ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Physiol., 30 November 2017

Sec. Avian Physiology

Volume 8 - 2017 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00948

Response of Turkey Muscle Satellite Cells to Thermal Challenge. II. Transcriptome Effects in Differentiating Cells

  • 1. Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, United States

  • 2. Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States

  • 3. Department of Animal Sciences, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Ohio State University, Wooster, OH, United States

Abstract

Background: Exposure of poultry to extreme temperatures during the critical period of post-hatch growth can seriously affect muscle development and thus compromise subsequent meat quality. This study was designed to characterize transcriptional changes induced in turkey muscle satellite cells by thermal challenge during differentiation. Our goal is to better define how thermal stress alters breast muscle ultrastructure and subsequent development.

Results: Skeletal muscle satellite cells previously isolated from the Pectoralis major muscle of 7-wk-old male turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) from two breeding lines: the F-line (16 wk body weight-selected) and RBC2 (randombred control line) were used in this study. Cultured cells were induced to differentiate at 38°C (control) or thermal challenge temperatures of 33 or 43°C. After 48 h of differentiation, cells were harvested and total RNA was isolated for RNAseq analysis. Analysis of 39.9 Gb of sequence found 89% mapped to the turkey genome (UMD5.0, annotation 101) with average expression of 18,917 genes per library. In the cultured satellite cells, slow/cardiac muscle isoforms are generally present in greater abundance than fast skeletal isoforms. Statistically significant differences in gene expression were observed among treatments and between turkey lines, with a greater number of genes affected in the F-line cells following cold treatment whereas more differentially expressed (DE) genes were observed in the RBC2 cells following heat treatment. Many of the most significant pathways involved signaling, consistent with ongoing cellular differentiation. Regulation of Ca2+ homeostasis appears to be significantly affected by temperature treatment, particularly cold treatment.

Conclusions: Satellite cell differentiation is directly influenced by temperature at the level of gene transcription with greater effects attributed to selection for fast growth. At lower temperature, muscle-associated genes in the satellite cells were among the genes with the greatest down regulation consistent with slower differentiation and smaller myotubes. Fewer expression differences were observed in the differentiating cells than previously observed for proliferating cells. This suggests the impact of temperature on satellite cells occurs primarily at early points in satellite cell activation.

Introduction

Skeletal muscle hypertrophy is a multifaceted process. During embryonic development, undifferentiated cells in the mesoderm (myoblasts) proliferate, differentiate, and fuse to form multinucleated myotubes that further differentiate into muscle fibers. Subsequent muscle growth is dependent upon satellite cells; stem cells located between the basement membrane and sarcolemma of skeletal muscle fibers (Mauro, 1961; Moss and Leblond, 1971). Satellite cells are self-renewing mesenchymal cells that enable further hypertrophy, maintenance, and repair of damaged skeletal muscle. After initial muscle growth and development, satellite cells become quiescent unless activated by antagonized Notch and Wnt signaling (reviewed in Fujimaki et al., 2013). Evidence from cell culture studies suggest that satellite cells are multi-potential and can be induced to follow osteogenic or adipogenic cellular pathways in addition to myogenesis (Asakura et al., 2001; Powell et al., 2016).

In the early post-hatch period, avian satellite cells are highly active (Halevy et al., 2000; Mozdziak et al., 2002). This activity can be directly affected by environmental stimuli with potential long-lasting effects on skeletal muscle growth (Piestun et al., 2013; Loyau et al., 2014). Thermal challenge is especially impactful on poults. Newly-hatched birds have immature thermoregulatory systems and are more susceptible to the effects of extreme ambient temperature (Myhre, 1978; Modrey and Nichelmann, 1992; Shinder et al., 2007). Given the need to transfer poults from hatch to grow facilities, this is also the period where birds are often exposed to acute thermal conditions, either hot or cold. The timing of thermal stress can differentially affect production performance. For example, broilers exposed early posthatch to elevated temperatures show increased body weight and yield at market age (Yahav and Plavnik, 1999; Yahav and McMurtry, 2001). Birds reared in elevated temperatures during later posthatch growth had reduced feed intake, weight gain, and meat yield (Ain Baziz et al., 1996; Halevy et al., 2001; Zhang et al., 2012).

Genetic selection has resulted in poultry with greater breast muscle weights and shorter growth periods (Havenstein et al., 2007). Satellite cells are in part responsible for the increase degree of muscle growth as the rates of satellite cell proliferation and differentiation are higher in birds selected for increased growth (Velleman et al., 2000). Extreme growth however, can be accompanied by physiological muscle defects that affect yield (Siller and Wight, 1979; Wilson et al., 1990). For example, increase in muscle fiber size displaces capillaries causing reduced blood supply, reduced heat dissipation and the accumulation of metabolic waste products (Sosnicki et al., 1991a,b; Kurnoth et al., 1994). Growth-selected birds respond differently to elevated environmental temperatures. The effects of long-term thermal stress on skeletal muscle growth and muscle damage is greater in fast-growing meat-type broilers as compared to slow-growing broilers (Ain Baziz et al., 1996; Lu et al., 2007).

As satellite cells are the only posthatch myonuclear source, they may directly modify skeletal muscle growth if functionally altered by temperature. Clark et al. (2016a) demonstrated in vitro that turkey satellite cell function is sensitive to both hot and cold temperatures with expression of key myogenic regulatory factors (myogenic differentiation factor, MYOD1 and myogenin, MYOG) increasing with temperature. In addition, proliferation of satellite cells from growth-selected turkeys was increased compared to that of cells from a non-selected line when incubated at higher temperatures. The differential response of fast- and slow-growing turkeys to temperature may be due to differences in satellite cell thermal sensitivity. Understanding the interaction between temperature and muscle growth and its impact on yield is significant to the poultry industry.

Previously, we utilized cultured turkey satellite cells to study the effects of thermal challenge on the transcriptome of proliferating satellite cells (Reed et al., 2017). Significant gene expression differences were observed between cells incubated at both hot and cold temperatures. Enrichment analysis indicated a shift in cold-treated cells toward cell signaling whereas heat-treated cells had expression profiles shifted toward muscle development. Markers of cell proliferation such as MYOD1 and several interacting genes were significantly upregulated in the heat-exposed cells and differential expression of chief myogenic regulators and pathways activated by Wnt ligands were observed. Greater differences in gene expression were observed for satellite cells from growth-selected birds as compared to random bred controls. The present study uses RNAseq transcriptome analysis to characterize gene expression in differentiating satellite cells under the same thermal challenge model. Understanding how temperature affects satellite cell differentiation can potentially be used to develop thermal management strategies to improve skeletal muscle growth.

Methods

Turkey myogenic satellite cells

Satellite cells used in this study were previously isolated from the pectoralis major (p. major) muscle of 7 wk old males from two turkey lines; the random bred control 2 (RBC2) and body weight-selected (F) (Velleman et al., 2000). The RBC2 line is maintained without conscious selection for any trait and the F line is derived from the RBC2 line and selected for 16 wk body weight (Nestor, 1977, 1984).

Turkey p. major satellite cells were replicate plated and proliferated as described in Reed et al. (2017). After 72 h of proliferation at 38°C, the growth medium was removed and the cells were fed a lower-serum medium containing DMEM, 3% horse serum (Gemini BioProducts), 1% antibiotics-antimycotics (Gemini BioProducts), 0.1% gentamicin (Gemini BioProducts), and 1 mg/mL bovine serum albumin (BSA, Sigma Aldrich) to induce differentiation. Cells were cultured in 95% air/5%CO2 incubators at 38°C (control) or at an experimental temperature (33 or 43°C). Medium was changed at 24 h. The control temperature of 38°C is approximately equal to that measured in newly hatched poults (38.0–38.5°C; Strasburg, unpublished). Initiation of differentiation was characterized by the visual observance of multinucleated myotubules. At the conclusion of the 48 h treatment, cell medium was removed, cells were rinsed with PBS and the plates were held at −80°C until RNA isolation.

RNA isolation and sequencing

Total RNA was isolated from each culture by TRIzol extraction (Ambion, Inc.), DNase-treated (Turbo DNA-freeTM Kit, Ambion, Inc.), and stored at −80°C. Initial RNA concentration and quality was measured (Nanodrop 1000) and samples were submitted for library preparation and sequencing at the University of Minnesota Genomics Center (UMGC). Samples were quantified by RiboGreen Assay and RNA integrity was measured on a 2100 Bioanalyzer (Aligent Technologies). All sample had clear peak separation (18S and 28S) and RNA Integrity Numbers (RIN) ranged between 5.1 and 8.8. Indexed libraries were constructed with the TruSeq RNA Sample Preparation Kit version 2 (Illumina, Inc.) from 1 μg of total RNA/sample. Libraries were multiplexed, pooled and sequenced (101-bp paired-end reads) on the HiSeq 2000 using v3 chemistry (Illumina, Inc.). Replicate samples were sequenced from each treatment group (n = 12 libraries).

RNAseq data analyses

Trimmomatic (Bolger et al., 2014) was used to remove sequence adapters and low quality bases and quality control checks were performed with FastQC (Andrews, 2010). Groomed reads were subsequently mapped to the turkey genome (UMD 5.0, NCBI Annotation 101) with Bowtie (v2.2.4.0). Read counts were normalized in CLC Genomics Workbench (CLCGWB v. 8.0.2, CLC Bio) as described in Reed et al. (2017). Using normalized read counts, samples were hierarchically clustered based on Euclidean sample distances with single linkage and principal component analysis (PCA) was performed in CLCGWB. Differential gene expression and ANOVA was performed in CLCGWB (Bonferroni and FDR corrected) and pair-wise comparisons between treatment groups were made in the Bioconductor (3.2) R package DESeq2 (Love et al., 2014) under the standard workflow. For all comparisons, p < 0.05 were considered significant. Affected gene pathways were investigated with Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA, Qiagen Bioinformatics). For analysis, the turkey annotated gene set, was mapped to the IPA database (11,615 IDs) and Log2FC and FDR-corrected p-values were imported. Core and comparative analyses of gene expression were run with FDR p-val cutoff set at 0.05. The PANTHER Overrepresentation Test (release 20150430, Mi et al., 2013; http://geneontology.org/) was used to test for gene enrichment. Data are deposited in the NCBI's Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) repository as part of SRA BioProject 341399.

Results

Total RNA isolated from satellite cell cultures was used to construct 12 individual barcoded libraries. Sequencing of the libraries produced over 394 M combined reads with the number of reads per library ranging from 12.4 to 18.5 M (average 16.4 M). After read trimming and filtering, median read quality was consistently high and ranged from 36.8 to 37.3. Replicate libraries for each treatment produced comparable results with the number of reads per treatment group ranging from 29 to 36.4 M (average 32.9 ± 1.25 M reads). Cumulatively, corrected reads comprised 39.9 Gb of sequence for transcriptome analysis. Mean library insert was estimated from mapping results as 213.4 bp (Table 1).

Table 1

LineTemp °CReplicatePE readsMedian read quality R1Median read quality R2Trimmed PE reads% mapped% concordantEstimated insert mean (bp)Total observed genesMean expressed genes% expressed genes
RBC233A1783637237.136.91632699889.982.3216165441535173.1
B1803927137.137.01654192189.382.521816622
38A1625207937.236.91482212289.182.8213163651519372.3
B1669864337.137.01536103989.283.319816532
43A1560245037.237.01427491989.783.4226162441539973.3
B1530327337.136.91398626289.382.522716397
F-Line33A1616988437.237.01486520988.982.2215165571531472.9
B1708498137.237.01570272289.582.821516355
38A1837028537.237.01684689989.983.5217166301527072.7
B1808583237.136.81641991590.284.121316575
43A1463487737.236.91337388789.283.0226164981536473.1
B1535662537.236.91403536489.282.922616583
Mean16619547.737.1536.9415213104.789.4482.94213.416491.815315.272.9

Summary of RNA-seq data.

For each library the total number of concatenated reads, median read qualities (R1 and R2), estimated mean insert length (bp), number of and percentage of aligned reads, percentage of concordant reads, and the number and percentage of observed genes (mapped reads > 1.0) and expressed genes (mean group normalized read count > 3.0) are given.

Gene expression

Approximately 89% of the quality trimmed fragments mapped uniquely to the annotated turkey gene set, and on average, 82.9% mapped concordantly (Table 1). Evidence for expression (at least one mapped read) in at least one treatment group was observed for 18,917 genes (average 16,491 per group, 78.5% of the turkey gene set) with a mean depth of 464 ± 28.9 (SE) reads/gene (Table S1). Using an expression cutoff for the average number of mapped reads = 3.0 resulted in 16,582 experiment-wise expressed genes (tRNAs excluded) with 14,038 shared in common among the six treatment groups. Within treatment groups, the mean number of expressed genes (average # of mapped reads ≥ 3.0) ranged from 15,193 to 15,399 and included on average 72.9% of the turkey gene set (Table 1).

Variation among groups was evaluated by principal component analysis (PCA) of normalized read counts (Figure 1). Treatment groups clustered distinctly by Temp/Time within the first two principal components explaining ~98% of the observed variation. The relationships among treatment groups shown by PCA, with clustering by incubation temperature then turkey type, were reiterated in the hierarchical clustering of groups by Euclidean distance (Figure S1). Replicate treatment pairs clustered together as nearest neighbors, supporting the pooling of replicates for expression analyses.

Figure 1

Distribution of expressed genes (unique and shared) among treatment groups is summarized in Table 2. The number of uniquely expressed genes in the satellite cells was higher at both cold and hot temperatures as compared to control (38°C) in both lines. In paired comparisons between temperature treatments, the number of uniquely expressed genes was higher in both the cold and hot treatments than the control temperature (38°C). Within temperature, 14,903 expressed genes were shared on average among the lines (Table 2). Numbers of uniquely expressed genes were comparable being higher for the RBC2 line cells at 33 and 43°C (414 and 437, respectively) but higher for the F-line cells at 38°C (459).

Table 2

ComparisonGroupsExpressed genesShared genesUnique genes /groupFDR < 0.05|Log2FC| > 1.0|Log2FC| > 2.0
Cold33R vs. 38R15,88514,659692/5345,9632,608852 (0.337)
33F vs. 38F15,90114,683631/5878,6783,027969 (0.372)
Hot43R vs. 38R15,93314,695704/4987,1603,355845 (0.788)
43F vs. 38F15,95114,757607/5139,0392,905703 (0.752)
LINE
33F vs. 33R15,72814,937414/37787311623 (0.130)
38F vs. 38R15,65214,811382/459111 (0.000)
43F vs. 43R15,80114,962437/4021,81831852 (0.500)

Summary of gene expression and significant differential expression (DE) in pair-wise comparisons of differentiating cells.

For each comparison of the treatment groups (Temperature, 33, 38, or 43°C; Line, RBC2 or F), the total number of expressed, shared, and uniquely expressed genes, the number of genes with significant FDR p-value, and the numbers of significant genes also with |Log2 fold change| > 1.0 and > 2.0 are given. Only those genes with treatment group mean normalized read counts > 3.0 are included as expressed. Numbers in parentheses equal the proportion of up-regulated genes.

Ordering and classification of the genes expressed at the control incubation temperature (38°C, Table S2) defines the baseline cellular processes of the satellite cells after 48 h of differentiation. The majority of gene products (68%) expressed by the RBC2 and F-line satellite cells is characterized as nuclear or cytoplasmic proteins (Figure S2). The largest represented functional class of gene products (49%, designated as other) included primarily structural proteins with enzymes (20%) and transcriptional regulators (9%) comprising the next two major groups. A Comparison Analysis between the RBC2 and F-line groups at 38°C was conducted using the normalized read counts for the 8,000 highest expressed genes from the 11,615 gene IDs mapped in the IPA database. The top Metabolic pathways included the tRNA charging pathway (33 of 39 pathway genes associated) and D-myo inositol pathway (Table 3). Myo-inositol is the structural basis for a number of secondary messengers in eukaryotic cells. The top two Signaling pathways included protein ubiquitination (177 of 255 genes associated) and EIF2 signaling (142 of 194 genes). Ubiquitination pathways primarily include the tagging of proteins for degradation by the proteasome whereas the eIF2 initiation complex regulates both global and specific mRNA translation in response to stress-related signals.

Table 3

RBC2F-Line
Metabolic Pathways−log (p-value)Ratio−log (p-value)Ratio
tRNA charging8.9200.8468.9500.846
Superpathway of inositol phosphate compounds6.8700.5407.2600.545
3-phosphoinositide degradation6.8600.5826.5400.575
Colanic acid building blocks biosynthesis6.0501.0006.0701.000
3-phosphoinositide biosynthesis5.9600.5436.0200.543
D-myo-inositol (1,4,5,6)-tetrakisphosphate biosynthesis5.7200.5745.7700.574
D-myo-inositol (3,4,5,6)-tetrakisphosphate biosynthesis5.7200.5745.7700.574
D-myo-inositol-5-phosphate metabolism4.9300.5444.9800.544
Superpathway of D-myo-inositol (1,4,5)-trisphosphate metabolism4.8600.8005.7500.840
Fatty Acid β-oxidation I4.2000.7193.6000.688
Valine degradation I4.1300.8334.1400.833
Pyridoxal 5′-phosphate salvage pathway3.6600.5943.6800.594
Superpathway of cholesterol biosynthesis3.6500.7143.6700.714
Isoleucine degradation I3.5900.8573.6000.857
TCA Cycle II (Eukaryotic)3.4600.7393.4700.739
D-myo-inositol (1,4,5)-trisphosphate degradation3.3000.7784.1400.833
D-myo-inositol (1,3,4)-trisphosphate biosynthesis3.2100.7503.9900.800
Phosphatidylglycerol biosynthesis II (Non-plastidic)3.0800.6923.0900.692
Salvage pathways of pyrimidine ribonucleotides2.8500.5272.8800.527
GDP-mannose biosynthesis2.5901.0002.6001.000
SIGNALING PATHWAYS
Protein ubiquitination pathway25.4000.69425.5000.694
EIF2 signaling24.1000.73224.2000.732
Regulation of eIF4 and p70S6K signaling18.4000.72018.5000.720
mTOR signaling16.0000.65816.6000.663
NRF2-mediated oxidative stress response15.5000.65815.1000.653
Estrogen receptor signaling12.6000.68812.7000.688
Molecular mechanisms of cancer12.6000.55312.7000.553
Hereditary breast cancer signaling12.4000.66912.5000.669
Aldosterone signaling in epithelial cells12.3000.64512.4000.645
Huntington's disease signaling11.5000.58911.6000.589
Role of BRCA1 in DNA damage response10.7000.74410.8000.744
PI3K/AKT signaling10.4000.66110.5000.661
Death receptor signaling9.0900.6859.7300.696
Integrin signaling9.0000.5719.8300.580
AMPK8.6600.5828.7300.582
Protein kinase A signaling8.6300.5158.4600.513
Mitotic roles of polo-like kinase8.4400.7278.4800.727
Glioma signaling8.4200.6458.4700.645
HIPPO signaling8.0400.6748.0900.674
Apidogenesis pathway8.0000.6128.0600.612

Twenty most significant canonical pathways expressed in satellite cell cultures at 38°C after 48 h of differentiation.

RNA-Seq affords the opportunity to gain new insights into temporal gene expression patterns of differentiating satellite cells, particularly with respect to muscle fiber-type-specific proteins. Although, the adult turkey p. major muscle comprises almost exclusively Type IIa (fast-contracting) muscle fibers, the satellite cells in this study which had undergone differentiation for 48 h, primarily expressed mRNAs corresponding to cardiac or slow-contracting sarcomeric and sarcoplasmic reticulum protein isoforms (Table S1). For example, the dominant myosin heavy chain based on number of reads were MYH7B (slow/tonic, cardiac isoform) and the non-muscle isoforms MYH9 and MHY10. Likewise, the cardiac or slow-contracting muscle isoforms of actin (ACTC1), troponin C (TNNC1), troponin T (TNNT2), the sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum calcium ATPase (ATP2A2), and calsequestrin (CASQ2) predominate relative to their respective fast-contracting muscle isoforms. The adult isoforms of the myosin heavy chains associated with the myofibril (e.g., MYH1, MYH2), were not observed although it is possible that there are reads associated with gene loci that have not yet been annotated. Nevertheless, it is readily apparent that in direct comparisons between fast skeletal muscle isoforms and slow or cardiac isoforms, e.g., actin and the troponin subunits, the slow/cardiac isoforms are generally present in greater abundance.

Differential expression

Gaussian-based ANOVA found 12,395 genes with significant (FDR p-val < 0.05) experiment-wise differential expression (Figure S3). Seven two-way contrasts were generated based on temperature treatment (cold and hot) and line (RBC2 and F). More significant differentially expressed (DE) genes were identified in the temperature contrasts than between genetic lines within temperature (Table 2, Table S4) and the majority of DE genes were unique to treatment groups (temperature/line; Figure S4).

On average, more genes were significantly affected by cold (33°C) treatment than by heat (43°C; Table 2). Comparison of the cold treated (33°C) to controls (38°C) found a greater number of DE genes in the F-line cells compared to the RBC2 cells (Figure 2, Figure S4). However, the opposite was observed in the 43 vs. 38°C comparison where a greater number of genes were significantly different in the RBC2 cells. Interestingly, the proportion of upregulated genes was ~2-fold higher in the heat-treated cells (0.77 vs. 0.36; Table 2). In the 33 vs. 38°C comparison (Figure 2), 571 (45.7%) of the DE genes were common to the two genetic lines and the number of unique DE genes was higher in the F-line cells compared to the RBC2 (398 [31.8%] and 281 [22.5%], respectively). Fewer DE genes (381, 32.6%) were shared between lines in the 43 vs. 38°C comparison, and the number of unique DE genes was higher in the RBC2 cells compared to the F-line (464 [39.8%] and 281 [27.6%], respectively).

Figure 2

The majority of DE genes identified in the treatment comparisons were unique to treatment groups (temperature/line; Figure S4). The 50 significant DE genes with the greatest expression change in each comparison are listed in Table S4. Prominent in the 33 vs. 38°C comparisons are the number of myosin-related genes that were significantly down regulated in the satellite cells. The gene with the greatest expression change was neuropeptide Y (NPY) with an average Log2FC = −10.63. In mammals, NPY is produced mainly by neurons in the brain and autonomic nervous system and can stimulate growth of adipose tissue (Wang et al., 2007).

Statistical overrepresentation tests (PANTHER) of genes differentially expressed between the 33 and 38°C found greatest enrichment for the GO Biological Processes of myofibril assembly, regulation of calcium ion import, muscle contraction and muscle development (Table 4). Greatest enrichment of Cellular Components included the troponin complex, muscle thin filament and myofilament, whereas actin and cytoskeletal protein binding were included in the top significantly enriched Molecular Functions. Myofibril assembly (over 13-fold enrichment), tropomyosin binding (28.97 x) and troponin complex (41.39 x) were the top overrepresented categories among the 457 DE genes shared among the F and RBC2 lines in the 33 vs. 38°C comparison. In contrast, overrepresentation tests of genes differentially expressed between the 43 and 38°C found very few significantly enriched categories and low enrichment values (Table 5).

Table 4

Biological processGallus gallus (15,789)Turkey DEGs (395 of 400)Expectedover /underFold EnrichmentP-value
Myofibril assembly (GO:0030239)3880.96+8.314.46E-02
Regulation of calcium ion import (GO:0090279)56101.42+7.051.40E-02
Muscle contraction (GO:0006936)106162.69+5.961.38E-04
Striated muscle cell development (GO:0055002)83122.1+5.711.22E-02
Muscle system process (GO:0003012)131183.32+5.427.58E-05
Muscle cell development (GO:0055001)93122.36+5.093.81E-02
Striated muscle cell differentiation (GO:0051146)123143.12+4.492.73E-02
Regulation of metal ion transport (GO:0010959)167164.23+3.784.95E-02
Striated muscle tissue development (GO:0014706)186174.71+3.614.76E-02
Muscle tissue development (GO:0060537)199185.04+3.572.97E-02
Muscle structure development (GO:0061061)278247.04+3.411.82E-03
Regulation of ion transport (GO:0043269)303247.68+3.138.12E-03
Anatomical structure formation in morphogenesis (GO:0048646)6594116.7+2.461.03E-03
System process (GO:0003008)7894919.99+2.456.09E-05
Circulatory system development (GO:0072359)5293213.4+2.394.33E-02
Cardiovascular system development (GO:0072358)5293213.4+2.394.33E-02
Tissue development (GO:0009888)9615124.35+2.093.76E-03
regulation of multicellular organismal development (GO:2000026)1,0175225.76+2.028.59E-03
Regulation of transport (GO:0051049)1,0565226.75+1.942.50E-02
Regulation of multicellular organismal process (GO:0051239)1,5557639.39+1.931.32E-04
Anatomical structure morphogenesis (GO:0009653)1,3906635.21+1.873.73E-03
Regulation of developmental process (GO:0050793)1,3696434.68+1.859.56E-03
Animal organ development (GO:0048513)1,6977942.99+1.845.10E-04
System development (GO:0048731)2,36010859.79+1.812.23E-06
Regulation of localization (GO:0032879)1,4976837.93+1.791.15E-02
Multicellular organismal process (GO:0032501)3,42915386.87+1.763.04E-10
Single-multicellular organism process (GO:0044707)3,05013677.27+1.762.03E-08
Multicellular organism development (GO:0007275)2,61411666.22+1.752.42E-06
Anatomical structure development (GO:0048856)2,93612974.38+1.732.81E-07
Single-organism developmental process (GO:0044767)3,09113178.31+1.672.11E-06
Developmental process (GO:0032502)3,12213179.09+1.664.10E-06
Cell communication (GO:0007154)2,93311474.3+1.535.40E-03
Single organism signaling (GO:0044700)2,87211172.76+1.531.06E-02
Signaling (GO:0023052)2,87511172.84+1.521.12E-02
Signal transduction (GO:0007165)2,68010367.9+1.523.77E-02
Response to stimulus (GO:0050896)4,290150108.68+1.382.62E-02
Single-organism process (GO:0044699)7,871264199.4+1.323.09E-07
Regulation of biological process (GO:0050789)6,727224170.42+1.312.97E-04
Single-organism cellular process (GO:0044763)6,748221170.95+1.291.97E-03
Regulation of cellular process (GO:0050794)6,374207161.48+1.281.67E-02
Biological regulation (GO:0065007)7,227231183.09+1.266.16E-03
Biological_process (GO:0008150)11,618333294.33+1.131.81E-02
Unclassified (UNCLASSIFIED)4,17167105.670.630.00E+00
CELLULAR COMPONENT
Troponin complex (GO:0005861)740.18+22.563.62E-02
Striated muscle thin filament (GO:0005865)1760.43+13.936.09E-03
Myofilament (GO:0036379)1860.46+13.168.40E-03
A band (GO:0031672)2160.53+11.281.99E-02
Sarcomere (GO:0030017)110252.79+8.973.33E-13
Contractile fiber part (GO:0044449)120253.04+8.222.33E-12
Myofibril (GO:0030016)131263.32+7.831.95E-12
Contractile fiber (GO:0043292)138263.5+7.446.43E-12
I band (GO:0031674)77141.95+7.181.87E-05
Receptor complex (GO:0043235)236205.98+3.353.97E-03
Proteinaceous extracellular matrix (GO:0005578)238206.03+3.324.49E-03
Extracellular matrix (GO:0031012)305247.73+3.111.54E-03
Plasma membrane part (GO:0044459)1,4426736.53+1.831.09E-03
Plasma membrane (GO:0005886)2,5619764.88+1.52.40E-02
Cell periphery (GO:0071944)2,6519967.16+1.473.39E-02
Intrinsic component of membrane (GO:0031224)3,87713498.22+1.363.72E-02
Membrane part (GO:0044425)4,536154114.92+1.341.69E-02
Cellular component (GO:0005575)12,385347313.76+1.111.41E-02
Intracellular membrane-bounded organelle (GO:0043231)6,617119167.640.713.46E-04
Unclassified (UNCLASSIFIED)3,4045386.240.610.00E+00
Nucleus (GO:0005634)4,19064106.150.63.67E-04
Organelle lumen (GO:0043233)2,3502859.540.479.99E-04
Intracellular organelle lumen (GO:0070013)2,3502859.540.479.99E-04
Membrane-enclosed lumen (GO:0031974)2,3502859.540.479.99E-04
Nuclear lumen (GO:0031981)2,1292553.940.462.68E-03
Nuclear part (GO:0044428)2,4652662.450.422.26E-05
Ribonucleoprotein complex (GO:1990904)518113.12<0.22.39E-02
Intracellular ribonucleoprotein complex (GO:0030529)518113.12<0.22.39E-02
MOLECULAR FUNCTION
Actin binding (GO:0003779)285227.22+3.051.07E-02
Cytoskeletal protein binding (GO:0008092)6004215.2+2.769.00E-06
Calcium ion binding (GO:0005509)4933012.49+2.42.41E-02
Transmembrane receptor activity (GO:0099600)6903817.48+2.171.60E-02
Receptor activity (GO:0004872)8864522.45+21.77E-02
Molecular transducer activity (GO:0060089)8864522.45+21.77E-02
Protein binding (GO:0005515)4,019148101.82+1.454.40E-04
Unclassified (UNCLASSIFIED)4,67987118.540.730.00E+00
Nucleic acid binding (GO:0003676)2,5222763.890.424.12E-05
poly(A) RNA binding (GO:0044822)835521.150.244.04E-02
RNA binding (GO:0003723)1,108628.070.215.56E-04

Summary of PANTHER Overrepresentation test of the 939 genes differentially expressed in p. major satellite cell cultures after 48 h of differentiation at 33 vs. 38°C.

Turkey DEGs were matched to the chicken gene reference list IDs for analysis in PANTHER. For each Gene Ontology category, the number of genes in the reference list and those differentially expressed in the turkey are given. Fold enrichment is the number of DE genes divided by Expected. P-values are as determined by the binomial statistic.

Table 5

Biological processGallus gallus—(15789)Turkey DEGs (248 of 249)Expectedover /underFold EnrichmentP-value
Animal organ development (GO:0048513)1,6975226.76+1.941.37E-02
Single-multicellular organism process (GO:0044707)3,0508848.10+1.831.38E-05
System development (GO:0048731)2,3606737.22+1.804.76E-03
Multicellular organism development (GO:0007275)2,6147241.22+1.754.90E-03
Multicellular organismal process (GO:0032501)3,4299154.08+1.684.14E-04
Negative regulation of cellular process (GO:0048523)2,5656840.45+1.684.28E-02
Negative regulation of biological process (GO:0048519)2,7567343.46+1.681.73E-02
Single-organism developmental process (GO:0044767)3,0917948.75+1.622.24E-02
Developmental process (GO:0032502)3,1227949.24+1.603.29E-02
Biological regulation (GO:0065007)7,227151113.97+1.321.04E-02
Single-organism process (GO:0044699)7,871160124.13+1.291.94E-02
Unclassified (UNCLASSIFIED)4,1714665.780.700.00E+00
CELLULAR COMPONENT
Unclassified (UNCLASSIFIED)3,4043053.680.560.00E+00
MOLECULAR FUNCTION
Unclassified (UNCLASSIFIED)4,6795873.790.790.00E00

Summary of PANTHER Overrepresentation test of the 856 genes differentially expressed in p. major satellite cell cultures after 48 h of differentiation at 43 vs. 38°C.

Turkey DEGs were matched to the chicken gene reference list IDs for analysis in PANTHER. For each Gene Ontology category, the number of genes in the reference list and those differentially expressed in the turkey are given. Fold enrichment is the number of DE genes divided by Expected. P-values are as determined by the binomial statistic.

Analysis of DE genes in IPA outlined several temperature-induced shifts in the satellite cell transcriptomes. The top 10 canonical pathways for each temperature comparison are given in Table S5. Consistent with ongoing cellular development, many of the most significant pathways were signaling pathways. Comparison analysis across treatments identified EIF2 signaling, regulation of eIF4 and p70S6K signaling, mTOR signaling, protein ubiquitination and NRF2-mediated oxidative stress response as the most divergently altered pathways (Figure 3). In general, the first four pathways were most significantly altered in the cold treated cells (primarily by down regulation) whereas the differences seen in the NRF2-mediated OSR pathway were the result of greater bidirectional expression differences.

Figure 3

A total of 2,926 significant DE genes (|Log2FC| > 1.0) was shared among all treatment comparisons, but only 70 had |Log2FC| > 2.0 (Figure S4). The majority of these 70 genes (48) were up regulated in cells from both lines incubated at either higher (43°C) or lower temperatures (33°C) as compared to control (Table 6). In all but two genes, CD36 and GUCA1B, the directionality of the expression changes was the same for all comparisons. Expression of CD36 (thrombospondin receptor) was up regulated at 33°C (average Log2FC = 2.39) but down regulated at 43°C (average Log2FC = −2.37) compared to control. Conversely, expression of GUCA1B (guanylate cyclase activator 1B) was down regulated at 33°C (average Log2FC = −4.75) but up regulated at 43°C (average Log2FC = 3.15) compared to control. CD36 is a member of the class B scavenger receptor family of cell surface proteins and in mammals, acts to import fatty acids inside cells, whereas GUCA1B is a calcium-binding protein that activates guanylate cyclases. These two genes are also represented in the two most significant scoring gene networks identified in IPA analysis of the 70 DE genes shared among the treatment comparisons (Figure S5).

Table 6

GeneDescription33R vs. 38R33F vs. 38F43R vs. 38R43F vs. 38F
Log2FCFDRLog2FCFDRLog2FCFDRLog2FCFDR
ACTA1Actin, alpha 1, skeletal muscle−3.2052.2E-154−3.3470−2.8610−3.1930
APOA1Apolipoprotein A-I−3.1102.87E-36−3.1131.19E-45−4.2002.2E-53−2.4041.29E-28
BCANBrevican−4.0611.12E-67−3.8391.93E-40−2.3764.27E-27−2.0959.01E-45
C1QL1Complement component 1, q subcomponent-like 1−2.1332.99E-40−2.4654.61E-89−2.9428.8E-80−2.1621.15E-32
CCDC69Coiled-coil domain containing 69−5.3488.31E-17−4.0159.4E-110−3.7007.16E-11−2.1383.22E-95
CD36CD36 molecule (thrombospondin receptor)2.3002.05E-462.4799.79E-46−2.6063.59E-17−2.1313.52E-27
DRC7Dynein regulatory complex subunit 7−4.2102.88E-16−3.9814.15E-24−2.2597.2E-09−2.0733.98E-12
EVCEllis van Creveld syndrome3.0260.0053232.5700.0001063.1190.0009462.0240.007842
FABP3Fatty acid binding protein 3, muscle and heart−5.2847.79E-35−4.8587.79E-41−3.0201.97E-18−3.9592.29E-36
GUCA1BGuanylate cyclase activator 1B (retina)−3.2282.28E-05−6.2812.68E-052.9901.44E-233.3161.18E-25
LNPEPLeucyl/cystinyl aminopeptidase2.5891.2E-072.3194.07E-133.1103.88E-162.2671.53E-12
LOC100539445Tensin-3 (TNS3)2.2690.001232.3216.04E-082.7911.56E-093.0269.17E-16
LOC100545344Myosin-7-like−4.9752.4E-142−4.7161.5E-45−2.9888.58E-75−2.1695.61E-42
LOC100547876Polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 12-like2.8230.0016672.9309.26E-072.5820.0027542.2150.001923
LOC100548077Disheveled-associated activator of morphogenesis 2 (DAAM2)2.7030.0005212.0310.0090453.2183.7E-062.3290.000755
LOC100548792Collagen alpha-1(XII) chain-like2.0611.94E-062.7202.64E-793.3331.46E-332.6524.26E-87
LOC100549353Activating signal cointegrator 1 complex subunit 3 (ASCC3)2.1273.37E-062.3794.43E-162.6991.16E-132.2761.47E-16
LOC100550192HLA class II histocompatibility antigen, DM beta chain-like (DMB2)2.2630.0036332.6486.59E-053.5864.06E-103.2662.81E-09
LOC104909264Multidrug resistance-associated protein 4-like2.2175.61E-063.4081.25E-162.2071.27E-052.3294.25E-06
LOC104909289Limbin-like2.5891.35E-063.5243.22E-092.0580.0006282.7400.000108
LOC104909397Dolichyl pyrophosphate Glc1Man9GlcNAc2 alpha-1,3-glucosyltransferase (probable)2.4640.0027522.1861.95E-063.6441.56E-102.2821.87E-07
LOC104909635Latent-transforming growth factor beta-binding protein 1-like2.8753.12E-113.0392.66E-584.0772.86E-663.7163.9E-113
LOC104909708Uncharacterized LOC104909708 (ncRNA)−3.3560.012361−3.2680.000646−2.6880.03465−3.0900.000878
LOC104909779Uncharacterized LOC104909779 (ncRNA)2.2232.66E-052.6407.28E-092.1206.87E-052.3612.74E-06
LOC104909819Uncharacterized LOC104909819 (ncRNA)−3.2760.004612−4.0310.000265−2.2140.027631−2.4830.005267
LOC104909922Unconventional myosin-VI-like3.6200.0022944.2271.24E-055.1392.25E-084.4531.39E-06
LOC104909972Uncharacterized LOC104909972 (ncRNA)2.7610.0255653.3187.03E-053.0460.0019152.9460.002409
LOC104910277Uncharacterized LOC104910277 (ncRNA)2.0470.0002652.0118.08E-063.4691.52E-143.3456.5E-30
LOC104910488Protein EFR3 homolog A-like2.2070.0010442.4782.77E-083.2421.65E-132.7021.86E-11
LOC104911116Tetraspanin-18-like2.5421.11E-082.4542.04E-163.1741.45E-162.3712.01E-15
LOC104911697Lymphocyte antigen 75-like2.3203.64E-062.7372.24E-273.0103.28E-172.4671.3E-17
LOC104912545Serine/threonine-protein kinase ATR-like2.5560.0087553.1340.0004242.5180.0042792.6650.019456
LOC104913390Multidrug resistance-associated protein 1-like3.7312.77E-063.8712.66E-123.8321.01E-063.5421.1E-09
LOC104913470Periplakin-like6.4302.91E-056.7322.38E-076.1040.0005674.8630.040654
LOC104913553Uncharacterized LOC104913553 (ncRNA)−2.0717.56E-10−2.5421.04E-24−2.1878.27E-16−3.0851.65E-42
LOC104913838Uncharacterized LOC104913838 (ncRNA)−6.9594.68E-07−3.9674.63E-07−2.3180.000899−2.5666.44E-05
LOC104914081Regulator of G-protein signaling 9-binding protein-like−3.6331.72E-96−3.7821.47E-36−4.9701.7E-110−4.2243.51E-39
LOC104914095Probable phospholipid-transporting ATPase IIA3.0830.022813.3490.0064673.2250.0180693.7940.000706
LOC104914454Importin-9-like2.0932E-072.4846.1E-182.0031.92E-092.3193.02E-15
LOC104914932Protein LAP2-like2.2531.33E-072.6141.59E-182.9781.19E-132.5057.31E-17
LOC104914983Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 28-like2.7560.0212362.8750.0329973.2900.0009054.2262.95E-05
LOC104915185Peptidyl-glycine alpha-amidating monooxygenase-like2.0292.1E-132.1941.66E-843.1245.61E-932.5043.61E-96
LOC104915209Cyclin-G-associated kinase-like2.7180.0039932.0980.0023922.9700.0005092.0780.002028
LOC104915239Solute carrier family 12 member 2-like2.4230.0046074.3861.2E-063.1723.58E-074.9798.76E-10
LOC104915240Solute carrier family 12 member 2-like2.3310.0083013.3734.27E-052.5810.0034033.3120.000191
LOC104915275Versican core protein-like2.1173.28E-072.5089.4E-194.2836.06E-453.3223.36E-41
LOC104915303Structural maintenance of chromosomes protein 2-like2.3721.45E-093.0051.51E-473.3955.32E-412.4182.86E-19
LOC104915418Uncharacterized LOC104915418 (ncRNA)2.8300.0144012.5920.0137813.1760.0007452.8610.004775
LOC104916051Uncharacterized LOC1049160512.2110.0106834.7391.72E-073.2748.48E-085.1842.35E-11
LOC104916792Uncharacterized LOC104916792 (ncRNA)2.4300.0044172.4500.0003313.1188.43E-062.3300.000822
LOC104916797Kinesin-like protein KIF20B5.5460.0124243.1310.0193255.6320.0032753.0420.030237
LOC104916915ETS translocation variant 3-like protein2.1987.61E-052.8871.53E-072.1796.09E-052.8631.6E-07
LOC104916992Uncharacterized LOC104916992 (ncRNA)−6.5652.46E-78−6.3534E-112−2.3209.47E-22−2.0222.86E-73
LOC104917145Uncharacterized LOC104917145 (ncRNA)2.1475.47E-052.6802.39E-092.4431.16E-062.3821.55E-10
LOC104917155Alpha-mannosidase 2-like3.1848.61E-063.6269.74E-234.0061.55E-143.5431.35E-21
LOC104917232Alpha-mannosidase 2-like3.3171.09E-053.1193.95E-113.5855.11E-082.8021.73E-07
LOC104917363Extended synaptotagmin-2-A-like2.1740.014893.0693.92E-122.4520.0005742.3368.58E-05
LOC104917414Uncharacterized LOC104917414 (ncRNA)3.0902.57E-063.5252.34E-092.5470.0007282.0290.020654
LOC104917580Sister chromatid cohesion protein PDS5 homolog B-like2.7805.84E-052.0522.19E-063.6032.16E-112.3072.47E-08
MKI67Marker of proliferation Ki-672.8676.91E-093.1271.48E-314.1816.74E-222.8291.9E-24
MSTNMyostatin−3.8244.36E-08−2.3821.94E-12−3.4245.62E-07−2.4805.71E-13
MTMR8Myotubularin related protein 82.1481.6E-072.4561.51E-142.2623.14E-102.1433.91E-11
MYL3Myosin, light chain 3, alkali; ventricular, skeletal, slow−6.2836.6E-130−7.3770−3.6873.26E-82−3.7050
PTGFRNProstaglandin F2 receptor inhibitor3.2914.18E-062.7401.19E-063.5361.27E-073.3003.07E-11
REEP3Receptor accessory protein 32.3635.13E-142.2019.59E-312.6466.37E-232.1244.64E-30
SLNSarcolipin−5.2261.34E-54−6.4407.03E-80−3.3352.34E-30−2.3381.23E-38
TEAD1TEA domain family member 1 (SV40 transcriptional enhancer factor)2.3571.73E-122.2599.1E-123.0781.95E-192.6545.9E-32
TNNC2Troponin C type 2 (fast)−3.3125.9E-126−3.3490−4.6507.4E-152−4.0990
TPM2Tropomyosin 2 (beta)−2.7321.51E-36−2.5411.5E-107−2.2891.47E-22−2.1639.04E-96
TSPAN10Tetraspanin 10−2.9554.44E-18−2.4323.11E-72−2.7713.98E-16−3.4853.72E-88

Common significant DE genes [FDR p-values (< 0.05), |Log2FC| >1] across treatments.

Comparisons highlighted red are up-regulated in the comparison whereas genes highlighted in green are down-regulated.

To further examine differences between the temperature treatments, the 2,926 significant DE genes (|Log2FC| > 1.0) shared among all treatment comparisons were further investigated. These represent 23.3% of the total number of DE genes identified across treatments. Of the 2,926 DE genes, 637 showed consistent directional expression change, with the 33 vs. 38°C comparisons and the 43 vs. 38°C comparisons having the same directional response in both lines. Up regulation across all treatment comparisons was observed for 407 genes whereas 141 were down regulated. Of the remaining 89 genes, 53 were down regulated by cold treatment in both lines and 36 were down regulated by heat treatment (Table 7). These include CD36 and GUCA1B discussed above. IPA analysis of these 89 genes suggests upstream effects attributed to the AHR (Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor) transcription factor, and the transforming growth factors TGFB1 and TGFB3 (Figure S6).

Table 7

33R vs. 38R33F vs. 38F43R vs. 38R43F vs. 38F
GeneDescriptionLog2FCFDR pvalLog2FCFDR pvalLog2FCFDR pvalLog2FCFDR pval
ABLIM2Actin binding LIM protein family, member 2−2.0540.001493−1.3900.0040241.3530.0015491.4184.88E-07
LOC104912064Disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 12-like−1.2310.035684−1.4470.0001511.7392.65E-071.5739.79E-13
APBA2Amyloid beta (A4) precursor protein-binding, family A, member 2−1.3190.001841−1.2747.45E-092.0411.52E-201.1351.5E-14
ARHGAP28Rho GTPase activating protein 28−1.8521.38E-05−1.6902.9E-071.5813.62E-061.1456.23E-07
ASAP3ArfGAP with SH3 domain, ankyrin repeat and PH domain 3−1.3560.001483−1.6330.0002361.1930.0001931.9317.36E-16
BCL6B-cell CLL/lymphoma 6−1.0241.31E-06−1.0798.27E-301.1711.37E-091.1771.3E-65
C8H10orf71Chromosome 8 open reading frame, human C10orf71−2.2572.07E-27−2.5311.83E-831.7863.24E-261.4301.85E-50
CDK18Cyclin-dependent kinase 18−2.2193.25E-10−1.7513.86E-111.3004.65E-081.0536.42E-09
CHST1Carbohydrate (keratan sulfate Gal-6) sulfotransferase 1−3.0573.89E-06−3.5717.87E-081.4401.37E-051.7221.83E-08
COL3A1Collagen, type III, alpha 1−2.9030−2.38201.6592.98E-121.9231.18E-27
COL4A1Collagen, type IV, alpha 1−1.6065.48E-14−1.22401.2171.83E-081.6851.24E-40
DCXDoublecortin−2.1994.6E-09−1.9872.44E-191.8153.08E-111.0731.75E-14
LOC104911002Dickkopf-related protein 3-like−2.5134.9E-08−1.4969.78E-051.6266.64E-101.7973.55E-19
LOC100540803Delta and Notch-like epidermal growth factor-related receptor−2.6020.003208−2.2780.0095681.7506.59E-051.9736.31E-07
LOC100545932Dystrobrevin alpha−1.7000.004161−2.4974.6E-061.7031.34E-061.5355.69E-08
LOC104910320Dystrobrevin alpha-like−2.4520.000109−2.0721.99E-051.3200.000511.0070.001196
LOC104910337Dystrobrevin alpha-like−2.8960.028765−2.2770.0107592.3341.68E-051.3800.001723
LOC100539830Dysferlin-like−1.6730.000158−1.4870.0013691.0950.0009611.5533.96E-07
FRAS1Fraser extracellular matrix complex subunit 1−1.7720.001852−2.5481.79E-082.2966.27E-121.1377.91E-06
GNG2Guanine nucleotide binding protein (G protein), gamma 2−1.7041.86E-06−1.4742.75E-061.1269.24E-061.1584.56E-08
GRIN2AGlutamate receptor, ionotropic, N-methyl D-aspartate 2A−2.4714.6E-12−1.8991.35E-141.1151.98E-071.3544.38E-22
GUCA1BGuanylate cyclase activator 1B (retina)−3.2282.28E-05−6.2812.68E-052.9901.44E-233.3161.18E-25
LOC104909294Hypermethylated in cancer 1 protein−2.2812.93E-05−3.4896.51E-101.8762.64E-092.2331.28E-29
LOC100541783Hypermethylated in cancer 1 protein-like−1.9770.027443−3.1050.0024992.3803.83E-092.6842.86E-15
INHAInhibin, alpha−5.3461.21E-15−6.1154.21E-201.2052.72E-051.1802.92E-07
LOC100547979Junctophilin-1−4.1751.97E-17−3.9047.22E-232.1982.21E-191.7232.29E-23
LOC104917153Small conductance calcium-activated potassium channel protein 3−1.1030.027791−1.3680.0005911.2410.0001991.2341.4E-06
KLBKlotho beta−2.0084.52E-14−2.1141.07E-431.0603.28E-071.0491.72E-16
KLHL31Kelch-like family member 31−2.2984.77E-08−3.7521.06E-192.0701.16E-121.2845.06E-08
LEF1Lymphoid enhancer-binding factor 1−5.8040.002693−4.1070.000121.6840.0030381.9571.61E-06
LHFPL3Lipoma HMGIC fusion partner-like 3−1.8920.001752−1.1440.0053481.3910.0001411.7886.76E-14
LOC104912085Uncharacterized LOC−1.8056.64E-11−1.7913.01E-071.7954.69E-151.2705.13E-06
LOC104914708Uncharacterized LOC−3.0414.19E-08−2.4911.47E-161.4148.5E-051.5433.96E-23
LTBP2Latent transforming growth factor beta binding protein 2−2.3554.6E-44−2.4654.81E-431.5352.35E-241.8545.97E-21
LOC104909252Myosin-3-like−6.6001.56E-05−6.6936.28E-071.0710.0396321.1950.003104
LOC100543020Myosin-7-like−3.8281.32E-05−3.4090.0002411.1920.0074261.2210.004462
LOC100549331Myosin-7-like−5.4674.06E-71−6.41201.2753.75E-061.3906.35E-31
LOC100544354Uncharacterized LOC−5.3970.014658−5.7020.0028331.9540.0027831.4480.009527
LOC104914128Uncharacterized LOC−2.8610.00076−3.0301.8E-051.4560.0011951.6987.65E-09
NFATC2Nuclear factor of activated T-cells, cytoplasmic, calcineurin-dependent 2−2.4760.020677−2.1230.0036881.7790.0007111.6752.65E-05
OASL2′–5′-Oligoadenylate synthetase-like−1.9091.5E-08−1.5544.62E-092.3511.3E-292.3337.81E-66
OPCMLOpioid binding protein/cell adhesion molecule-like−2.6421.09E-11−1.6801.43E-211.2702.36E-062.3385.65E-21
P2RY1Purinergic receptor P2Y, G-protein coupled, 1−1.5070.000988−1.1400.0130831.2596.78E-051.9326.03E-16
PALMDPalmdelphin−2.5713.06E-05−4.1405.6E-091.5685.2E-061.6132.51E-08
LOC104914006Receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase T-like−2.3851.73E-12−2.6432E-282.3891.61E-331.8805.84E-89
LOC104914794Iporin-like−1.5513.48E-05−1.6182.51E-101.5099.48E-071.3101.39E-12
RYR1Ryanodine receptor 1 (skeletal)−2.0169.81E-05−2.5230.0004881.3612.2E-051.8941.47E-09
LOC104916851Ryanodine receptor 1-like−1.2970.01007−2.0037.49E-061.4699.89E-061.8751.34E-17
LOC104917345Ryanodine receptor 1-like−1.5490.003033−1.7270.000291.2080.0010461.7773.21E-13
LOC104913331Putative E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase SH3RF2−5.3980.013363−6.0230.0001572.0910.0004341.1320.035376
SHROOM1Shroom family member 1−2.3877.34E-07−2.0963.88E-071.2634.57E-051.4827.73E-11
LOC100546217protein TENP−5.0450.038689−4.9470.0432681.7670.0215513.3041.16E-12
TIMP3TIMP metallopeptidase inhibitor 3−1.5820−1.68301.6905.37E-331.4228.26E-31
LOC100542775Alpha-2-macroglobulin-like protein 12.4077.18E-092.2522.22E-11−1.9900.040101−2.3810.00191
C1QTNF4C1q and tumor necrosis factor related protein 41.1061.2E-151.1688.66E-38−1.1072.2E-12−1.0700
CD36CD36 molecule (thrombospondin receptor)2.3002.05E-462.4799.79E-46−2.6063.59E-17−2.1313.52E-27
CNDP1Carnosine dipeptidase 1 (metallopeptidase M20 family)1.1170.0076581.4131.9E-05−3.7501.16E-07−1.8820.000797
LOC100550279HLA class II histocompatibility antigen, DM beta chain-like1.6274.24E-291.9286.54E-50−1.3390−2.6942.97E-91
ENTPD3Ectonucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase 31.0020.0121461.0793.4E-05−1.3950.005746−1.2410.001609
ESAMEndothelial cell adhesion molecule1.9581.42E-072.1165.48E-25−1.3390.012003−2.2919.08E-08
ETV7ets variant 72.1602.67E-061.6645.7E-08−2.3420.003252−2.1010.000492
LOC104917139Germin-like protein subfamily 2 member 21.6270.0001981.1416.34E-05−5.2944.91E-09−3.6981.06E-09
LOC100539100Guanylate cyclase soluble subunit beta-2-like2.0636.72E-211.7082.8E-25−1.2090.000197−1.0814.92E-05
LOC100543128Histone H3-like1.4871.79E-071.1691.34E-10−2.7555.02E-09−2.4802.18E-18
IL18BPInterleukin 18 binding protein1.5130.0005351.3254.57E-06−2.0870.000679−2.4093.58E-06
LOC104916207Kallikrein-8-like1.2840.0001191.2156.35E-06−1.3040.006723−1.5370.000479
LRATLecithin retinol acyltransferase (phosphatidylcholine–retinol O-acyltransferase)1.2191.27E-051.1784.02E-10−1.3020.000548−1.0280.000202
LOC100549167Mannose-binding protein A-like1.6700.0029091.2320.010338−3.6920.004571−3.6950.00115
MTNR1AMelatonin receptor 1A1.5150.0008771.1530.0135−2.0980.009624−1.6110.023993
LOC104909506Uncharacterized LOC1.5670.0067581.6955.46E-05−2.7460.021177−2.9320.002457
LOC104910409Uncharacterized LOC1.0670.0035541.1937.65E-05−2.3857.52E-06−1.1600.010109
LOC104911590Uncharacterized LOC1.3192.43E-061.1039.54E-09−1.9403.03E-07−2.0728.46E-11
LOC104912270Uncharacterized LOC1.4003.32E-111.2302.85E-15−1.3356.18E-05−1.1164.73E-08
LOC104912544Uncharacterized LOC1.3322.14E-051.3048.93E-10−1.5500.000542−1.9632.5E-08
LOC104913567Uncharacterized LOC1.2401.61E-141.0296.62E-35−1.3282.57E-11−1.1373.08E-26
LOC104913826Uncharacterized LOC1.5151.98E-221.5644.58E-37−1.1099.44E-07−1.1045.72E-11
LOC104914493uncharacterized LOC1.4180.0013131.5165E-05−1.8690.007214−2.3200.002089
NOXO1NADPH oxidase organizer 11.6531.97E-101.3577.28E-17−2.1241.47E-09−1.5916.04E-09
NTSR1Neurotensin receptor 1 (high affinity)1.2090.0296191.3090.001145−2.5170.002856−2.1400.004664
PCBP3Poly(rC) binding protein 31.5278.42E-091.4068.33E-16−1.4917.04E-05−1.5214.59E-08
PIGMPhosphatidylinositol glycan anchor biosynthesis, class M1.1070.0003631.0954.43E-07−1.3240.000604−1.0230.000899
PLS1Plastin 11.2512.14E-091.4731.37E-32−2.1793.22E-15−1.6913.69E-20
PTGR1Prostaglandin reductase 12.0467.33E-092.2612.27E-14−1.9370.001524−2.1690.00077
RANBP17RAN binding protein 171.8356.16E-081.0385.8E-05−1.3910.017844−2.8618.69E-10
SERPINF2Serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade F (alpha-2 antiplasmin, pigment epithelium derived factor), member 21.3952.6E-161.1631.15E-27−1.2071.55E-08−1.0961.28E-14
SH2D4ASH2 domain containing 4A1.3146.2E-071.3718.49E-13−1.8282.37E-07−2.3671.25E-11
SH2D5SH2 domain containing 51.1080.0190731.0630.00494−2.3190.000812−1.1710.030757
SH3GLB2SH3-domain GRB2-like endophilin B21.3805.63E-211.0651.78E-49−1.0957.41E-11−1.3453.32E-40
LOC104915044spErm-associated antigen 4 protein-like2.1852.89E-061.6441.1E–05−3.9670.000862−2.0100.007625

Common DE genes [FDR p-values (< 0.05), |Log2FC| >1.0] showing consistent directional change by treatment.

Comparisons highlighted red are up regulated in the comparison whereas genes highlighted in green are down regulated.

Effects of selection (line differences)

Comparisons between lines within temperature treatment found relatively few DE genes at the three incubation temperatures (Table 2, Figure 4) and the majority were down regulated in the RBC2 cells. Interestingly at the control temperature (38°C), only a single gene, Trans-2,3-Enoyl-CoA Reductase-Like (TECRL), showed significant DE between lines. This gene is a protein coding regulatory gene that catalyzes an oxidation-reduction (redox) reaction and is thought to be involved in the fatty acid biosynthesis pathway. This gene also had significant DE between lines at 33 and 43°C (Table 7). In all cases TECRL was down regulated in the F line vs. RBC2 (average Log2FC = −6.96).

Figure 4

In contrast to the control temperature, the numbers of genes where the cold (33°C) and hot (43°C) treatments significantly affected expression were considerably higher (Table 2). At 33°C, 873 genes showed significant FDR p-values with 116 also having |Log2FC| > 1.0. Of these 23 had |Log2FC| > 2.0 with the majority (87%) being down regulated in the F line compared to the RBC2 cells. Fifteen of the 23 genes were unique to the 33°C temperature comparison and 7 were shared with the 43°C comparison (Figure 4, Table 8). Included in the group of 15 unique genes were; arf-GAP with coiled-coil, ANK repeat and PH domain-containing protein 1-like (LOC104916358), Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) 16 (ARHGEF16), carbamoyl-phosphate synthase 1, mitochondrial (CPS1), neutrophil cytosolic factor 1 (NCF1), tocopherol (alpha) transfer protein (TTPA), histamine N-methyltransferase-like (LOC100542432), receptor tyrosine-protein kinase erbB-3-like (LOC100546071), fibrocystin-like (LOC104910058), semaphorin-6C-like (LOC104916327), and 6 uncharacterized loci (LOC104909501, LOC104910046, LOC104910133, LOC104911073, LOC104912259, LOC104916656). With the exception of LOC104911073, all were down regulated in the F-line cells. Although, the specific function of many of these genes are not known, they may have roles in such diverse processes as protein-protein and protein-lipid interactions, the removal of excess urea from cells, the regulation of vitamin E levels and secretion of vitamin E from hepatocytes to circulating lipoproteins. In regards to muscle biology, semaphorin-6C-like has been found to be concentrated at neuromuscular junctions suggesting a role in neuromuscular communication (Svensson et al., 2008).

Table 8

33°C38°C43°C
DEGs in “F vs. RBC2” at all tempsLog2FCFDR p-valLog2FCFDR p-valLog2FCFDR p-val
TECRLTrans-2,3-enoyl-CoA reductase-like−4.1411E-07−10.5690.0037668−6.1706.44E−114
DEGs IN “F vs. RBC2” AT 33° AND 43°C BUT NOT AT 38°C
CNGA3Cyclic nucleotide gated channel alpha 32.7400.00308451.7411.0004.0900.0007882
COL24A1Collagen, type XXIV, alpha 1−2.8151.983E-06−2.7101.000−2.8518.81E−10
LOC100539697Integrin beta-like protein 12.9980.03189331.0241.0003.0960.0088252
LOC104915513Histone deacetylase 7-like−3.8130.0051096−5.8041.000−4.7034.932E−07
LOC104917072Zinc finger protein 502-like−3.9632.294E-06−2.8461.000−5.9820.0010235
MUC3AMucin 3A, cell surface associated−6.2180.0065859−4.0821.000−6.3381.051E−23
ROBO2Roundabout, axon guidance receptor, homolog 2 (Drosophila)−3.4563.467E-05−1.7951.000−2.6540.0011681

Significant DE genes in between-line comparisons [FDR p-values (< 0.05), |Log2FC| >2.0] that were shared within temperature (see Figure 4).

Comparisons highlighted red are up-regulated in the comparison whereas genes highlighted in green are down-regulated.

Greater differential expression between the F and RBC2 cells was observed at 43°C (Table 2). Here the total number of DE genes (1818) was more than twice that observed at 33°C. In total 318 genes had |Log2FC| > 1.0 and of 52 had |Log2FC| > 2.0. Of these 52 genes, 44 were unique to this temperature comparison (Figure 4) and the directionality of expression changes was balanced with half of the genes being up regulated and half down regulated. Ten of these genes are annotated as uncharacterized loci. However, 14 (ALDH1A3, B4GALT6, CD55, CYGB, ENPP2, GREM1, NPY, NRTN, PKHD1, RAC2, RARB, RSAD2, SLIT3, and WASF3) co-occur in an IPA gene network corresponding to the processes of cell morphology, cellular assembly, organization, and development and 8 genes (ANKS4B, CAPN9, CYP26B1, GALNT3, PXDN, RASD2, RPS4X, SPON1, and SLC7A14) co-occur in a gene network corresponding to the processes of cellular movement, cell cycle and morphology. Interesting loci in these groups include genes involved in glycolipid biosynthesis (B4GALT6, Takizawa et al., 1999) down regulated in F-line cells, genes involved in regulating organogenesis, body patterning, cell and tissue differentiation [GREM1 (Michos et al., 2004) and RARB (Hauksdottir et al., 2003)], and NPY a neurotransmitter with regulatory functions in bone homeostasis (Gu et al., 2016). The latter 3 genes were all upregulated in the F-line cells.

Discussion

Muscle satellite cells are self-renewing and give rise to differentiated cell types, thus being true stem cells. Satellite cells and myofibers are of the same origin, being derived from somites (Armand et al., 1983). In mice, satellite cells are first identified morphologically toward the end of fetal development lying underneath the forming basement membrane (Ontell and Kozeka, 1984). They are the only undifferentiated cells present in the muscle at birth and during early postnatal growth, and are the primary source of myonuclei for skeletal muscle growth (Sherwood et al., 2004). During posthatch development in the chicken, satellite cells diversify in cell fate, with some cells entering quiescence (Halevy et al., 2004). In adult muscle, quiescent cells continue to provide nuclei for muscle hypertrophy and repair (Zammit et al., 2006; Zammit, 2008).

The function of satellite cells is modulated by the cellular microenvironment and quiescent satellite cells are identifiable and being both PAX7 and MYF5 positive. The state of satellite cells is defined by antagonistic Notch and Wnt signaling, with Notch maintaining PAX7 and Wnt signaling driving MYOD expression through beta-catenin (Fujimaki et al., 2013). Activation of satellite cells is thus marked by the onset of MYOD expression, downregulation of PAX7 and the subsequent increase in myogenin that marks the commitment of the activated cell to differentiation (Zammit, 2008).

Thermal challenge of the turkey satellite cells had no significant effect on expression of PAX7 in either the cold or heat-treated cells. Likewise, no significant expression differences were observed for MYOD1, and MYF5 was only slightly downregulated in the heat-treated RBC2 cells. However, myogenin (MYOG, LOC100303673), was significantly down regulated in the cold treated cells (33°C) of both the RBC2 and F-line compared to controls (38°C) (Log2FC = −2.17 and −2.30, respectively). In addition, myocyte enhancer factors MEF2B, MEF2C, and MEF2D were significantly downregulated in cold treated cells (Log2FC = −3.04, −2.43, and −0.95, respectively, for RBC2 line and −2.75, −4.48, and −0.60 for F line, respectively. This suggests that decreased temperature can directly influence satellite cell differentiation by acting at the level of gene transcription. In the heat-treated cells (43°C), MYOG was slightly downregulated (Log2FC = −1.11 and −1.06). This result is counter to a previous study using the same dissociated cell culture system that found increased MYOG expression, as measured by qPCR, in cells incubated at temperatures above 38°C (Clark et al., 2016a). However, expression of MYOG in that study was conducted after 72 h of differentiation as opposed to 48 h as in the present study. Satellite cells from both the RBC2 and F lines differentiate faster and produce larger myotubes at higher temperatures with slower growth at lower temperatures (Clark et al., 2016a). This is consistent with the RNAseq results in that many muscle-associated genes were among the genes with the greatest down regulation in cold-treated cells (33°C).

The gene MEF2B was also down regulated in heat-treated cells (Log2FC = −1.52 and −1.54 for RBC2 and F lines, respectively), whereas MEF2D was modestly upregulated (Log2FC = 0.92 and 1.15). Myocyte enhancer factor 2 proteins play key roles as transcriptional regulators of skeletal muscle development as well as myofibrillar gene expression, fiber type control, and glucose regulation (Richter and Hargreaves, 2013). Myocyte enhancer factor 2c binds to myogenin to activate skeletal muscle differentiation (Molketin et al., 1995). Moreover, recent work by Anderson et al. (2015) demonstrated that MEF2C knockout mice had significantly reduced body weight compared to controls beginning at day 10 and persisting to day 52. Reduced MEF2C expression observed at cold temperatures could be a factor in the extensive down regulation of other genes associated with sarcomeric gene expression as well as genes associated with carbohydrate metabolism and reduced rate of differentiation observed by Clark et al. (2016a).

In addition to maintaining PAX7, Notch may also signal satellite cells to stop proliferating (Conboy and Rando, 2002). The transcription factor prospero homeobox 1 (PROX1) appears to be essential for myoblast differentiation in that has a bidirectional interaction with Notch1. High Notch activity inhibits PROX1, which in turn represses Notch1 signaling (Kivelä et al., 2016). PROX1 is thought to regulate muscle phenotype via NFAT (nuclear factor of activated T cells). PROX1 was up regulated in the heat-treated turkey cells (Log2FC = 1.82 and 1.32 in the RBC2 and F line, respectively) consistent with enhanced differentiation.

The suggested upstream effects on AHR (Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor) transcription factor, and the transforming growth factors TGFB1 and TGFB3 observed in comparison of the challenged cells are of interest because of the consistent directionality of expression changes and shared significance observed across treatment comparisons in the turkey satellite cells. Of particular interest is the effect of TGFB1 on genes like NFATC2. Both NFATC2 and the related NFATC3 are important transcription factors involved in muscle growth and differentiation. In the cold treated cells, NFATC2 was downregulated but modestly upregulated in the heat comparisons. These genes may also be affected by temporal/spatial calcium-signaling. In differentiating satellite cell, calcium enters the cytoplasm via TRPC channels. TRPC1 was modestly upregulated in cold but not hot-treated cells. Calcium increases translocation of both NFATC2 and NFATC3 to the nucleus. Increased translocation of NFATC2 and NFATC3 leads to increased expression of MYOD (Liu and Schneider, 2014).

In addition to TRPC channels, differentiating satellite cells beginning to express proteins responsible for regulation of Ca2+ homeostasis, including channel proteins, Ca2+-pumps, Ca2+-storage proteins, and proteins the regulate the activity of channels and pumps. These proteins are localized to the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) and the sarcolemma. The SR calcium release channels or ryanodine receptors RYR1 and RYR3 serve as conduits for Ca2+ to enter the sarcoplasm from the lumen of the sarcoplasmic reticulum (Rossi and Dirksen, 2006). In adult avian skeletal muscle, Ca2+ release via the ryanodine receptors is activated by voltage depolarization across the sarcolemma. This results in a conformational change in the α1s subunit of the calcium voltage-gated calcium channel. The ryanodine receptor RYR1, which interacts with the α1s subunit, responds by undergoing a conformational change causing the pore to open, thereby enabling calcium release from the SR. Increased cytosolic [Ca2+] activates RYR3 via a Ca2+ -induced Ca2+-release mechanism thereby amplifying Ca2+ release from the SR. The structure of the Ca2+-release complex includes associated proteins that modulate Ca2+-release activity. These include the Ca2+ storage protein calsequestrin (CASQ), the structural proteins junctophilin-2 (JPH2) and triadin (TRDN), and the Ca2+ pump protein (ATP2A1 and ATP2A2) and its associated inhibitory protein sarcolipin (SLN) (Rossi and Dirksen, 2006).

Interestingly, most of these genes associated with regulation of Ca2+ homeostasis were significantly affected by temperature treatment, particularly cold treatment. The RYR1 isoform was downregulated >2-fold in cold treated cells from both lines, but modestly increased in the heat-treated cells. (Table S3). The α1s subunit of the calcium voltage-gated calcium channel (CACNA1S) was significantly downregulated in both lines (Log2FC = −3.64 and −3.91 for RBC2 and F line, respectively), but was modestly upregulated by ~0.4-fold in heat-treated cells from both lines. Other Ca2+ regulatory, pump, and storage genes associated with the SR including, TRDN, ATP2A2, SLN, CASQ2 were also significantly downregulated. Log2FC ranged from −0.71 for ATP2A2 in the cold treated cells from RBC2 to −7.2 for TRDN from the same treatment (Table S3). Taken in total, the small increase in TRPC1 expression in cold treated cells may be offset by decreased of expression of these other genes. This has important implications for the ability of these cells to maintain normal Ca2+ homeostasis in response to cold temperatures. Heat stress can effect an increase in intracellular [Ca2+] (Mikkelsen et al., 1991) and there is some evidence that elevated temperatures result in decreased ability of the SR to sequester Ca2+ in muscle (van der Poel and Stephenson, 2007). The intracellular Ca2+ concentration regulates a plethora of metabolic and transcriptional activities, so exposure to hot or cold temperatures early in development may have long-term implications for the fate of the developing muscle.

Among the most significantly altered gene pathways in the turkey satellite cells based on activation score were those corresponding to the eIF2, eIF4, and p70S6K, and mTOR signaling. The eIF2 imitation complex integrates a diverse array of stress-related signals to regulate mRNA translation, especially in response to stress. Likewise, eIF4 and p70S6K signaling play critical roles in translation regulation (Sonenberg and Hinnebusch, 2009). Genes of the mTOR signaling pathway play a critical role in the regulation of skeletal muscle hypertrophy (Bodine et al., 2001; Ohanna et al., 2005; Rommel et al., 2013) this pathway is one of the main signaling pathways controlling protein synthesis and cell proliferation in myogenic satellite cells (Han et al., 2008). Muscle growth after hatch occurs through hypertrophic growth of existing muscle fibers. Thus, the accretion of breast muscle mass would involve mTOR signaling. Down regulation of genes in these pathways by cold treatment would significantly affect downstream gene action through altered translation.

The mTOR protein is central to two multi-protein complexes with distinct cellular functions that integrate cellular signals to regulate metabolism, proliferation and autophagy (Laplante and Sabatini, 2009). mTORC1 positively regulates cell growth, protein synthesis, and the activity of sterol regulatory element binding protein 1 (SREBP1) and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARG) which are key genes involved in lipid homeostasis. Less is known about the mTORC2 complex although it too plays key roles in cell survival, metabolism, proliferation and cytoskeleton organization (Laplante and Sabatini, 2009). The expanded mTOR pathway also overlaps with aspects of eIF4 translational regulation. Thus cellular stress can produce a temporal reduction in protein synthesis. In the present study a greater number of mTOR pathway genes were significantly affected by cold treatment, primarily through down regulation.

Temperature can also stimulate the transdifferentiation of satellite cells to an adipogenic phenotype. Harding et al. (2015) demonstrated that elevated temperatures in vitro increased lipid accumulation in both broiler p. major and b. femoris satellite cells, and decreased temperatures reduced lipid accumulation in both cell types. Clark et al. (2016b) showed that elevated temperatures in the F and RBC2 turkey p. major satellite cells impacted the expression of adipogenic genes and increased lipid deposition. In the current study, expression of key adipogenic genes CEBPB [CCAAT/enhancer binding protein (C/EBP), beta] and PPARG in the differentiating turkey cells was not affected by thermal treatment. However, SCD [stearoyl-CoA desaturase (delta-9-desaturase), an enzyme responsible for complex lipid production] was significantly up regulated in cold-treated cells (Log2FC = 1.403 and 1.338 in the RBC2 and F line, respectively), but also slightly up regulated in the RBC2 cells at 43°C (Log2FC = 1.13).

Further support for the conversion of breast muscle satellite cells to an adipogenic cell fate, was the change in expression of NPY in the 33–38°C comparison. NPY is a neuropeptide that is widely expressed in the central nervous system (Wang et al., 2007). The peptide is thought to function through G protein-coupled receptors to activate mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), regulate intracellular calcium levels, and activate potassium channels (RefSeq, Oct 2014). Recently, Zhang et al. (2015) found that NPY plays a role in promoting adipogenesis in chickens. Although, there was no effect on proliferation, supplementation of stromal-vascular fraction cells with NPY during differentiation was associated with greater glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase activity, increased expression of fatty acid binding protein 4 and lipoprotein lipase, indicative of increased lipid accumulation. Additional research on the role of NPY in satellite cells and more broadly in muscle is clearly warranted.

The post-hatch time-frame is critical and exposure of poultry to extreme temperatures, can seriously compromise the quality of meat. This study demonstrates significant alterations in gene expression and supports the hypothesis that satellite cell differentiation is directly altered in turkeys in response to ambient temperature. Numerous expression differences were observed between cells incubated at both lower (33°C) and higher (43°C) temperatures as compared to control (38°C). Greater expression differences were seen in the cold treatments where a greater number of the DE genes were down regulated. Fewer expression differences in the differentiating cells were observed between the genetic lines than observed for proliferating cells in the same experimental system (Reed et al., 2017). This suggests that the impact of temperature on satellite cells attributed to selection for fast growth may occur primarily at early points in satellite cell activation. Studies are currently underway to examine the effects of thermal challenge on in vivo gene expression and early muscle development of poults.

Statements

Author contributions

KR, SV, and GS conceived and designed the experiments. SV and KM performed the experiments. KR and KM analyzed the data. KR, KM, SV, and GS drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

The authors gratefully acknowledge support from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Institute of Food Agriculture, AFRI competitive grant no. 2014-67003-21812.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Cindy Coy for technical assistance in culturing the satellite cells used in this study. Juan Abrahante, University of Minnesota Informatics Institute, assisted with data processing.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2017.00948/full#supplementary-material

Figure S1

Hierarchical clustering of samples based on Euclidean distance reiterated relationships shown by PCA. Global gene expression differences among groups are illustrated in the heat map constructed from the co-expressed genes with the greatest experiment-wise differences in average normalized expression.

Figure S2

GO classification of genes expressed in cultured turkey p. major satellite cells after 48 h differentiation at 38°C.

Figure S3

Volcano plot showing the relationship between the ANOVA p-values and experiment-wise Log2 fold change for gene expression in p. major satellite cell transcriptomes during differentiation.

Figure S4

Distribution of differentially expressed genes for cold (33 vs. 38°C) and hot (43 vs. 38°C) comparisons of each line (RBC2 and F) during p. major satellite cell differentiation. For each temperature comparison, the number of genes with FDR p < 0.05 and |Log2FC| > 2.0 that were shared or unique to each group are indicated. Numbers in parentheses are the number of DE genes in the group that were also identified as DE in proliferating satellite cells (Reed et al., 2017).

Figure S5

Example gene networks identified from differentially expressed genes using QIAGEN's Ingenuity® Pathway Analysis (IPA®, QIAGEN Bioinformatics) software showing differential response of p. major satellite cell transcriptome to temperature. Depicted are the two most significant scoring gene networks identified in IPA analysis of the 70 DE genes shared among the treatment comparisons. In each panel the direction (red = up regulated, green = down regulated) and magnitude (color intensity) of expression changes are indicated. Shapes within the networks correspond to genes, gene products, or small molecules.

Figure S6

Predicted upstream effects for three DE genes (AHR, TGFB1, and TGFB3) shared among treatments that showed directional by-temperature differences in expression in IPA analysis (Ingenuity Pathway Analysis, Qiagen Bioinformatics).

References

  • 1

    Ain BazizH.GeraertP. A.PadilhaJ. C.GuillauminS. (1996). Chronic heat exposure enhances fat deposition and modifies muscle and fat partition in broiler carcasses. Poult. Sci.75, 505513. 10.3382/ps.0750505

  • 2

    AndersonC. M.HuJ.BarnesR. M.HeidtA. B.CornelissenI.BlackB. L. (2015). Myocyte enhancer factor 2C function in skeletal muscle is required for normal growth and glucose metabolism in mice. Skelet. Muscle5:7. 10.1186/s13395-015-0031-0

  • 3

    AndrewsS. (2010). FastQC: A Quality Control Tool for High Throughput Sequence Data. Available online at: http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/

  • 4

    ArmandO.BoutineauA. M.MaugerA.PautouM. P.KienyM. (1983). Origin of satellite cells in avian skeletal muscles. Arch. Anat. Microsc. Morphol. Exp.72, 163181.

  • 5

    AsakuraA.KomakiM.RudnickiM. (2001). Muscle satellite cells are multipotential stem cells that exhibit myogenic, osteogenic, and adipogenic differentiation. Differentiation68, 245253. 10.1046/j.1432-0436.2001.680412.x

  • 6

    BodineS. C.StittT. N.GonzalezM.KlineW. O.StoverG. L.BauerleinR.et al. (2001). Akt/mTOR pathway is a crucial regulator of skeletal muscle hypertrophy and can prevent muscle atrophy in vivo. Nat. Cell Biol.3, 10141019. 10.1038/ncb1101-1014

  • 7

    BolgerA. M.LohseM.UsadelB. (2014). Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics30, 21142120. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170

  • 8

    ClarkD. L.CoyC. S.StrasburgG. M.ReedK. M.VellemanS. G. (2016a). Temperature effect on proliferation and differentiation of satellite cells from turkeys with different growth rates. Poult. Sci.95, 934947. 10.3382/ps/pev437

  • 9

    ClarkD. L.StrasburgG. M.ReedK. M.VellemanS. G. (2016b). Influence of temperature and growth selection on turkey pectoralis major muscle satellite cell adipogenic gene expression and lipid accumulation. Poult. Sci.96, 10151027. 10.3382/ps/pew374

  • 10

    ConboyI. M.RandoT. A. (2002). The regulation of Notch signaling controls satellite cell activation and cell fate determination in postnatal myogenesis. Dev. Cell3, 397409. 10.1016/S1534-5807(02)00254-X

  • 11

    FujimakiS.MachidaM.HidakaR.AsashimaM.TakemasaT.KuwabaraT. (2013). Intrinsic ability of adult stem cell in skeletal muscle: an effective and replenishable resource to the establishment of pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cells Int.2013:420164. 10.1155/2013/420164

  • 12

    GuX. C.ZhangX. B.HuB.ZiY.LiM. (2016). Neuropeptide Y accelerates post-fracture bone healing by promoting osteogenesis of mesenchymal stem cells. Neuropeptides60, 6166. 10.1016/j.npep.2016.09.005

  • 13

    HalevyO.GeyraA.BarakM.UniZ.SklanD. (2000). Early posthatch starvation decreases satellite cell proliferation and skeletal muscle growth in chicks. J. Nutr.130, 858864.

  • 14

    HalevyO.KrispinA.LeshemY.McMurtryJ. P.YahavS. (2001). Early-age heat exposure affect skeletal muscle satellite cell proliferation and differentiation in chicks. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Intergr. Comp. Physiol.281, R302R309.

  • 15

    HalevyO.PiestunY.AllouhM. Z.RosserB. W.RinkevichY.ReshefR.et al. (2004). Pattern of Pax7 expression during myogenesis in the posthatch chicken establishes a model for satellite cell differentiation and renewal. Dev. Dyn.231, 489502. 10.1002/dvdy.20151

  • 16

    HanB.TongJ.ZhuM. J.MaC.DuM. (2008). Insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and leucine activate pig myogenic satellite cells through mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway. Mol. Reprod. Dev.75, 810817. 10.1002/mrd.20832

  • 17

    HardingR. L.ClarkD. L.HalevyO.CoyC. S.YahavS.VellemanS. G. (2015). The effect of temperature on apoptosis and adipogenesis on skeletal muscle satellite cells derived from different muscle types. Physiol. Rep.3:e12539. 10.14814/phy2.12539

  • 18

    HauksdottirH.FarboudB.PrivalskyM. L. (2003). Retinoic acid receptors beta and gamma do not repress, but instead activate target gene transcription in both the absence and presence of hormone ligand. Mol. Endocrinol.17, 373385. 10.1210/me.2002-0340

  • 19

    HavensteinG. B.FerketP. R.GrimesJ. L.QureshiM. A.NestorK. E. (2007). Comparison of the performance of 1966- versus 2003-type turkeys when fed representative 1966 and 2003 turkey diets: growth rate, livability, and feed conversion. Poult. Sci.86, 232240. 10.1093/ps/86.2.232

  • 20

    KiveläR.SalmelaI.NguyenY. H.PetrovaT. V.KoistinenH. A.WienerZ.et al. (2016). The transcription factor Prox1 is essential for satellite cell differentiation and muscle fibre-type regulation. Nat. Commun.7:13124. 10.1038/ncomms13124

  • 21

    KurnothT.SalomonF. V.GilleU. (1994). Quantitative changes in the capillary supply of selected muscles of turkeys, ducks, rats and swine during postnatal development. Anat. Histol. Embryol.23, 2139. 10.1111/j.1439-0264.1994.tb00238.x

  • 22

    LaplanteM.SabatiniD. M. (2009). mTOR signaling at a glance. J. Cell Sci.122, 35893594. 10.1242/jcs.051011

  • 23

    LiuY.SchneiderM. F. (2014). FGF2 activates TRPC and Ca(2+) signaling leading to satellite cell activation. Front. Physiol.5:38. 10.3389/fphys.2014.00038

  • 24

    LoveM. I.HuberW.AndersS. (2014). Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol.15:550. 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8

  • 25

    LoyauT.Metayer-CoustardS.BerriC.CrochetS.Cailleau-AudouinE.SannierM.et al. (2014). Thermal manipulation during embryogenesis has long-term effects on muscle and liver metabolism in fast-growing chickens. PLoS ONE9:e105339. 10.1371/journal.pone.0105339

  • 26

    LuQ.WenJ.ZhangH. (2007). Effect of chronic heat exposure on fat deposition and meat quality in two genetic types of chicken. Poult. Sci.86, 10591064. 10.1093/ps/86.6.1059

  • 27

    MauroA. (1961). Satellite cell of skeletal muscle fibers. J. Phiophys. Biochem. Cytol.9, 463496. 10.1083/jcb.9.2.493

  • 28

    MiH.MuruganujanA.ThomasP. D. (2013). PANTHER in 2013: modeling the evolution of gene function, and other gene attributes, in the context of phylogenetic trees. Nucleic Acids Res.41(Database issue), D377D386. 10.1093/nar/gks1118

  • 29

    MichosO.PanmanL.VinterstenK.BeierK.ZellerR.ZunigaA. (2004). Gremlin-mediated BMP antagonism induces the epithelial-mesenchymal feedback signaling controlling metanephric kidney and limb organogenesis. Development131, 34013410. 10.1242/dev.01251

  • 30

    MikkelsenR. B.ReinlibL.DonowitzM.ZahniserD. (1991). Hyperthermia effects on cytosolic [Ca2+]: analysis at the single cell level by digitized imaging microscopy and cell survival. Cancer Res.51, 359364.

  • 31

    ModreyP.NichelmannM. (1992). Development of autonomic and behavioral thermoregulation in turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo). J. Therm. Biol.17, 287292. 10.1016/0306-4565(92)90035-E

  • 32

    MolketinJ. D.BlackB. L.MartinJ. F.OlsonE. N. (1995). Cooperative activation of muscle gene expression by MEF2 and myogenic bHLH proteins. Cell83, 11251136. 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90139-6

  • 33

    MossF. P.LeblondC. P. (1971). Satellite cells as the source of nuclei in muscles of growing rats. Anat. Rec.170, 421435. 10.1002/ar.1091700405

  • 34

    MozdziakP. E.WalshT. J.McCoyD. W. (2002). The effect of early posthatch nutrition on satellite cell mitotic activity. Poult. Sci.81, 17031708. 10.1093/ps/81.11.1703

  • 35

    MyhreK. (1978). Behavioral temperature regulation in neonate chick of Bantam hen (Gallus domesticus). Poult. Sci.57, 13691375. 10.3382/ps.0571369

  • 36

    NestorK. E. (1977). Genetics of growth and reproduction in the turkey. 5. Selection for increased body weight alone and in combination with increased egg production. Poult. Sci.56, 337347. 10.3382/ps.0560337

  • 37

    NestorK. E. (1984). Genetics of growth and reproduction in the turkey. 9. Long-term selection for increased 16-week body weight. Poult. Sci.63, 21142122. 10.3382/ps.0632114

  • 38

    OhannaM.SoberingA. K.LapointeT.LorenzoL.PraudC.PetroulakisE.et al. (2005). Atrophy of S6K1(−/−) skeletal muscle cells reveals distinct mTOR effectors for cell cycle and size control. Nat. Cell Biol.7, 286294. 10.1038/ncb1231

  • 39

    OntellM.KozekaK. (1984). The organogenesis of murine striated muscle: a cytoarchitectural study. Am. J. Anat.171, 133148. 10.1002/aja.1001710202

  • 40

    PiestunY.DruyanS.BrakeJ.YahavS. (2013). Thermal manipulations during broiler incubation alter performance of broilers to 70 days of age. Poult. Sci.92, 11551163. 10.3382/ps.2012-02609

  • 41

    PowellD. J.VellemanS. G.CowiesonA. J.SinghM.MuirW. I. (2016). Influence of hatch time and access to feed on intramuscular adipose tissue deposition in broilers. Poult. Sci.95, 14491456. 10.3382/ps/pew063

  • 42

    ReedK. M.MendozaK. M.AbrahanteJ. E.BarnesN. E.VellemanS. G.StarburgG. M. (2017). Response of turkey muscle satellite cells to thermal challenge. I. Transcriptome effects in proliferating cells. BMC Genomics18:352. 10.1186/s12864-017-3740-4

  • 43

    RichterE. A.HargreavesM. (2013). Exercise, GLUT4, and skeletal muscle glucose uptake. Physiol. Rev.93, 9931017. 10.1152/physrev.00038.2012

  • 44

    RommelC.BodineS. C.ClarkeB. A.RossmanR.NunezL.StittT. N.et al. (2013). Mediation of IGF-1-induced skeletal myotube hypertrophy by PI(3)K/Akt/mTOR and PI(3)K/Akt/GSK3 pathways. Nat. Cell Biol.3, 10091013. 10.1038/ncb1101-1009

  • 45

    RossiA. E.DirksenR. T. (2006). Sarcoplasmic reticulum: the dynamic governor of muscle. Muscle Nerve33, 715731. 10.1002/mus.20512

  • 46

    SherwoodR. I.ChristensenJ. L.ConboyI. M.ConboyM. J.RandoT. A.WeissmanI. L.et al. (2004). Isolation of adult mouse myogenic progenitors: functional heterogeneity of cells within and engrafting skeletal muscle. Cell119, 543554. 10.1016/j.cell.2004.10.021

  • 47

    ShinderD.RusalM.TannyJ.DruyanS.YahavS. (2007). Thermoregulatory response of chicks (Gallus domesticus) to low ambient temperatures at an early age. Poult. Sci.86, 22002209.

  • 48

    SillerW. G.WightP. A. L. (1979). The pathology of deep pectoral myopathy of turkeys. Avian Pathol.7, 583617. 10.1080/03079457808418313

  • 49

    SonenbergN.HinnebuschA. G. (2009). Regulation of translation initiation in eukaryotes: mechanisms and biological targets. Cell136, 731745. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.042

  • 50

    SosnickiA. A.CassensR. G.ViminiR. J.GreaserM. L. (1991a). Distribution of capillaries in normal and ischemic turkey skeletal muscle. Poult. Sci.70, 343348. 10.3382/ps.0700343

  • 51

    SosnickiA. A.CassensR. G.ViminiR. J.GreaserM. L. (1991b). Histopathological and ultrastructural alterations of turkey skeletal muscle. Poult. Sci.70, 349357. 10.3382/ps.0700349

  • 52

    SvenssonA.LibeliusR.TågerudS. (2008). Semaphorin 6C expression in innervated and denervated skeletal muscle. J. Mol. Histol.39, 513. 10.1007/s10735-007-9113-6

  • 53

    TakizawaM.NomuraT.WakisakaE.YoshizukaN.AokiJ.AraiH.et al. (1999). cDNA cloning and expression of human lactosylceramide synthase. Biochim. Biophys. Acta1438, 301304. 10.1016/S1388-1981(99)00051-7

  • 54

    van der PoelC.StephensonD. G. (2007). Effects of elevated physiological temperatures on sarcoplasmic reticulum function in mechanically skinned muscle fibers of the rat. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.293, C133C147. 10.1152/ajpcell.00052.2007

  • 55

    VellemanS. G.LiuX.NestorK. E.McFarlandD. C. (2000). Heterogeneity in growth and differentiation characteristics in male and female satellite cells isolated from turkey lines with different growth rates. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part A Mol. Integr. Physiol.125, 503509. 10.1016/S1095-6433(00)00178-1

  • 56

    WangC.YangN.WuS.LiuL.SunX.NieS. (2007). Difference of NPY and its receptor gene expressions between obesity and obesity-resistant rats in response to high-fat diet. Horm. Metab. Res.39, 262267. 10.1055/s-2007-973073

  • 57

    WilsonB. W.NiebergP. S.BuhrR. J. (1990). Turkey muscle growth and focal myopathy. Poult. Sci.69, 15531562. 10.3382/ps.0691553

  • 58

    YahavS.McMurtryJ. P. (2001). Thermotolerance acquisition in broiler chickens by temperature conditioning early in life – the effect of timing and ambient temperature. Poult. Sci.80, 16621666. 10.1093/ps/80.12.1662

  • 59

    YahavS.PlavnikI. (1999). Effect of early-age thermal conditioning and food restriction on performance and thermotolerance of male broiler chickens. Br. Poult. Sci.40, 120126. 10.1080/00071669987944

  • 60

    ZammitP. S. (2008). All muscle satellite cells are equal, but are some more equal than others?J. Cell Sci.121, 29752982. 10.1242/jcs.019661

  • 61

    ZammitP. S.PartridgeT. A.Yablonka-ReuveniZ. (2006). The skeletal muscle satellite cell: the stem cell that came in from the cold. J. Histochem. Cytochem.54, 11771191. 10.1369/jhc.6R6995.2006

  • 62

    ZhangW.BaiS.LiuD.ClineM. A.GilbertE. R. (2015). Neuropeptide Y promotes adipogenesis in chicken adipose cells in vitro. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part A Mol. Integr. Physiol.181, 6270. 10.1016/j.cbpa.2014.11.012

  • 63

    ZhangZ. Y.JiaG. Q.ZuoJ. J.ZhangY.LeiJ.RenL.et al. (2012). Effects of constant and cyclic heat stress on muscle metabolism and meat quality of broiler breast fillet and thigh meat. Poult. Sci.91, 2931293710.3382/ps.2012-02255

Summary

Keywords

satellite cell, skeletal muscle, growth-selected, turkey, differentiation

Citation

Reed KM, Mendoza KM, Strasburg GM and Velleman SG (2017) Response of Turkey Muscle Satellite Cells to Thermal Challenge. II. Transcriptome Effects in Differentiating Cells. Front. Physiol. 8:948. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00948

Received

07 September 2017

Accepted

08 November 2017

Published

30 November 2017

Volume

8 - 2017

Edited by

Yajun Wang, Sichuan University, China

Reviewed by

Qinghua Nie, South China Agricultural University, China; Paweł Tomasz Maćkowiak, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Poland

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Kent M. Reed

This article was submitted to Avian Physiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Physiology

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics