development of MNs and ventral/dorsal subclass interneurons with important transcriptional factors.
The motor neuron progenitor domain is ventral to the Irx3 expressing p2 domain that delimits Olig2 expression and is dorsal to the p3 domain that expresses Nkx2.2 and Nkx2.9 to delimit Pax6 expression. The expression of Nkx6.1 and Nkx6.2 acts to limit transcription factor expression to Olig2, that in turn drives the expression of MN transcription factors Hb9 (Mnr2 in chick), and Ngn2 (Briscoe et al., 2000; Sander et al., 2000; Vallstedt et al., 2001; Shirasaki and Pfaff, 2002). Hb9, expressed during the final cell division of pMNs, is sufficient to drive the expression of Isl1, Isl2, Lhx3, and ChAT—as well as its own expression—establishing pMN independence from Shh (Tanabe et al., 1998). Like Mnr2, the HD transcription factor, Hb9, can induce the formation of motor neurons when ectopically expressed. Loss of Hb9 in mouse, however, results in ectopic upregulation of a V2 IN marker gene, Chx10, but does not result in complete loss of motor neurons or of fictive locomotion (Arber et al., 1999; Thaler et al., 1999; Alaynick, Pfaff unpublished observations).
Motor Neuron Subtypes
The Medial and Hypaxial Motor Columns (MMC and HMC)
The medial sub-group of motor neurons innervates axial musculature and is found the length of the spinal cord. There are two divisions of this group, the medial motor column (MMC) and the hypaxial motor column (HMC or MMCl). Both express Isl1 and Isl2, although the ratio of expression varies, with greater Isl1 expression in the HMC than MMC at E11.5 and greater Isl2 in the MMC than HMC by E13.5 in mouse (Tsuchida et al., 1994; Thaler et al., 2004). The MMC innervates dorsal or epaxial musculature, while HMC innervates ventral or hypaxial musculature. Initially all motor neuron progenitors express the LIM homeodomain transcription factor, Lhx3. Lhx3 expression is maintained in the MMC while Lhx3 expression is downregulated in the HMC and LMC (Tsuchida et al., 1994). Motor neuron (Hb9 promoter) dependent expression of Lhx3 results in conversion of LMC motor neurons to a MMC identity (Sharma et al., 2000).
The Lateral Motor Column (LMC)
At limb levels, the 50 or so muscles of the limb are innervated by motor neurons occupying a lateral motor column (Landmesser, 1978). Neurons of the lateral portion of the LMC (LMCl) are later born than the MMC motor neurons, and like the cortex, migrate in an inside-out arrangement such that LMC neurons are born in the proliferative ventricular zone of the pMN domain and then migrate through the MMC to form the LMC. While initially expressing Lhx3, a hallmark of MMC identity, these motor neurons down-regulate Lhx3 by an unknown mechanism and begin to express transcription factors not found in MMC that are definitive for LMC identity. The factors include Foxp1, Lim1, and the enzyme Raldh2 (Sharma et al., 1998, 2000; Sockanathan and Jessell, 1998). The lateral motor column has lateral (LMCl) and medial (LMCm) divisions that innervate the dorsal and ventral portions of the limb, respectively, and these cell fates are partially regulated by RA signaling (Sockanathan et al., 2003; Ji et al., 2006). In the LMCl, Lim1 and Hb9 are expressed while Isl1 is downregulated. In the LMCm, there is low Hb9 and maintained Isl1 expression. The LMCm and LMCl both express Isl2, which is downregulated in the MMC and HMC (Misra et al., 2009). The LMCm and LMCl are further subdivided into motor pools, each innervating a specific muscle of the limb. These individual motor pools are defined by their expression of Ets and Nkx transcription factors that constitute a more refined transcriptional code (De Marco Garcia and Jessell, 2008).
The rostro-caudal regions of the LMC appear to be determined in part by homeobox (Hox) genes. Hox6 is characteristic of brachial level, Hox9 of thoracic and Hox10 of lumbar. Disruption of the Hox genes in mouse or chick has shown that these boundaries can be profoundly altered to create an expansion of lateral motor columns into thoracic regions (Jung et al., 2010). More strikingly, loss of the Hox co-factor Foxp1 disrupts the ability of motor neurons to incorporate the homeobox code for spatial information, and results in a loss of defined motor pools in the LMC (Dasen et al., 2008).
Preganglionic Motor Neurons (PGC)
Preganglionic motor neurons of the sympathetic nervous system are the most dorsal motor neurons and can be identified by their expression of ChAT, NADPH Diaphorase, and some members of the one-cut transcription factor class (Francius and Clotman, 2010). Preganglionic motor neurons are also dependent on the downregulation of Lhx3 and are lost with continued, Hb9-dependent expression of Lhx3 in all motor neurons, or loss of Foxp1 or Isl2 (Sharma et al., 2000; Thaler et al., 2004; Dasen et al., 2005, 2008).
A great deal has been learned about the development of discrete classes of interneurons by describing them by electrophysiology, behavioral output, and by expression of proteins involved in transcription, neurotransmitter signaling, and intracellular signaling. Currently, this schema has defined over 20 interneuron types in the spinal cord. While one can argue that every neuron has a unique molecular/genetic expression profile, dendritic arborization and axonal projection pattern, this grouping schema has been useful in organizing interneurons into functionally related groups.
Historically, two broad groups have been defined: the “V” interneurons with progenitors that are found in the ventral cord and are grossly associated with motor function, and a dorsal Interneuron, dI class, associated predominantly with sensory processing. Most studies have examined development within a single or a few segments. A recent study examined rostro-caudal differences at one time point, e12.5 (Francius et al., 2013). This showed that subclasses of ventral interneurons (V0, V1, V2, and V3) exhibit distinct organizational patterns at brachial, thoracic and lumbar levels of the developing spinal cord. Furthermore, each cardinal “V”’ class of ventral interneurons can be subdivided into several subsets according to further combinatorial expression of transcription factors (Francius et al., 2013). Given these caveats that likely apply to other interneuron classes, the V and dI interneuron classifications are a simplification with exceptions, some of which are listed below. Despite these limitations, the V and dI schema is a useful approach to the subject.
V0 Interneuron Characteristics
Local projecting V0 neurons are a population of primarily contralateral, with some ipsilateral projecting neurons with inhibitory or excitatory identity that send axons 2–4 spinal segments rostrally (Moran-Rivard et al., 2001; Pierani et al., 2001). They receive inputs from ipsilaterally projecting Chx10+ glutamatergic V2a interneurons (Crone et al., 2008; Figure 5). They are the dorsal-most ventral progenitor pool and are characterized by their expression of the Dbx (developing brain homeobox) homeodomain transcription factor, Evx1/2 (even-skipped homeobox 1; Figure 4B). Dbx1 and Dbx2 are expressed in dividing cells, although Dbx1 may be briefly expressed in post-mitotic cells (see V1 discussion Pierani et al., 1999). Four V0 interneuron subclasses have been described to date: V0V, V0D, V0C, and V0G (Pierani et al., 1999, 2001; Moran-Rivard et al., 2001; Lanuza et al., 2004; Zagoraiou et al., 2009). Early studies addressed the V0 class by eliminating Dbx1 and showing that the Evx1+ V0V subclass was lost because these neurons become fated to an En1+ V1-like subclass and astrocytes (Pierani et al., 2001; Lanuza et al., 2004). Because Dbx1 is transiently expressed, a Dbx1LacZ knock-in allele was used to show that with loss of Dbx1, E18.5 embryos retained 40% of the βgal+ cells and resulted in a 25% expansion in the number of Lbx1+ Pax2+ dl6-like commissural neurons (Lanuza et al., 2004). By perinatal time points, genetic strategies to track Dbx1+ cells using βgal find that most of these cells are neural by expression of NeuN and are found in lamina VIII where commissural interneurons reside. Lineage labeling of Dbx1-derived cell reveals a large abundance of glia (Lanuza et al., 2004). Moreover, the Dbx1 lineage includes many dorsal horn neurons as this transcription factor is also expressed in dorsal domains. Loss of Dbx1 results in loss of V0D and V0V subclasses, whereas loss of Evx1 results in a loss of only the V0V subclass (Moran-Rivard et al., 2001; Pierani et al., 2001; Lanuza et al., 2004). V0 and V1 classes both express Lhx1 and Lhx5, markers of inhibitory spinal interneurons (Pillai et al., 2007).
FIGURE 5. The motor circuitry is shown in diagrammatic form in the lower panel. Here, neurons can be divided by projection patterns, that are ipsilateral, contralateral, or both. Three classes of neurotransmitter are found in the cord: excitatory glutamatergic (e.g., V2a), inhibitory GABAergic/glycinergic (e.g., V2b), and excitatory cholinergic neurons (e.g., motor neurons). Roles for neurons in defining rate (e.g., V1), left–right alternation (e.g., V0) and rhythmicity (e.g., V3), are emerging. Adapted from Alaynick et al. (2011).
V0 Birth and Early Development
In mouse, the majority of Dbx1+ progenitors appear between E10 and E13 and give rise to V0D and V0V commissural interneurons (Moran-Rivard et al., 2001; Pierani et al., 2001; Lanuza et al., 2004). Dbx1/2 expression is found in the rostral CNS at stage 13 in chick and more caudally by stage 15 (Pierani et al., 1999). Evx1/2 positive V0 cells are generated at stages 17 and 18 and appear in the ventral domain of Dbx1 and Dbx2 expression (Pierani et al., 1999). Ventral Evx1/2 expressing V0 neurons appear at stages 17–18 within the ventral expression domain of Dbx1 and Dbx2, and then migrate ventrally (Pierani et al., 1999). The V0 class appears from a Pax6+, Dbx1/2+, Pax3/7- domain that is the dorsal-most ventral progenitor domain (Pierani et al., 1999).
V0 Interneuron Subtypes
The primarily inhibitory V0V class is distinguished by transient expression of the homeodomain transcription factor, Evx1. These cells arise from the ventral portion of the Dbx1+ progenitor domain, and like all post-mitotic cells arising from Dbx1+ progenitors, they share a similar post-mitotic migration and commissural axon pattern (Moran-Rivard et al., 2001; Pierani et al., 2001). The V0V interneurons are implicated in locomotion as indicated by increased c-fos immunoreactivity following fictive locomotion (Lanuza et al., 2004). However, Evx1 knockout mice have grossly normal locomotion patterns despite a ~70% reduction in the V0V interneurons and loss of appropriate contralateral intersegmental axonal projections in the remaining ~30% of interneurons (Moran-Rivard et al., 2001). A subset of the V0V class has been reported to be excitatory in an unpublished observation (Zhang et al., 2008).
Unlike the V0V subclass, the more dorsal Dbx1+ progenitors of the glycinergic/GABAergic V0D class do not express Evx1 (Pierani et al., 2001; Lanuza et al., 2004). And while both V0D and V0V classes have similar axon guidance and cell body position, the loss of the V0D class, in conjunction with V0V class, does appear to alter locomotor behavior. When Dbx1 is knocked out, eliminating all V0 progenitors, a disruption of left–right coordination is observed at lumbar levels L2 and L5. These periods of left–right synchrony are intermittent and periods of normal left–right alternation are observed amidst episodes of synchrony (Lanuza et al., 2004). No disruption of flexor-extensor behavior, as indicated by alternating phasic activity of the L2 and L5 segments, was observed in a drug-induced isolated cord fictive locomotion assay (Lanuza et al., 2004). Recently, studies have showed that a cluster of V0D cells lateral to the central canal receive substantial input from primary afferents and preferentially project axons toward contralateral motoneurons via an oligosynaptic pathway, and are active during fictive locomotion. This suggests that this subset of V0 interneurons may be primarily responsible for coordination of left–right alternation during locomotion (Griener et al., 2015).
V0C and V0G
The V0C and V0G subclass represent ~5% of V0 progenitors and are identified by expression of Pitx2 and occupy a medial position dorsal to the central canal (Zagoraiou et al., 2009). These cells were first observed in lumbar levels at E11.5–12.0 by Pitx2 immunoreactivity which, unlike many embryonic markers, could be detected until postnatal day 30 (Zagoraiou et al., 2009). Neurotransmitter markers can subdivide the Pitx2+ cells into cholinergic (vAChT+ and ChAT+) and glutamatergic (vGluT2+) types that are distinct (Zagoraiou et al., 2009). While these are found at cervical and lumbar levels, within the lumbar cord, these two types are distributed in a gradient such that a greater number of cholinergic interneurons are found at more rostral levels and a greater number of glutamatergic interneurons at more caudal levels (Zagoraiou et al., 2009). The cholinergic cells are distinct from Pitx2- cholinergic C3 propriospinal interneurons (Zagoraiou et al., 2009). By genetic tracing, ~80% of these neurons were determined to be from a Dbx1+ progenitor domain at E12.5 and loss of Dbx1 eliminated the Pitx2 immunoreactivity in the intermediate cord. Because V0C and V0G Pitx2+ cells transiently express Evx1, they appear to be subsets of the V0V class. This relatively small ipsilaterally and bilaterally projecting class, however, is responsible for perhaps all c-boutons on motor neurons found in P8 to P25 mice (Zagoraiou et al., 2009; Stepien et al., 2010). These interneurons provide relatively weak innervation to Sox14::eGFP+ V2a and calbindin+ V1 Renshaw cells. These cells appear to be involved in local circuitry as corticospinal and sensory vGluT1+ glutamatergic boutons were not found, whereas serotonergic and GAD67+ GABAergic boutons were observed (Zagoraiou et al., 2009). While previous experiments did not find a gross locomotor behavioral defect with loss of the V0V subclass in Evx1 mutant animals, Pitx2 mutant animals were found to have defects in locomotion revealed by EMG recordings during swimming (Zagoraiou et al., 2009). This deficit was argued to represent an abnormal integration of sensory inputs. It may, alternatively or in addition, represent a deficit in C-terminal modulation of motor neuron excitability. A survey in E12.5 mice showed that several V0 subclasses can be defined by expression of Pax2, Pax6, Evx1, Ptx2, Nurr1, HNF-6, BhlhB5, and Prdm8 (Francius et al., 2013).
V1 Interneuron Characteristics
As a population, this group appears to control burst durations and is comprised of cells physiologists defined as Ia inhibitory and Renshaw cells. Mice models without V1 and V2b showed significant difficulty with limb articulation in flexion and extension (Zhang et al., 2014). The pV1 progenitor domain gives rise to important inhibitory subclasses of neurons that were previously described electrophysiologically: the Ia inhibitory interneurons that mediate reciprocal inhibition and the Renshaw cells that mediate inhibitory feedback to integrate limb and muscle length information into spinal circuitry. Renshaw cells and Ia inhibitory interneurons are V1 derived, but differ in morphology, location, calcium-binding protein expression, synaptic connectivity, and function. These differences are already present in neonates and their differentiation starts in the early embryo (Benito-Gonzalez and Alvarez, 2012). In addition, 75% of V1 interneurons are non-Ia, non-Renshaw subclasses that await characterization (Sapir et al., 2004; Alvarez et al., 2005). Short-range ipsilaterally and rostrally projecting glycinergic/GABAergic V1 neurons are characterized by transient expression of homeodomain transcription factor En1 (Figure 4C; Burrill et al., 1997; Matise and Joyner, 1997; Pierani et al., 1999, 2001; Saueressig et al., 1999). Studies in embryonic chick indicate that these neurons project for only 1–2 segments and have been shown to make inhibitory contacts onto motor neurons and other interneurons, although this may not be the case in the mature mouse (Wenner et al., 1998, 2000). Loss of Pax6 or En1-dependent DTA ablation eliminates the recurrent inhibition by Renshaw cells on motor neurons (Sapir et al., 2004; Gosgnach et al., 2006). Elimination of V1 interneurons results in a marked slowing on the drug-induced fictive locomotion period that is seen in conventional knockouts, targeted ablation, and acute inhibition with allatostatin (Gosgnach et al., 2006; Goulding, 2009). The mechanism by which elimination of an inhibitory class would prolong the locomotor cycle remains unknown and may result from the loss of inhibitory neurons to terminate MN firing. The V1 class, like V0, expresses the inhibitory spinal interneuron markers Lhx1 and Lhx5 (Pillai et al., 2007).
V1 Birth and Early Development
Unlike cells in the dorsal-most p0 domain that expresses Dbx1 and Dbx2, the adjacent p1 domain only expresses Dbx2 (Pierani et al., 1999). The V1 class appears from a Pax6+, Dbx2+, Nkx6.2+, Dbx1- domain that is ventral to the Dbx1/2+ V0 domain (Matise and Joyner, 1997; Pierani et al., 1999). In chick, En1+, Lim1/2+ V1 neurons appear at stage 17, and most appear ventral to the domain of Dbx1 expression, within the ventral domain of these Dbx2+, Dbx1- progenitors (Pierani et al., 1999). Dbx expression does not overlap with En1, perhaps due to the relatively late expression of En1 (Pierani et al., 1999). Genetic tracing studies using Dbx1nlsLacZ mice between ages E10 and E16.5 found that ~5–10% of En1+ cells did express a low level of βgal, perhaps a reflection of transient Dbx1 expression and more enduring βgal protein. The V1 class is marked by expression of Foxd3, found in the dI2 domain, as well (Ramos et al., 2010). The transcription factor, Bhlhb5, which marks the V1, V2 and dI6 domains, is required at least partially for V1 identity assessed by En1 expression (Ramos et al., 2010; Skaggs et al., 2011). Expression of Bhlhb5 in conjunction with Ngn2 facilitates V1 identity ectopically (Skaggs et al., 2011).
V1 Interneuron Subtypes
Renshaw cells use both glycine and GABA as neurotransmitters, transiently express Gad65 early in embryonic development and have both motor neurons and Ia interneurons as targets (Saueressig et al., 1999; Sapir et al., 2004). They also express calbindin D28K embryonically and continue to express this marker into adulthood (Alvarez et al., 1999; Geiman et al., 2000). They receive input from motor neuron collaterals that release acetylcholine, glutamate, and aspartate (Mentis et al., 2005; Richards et al., 2014). Renshaw cells modulate proprioceptive sensory input and motor neuron output. Genetic tracing studies showed that Renshaw cells are derived from an En1+ progenitor pool and, although they are not lost in the absence of En1, they do have fewer motor neuron recurrent inputs (Sapir et al., 2004). They are, however, lost in the absence of Pax6 (Sapir et al., 2004). Recent study showed that selective activation of the Onecut transcription factors Oc1 and Oc2 during the first wave of V1 interneuron neurogenesis is a key step in the Renshaw cell differentiation; furthermore Renshaw cell development is dependent on the forkhead transcription factor Foxd3, which is more broadly expressed in post-mitotic V1 interneurons (Stam et al., 2012).
V1 Ia Interneuron
Although Ia interneurons have been rediscovered as a V1 subclass, like Renshaw cells, the Ia INs were functionally described before the advent of molecular genetic dissection of interneuron development (Eccles et al., 1954; Hultborn et al., 1971; Hultborn and Udo, 1972) These inhibitory glycinergic cells receive input from muscle spindle Ia proprioceptive afferents carrying muscle length information and provide inhibitory input onto motor neurons innervating antagonist muscles. Like motor neurons, Ia receive inhibitory inputs from Renshaw cells (Hultborn et al., 1971). In neonatal mice, disynaptic glycinergic reciprocal inhibition is mediated by Ia interneurons, although this activity is preserved in the absence of Pax6, indicating that cells of more than one origin contributes to this functional class (Wang et al., 2008). Only when V1 and V2b are both ablated is reciprocal inhibition profoundly altered. Renshaw cells constitute 8–19% of V1 interneurons and the Foxp2+ (by immunohistochemistry) population accounts for around 33% of these neurons at P0 and 50% at E13 (Morikawa et al., 2009). Because there are no universal markers of Ia interneurons, all Ia interneurons cannot be accounted for, leaving the physiologic properties and connectivity patterns of V1 interneurons unaccounted for (Alvarez et al., 2005). Of note, some interneurons with synaptic organization like Ia interneurons have been found that arise from the V1 population and are Foxp2 positive (Morikawa et al., 2009). A survey in E12.5 mice showed that several V1 subclasses can be defined by expression of Calbindin, OC1, OC2, OC3, Foxd3, En1, MafB, FoxP2, Foxd3, Foxp4, Pax2, Arx, Evx1, Nurr1, BhlhB5, Pou4F1, Pou3F1, and Prdm8 (Francius et al., 2013).
V2 Interneuron Characteristics
V2 interneurons become divided into V2a and V2b classes of ipsilaterally projecting interneurons that extend axons caudally across several segments (Goulding, 2009). The excitatory V2a class is glutamatergic and expresses Chx10, while the Gata2/3+ V2b class is inhibitory and uses both glycine and GABA (Figure 4D; Al-Mosawie et al., 2007; Lundfald et al., 2007). The transcription factor, Bhlhb5, marks the V2, as well as V1 and dI6 domains (Ramos et al., 2010).
V2 Birth and Early Development (Notch-Delta)
V2 interneurons arise from a progenitor pool just dorsal to the pMN domain and share expression of Lhx3 with the pMN domain. In addition, both domains share expression of NLI that forms homodimers. This NLI homodimer nucleates the formation of a higher-order tetramer with Lhx3 in the V2 progenitor domain, and in the case of pMNs this V2-defining tetramer (Lhx3-NLI-NLI-Lhx3) is disrupted by the insertion of Isl1 to form a hexamer (Lhx3-Isl1-NLI-NLI-Isl1-Lhx3). Transcriptional response elements that are active in V2 cells can bind both the motor neuron hexamers and the V2 associated tetramers, while response elements active in motor neurons are only responsive to the hexamers (Lee et al., 2008). Later the V2 domain expresses Chx10 that acts as a repressor of motor neuron associated hexamers in V2 progenitors, leaving only the LIM tetramers active (Sander et al., 2000; Lee et al., 2008). The progenitor pool of V2 neurons becomes post-mitotically segregated into V2a and V2b neurons.
Time-lapse imaging in zebrafish showed that the majority of V2 progenitors give rise to a pair of V2a and V2b cells (Kimura et al., 2008), indicating that V2a and V2b arise from the same progenitor. This segregation into V2a and V2b is mediated by Notch/delta signaling in zebrafish and mouse models (Yang et al., 2006; Del Barrio et al., 2007; Peng et al., 2007). In mouse, Delta4, but not Delta 1, activates this signaling cascade and is downstream of Foxn4, which also induces expression of Mash1/Ascl1 (Del Barrio et al., 2007; Peng et al., 2007). Mind bomb-1 (Mib1) is an E3 ubiquitin ligase that ubiquitinates and promotes the endocytosis of Notch ligands. In mice model, Mib1 plays an important role in Notch activity and specific differentiation, neurogenesis and gliogenesis of V2 interneurons. Mice models with abnormal Mib1 resulted in unclear spinal progenitors, premature or unbalanced differentiation or loss of astrocytes and oligodendrocytes (Kang et al., 2013). In zebrafish embryos two ligands, DeltaA and DeltaD, and three receptors, Notch1a, Notch1b, and Notch3 redundantly contribute to p2 progenitor maintenance; on the other hand, DeltaA, DeltaC, and Notch1a mainly contribute to the V2a/V2b cell fate determination (Okigawa et al., 2014). Misra et al. (2009) showed Foxn4 and proneural factors may serve as the trigger to initiate asymmetric Dll4-Notch and subsequent BMP/TGFβ signaling events required for neuronal diversity in the V2 domain (Okigawa et al., 2014). V2b fate is specified by active Notch1, Foxn4, Mash1, and Scl Notch-binding protein MAML is also required for this specification (Peng et al., 2007). Lack of active Notch1 results in V2a fate, shown in an increase of V2a interneurons at the expense of V2b in Psn1 KO mice or Notch1 KO mice (Del Barrio et al., 2007; Peng et al., 2007). Transcription factor Gata2 is necessary in the normal development of V2a and V2b neurons and Gata2 promotes the selective activation of V2b at the expense of V2a fate (Francius et al., 2014). Progenitors that express the notch ligand, Delta-like 4 generate almost all V2a and V2c neurons while producing only a small fraction of neurons of other subtypes along the dorsoventral axis (Zou et al., 2015).
V2 Interneuron Subtypes
The V2a class of ipsilaterally projecting interneurons expresses the transcription factors Chx10 and Sox14 and is glutamatergic. These interneurons are composed of cells with diverse firing properties and morphologies with local as well as long-range ipsilateral projection patterns (Dougherty and Kiehn, 2010a,b; Zhong et al., 2010). This class of interneurons has been shown to contact motor neurons (Al-Mosawie et al., 2007; Stepien et al., 2010) and contralaterally projecting V0 interneurons (Crone et al., 2008). Loss of these cells has been shown to disturb locomotor function in a state-dependent manner (Crone et al., 2008, 2009; Dougherty and Kiehn, 2010a,b; Zhong et al., 2010). In a series of in vitro experiments it was found that Chx10-DTA V2a-ablated mice displayed more variable amplitude and period than wild-type controls during drug-induced fictive locomotion. Further, these mutant animals had incoherent left–right alternation during drug-induced fictive locomotion. Surprisingly, these animals failed to display coordinated brainstem stimulated or dorsal root stimulated fictive locomotion, suggesting that Chx10+ cells mediate descending and sensory activation of locomotor activity (Crone et al., 2008).
A subsequent study, using a different strain of mice that avoided the neonatal lethality seen in previous work, showed that during treadmill running, Chx10-DTA mice can transition from alternating locomotion to synchronous hindlimb locomotion at higher speeds. High-speed synchronous left–right activity, or galloping, is not normally seen in mice, although it has been described in studies of Eph and ephrin signaling molecule mutant mice (Dottori et al., 1998; Kullander et al., 2001; Yokoyama et al., 2001). The Eph/ephrin mutant mice, however, have synchronous activity at both slow and fast speeds. Some V2a interneurons express EphA4, but a compelling correlation has yet to be discovered (Lundfald et al., 2007). In zebrafish, alx, a zebrafish homolog of Chx10, is expressed in an ipsilateral descending excitatory interneuron population named CiD (circumferential descending) neurons that monosynaptically contact motor neurons (Kimura et al., 2006; McLean et al., 2008). This population has been shown to be active during high-frequency swimming in larval zebrafish (McLean et al., 2008). Within this interneuron class, dorsally located cells are recruited at a high swimming frequency. As the frequency decreases, more ventral cells are recruited, accompanied by silencing of previously active dorsal cells (McLean et al., 2008). A survey in E12.5 mice showed that V2a subclasses can be defined by expression of BhlhB5, Pou3F1, OC1, OC2, OC3, Prdm8, MafA, and cMaf (Francius et al., 2013).
Ipsilaterally projecting V2b interneurons express Gata2/3, are inhibitory GABAergic neurons, and appear to make direct connections onto motor neurons (Lundfald et al., 2007; Peng et al., 2007). Observations by the Goulding lab indicate they project caudally (Zhang et al., 2014). These cells may underlie the retained reciprocal inhibitory pathways seen in V1 knockout mice (Wang et al., 2008). A survey in E12.5 mice showed that V2b subclasses can be defined by expression of BhlhB5, Pou3F1, OC1, OC2, OC3, Prdm8, MafA, and MafB (Francius et al., 2013). As pointed out earlier, V1- and V2b-derived neurons function as the core interneuronal components of the limb central pattern generator (CPG) that coordinate flexor-extensor motor activity (Zhang et al., 2014).
The V2 interneuron class has recently been shown to further diverge to a Sox1-expressing Gata3-negative population named V2c interneurons, function of which is still yet to be elucidated (Li et al., 2010; Panayi et al., 2010). A survey in E12.5 mice showed that V2c subclasses can be defined by expression of Sox1, OC1, OC2, and OC3 (Francius et al., 2013).
V3 Interneuron Characteristics
The Sim1+ VGluT2+ glutamatergic V3 interneurons send projections predominantly contralaterally and caudally (Goulding, 2009). Genetic tracing, using a Sim1-eGFP or Sim1Cre and reporter lines, and viral tracing, using pseudorabies, shows that 80–85% of these cells project contralaterally and a minor proportion remain ipsilateral or project both contra- and ipsilaterally (Zhang et al., 2008). As a population, Sim1+ V3 interneurons form 24% of glutamatergic connections on V1 Ia, 27% on Renshaw subclasses, 22% of glutamatergic synapses on lateral motor column motor neurons, as well as connections on Lhx3+ V2 interneurons, and lamina VIII commissural interneurons (Zhang et al., 2008). Behaviorally, loss of V3 neuronal activity by genetic attenuation with tetanus toxin or allatostatin signaling resulted in a loss of CPG robustness. In isolated cord fictive locomotion, both dorsal root stimulation and drug-induced methods produced weak CPG activity in only some of the cords examined. The outputs were less consistent and had greater coefficients of variance. Although both right and left sides of the cord produced irregular outputs, the fidelity of left–right coordination was preserved suggesting that V3 interneurons do not regulate the coordination of left–right activity. In adult Sim1Cre AlstR192 animals, application of allatostatin to the cord produced locomotor disturbances in gait, as well (Zhang et al., 2008). In Sim1 mutant mice, V3 interneurons are produced normally and maintain in the similar position and organizations as wild-type; however, there is significant reduction of interneurons in dorsal subgroup and there is significant reduction in the contralateral axonal projection. Therefore, Sim1 appears to be critical in migration and axonal projection of V3 interneuronal development (Blacklaws et al., 2015). Mice that are mutant for Nkx2.2 and Nkx2.9 lose V3 interneurons and Nkx2.2+/- Nkx-/- mice display intermittent or permanent hopping gait (Holz et al., 2010). Holz et al. (2010) indicate that this mutation affects floor plate, and therefore likely affects commissural interneuron projections that mediate left–right coordination. A survey in E12.5 mice showed that V2c subclasses can be defined by expression of Olig3, Prox1, BhlhB5, and Nurr1 (Francius et al., 2013).
V3 Birth and Early Development
These V3 interneurons arise from the ventral-most p3 progenitor domain defined by homeobox transcription factors Nkx2.2 and Nkx2.9 and the PAS-bHLH transcription factor Sim1 (simple-minded homolog 1; Figure 4E; Briscoe et al., 1999; Goulding et al., 2002). Genetic tracing techniques using a Sim1TauLacZ knock-in reporter mouse or Sim1Cre and reporter lines (R26floxstop-GAP43-GFP and R26floxstop-lacZ) have shown similar expression at E11.5 to in situ hybridization data for Sim1 expression that appeared just lateral to the Nkx2.2 progenitors (Marion et al., 2005; Zhang et al., 2008). Nkx2.2 also regulates the expression of Olig3 in V3 neurons. While Olig3 plays a key role in respecification of dl2 and dl3 neurons into dl4 interneurons in dorsal spinal cord (see below), it does not appear to affect the generation and migration of the ventral neurons (Liu et al., 2014).
V3D and V3V
Each class of interneurons can likely be further subdivided. The existence of V3 subtype heterogeneity defined by cell body positions was first reported in a review of locomotor circuitry by the Goulding group (Goulding, 2009). This group recently examined both electrophysiological and morphological properties of mature V3 interneurons in adult mouse and were able to identify two V3 subpopulations with distinct intrinsic properties and distributions (ventral and dorsal), as well as an important intermediate subgroup (Borowska et al., 2013). They reported V3V, primarily located in lamina VIII, possessed a few branching processes and were capable of generating rapid tonic firing spikes and V3D had a more complex morphology with relatively slow average spike frequency with strong adaptation (Borowska et al., 2013). A survey in E12.5 mice showed that V3V express Olig3, Prox1, BhlhB5, and Nurr1, and V3D can be defined by expression of OC1, OC2, and OC3 (Francius et al., 2013).
A group of glutamatergic, rhythmically active interneurons with possible connections to motor neurons can be found along either side of the ventral midline in thoracic and upper lumbar segments (Thaler et al., 1999; Wichterle et al., 2002; Hinckley et al., 2005; Wilson et al., 2005). These Hb9+ and VGluT2+ interneurons are found in lamina VIII, although the developmental origin of these cells is unknown (Figure 4F). These cells have oscillatory behavior, make potential contacts with motor neurons, and are associated with motor rhythms (Hinckley et al., 2005; Wilson et al., 2005; Hinckley and Ziskind-Conhaim, 2006). These interneurons were the first to show oscillatory properties and efforts have been made to discover a relationship to rhythm generation or a pacemaker property for the CPG (Kwan et al., 2009). No cell class, however, has been found to act as a pacemaker for CPG activity. Remaining questions for the VX include: what is the progenitor domain that gives rise to the VX domain; and why are they not found below the L2 segment at E18.5.
Dorsal Interneuron Progenitors
There are eight canonical classes of dorsal progenitors, dI1–6 and dILA and dILB. Of these, the dorsal-most dI1–3 progenitors are dependent on signals from the roof plate and termed Class A (Liem et al., 1997; Lee et al., 2000). The remaining dI4–6 and dILA and dILB are independent of roof plate signals and termed Class B (Gross et al., 2002; Muller et al., 2002). The dorsal-most progenitors, pd1–pd3, are born between days E9.5 and 10.5 and become post-mitotic and begin to migrate ventrally between E10.5 and E11.5 (Helms and Johnson, 1998; Bermingham et al., 2001; Gross et al., 2002; Muller et al., 2002). These cells will eventually form the deeper layers of the dorsal horn. The more ventral Class B dI4–6 cells are born between E10 and 12.5 and then post-mitotically express Lbx1 and migrate either dorsally to form the more superficial layers of the dorsal horn or migrate ventrally to the deep dorsal horn and the ventral spinal cord (Gross et al., 2002; Muller et al., 2002). The later born dILA and dILB classes are born between E11 and E13 and are inter-mixed with each other. They then migrate dorsally and constitute a significant portion of the cells in the superficial dorsal horn, including the substantia gelatinosa (Nornes and Carry, 1978; Gross et al., 2002; Muller et al., 2002; Mizuguchi et al., 2006). As with the ventral interneuron classes, each of these classes, or their subgroups, has characteristic features. For instance, each interneuron subclass appears to have a unique axonal projection that produces a tight fascicle within white matter tracts (Avraham et al., 2009, 2010).
dI1 Interneuron Characteristics
The dorsal-most progenitor domain pd1 expresses the bHLH transcription factor Math1+ (Mouse atonal homolog 1, also known as Atoh1) and gives rise to at least two VGluT2+ glutamatergic subclasses: dI1A and dI1B, characterized by Lim-HD expression and their spinocerebellar tract (SCT) contributions (Figure 4G). Recent study shows that Msx1 and Msx2, two homeodomain transcription factors that are induced earlier than bHLH transcription factors, likely play a role as transcriptional activators of Math1/Atoh1 in spinal cord development (Duval et al., 2014). The dI1A (also known as dI1comm) neurons express the Lim-HD transcription factors Lhx2high and Lhx9low, while dI1B (also known as dI1ipsi) express the Lim-HD TF Lhx9 (Helms and Johnson, 1998; Lee et al., 1998; Bermingham et al., 2001; Gowan et al., 2001; Wilson et al., 2008; Avraham et al., 2009). The dI1 interneurons migrate to the deep dorsal horn and intermediate gray where they receive proprioceptive input from the periphery and form commissural projections of dorsal and ventral SCTs (Helms and Johnson, 1998; Bermingham et al., 2001). Using an Atoh1LacZ allele to trace the fate of pd1 progenitors in developing mouse, at least two subsets of the dI1 class have been identified: (1) a medial cluster of vertically oriented neurons that are Cbln2+ and Smarca2+ and projects to the SCT in the contralateral (Tag1+) lateral funiculus; (2) a more lateral Sox6+, cluster of horizontally oriented neurons that contributes to the SCT in the ipsilateral lateral funiculus (Miesegaes et al., 2009). In chick, data with an enhancer that labels these cells suggests that both fascicles coalesce in the lateral funiculus ventral to the fascicle formed by the dI2 projections (Avraham et al., 2009).
dI1 Birth and Early Development
The roof-plate-dependent Class A dp1 progenitors of the dI1 class express the bHLH transcription factors Olig3 and Math1 (Muller et al., 2005; Gowan et al., 2001). The dI1 neurons in mouse are born between E10 and E12.5 and express Lhx2/9, Barhl1 (bar homeobox like 1) and Brn3a (Pou4f1, a class IV POU domain-containing transcription factor; Helms and Johnson, 1998). Loss of function experiments with BMP7 in chick and Bmp7 mutant mice results in loss of dI1, dI3, and dI5 (Le Dréau et al., 2012).
dI2 Interneuron Characteristics
dI2 interneurons are ascending, contralaterally projecting, relay interneurons that migrate to the intermediate spinal cord and ventral horn (Gowan et al., 2001; Gross et al., 2002). These interneurons have been suggested to convey sensory information via the spinothalamic tract to the thalamus, based on their location (Figure 4E; Brown, 1981; Tracey, 1985; Gross et al., 2002). The projections likely occupy the lateral funiculus and are dorsal to the dI1 fascicle, as analyzed by enhancer expression in chick (Avraham et al., 2009). Arising from bHLH transcription factor Ngn1 (neurogenin 1) and Ngn2 expressing progenitors, these neurons express LIM-HD transcription factors Lhx1, Lhx5 and winged-helix domain Foxd3 (forkhead homeobox D3) post-mitotically (Bermingham et al., 2001; Gowan et al., 2001; Gross et al., 2002). These interneurons were previously known as D3A interneurons.
dI2 Birth and Early Development
The roof-plate-dependent Class A dI2 progenitor domain, pd2, is characterized by the expression of the bHLH transcription factors, Olig3, Ngn1, and Ngn2 and are born between E10- and E12.5 (Figure 4H; Gowan et al., 2001; Muller et al., 2005). Two SoxD transcription factors, Sox5 and Sox6, are expressed in restricted domains of dorsal progenitors. Sox5 controls cell fate specification of dp2 and dp3 progenitors and, as a result, controls the correct number of the corresponding dorsal interneurons (dI2 and dI3; Quiroga et al., 2015).
dI3 Interneuron Characteristics
The dI3 neurons are excitatory interneurons in the deep dorsal horn and intermediate spinal cord (Liem et al., 1997; Gowan et al., 2001; Cheng et al., 2004). These cells target motor neurons monosynaptically, as revealed by recent rabies tracing experiments (Stepien et al., 2010). They have axons that project rostrally, ipsilaterally, and longitudinally in two fascicles. A ventral fascicle enters the ventral lateral funiculus (VLF) and the dorsal fascicle enters the dorsal funiculus (DF; Avraham et al., 2010). The dorsal projecting axons re-enter the cord when they encounter axons sensory axons at the dorsal root entry zone (DREZ; Avraham et al., 2010). Similarly, the ventrally projecting neurons re-enter the cord at ventral root exit points (Avraham et al., 2010). In mice model, dl3 appears to convey input from low threshold cutaneous afferents to the motor neurons that is critical in hand/forelimb grip (Bui et al., 2013). The dI3 pool also expresses Tlx3 (T-cell leukemia homeobox 3) and LIM-HD transcription factor Isl1-expressing cells (Figure 4I; Gross et al., 2002). The turning behavior of dI3 neurons is dependent on Isl1, and expression of Isl1 in dI1 neurons conferred dI3-like axon choice points to dI1 neurons (Avraham et al., 2010). Tlx1 (also known as Hox11) and Tlx3 (also known as Rnx and Hox11L2) are markers of glutamatergic signaling. Tlx3 functions cell-autonomously to specify a glutamatergic neurotransmitter phenotype (Cheng et al., 2004).
dI3 Birth and Early Development
The roof-plate dependent Class A dP3 progenitors express the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factor Mash1 (Ascl1, Mouse Achaete-scute complex-like 1), as do adjacent pd4 and pd5 domains (Gowan et al., 2001; Helms et al., 2005). They also express Olig3, Pax7 and Ngn2 and Gsh2 (Muller et al., 2005). In chick spinal cord electroporation experiments it has been shown that over-expression of Olig3 increases dI3 interneurons at the expense of other Classes A and B neuron classes and this effect is enhanced by Mash1 (Muller et al., 2005). Over-expression of Mash1 results in more dI3 and dI5 neurons at the expense of dI2 and dI4 (Muller et al., 2005), while loss of Mash1 causes a decrease in dI3 and dI5 populations while dI4 is maintained (Helms et al., 2005). As mentioned above, loss of function experiments with BMP7 in chick and Bmp7 mutant mice results in loss of dI1, dI3, and dI5 (Le Dréau et al., 2012).
dI4 Interneuron Characteristics
The early born (E10.5–E11) dI4 interneurons become Pax2+, Lhx1+, and Lhx5+ GABAergic ipsilaterally projecting somatosensory associative neurons that migrate laterally to the deep dorsal horn (Figure 4J; Gross et al., 2002; Muller et al., 2002; Pillai et al., 2007). In addition, both dI4 and dI5 interneurons also express Gsh1 (Gsx1) and Gsh2 post-mitotically, while dI3 only express Gsh2 (Kriks et al., 2005; Muller et al., 2005; Mizuguchi et al., 2006). They are GABAergic, calbindin+ and express the nociceptive marker PLCγ (Chen et al., 2001; Helms and Johnson, 2003). The dI4 fate is dependent on Ptf1a and loss of this gene results in loss of all GABAergic dorsal neurons and respecification to dI5 fate (Henke et al., 2009; Meredith et al., 2009). Loss of Lhx1 and Lhx5 results in a loss of Pax2, Viaat, and Gad1 (Pillai et al., 2007). In addition, Pax2 is required for the maintained expression of Lhx1, Lhx5, Pax5, and Pax8 (Pillai et al., 2007).
dI4 Birth and Early Development
The roof-plate independent Class B dP4 domain expresses Lbx1, Mash1 and higher levels of Pax7 than the dorsally adjacent pD3 domain (Gross et al., 2002; Muller et al., 2002). These progenitors are born between E10.5 and E11 and this domain is distinct from the dIL progenitor domain that produces dILA and dILB progenitors, although both have very similar transcription factor expression patterns (below). Olig3 over-expression can inhibit formation of dI4, and loss can result in expansion of this domain (Muller et al., 2005). While these cells express Mash1, loss of Mash1 does not block dI4 formation, yet it does disrupt dI3 and dI5 (Helms et al., 2005).
dI5 Interneuron Characteristics
The roof-plate independent Class B dI5 neurons become contralaterally projecting glutamatergic somatosensory interneurons of the deep dorsal horn (nucleus proprius) and ventral horn that express the homeodomain transcription factors Lbx1, Brn3a, Tlx1, Tlx3, and Lmx1b (Figure 4K; Gross et al., 2002; Muller et al., 2002; Qian et al., 2002; Ding et al., 2005; Glasgow et al., 2005). In addition, a subset expresses PhoxA2 (Ding et al., 2004). These interneurons were previously known as D4.
dI5 Birth and Early Development
These cells are born between E10.5–E11 and arise from a Mash1+ and Pax7+ dP5 progenitor domain that express Lbx1 post-mitotically to both reinforce Class B fate and oppose Class A fates (Figure 4K; Gross et al., 2002; Muller et al., 2002). The dI5 domain expresses Gsh1 and Gsh2, as does the adjacent dI4 domain (Kriks et al., 2005). As noted previously, loss of function experiments with BMP7 in chick and Bmp7 mutant mice results in loss of dI1, dI3, and dI5 (Le Dréau et al., 2012).
dI6 Interneuron Characteristics
The roof-plate independent Class B dI6 commissural inhibitory interneurons express Lbx1, Lhx1, Lhx5, and are Pax2 positive, indicating a GABAergic fate (Figure 4L; Gross et al., 2002; Muller et al., 2002; Cheng et al., 2004; Glasgow et al., 2005; Pillai et al., 2007). These cells may also use glycine for neurotransmission (Goulding, 2009). Although arising from a dorsal progenitor pool, and not being part of the “V” interneurons, the dI6 group of interneurons gives rise to more than one subtype and appears to contribute to motor function (Gross et al., 2002; Muller et al., 2002; Lanuza et al., 2004). These inhibitory neurons are reported in unpublished observations to be commissural and may be involved in right–left alternation, as well (Goulding, 2009). Dmrt3, a novel marker in dl6 interneuron was traced to play a key role in locomotor circuitry and in development of commissural interneurons, and mutation in dmrt3 result in divergent in gait pattern in mice models (Andersson et al., 2012; Vallstedt and Kullander, 2013). Double knockout of Lhx1 and Lhx5 results in a loss of Pax2, Viaat, and Gad1 expression (Pillai et al., 2007). Furthermore, Pax2 is required for the maintained expression of Lhx1, Lhx5, Pax5, and Pax8 (Pillai et al., 2007). These cells also express WT1 (Wilms’ tumor 1; Goulding, 2009). The transcription factor, Bhlhb5, marks the dI6, V1 and V2 domains (Ramos et al., 2010). Electrophysiologic characteristics of the dl6 interneurons around a central canal reveal two possible subtypes: one firing trains of action potentials that are loosely coupled to the ventral root output and expressing intrinsic rhythmic activity which suggests a role in locomotor rhythm generation. The other subtype fires action potentials that are tightly coupled to the ventral root output (Dyck et al., 2012).
dI6 Birth and Early Development
The dI6 neurons are born around E10.5–E11 and originate from a Pax7+, Dbx2+, Ngn1+ and Ngn2+ pD6 progenitor domain. Post-mitotically they express Bhlhb5, Wt1, Lbx1, Lhx1, Lhx5, and Pax2 (references above).
Late Born Dorsal Interneurons
The dIL neurons represent a second wave of neurogenesis from the dIL progenitor domain that constitutes most of the interneurons in the superficial dorsal horn in Rexed laminae II–IV (Gross et al., 2002; Muller et al., 2002). These cells are formed from common progenitors, and their cell fates are controlled by Ascl1/Mash1 (Figure 4M; Mizuguchi et al., 2006).
dILA Interneuron Characteristics
The roof-plate independent Class B ILA interneurons are ipsilaterally projecting association neurons that occupy the superficial dorsal horn in Rexed laminae I–III (Gross et al., 2000). These inhibitory neurons are GABAergic and are calbindin+, and a subset express Gbx1 (John et al., 2005; Mizuguchi et al., 2006).
dILA Birth and Early Development
The dILA interneurons are late born (E.13.5) and arise from the dIL progenitor domain that is Lbx1+, Lhx1/5+, and Pax2+(Pillai et al., 2007). The sensory relay interneuron maker Foxd3 is downregulated in these cells (Gross et al., 2002). Pax2 has been shown to be necessary for GABAergic differentiation and 98% of these cells also express Gad1 (GAD67; Cheng et al., 2004). The dILA subclass is dependent on Ptf1a and loss of this gene results in trans-fate to the dILB identity (Glasgow et al., 2005).
dILB Interneuron Characteristics
The roof-plate independent Class B are DRG11+ ipsilaterally projecting association interneurons that integrate input from cutaneous sensory neurons that detect noxious stimuli (Chen et al., 2001; Gross et al., 2002). This last-born subclass gives rise to glutamatergic neurons expressing Tlx1 and Tlx3 and Lmx1b (Cheng et al., 2004; Mizuguchi et al., 2006). The dILB neurons migrate dorsolaterally to settle in the superficial dorsal horn in Rexed laminae I–III (Gross et al., 2000; Muller et al., 2002). Over 96% of the dorsolateral population of these cells expresses both Tlx3 and VGluT2 (Cheng et al., 2004; Glasgow et al., 2005).
dILB Birth and Early Development
These neurons are born later than the dI1–6 class and express Lbx1 post-mitotically (Gross et al., 2000; Muller et al., 2002). Mash1 controls the upregulation of Notch signaling to direct formation of dILB from common dIL progenitors (Mizuguchi et al., 2006).
Combinatorial transcriptional control of cell fate is a mature perspective for understanding spinal cord development. This focus on transcription factors has been powerful in two major respects. First, it has allowed the identification of downstream factors that direct cell-specific characteristics, such as neurotransmitter status (Cheng et al., 2004). Second, it has permitted a powerful genetic analysis of spinal neurons, using transcription factors as class-specific tools to drive changes in cell fate and function (Lee et al., 2000; Zhang et al., 2008). Novel techniques are emerging for tracing neuronal circuitry and for the sophisticated manipulation of neuronal activity, including selective cellular ablation, optogenetic activation and silencing, and chemically induced activation and silencing (Boyden et al., 2005; Wickersham et al., 2007; Alexander et al., 2009). These techniques may reach their most exciting potential when coupled with the increasingly specific genetic control available in the spinal cord.
The further refinement of developmental neuronal classes is showing that subclasses may reflect functionally coherent groups of cells that can be mapped onto physiologically identified populations (Figure 5). Therefore, as the spinal cord development field grows to incorporate circuitry and behavior, it is merging with the rich field of adult spinal cord electrophysiology that has uncovered major mechanisms of spinal cord function. The combination of these disciplines will advance spinal cord biology to a state that fully encompasses both form and function.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
We apologize to the researchers whose work was not included due to space constraints. We thank Samuel Pfaff for support; and Ariel Levine, Marito Hayashi, and members of the Pfaff Laboratory for critical reading of this manuscript.
Al-Mosawie, A., Wilson, J. M., and Brownstone, R. M. (2007). Heterogeneity of V2-derived interneurons in the adult mouse spinal cord. Eur. J. Neurosci. 26, 3003–3015. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05907.x
Alexander, G. M., Rogan, S. C., Abbas, A. I., Armbruster, B. N., Pei, Y., Allen, A. J., et al. (2009). Remote control of neuronal activity in transgenic mice expressing evolved G protein-coupled receptors. Neuron 63, 27–39. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.06.014
Alvarez, F. J., Dewey, D. E., McMillin, P., and Fyffe, R. E. (1999). Distribution of cholinergic contacts on Renshaw cells in the rat spinal cord: a light microscopic study. J. Physiol. 515(Pt 3), 787–797. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1999.787ab.x
Alvarez, F. J., Jonas, P. C., Sapir, T., Hartley, R., Berrocal, M. C., Geiman, E. J., et al. (2005). Postnatal phenotype and localization of spinal cord V1 derived interneurons. J. Comp. Neurol. 493, 177–92. doi: 10.1002/cne.20711
Andersson, L. S., Larhammar, M., Memic, F., Wootz, H., Schwochow, D., Rubin, C.-J., et al. (2012). Mutations in DMRT3 affect locomotion in horses and spinal circuit function in mice. Nature 488, 642–646. doi: 10.1038/nature11399
Arber, S., Han, B., Mendelsohn, M., Smith, M., Jessell, T. M., and Sockanathan, S. (1999). Requirement for the homeobox gene Hb9 in the consolidation of motor neuron identity. Neuron 23, 659–674. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)80026-X
Ashrafi, S., Lalancette-Hebert, M., Friese, A., Sigrist, M., Arber, S., Shneider, N. A., et al. (2012). Wnt7A identifies embryonic gamma-motor neurons and reveals early postnatal dependence of gamma-motor neurons on a muscle spindle-derived signal. J. Neurosci. 32, 8725–8731. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1160-12.2012
Avraham, O., Hadas, Y., Vald, L., Hong, S., Song, M. R., and Klar, A. (2010). Motor and dorsal root ganglion axons serve as choice points for the ipsilateral turning of dI3 axons. J. Neurosci. 30, 15546–15557. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2380-10.2010
Avraham, O., Hadas, Y., Vald, L., Zisman, S., Schejter, A., Visel, A., et al. (2009). Transcriptional control of axonal guidance and sorting in dorsal interneurons by the Lim-HD proteins Lhx9 and Lhx1. Neural Dev. 4:21. doi: 10.1186/1749-8104-4-21
Benito-Gonzalez, A., and Alvarez, F. J. (2012). Renshaw cells and Ia inhibitory interneurons are generated at different times from p1 progenitors and differentiate shortly after exiting the cell cycle. J. Neurosci. 32, 1156–1170. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3630-12.2012
Bermingham, N. A., Hassan, B. A., Wang, V. Y., Fernandez, M., Banfi, S., Bellen, H. J., et al. (2001). Proprioceptor pathway development is dependent on Math1. Neuron 30, 411–422. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00305-1
Blacklaws, J., Deska-Gauthier, D., Jones, C. T., Petracca, Y. L., Liu, M., Zhang, H., et al. (2015). Sim1 is required for the migration and axonal projections of V3 interneurons in the developing mouse spinal cord. Dev. Neurobiol. doi: 10.1002/dneu.22266 [Epub ahead of print].
Borowska, J., Jones, C. T., Zhang, H., Blacklaws, J., Goulding, M., and Zhang, Y. (2013). Functional subpopulations of V3 interneurons in the mature mouse spinal cord. J. Neurosci. 33, 18553–18565. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2005-13.2013
Boyden, E. S., Zhang, F., Bamberg, E., Nagel, G., and Deisseroth, K. (2005). Millisecond-timescale, genetically targeted optical control of neural activity. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 1263–1268. doi: 10.1038/nn1525
Briscoe, J., Pierani, A., Jessell, T. M., and Ericson, J. (2000). A homeodomain protein code specifies progenitor cell identity and neuronal fate in the ventral neural tube. Cell 101, 435–45. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80853-3
Briscoe, J., Sussel, L., Serup, P., Hartigan-O’Connor, D., Jessell, T. M., Rubenstein, J. L., et al. (1999). Homeobox gene Nkx2.2 and specification of neuronal identity by graded Sonic hedgehog signalling. Nature 398, 622–627. doi: 10.1038/19315
Bui, T. V., Akay, T., Loubani, O., Hnasko, T. S., Jessell, T. M., and Brownstone, R. M. (2013). Circuits for grasping: spinal dI3 interneurons mediate cutaneous control of motor behavior. Neuron 78, 191–204. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.02.007
Burrill, J. D., Moran, L., Goulding, M. D., and Saueressig, H. (1997). PAX2 is expressed in multiple spinal cord interneurons, including a population of EN1+ interneurons that require PAX6 for their development. Development 124, 4493–4503.
Chen, Z. F., Rebelo, S., White, F., Malmberg, A. B., Baba, H., Lima, D., et al. (2001). The paired homeodomain protein DRG11 is required for the projection of cutaneous sensory afferent fibers to the dorsal spinal cord. Neuron 31, 59–73. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00341-5
Cheng, L., Arata, A., Mizuguchi, R., Qian, Y., Karunaratne, A., Gray, P. A., et al. (2004). Tlx3 and Tlx1 are post-mitotic selector genes determining glutamatergic over GABAergic cell fates. Nat. Neurosci. 7, 510–517. doi: 10.1038/nn1221
Crone, S. A., Quinlan, K. A., Zagoraiou, L., Droho, S., Restrepo, C. E., Lundfald, L., et al. (2008). Genetic ablation of V2a ipsilateral interneurons disrupts left-right locomotor coordination in mammalian spinal cord. Neuron 60, 70–83. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.08.009
Crone, S. A., Zhong, G., Harris-Warrick, R., and Sharma, K. (2009). In mice lacking V2a interneurons, gait depends on speed of locomotion. J. Neurosci. 29, 7098–7109. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1206-09.2009
Dasen, J. S., De Camilli, A., Wang, B., Tucker, P. W., and Jessell, T. M. (2008). Hox repertoires for motor neuron diversity and connectivity gated by a single accessory factor, FoxP1. Cell 134, 304–316. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.06.019
Dasen, J. S., Tice, B. C., Brenner-Morton, S., and Jessell, T. M. (2005). A Hox regulatory network establishes motor neuron pool identity and target-muscle connectivity. Cell 123, 477–491. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.09.009
Del Barrio, M. G., Taveira-Marques, R., Muroyama, Y., Yuk, D. I., Li, S., Wines-Samuelson, M., et al. (2007). A regulatory network involving Foxn4, Mash1 and delta-like 4/Notch1 generates V2a and V2b spinal interneurons from a common progenitor pool. Development 134, 3427–3436. doi: 10.1242/dev.005868
De Marco Garcia, N. V., and Jessell, T. M. (2008). Early motor neuron pool identity and muscle nerve trajectory defined by postmitotic restrictions in Nkx6.1 activity. Neuron 57, 217–231. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.11.033
Ding, Y. Q., Kim, J. Y., Xu, Y. S., Rao, Y., and Chen, Z. F. (2005). Ventral migration of early-born neurons requires Dcc and is essential for the projections of primary afferents in the spinal cord. Development 132, 2047–2056. doi: 10.1242/dev.01798
Ding, Y. Q., Yin, J., Kania, A., Zhao, Z. Q., Johnson, R. L., and Chen, Z. F. (2004). Lmx1b controls the differentiation and migration of the superficial dorsal horn neurons of the spinal cord. Development 131, 3693–3703. doi: 10.1242/dev.01250
Dottori, M., Hartley, L., Galea, M., Paxinos, G., Polizzotto, M., Kilpatrick, T., et al. (1998). EphA4 (Sek1) receptor tyrosine kinase is required for the development of the corticospinal tract. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95, 13248–13253. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.22.13248
Duval, N., Daubas, P., Bourcier de Carbon, C., St Cloment, C., Tinevez, J. Y., Lopes, M., et al. (2014). Msx1 and Msx2 act as essential activators of Atoh1 expression in the murine spinal cord. Development 141, 1726–1736. doi: 10.1242/dev.099002
Eccles, J. C., Fatt, P., and Koketsu, K. (1954). Cholinergic and inhibitory synapses in a pathway from motor-axon collaterals to motoneurones. J. Physiol. 126, 524–562. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1954.sp005226
Ericson, J., Morton, S., Kawakami, A., Roelink, H., and Jessell, T. M. (1996). Two critical periods of Sonic Hedgehog signaling required for the specification of motor neuron identity. Cell 87, 661–673. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81386-0
Ericson, J., Thor, S., Edlund, T., Jessell, T. M., and Yamada, T. (1992). Early stages of motor neuron differentiation revealed by expression of homeobox gene Islet-1. Science 256, 1555–1560. doi: 10.1126/science.1350865
Francius, C., and Clotman, F. (2010). Dynamic expression of the Onecut transcription factors HNF-6, OC-2 and OC-3 during spinal motor neuron development. Neuroscience 165, 116–129. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.09.076
Francius, C., Harris, A., Rucchin, V., Hendricks, T. J., Stam, F. J., Barber, M., et al. (2013). Identification of multiple subsets of ventral interneurons and differential distribution along the rostrocaudal axis of the developing spinal cord. PLoS ONE 8:e70325. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070325
Francius, C., Ravassard, P., Hidalgo-Figueroa, M., Mallet, J., Clotman, F., and Nardelli, J. (2014). Genetic dissection of Gata2 selective functions during specification of V2 interneurons in the developing spinal cord. Dev. Neurobiol. doi: 10.1002/dneu.22244 [Epub ahead of print].
Friese, A., Kaltschmidt, J. A., Ladle, D. R., Sigrist, M., Jessell, T. M., and Arber, S. (2009). Gamma and alpha motor neurons distinguished by expression of transcription factor Err3. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 13588–13593. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906809106
Geiman, E. J., Knox, M. C., and Alvarez, F. J. (2000). Postnatal maturation of gephyrin/glycine receptor clusters on developing Renshaw cells. J. Comp. Neurol. 426, 130–142. doi: 10.1002/1096-9861(20001009)426:1<130::AID-CNE9>3.0.CO;2-7
Glasgow, S. M., Henke, R. M., Macdonald, R. J., Wright, C. V., and Johnson, J. E. (2005). Ptf1a determines GABAergic over glutamatergic neuronal cell fate in the spinal cord dorsal horn. Development 132, 5461–5469. doi: 10.1242/dev.02167
Gosgnach, S., Lanuza, G. M., Butt, S. J., Saueressig, H., Zhang, Y., Velasquez, T., et al. (2006). V1 spinal neurons regulate the speed of vertebrate locomotor outputs. Nature 440, 215–219. doi: 10.1038/nature04545
Gould, T. W., Buss, R. R., Vinsant, S., Prevette, D., Sun, W., Knudsonet, M., et al. (2006). Complete dissociation of motor neuron death from motor dysfunction by Bax deletion in a mouse model of ALS. J. Neurosci. 26, 8774–8786. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2315-06.2006
Gould, T. W., Yonemura, S., Oppenheim, R. W., Ohmori, S., and Enomoto, H. (2008). The neurotrophic effects of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor on spinal motoneurons are restricted to fusimotor subtypes. J. Neurosci. 28, 2131–2146. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5185-07.2008
Gowan, K., Helms, A. W., Hunsaker, T. L., Collisson, T., Ebert, P. J., Odom, R., et al. (2001). Crossinhibitory activities of Ngn1 and Math1 allow specification of distinct dorsal interneurons. Neuron 31, 219–232. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00367-1
Griener, A., Zhang, W., Kao, H., Wagner, C., and Gosgnach, S. (2015). Probing diversity within subpopulations of locomotor-related V0 interneurons. Dev. Neurobiol. doi: 10.1002/dneu.22277 [Epub ahead of print].
Gross, M. K., Moran-Rivard, L., Velasquez, T., Nakatsu, M. N., Jagla, K., and Goulding, M. (2000). Lbx1 is required for muscle precursor migration along a lateral pathway into the limb. Development 127, 413–424.
Hanson, M. G., and Landmesser, L. T. (2004). Normal patterns of spontaneous activity are required for correct motor axon guidance and the expression of specific guidance molecules. Neuron 43, 687–701. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.08.018
Helms, A. W., Battiste, J., Henke, R. M., Nakada, Y., Simplicio, N., Guillemot, F., et al. (2005). Sequential roles for Mash1 and Ngn2 in the generation of dorsal spinal cord interneurons. Development 132, 2709–2719. doi: 10.1242/dev.01859
Henke, R. M., Savage, T. K., Meredith, D. M., Glasgow, S. M., Hori, K., Dumas, J., et al. (2009). Neurog2 is a direct downstream target of the Ptf1a-Rbpj transcription complex in dorsal spinal cord. Development 136, 2945–2954. doi: 10.1242/dev.035352
Hinckley, C. A., Hartley, R., Wu, L., Todd, A., and Ziskind-Conhaim, L. (2005). Locomotor-like rhythms in a genetically distinct cluster of interneurons in the mammalian spinal cord. J. Neurophysiol. 93, 1439–1449. doi: 10.1152/jn.00647.2004
Hinckley, C. A., and Ziskind-Conhaim, L. (2006). Electrical coupling between locomotor-related excitatory interneurons in the mammalian spinal cord. J. Neurosci. 26, 8477–8483. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0395-06.2006
Holz, A., Kollmus, H., Ryge, J., Niederkofler, V., Dias, J., Ericson, J., et al. (2010). The transcription factors Nkx2.2 and Nkx2.9 play a novel role in floor plate development and commissural axon guidance. Development 137, 4249–4260. doi: 10.1242/dev.053819
Hultborn, H., Jankowska, E., and Lindstrom, S. (1971). Recurrent inhibition of interneurones monosynaptically activated from group Ia afferents. J. Physiol. 215, 613–636. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009488
Hultborn, H., and Udo, M. (1972). Convergence of large muscle spindle (Ia) afferents at interneuronal level in the reciprocal Ia inhibitory pathway to motoneurones. Acta Physiol. Scand. 84, 493–499. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1972.tb05199.x
Ji, S. J., Zhuang, B., Falco, C., Schneider, A., Schuster-Gossler, K., Gossler, A., et al. (2006). Mesodermal and neuronal retinoids regulate the induction and maintenance of limb innervating spinal motor neurons. Dev. Biol. 297, 249–261. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.05.015
John, A., Wildner, H., and Britsch, S. (2005). The homeodomain transcription factor Gbx1 identifies a subpopulation of late-born GABAergic interneurons in the developing dorsal spinal cord. Dev. Dyn. 234, 767–771. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.20568
Jung, H., Lacombe, J., Mazzoni, E. O., Liem, K. F. Jr., Grinstein, J., Mahony, S., et al. (2010). Global control of motor neuron topography mediated by the repressive actions of a single hox gene. Neuron 67, 781–796. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.08.008
Kang, K., Lee, D., Hong, S., Park, S. G., and Song, M. R. (2013). The E3 ligase Mind bomb-1 (Mib1) modulates Delta-Notch signaling to control neurogenesis and gliogenesis in the developing spinal cord. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 2580–2592. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.398263
Kimura, Y., Okamura, Y., and Higashijima, S. (2006). alx, a zebrafish homolog of Chx10, marks ipsilateral descending excitatory interneurons that participate in the regulation of spinal locomotor circuits. J. Neurosci. 26, 5684–5697. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4993-05.2006
Kimura, Y., Satou, C., and Higashijima, S. (2008). V2a and V2b neurons are generated by the final divisions of pair-producing progenitors in the zebrafish spinal cord. Development 135, 3001–3005. doi: 10.1242/dev.024802
Kriks, S., Lanuza, G. M., Mizuguchi, R., Nakafuku, M., and Goulding, M. (2005). Gsh2 is required for the repression of Ngn1 and specification of dorsal interneuron fate in the spinal cord. Development 132, 2991–3002. doi: 10.1242/dev.01878
Kullander, K., Croll, S. D., Zimmer, M., Pan, L., McClain, J., Hughes, V., et al. (2001). Ephrin-B3 is the midline barrier that prevents corticospinal tract axons from recrossing, allowing for unilateral motor control. Genes Dev. 15, 877–888. doi: 10.1101/gad.868901
Kwan, A. C., Dietz, S. B., Webb, W. W., and Harris-Warrick, R. M. (2009). Activity of Hb9 interneurons during fictive locomotion in mouse spinal cord. J. Neurosci. 29, 11601–11613. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1612-09.2009
Ladle, D. R., Pecho-Vrieseling, E., and Arber, S. (2007). Assembly of motor circuits in the spinal cord: driven to function by genetic and experience-dependent mechanisms. Neuron 56, 270–283. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.09.026
Lanuza, G. M., Gosgnach, S., Pierani, A., Jessell, T. M., and Goulding, M. (2004). Genetic identification of spinal interneurons that coordinate left-right locomotor activity necessary for walking movements. Neuron 42, 375–386. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(04)00249-1
Le Dréau, G., Garcia-Campmany, L., Rabadán, M. A., Ferronha, T., Tozer, S., Briscoe, J., et al. (2012). Canonical BMP7 activity is required for the generation of discrete neuronal populations in the dorsal spinal cord. Development 139, 259–268. doi: 10.1242/dev.074948
Lee, K. J., Mendelsohn, M., and Jessell, T. M. (1998). Neuronal patterning by BMPs: a requirement for GDF7 in the generation of a discrete class of commissural interneurons in the mouse spinal cord. Genes Dev. 12, 3394–3407. doi: 10.1101/gad.12.21.3394
Lee, S., Lee, B., Joshi, K., Pfaff, S. L., Lee, J. W., and Lee, S. K. (2008). A regulatory network to segregate the identity of neuronal subtypes. Dev. Cell 14, 877–889. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.03.021
Liem, K. F. Jr., Tremml, G., and Jessell, T. M. (1997). A role for the roof plate and its resident TGFbeta-related proteins in neuronal patterning in the dorsal spinal cord. Cell 91, 127–138. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)80015-5
Liem, K. F. Jr., Tremml, G., Roelink, H., and Jessell, T. M. (1995). Dorsal differentiation of neural plate cells induced by BMP-mediated signals from epidermal ectoderm. Cell 82, 969–979. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90276-7
Lin, J. H., Saito, T., Anderson, D. J., Lance-Jones, C., Jessell, T. M., and Arber, S. (1998). Functionally related motor neuron pool and muscle sensory afferent subtypes defined by coordinate ETS gene expression. Cell 95, 393–407. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81770-5
Liu, J. P., Laufer, E., and Jessell, T. M. (2001). Assigning the positional identity of spinal motor neurons: rostrocaudal patterning of Hox-c expression by FGFs, Gdf11, and retinoids. Neuron 32, 997–1012. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00544-X
Lundfald, L., Restrepo, C. E., Butt, S. J., Peng, C. Y., Droho, S., Endo, T., et al. (2007). Phenotype of V2-derived interneurons and their relationship to the axon guidance molecule EphA4 in the developing mouse spinal cord. Eur. J. Neurosci. 26, 2989–3002. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05906.x
Marion, J. F., Yang, C., Caqueret, A., Boucher, F., and Michaud, J. L. (2005). Sim1 and Sim2 are required for the correct targeting of mammillary body axons. Development 132, 5527–5537. doi: 10.1242/dev.02142
Matise, M. P., and Joyner, A. L. (1997). Expression patterns of developmental control genes in normal and Engrailed-1 mutant mouse spinal cord reveal early diversity in developing interneurons. J. Neurosci. 17, 7805–7816.
McLean, D. L., Masino, M. A., Koh, I. Y., Lindquist, W. B., and Fetcho, J. R. (2008). Continuous shifts in the active set of spinal interneurons during changes in locomotor speed. Nat. Neurosci. 11, 1419–1429. doi: 10.1038/nn.2225
Mentis, G. Z., Alvarez, F. J., Bonnot, A., Richards, D. S., Gonzalez-Forero, D., Zerda, R., et al. (2005). Noncholinergic excitatory actions of motoneurons in the neonatal mammalian spinal cord. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 7344–7349. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0502788102
Meredith, D. M., Masui, T., Swift, G. H., MacDonald, R. J., and Johnson, J. E. (2009). Multiple transcriptional mechanisms control Ptf1a levels during neural development including autoregulation by the PTF1-J complex. J. Neurosci. 29, 11139–11148. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2303-09.2009
Miesegaes, G. R., Klisch, T. J., Thaller, C., Ahmad, K. A., Atkinson, R. C., and Zoghbi, H. Y. (2009). Identification and subclassification of new Atoh1 derived cell populations during mouse spinal cord development. Dev. Biol. 327, 339–351. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.12.016
Misra, M., Shah, V., Carpenter, E., McCaffery, P., and Lance-Jones, C. (2009). Restricted patterns of Hoxd10 and Hoxd11 set segmental differences in motoneuron subtype complement in the lumbosacral spinal cord. Dev. Biol. 330, 54–72. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.03.009
Mizuguchi, R., Kriks, S., Cordes, R., Gossler, A., Ma, Q., and Goulding, M. (2006). Ascl1 and Gsh1/2 control inhibitory and excitatory cell fate in spinal sensory interneurons. Nat. Neurosci. 9, 770–778. doi: 10.1038/nn1706
Moran-Rivard, L., Kagawa, T., Saueressig, H., Gross, M. K., Burrill, J., Goulding, M., et al. (2001). Evx1 is a postmitotic determinant of v0 interneuron identity in the spinal cord. Neuron 29, 385–399. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00213-6
Muhr, J., Graziano, E., Wilson, S., Jessell, T. M., and Edlund, T. (1999). Convergent inductive signals specify midbrain, hindbrain, and spinal cord identity in gastrula stage chick embryos. Neuron 23, 689–702. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)80028-3
Muller, T., Anlag, K., Wildner, H., Britsch, S., Treier, M., and Birchmeier, C. (2005). The bHLH factor Olig3 coordinates the specification of dorsal neurons in the spinal cord. Genes Dev. 19, 733–743. doi: 10.1101/gad.326105
Muller, T., Brohmann, H., Pierani, A., Heppenstall, P. A., Lewin, G. R., et al. (2002). The homeodomain factor lbx1 distinguishes two major programs of neuronal differentiation in the dorsal spinal cord. Neuron 34, 551–562. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00689-X
Muroyama, Y., Fujihara, M., Ikeya, M., Kondoh, H., and Takada, S. (2002). Wnt signaling plays an essential role in neuronal specification of the dorsal spinal cord. Genes Dev. 16, 548–553. doi: 10.1101/gad.937102
Myers, C. P., Lewcock, J. W., Hanson, M. G., Gosgnach, S., Aimone, J. B., Gage, H. F., et al. (2005). Cholinergic input is required during embryonic development to mediate proper assembly of spinal locomotor circuits. Neuron 46, 37–49. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.02.022
Novitch, B. G., Chen, A. I., and Jessell, T. M. (2001). Coordinate regulation of motor neuron subtype identity and pan-neuronal properties by the bHLH repressor Olig2. Neuron 31, 773–789. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00407-X
Okigawa, S., Mizoguchi, T., Okano, M., Tanaka, H., Isoda, M., Isoda, M., Jiang, Y. J., et al. (2014). Different combinations of Notch ligands and receptors regulate V2 interneuron progenitor proliferation and V2a/V2b cell fate determination. Dev. Biol. 391, 196–206. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2014.04.011
Panayi, H., Panayiotou, E., Orford, M., Genethliou, N., Mean, R., Lapathitis, G., et al. (2010). Sox1 is required for the specification of a novel p2-derived interneuron subtype in the mouse ventral spinal cord. J. Neurosci. 30, 12274–12280. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2402-10.2010
Peng, C. Y., Yajima, H., Burns, C. E., Zon, L. I., Sisodia, S. S., Pfaff, S. L., et al. (2007). Notch and MAML signaling drives Scl-dependent interneuron diversity in the spinal cord. Neuron 53, 813–827. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.02.019
Pfaff, S. L., Mendelsohn, M., Stewart, C. L., Edlund, T., and Jessell, T. M. (1996). Requirement for LIM homeobox gene Isl1 in motor neuron generation reveals a motor neuron-dependent step in interneuron differentiation. Cell 84, 309–320. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80985-X
Pierani, A., Brenner-Morton, S., Chiang, C., and Jessell, T. M. (1999). A sonic hedgehog-independent, retinoid-activated pathway of neurogenesis in the ventral spinal cord. Cell 97, 903–915. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80802-8
Pierani, A., Moran-Rivard, L., Sunshine, M. J., Littman, D. R., Goulding, M., and Jessell, T. M. (2001). Control of interneuron fate in the developing spinal cord by the progenitor homeodomain protein Dbx1. Neuron 29, 367–384. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00212-4
Pillai, A., Mansouri, A., Behringer, R., Westphal, H., and Goulding, M. (2007). Lhx1 and Lhx5 maintain the inhibitory-neurotransmitter status of interneurons in the dorsal spinal cord. Development 134, 357–366. doi: 10.1242/dev.02717
Qian, Y., Shirasawa, S., Chen, C. L., Cheng, L., and Ma, Q. (2002). Proper development of relay somatic sensory neurons and D2/D4 interneurons requires homeobox genes Rnx/Tlx-3 and Tlx-1. Genes Dev. 16, 1220–1233. doi: 10.1101/gad.982802
Quiroga, A. C., Stolt, C. C., Del Corral, R. D., Dimitrov, S., Perez-Alcala, S., Sock, E., et al. (2015). Sox5 controls dorsal progenitor and interneuron specification in the spinal cord. Dev. Neurobiol. 75, 522–538. doi: 10.1002/dneu.22240
Ramos, C., Rocha, S., Gaspar, C., and Henrique, D. (2010). Two Notch ligands, Dll1 and Jag1, are differently restricted in their range of action to control neurogenesis in the mammalian spinal cord. PLoS ONE 5:e15515. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015515
Richards, D. S., Griffith, R. W., Romer, S. H., and Alvarez, F. J. (2014). Motor axon synapses on renshaw cells contain higher levels of aspartate than glutamate. PLoS ONE 9:e97240. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097240
Roelink, H., Augsburger, A., Heemskerk, J., Korzh, V., Norlin, S., Ruiz i Altaba, A., et al. (1994). Floor plate and motor neuron induction by vhh-1, a vertebrate homolog of hedgehog expressed by the notochord. Cell 76, 761–775. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90514-2
Sander, M., Paydar, S., Ericson, J., Briscoe, J., Berber, E., German, M., et al. (2000). Ventral neural patterning by Nkx homeobox genes: Nkx6.1 controls somatic motor neuron and ventral interneuron fates. Genes Dev. 14, 2134–2139. doi: 10.1101/gad.820400
Sapir, T., Geiman, E. J., Wang, Z., Velasquez, T., Mitsui, S., Yoshihara, Y., et al. (2004). Pax6 and engrailed 1 regulate two distinct aspects of renshaw cell development. J. Neurosci. 24, 1255–1264. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3187-03.2004
Scardigli, R., Schuurmans, C., Gradwohl, G., and Guillemot, F. (2001). Crossregulation between Neurogenin2 and pathways specifying neuronal identity in the spinal cord. Neuron 31, 203–217. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00358-0
Sharma, K., Sheng, H. Z., Lettieri, K., Li, H., Karavanov, A., Potter, S., et al. (1998). LIM homeodomain factors Lhx3 and Lhx4 assign subtype identities for motor neurons. Cell 95, 817–828. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81704-3
Shneider, N. A., Brown, M. N., Smith, C. A., Pickel, J., and Alvarez, F. J. (2009). Gamma motor neurons express distinct genetic markers at birth and require muscle spindle-derived GDNF for postnatal survival. Neural Dev. 4, 42. doi: 10.1186/1749-8104-4-42
Skaggs, K., Martin, D. M., and Novitch, B. G. (2011). Regulation of spinal interneuron development by the Olig-related protein Bhlhb5 and Notch signaling. Development 138, 3199–3211. doi: 10.1242/dev.057281
Sockanathan, S., Perlmann, T., and Jessell, T. M. (2003). Retinoid receptor signaling in postmitotic motor neurons regulates rostrocaudal positional identity and axonal projection pattern. Neuron 40, 97–111. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00532-4
Stam, F. J., Hendricks, T. J., Zhang, J., Geiman, E. J., Francius, C., Labosky, P. A., et al. (2012). Renshaw cell interneuron specialization is controlled by a temporally restricted transcription factor program. Development 139, 179–190. doi: 10.1242/dev.071134
Stepien, A. E., Tripodi, M., and Arber, S. (2010). Monosynaptic rabies virus reveals premotor network organization and synaptic specificity of cholinergic partition cells. Neuron 68, 456–472. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.10.019
Thaler, J., Harrison, K., Sharma, K., Lettieri, K., Kehrl, J., and Pfaff, S. L. (1999). Active suppression of interneuron programs within developing motor neurons revealed by analysis of homeodomain factor HB9. Neuron 23, 675–687. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)80027-1
Thaler, J. P., Koo, S. J., Kania, A., Lettieri, K., Andrews, S., Cox, C., et al. (2004). A postmitotic role for Isl-class LIM homeodomain proteins in the assignment of visceral spinal motor neuron identity. Neuron 41, 337–350. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(04)00011-X
Thaler, J. P., Lee, S. K., Jurata, L. W., Gill, G. N., and Pfaff, S. L. (2002). LIM factor Lhx3 contributes to the specification of motor neuron and interneuron identity through cell-type-specific protein-protein interactions. Cell 110, 237–249. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00823-1
Timmer, J. R., Wang, C., and Niswander, L. (2002). BMP signaling patterns the dorsal and intermediate neural tube via regulation of homeobox and helix-loop-helix transcription factors. Development 129, 2459–2472.
Tsuchida, T., Ensini, M., Morton, S. B., Baldassare, M., Edlund, T., Jessell, T. M., et al. (1994). Topographic organization of embryonic motor neurons defined by expression of LIM homeobox genes. Cell 79, 957–970. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90027-2
Vallstedt, A., Muhr, J., Pattyn, A., Pierani, A., Mendelsohn, M., Sander, M., et al. (2001). Different levels of repressor activity assign redundant and specific roles to Nkx6 genes in motor neuron and interneuron specification. Neuron 31, 743–755. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00412-3
Wenner, P., Matise, M. P., Joyner, A., and O’Donovan, M. J. (1998). Physiological and molecular characterization of interneurons in the developing spinal cord. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 860, 425–427. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1998.tb09066.x
Wenner, P., O’Donovan, M. J., and Matise, M. P. (2000). Topographical and physiological characterization of interneurons that express engrailed-1 in the embryonic chick spinal cord. J. Neurophysiol. 84, 2651–2657.
Wickersham, I. R., Lyon, D. C., Barnard, R. J., Mori, T., Finke, S., Conzelmann, K. K., et al. (2007). Monosynaptic restriction of transsynaptic tracing from single, genetically targeted neurons. Neuron 53, 639–647. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.01.033
Wilson, J. M., Hartley, R., Maxwell, D. J., Todd, A. J., Lieberam, I., Kaltschmidt, J. A., et al. (2005). Conditional rhythmicity of ventral spinal interneurons defined by expression of the Hb9 homeodomain protein. J. Neurosci. 25, 5710–5719. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0274-05.2005
Wilson, S. I., Shafer, B., Lee, K. J., and Dodd, J. (2008). A molecular program for contralateral trajectory: Rig-1 control by LIM homeodomain transcription factors. Neuron 59, 413–424. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.07.020
Yang, X., Tomita, T., Wines-Samuelson, M., Beglopoulos, V., Tansey, M. G., Kopan, R., et al. (2006). Notch1 signaling influences v2 interneuron and motor neuron development in the spinal cord. Dev. Neurosci. 28, 102–117. doi: 10.1159/000090757
Yokoyama, N., Romero, M. I., Cowan, C. A., Galvan, P., Helmbacher, F., Charnay, P., et al. (2001). Forward signaling mediated by ephrin-B3 prevents contralateral corticospinal axons from recrossing the spinal cord midline. Neuron 29, 85–97. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00182-9
Zagoraiou, L., Akay, T., Martin, J. F., Brownstone, R. M., Jessell, T. M., and Miles, G. B. (2009). A cluster of cholinergic premotor interneurons modulates mouse locomotor activity. Neuron 64, 645–662. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.10.017
Zhang, J., Lanuza, G. M., Britz, O., Wang, Z., Siembab, V. C., Zhang, Y., et al. (2014). V1 and v2b interneurons secure the alternating flexor-extensor motor activity mice require for limbed locomotion. Neuron 82, 138–150. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.02.013
Zhang, Y., Narayan, S., Geiman, E., Lanuza, G. M., Velasquez, T., Shanks, B., et al. (2008). V3 spinal neurons establish a robust and balanced locomotor rhythm during walking. Neuron 60, 84–96. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.09.027
Zhong, G., Droho, S., Crone, S. A., Dietz, S., Kwan, A. C., Kwan, A. C., et al. (2010). Electrophysiological characterization of V2a interneurons and their locomotor-related activity in the neonatal mouse spinal cord. J. Neurosci. 30, 170–182. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4849-09.2010
Keywords: interneuron, motor neuron, transcription factor, locomotion, sensory, circuit
Citation: Lu DC, Niu T and Alaynick WA (2015) Molecular and cellular development of spinal cord locomotor circuitry. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 8:25. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2015.00025
Received: 02 April 2015; Accepted: 30 May 2015;
Published online: 16 June 2015
Edited by:Robert W. Burgess, The Jackson Laboratory, USA
Reviewed by:Bruce R. Johnson, Cornell University, USA
Francisco Javier Alvarez, Emory University, USA
Copyright © 2015 Lu, Niu and Alaynick. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: William A. Alaynick, Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, 650 Charles East Young Drive, Wasserman Building, Room 562, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA, firstname.lastname@example.org