Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

EDITORIAL article

Front. Water, 24 November 2025

Sec. Water and Human Systems

Volume 7 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2025.1738668

This article is part of the Research TopicAdvances in Socio-hydrology for Building Resilience to a Changing ClimateView all 8 articles

Editorial: Advances in socio-hydrology for building resilience to a changing climate

  • 1Council on Energy, Environment and Water (CEEW), New Delhi, India
  • 2Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nagoya Daigaku, Nagoya, Japan
  • 3School of Environment and Science, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

Socio-hydrology, an emerging field of study, looks at the interaction of humans and water systems across different scales, and the contribution of these interactions to advancing water security. These interactions are bidirectional with anthropogenic activities impacting hydrological regimes, and the modified hydrological regimes, in turn, posing challenges to society for achieving water security. Further, emerging climatic changes and persistent social inequalities have made the dynamics of human-water interactions more complex creating new vulnerabilities and uncertainties.

This Research Topic, having seven research articles, presents applied research focusing on innovative approaches to assess complex dynamics of human-water interactions, and case studies reflecting the stakeholders' engagement and participatory approaches in building climate-resilient water and social systems.

The vision for addressing the societal impacts of climate change through water is presented in the article by Zimmermann et al.. It highlights that climate-induced water insecurity affects livelihoods, gender roles, and cultural norms unequally, shaping human experiences and potentially intensifying social and political tensions. In response, three key pathways are proposed to build resilience into future water systems. These include innovative technologies that enable proactive adaptation to changing water resources; working alongside nature, embracing blue-green infrastructure, and collaborating with natural water entities for resilience; and strong community participation, empowered by awareness, education, and resources to realize the first two pathways.

On the technology front, Šaponjić et al. building on a case study from Maharashtra, India highlights that behavioral change can play an instrumental role in promotion of water saving and climate smart technologies. It identifies that non-adoption is not only due to a lack of awareness or financial resources but rather complex psychological and social barriers. These include a lack of trust in support programs, unfair treatment that discourages making a financial commitment, and doubt in one's ability to maintain the systems. The article concludes that effective promotion of micro-irrigation requires a socio-psychological approach that includes understanding the farmers' fears, beliefs, and emotions for designing effective and farmer-centric technologies.

Collaboration with nature for building adaptation and resilience is amply demonstrated by Itsumi et al. in Okazaki City, Japan. The research used a qualitative approach to conclude that urban river restoration holds potential value for community-engaged climate change adaptation by revitalizing the connection between urban society and rivers. The research recommends that for successful integration, river restoration must be supported by flexible community participation policies that evolve in response to the participants' shifting levels of perception, moving from merely gathering people to encouraging multi-stakeholder communication, and eventually ensuring independence from government restrictions.

Additionally, if the approach to work alongside nature and integrated blue-green infrastructure is not mainstreamed it can have serious adverse impacts. This was made evident by Qi et al. that presented the real-world implications of climate change driven extreme flood intensification in Pearl River Basin, China which is a major economic region in the country. The research projects a staggering 44–50 per cent increase in extreme floods by mid-century and up to a 68 per cent increase by the century's end, indicating a significant increase in extreme floods. The implications of intensification of floods are on homes, infrastructure, and livelihoods of millions, disrupting supply chains and impacting decades of development. The article suggests a two-pronged strategy of climate change mitigation and enhancing flood management. That is, curbing the root cause of the problem by transitioning away from carbon-intensive practices and enhancing flood management infrastructure.

The importance of social capital in resource management for livelihoods and ecosystem services is demonstrated by Rengalakshmi et al. using the case on the decline of the tank irrigation systems in Tamil Nadu, India. Such systems that were central to community-based collective surface water irrigation have undergone severe degradation because of a shift in farmers priority to groundwater-based individual irrigation driven by energy subsidies. The findings serve as a critical call to action, suggesting that decline in tank irrigation systems is not just a hydrological problem but a socio-hydrological one.

Similarly, one other article by Komori el al. provides evidence of the importance of society's ability for adapting to flood risk in Wakayama City, Japan. Using the socio-hydrological system dynamics model, the research demonstrates that social vulnerability can be explained by residents' flood memory, capturing both adaptation and levee effects. The adaptation effect reduces social vulnerability because of the community's awareness of flooding situations in the past in both urban and rural areas agnostic of whether public drainage systems exist or not. In contrast, the levee effect that increases social vulnerability was found only in rural areas that have not experienced flooding and thus communities lack the awareness on the reasons accentuating the flood risk.

Lastly, strong governance is non-negotiable for achieving the pathways which are highlighted in the article by Prakash et al.. It asserts that traditional water management is insufficient because it fails to account for how social dynamics, political structures, and cultural norms intersect with hydrological processes. Hence, the research advocates for adaptive governance, a flexible and inclusive approach that utilizes various socio-hydrological models. The key recommendations include strengthening regional cooperation among South Asian countries on transboundary water issues, focusing on knowledge sharing and technology transfer; launching pilot projects to identify best practices and allow for trial-and-error learning; and fostering interdisciplinary collaboration to ensure equitable and resilient water management for future generations.

The innovative approaches and evidence based findings and recommendations in this Research Topic on “Advances in Socio-hydrology for Building Resilience to a Changing Climate” serves as a reminder to various stakeholders that reforms are needed at all levels—regional, national, and sub-national. In this transition, community action and local governance are paramount for the development of sustainable and climate resilient water systems and services. Each such intervention goes beyond engineered fixes and highlights the areas of future research at the science-policy-practice interface.

Author contributions

NB: Writing – original draft, Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing, Project administration. SK: Conceptualization, Project administration, Writing – original draft. SN: Writing – original draft, Conceptualization. BM: Writing – review & editing.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Keywords: blue-green infrastructure, community participation, innovative technology, social capital, climate adaptation, science-policy interface

Citation: Bassi N, Katyaini S, Nakamura S and McIntosh BS (2025) Editorial: Advances in socio-hydrology for building resilience to a changing climate. Front. Water 7:1738668. doi: 10.3389/frwa.2025.1738668

Received: 03 November 2025; Accepted: 10 November 2025;
Published: 24 November 2025.

Edited and reviewed by: Saket Pande, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands

Copyright © 2025 Bassi, Katyaini, Nakamura and McIntosh. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Nitin Bassi, bml0aW4uYmFzc2lAY2Vldy5pbg==

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.