SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Aging Neurosci.

Sec. Neurocognitive Aging and Behavior

Volume 17 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2025.1510773

This article is part of the Research TopicLifestyle and Healthy Aging to Prevent Cognitive Decline and DementiaView all 30 articles

Optimal Exercise Interventions for Enhancing Cognitive Function in Older Adults: A Network Meta-Analysis

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, China
  • 2Nanjing Police University, Nanjing, Liaoning Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Cognitive decline poses a significant challenge to healthy aging. While exercise is widely recognized for its cognitive benefits, the comparative efficacy of different exercise modalities and optimal intervention protocols for specific cognitive domains in older adults remains unclear. Objective: This network meta-analysis aimed to systematically compare the effects of five exercise modalities-resistance training, aerobic exercise, mind-body exercise, multicomponent exercise, and high-intensity interval training (HIIT)-on global cognitive function and major cognitive domains in cognitively healthy older adults, and to identify optimal intervention protocols and population subgroups most likely to benefit. Methods: A total of 58 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included, encompassing 4,349 healthy older adults from diverse geographical regions. Comprehensive searches were conducted in major electronic databases for RCTs evaluating exercise interventions on cognitive outcomes in adults aged 60 years and older. A network meta-analysis assessed the relative effects of each exercise modality on global cognition, executive function (including inhibitory control, task-switching ability, and working memory), and memory function. Subgroup analyses were performed based on intervention frequency, duration, participant age, and geographic region. Results: Resistance training demonstrated the greatest improvement in global cognitive function (SMD = 0.55) and inhibitory control (SMD = 0.31, SUCRA = 82.1%), particularly with twice-weekly sessions of 45 minutes over 12 weeks. Mind-body exercise was most effective for executive function, especially task-switching ability (SMD = -0.58, SUCRA = 85.1%) and working memory (SMD = 2.45), with highfrequency, moderate-duration protocols yielding optimal results. Aerobic exercise was the most effective modality for enhancing memory function (SMD = 0.42). The largest cognitive benefits were observed in participants aged 65-75 years and in studies conducted in Asia. Conclusion: Different exercise modalities provide domain-specific cognitive benefits in healthy older adults. Personalized exercise prescriptions-emphasizing resistance training for global cognition, mind-body exercise for executive function, and aerobic exercise for memory-should be considered in clinical and public health settings. These findings support the integration of structured exercise interventions into aging and dementia prevention strategies, with particular attention to optimal protocol design and population targeting.

Keywords: Exercise, Cognitive Function, Network meta-analysis, older adults, Resistance Training, mind-body exercise, aerobic exercise, Executive Function

Received: 13 Oct 2024; Accepted: 22 May 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Zhang, Ye, Li, Zhang, Li and WU. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Zhijian WU, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.