EDITORIAL article

Front. Syst. Neurosci., 06 March 2015

Volume 9 - 2015 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2015.00035

The effects of hearing loss on neural processing and plasticity

  • 1. Volen National Center for Complex Systems, Brandeis University Waltham, MA, USA

  • 2. Department of Otolaryngology, Washington University in St. Louis St. Louis, MO, USA

Hearing loss—ranging from mild to severe—afflicts large numbers of individuals of all ages. It is estimated that 40–50% of adults over the age of 65 years have some degree of significant hearing loss, with this figure rising to 83% of those over the age of 70 (Cruickshanks et al., 1998). This makes hearing loss the third most prevalent chronic medical condition among older adults after arthritis and hypertension (Lethbridge-Cejku et al., 2004). Recent years have seen increasing appreciation for the downstream consequences of reduced hearing acuity, even when perception itself has been successful. In the case of speech, these consequences include negative effects of perceptual effort on encoding what has been heard in memory (Rabbitt, 1991; Surprenant, 1999; Pichora-Fuller, 2003; McCoy et al., 2005; Cousins et al., 2014) and comprehension of sentences whose processing is resource-demanding because of complex syntax (Wingfield et al., 2006). Beyond these short-term effects, there also appear to be small but statistically significant correlations between hearing acuity and the appearance of all-cause dementia (Gates et al., 2011; Lin et al., 2011b) and performance on standardized cognitive tests in non-demented individuals (Lin et al., 2011a). Strikingly, the relationship between hearing acuity and cognitive ability holds even when adjusted for sex, age, education, diabetes, smoking history, and hypertension (Lin, 2011; Lin et al., 2011a; Humes et al., 2013a).

The effects of impaired hearing thus goes beyond difficulty in speech recognition. Speech comprehension in the face of mild-to-moderate hearing loss modifies patterns of neural activation in BOLD imaging, and analyses of structural MRI images have shown that poor hearing acuity is associated with reduced gray matter volume in auditory cortex (Peelle et al., 2011; Eckert et al., 2012; Lin et al., 2014). Findings such as these indicate a biological link between sensory stimulation and cortical integrity, consistent with animal models demonstrating neural reorganization when sensory input is disrupted. In humans, these effects on auditory cortex may have cascading influences throughout the hierarchical set of regions involved in speech processing (Davis and Johnsrude, 2003; Rauschecker and Scott, 2009; Peelle et al., 2010).

Understanding sensory-cognitive interactions represents an important research challenge, especially when changes in hearing acuity are compounded by declines in working memory resources and executive function that often occur in adult aging. One must also note claims of an increase in hearing loss among young adults (Shargorodsky et al., 2010), many of whom remain unaware of their hearing loss and the consequences of perceptual effort on cognitive performance (Widen et al., 2009; Le Prell et al., 2011). At the level of remediation, surgically placed cochlear implants have seen increasing use, to include use with older adults, when hearing acuity has declined to a point where standard hearing aids no longer yield significant benefit (Dillon et al., 2013). This emerging technology will call increasingly on the translational potential of basic research in auditory physiology currently active in human and animal studies.

This research topic presents a collection of original articles that explore the cognitive and neural consequences of hearing loss, including basic processes carried out in the auditory periphery, computations in subcortical nuclei and primary auditory cortex, and higher-level processes such as those involved in human speech perception. Together, these articles form a compelling body of work demonstrating numerous ways in which brain structure, neural function, and behavior are impacted by hearing loss.

We begin with seven review and theory articles. Rönnberg and coauthors offer a timely update of the Ease of Language Understanding (ELU) model in which they stress the importance of working memory for online spoken language processing, especially under poor listening conditions (Rönnberg et al., 2013). Heald and Nusbaum (2014) continue this theme, arguing that even early-stage speech recognition is an attentionally-guided active process and not as automatic as some have suggested. Review articles by Guediche et al. (2014) and by Keating and King (2013) stress the flexibility in the perceptual system that allows for adaptation to auditory perturbations. Eggermont (2013) and by Butler and Lomber (2013) focus primarily on animal models to explore effects of experience on auditory processing, while Bharadwaj et al. (2014) review human and animals studies demonstrating that precision in temporal coding may be poor even when hearing thresholds are normal. Taken together, these papers emphasize the view that auditory detection thresholds give only a limited picture of auditory and auditory-cortical processing.

Additional evidence bearing on plasticity and development appears in six research articles using animal models. Gay et al. (2014) and Kang et al. (2014) explore mechanisms underlying interactions between early conductive hearing loss and effects on detection tasks in adulthood, while Kamal et al. (2013) focus on impact and reversibility of noise exposure effects in auditory cortex. Huetz et al. (2014) examine functional modification to cortical cells in response to moderate hearing loss. Henry et al. (2014) report effects of noise-induced sensorineural hearing loss on complex temporal coding, and Kral et al. (2013) examine the implications of hemisphere asymmetries in cortical adaptation to unilateral hearing loss in development.

Studies in human listeners reveal many of the same aspects of plasticity in the perceptual system as seen in animal models. Avivi-Reich et al. (2014) illustrate the dynamic interaction between bottom-up input and top-down cognitive factors when older adults are challenged by listening to a target speaker in a background of multiple speakers and when listening in a second language. Mishra et al. (2013) continue this theme with an emphasis on the role of selective attention when listening to speech in noise. Humes et al. (2013b) examine individual difference factors that influence successful speech comprehension beyond peripheral hearing acuity. The value of in-depth studies of a single individual is illustrated by Firszt et al. (2013) who report neural and performance changes in an adult patient following successful surgery for a congenital unilateral hearing loss. Anderson et al. (2013) offer additional evidence bearing on plasticity in the sensory-cognitive system in a study of compensatory training through directed attention in hearing impaired older adults. McGettigan et al. (2014) address learning-related changes in speech recognition using noise-vocoded speech to simulate the acoustic input available from a cochlear implant. Finally, Ihlefeld et al. (2014) focus their research article on factors relating to cochlear implant recipients' decrements in the use of interaural time differences for localizing sound sources in space.

Considerable advances have been made using a number of human brain imaging techniques, as illustrated by a final eight articles in this collection that have examined effects of hearing loss using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) to assess white matter integrity (Rachakonda et al., 2014), functional MRI to reveal patterns of neural reorganization and compensatory cognitive control with hearing loss and aging (Erb and Obleser, 2013; Husain et al., 2014), patterns of neural responses using electroencephalograph (EEG) recordings from scalp electrodes (Becker et al., 2013; Campbell and Sharma, 2013; Catz and Noreña, 2013; Tremblay et al., 2014) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) to examine contributory effects of reduced inhibitory control in older adults with hearing impairment (Alain, 2014).

Together, these collected articles reflect a valuable sample of current approaches to our understanding of the effects of hearing loss on neural and perceptual processing. A theme that emerges from both the human and animal studies in this collection is that of an adaptive plasticity in the sensory, perceptual and cognitive systems that regulates performance in the face of often seriously degraded input. Challenges for future research include better understanding the link between neural consequences of hearing loss and other modifications of acoustic input (Van Engen and Peelle, 2014) and a more direct linking of hearing ability, brain structure, neural function, and behavior.

Statements

Acknowledgments

The preparation of this manuscript was aided by NIH grants R01AG019714 and R01AG03890 from the National Institute on Aging and The Dana Foundation.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  • 1

    AlainC. (2014). Effects of age-related hearing loss and background noise on neuromagnetic activity from auditory cortex. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 8:8. 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00008

  • 2

    AndersonS.White-SchwochT.ChoiH. J.KrausN. (2013). Training changes processing of speech cues in older adults with hearing loss. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 7:97. 10.3389/fnsys.2013.00097

  • 3

    Avivi-ReichM.DanemanM.SchneiderB. A. (2014). How age and linguistic competence alter the interplay of perceptual and cognitive factors when listening to conversations in a noisy environment. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 8:21. 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00021

  • 4

    BeckerR.PefkouM.MichelC. M.Hervais-AdelmanA. G. (2013). Left temporal alpha-band activity reflects single word intelligibility. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 7:121. 10.3389/fnsys.2013.00121

  • 5

    BharadwajH. M.VerhulstS.ShaheenL.LibermanM. C.Shinn-CunninghamB. G. (2014). Cochlear neuropathy and the coding of supra-threshold sound. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 8:26. 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00026

  • 6

    ButlerB. E.LomberS. G. (2013). Functional and structural changes throughout the auditory system following congenital and early-onset deafness: implications for hearing restoration. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 7:92. 10.3389/fnsys.2013.00092

  • 7

    CampbellJ.SharmaA. (2013). Compensatory changes in cortical resource allocation in adults with hearing loss. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 7:71. 10.3389/fnsys.2013.00071

  • 8

    CatzN.NoreñaA. (2013). Enhanced representation of spectral contrasts in the primary auditory cortex. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 7:21. 10.3389/fnsys.2013.00021

  • 9

    CousinsK. A. Q.DarH.WingfieldA.MillerP. (2014). Acoustic masking disrupts time-dependent mechanisms of memory encoding in word-list recall. Mem. Cogn. 42, 622–638. 10.3758/s13421-013-0377-7

  • 10

    CruickshanksK. J.WileyT. L.TweedT. S.KleinB. E.KleinR.Mares-PerlmanJ. A.et al. (1998). Prevalence of hearing loss in older adults in Beaver Dam, Wisconsin: the epidemiology of hearing loss study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 148, 879–886. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009713

  • 11

    DavisM. H.JohnsrudeI. S. (2003). Hierarchical processing in spoken language comprehension. J. Neurosci. 23, 3423–3431.

  • 12

    DillonM. T.BussE.AdunkaM. C.KingE. R.PillsburyH. C.AdunkaO. F.et al. (2013). Long-term speech perception in elderly cochlear implant users. JAMA Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 139, 279–283. 10.1001/jamaoto.2013.1814

  • 13

    EckertM. A.CuteS. L.VadenK. I.Jr.KuchinskyS. E.DubnoJ. R. (2012). Auditory cortex signs of age-related hearing loss. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 13, 703–713. 10.1007/s10162-012-0332-5

  • 14

    EggermontJ. J. (2013). On the similarities and differences of non-traumatic sound exposure during the critical period and in adulthood. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 7:12. 10.3389/fnsys.2013.00012

  • 15

    ErbJ.ObleserJ. (2013). Upregulation of cognitive control networks in older adults' speech comprehension. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 7:116. 10.3389/fnsys.2013.00116

  • 16

    FirsztJ. B.ReederR. M.HoldenT. A.BurtonH.CholeR. A. (2013). Changes in auditory perceptions and cortex resulting from hearing recovery after extended congenital unilateral hearing loss. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 7:108. 10.3389/fnsys.2013.00108

  • 17

    GatesG. A.AndersonM. L.McCurryS. M.FeeneyM. P.LarsonE. B. (2011). Central auditory dysfunction as a harbinger of Alzheimer dementia. Arch. Orolaryngol. 137, 390–395. 10.1001/archoto.2011.28

  • 18

    GayJ. D.VoytenkoS. V.GalazyukA. V.RosenM. J. (2014). Developmental hearing loss impairs signal detection in noise: putative central mechanisms. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 8:162. 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00162

  • 19

    GuedicheS.BlumsteinS.FiezJ. A.HoltL. L. (2014). Speech perception under adverse conditions: insights from behavioral, computational and neuroscience research. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 7:126. 10.3389/fnsys.2013.00126

  • 20

    HealdS.NusbaumH. C. (2014). Speech perception as an active cognitive process. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 8:35. 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00035

  • 21

    HenryK. S.KaleS.HeinzM. G. (2014). Noise-induced hearing loss increases the temporal precision of complex envelope coding by auditory-nerve fibers. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 8:20. 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00020

  • 22

    HuetzC.GuedinM.EdelineJ.-M. (2014). Neural correlates of moderate hearing loss: time course of response changes in the primary auditory cortex of awake guinea-pigs. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 8:65. 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00065

  • 23

    HumesL. E.BuseyT. A.CraigJ.Kewley-PortD. (2013a). Are age-related changes in cognitive function driven by age-related changes in sensory processing?Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 75, 508–524. 10.3758/s13414-012-0406-9

  • 24

    HumesL. E.KiddG. R.LentzJ. J. (2013b). Auditory and cognitive factors underlying individual differences in aided speech-understanding among older adults. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 7:55. 10.3389/fnsys.2013.00055

  • 25

    HusainF. T.Carpenter-ThompsonJ. R.SchmidtS. A. (2014). The effect of mild-to-moderate hearing loss on auditory and emotion processing networks. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 8:10. 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00010

  • 26

    IhlefeldA.KanA.LitovskyR. Y. (2014). Across-frequency combination of interaural time difference in bilateral cochlear implant listeners. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 8:22. 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00022

  • 27

    KamalB. S.HolmanC.de Villers-SidaniE. (2013). Shaping the aging brain: role of auditory input patterns in the emergence of auditory cortical impairments. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 7:52. 10.3389/fnsys.2013.00052

  • 28

    KangR.SarroE.SanesD. (2014). Auditory training during development mitigates a hearing loss-induced perceptual deficit. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 8:49. 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00049

  • 29

    KeatingP.KingA. J. (2013). Developmental plasticity of spatial hearing following asymmetric hearing loss: context-dependent cue integration and its clinical implications. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 7:123. 10.3389/fnsys.2013.00123

  • 30

    KralA.HeidS.HubkaP.TilleinJ. (2013). Unilateral hearing during development: hemispheric specificity in plastic reorganizations. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 7:93. 10.3389/fnsys.2013.00093

  • 31

    Le PrellC. G.HensleyB. N.CampbellK. C. M.HallJ. W.GuireK. (2011). Evidence of hearing loss in a ‘normally-hearing’ college-student population. Int. J. Audiol. 50, S21–S31. 10.3109/14992027.2010.540722

  • 32

    Lethbridge-CejkuM.SchillerJ. S.BernadelL. (2004). Summary health statistics for U.S. adults: national health inverview survey, 2002. Vital Health Stat. 10, 1–151.

  • 33

    LinF. R. (2011). Hearing loss and cognition among older adults in the United States. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 66A, 1131–1136. 10.1093/gerona/glr115

  • 34

    LinF. R.FerrucciL.AnY.GohJ. O.DoshiJ.MetterE. J.et al. (2014). Association of hearing impairment with brain volume changes in older adults. Neuroimage90, 84–92. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.12.059

  • 35

    LinF. R.FerrucciL.MetterE. J.AnY.ZondermanA. B.ResnickS. M. (2011a). Hearing loss and cognition in the baltimore longitudinal study of aging. Neuropsychology25, 763–770. 10.1037/a0024238

  • 36

    LinF. R.MetterJ.O'BrienR. J.ResnickS. M.ZondermanA. B.FerrucciL. (2011b). Hearing loss and incident dementia. Arch. Neurol. 68, 214–220. 10.1001/archneurol.2010.362

  • 37

    McCoyS. L.TunP. A.CoxL. C.ColangeloM.StewartR.WingfieldA. (2005). Hearing loss and perceptual effort: downstream effects on older adults' memory for speech. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 58, 22–33. 10.1080/02724980443000151

  • 38

    McGettiganC.RosenS.ScottS. K. (2014). Lexico-semantic and acoustic-phonetic processes in the perception of noise-vocoded speech: implications for cochlear implantation. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 8:18. 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00018

  • 39

    MishraS.LunnerT.StenfeltS.RönnbergJ.RudnerM. (2013). Seeing the talker's face supports executive processing of speech in steady state noise. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 7:96. 10.3389/fnsys.2013.00096

  • 40

    PeelleJ. E.JohnsrudeI. S.DavisM. H. (2010). Hierarchical processing for speech in human auditory cortex and beyond. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 4:51. 10.3389/fnhum.2010.00051

  • 41

    PeelleJ. E.TroianiV.GrossmanM.WingfieldA. (2011). Hearing loss in older adults affects neural systems supporting speech comprehension. J. Neurosci. 31, 12638–12643. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2559-11.2011

  • 42

    Pichora-FullerM. K. (2003). Cognitive aging and auditory information processing. Int. J. Audiol. 42, 2S26–2S32. 10.3109/14992020309074641

  • 43

    RabbittP. M. A. (1991). Mild hearing loss can cause apparent memory failures which increase with age and reduce with IQ. Acta Otolaryngolica Suppl. 476, 167–176. discussion: 176.

  • 44

    RachakondaT.ShimonyJ. S.CoalsonR. S.LieuJ. E. C. (2014). Diffusion tensor imaging in children with unilateral hearing loss: a pilot study. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 8:87. 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00087

  • 45

    RauscheckerJ. P.ScottS. K. (2009). Maps and streams in the auditory cortex: nonhuman primates illuminate human speech processing. Nat. Neurosci. 12, 718–724. 10.1038/nn.2331

  • 46

    RönnbergJ.LunnerT.ZekveldA.SörqvistP.DanielssonH.LyxellB.et al. (2013). The ease of language understanding (ELU) model: theoretical, empirical, and clinical advances. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 7:31. 10.3389/fnsys.2013.00031

  • 47

    ShargorodskyJ.CurhanS. G.CurhanG. C.EaveyR. (2010). Change in prevalence of hearing loss in US adolescents. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 304, 772–778. 10.1001/jama.2010.1124

  • 48

    SurprenantA. M. (1999). The effect of noise on memory for spoken syllables. Int. J. Psychol. 34, 328–333. 10.1080/002075999399648

  • 49

    TremblayK.RossB.InoueK.McClannahanK.ColletG. (2014). Is the auditory evoked P2 response a biomarker of learning?Front. Syst. Neurosci. 8:28. 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00028

  • 50

    Van EngenK. J.PeelleJ. E. (2014). Listening effort and accented speech. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8:577. 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00577

  • 51

    WidenS. E.HolmesA. E.JohnsonT.BohlinM.ErlandssonS. I. (2009). Hearing, use of hearing protection, and attitudes towards noise among young American adults. Int. J. Audiol. 48, 537–545. 10.1080/14992020902894541

  • 52

    WingfieldA.McCoyS. L.PeelleJ. E.TunP. A.CoxC. (2006). Effects of adult aging and hearing loss on comprehension of rapid speech varying in syntactic complexity. J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 17, 487–497. 10.3766/jaaa.17.7.4

Summary

Keywords

hearing loss, auditory cortex, cognition, aging, listening effort

Citation

Wingfield A and Peelle JE (2015) The effects of hearing loss on neural processing and plasticity. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 9:35. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2015.00035

Received

14 January 2015

Accepted

19 February 2015

Published

06 March 2015

Volume

9 - 2015

Edited and reviewed by

Maria V. Sanchez-Vives, Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA) and Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Spain

Copyright

*Correspondence: Arthur Wingfield and Jonathan E. Peelle, ;

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics