Original Research ARTICLE
Hypertrophy Stimulation at the Onset of Type I Diabetes Maintains the Soleus but Not the EDL Muscle Mass in Wistar Rats
- 1Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
- 2Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile
- 3School of Health Sciences, College of Health, Massey University, Albany, New Zealand
- 4Interdisciplinary Post-Graduate Program in Health Sciences, Cruzeiro do Sul University, São Paulo, Brazil
Diabetes mellitus induces a reduction in skeletal muscle mass and strength. Strength training is prescribed as part of treatment since it improves glycemic control and promotes increase of skeletal muscle mass. The mechanisms involved in overload-induced muscle hypertrophy elicited at the establishment of the type I diabetic state was investigated in Wistar rats. The purpose was to examine whether the overload-induced hypertrophy can counteract the hypotrophy associated to the diabetic state. The experiments were performed in oxidative (soleus) or glycolytic (EDL) muscles. PI3K/Akt/mTOR protein synthesis pathway was evaluated 7 days after overload-induced hypertrophy of soleus and of EDL muscles. The mRNA expression of genes associated with different signaling pathways that control muscle hypertrophy was also evaluated: mechanotransduction (FAK), Wnt/β-catenin, myostatin, and follistatin. The soleus and EDL muscles when submitted to overload had similar hypertrophic responses in control and diabetic animals. The increase of absolute and specific twitch and tetanic forces had the same magnitude as muscle hypertrophic response. Hypertrophy of the EDL muscle from diabetic animals mostly involved mechanical loading-stimulated PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway besides the reduced activation of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) and decrease of myostatin expression. Hypertrophy was more pronounced in the soleus muscle of diabetic animals due to a more potent activation of rpS6 and increased mRNA expression of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), mechano-growth factor (MGF) and follistatin, and decrease of myostatin, MuRF-1 and atrogin-1 contents. The signaling changes enabled the soleus muscle mass and force of the diabetic rats to reach the values of the control group.
Reduced protein synthesis stimulation and increased protein degradation (Sandri, 2008; Schiaffino et al., 2013) are associated with the loss of skeletal muscle mass in type 1 diabetes (Barazzoni et al., 2004). Animals with diabetes mellitus induced by streptozotocin administration have increased short-term proteolytic activity in the skeletal muscle (1–3 days after diabetes induction) that returns to control values after 5–10 days (Pepato et al., 1996). The increase in short-term myostatin expression is associated with the severity of skeletal muscle loss, which is abolished by insulin treatment (Chen et al., 2009).
The mechanisms associated with sarcopenia and consequently on its prevention have been investigated (Roden, 2015). Streptozotocin-induced diabetic animals exhibit increased AMP kinase (AMPK) phosphorylation (Vitzel et al., 2013b) and impairs muscle hypertrophy through a reduced activation of protein synthesis signaling such as protein kinase B (Akt) in Ser473, mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) in Ser2448, ribosomal protein S6 (rpS6) in Thr389, and 4E binding protein-1 (4EBP-1) in Thr37 (Bolster et al., 2002; Thomson and Gordon, 2005).
Physical exercise is prescribed for diabetic patients in order to improve glycemic control. However, little is known about the association of diabetes mellitus and the skeletal muscle mass hypertrophy induced by resistive physical exercise. The overload due to ablation of the synergistic muscles is the most used experimental approach for the study of the mechanisms involved in the skeletal muscle hypertrophy (Rosenblatt and Parry, 1992; Phelan and Gonyea, 1997; Bodine et al., 2001; Ishido et al., 2006; Katta et al., 2010; Paturi et al., 2010). Peak activation of protein synthesis pathway is described after 7 days of the synergistic ablation surgery. After 30 days of hypertrophic stimulus, the skeletal muscle mass increase reaches a plateau (Armstrong and Ianuzzo, 1977; Farrell et al., 1999; Katta et al., 2010).
Diabetic myopathy has several consequences for skeletal muscle (for review see Krause et al., 2011; D'Souza et al., 2013) such as reduction in physical abilities, muscle mass, and strength (Andersen et al., 1996, 1997, 2004). In fact, only 3 days after diabetes induction by streptozotocin injection in rats, a significant reduction in soleus, EDL, and gastrocnemius muscle mass is described (Pepato et al., 1996; Price et al., 1996). However, despite the exacerbated muscular hypotrophy in the diabetic state, the ability of the soleus and extensor digitorum longus (EDL) muscles to respond to a hypertrophic stimulus, even under uncontrolled hyperglycemic state, is not impaired in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats (Fortes et al., 2015).
Taking into account the rapid onset of muscle loss upon diabetes induction and the prompt hypertrophic response caused by overload, we investigated if a hypertrophic stimulation could prevent or attenuate the muscle mass loss induced by the onset of the type 1 diabetes. For this purpose, the effects of tibialis anterior muscle ablation and gastrocnemius muscle tenotomy and the consequent overload-induced hypertrophy of the EDL and soleus muscles, respectively, concomitantly with the establishment of the diabetic state, were investigated in rats. We examined and compared the effects of short-term diabetic condition associated with a state of intense skeletal muscle stimulus for hypertrophy induced by overload on signaling pathways associated with protein synthesis and degradation controlled by phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)-Akt-mTOR, including the E3 ubiquitin ligase that are increased in atrophic conditions, MuRF-1 and atrogin-1; mechanotransduction by rpS6 phosphorylation and mRNA expression of Focal Adhesion Kinase (FAK) and MGF; mRNA expressions of myostatin and follistatin, Wnt/β-catenin and MG53 that are involved in myogenesis and may affect insulin signaling (Jung and Ko, 2010; Lee et al., 2010). The purpose of our study is to investigate the pathways associated to overload-induced muscle hypertrophy and to examine whether the hypertrophy would counteract the hypotrophy occurring soon after the onset of type I diabetes.
The hypothesis of the present study is that different signaling pathways are activated during skeletal muscle overload in type 1 diabetes mellitus in order to overcome the consequences of the low plasma insulin levels and so prevent/attenuate the marked loss of skeletal muscle mass observed after the onset of the diabetic state.
Animals and Diabetes Induction Protocol
Type 1 diabetes was induced in male Wistar rats weighing 200 ± 50 g obtained from the Institute of Biomedical Sciences at the University of São Paulo. The animals were housed in groups of three with water and food provided ad libitum in a room with a 12/12-h light/dark cycle at 22°C. Protocols for all experimental procedures were approved by the animal ethics committee (CEUA-ICB-USP, 26/16/03) and performed according with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC, USA) and the principles of the Brazilian College of Animal Experimentation (COBEA).
Hyperglycemic condition similar to type 1 diabetes was achieved by injection of 65 mg/kg b.w. streptozotocin dissolved in citrate buffer (pH 4.5) into the caudal vein (Ungvari et al., 1999; Fortes et al., 2015) whereas only the control group received the same volume of citrate buffer. After a 24-h period of the streptozotocin injection, blood glucose levels confirmed the diabetic state and only animals with or above 400 mg/dL (22.2 mmol/L) were used in the experiments. Animals displaying sustained hyperglycemia for 3 consecutive days (confirmation of the diabetic state) were submitted to surgery for skeletal muscle overload induction. Also, glucose levels were measured weekly and before tissue collection to ensure that the animals remained diabetic up to the end of the experiments as previously described (Fortes et al., 2015, 2016).
EDL and Soleus Muscles Overload Protocol
Soleus muscle hypertrophy was induced by unilateral synergistic tenotomy of the gastrocnemius muscle as previously described (Goldberg, 1972; Armstrong et al., 1979; Owino et al., 2001; Fortes et al., 2015). EDL muscle overload was induced by unilateral synergistic ablation of the tibialis anterior muscle, and it was performed in a different set of animals, as previously described (Rosenblatt and Parry, 1992; Hamilton et al., 2010; Fortes et al., 2015).
Muscle overloading was kept during 7 days for evaluation of protein content and mRNA expression because muscle protein synthesis is at its peak under this condition (Baillie and Garlick, 1991). In another set of animals, 30 days of overload was employed for evaluation of fiber cross-sectional area (CSA), twitch and tetanic forces, muscle mass and twitch contractile properties. After 30 days of overload, hypertrophied muscle no longer has increased protein synthesis activity and trophic response has reached its peak, therefore, being an appropriate time point for measurements of contractile activity (Armstrong and Ianuzzo, 1977; Farrell et al., 1999; Katta et al., 2010). The unilateral ablation and tenotomy allows paired comparison between sham and overloaded muscles and avoid inaccuracies due to the use of different animals (Thomson and Gordon, 2006). By the end of the experimental protocol, the control (CTRL), and diabetic (DM) groups were obtained, each one with a contralateral limb that does not undergo surgical intervention, the sham (CL), and the other limb that was ablated or tenotomized for hypertrophy (H).
Analysis of Skeletal Muscle Contractile Function and In Situ Electrical Stimulation
Evaluations of skeletal muscle contractile function were performed as previously described (Pinheiro et al., 2012; Fortes et al., 2015). After being anesthetized by using intraperitoneal injection of ketamine and xylazine (90 and 10 mg/kg b.w., ip., respectively), the rats were fixed on an acrylic platform and the hindlimb skin was excised for the assessment of the sciatic nerve and a platinum electrode was placed at the nerve. The synergistic and antagonist muscles were tenotomized to avoid interference in the measurements. The resting length of soleus or EDL muscles was adjusted to obtain maximum tension (the ankle joint approximately at a 90° angle) upon stimulation using the MultiStim System D330 electrical stimulation device (Digitimer Ltd, Welwyn Garden City, Hertfordshire, UK) by traction regulation of the hook coupled to the distal tendon and the force transducer (Grass Technologies, West Warwick, RI). Five twitch contractions were employed for determination of the muscle twitch force, time to peak (TTP—time between the onset of force development until peak tension), half relaxation time (HRT—time of muscle relaxation half-way from peak tension), late relaxation time (LRT—time of muscle relaxation between 50 and 25% of peak tension), and rate of force development (RFD—amount of force generated per time unit during skeletal muscle contraction). The twitch stimulus consisted of 500 μs pulse duration at 1 Hz with adjusted voltage to produce maximum force. For determination of the tetanic force, 10 successive contractions were elicited at 100 Hz, with 2 s duration each and 10 s of recovery period between them, being the first tetanic contraction used to assess the maximum tetanic force. Data were recorded using the AqDados® software (version 4.16, Lynx Tecnologia Eletrônica Ltda, São Paulo, Brazil) and analyzed using AqAnalysis® software (version 4.16, Lynx Tecnologia Eletrônica Ltda, São Paulo, Brazil).
Evaluation of fiber CSA was performed as previously described (Bodine and Baar, 2012; Marzuca-Nassr et al., 2016). Images were taken using an optical microscope (Nikon Eclipse E1000, Fukuoka, Japan) attached to a digital camera (NixonDXM1200). The images were analyzed using the AxioVision® program (version 188.8.131.52, Carl Zeiss Imaging Solutions, Jena, Germany).
Proteins were extracted and assayed as previously described (Vitzel et al., 2013a; Fortes et al., 2015; Marzuca-Nassr et al., 2016). The primary antibodies used were: p-Akt at Ser 473 (9271), Akt (9272), p-rpS6 at Ser 240/244 (5364), rpS6 (2217), p-4EBP-1 at Thr 37/46 (2855), 4EBP-1 (9644), p-AMPK-α at Thr 172 (2535), AMPK- α (2532) from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA, USA), and atrogin-1 (AP2041) and muscle RING-finger protein-1 (MuRF-1) (MP3401) from ECM Biosciences (Versailles, KY, USA). Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA, USA) provided the secondary antibody conjugated to peroxidase. The images were captured using an Amersham Imager 600 (Amersham/GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK). The densitometry of the specific bands was measured using the ImageJ software (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA). Results were normalized to the total loading of protein in each sample, quantified by Ponceau S staining (Romero-Calvo et al., 2010; Fortes et al., 2016). The contralateral muscle was considered as 1. Western blotting gels and ponceau staining are presented as Supplementary Material.
Total RNA was extracted according to the manufacturer's specification using the RNeasy kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). RNA concentration was estimated based on the optical density of the samples at 260 nm obtained in a DS-11 FX spectrophotometer (DeNovix, Wilmington, DE, USA). One microgram of RNA was used for reverse transcription and cDNA synthesis, using oligo-dT primers and the RevertAid M-MuLV reverse transcriptase kit (Invitrogen/Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA), following the manufacturer's instruction. The amplification of target genes sequences in the cDNA was performed through utilization of a SYBR Green qPCR kit (Invitrogen/Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) together with specific sense and antisense primers (Exxtend, São Paulo, Brazil) (Table 1) performed in a Rotor Gene 6000 equipment (Corbett Research, Mortlake, Australia). Relative gene expression calculation was performed by 2−ΔΔCT (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001). Results were normalized to the expression of hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase 1 (HPRT1).
Statistical analysis was performed using the GraphPad Prism® software (version 4.01; El Camino Real, CA, USA). Results are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) and were analyzed by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Bonferroni post-test (for comparison between three or more groups). Differences were considered statistically significant for p < 0.05. CSA of the EDL and soleus muscles fibers were not normally distributed, therefore, difference was considered significant when there was no overlap between the 95% confidence interval of the median calculated for each experimental group (Gehrig et al., 2008; Fortes et al., 2015; Marzuca-Nassr et al., 2016).
Body Weight and Glycaemia
The body mass of the control animals increased regularly whereas in diabetic animals remained almost unchanged for 30 days (Figure 1). Glycaemia remained unchanged in controls whereas in diabetic rats it was 3.9-fold higher than in the control group 72 h after induction of diabetes and further increased by 17% over the 30-day period.
Figure 1. Body weight (A) and glycaemia (B) of control and diabetic rats during 4 weeks of the experiments. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM of 13 animals. ***p < 0.001, using repeated measures two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post-test. CTRL, control group; DM, diabetic group.
Muscle Mass, Strength, and Contractile Properties
After 30 days of overload, the absolute and relative tetanic forces of the hypertrophied EDL muscle were different between diabetic and control animals. Absolute tetanic force increased by 40% in control and by 102% in diabetic rats (Table 2). EDL absolute twitch force was increased in the control and diabetic groups by 79 and 114%, respectively (Table 2).
In the EDL muscle of control animals, there was an increase of 25% in both absolute and normalized muscle wet weight due to the overload. In diabetic animals, there was an increase of 38 and 33% in the wet weight and the wet weight normalized by the tibia length, respectively (Table 2). In the control animals, there was an increase of 25% in the dry weight and the dry weight normalized by the tibia length. In diabetic animals, there was a 31 and 37% increase in dry weight and dry weight normalized by tibia length, respectively (Table 2).
The EDL muscle of diabetic rats had a decrease (by 45%) in LRT in the contralateral and in the hypertrophied (by 22%) EDL muscle when compared with control (Table 2). The RFD was higher in all hypertrophied muscles. In controls, there was an increase of 76% in relation to the contralateral muscle, whereas in the diabetic group it was raised by 2.5-fold.
After 30 days of overload, the absolute tetanic force of the hypertrophied soleus was different between the hypertrophied and contralateral muscles in both groups. Absolute tetanic force was increased by 77% in control animals and by 43% in diabetic rats (Table 3). The absolute twitch force of the soleus muscle was increased in the control and diabetic groups by 31 and 35%, respectively (Table 3).
Soleus muscle also presented an increase of 38% in the wet weight and the wet weight normalized by tibia length in the control group. In the diabetic group, there was an increase of 42 and 48% of the wet weight and the wet weight normalized by the tibia length, respectively (Table 3). In the control animals, the dry weight and the dry weight normalized by the tibia length were increased by 28% upon hypertrophy. In diabetic animals, there was an increase of about 45% in the dry weight and the dry weight normalized by the tibia length (Table 3).
The soleus muscle of control animals had a decrease in the LRT of 56% when they underwent hypertrophy (Table 3). The RFD was lower in the diabetic group both in the control and hypertrophied muscles.
CSA of the EDL and Soleus Muscles Fibers
CSA of the EDL and soleus muscles fibers were markedly increased due to overload in all groups as compared to non-hypertrophied muscles (Figures 2A,B, 3A,B). This effect, quantitatively assessed by the 95% confidence interval of the median, was supported by qualitative analysis of the proportion of fibers in different ranges of CSA (Figures 2C, 3C). Frequency distribution (Figures 2C, 3C) was calculated and expressed as previously performed by others (Baehr et al., 2011; Ge et al., 2011; Kulakowski et al., 2011; Pistilli et al., 2011; Watson et al., 2012; Callahan et al., 2014; Marzuca-Nassr et al., 2016). In the EDL muscle of the control group there was a 69% increase and in the diabetic animals of 97% (Figure 2). In the soleus muscle, there was an increase of 103% in the control group and of 70% in the diabetic group (Figure 3).
Figure 2. Cross-sectional areas (CSA) of the EDL muscle fibers. (A) Representative histological hematoxylin and eosin staining images of EDL muscle CSA. Reference bar represents 50 μm. (B) Dispersion graph of EDL muscle fibers CSA. (C) Frequency distribution of the EDL muscle fibers according to CSA ranges: 0–5,500 μm2. The results were analyzed as previously described using the 95% confidence interval of the median. *Significant different considering the 95% confidence interval of the median. CTRL-CL, control group, contralateral muscle; CTRL-H, control group, hypertrophied muscle; DM-CL, diabetic group, contralateral muscle; DM-H, diabetic group, hypertrophied muscle.
Figure 3. Cross-sectional areas (CSA) of the soleus muscle fibers. (A) Representative histological hematoxylin and eosin staining images of the soleus muscle CSA. Reference bar represents 50 μm. (B) Dispersion graph of soleus muscle fibers CSA. (C) Frequency distribution of the soleus muscle fibers according to the CSA ranges: 0–7,000 μm2. The results were analyzed as previously described using the 95% confidence interval of the median. *Significant difference considering the 95% confidence interval of the median. CTRL-CL, control group, contralateral muscle; CTRL-H, control group, hypertrophied muscle; DM-CL, diabetic group, contralateral muscle; DM-H, diabetic group, hypertrophied muscle.
Modulation of the Signaling Protein Contents after 7 Days of Muscle Overload
There was an increase in the content of total Akt by 2.2-fold in the EDL muscle of the control group after 7 days of overload. The content of p-AktSer473 was increased by 2.5-fold in the control and in the diabetic groups. Total rpS6 content was increased by 4.2-fold in the control group but did not change in the diabetic rats. The content of p-rpS6Ser244/240 was increased by 3.2-fold in the control group and by 2.6-fold in the diabetic due to overload stimulus. The total 4EBP-1 content, after 7 days of overload, was increased by 37% in the control group and by 23% in the diabetic. The contents of p-4EBP-1Thr37/46 was increased by 2.5-fold in the control group and by 2-fold in diabetic rats. The total AMPK content in the control group submitted to overload was reduced by 38%. The p-AMPKThr172 content was decreased by 34% in the control and by 54% in the diabetic group submitted to overload. The content of MuRF-1 changed only in the diabetic group submitted to overload with a 51% decrease. Quantitative analysis of western blots after 7 days of overload in the EDL muscle is in Figure 4.
Figure 4. (A–D, F–I) Contents of signaling proteins associated with protein synthesis and degradation in the EDL muscle after 7 days of overload. Quantitative analysis of western blotting of total and phosphorylated Akt, rpS6, AMPK, MuRF-1 and atrogin-1 of the EDL muscle. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM of at least six animals. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 using two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post-test. In (E,J), *p < 0.05 CTRL-CL/DM-CL vs. CTRL-H/DM-H using two-way ANOVA only. CTRL, Control group; DM, Diabetic group; CL, Contralateral; H, Hypertrophy. Western blotting gels and ponceau staining are presented in Supplementary Material.
The total Akt content in the soleus muscle after 7 days of overload in the control group was increased by 83% whereas in the diabetic rats there was a 2.6-fold increase (Figure 5A). The content of p-AKTSer473 increased by 2.4-fold in the control group whereas in diabetic rats there was a 3-fold increase (Figure 5B). The total rpS6 content increased by 3.7-fold (Figure 5C) in the control group and by 11-fold in the diabetic group. The contents of p-rpS6Ser244/240 increased by 2-fold in the control group and by 8.6-fold in the diabetic rats due to hypertrophy (Figure 5D). The total 4EBP-1 content, after 7 days of overload, increased by 68% (Figure 5E) in the control and in the diabetic groups. The contents of p-4EBP-1Thr37/46 in the soleus muscle increased (by 67%) in the control and in the diabetic groups (Figure 5F). The content of MuRF-1 decreased by 26% (Figure 5G) due to soleus muscle hypertrophy in the control and by 47% in the diabetic groups. Atrogin-1 had 36% decrease in the control and 45% reduction in the diabetic group (Figure 5H). The total AMPK content in the soleus muscle of the control group submitted to overload reduced by 40% and in the diabetic group by 27% (Figure 5I).
Figure 5. (A–D, F,H,J) Contents of signaling proteins associated with protein synthesis and degradation in the soleus muscle after 7 days of overload. Quantitative analysis of western blotting of total and phosphorylated Akt, rpS6, AMPK, MuRF-1 and atrogin-1 of the soleus muscle. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM of at least six animals. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 using two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post-test. In (E), #p < 0.05 for CTRL vs. DM and *p < 0.05 for CTRL-CL/DM-CL vs. CTRL-H/DM-H, in (G), *p < 0.05 for CTRL-CL/DM-CL vs. CTRL-H/DM-H, in (I), *p < 0.05 for CTRL-CL/DM-CL vs. CTRL-H/DM-H using two-way ANOVA only. Control group; DM, Diabetic group; CL, Contralateral muscle; H, Hypertrophied muscle. Western blotting gels and ponceau staining are presented in Supplementary Material.
Modulation of mRNA Content after Overload
In the control group, regarding the hypertrophic response, the amount of mRNA was different for the genes: FAK, 46% reduction in expression; Akt1, 2.5-fold increase; mTOR, 3.3-fold increase; β-catenin, 64% reduction; follistatin, 4.6-fold increase (Figure 6). In the diabetic group submitted to overload, mRNA response was different for the following genes: Akt1, increase of 3.6-fold; mTOR, 92% increase; β-catenin and myostatin, both 68% reduction; Wnt7a, reduction of 62%.
Figure 6. (A,B,D, F–M) mRNA expression of several genes in the EDL muscle after 7 days of overload. Results are presented as mean ± SEM of at least six animals. Results were analyzed using two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post-test. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. In (C), #p < 0.05 for CTRL-CL/DM-CL vs. CTRL-H/DM-H, in (E), #p < 0.05 for CTRL vs. DM using two-way ANOVA only. CL, Contralateral muscle; H, Hypertrophied muscle; DM, Diabetic group; CTRL, Control group.
mRNA expression in the contralateral EDL muscle was different between the control and the diabetic groups for the following genes: FAK, 49% lower in the diabetic group; IGF-1, 74% lower in the diabetic group; myostatin, 2.6-fold higher in the diabetic group; follistatin, 3.6-fold higher in the diabetic group. mTOR increased upon hypertrophy only in both groups (by 2.3-fold in CTRL and by 92% in DM) and MuRF-1 decreased due to diabetes (by 29% in the contralateral muscle and by 57% in the hypertrophied muscle).
The mRNA expression was also assessed after 7 days of overload in the soleus muscle (Figure 7). Regarding the hypertrophic response, the amount of mRNA in the control group was different for the genes: FAK, 43% reduction; mTOR, 51% reduction; Atrogin-1, 58% reduction; MG53, 11% reduction; IGF-1, 98% increase; MGF, 57% increase; myostatin, 79% reduction; Wnt7a, 33% reduction, axin2, 42% reduction.
Figure 7. (A–F, H–K, M) mRNA expression of several genes in the soleus muscle after 7 days of overload. Results are presented as mean ± SEM of at least nine animals. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post-test. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. In (G), *p < 0.05 CTRL vs. DM and #p < 0.05 for CTRL-CL/DM-CL vs. CTRL-H/DM-H, in (L), #p < 0.05 for CTRL-CL/DM-CL vs. CTRL-H/DM-H using two-way ANOVA only. CL, Contralateral muscle; H, Hypertrophied muscle; DM, Diabetic group; CTRL, Control group.
In the diabetic group upon hypertrophy, the amount of mRNA was different for the following genes: FAK, 27% reduction; mTOR, 33% reduction; MuRF-1, reduction by 60%; Atrogin-1, 45% reduction; MG53, reduction of 25%; IGF-1, 4.5-fold increase; MGF, 2.9-fold increase; myostatin, reduction by 65%; follistatin, 52% increase; Wnt7a, reduction of 30%. MG53 presented a decrease due to diabetes only (by 14% in the contralateral muscle and by 26% in the hypertrophied muscle).
The mRNA expression in the hypertrophied soleus muscle was different between the control and diabetic groups for the following genes: β-catenin, 23% lower in the diabetic group. mRNA content in the contralateral soleus was different between the control and diabetic groups for the following genes: Akt 1, 19% lower in diabetic group; Atrogin-1, 50% higher in the diabetic group; MGF, 51% lower in the diabetic group.
In our previous study, EDL and soleus muscles (exhibiting a myopathy condition) of 30-days streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats had similar response to hypertrophic stimulus as the control animals (Fortes et al., 2015). Our previous work was focused on a skeletal muscle hypertrophic response after an already established chronic diabetic condition (in diabetic myopathy) using two different protocols. First, animals were rendered diabetic and remained hyperglycemic for 30 days before being submitted to overload-induced hypertrophy for 7 days. Second, in a different set of animals, diabetes was induced for 30 days before overload-induced hypertrophy for another 30 days period. In the present study, we investigated the mechanisms associated to overload-induced muscle hypertrophy and tested if the hypertrophy would be able to counteract the hypotrophy observed at the onset of type I diabetes (before diabetic myopathy manifestation).
Several signaling pathways control protein synthesis and degradation act synergistically during hypertrophic stimulation. We reported in the previous study that the contribution of each pathway in the control of muscle mass varies between the control and diabetic groups. The diabetic rats had to overcome diabetic myopathy and the consequences of low plasma insulin levels to ensure skeletal muscle mass gain. The differences between groups may be also associated with the muscle recruitment trend and the susceptibility of each muscle to the metabolic alterations caused by the disease, and the distinct composition of fiber types such as in the soleus muscle (predominantly type I) and EDL (predominantly type II) muscles (Cotter et al., 1989). Although the response to overload was comparable to control, the hypertrophic response in diabetic animals was not able to restore muscle mass to control values (of the contralateral muscle), which could be related to the onset of hypertrophic stimulation that occurs after a severe hypotrophy caused by chronic diabetes. In the present study, the hypertrophic stimulus was initiated concomitantly with the diabetes induction. The purpose was to promote hypertrophic stimulation in the early stages of diabetes, when protein degradation signaling is more intense, as an attempt to prevent diabetes-induced muscle hypotrophy.
The overload maintained soleus muscle mass, CSA of the muscle fibers and force production in diabetic rats to similar values or even higher than in the contralateral muscle of control animals. The EDL muscles of diabetic animals were not able to reach the absolute contralateral values of the control group even after 30 days of hypertrophic stimulus. The greater response of the soleus muscle may be related to activation of different signaling pathways of protein synthesis and degradation as compared to EDL (Figure 8). EDL muscle is more susceptible to force and muscle mass loss than soleus muscle (Paulus and Grossie, 1983). The EDL muscle of diabetic rats suffered greater hypotrophy than the soleus muscle. A more severe hypotrophy in the glycolytic/fast-twitch fibers may be a result of the effects of glucocorticoids; the plasma levels of corticosterone are elevated in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats (Rhees et al., 1983) and these are the most susceptible fibers to the catabolic action of this hormone (Goldberg and Goodman, 1969). Reactive oxygen species (ROS) have been reported to, in long-term along with advanced glycation end-products (AGEs), promote skeletal muscle loss especially in the diabetic condition through a tightly coupling with PI3K/AKT signaling pathway (Grzelkowska-Kowalczyk et al., 2013; Zuo and Pannell, 2015; Zuo et al., 2015). Diabetic oxidative stress also impairs protein turnover and apoptotic process leading to muscle loss (Powers et al., 2012). Signaling differences (Figure 8A) might play an important role in the more pronounced atrophy of the EDL muscle reported.
Figure 8. Main signaling pathways involved in the hypertrophy of the soleus and EDL muscles. (A) Effect of the early diabetic condition upon mRNA content and (B) modulation of the main signaling pathways involved in the hypertrophy of the soleus and EDL muscles in control or diabetic animals and in both.
The signaling pathway involved in the soleus muscle hypertrophy in diabetes was comparable to that of the control rats. The same was not observed for EDL muscle hypertrophy that may have contributed to the lower hypertrophic response in the diabetic group. mRNA expression of IGF-1 and MGF in the EDL muscle did not respond to hypertrophic stimulus in diabetic animals as observed in the soleus muscle. This may have contributed for the low increase in the phosphorylated and total rpS6 contents and for the lack of responsiveness of atrogin-1 expression, which was not reduced as in the soleus due to hypertrophic stimulation. In the EDL muscle, there was a reduction of myostatin, whereas in the soleus a reduction of myostatin concomitantly with an increase in follistatin was described. Therefore, the restoration of muscle mass for values similar to the contralateral control was far more effective in the soleus.
IGF stimulates protein synthesis during overload and promotes hypertrophy (Coleman et al., 1995; Bodine et al., 2001; Schiaffino and Mammucari, 2011). However, overload-induced hypertrophy does not depend exclusively on the IGF-1 pathway stimulus since it occurs even when IGF-1 receptors are inactivated (Spangenburg et al., 2008; Klossner et al., 2009). IGF-1 activates the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway and its main effectors (p70S6K, rpS6, 4EBP-1) that induce synthesis of myofibrillar proteins (Bodine et al., 2001; Richter and Sonenberg, 2005; Bodine, 2006). Seven days of soleus muscle overload promoted an increase of IGF-1 and MGF mRNA expression in the diabetic and the control groups. In animals submitted to 37 days of diabetes, the MGF mRNA expression in the hypertrophied soleus muscle was also markedly elevated (Fortes et al., 2015). IGF-1 expression was lowered in the EDL muscle of the diabetic group even after 7 days of overload. As mentioned above, it may have contributed to the reduced hypertrophic response of the EDL muscle in diabetic animals when compared to the soleus. The lack of IGF-1/MGF response might be associated with the severe limitation for the muscle mass maintenance in diabetic condition. In animals submitted to 37 days of diabetes, IGF-1 mRNA expression in the hypertrophied EDL muscle was markedly elevated (about 10-fold in the control and 5-fold in the diabetic groups) (Fortes et al., 2015). This difference between soleus and EDL muscles responses in our previous study indicates that both the period that the muscle remains under mechanical stimulation and the long-term diabetic myopathy regulate the gene expression of growth factors when compared to the initial phase diabetes onset. The diabetic condition affects the skeletal muscle, hypertrophic response, the susceptibility to contraction-induced injury, the quantity and activation of satellite cells, and the amount and composition of extracellular matrix (Brannon et al., 1989; Umpierrez et al., 1989; Gulati and Swamy, 1991; Law et al., 2012; D'Souza et al., 2016). Protein synthesis signaling reaches the activation peak within 7 days of muscle overload regardless hormonal stimulation does not follow the same time course (Armstrong and Ianuzzo, 1977; Farrell et al., 1999; Katta et al., 2010), indicating p-Akt and p-rpS6 protein levels were increased in the EDL and soleus muscles when submitted to 7 days of overload as also observed by others (Thomson and Gordon, 2006; Hamilton et al., 2010; Miyazaki et al., 2011). There was an increase in the total and phosphorylated content of 4EBP-1 protein upon hypertrophic stimulus corroborating previous studies (Bodine, 2006; Potter et al., 2013). Akt and mTOR, important components of the canonical pathway of protein synthesis, had different mRNA expression in the soleus and EDL muscles. Despite phosphorylation and total amount of Akt being higher in the hypertrophied control and diabetic groups, as also reported by others (Miyazaki et al., 2011; Fortes et al., 2015), mRNA expression changes did not closely follow the changes of protein content in the soleus muscle, which indicates posttranslational modifications (Ohlendieck, 2011, 2013; Lourenço dos Santos et al., 2015; Wende, 2016).
AMPK may decrease mTORC1 activity by phosphorylation of Tuberin (TSC2) in Thr1345 (Inoki et al., 2003) or raptor in Ser792 (Gwinn et al., 2008). Mounier et al. (2009), after AMPKα1 gene ablation, reported more pronounced overload-induced hypertrophy in plantar muscle (Mounier et al., 2009). Increased AMPK activation in the plantar muscle (McGee et al., 2008; Hamilton et al., 2014) associated with a decrease in skeletal muscle hypertrophy (Bolster et al., 2002; Thomson and Gordon, 2005) have also been described. We reported a more pronounced response of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway in the soleus muscle in control and diabetic animals, despite not observing a reduction on the activation of AMPK. The AMPK activation may not be a determinant inhibitor of protein synthesis under the conditions of this study.
As a result of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway activation, the MuRF-1, and atrogin-1 mRNA expression was inhibited by their upstream signaling protein, FOXO (Stitt et al., 2004), reducing proteasome-associated protein degradation. MuRF-1 and atrogin-1 might also affect skeletal muscle remodeling that occurs during growth (Baehr et al., 2014). MuRF-1 and atrogin-1 expression was decreased in the soleus muscle of the control and diabetic rats upon overload, and the same did not occur in the EDL muscle. This may be due to the lower activation of PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway that contributed for the lower hypertrophic response in the EDL muscle.
MG53 expression was reduced by the diabetic condition as well by hypertrophic stimulus in the soleus muscle. This might be involved in the increased hypertrophic response of the soleus in diabetic animals as compared with the EDL muscle. MG53 is involved in the regulation of myogenic negative feedback and cleaves the insulin receptor substrate 1 (IRS-1) (Jung and Ko, 2010; Lee et al., 2010). MG53 acts synergistically with other two myogenic regulatory factors (MyoD—myogenic differentiation factor and MEF2—muscle enhancer factor 2) (Jung and Ko, 2010; Lee et al., 2010). MG53 promotes ubiquitination followed by degradation of IRS-1 and acts on the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling causing deficient synthesis of contractile myofibrillar proteins (Yi et al., 2013).
The expression of FAK, an enzyme involved in the mechanical signaling associated with skeletal muscle hypertrophy (Flück et al., 1999; Klossner et al., 2009), was increased in hypertrophied soleus and EDL muscles after 7 days of overload when animals were previously submitted to 30 days of diabetes (Fortes et al., 2015). However, when animals were submitted to a period of 7 days of overload initiated at the onset of diabetes, FAK mRNA expression had a decrease in both soleus and EDL muscles. These findings indicate that the expressions of proteins related to muscle hypertrophy changes with the period of the diabetic state.
The balance between myostatin and follistatin expressions also regulate skeletal muscle hypertrophy, with myostatin inhibiting and follistatin stimulating this process (Gilson et al., 2009). The absence of myostatin induces muscle growth whereas the elevation of its mRNA expression and exogenous administration causes muscle hypotrophy (McPherron and Lee, 1997; McPherron et al., 1997; Schuelke et al., 2004; Rodriguez et al., 2014). We reported a reduction in the myostatin mRNA in the EDL muscle. However, in the soleus, in addition to the reduction in myostatin, there was also an increase in follistatin mRNA. This combined response may contribute to a greater hypertrophic response in the soleus muscle in diabetes.
Wnt, β-catenin and axin influence skeletal muscle myogenesis, being necessary for skeletal muscle repair in response to injury (Newmire and Willoughby, 2015; Huraskin et al., 2016; Rudolf et al., 2016). There was no similar response of these three genes in the present study. The expression of β-catenin in the EDL muscle was reduced upon hypertrophy, which did not occur in the soleus muscle. Increased expression of β-catenin also participated in the soleus muscle hypertrophy process (Armstrong and Esser, 2005; Armstrong et al., 2006). β-Catenin expression was increased in the soleus muscle and at the same time Wnt remained almost unaltered. Since PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway is more active in the soleus, there may be a greater inhibition of GSK3β in this muscle, corroborating for the increase (or maintenance) in β-catenin levels and therefore contributing for the hypertrophic response (Jones et al., 2015).
The soleus and EDL muscles from diabetic animals submitted to overload at the onset of the disease (before diabetic myopathy manifestation) exhibited similar hypertrophic response. The increase of muscle forces occurred at the same magnitude as the muscle hypertrophy.
In the EDL muscle of diabetic animals, overload promoted hypertrophy via mechanical action, which involved the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway, reduced AMPK activation and decreased myostatin expression.
Hypertrophy was more pronounced in the soleus muscle of diabetic animals, as compared with the EDL, maintaining the muscle mass and force to similar values of the contralateral control muscle. This may be due to a more preserved hypertrophic signaling, in relation to the control group, including a higher content and activation of rpS6 than in the EDL muscle, increased mRNA expression of IGF-1, MGF, and follistatin and decreased mRNA expression of myostatin, MuRF-1 and atrogin-1.
We concluded that resistance exercise is an ally for the prevention of diabetic myopathy (hypotrophy) and when initiated early in the diabetes progression its effectiveness might be greater.
MF conceived of the study, carried out the molecular experiments, statistical analysis, conducted the animals' surgeries, interpreted the results, and wrote the manuscript. MS assisted in the molecular experiments. GM participated in the molecular studies, interpreted the results and assisted in the draft of the manuscript. KV assisted its design and coordination, interpreted the results and revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. CdJP participated in the interpretation of the results and revised for important intellectual content. RC revised for important intellectual content, assisted in the statistical analysis and draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The authors are grateful to the financial support of FAPESP, CNPq, CAPES, and C Foundation. The authors also acknowledge the technical support of Dr Tatiana Carolina Alba-Loureiro, Dr Gilson Murata, and José Roberto Mendonça.
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2017.00830/full#supplementary-material
Andersen, H., Gadeberg, P. C., Brock, B., and Jakobsen, J. (1997). Muscular atrophy in diabetic neuropathy: a stereological magnetic resonance imaging study. Diabetologia 40, 1062–1069. doi: 10.1007/s001250050788
Andersen, H., Poulsen, P. L., Mogensen, C. E., and Jakobsen, J. (1996). Isokinetic muscle strength in long-term IDDM patients in relation to diabetic complications. Diabetes 45, 440–445. doi: 10.2337/diab.45.4.440
Armstrong, D. D., and Esser, K. A. (2005). Wnt/beta-catenin signaling activates growth-control genes during overload-induced skeletal muscle hypertrophy. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 289, C853–C859. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00093.2005
Armstrong, D. D., Wong, V. L., and Esser, K. A (2006). Expression of beta-catenin is necessary for physiological growth of adult skeletal muscle. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 291, C185–C188. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00644.2005
Baehr, L. M., Furlow, J. D., and Bodine, S. C. (2011). Muscle sparing in muscle RING finger 1 null mice: response to synthetic glucocorticoids. J. Physiol. J. Physiol. 589(Pt 19), 4759–4776. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.212845
Baehr, L. M., Tunzi, M., and Bodine, S. C. (2014). Muscle hypertrophy is associated with increases in proteasome activity that is independent of MuRF1 and MAFbx expression. Front. Physiol. 5:69. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2014.00069
Barazzoni, R., Zanetti, M., Bosutti, A., Stebel, M., Cattin, L., Biolo, G., et al. (2004). Myostatin expression is not altered by insulin deficiency and replacement in streptozotocin-diabetic rat skeletal muscles. Clin. Nutr. 23, 1413–1417. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2004.06.007
Bodine, S. C., Stitt, T. N., Gonzalez, M., Kline, W. O., Stover, G. L., Bauerlein, R., et al. (2001). Akt/mTOR pathway is a crucial regulator of skeletal muscle hypertrophy and can prevent muscle atrophy in vivo. Nat. Cell Biol. 3, 1014–1019. doi: 10.1038/ncb1101-1014
Bolster, D. R., Crozier, S. J., Kimball, S. R., and Jefferson, L. S. (2002). AMP-activated protein kinase suppresses protein synthesis in rat skeletal muscle through down-regulated mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 23977–23980. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C200171200
Brannon, M. A., Dodson, M. V., Wheeler, B. A., Mathison, B. D., and Mathison, B. A. (1989). Satellite cells derived from streptozotocin-diabetic rats display altered fusion parameters in vitro. Metabolism 38, 348–352. doi: 10.1016/0026-0495(89)90123-6
Callahan, D. M., Bedrin, N. G., Subramanian, M., Berking, J., Ades, P. A., Toth, M. J., et al. (2014). Age-related structural alterations in human skeletal muscle fibers and mitochondria are sex specific: relationship to single-fiber function. J. Appl. Physiol. 116, 1582–1592. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01362.2013
Chen, Y., Cao, L., Ye, J., and Zhu, D. (2009). Upregulation of myostatin gene expression in streptozotocin-induced type 1 diabetes mice is attenuated by insulin. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 388, 112–116. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.07.129
Coleman, M. E., DeMayo, F., Yin, K. C., Lee, H. M., Geske, R., Montgomery, C., et al. (1995). Myogenic vector expression of insulin-like growth factor I stimulates muscle cell differentiation and myofiber hypertrophy in transgenic mice. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 12109–12116. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.20.12109
Cotter, M., Cameron, N. E., Lean, D. R., and Robertson, S. (1989). Effects of long-term streptozotocin diabetes on the contractile and histochemical properties of rat muscles. Q. J. Exp. Physiol. 74, 65–74. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.1989.sp003240
D'Souza, D. M., Zhou, S., Rebalka, I. A., MacDonald, B. M., Moradi, J., Krause, M. P., et al. (2016). Decreased satellite cell number and function in humans and mice with type 1 diabetes is the result of altered notch signaling. Diabetes 65, 3053–3061. doi: 10.2337/db15-1577
Farrell, P. A., Fedele, M. J., Hernandez, J., Fluckey, J. D., Miller, J. L., Lang, C. H., et al. (1999). Hypertrophy of skeletal muscle in diabetic rats in response to chronic resistance exercise. J. Appl. Physiol. 87, 1075–1082.
Fortes, M. A. S., Marzuca-Nassr, G. N., Vitzel, K. F., da Justa Pinheiro, C. H., Newsholme, P., and Curi, R. (2016). Housekeeping proteins: how useful are they in skeletal muscle diabetes studies and muscle hypertrophy models? Anal. Biochem. 504, 38–40. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2016.03.023
Fortes, M. A. S., Pinheiro, C. H. J., Guimarães-Ferreira, L., Vitzel, K. F., Vasconcelos, D. A. A., and Curi, R. (2015). Overload-induced skeletal muscle hypertrophy is not impaired in STZ-diabetic rats. Physiol. Rep. 3:e12457. doi: 10.14814/phy2.12457
Ge, X., McFarlane, C., Vajjala, A., Lokireddy, S., Ng, Z. H., Tan, C. K., et al. (2011). Smad3 signaling is required for satellite cell function and myogenic differentiation of myoblasts. Cell Res. 21, 1591–1604. doi: 10.1038/cr.2011.72
Gehrig, S. M., Ryall, J. G., Schertzer, J. D., and Lynch, G. S. (2008). Insulin-like growth factor-I analogue protects muscles of dystrophic mdx mice from contraction-mediated damage. Exp. Physiol. 93, 1190–1198. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.2008.042838
Gilson, H., Schakman, O., Kalista, S., Lause, P., Tsuchida, K., and Thissen, J.-P. (2009). Follistatin induces muscle hypertrophy through satellite cell proliferation and inhibition of both myostatin and activin. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 297, E157–E164. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00193.2009
Grzelkowska-Kowalczyk, K., Wieteska-Skrzeczynska, W., Grabiec, K., and Tokarska, J. (2013). High glucose-mediated alterations of mechanisms important in myogenesis of mouse C2C12 myoblasts. Cell Biol. Int. 37, 29–35. doi: 10.1002/cbin.10004
Gwinn, D. M., Shackelford, D. B., Egan, D. F., Mihaylova, M. M., Mery, A., Vasquez, D. S., et al. (2008). AMPK phosphorylation of raptor mediates a metabolic checkpoint. Mol. Cell 25, 214–226. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.03.003
Hamilton, D. L., Philp, A., MacKenzie, M. G., and Baar, K. (2010). A limited role for PI(3,4,5)P3 regulation in controlling skeletal muscle mass in response to resistance exercise. PLoS ONE 5:e11624. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011624
Hamilton, D. L., Philp, A., MacKenzie, M. G., Patton, A., Towler, M. C., Gallagher, I. J., et al. (2014). Molecular brakes regulating mTORC1 activation in skeletal muscle following synergist ablation. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 307, E365–E373. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00674.2013
Huraskin, D., Eiber, N., Reichel, M., Zidek, L. M., Kravic, B., Bernkopf, D., et al. (2016). Wnt/β-catenin signaling via Axin2 is required for myogenesis and, together with YAP/Taz and Tead1, active in IIa/IIx muscle fibers. Development 143, 3128–3142. doi: 10.1242/dev.139907
Ishido, M., Uda, M., Masuhara, M., and Kami, K. (2006). Alterations of M-cadherin, neural cell adhesion molecule and beta-catenin expression in satellite cells during overload-induced skeletal muscle hypertrophy. Acta Physiol. 187, 407–418. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.2006.01577.x
Jones, A. E., Price, F. D., Le Grand, F., Soleimani, V. D., Dick, S. A., Megeney, L. A., et al. (2015). Wnt/β-catenin controls follistatin signalling to regulate satellite cell myogenic potential. Skelet. Muscle 5:14. doi: 10.1186/s13395-015-0038-6
Jung, S. Y., and Ko, Y. G. (2010). TRIM72, a novel negative feedback regulator of myogenesis, is transcriptionally activated by the synergism of MyoD (or myogenin) and MEF2. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 396, 238–245. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.04.072
Katta, A., Kundla, S., Kakarla, S. K., Wu, M., Fannin, J., Paturi, S., et al. (2010). Impaired overload-induced hypertrophy is associated with diminished mTOR signaling in insulin-resistant skeletal muscle of the obese Zucker rat. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 299, R1666–R1675. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00229.2010
Klossner, S., Durieux, A.-C., Freyssenet, D., and Flueck, M. (2009). Mechano-transduction to muscle protein synthesis is modulated by FAK. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 106, 389–398. doi: 10.1007/s00421-009-1032-7
Krause, M. P., Riddell, M. C., and Hawke, T. J. (2011). Effects of type 1 diabetes mellitus on skeletal muscle: clinical observations and physiological mechanisms. Pediatr. Diabetes 12, 345–364. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2010.00699.x
Kulakowski, S. A., Parker, S. D., and Personius, K. E. (2011). Reduced TrkB expression results in precocious age-like changes in neuromuscular structure, neurotransmission, and muscle function. J. Appl. Physiol. 111, 844–852. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00070.2011
Law, B., Fowlkes, V., Goldsmith, J. G., Carver, W., and Goldsmith, E. C. (2012). Diabetes-induced alterations in the extracellular matrix and their impact on myocardial function. Microsc. Microanal. 18, 22–34. doi: 10.1017/S1431927611012256
Lee, C. S., Yi, J.-S., Jung, S.-Y., Kim, B.-W., Lee, N.-R., Choo, H.-J., et al. (2010). TRIM72 negatively regulates myogenesis via targeting insulin receptor substrate-1. Cell Death Differ. 17, 1254–1265. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2010.1
Livak, K. J., and Schmittgen, T. D. (2001). Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 25, 402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262
Lourenço dos Santos, S., Baraibar, M. A., Lundberg, S., Eeg-Olofsson, O., Larsson, L., and Friguet, B. (2015). Oxidative proteome alterations during skeletal muscle ageing. Redox Biol. 5, 267–274. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2015.05.006
Marzuca-Nassr, G. N., Vitzel, K. F., De Sousa, L. G., Murata, G. M., Crisma, A. R., Rodrigues Junior, C. F., et al. (2016). Effects of high EPA and high DHA fish oils on changes in signaling associated with protein metabolism induced by hindlimb suspension in rats. Physiol. Rep. 4:e12958. doi: 10.14814/phy2.12958
McGee, S. L., Mustard, K. J., Hardie, D. G., and Baar, K. (2008). Normal hypertrophy accompanied by phosphoryation and activation of AMP-activated protein kinase alpha1 following overload in LKB1 knockout mice. J. Physiol. 586, 1731–1741. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.143685
Miyazaki, M., McCarthy, J. J., Fedele, M. J., and Esser, K. A (2011). Early activation of mTORC1 signalling in response to mechanical overload is independent of phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt signalling. J. Physiol. 589, 1831–1846. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.205658
Mounier, R., Lantier, L., Leclerc, J., Sotiropoulos, A., Pende, M., Daegelen, D., et al. (2009). Important role for AMPKalpha1 in limiting skeletal muscle cell hypertrophy. FASEB J. 23, 2264–2273. doi: 10.1096/fj.08-119057
Newmire, D., and Willoughby, D. S. (2015). Wnt and β-catenin signaling and skeletal muscle myogenesis in response to muscle damage and resistance exercise and training. Int. J. Kinesiol. Sports Sci. 3, 40–49. doi: 10.7575/aiac.ijkss.v.3n.4p.40
Owino, V., Yang, S. Y., and Goldspink, G. (2001). Age-related loss of skeletal muscle function and the inability to express the autocrine form of insulin-like growth factor-1 (MGF) in response to mechanical overload. FEBS Lett. 505, 259–263. doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(01)02825-3
Paturi, S., Gutta, A. K., Kakarla, S. K., Katta, A., Arnold, E. C., Wu, M., et al. (2010). Impaired overload-induced hypertrophy in obese Zucker rat slow-twitch skeletal muscle. J. Appl. Physiol. 108, 7–13. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00330.2009
Pepato, M. T., Migliorini, R. H., Goldberg, A. L., and Kettelhut, I. C. (1996). Role of different proteolytic pathways in degradation of muscle protein from streptozotocin-diabetic rats. Am. J. Physiol. 271, E340–E347.
Phelan, J. N., and Gonyea, W. J. (1997). Effect of radiation on satellite cell activity and protein expression in overloaded mammalian skeletal muscle. Anat. Rec. 247, 179–188. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0185(199702)247:2<179::AID-AR4>3.0.CO;2-T
Pinheiro, C. H. J., Vitzel, K. F., and Curi, R. (2012). Effect of N-acetylcysteine on markers of skeletal muscle injury after fatiguing contractile activity. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 22, 24–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2010.01143.x
Pistilli, E. E., Bogdanovich, S., Goncalves, M. D., Ahima, R. S., Lachey, J., Seehra, J., et al. (2011). Targeting the activin type IIB receptor to improve muscle mass and function in the mdx mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Am. J. Pathol. 178, 1287–1297. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2010.11.071
Potter, R. A., DeLong, A. D., Smith, S. M., Erb, B. M., Renwand, B., Kamei, Y., et al. (2013). FoxO1 inhibits skeletal muscle hypertrophy through mTOR-independent mechanisms. J. Exerc. Physiol. Online 16, 32–50.
Powers, S. K., Smuder, A. J., and Judge, A. R. (2012). Oxidative stress and disuse muscle atrophy: cause or consequence? Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 15, 240–245. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0b013e328352b4c2
Price, S. R., Bailey, J. L., Wang, X., Jurkovitz, C., England, B. K., Ding, X., et al. (1996). Muscle wasting in insulinopenic rats results from activation of the ATP-dependent, ubiquitin-proteasome proteolytic pathway by a mechanism including gene transcription. J. Clin. Invest. 98, 1703–1708. doi: 10.1172/JCI118968
Rhees, R. W., Wilson, C. T., and Heninger, R. W. (1983). Influence of streptozotocin diabetes and insulin therapy on plasma corticosterone levels in male rats. Horm. Metab. Res. 15, 353–354. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1018718
Rodriguez, J., Vernus, B., Chelh, I., Cassar-Malek, I., Gabillard, J. C., Hadj Sassi, A., et al. (2014). Myostatin and the skeletal muscle atrophy and hypertrophy signaling pathways. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 71, 4361–4371. doi: 10.1007/s00018-014-1689-x
Romero-Calvo, I., Ocón, B., Martínez-Moya, P., Suárez, M. D., Zarzuelo, A., Martínez-Augustin, O., et al. (2010). Reversible Ponceau staining as a loading control alternative to actin in Western blots. Anal. Biochem. 401, 318–320. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2010.02.036
Rudolf, A., Schirwis, E., Giordani, L., Parisi, A., Lepper, C., Taketo, M. M., et al. (2016). β-catenin activation in muscle progenitor cells regulates tissue repair. Cell Rep. 15, 1277–1290. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.04.022
Schuelke, M., Wagner, K. R., Stolz, L. E., Hübner, C., Riebel, T., Kömen, W., et al. (2004). Myostatin mutation associated with gross muscle hypertrophy in a child. N. Engl. J. Med. 350, 2682–2688. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040933
Spangenburg, E. E., Le Roith, D., Ward, C. W., and Bodine, S. C. (2008). A functional insulin-like growth factor receptor is not necessary for load-induced skeletal muscle hypertrophy. J. Physiol. 586, 283–291. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.141507
Stitt, T. N., Drujan, D., Clarke, B. A., Panaro, F., Timofeyva, Y., Kline, W. O., et al. (2004). The IGF-1/PI3K/Akt pathway prevents expression of muscle atrophy-induced ubiquitin ligases by inhibiting FOXO transcription factors. Mol. Cell 14, 395–403. doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(04)00211-4
Thomson, D. M., and Gordon, S. E. (2005). Diminished overload-induced hypertrophy in aged fast-twitch skeletal muscle is associated with AMPK hyperphosphorylation. J. Appl. Physiol. 98, 557–564. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00811.2004
Thomson, D. M., and Gordon, S. E. (2006). Impaired overload-induced muscle growth is associated with diminished translational signalling in aged rat fast-twitch skeletal muscle. J. Physiol. 574, 291–305. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.107490
Ungvari, Z., Pacher, P., Kecskemeti, V., Papp, G., Szollár, L., and Koller, A. (1999). Increased myogenic tone in skeletal muscle arterioles of diabetic rats. Possible role of increased activity of smooth muscle Ca2+ channels and protein kinase C. Cardiovasc. Res. 43, 1018–1028. doi: 10.1016/S0008-6363(99)00106-6
Vitzel, K. F., Bikopoulos, G., Hung, S., Curi, R., and Ceddia, R. B. (2013a). Loss of the anorexic response to systemic 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide-1-β-D-ribofuranoside administration despite reducing hypothalamic AMP-activated protein kinase phosphorylation in insulin-deficient rats. PLoS ONE 8:e71944. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071944
Vitzel, K. F., Bikopoulos, G., Hung, S., Pistor, K. E., Patterson, J. D., Curi, R., et al. (2013b). Chronic treatment with the AMP-kinase activator AICAR increases glycogen storage and fatty acid oxidation in skeletal muscles but does not reduce hyperglucagonemia and hyperglycemia in insulin deficient rats. PLoS ONE 8:e62190. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062190
Watson, M. L., Baehr, L. M., Reichardt, H. M., Tuckermann, J. P., Bodine, S. C., and Furlow, J. D. (2012). A cell-autonomous role for the glucocorticoid receptor in skeletal muscle atrophy induced by systemic glucocorticoid exposure. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 302, E1210–E1220. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00512.2011
Yi, J.-S., Park, J. S., Ham, Y.-M., Nguyen, N., Lee, N.-R., Hong, J., et al. (2013). MG53-induced IRS-1 ubiquitination negatively regulates skeletal myogenesis and insulin signalling. Nat. Commun. 4:2354. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3354
Zuo, L., Pannell, B. K., Re, A. T., Best, T. M., and Wagner, P. D. (2015). Po2 cycling protects diaphragm function during reoxygenation via ROS, Akt, ERK, and mitochondrial channels. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 309, C759–C766. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00174.2015
Keywords: skeletal muscle, protein synthesis, muscle strength, hyperglycemia, electrostimulation, muscle mass regulation
Citation: Fortes MAS, Scervino MVM, Marzuca-Nassr GN, Vitzel KF, da Justa Pinheiro CH and Curi R (2017) Hypertrophy Stimulation at the Onset of Type I Diabetes Maintains the Soleus but Not the EDL Muscle Mass in Wistar Rats. Front. Physiol. 8:830. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00830
Received: 07 July 2017; Accepted: 06 October 2017;
Published: 26 October 2017.
Edited by:Li Zuo, The Ohio State University Columbus, United States
Reviewed by:Zewen Liu, Wuhan University, China
Tomohiro Nakamura, Osaka Institute of Technology, Japan
Giorgos K. Sakkas, University of St Mark and St John, United Kingdom
Copyright © 2017 Fortes, Scervino, Marzuca-Nassr, Vitzel, da Justa Pinheiro and Curi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Marco A. S. Fortes, email@example.com