Introduction
ALS is a late-onset neurodegenerative disease of unknown etiology. Since it was first described (Charcot, ), several mechanisms, such as oxidative stress, glutamate excitotoxicity, glial cell pathology, or aberrant RNA metabolism (for review, see Vucic and Kiernan, 2009). Recently the evidence accumulates that mitochondrial damage and defective axonal transport may play a pivotal role (Shi et al., 2010; Cozzolino and Carri, 2012). Nowadays, a multifactorial origin is widely accepted for the neurodegeneration in ALS, but the triggering mechanism(s) underlying its initiation remain to be defined.
One of the issues, which are still unresolved, is the triggering site. ALS is classically thought to be a disease that causes the progressive loss of upper and lower motoneurones (MNs) followed by axonal degeneration and muscle atrophy, resulting in the virtually complete disappearance of spinal and cortical MNs (Charcot, ; Strong and Rosenfeld, 2003). This point of view is still prevalent among clinical neurologists, and ongoing debates focus mostly on the question of which MN subsystem (upper or lower) is affected first (Chou and Norris, ; Eisen et al., ; Eisen, ; Van Der Graaff et al., 2009).
For obvious reasons, it is not possible to directly characterize the properties of MNs in ALS patients. Therefore, a significant proportion of the research on ALS takes place in animal models of the disease that carry mutations in the Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase gene (the SOD1 mice and rats). Although these mutations are responsible only for about 2.5% of all the ALS cases, the pathology in SOD1 animals largely resembles clinical features of human sporadic ALS.
In recent years, research in SOD1 animal ALS models has found MN pathology to begin at the distal axon terminals and to proceed in a “dying back” pattern (Fischer et al., ; Xie et al., 2005; Parkhouse et al., ; Shi et al., 2009; Carrasco et al., ). Below, we will present a piece of experimental evidence that, in our opinion, may be interpreted in favor of this last view.
The single motor unit case
The detailed information on the methods applied and the patients investigated is given in the study published earlier (Piotrkiewicz et al., ). Briefly, in the study participated 20 patients, aged 31–75 (mean 55.0 years) and diagnosed as having definite ALS according to El Escorial criteria (Brooks, 1994). Motor unit potentials (MUPs) were picked up from the brachial biceps by intramuscular disposable wire electrodes, amplified and transferred for off-line analysis to a PC computer by an A/D converter with sampling rates 10–20 kHz.
Among 124 single motor units (MUs) analyzed in this study we found one (E-MU), which strikingly differed from all others. It was recorded from the brachial biceps of 49 years old patient with 50% force deficit (as compared with average maximum force of control subjects). The firing pattern of the E-MU was very irregular, which could not be ascribed to the fluctuating synaptic inflow, since the other MU (N-MU) recorded simultaneously discharged very regularly (Figure 1A).
Figure 1
E-MU exhibited also an exceptional variability of potential shape due to the high jitter and changes in the number of individual components (Figure 1B). It was often difficult to decide, whether the given component was an integral part of MU potential that was sometimes blocked, a satellite, a doublet of the motoneuronal origin, or ectopic discharge. Because of these ambiguities E-MU was excluded from the analysis of doublet firing. Figure 1C presents the interspike interval histogram of E-MU, compared with that of N-MU. The initial peak of this histogram (0–20 ms), which includes the short intervals between potential pairs recognized as doublets, is presented with expanded time scale and shorter bin width in the insert to Figure 1C. The following maximum (at 85 ms) corresponds to the regular discharges and the next one (at 120 ms) is due to the prolonged post-doublet intervals, typical feature of double discharges. The histogram reveals also several intervals, so-called “outsiders,” which duration is longer than officially accepted upper limit of doublet intervals (20 ms, according to AAEM, ), but shorter than the lower limit of the regular interval histogram. In our previous study (Piotrkiewicz et al., ) such pairs of potentials were classified also as doublets, since their intervals were visibly shorter and always followed by post-doublet interval significantly longer as compared with the regular discharge. The E-MU discharge was characterized by exceptionally high percentage of “outsiders,” as compared with other doubling MUs from ALS patients.
Possible explanation
De Carvalho () described two distinct types of fasciculation potentials recorded from ALS patients. Fasciculation potentials of the first type, which were usually recorded from strong muscles, were stable, simple and the same potentials could be recruited both voluntarily and by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Fasciculation potentials of the second type were complex, unstable, tended to have lower discharge rates and were generated only spontaneously. It was suggested that the fasciculations of the first type arise at the spinal (or upper) MN level and those of the second type, in distal axonal sprouts. This suggestion was further confirmed by a recent study of Kleine et al. ().
In SOD1 mice (animal model of ALS). Schaefer et al. () found two populations of MUs: one (1) with well-preserved axonal branches, sometimes enlarged as the result of reinnervation, and the other (2) with degenerating axon terminals, sometimes with no neuromuscular contacts at all. The latter finding is in line with growing number of studies in SOD1 mice suggesting that the disease may start in neuromuscular junction and proceed with the “dying-back” pattern through an axon to the MN (e.g., Fischer et al., ).
If also in the human sporadic ALS the disease began in motor endplates, then one might expect the presence of two populations of MUs: one which is still intact and the other being under process of losing their neuromuscular contacts and thus on the way to degeneration. The first one would correspond to the population (1) in Schaefer's study and would produce fasciculations of de Carvalho's first type as well as doublets, both generated by hyperexcitable MNs. The second one would correspond to the Schaefer's population (2); the affected, hyperexcitable axonal collaterals (Bostock et al., ) could generate ectopic activity (fasciculations of de Carvalho's second type). Our MU with unstable potential shape, irregular low-rate discharge, big percentage of “outsiders,” but still under voluntary control, might represent the intermediate type: a MU, which is loosing contacts with its muscle fibers. It is conceivable that the time from the first noticeable symptoms to the complete loss of MN control upon its muscle unit may be short and thus the majority of MUs, which can be voluntarily driven, would belong to the yet unaffected population. This may be the reason why among 124 analyzed ALS MUs we found only one with the characteristics described above.
Concluding remarks
Could it be possible that human ALS also begins in motor endplates and proceeds via axons in a “dying-back” pattern?
In fact, abnormalities in motor axon properties are often reported in ALS patients (Bostock et al., ; Mogyoros et al., ; Stephanova et al., 2001; Priori et al., ; Koszewicz et al., ; Kanai et al., ; Vucic and Kiernan, 2006). The pathology of motor axons has been shown to be more pronounced distally (Nakata et al., ; Noto et al., ). Certain lines of evidence derived from clinical neurophysiology of ALS (Eisen and Swash, ) could be also interpreted as favoring the “dying back” hypothesis of MN degeneration. For example, the marked fatigue observed early in the disease could indicate an endplate dysfunction. The routine test to diagnose the impairment of neuromuscular transmission in Myasthenia gravis, typical motor endplate disease, is the investigation of change in MU potential amplitude due to repetitive nerve stimulation. The amplitude decrements in such a test indicate the impairment of neuromuscular transmission. Decremental responses to stimulation were observed also in ALS (Bernstein and Antel, ; Killian et al., ; Wang et al., 2001). Iwanami and colleagues () found even the incidence of positive decrements higher in the ALS than in the Myasthenia gravis patients.
The ongoing debates between clinical neurologists focus essentially on the question of which MN subsystem is affected first. The term “dying back” was used in this debate to characterize the hypothesis that the ALS is primarily a lower MN disease spreading to upper MNs (Van Der Graaff et al., 2009). However, if ALS pathology indeed began in axons, then the lower and upper MNs could degenerate independently of each other. This possibility was recently suggested by several authors (Terao et al., 1999; Attarian et al., ; Agosta et al., ).
Recently, the question of possible heterogeneity of ALS is often raised (Adamek et al., ; Beghi et al., ; Bastos et al., ; Chiò et al., ; Van Den Berg, 2011). It is thus possible that different ALS phenotypes may be initiated at different sites. In any case, the proper defining of disease initiation site would be an important step toward eventual discovery of the factor triggering the disease and the target of its possible treatment.
In this opinion we concentrated on the problem of ALS initiation site, favoring one of several possibilities. We are aware that there could be an alternative explanation of firing patterns observed in our E-MU. If, however, this paper evokes a discussion on the possible initiation site of ALS, this may be a little step toward final unraveling of ALS etiology.
Statements
Acknowledgments
The help of Ms. Jolanta Mierzejewska and Mr. Michał Jakubiec with data analysis is kindly acknowledged. This study was partially funded by the grant No 4T11E015125 from the Polish Committee of Scientific Research.
References
1
AAEM. (2001). Glossary of terms in electrodiagnostic medicine. Muscle Nerve24, 2–50.
2
AdamekD.TomikB.PichorA.KałużaJ.SzczudlikA. (2002). The heterogeneity of neuropathological changes in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. A review of own autopsy material. Folia Neuropathol. 40, 119–124.
3
AgostaF.RoccaM. A.ValsasinaP.SalaS.CaputoD.PeriniM.et al. (2009). A longitudinal diffusion tensor MRI study of the cervical cord and brain in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry80, 53–55. 10.1136/jnnp.2008.154252
4
AttarianS.VedelJ.-P.PougetJ.SchmiedA. (2008). Progression of cortical and spinal dysfunctions over time in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Muscle Nerve37, 364–375. 10.1002/mus.20942
5
BastosA. F.OrsiniM.MachadoD.MelloM. P.NaderS.SilvaJ. G.et al. (2011). Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: one or multiple causes?Neurol. Int. 3:e4. 10.4081/ni.2011.e4
6
BeghiE.MenniniT.BendottiC.BiginiP.LogroscinoG.ChioA.et al. (2007). The heterogeneity of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a possible explanation of treatment failure. Curr. Med. Chem. 14, 3185–3200. 10.2174/092986707782793862
7
BernsteinL. P.AntelJ. P. (1981). Motor neuron disease: decremental responses to repetitive nerve stimulation. Neurology31, 204–207.
8
BostockH.ShariefM. K.ReidG.MurrayN. M. (1995). Axonal ion channel dysfunction in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Brain118, 217–225. 10.1093/brain/118.1.217
9
BrooksB. R. (1994). El Escorial World Federation of Neurology criteria for the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Subcommittee on Motor Neuron Diseases/Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis of the World Federation of Neurology Research Group on Neuromuscular Diseases and the El Escorial “Clinical limits of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis” workshop contributors. J. Neurol. Sci. 124(Suppl.), 96–107.
10
CarrascoD. I.BichlerE. K.SeburnK. L.PinterM. J. (2010). Nerve terminal degeneration is independent of muscle fiber genotype in SOD1G93A mice [Online]. Publ. Libr. Sci. Available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.000980210.1371/journal.pone.0009802
11
CharcotJ. M. (1874). Lecons sur les Maladies du Systeme Nerveux faites a la Salpetriere. Paris: Presse Medicale.
12
ChiòA.CalvoA.MogliaC.MazziniL.MoraG. (2011). Phenotypic heterogeneity of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a population based study. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry82, 740–746. 10.1136/jnnp.2010.235952
13
ChouS. M.NorrisF. H. (1993). Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: lower motor neuron disease spreading to upper motor neurons. Muscle Nerve16, 864–869. 10.1002/mus.880160810
14
CozzolinoM.CarriM. T. (2012). Mitochondrial dysfunction in ALS. Prog. Neurobiol. 97, 54–66. 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2011.06.003
15
De CarvalhoM. (2000). Pathophysiological significance of fasciculations in the early diagnosis of ALS. Amyotroph. Lateral Scler. Other Motor Neuron Disord. 1, 43–46.
16
EisenA. (2009). Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis– evolutionary and other perspectives. Muscle Nerve40, 297–304. 10.1002/mus.21404
17
EisenA.EntezaritaherM.StewartH. (1996). Cortical projections to spinal motoneurons: changes with aging and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurology46, 1396–1404.
18
EisenA.SwashM. (2001). Clinical neurophysiology of ALS. Clin. Neurophysiol. 112, 2190–2201.
19
FischerL. R.CulverD. G.TennantP.DavisA. A.WangM.Castellano-SanchezA.et al. (2004). Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis is a distal axonopathy: evidence in mice and man. Exp. Neurol. 185, 232–240. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2003.10.004
20
IwanamiT.SonooM.HatanakaY.HokkokuK.OishiC.ShimizuT. (2011). Decremental responses to repetitive nerve stimulation (RNS) in motor neuron disease. Clin. Neurophysiol. 122, 2530–2536. 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.05.019
21
KanaiK.KuwabaraS.MisawaS.TamuraN.OgawaraK.NakataM.et al. (2006). Altered axonal excitability properties in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: impaired potassium channel function related to disease stage. Brain129, 953–962. 10.1093/brain/awl024
22
KillianJ. M.WilfongA. A.BurnettL.AppelS. H.BolandD. (1994). Decremental motor responses to repetitive nerve stimulation in ALS. Muscle Nerve17, 747–754. 10.1002/mus.880170708
23
KleineB. U.StegemanD. F.SchelhaasH. J.ZwartsM. J. (2008). Firing pattern of fasciculations in ALS: evidence for axonal and neuronal origin. Neurology70, 353–359. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000300559.14806.2a
24
KoszewiczM.BilinskaM.PodemskiR. (2005). [Electrophysiological estimation of the peripheral nerves conduction parameters and the autonomic nervous system function in the course of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis]. Neurol. Neurochir. Pol. 39, 351–357.
25
MogyorosI.KiernanM. C.BurkeD.BostockH. (1998). Strength-duration properties of sensory and motor axons in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Brain121, 851–859. 10.1093/brain/121.5.851
26
NakataM.KuwabaraS.KanaiK.MisawaS.TamuraN.SawaiS.et al. (2006). Distal excitability changes in motor axons in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Clin. Neurophysiol. 117, 1444–1448. 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.04.005
27
NotoY.KanaiK.MisawaS.ShibuyaK.IsoseS.NasuS.et al. (2011). Distal motor axonal dysfunction in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J. Neurol. Sci. 302, 58–62. 10.1016/j.jns.2010.11.025
28
ParkhouseW. S.CunninghamL.McFeeI.MillerJ. M.WhitneyD.PelechS. L.et al. (2008). Neuromuscular dysfunction in the mutant superoxide dismutase mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotroph. Lateral Scler. Other Motor Neuron Disord. 9, 24–34. 10.1080/17482960701725646
29
PiotrkiewiczM.KudinaL.MierzejewskaJ.Hausmanowa-PetrusewiczI. (2008). Analysis of double discharges in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Muscle Nerve38, 845–854. 10.1002/mus.20997
30
PrioriA.CinnanteC.PesentiA.CarpoM.CappellariA.Nobile-OrazioE.et al. (2002). Distinctive abnormalities of motor axonal strength-duration properties in multifocal motor neuropathy and in motor neurone disease. Brain125, 2481–2490. 10.1093/brain/awf255
31
SchaeferA. M.SanesJ. R.LichtmanJ. W. (2005). A compensatory subpopulation of motor neurons in a mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J. Comp. Neurol. 490, 209–219. 10.1002/cne.20620
32
ShiP.WeiY.ZhangJ.GalJ.ZhuH. (2010). Mitochondrial dysfunction is a converging point of multiple pathological pathways in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J. Alzheimers Dis. 20(Suppl. 2)S311–S324. 10.3233/JAD-2010-100366
33
Sotelo-SilveiraJ. R.LepantoP.ElizondoV.HorjalesS.PalaciosF.Martinez-PalmaL.et al. (2009). Axonal mitochondrial clusters containing mutant SOD1 in transgenic models of ALS. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 11, 1535–1545. 10.1089/ARS.2009.2614
34
StephanovaD. I.DaskalovaM.KristevI. (2001). Excitability changes during the recovery cycle of human myelinated motor and sensory axons in normal case and in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Acta Physiol. Pharmacol. Bulg. 26, 41–44.
35
StrongM.RosenfeldJ. (2003). Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a review of current concepts. Amyotroph. Lateral Scler. Other Motor Neuron Disord. 4, 136–143.
36
TeraoS.LiM.HashizumeY.MitsumaT.SobueG. (1999). No transneuronal degeneration between human cortical motor neurons and spinal motor neurons. J. Neurol. 246, 61–62. 10.1007/s004150050309
37
Van Den BergL. H. (2011). ALS: disease or syndrome?J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry82:711. 10.1136/jnnp.2011.241513
38
Van Der GraaffM. M.De JongJ. M.BaasF.De VisserM. (2009). Upper motor neuron and extra-motor neuron involvement in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a clinical and brain imaging review. Neuromuscul. Disord. 19, 53–58. 10.1016/j.nmd.2008.10.002
39
VucicS.KiernanM. C. (2006). Axonal excitability properties in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Clin. Neurophysiol. 117, 1458–1466. 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.04.016
40
VucicS.KiernanM. C. (2009). Pathophysiology of neurodegeneration in familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Curr. Mol. Med. 9, 255–272. 10.2174/156652409787847173
41
WangF. C.De PasquaV.GérardP.DelwaideP. J. (2001). Prognostic value of decremental responses to repetitive nerve stimulation in ALS patients. Neurology57, 897–899.
42
XieJ.AwadK. S.GuoQ. (2005). RNAi knockdown of Par-4 inhibits neurosynaptic degeneration in ALS-linked mice. J. Neurochem. 92, 59–71. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2004.02834.x
Summary
Keywords
etiology, dying back, triggering site, motor endplates, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Citation
Piotrkiewicz M and Hausmanowa-Petrusewicz I (2013) Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a dying motor unit?. Front. Aging Neurosci. 5:7. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2013.00007
Received
11 January 2013
Accepted
26 February 2013
Published
26 March 2013
Volume
5 - 2013
Edited by
P. Hemachandra Reddy, Oregon Health and Science University, USA
Reviewed by
P. Hemachandra Reddy, Oregon Health and Science University, USA; Peizhong Mao, Oregon Health and Science University, USA
Copyright
© 2013 Piotrkiewicz and Hausmanowa-Petrusewicz.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.
*Correspondence: masia@ibib.waw.pl
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.