Abstract
In most mammalian species parent-offspring interactions during early life periods primarily comprise social contacts with the mother, whereas the role of males in parental care is one of the most overlooked and understudied topics. The present study addressed the hypothesis that the complete deprivation of paternal care delays or permanently retards synaptic connectivity in the brain, particularly in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) of the offspring in a sex-specific manner. Another aim of this study was to address the question whether and in which way replacing the father with a female caregiver (in our experiments the “aunt”) can “buffer” the detrimental effects of paternal deprivation on neuronal development. The comparison of: (a) single mother rearing; (b) biparental rearing by father and mother; and (c) biparental rearing by two female caregivers revealed that: (i) paternal care represents a critical environmental factor for synaptic and dendritic development of pyramidal neurons in the vmPFC of their offspring; (ii) a second female caregiver (“aunt”) does not “buffer” the neuronal consequences of paternal deprivation; and that (iii) neuronal development in the vmPFC is differentially affected in male and female offspring in response to different family constellations.
Introduction
The vast majority of studies emphasize the important role of the mother in supporting infant growth and survival and facilitating cognitive as well social-emotional development (Meaney, 2001; Zhang et al., 2013; Bock et al., 2014; Maccari et al., 2014; Glynn and Baram, 2019). In contrast, the father’s contribution to infant development has been less studied. This is surprising since in humans as well as in several other bi-parental mammalian species the father represents a major source of emotional and social interactions (Feldman et al., 2019). Recent studies comparing maternal and paternal behavior in humans showed that fathers provide the same level of sensitivity as mothers during interactions with their children and make a unique contribution to the child’s social development and emotion regulation, particularly to the child’s later capacity to function adaptively within the social milieu (Feldman, 2016; Kohl et al., 2017, 2018; Abraham and Feldman, 2018). Absence of a paternal caregiver influences the socialization and increases the probability of drug and alcohol abuse, mental illness, poor educational performance and criminal activity of affected children (Franz et al., 1999; Baskerville, 2002; O’Neill, 2002; Erhard and Janig, 2003; Kindler and Grossmann, 2004; Garfield and Isacco, 2006). Also, a variety of clinical studies provide evidence that adolescents living in single-mother homes develop higher levels of delinquency than those raised in dual-parent households (Juby and Farrington, 2001; Demuth and Brown, 2004) and are at greater risk for incarceration (Harper and McLanahan, 2004).
So far there are no systematic analyses of brain functional changes in father-deprived children, which underlines the importance of research in animal models, which—besides, to use functional imaging techniques—also allow to “zoom in” to the microscopic and molecular/epigenetic level to study the impact of paternal care on neuronal and synaptic development. An increasing number of experimental approaches in various biparental rodent species revealed the important role of fathers and bi-parental care in shaping functional neuronal networks in the brain and the associated socioemotional development of their offspring (Braun and Champagne, 2014; Bales and Saltzman, 2016; Saltzman et al., 2017; Feldman et al., 2019; Pohl et al., 2019). These studies compared the developmental trajectories of offspring from biparental and single-mother families, whereas studies investigating possible influences of an additional (male or female) caregiver are rare.
We have introduced the trumpet-tailed rat Octodon degus as an animal model to study developmental processes underlying human psychopathologies in the context of the DOHaD (Developmental Origins of Health and Disease; Hanson and Gluckman, 2014; Heindel et al., 2015). This species is characterized by biparental care that is associated with complex familial structures and an intense social bond between young degus and their parents (Fuchs et al., 2010; Colonnello et al., 2011). Behavioral studies in degus have shown that the father is actively engaged in parent-offspring interactions (Wilson, 1982), including huddling, licking and grooming, and play behavior (Helmeke et al., 2009; Pinkernelle et al., 2009). During the first 3 weeks of life paternal care comprises about 40% of total parent-offspring interactions (Helmeke et al., 2009; Pinkernelle et al., 2009) and it was claimed that degu fathers play a major role as “regulator” of the offspring’s behavioral development (Wilson, 1982). Importantly, after the removal of the father single degu mothers do not compensate for the lack of paternal care by intensifying maternal activities (Helmeke et al., 2009), which creates a socio-emotionally deprived environment in fatherless families. Degus share the principal brain anatomy with common laboratory rodents (Wright and Kern, 1992; Kumazawa-Manita et al., 2013, 2018) and they display superior cognitive functions, such as learning to use a tool to retrieve food (Okanoya et al., 2008). Similar to human babies (De Casper and Fifer, 1980; Fifer and Moon, 1994), newborn degus learn to recognize and to respond to their mothers’ vocalizations within the first days of life (Poeggel and Braun, 1996; Braun and Scheich, 1997; Braun and Poeggel, 2001), and also similar to humans this vocal communication is important for the establishment and maintenance of the emotional attachment to the parents.
Various experimental studies analyzing the development of sensory and motor systems revealed that the developing brain is “experience-expectant” during circumscribed critical periods and that the establishment and refinement of sensory and emotional brain pathways requires an “enriched” stimulating environment during these life periods (Bryan and Riesen, 1989; Rosenzweig and Bennett, 1996; Bock and Braun, 1999a,b; Poeggel et al., 2003; Markham and Greenough, 2004; Bock et al., 2014). Such an enriched socio-emotional environment is normally provided by an adequate and structured parental care. While biparental care can be envisioned as an “enriched” environment for the offspring, being raised by a single caregiver represents an “impoverished” environment, a family setting which in animal studies can be experimentally applied to assess the impact of paternal care on the development of his offspring. The behavioral pathologies observed in father-deprived individuals likely arise from a socio-emotionally impoverished family setting resulting in functional deficits within specific brain circuits. Indeed, the development and functional maturation of brain regions such as the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and the anterior cingulate cortex (ACd) are particularly sensitive towards paternal input as revealed in previous studies (Ovtscharoff et al., 2006; Helmeke et al., 2009; Braun et al., 2011, 2013; Seidel et al., 2011).
One aim of the present study was to address the hypothesis that paternal deprivation delays or permanently retards synaptic connectivity in the brain, particularly in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) of the offspring. Most studies consider paternal absence synonymous with living in a single-parent, non-intact, or mother-headed family, and accordingly, the majority of experimental paternal deprivation studies applied a paradigm in which the father is removed from the family at the birth of his offspring. However, in “real” life an absent father can be replaced by other male or female caregivers, which are integrated into the family setting. Hence, the second aim of this study was to address the question whether the father can be replaced by another female caregiver (in our experiments the “aunt”) who may “buffer” the detrimental effects of paternal deprivation on brain development. Since so far, the majority of animal studies have focused on the consequences of paternal deprivation in male offspring, the third aim of this study was to compare the impact of paternal deprivation on neuronal development in male and female siblings.
Materials and Methods
Animals
The degus used in this study were bred in our colony at the Institute of Biology, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg. They were housed in wire cages (l/w/h: 50 cm/42 cm/67 cm) in temperature (22°C) and humidity (55%) controlled rooms under a 12/12 h light/dark cycle. Freshwater and rodent diet pellets were accessible ad libitum, vegetables were added occasionally. All experiments were performed following the European Community’s Council Directive and according to the German guidelines for the care and use of animals in laboratory research. The experimental protocols were approved by the ethics committee of Saxony-Anhalt.
Experimental Groups
Four weeks after mating a male and female breeding pair the sister of the female (aunt) was introduced to the breeding pair and housed in the same cage. On the day of delivery (postnatal day, PND, 0) the families were assigned to three experimental groups:
Control family (+F group = male and female biparental): after delivery of the pups the aunt was removed from the family, resulting in a bi-parental family in which the pups were raised by the father and mother (Noffspring = 7 males, 5 females, each from different families to prevent litter effects). The data presented for this group include a total of 28 neurons for males and a total of 20 neurons for females. The data presented for this group include a total of 28 neurons for males and a total of 20 neurons for females.
Single mother family (−F group = father-deprived): on the day of delivery the father and the aunt were removed from the home cage, resulting in a single-parent family in which the pups were raised by the mother only (Noffspring = 6 males, 7 females, each from different families to prevent litter effects). The data presented for this group include a total of 24 neurons for males and a total of 28 neurons for females.
Mother-Aunt family (MA group = female biparental): on the day of delivery the father was removed from the family, resulting in a bi-parental family in which the pups were raised by the mother and her sister (aunt; Noffspring = 6 males, 6 females, each from different families to prevent litter effects). The data presented for this group include a total of 24 neurons for males and also a total of 24 neurons for females. All families were group-housed in their home cage until postnatal day 45 (puberty).
Quantitative Neuromorphology
After decapitation, the unfixed brains were impregnated in the Golgi solution for 14 days and embedded in celloidin. One-hundred and fifty micrometre tissue sections were prepared and developed by using a modified Golgi–Cox technique (for methodological details, see Bock et al., 2016). For each hemisphere two pyramidal neurons located in layer II/III of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) comprising the infralimbic (IL) and prelimbic (PL) cortex were analyzed (Figure 1A). The brain region was defined according to the rat brain atlas (Paxinos and Watson, 2004) and the degu brain atlas (Kumazawa-Manita et al., 2018). All neurons were reconstructed at a final magnification of 1,000× using a computer-based neuron tracing system (NEUROLUCIDA®, MicroBright-Field, Williston, VT, USA), which allows the quantitative three-dimensional analysis of complete dendritic trees. For each animal two neurons per hemisphere, that is four neurons per animal, were analyzed. Neurons selected for analysis (representative example in Figure 1B) had to fulfill the following criteria: (1) localization within the boundaries of the vmPFC, (2) uniform and complete staining of apical and basal dendritic trees within the 150 μm section, (3) apical dendrites had to branch regularly into a series of bifurcating branches divided into primary, secondary, tertiary, etc. and (4) sufficient distance from neighboring neurons, glia or blood vessels, which could obscure their morphology. All protrusions, thin, stubby, or mushroom type were counted as spines if they were in direct continuity with the dendritic shaft. No attempt was made to correct for hidden spines (Feldman and Peters, 1979), as the use of visible spine counts for comparison between different experimental conditions had been validated previously (Horner and Arbuthnott, 1991). The following parameters for each reconstructed neuron were quantified: (i) dendritic length in μm; (ii) spine frequency representing the number of visible spines per 10 μm dendritic length; (iii) number of visible spines; and (iv) dendritic complexity. All protrusions, thin, stubby, or mushroom type were counted as spines if they were in direct continuity with the dendritic shaft. The length of the dendritic trees was measured by tracing the entire dendrite in three dimensions while counting dendritic spines. Spine frequency was calculated separately for the apical and basal dendrites of each neuron. For a more detailed analysis, three parallel analysis strategies were performed: (1) To assess whether spine changes are confined to specific areas of the dendritic field, the natural branches (segments) of the apical and basal dendritic trees were numbered consecutively (primary, secondary, tertiary, etc.) from proximal to distal (Bock and Braun, 1999a,b; Bock et al., 2016; Figure 1C). Spine frequency was calculated: (i) as the average for the complete apical or basal dendrite; and (ii) as the average for the individual branching orders (see above). (2) Since it turned out that the most distal dendritic segments showed the most pronounced differences between the rearing groups we applied an additional analysis: the values for each parameter (dendritic length, spine frequency, spine number) were pooled for the 3rd-5th apical branch order or the 2nd–4th basal branch order, respectively. (3) To obtain more detailed information about changes of dendritic complexity, a three-dimensional version of the Sholl analysis (Sholl, 1953) was performed, in which concentric spheres at 50 μm intervals were placed around the soma and the number of intersections between dendrite and Sholl sphere was calculated (Figure 1D). All analyses were conducted by an experimenter who was unaware of the experimental conditions of the animals.
Figure 1
Statistical Analysis
A two-way ANOVA was performed to test for potential differences within the main factors rearing condition (+F, −F, MA) and sex (male, female) and potential interaction of these factors. For a more detailed comparison of the individual experimental groups, a one-way ANOVA for male and female groups was conducted and in case of significance (p ≤ 0.05) a Student-Newman-Keuls-(SNK-) test post hoc tests was applied. The data for each hemisphere were pooled and analyzed separately, resulting in two values per animal. As described above we compared values of dendritic length, spine frequency, and spine number for: (i) complete neurons; and (ii) 3rd–5th order segments for apical dendrites, 2nd–4th order segments for basal dendrites. Also, values for comparison of dendritic complexity were derived from Sholl analysis.
Results
In the present study, we aimed to analyze if growing up without a male caregiver (single mother family, −F group) may affect neuronal morphology in the vmPFC of periadolescent degu pups when compared to pups from a male and female biparental control family (control group). Moreover, to analyze if differences between these two rearing conditions are specific for a male caregiver, we introduced an additional biparental group consisting of two female caregivers (mother/aunt family, MA group). Also, we wanted to test for potential differences between male and female offspring. Thus, we first applied a two-way ANOVA to test for differences between the three rearing conditions, between male and female animals and potential interactions between these main factors. Also, a one-way ANOVA with the subsequent post hoc test was applied separately for male and female offspring to get a more detailed comparison between the individual rearing conditions.
Rearing-Induced Differences in Spine Frequency, Spine Number, Dendritic Length and Complexity
Two-way ANOVA for factors rearing condition and sex revealed several significant effects or strong tendencies for the factor rearing condition and interaction of rearing condition × sex, no significant effects were detected for factor sex (for details see Table 1).
Table 1
| Dendrite | Parameter | Rearing condition | Sex | Rearing condition × sex |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| apical | spine frequency | 0.3 | 0.67 | 0.75 |
| spine number | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.3 | |
| dendritic length | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.3 | |
| dendritic complexity | 0.074 | 0.3 | 0.28 | |
| basal | spine frequency | 0.068 | 0.4 | 0.3 |
| spine number | 0.058 | 0.5 | 0.056 | |
| dendritic length | 0.056 | 0.8 | 0.069 | |
| dendritic complexity | 0.05 | 0.7 | 0.27 | |
| apical pooled values 3rd–5th segments | spine frequency | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.9 |
| spine number | 0.002 | 0.7 | 0.89 | |
| dendritic length | 0.008 | 0.9 | 0.7 | |
| basal pooled values 2nd–4th segments | spine frequency | 0.091 | 0.7 | 0.1 |
| spine number | 0.026 | 0.5 | 0.2 | |
| dendritic length | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
Results of two-way ANOVA for factors rearing, sex, and interaction of rearing condition × sex.
Bold numbers with grey background indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05); numbers in italics indicate a trend towards significance (p < 0.1).
Since two-way ANOVA revealed some evidence for an interaction of rearing conditions × sex (basal spine number and basal dendritic length), we conducted a one-way ANOVA with an SNK posthoc test for males and females separately to test for differences between the individual experimental groups. This analysis revealed that rearing conditions affect neuromorphological parameters and that these effects differ in male and female offspring, as described in detail in the following section.
Male Offspring
Spine frequency: Analysis of vmPFC pyramidal neurons using a one-way ANOVA indicated significant differences in the average spine frequency for the complete basal dendrites between the three treatment groups (p = 0.035). Post hoc test revealed a significantly lower spine frequency of offspring from the single mother (−F) group compared to offspring from the biparental (+F) group (p = 0.034, 16% reduced, Figure 2D). Similarly, analysis for the pooled values of the 2nd to 4th basal dendritic segments indicated a significant difference between the treatment groups (p = 0.019) and the post hoc test revealed a significantly lower spine frequency for the −F group compared to the +F group (p = 0.017, 20% decrease, Figures 2E,F) in this basal segments. Also, the post hoc test showed a tendency towards a lower basal spine frequency in the mother-aunt (MA) group compared to the offspring of the +F group (p = 0.062, 13% decrease, Figures 2E,F). For the apical dendrites, no significant effects in spine frequency were found between the experimental groups (Figures 2A–C). Also, no differences neither for spine number (Figures 2G–L), dendritic length nor for dendritic complexity were observed in male animals.
Figure 2
Female Offspring
Spine frequency: No significant differences for spine frequency were found between the three rearing conditions neither on basal or on apical dendrites (Figures 3A–F).
Figure 3
Spine number: One way ANOVA in female offspring indicated significant differences in the average spine number for the complete basal dendrite between the three treatment groups (p = 0.037). Post hoc analysis revealed reduced spine number in female offspring of the MA group compared to −F offspring (p = 0.031, 35% decrease, Figure 3J). Similarly, analysis for the pooled values of the 2nd to 4th basal dendritic segments indicated a significant difference between the treatment groups (p = 0.012) and the post hoc test revealed a significantly lower spine number for the MA group compared to the +F group (p = 0.015, 36% decrease) as well as for the −F group (p = 0.019, 30% decrease, Figures 3K,L). While no significant effects were observed for the complete apical dendrite (Figure 4A), significant differences between the experimental groups were also observed for the pooled values of 3rd to 5th dendritic segments of apical dendrites (p = 0.025) and the post hoc test revealed a significantly lower number in female animals of the MA group compared to female animals of the +F group (p = 0.026, 26% decrease, Figure 3G) as well as of the −F group (p = 0.035, 27% decrease, Figures 3H,I).
Figure 4
Dendritic length and complexity: One way ANOVA for total basal dendritic length indicated significant differences between the three experimental groups (p = 0.027), and the post hoc test revealed reduced dendritic length in offspring from the MA group compared to offspring from the −F group (p = 0.021, 38% reduction, Figure 4D). Also, analysis for the pooled values of the 2nd to 4th basal dendritic segments indicated a significant difference between the treatment groups (p = 0.006), and the post hoc test revealed for this basal segments reduced dendritic length in the MA group compared to the +F group (p = 0.006, 30% reduction) as well as to the −F group (p = 0.028, 22% reduction, Figures 4E,F). While no significant effects were observed for the entire apical dendrites, one way ANOVA indicated differences for the pooled 3rd to 5th dendritic segments of apical dendrites between the experimental groups (p = 0.04) and the post hoc test revealed significantly reduced length of these apical segments in females from the MA group compared to females from −F group (p = 0.044, 22% reduction) as well as a strong tendency compared to the −F group (p = 0.053, 20% reduction, Figures 4B,C).
For dendritic complexity as analyzed with Sholl analysis ANOVA indicated a difference between the experimental groups in the basal dendrite (p = 0.05) and post hoc analysis revealed reduced basal dendritic complexity in the MA female group compared to the −F female group (p = 0.039, 36% reduction, Figures 4I,J). Also, for dendritic complexity of apical dendrites, ANOVA indicated a difference between the female experimental groups (p = 0.018) and the post hoc test revealed a reduction apical dendritic complexity in the MA group compared to the +F group (p = 0.024, 28% reduction) as well as to the −F group (p = 0.023, 24% reduction, Figures 4G,H). Results for dendritic complexity are illustrated as representative dendrograms and reconstructions of representative pyramidal neurons in Figure 5 (dendrograms Figures 5A,B; representative reconstructions Figure 5C).
Figure 5
Discussion
The target area of the present study, the vmPFC, is implicated in various behavioral aspects and specifically related to the control of socio-emotional behavior, behavioral flexibility, and cognitive functions. Although the homology of vmPFC subregions between humans and rodents is still under debate, it is important to note that the vmPFC is a key modulatory area of specific cortical and subcortical networks that include the amygdala, hippocampus, bed nucleus of stria terminalis, periaqueductal grey, anterior cingulate cortex and nucleus accumbens (Ko, 2017; Hiser and Koenigs, 2018). Previous studies in Octodon degus revealed that growing up in fatherless family results in various alterations of neuronal networks, which are indicative of a shift in homeostatic synaptic plasticity, i.e., the balance of excitatory and inhibitory activity in the prefrontal cortex. This view is supported by findings demonstrating that reduced excitatory input onto neurons in the PFC (reflected by decreased spine density and/or number) is paralleled by an increase in the density of different subtypes of inhibitory interneurons in the OFC as well as in the vmPFC (PL/IL; Braun et al., 2011). Although it is premature, without behavioral correlates indicative for prefrontal dysfunction, to offer a functional interpretation for the reduced synaptic density in father-deprived male offspring, it is tempting to speculate that these neuroanatomical changes in response to paternal deprivation might indicate that prefrontal regions may become hypofunctional. In support for this interpretation, we observed in degu pups, which were repeatedly separated from their parents and family during the first 3 weeks of life, that they display decreased metabolic brain activity in several brain areas including prefrontal cortical areas such as ACd, OFC as well as the PL and IL (Bock et al., 2017). This finding matches observations of functional imaging studies, which revealed that children suffering from early neglect and emotional deprivation display prefrontal hypofunction (Chugani et al., 2001).
Paternal Care Influences Dendritic and Synaptic Development
So far, only a few studies compared the effect of paternal care on the brain and behavioral development in male and female offspring. Although on the “mathematical level” the two-way ANOVA revealed no clear significant effects for the factor sex, a trend for interaction between rearing conditions and sex was detected. The comparison of individual groups—reflecting the “biological” view—revealed that paternal care affects dendrites and spine synapses in the vmPFC differently in male and female offspring. While in paternally deprived male offspring spine frequency on basal dendrites was reduced without changes in dendritic length and complexity, this effect was completely absent in paternally deprived females. In contrast, reductions of spine number and dendritic length and complexity in the mother/aunt group were restricted to female offspring, whereas male offspring appeared not to be affected by this rearing condition (see below). Sex-specific consequences of paternal deprivation have also been observed in other species, where either males or females were more severely affected. Moreover, the impact of paternal deprivation on brain development of his offspring is not confined to degus but has also been observed in other biparental rodents and non-human primates, which suggests that similar neuronal changes may occur in the human brain in response to paternal deprivation. For instance, electrophysiological studies in the mPFC of California mice observed lower firing rates of low-spiking pyramidal neurons in father-deprived females compared to biparentally raised females, whereas no significant differences in basal firing rates of both low-spiking and high-spiking neurons were seen in father-deprived and biparentally raised males (Bambico et al., 2015). Paternal deprivation-induced neuronal changes have also been reported in limbic brain regions, which are connected to the mPFC, including the hippocampal formation. In father-deprived prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) glucocorticoid receptor β (GRβ) protein expression was elevated in the hippocampus of females, increased corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor 2 (CRHR2) protein expression was observed in the hippocampus of males, while in both sexes paternal deprivation resulted in decreased hippocampal CRHR2 mRNA (Tabbaa et al., 2017). A recent study in the biparental mandarin vole demonstrated that pre-weaning paternal deprivation at postnatal days 14–21 reduced neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus, predominantly in female offspring (Wu et al., 2014), and only female offspring showed decreased expression of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) and the glucocorticoid receptor (NR3C1; Wu et al., 2014). In contrast, decreased dendritic spine density was observed in the dentate gyrus of both males and females (He et al., 2018).
A Female Caregiver Cannot “Buffer” the Neuronal Consequences of Paternal Deprivation
Most experimental studies in bi-parental non-human species apply paternal deprivation paradigms, where the father is removed from the social unit. These studies demonstrate that the absence of the father affects various behavioral traits in the progeny, including anxiety, aggression, social behavior and response to reward (Bester-Meredith and Marler, 2003; Frazier et al., 2006; McGraw and Young, 2010; Wang et al., 2012; Yu et al., 2012; Birnie et al., 2013). When interpreting findings from paternal deprivation studies in animal models it has, however, to be kept in mind that the observed consequences on the brain and behavioral development might not be specific to the absence of a male caregiver but might rather be due to single-parent rearing conditions. This question was experimentally addressed in our study by replacing the father with another female caregiver (the sister of the dam, i.e., the “aunt”) resulting in a female biparental family. Our results revealed that a female caregiver cannot protect from or compensate for the neuronal changes induced by growing-up in a fatherless environment, but rather induces additional neuronal changes, particularly in the vmPFC of female offspring. Again, it is tempting to speculate that these changes might be indicative of prefrontal dysfunction. However, the socio-emotional environment provided by a female biparental family remains to be investigated in more detail, to assess whether it represents an “impoverished” or an overprotective or stressful environment.
Statements
Data availability statement
The datasets generated for this study are available on request to the corresponding author.
Ethics statement
The animal study was reviewed and approved by Ethics committee of Saxony-Anhalt, Germany.
Author contributions
TS conducted 3D analysis of stained neurons, statistical analysis, preparation of figures and was involved in writing parts of the mansucript. JB did brain preparations, guided histological staining, 3D analysis and statistics and wrote signifcant parts of the manuscript. KB led the project, planned the experimental design, guided analysis including statistics, wrote signficant parts of the manuscript and did final editing of the submitted draft.
Funding
This work was supported by German-Israeli Foundation for Scientific Research and Development.
Acknowledgments
We would like to appreciate the expert technical assistance of Ute Kreher with the histological procedures and of Julia Heinzelmann with manuscript editing.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
AbrahamE.FeldmanR. (2018). The neurobiology of human allomaternal care; implications for fathering, coparenting and children’s social development. Physiol. Behav.193, 25–34. 10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.12.034
2
BalesK. L.SaltzmanW. (2016). Fathering in rodents: neurobiological substrates and consequences for offspring. Horm. Behav.77, 249–259. 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2015.05.021
3
BambicoF. R.LacosteB.HattanP. R.GobbiG. (2015). Father absence in the monogamous california mouse impairs social behavior and modifies dopamine and glutamate synapses in the medial prefrontal cortex. Cereb. Cortex25, 1163–1175. 10.1093/cercor/bht310
4
BaskervilleS. (2002). The politics of fatherhood. Pol. Sci. Polit.35, 695–699. 10.1017/S1049096502001191
5
Bester-MeredithJ. K.MarlerC. A. (2003). Vasopressin and the transmission of paternal behavior across generations in mated, cross-fostered Peromyscus mice. Behav. Neurosci.117, 455–463. 10.1037/0735-7044.117.3.455
6
BirnieA. K.TaylorJ. H.CavanaughJ.FrenchJ. A. (2013). Quality of maternal and paternal care predicts later stress reactivity in the cooperatively-breeding marmoset (Callithrix geoffroyi). Psychoneuroendocrinology38, 3003–3014. 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.08.011
7
BockJ.BraunK. (1999a). Blockade of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor activation suppresses learning-induced synaptic elimination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A96, 2485–2490. 10.1073/pnas.96.5.2485
8
BockJ.BraunK. (1999b). Filial imprinting in domestic chicks is associated with spine pruning in the associative area, dorsocaudal neostriatum. Eur. J. Neurosci.11, 2566–2570. 10.1046/j.1460-9568.1999.00713.x
9
BockJ.BreuerS.PoeggelG.BraunK. (2017). Early life stress induces attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)-like behavioral and brain metabolic dysfunctions: functional imaging of methylphenidate treatment in a novel rodent model. Brain Struct. Funct.222, 765–780. 10.1007/s00429-016-1244-7
10
BockJ.PoeschelJ.SchindlerJ.BörnerF.Shachar-DadonA.FerdmanN.et al. (2016). Transgenerational sex-specific impact of preconception stress on the developmentof dendritic spines and dendritic length in the medial prefrontal cortex. Brain Struct. Funct.221, 855–863. 10.1007/s00429-014-0940-4
11
BockJ.RetherK.GrögerN.XieL.BraunK. (2014). Perinatal programming of emotional brain circuits: an integrative view from systems to molecules. Front. Neurosci.8:11. 10.3389/fnins.2014.00011
12
BraunK.ChampagneF. A. (2014). Paternal influences on offspring development: behavioural and epigenetic pathways. J. Neuroendocrinol.26, 697–706. 10.1111/jne.12174
13
BraunK.PoeggelG. (2001). Recognition of mothers voice evokes metabolic activation in the medial prefrontal cortex and thalamus of Octodon degus pups. Neuroscience103, 861–864. 10.1016/s0306-4522(01)00074-4
14
BraunS.ScheichH. (1997). Influence of experience on the representation of the ‘mothering call’ in frontoparietal and auditory cortex of pups of the rodent Octodon degus: FDG mapping. J. Comp. Physiol. A181, 697–709. 10.1007/s003590050151
15
BraunK.SeidelK.HoletschkaR.GroegerN.PoeggelG. (2013). Paternal deprivation alters the development of catecholaminergic innervation in the prefrontal cortex and related limbic brain regions. Brain Struct. Funct.218, 859–872. 10.1007/s00429-012-0434-1
16
BraunK.SeidelK.WeigelS.RoskiC.PoeggelG. (2011). Paternal deprivationalters region- and age-specific interneuron expression patterns in the biparental rodent, Octodon degus. Cereb. Cortex21, 1532–1546. 10.1093/cercor/bhq208
17
BryanG. K.RiesenA. H. (1989). Deprived somatosensory-motor experience in stumptailed monkey neocortex: dendritic spine density and dendritic branching of layer IIIB pyramidal cells. J. Comp. Neurol.286, 208–217. 10.1002/cne.902860206
18
ChuganiH. T.BehenM. E.MuzikO.JuhászC.NagyF.ChuganiD. C. (2001). Local brainfunctional activity following early deprivation: a study of postinstitutionalized Romanian orphans. NeuroImage14, 1290–1301. 10.1006/nimg.2001.0917
19
ColonnelloV.IacobucciP.FuchsT.NewberryR. C.PankseppJ. (2011). Octodon degus. A useful animal model for social-affective neuroscience research: basic description of separation distress, social attachments and play. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.35, 1854–1863. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.03.014
20
De CasperA. J.FiferW. P. (1980). Of human bonding: newborns prefer their mothers’ voices. Science208, 1174–1176. 10.1126/science.7375928
21
DemuthS.BrownS. L. (2004). Family structure, family processes and adolescent delinquency: the significance of parental absence versus parental gender. J. Res. Crime Delinq.41, 58–81. 10.1177/0022427803256236
22
ErhardR.JanigH. (2003). Folgen der Vaterentbehrung: Eine Literaturstudie.Wien: BMSG.
23
FeldmanR. (2016). The neurobiology of mammalian parenting and the biosocial context of human caregiving. Horm. Behav.77, 3–17. 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2015.10.001
24
FeldmanR.BraunK.ChampagneF. A. (2019). The neural mechanisms and consequences of paternal caregiving. Nat. Rev. Neurosci.20, 205–224. 10.1038/s41583-019-0124-6
25
FeldmanM. L.PetersA. (1979). A technique for estimating total spine numbers on golgi-impregnated dendrites. J. Comp. Neurol.188, 527–542. 10.1002/cne.901880403
26
FiferW. P.MoonC. M. (1994). The role of mother’s voice in the organization of brain function in the newborn. Acta Paediatr. Suppl.397, 86–93. 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1994.tb13270.x
27
FranzM.SchmitzN.LieberzK.SchepankH. (1999). Wenn der Vater fehlt. epidemiologische befunde zur bedeutung früher abwesenheit des vaters für die psychische gesundheit im späteren Leben/The missingfather. Epidemiological findings on the significance of early absence of the father for mental health in later life. Z. Psychosom. Med. Psychother.45, 260–278. 10.13109/zptm.1999.45.3.260
28
FrazierC. R.TrainorB. C.CravensC. J.WhitneyT. K.MarlerC. A. (2006). Paternal behaviour influences development of aggression and vasopressin expression in male California mouse offspring. Horm. Behav.50, 699–707. 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2006.06.035
29
FuchsT.IacobucciP.MacKinnonK. M.PankseppJ. (2010). Infant-mother recognition in asocial rodent (Octodon degus). J. Comp. Psychol.124, 166–175. 10.1037/a0018704
30
GarfieldC. F.IsaccoA. (2006). Fathers and the well-child visit. Pediatrics117, e637–e645. 10.1542/peds.2005-1612
31
GlynnL. M.BaramT. Z. (2019). The influence of unpredictable, fragmented parental signals on the developing brain. Front. Neuroendocrinol.53:100736. 10.1016/j.yfrne.2019.01.002
32
HansonM. A.GluckmanP. D. (2014). Early developmental conditioning of later health and disease: physiology or pathophysiology?Physiol. Rev.94, 1027–1076. 10.1152/physrev.00029.2013
33
HarperC. C.McLanahanS. S. (2004). Father absence and youth incarceration. J. Res. Adolesc.14, 369–397. 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2004.00079.x
34
HeZ.GuoQ.YangY.WangL.ZhangS.YuanW.et al. (2018). Pre-weaning paternal deprivation impairs social recognition and alters hippocampal neurogenesis and spine density in adult mandarin voles. Neurobiol. Learn Mem.155, 452–462. 10.1016/j.nlm.2018.09.006
35
HeindelJ. J.BalbusJ.BirnbaumL.Brune-DrisseM. N.GrandjeanP.GrayK.et al. (2015). Developmental origins of health and disease: integrating environmental influences. Endocrinology156, 3416–3421. 10.1210/EN.2015-1394
36
HelmekeC.SeidelK.PoeggelG.BredyT.AbrahamA.BraunK. (2009). Paternal deprivation during infancy results in dendrite- and time-specific changes of dendritic development and spine formation in the orbitofrontal cortex of the biparental rodent Octodon degus. Neuroscience163, 790–798. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.07.008
37
HiserJ.KoenigsM. (2018). The multifaceted role of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex in emotion, decision making, social cognition and psychopathology. Biol. Psychiatry83, 638–647. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.10.030
38
HornerC. H.ArbuthnottE. (1991). Methods of estimation of spine density—are spines evenly distributed throughout the dendritic field?J. Anat.177, 179–184.
39
JubyH.FarringtonD. P. (2001). Disentangling the link between disrupted families and delinquency sociodemography, ethnicity and risk behaviours. Br. J. Criminol.41, 22–40. 10.1093/bjc/41.1.22
40
KindlerH.GrossmannK. (2004). “Vater-Kind-Bindung und die Rolle der Väter in den ersten Lebensjahren ihrer Kinder,” in Frühe Bindung. Entstehung und Entwicklung, ed. AhnertL. (München, Basel: Ernst Reinhard Verlag), 240–255.
41
KoJ. (2017). Neuroanatomical substrates of rodent social behavior: the medial prefrontal cortex and its projection patterns. Front. Neural. Circuits11:41. 10.3389/fncir.2017.00041
42
KohlJ.AutryA. E.DulacC. (2017). The neurobiology of parenting: a neural circuit perspective. Bioessays39, 1–11. 10.1002/bies.201600159
43
KohlJ.BabayanB. M.RubinsteinN. D.AutryA. E.Marin-RodriguezB.KapoorV.et al. (2018). Functional circuitarchitecture underlying parental behaviour. Nature556, 326–331. 10.1038/s41586-018-0027-0
44
Kumazawa-ManitaP. N.HashikawaP. T.IrikiD. A. (2018). The 3D stereotaxic brain atlas of the degu. Brain Sci.231, 65–74.
45
Kumazawa-ManitaN.KatayamaM.HashikawaT.IrikiA. (2013). Three dimensional reconstruction of brain structures of the rodent Octodon degus: a brain atlas constructed by combining histological and magnetic resonance images. Exp. Brain Res.231, 65–74. 10.1007/s00221-013-3667-1
46
MaccariS.KrugersH. J.Morley-FletcherS.SzyfM.BruntonP. J. (2014). The consequences of early-life adversity: neurobiological, behavioural and epigenetic adaptations. J. Neuroendocrinol.26, 707–723. 10.1111/jne.12175
47
MarkhamJ. A.GreenoughW. T. (2004). Experience-driven brain plasticity: beyond the synapse. Neuron Glia Biol.1, 351–363. 10.1017/s1740925x05000219
48
McGrawL. A.YoungL. J. (2010). The prairie vole: an emerging model organism for understanding the social brain. Trends Neurosci.33, 103–109. 10.1016/j.tins.2009.11.006
49
MeaneyM. J. (2001). Maternal care, gene expression and the transmission of individual differences in stress reactivity across generations. Annu. Rev. Neurosci.24, 1161–1192. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.1161
50
O’NeillR. (2002). Experiments in living: the fatherless family. Civitas9, 1–20. Available online at: https://fkce.wordpress.com/2002/09/01/4/.
51
OkanoyaK.TokimotoN.KumazawaN.HiharaS.IrikiA. (2008). Tool- use training in a species of rodent: the emergence of an optimal motor strategy and functional understanding. PLoS One3:e1860. 10.1371/journal.pone.0001860
52
OvtscharoffW.Jr.HelmekeC.BraunK. (2006). Lack of paternal care affects synapticdevelopment in the anterior cingulate cortex. Brain Res.1116, 58–63. 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.07.106
53
PaxinosG.WatsonC. (2004). The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates.5th Edn.New York, NY: Elsevier.
54
PinkernelleJ.AbrahamA.SeidelK.BraunK. (2009). Paternal deprivation induces dendritic and synaptic changes and hemispheric asymmetry of pyramidal neurons in the somatosensory cortex. Dev. Neurobiol.69, 663–673. 10.1002/dneu.20726
55
PoeggelG.BraunK. (1996). Early auditory filial learning in degus (Octodon degus): behavioral and autoradiographic studies. Brain Res.743, 162–170. 10.1016/s0006-8993(96)01039-6
56
PoeggelG.HelmekeC.AbrahamA.SchwabeT.FriedrichP.BraunK. (2003). Juvenile emotional experience alters synaptic composition in the rodent cortex, hippocampus and lateral amygdala. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A100, 16137–16142. 10.1073/pnas.2434663100
57
PohlT. T.YoungL. J.BoschO. J. (2019). Lost connections: oxytocin and theneural, physiological and behavioral consequences of disrupted relationships. Int. J. Psychophysiol.136, 54–63. 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2017.12.011
58
RosenzweigM. R.BennettE. L. (1996). Psychobiology of plasticity: effects of training and experience on brain and behavior. Behav. Brain Res.78, 57–65. 10.1016/0166-4328(95)00216-2
59
SaltzmanW.HarrisB. N.De JongT. R.Perea-RodriguezJ. P.HorrellN. D.ZhaoM.et al. (2017). Paternal care in biparental rodents: intra-and interindividual variation. Integr. Comp. Biol.57, 589–602. 10.1093/icb/icx047
60
SeidelK.PoeggelG.HoletschkaR.HelmekeC.BraunK. (2011). Paternal deprivation affects the development of corticotrophin-releasing factor-expressing neurones in prefrontal cortex, amygdala and hippocampus of the biparental Octodon degus. J. Neuroendocrinol.23, 1166–1176. 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2011.02208.x
61
ShollD. A. (1953). Dendritic organization in the neurons of the visual and motor cortices of the cat. J. Anat.87, 387–406.
62
TabbaaM.LeiK.LiuY.WangZ. (2017). Paternal deprivation affects social behaviors and neurochemical systems in the offspring of socially monogamous prairie voles. Neuroscience343, 284–297. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.12.011
63
WangJ.TaiF.YanX.YuP. (2012). Paternal deprivation alters play-fighting, serum corticosterone and the expression of hypothalamic vasopressin and oxytocin in juvenile male mandarin voles. J. Comp. Physiol. A Neuroethol. Sens. Neural. Behav. Physiol.198, 787–796. 10.1007/s00359-012-0748-8
64
WilsonS. C. (1982). Contact-promoting behavior, social development and relationship with parents in sibling juvenile degus (Octodon degus). Dev. Psychobiol.15, 257–268. 10.1002/dev.420150309
65
WrightJ. W.KernM. D. (1992). Stereotaxic atlas of the brain of Octodon degus. J. Morphol.214, 299–320. 10.1002/jmor.1052140306
66
WuR.SongZ.WangS.ShuiL.TaiF.QiaoX.et al. (2014). Early paternal deprivation alters levels of hippocampal brain-derived neurotrophic factor and glucocorticoid receptor and serum corticosterone and adrenocorticotropin in a sexspecific way in socially monogamous mandarin voles. Neuroendocrinology100, 119–128. 10.1159/000366441
67
YuP.AnS.TaiF.ZhangX.HeF.WangJ.et al. (2012). The effects of neonatal paternal deprivation on pair bonding, NAcc dopamine receptor mRNA expression and serum corticosterone in mandarin voles. Horm. Behav.61, 669–677. 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2012.02.028
68
ZhangT. Y.LabontéB.WenX. L.TureckiG.MeaneyM. J. (2013). Epigenetic mechanisms for the early environmental regulation of hippocampal glucocorticoid receptor gene expression in rodents and humans. Neuropsychopharmacology38, 111–123. 10.1038/npp.2012.149
Summary
Keywords
dendritic spines, prefrontal cortex, paternal deprivation, family structure, sex difference, pyramidal neuron
Citation
de Schultz T, Bock J and Braun K (2020) Paternal Deprivation and Female Biparental Family Rearing Induce Dendritic and Synaptic Changes in Octodon degus: I. Medial Prefrontal Cortex. Front. Synaptic Neurosci. 12:38. doi: 10.3389/fnsyn.2020.00038
Received
22 January 2020
Accepted
31 July 2020
Published
04 September 2020
Volume
12 - 2020
Edited by
Menahem Segal, Weizmann Institute of Science, Israel
Reviewed by
Atsuo Fukuda, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Japan; Raphael Lamprecht, University of Haifa, Israel
Updates
Copyright
© 2020 de Schultz, Bock and Braun.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Katharina Braun katharina.braun@ovgu.de
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.