Abstract
Background:
Theta-gamma coupling (TGC) plays a critical role in working memory (WM) processing, yet it is often dysregulated in mild cognitive impairment (MCI). While gamma activity is known to support cognitive functions, excessive gamma activity in MCI may impair WM. This study investigates how repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) modulates gamma activity by regulating TGC to enhance WM in MCI patients.
Objectives:
This study aims to explore the effects of rTMS on WM by targeting TGC and reducing occipital gamma activity under varying WM loads.
Methods:
We recruited 34 participants, including 20 MCI patients and 14 healthy elderly controls (HC), from Shanghai Tongji Hospital. All participants received a 1 week intervention of 10 Hz rTMS targeting the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Gamma power and TGC were measured using electroencephalography (EEG), and WM performance (accuracy, capacity, reaction time) was assessed through a visual WM paradigm.
Results:
The rTMS intervention significantly reduced gamma power in left occipital region, correlating with improved WM performance (enhanced accuracy, capacity, and faster reaction time). Changes in TGC between left frontal theta and occipital gamma oscillations were significantly associated with WM performance, indicating a neurocognitive link.
Conclusion:
This study highlights rTMS as a non-invasive tool for enhancing WM by modulating TGC and reducing gamma power. These findings suggest a promising strategy for improving cognitive function in MCI, with significant clinical implications for cognitive optimization and therapeutic interventions.
1 Introduction
Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) is a critical precursor to more severe neurodegenerative conditions such as Alzheimer’s Disease (AD), with memory impairment being a significant challenge for affected individuals (). Given that approximately 10%–15% of individuals with MCI progress to AD annually, developing interventions to enhance cognitive function and potentially slow or prevent further decline is of utmost importance ().
Working Memory (WM) is central to the cognitive deficits experienced by individuals with MCI (). The neurophysiological underpinnings of visuospatial working memory (VWM) involve coordinated activity within and between various brain regions, primarily the prefrontal cortex (PFC), occipital, and parietal cortex (). This coordination is reflected in neural oscillations, specifically theta (4–8 Hz) and gamma (30–80 Hz) rhythms, which are thought to underpin the encoding and retrieval of WM (). Additionally, theta-gamma phase-amplitude coupling (PAC) has emerged as a critical neural mechanism supporting various cognitive processes (). In healthy individuals, theta-gamma coupling (TGC) is well-regulated, facilitating efficient cognitive processing (; ). However, in MCI, this coupling is often dysregulated, associated with cognitive dysfunction (; ; ).
Despite the potential of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to enhance cognitive function in patients with MCI, the precise cognitive-neural mechanisms underlying this treatment remain poorly understood (; ; ). Prior studies have debated whether gamma activity increases or decreases in specific brain regions (; ; ; ; ; ; ; , ; ). Additionally, the dynamic changes of TGC throughout various phases of working memory have not been extensively detailed. Our study aims to bridge these gaps by systematically analyzing the changes in gamma activity and TGC before and after rTMS application, thereby advancing our understanding of how precise modulation of neural oscillations can improve cognitive performance in MCI patients.
The study employs a controlled trial involving MCI patients and healthy elderly controls (HCs). Advanced neuroimaging techniques, such as EEG, will be used to monitor changes in neural oscillations and working memory performance before and after the intervention. The primary outcome will be an improvement in WM performance, accompanied by detectable changes in theta-gamma coupling and gamma activity, suggesting underlying neural modifications. The findings of this study could provide valuable insights into the neural mechanisms underlying WM enhancement and offer potential targets for non-invasive brain stimulation techniques aimed at enhancing cognitive function.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Participants
Participants for this study were recruited from the Memory Specialist Clinic within the Department of Neurology at Tongji Hospital, affiliated with Tongji University. The study received ethical approval from the Ethics Committee of Tongji Hospital, Shanghai, China, and all participants provided informed consent. MCI diagnosis was based on established criteria (; ), with participants aged age between 55 and 80 years and having no contraindications for TMS. Exclusion criteria included a history of neurological or psychiatric disorders, significant head trauma, or current use of medications affecting cognitive function. HCs were required to had no memory complaints, exhibit normal cognitive function and demonstrate normal daily living abilities. A total of 50 participants were enrolled, comprising both MCI patients and HCs.
All participants received standardized diagnostic evaluations including computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of the head, blood tests, and comprehensive neuropsychological assessments. These assessments included memory, language, executive function, visual space navigation function, the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) (), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) (), the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) (), and the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA) (). Memory function was measured using the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) (), and the logical memory test (Wechsler memory scale) (). Language function was assessed using the Boston Naming Test () and the Verbal Fluency Test (). Executive function was measured using the Shape Trial Test-A and B (STT-A, STT-B) (Zhao et al., 2013). Visual space navigation function was assessed using the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test (ROCF, including the copy test and the recall test) ().
2.2 rTMS procedure
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation was administered using a Pulsed magnetic Stimulation Device (M-100 Ultimate, Shenzhen Yingchi Technology Co.,Ltd, Shenzhen, China) with a 90 mm-figure-of-eight coil. The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) was targeted based on the Beam F3 system (). The rTMS protocol consisted of high-frequency stimulation at 10 Hz with an intensity of 100% of the resting motor threshold (RMT), Each session delivered a total of 3,000 pulses in 10 s trains with 20 s intertrain intervals. The intervention comprised one daily session lasting approximately 15 min, conducted over a period of 1 week. This optimized protocol balances therapeutic efficacy with safety considerations, adhering to established guidelines for cognitive enhancement research (; ; ; ). The RMT was defined as the minimum stimulation intensity required to elicit a motor evoked potential (MEP) of at least 50 μV in the contralateral first dorsal interosseous muscle, in at least 5 out of 10 trials (). This standardized approach ensured consistent and accurate stimulation intensity across all participants.
2.3 Experimental design
Participants were seated in a quiet room, approximately 60 cm away from a computer screen. The VWM task was administered using Eprime 3.0 software, employing an adapted change detection task (see Figure 1; ; ). Each trial began with a central arrow cue directing participants to memorize items in either the left or right visual hemifield. The EEG data were segmented into three phases based on the timing of the arrow appearance: (1) the Attention phase (1,000–1,500 ms), (2) the Encoding phase (1,500–2,000 ms), and (3) the Retention phase (2,000–3,000 ms). Each participant completed 100 trials per condition [2 items (2T) or 4 items (4T)] in each experiment. The memory array consisted of two colored squares (2T) or four colored squares (4T) presented in each hemifield. Participants were required to indicate whether the test array matched the memory array. Accuracy and mean reaction time were recorded for each participant, and working memory capacity was calculated using Cowan’s K coefficient [K = load × (hit rate - false alarm rate)] (). Participants performed the VWM tasks both before and after the 1 week rTMS intervention to assess changes in performance.
FIGURE 1
2.4 EEG recording and PSD analysis
Electroencephalography data were recorded using a 64-channel portable wireless EEG system (Neuracle, Changzhou, China), and 64-channel Brain Products EEG system (Germany). Data were preprocessed offline using EEGLAB 2020 and custom MATLAB 2017. EEG signals are first segmented into 2 s intervals, and any segment exceeding five times the average intensity is automatically identified as an artifact and removed based on the predefined threshold. The subsequent processing included band-pass filtering (0.5–95 Hz), notch filtering at 50 and 100 Hz to remove power line noise, and artifact removal via independent component analysis (ICA) targeting eye blinks, muscle activity, heartbeats, and channel noise. The data were then segmented into epochs from 1,000 ms pre-stimulus to 2,000 ms post-stimulus, with an artifact rejection threshold set at ± 100 μV. The study utilized the standard frequency bands as follows: delta (0.5–4 Hz), theta (4–8 Hz), alpha (8–12 Hz), beta (12–30 Hz), low-gamma (30–60 Hz), and high-gamma (60–80 Hz). Power spectral density (PSD) for these bands was calculated using the fast Fourier transform (FFT) on 2 s segments of EEG signals, providing a frequency resolution of 0.5 Hz.
Brain regions were divided according to the following electrode allocations: left frontal: Fp1, AF3, AF7, F1, F3, F5, F7, FC1, FC3, FC5; right frontal: Fp2, AF4, AF8, F2, F4, F6, F8, FC2, FC4, FC6; left central: C1, C3, C5, CP1, CP3, CP5; right central: C2, C4, C6, CP2, CP4, CP6; left temporal: FT7, T7, TP7; right temporal: FT8, T8, TP8; left occipital: P3, P5, P7, PO3, PO7, O1; right occipital: P4, P6, P8, PO4, PO8, O2.
2.5 Cross-frequency coupling analysis
This systematic categorization enabled a detailed examination of neural activity across different brain areas. Theta-gamma PAC was calculated using the modulation index method (), and phase-phase coupling (PPC) were also computed. The Hilbert transform was applied to extract the instantaneous phase of theta oscillations (4–8 Hz) and the amplitude envelope of gamma oscillations (30–80 Hz). The modulation index (MI) was computed to quantify PAC between theta phase and gamma amplitude (), The MI quantifies PAC by measuring the deviation of the amplitude distribution from uniformity when binned according to phase. Specifically, the phase was divided into 18 bins (20° each), and the amplitude within each bin formed a distribution.
where N is the number of phase bins, and Piis the normalized amplitude within the i-th bin. This index quantifies the degree of deviation from a uniform distribution, with higher values indicating stronger coupling. The MI reflects the deviation of the amplitude distribution from uniformity, serving as a measure of coupling strength.
2.6 Statistical analysis
All analyses were conducted with SPSS (version 29.0) and RStudio (version 4.1.3). For continuous variables, either the Mann–Whitney U-test (for non-normally distributed data) or Student’s t-test (for normally distributed data) was applied, depending on the data distribution. Categorical variables were analyzed using Pearson’s χ2 test. Spearman correlation analyses were performed to explore relationships between occipital power or TGC and VWM performance. Changes in WM performance, PSD, and TGC following rTMS intervention were evaluated using paired t-tests. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. To control for multiple comparisons, False Discovery Rate (FDR) correction was applied using the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure, with corrected p-values <0.05 considered statistically significant (see as Supplementary Tables 1, 2).
3 Results
3.1 Baseline demographic and neuropsychological characteristics
The study included 34 participants, comprising 20 MCIs and 14 HCs (See as Supplementary Figure 1). As detailed in Table 1, the MCI and HC groups were well-matched in terms of demographic characteristics including age, gender, education, as well as emotional status assessed by HAMA and HAMD (all P > 0.05). As expected, the MCI group exhibited significantly lower scores in global cognitive performance, as measured by MMSE and MoCA (both P < 0.001). Additionally, impairments were observed across specific cognitive domains, including memory (HVLT_IR, HVLT_DR and LMT scores; P < 0.001), executive function (STT-A scores; P < 0.01), visuospatial ability (ROCF_DR scores; P < 0.01), and language (BNT and VFT scores; P < 0.01). The demographic and emotional equivalence between the groups ensures a balanced baseline, minimizing the influence of confounding variables and enhancing the reliability of the study design.
TABLE 1
| Characteristic | HC n = 14 | MCI n = 20 | P |
| Age | 68 (57, 76) | 65 (63, 73) | 0.726a |
| Gender, female (%) | 6 (42.9%) | 10 (50.0%) | 0.681c |
| Education | 12.0 (9.5, 14.3) | 12.0 (9.0, 16.0) | 0.887a |
| MMSE | 28.0 (28.00, 28.75) | 25.5 (24.00, 26.25) | < 0.001***a |
| MoCA | 23.9 ± 3.1 | 17.2 ± 4.2 | < 0.001***b |
| HAMA | 6.0 (3.3, 10.0) | 6.5 (4.8, 11.0) | 0.806a |
| HAMD | 4.5 (1.5, 7.0) | 6.0 (3.0, 8.3) | 0.471a |
| HVLT_IR | 7.95 ± 1.51 | 4.92 ± 1.55 | < 0.001***b |
| HVLT_DR | 7.5 (7.0, 9.8) | 3.0 (0.0, 5.0) | < 0.001***a |
| LMT | 10.21 ± 2.12 | 6.25 ± 2.71 | < 0.001***b |
| BNT | 24.5 (23.0, 27.0) | 20.0 (15.8, 24.3) | 0.009**a |
| VFT | 14.4 ± 3.5 | 10.3 ± 3.7 | 0.002**b |
| STT-A | 48 (40, 54) | 71 (52, 95) | 0.003**a |
| STT-B | 120 (105, 146) | 153 (121, 223) | 0.064a |
| ROCF | 35.5 (35.0, 36.0) | 32.5 (30.0, 36.0) | 0.118a |
| ROCF_DR | 19 (16, 29) | 9 (2, 14) | 0.004**a |
Patient demographics and baseline characteristics.
aWilcoxon rank sum test.
bIndependent Two Sample t-test.
cPearson’s Chi-squared test; Statistical significance evidenced in bold. Values are Median (IQR); Mean ± SD; BNT, Boston Naming Test; HAMA, Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale; HAMD, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale; HVLT_DR, Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Delayed Recall; HVLT_IR, Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Immediate Recall; LMT, Logical Memory Test; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; MoCA, Montreal Cognitive Assessment; ROCF, Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test; ROCF_DR, Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test-Delayed Recall; STT-A, Shape Trail Test-A; STT-B, Shape Trail Test-B; VFT, Verbal Fluency Test.
Statistical significance: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
3.2 Working memory performance post-TMS intervention
Prior to the intervention, under low memory load (2T), the MCI group exhibited significantly lower working memory accuracy and capacity compared to the HC group. Following the 1 week TMS intervention, the MCI group demonstrated significant improvements in working memory performance, as evidenced by increased accuracy, enhanced capacity, and faster reaction times (P < 0.05; see Figure 2). However, there were no statistical differences under high WM load (4T).
FIGURE 2
3.3 Neural changes during low WM load (2T)
Our study investigated the effects of rTMS on occipital gamma power during WM tasks. Importantly, there were no significant baseline differences between MCI and HC groups in either gamma power or theta-gamma coupling (both p > 0.05). The findings revealed a consistent and significant reduction in left occipital gamma power in HCs across WM phases following rTMS administration (see Figures 3A–C). In contrast, patients with MCIs demonstrated only a non-significant trend toward reduced gamma power.
FIGURE 3
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation significantly modulated TGC between the left frontal theta and left occipital gamma oscillations under low WM load condition. Specifically, in individuals with MCI, we observed a significant increase in TGC during the attention phase and a significant decrease during the retention phase (both P < 0.05; see Figures 5A, C; Supplementary Figures 2A,a,C,c).
Further correlation analysis revealed significant relationships between rTMS-induced neural alterations and behavioral performance. Notably, the enhancement of left occipital gamma power throughout the WM process was negatively correlated with improvements in memory capacity (both P < 0.05; see Figures 3a–c). Moreover, the negative correlation between TGC in the retention phase and WM accuracy highlights the crucial role of neural synchronization in cognitive processing (P < 0.05; see Figure 5D).
3.4 Neural changes during high WM load (4T)
Under high WM load, there were no significant baseline differences between MCI and HC groups in gamma power or theta-gamma coupling (both p > 0.05). However, our findings demonstrated a significant decrease in gamma power within the left occipital region throughout the WM process following rTMS in MCI patients (both P < 0.05; see Figures 4A–D). This reduction in occipital gamma power was positively correlated with faster reaction time, indicating improved processing speed (both P < 0.05; see Figures 4a–d).
FIGURE 4
Furthermore, our study explored the effects of rTMS on the coupling between left frontal theta and left occipital gamma oscillations under high WM load condition. A significant decrease in coupling was observed during the encoding phase P < 0.05; see Figure 5B; Supplementary Figures 2B,b.
FIGURE 5
4 Discussion
In this study, rTMS enhanced working memory in MCI patients by improving accuracy, capacity, and reaction time under low WM load but showed no significant effects under high WM load. The neural mechanisms underlying these effects appear to involve rTMS-induced modulation of neural oscillations, specifically through increased TGC during the attention phase and decreased TGC during the retention phase under low memory load condition. Interestingly, while high memory load condition did not yield significant performance improvements, we observed a notable reduction in TGC during the encoding phase. This suggests that the therapeutic efficacy of rTMS may be constrained by task complexity, potentially due to the increased neural resource demands associated with high cognitive load.
4.1 Mechanisms and efficacy of TMS in modulating neural oscillations
4.1.1 Improvements in working memory post-rTMS
The improvements in working memory after rTMS are significant, supporting studies that highlight TMS as a tool for enhancing cognitive functions in MCI (). demonstrated notable cognitive gains in MCI patients, particularly in tasks involving working memory and executive function. This suggests that TMS may improve cognitive processing by modulating neural circuits involved in working memory.
The cognitive-enhancing effects of TMS in low working memory load are mediated through multiple neurophysiological mechanisms. The findings of this study demonstrates that TMS optimizes information processing efficiency, as evidenced by improved accuracy, capacity, and reaction time These improvements primarily depend on the short-term potentiation of local oscillatory synchronization () and synaptic plasticity, which are fundamental processes underlying cognitive enhancement (; ; ). Specifically, the enhancement of theta-slow gamma coupling reflects a compensatory mechanism that maintains spatial working memory performance under increasing task demands (). Furthermore, neuroimaging studies have shown that TMS modulates functional connectivity within key brain networks, particularly the frontoparietal network and default mode network, which are critically involved in working memory processes ().
However, under high cognitive load, the regulatory efficacy could be constrained by the saturation of neural resources, increased competition, and imbalanced resource allocation. While intracranial EEG reveals that TCG activation scales with cognitive difficulty in epilepsy patients (), MCI patients exhibit consistent underperformance across cognitive tasks compared to healthy controls (). This discrepancy suggests that, although significant neural changes are observed in MCI patients, these changes may not be sufficient to overcome the neural resource limitations imposed by high cognitive load. Consequently, these alterations fail to reach the threshold necessary for translating into measurable behavioral improvements.
Moreover, high-load tasks necessitate coordinated cross-frequency coupling across multiple bands. TMS modulation of θ-γ rhythms may disrupt natural frequency interactions, particularly α-γ coupling’s critical role in suppressing irrelevant information (). Left DLPFC stimulation could impair resource allocation, potentially disrupting working memory processes (). This may reduce errors for low-priority items without enhancing high-priority performance, ultimately limiting overall efficacy (). Distinct populations demonstrate varied cognitive strategies under high demands (), highlighting the complexity of neural regulation mechanisms.
4.1.2 Occipital gamma changes associated with rTMS
The nature of gamma activity alterations in AD remains controversial (). While some EEG studies report increased gamma activity (; ; ; ) others demonstrate decreased gamma oscillations (; ; ; ; ). This discrepancy likely stems from methodological variations in brain regions, task paradigms, and EEG recording conditions (resting-state vs. task performance).
Neuroimaging evidence suggests increased activation in the posterior cingulate and medial parietal cortices during task performance in AD patients (), though the underlying oscillatory mechanisms remain unclear. Recent EEG findings provide further insights: older adults with amyloid and tau pathology exhibit elevated low-gamma activity in frontal-central regions during low-load working memory tasks, potentially indicating compensatory mechanisms under reduced cognitive demand (). In AD patients, target detection tasks with simple visual stimuli reveal prolonged reaction times accompanied by abnormal gamma increases (; ). Our findings corroborate these observations, demonstrating a positive correlation between reaction time and left occipital gamma activity during working memory tasks, suggesting a central role of gamma dysregulation in cognitive impairment.
The distinct gamma modulation patterns observed between HCs and MCI patients across varying memory load conditions may reflect fundamentally different neural compensation mechanisms. In HCs, the reduction of gamma activity under low memory load following rTMS intervention suggests an optimization of neural resource allocation, indicating enhanced neural efficiency (Zhao et al., 2017). Similarly, in MCI patients, the observed gamma reduction under high memory load may reflect rTMS-mediated regulation of compensatory over activation, potentially restoring more efficient oscillatory patterns during cognitively demanding tasks, thereby making the regulatory effects of rTMS more pronounced. This load-dependent and population-specific response pattern likely originates from differential neural network reorganization in MCI patients, contrasting with the preserved neural efficiency in HCs, underscoring the complex neurophysiological mechanisms that underlie rTMS-induced cognitive enhancement.
4.1.3 Theta-gamma changes associated with rTMS
The significant neural changes observed, particularly the modulation of TGC by rTMS, offer key insights into the cognitive improvements seen in MCI patients. TGC is crucial for cognitive processes like attention, memory, and executive function (), aiding in the efficient processing and integration of information (; ; ). Disruption of theta-gamma coupling in MCI may contribute to deficits in memory and executive function (; ).
Our findings reveal distinct TGC dynamics across cognitive phases and memory loads. During low working memory load conditions, TGC increases during the attention phase. This phase-specific modulation aligns with TGC’s functional roles: enhanced TGC during attention facilitates neural synchronization for stimulus focus and encoding improvement (), where selective attention determines information maintenance and processing (; ). The decrease during retention may reflect a shift in neural dynamics that optimizes maintain encoded information by minimizing interference from extraneous neural activity.
Under high working memory load, we observed decreased TGC during encoding, particularly in cognitive control networks such as the DLPFC. This reduction likely reflects the brain’s resource allocation strategy, where limited neural resources are prioritized for essential processing demands (; ). The DLPFC, crucial for information management and manipulation, appears particularly sensitive to these load-dependent changes. The application of rTMS to the DLPFC may modulate its functional connectivity with downstream regions (e.g., parietal and occipital cortices), reducing excessive or unnecessary neural synchronization (). This modulation could enhance the precision and efficiency of information encoding, ultimately optimizing cognitive performance under high-load conditions.
Recent advances in neuroimaging have elucidated TGC’s dual role in local processing and long-range cortical communication (; ; ). The demonstrated ability of TMS to modulate TGC underscores its therapeutic potential for MCI. By targeting and potentially restoring disrupted oscillatory dynamics, TMS may offer a promising approach to mitigate cognitive decline through neural network modulation.
4.2 Other cross-frequency coupling mechanisms in working memory
Beyond theta-gamma coupling, other cross-frequency interactions play crucial roles in working memory processes. Alpha-gamma PAC mediates information selection through cyclic inhibition of gamma activity (> 25 Hz) by alpha oscillations (8–12 Hz), with brief gamma disinhibition during alpha troughs facilitating task-relevant information processing (). This coupling mechanism, predominantly observed in parietal-prefrontal networks, serves critical functions in suppressing irrelevant sensory inputs and enhancing multimodal integration in visual and verbal working memory (; ). Experimental evidence demonstrates a positive correlation between alpha-gamma PAC strength and memory load (), with gamma-tACS showing potential to selectively enhance memory accuracy (). The experimental results underscore the critical role of alpha-gamma phase synchronization in mediating neural mechanisms underlying memory formation, attentional control, and higher-order cognitive functions, particularly in terms of task-specific neural dynamics and working memory content-dependent oscillatory patterns ().
Theta-beta coupling (4–8 and 13–30 Hz) supports sequential information storage through temporal organization of beta activity, while theta oscillations modulate prefrontal beta activity to enhance executive control (). Research indicates that prefrontal theta power increases with working memory load, whereas beta activity may maintain task-set stability, with both rhythms coordinating spatial memory and hippocampal-prefrontal synchronization. The age-related decrease in prefrontal theta-beta ratio (TBR) during childhood and adolescence reflects the maturation of attentional control (). Emerging interventions, including neurofeedback and theta-tACS, demonstrate potential in modulating TBR to improve executive functions (). Further evidence of frequency-specific cognitive adaptation comes from beta-band phase-amplitude coupling studies, which demonstrate an inverse relationship between coupling intensity and arithmetic task complexity (). This finding suggests a dynamic, task-dependent reorganization of neural oscillations to optimize cognitive processing.
4.3 Limitations and future directions
While this study makes important contributions to understanding rTMS-induced modulation of TGC and its behavioral correlates, several limitations should be noted. First, the relatively small sample size may limit the generalizability of our findings and increase the risk of Type II errors, underscoring the need for larger-scale studies with longer-term follow-up to evaluate the durability of both cognitive and neural improvements. More importantly, while our findings demonstrate a significant association between rTMS-induced theta-gamma coupling changes and working memory improvement, the lack of sham control in MCI participants and inability to determine oscillatory directionality limit causal interpretation. Future studies should combine active sham protocols with directional connectivity analyses to both verify the rTMS-specific nature of these effects and elucidate whether frontal theta drives occipital gamma modulation during working memory processes.
Additionally, the study primarily relied on visual WM tasks and theta-gamma coupling as neural outcomes, which may not capture the full range of TMS effects. Future research should incorporate additional neural markers (e.g., alpha oscillations, connectivity patterns) and multimodal paradigms to validate the generalizability of findings across different WM domains.
Finally, while this study demonstrates TMS’s potential for enhancing cognition in MCI while revealing significant individual variability in treatment response, which may stem from both the limitations of standardized Beam F3 targeting () and the current lack of AD pathology biomarkers in our study design. Future studies employing MRI-guided neuronavigation for improved targeting precision, combined with biomarker assessment (e.g., p-tau217, neurofilament light) for better patient stratification and machine learning approaches integrating multimodal data, could significantly advance the development of personalized TMS protocols for neurodegenerative disorders.
5 Conclusion
This study demonstrates TMS’s efficacy in enhancing working memory in MCI patients, particularly under low cognitive load, through phase-specific modulation of theta-gamma coupling and occipital gamma power, revealing novel neural mechanisms of cognitive improvement. These findings not only advance our understanding of non-invasive brain stimulation but also highlight neural oscillations as promising therapeutic targets. Future research should continue to explore the mechanisms underlying these effects, as well as the long-term and individualized impacts of TMS on cognitive function.
Statements
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics statement
The studies involving humans were approved by the Ethics Committee of Tongji Hospital, Shanghai, China. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author contributions
XY: Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. ZT: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. RL: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. CP: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review and editing. JM: Data curation, Validation, Writing – review and editing. ML: Data curation, Supervision, Writing – review and editing. DY: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review and editing. HY: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review and editing. FL: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review and editing. ZB: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review and editing. YK: Data curation, Investigation, Conceptualization, Writing – review and editing. YL: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review and editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by the Shanghai Hospital Development Center Foundation (No. SHDC12021110), the Shanghai Committee of Science and Technology, China (No. 22Y11903500), Project funding from Shanghai Municipal Health Commission (No. 2022JC018), STI2030-Major Projects (2022ZD0211600), the Key Discipline Project of Shanghai Pudong Hospital (No. zdxk2020-09), and the National Science Foundation of China (No. 81671307).
Acknowledgments
We are deeply grateful to all participants who volunteered their time and effort to make this study possible. We truly appreciate the constructive comments and suggestions that were provided by the reviewers and editor.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The authors declare that Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnagi.2025.1541126/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AhnJ. S.HeoJ.OhJ.LeeD.JhungK.KimJ.-J.et al (2022). The functional interactions between cortical regions through theta-gamma coupling during resting-state and a visual working memory task.Brain Sci.12:274. 10.3390/brainsci12020274
2
AlbertM. S.DeKoskyS. T.DicksonD.DuboisB.FeldmanH. H.FoxN. C.et al (2011). The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease.Alzheimers Dement.7270–279. 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.008
3
ArnoldL. E.LofthouseN.HerschS.PanX.HurtE.BatesB.et al (2013). EEG neurofeedback for ADHD: Double-blind sham-controlled randomized pilot feasibility trial.J. Atten. Disord.17410–419. 10.1177/1087054712446173
4
AxmacherN.HenselerM. M.JensenO.WeinreichI.ElgerC. E.FellJ. (2010). Cross-frequency coupling supports multi-item working memory in the human hippocampus.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.1073228–3233. 10.1073/pnas.0911531107
5
BaşarE. (2013). A review of gamma oscillations in healthy subjects and in cognitive impairment.Int. J. Psychophysiol.9099–117. 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.07.005
6
BaşarE.FemirB.Emek-SavaşD. D.GüntekinB.YenerG. G. (2017). Increased long distance event-related gamma band connectivity in Alzheimer’s disease.Neuroimage Clin.14580–590. 10.1016/j.nicl.2017.02.021
7
BeamW.BorckardtJ. J.ReevesS. T.GeorgeM. S. (2009). An efficient and accurate new method for locating the F3 position for prefrontal TMS applications.Brain Stimul.250–54. 10.1016/j.brs.2008.09.006
8
BenchenaneK.TiesingaP. H.BattagliaF. P. (2011). Oscillations in the prefrontal cortex: A gateway to memory and attention.Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.21475–485. 10.1016/j.conb.2011.01.004
9
Blanco-DuqueC.ChanD.KahnM. C.MurdockM. H.TsaiL. H. (2024). Audiovisual gamma stimulation for the treatment of neurodegeneration.J. Intern. Med.295146–170. 10.1111/joim.13755
10
BondiM. W.EdmondsE. C.JakA. J.ClarkL. R.Delano-WoodL.McDonaldC. R.et al (2014). Neuropsychological criteria for mild cognitive impairment improves diagnostic precision, biomarker associations, and progression rates.J. Alzheimer’s Dis.42275–289. 10.3233/JAD-140276
11
BonnefondM.JensenO. (2015). Gamma activity coupled to alpha phase as a mechanism for top-down controlled gating.PLoS One10:e0128667. 10.1371/journal.pone.0128667
12
BoydL. A.VidoniE. D.DalyJ. J. (2007). Answering the call: The influence of neuroimaging and electrophysiological evidence on rehabilitation.Phys. Therapy87684–703. 10.2522/ptj.20060164
13
BrooksH.GoodmanM. S.BowieC. R.ZomorrodiR.BlumbergerD. M.ButtersM. A.et al (2020). Theta–gamma coupling and ordering information: A stable brain–behavior relationship across cognitive tasks and clinical conditions.Neuropsychopharmacology452038–2047. 10.1038/s41386-020-0759-z
14
BrooksH.MirjaliliM.WangW.KumarS.GoodmanM. S.ZomorrodiR.et al (2022). Assessing the longitudinal relationship between theta-gamma coupling and working memory performance in older adults.Cereb. Cortex321653–1667. 10.1093/cercor/bhab295
15
BrzezickaA.KamińskiJ.ReedC. M.ChungJ. M.MamelakA. N.RutishauserU. (2019). Working memory load-related theta power decreases in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex predict individual differences in performance.J. Cogn. Neurosci.311290–1307. 10.1162/jocn_a_01417
16
BuzsákiG.DraguhnA. (2004). Neuronal oscillations in cortical networks.Science3041926–1929. 10.1126/science.1099745
17
CanoltyR. T.KnightR. T. (2010). The functional role of cross-frequency coupling.Trends Cogn. Sci.14506–515. 10.1016/j.tics.2010.09.001
18
ChenJ.XiaoY.XuB.ZhangD. (2023). The developmental trajectory of task-related frontal EEG theta/beta ratio in childhood.Dev. Cogn. Neurosci.60:101233. 10.1016/j.dcn.2023.101233
19
ChenK. L.XuY.ChuA. Q.DingD.LiangX. N.NasreddineZ. S.et al (2016). Validation of the Chinese version of montreal cognitive assessment basic for screening mild cognitive impairment.J. Am. Geriatr. Soc.64e285–e290. 10.1111/jgs.14530
20
ChengC. P. W.WongC. S. M.LeeK. K.ChanA. P. K.YeungJ. W. F.ChanW. C. (2018). Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on improvement of cognition in elderly patients with cognitive impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry33e1–e13. 10.1002/gps.4726
21
CowanN. (2001). Metatheory of storage capacity limits.Behav. Brain Sci.24154–176. 10.1017/S0140525X0161392X
22
CroisileB.AuriacombeS.Etcharry-BouyxF.VercellettoM. (2012). [The new 2011 recommendations of the National institute on aging and the Alzheimer’s association on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease: Preclinal stages, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia].Rev. Neurol.168471–482. 10.1016/j.neurol.2011.11.007
23
DaumeJ.GraetzS.GruberT.EngelA. K.FrieseU. (2017). Cognitive control during audiovisual working memory engages frontotemporal theta-band interactions.Sci. Rep.7:12585. 10.1038/s41598-017-12511-3
24
de VriesI. E. J.SlagterH. A.OliversC. N. L. (2020). Oscillatory control over representational states in working memory.Trends Cogn. Sci.24150–162. 10.1016/j.tics.2019.11.006
25
FernándezA.PinalD.DíazF.ZurrónM. (2021). Working memory load modulates oscillatory activity and the distribution of fast frequencies across frontal theta phase during working memory maintenance.Neurobiol. Learn. Mem.183:107476. 10.1016/j.nlm.2021.107476
26
FunahashiS. (2017). Working memory in the prefrontal cortex.Brain Sci.7:49. 10.3390/brainsci7050049
27
GazzaleyA.NobreA. C. (2012). Top-down modulation: Bridging selective attention and working memory.Trends Cogn. Sci.16129–135. 10.1016/j.tics.2011.11.014
28
GongY.XieG.JiangD. (1981). “Revision of the wechsler memory scale,” in In Proceedings of the Third Congress of the Chinese Psychological Association and the 60th Anniversary of the Academic Conference of the Chinese Psychological Association (Fourth National Academic Conference of Psychology) Digest Selection (Lower), (Taylor and Francis).
29
GoodmanM. S.KumarS.ZomorrodiR.GhazalaZ.CheamA. S. M.BarrM. S.et al (2018). Theta-gamma coupling and working memory in Alzheimer’s dementia and mild cognitive impairment [Original Research].Front. Aging Neurosci.10:101. 10.3389/fnagi.2018.00101
30
GuoQ.LuC.HongZ. (2000). Application of the rey-osterrieth complex figure test to normal Chinese elderly.Chinese J. Clin. Psychol.8:3. 10.3969/j.issn.1005-3611.2000.04.003
31
HallettM. (2007). Transcranial magnetic stimulation: A primer.Neuron55187–199. 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.06.026
32
HamiltonM. (1959). The assessment of anxiety states by rating.Br. J. Med. Psychol.3250–55. 10.1111/j.2044-8341.1959.tb00467.x
33
HamiltonM. (1960). A rating scale for depression.J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry2356–62. 10.1136/jnnp.23.1.56
34
HartS.SmithC. M.SwashM. (1988). Word fluency in patients with early dementia of Alzheimer type.Br. J. Clin. Psychol.27115–124. 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1988.tb00759.x
35
HerrmannC. S.MecklingerA. (2001). Gamma activity in human EEG is related to highspeed memory comparisons during object selective attention.Visual Cogn.8593–608. 10.1080/13506280143000142
36
HerrmannC. S.MunkM. H.EngelA. K. (2004). Cognitive functions of gamma-band activity: Memory match and utilization.Trends Cogn. Sci.8347–355. 10.1016/j.tics.2004.06.006
37
HerwigU.SatrapiP.Schönfeldt-LecuonaC. (2003). Using the international 10-20 EEG system for positioning of transcranial magnetic stimulation.Brain Topogr.1695–99. 10.1023/b:brat.0000006333.93597.9d
38
HuM.NitscheM. A.LvY.HanH.LinX.QiF. (2024). The effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic and transcranial direct current stimulation on memory functions in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis [Systematic Review].Front. Hum. Neurosci.18:1436448. 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1436448
39
JiangL.CuiH.ZhangC.CaoX.GuN.ZhuY.et al (2021). Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for improving cognitive function in patients with mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review [systematic review].Front. Aging Neurosci.12:593000. 10.3389/fnagi.2020.593000
40
JohnsonJ. S.FeredoesE.PostleB. R. (2024). “TMS in working memory research,” in The Oxford Handbook of Transcranial Stimulation: Second Edition, edsWassermannE. M.PeterchevA. V.ZiemannU. (Oxford: Oxford University Press). 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198832256.013.34
41
KaiserJ.LutzenbergerW. (2003). Induced gamma-band activity and human brain function.Neuroscientist9475–484. 10.1177/1073858403259137
42
KatzmanR.ZhangM. Y.Ouang, YaQ.WangZ. Y.LiuW. T.et al (1988). A Chinese version of the mini-mental state examination; impact of illiteracy in a Shanghai dementia survey.J. Clin. Epidemiol.41971–978. 10.1016/0895-4356(88)90034-0
43
KhanA.MosbacherJ. A.VogelS. E.BinderM.WehovzM.MoshammerA.et al (2023). Modulation of resting-state networks following repetitive transcranial alternating current stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.Brain Struct. Funct.2281643–1655. 10.1007/s00429-023-02667-2
44
KimJ. W.KimB.-N.LeeJ.NaC.KeeB. S.MinK. J.et al (2016). Desynchronization of theta-phase gamma-amplitude coupling during a mental arithmetic task in children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder.PLoS One11:e0145288. 10.1371/journal.pone.0145288
45
KirovaA. M.BaysR. B.LagalwarS. (2015). Working memory and executive function decline across normal aging, mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer’s disease.Biomed. Res. Int.2015:748212. 10.1155/2015/748212
46
KuY.BodnerM.ZhouY. D. (2015). Prefrontal cortex and sensory cortices during working memory: Quantity and quality.Neurosci. Bull.31175–182. 10.1007/s12264-014-1503-7
47
KyllingsbaekS.BundesenC. (2009). Changing change detection: Improving the reliability of measures of visual short-term memory capacity.Psychon. Bull. Rev.161000–1010. 10.3758/pbr.16.6.1000
48
LenzD.JeschkeM.SchadowJ.NaueN.OhlF. W.HerrmannC. S. (2008). Human EEG very high frequency oscillations reflect the number of matches with a template in auditory short-term memory.Brain Res.122081–92. 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.10.053
49
LichtC.HerbrandtS.van MeegenC.LehfeldH.HillemacherT.RichterK. (2023). A systematic review and meta-analysis of cognitive effects of rTMS in caucasian patients with mild cognitive impairment.Brain Sci.13:1335. 10.3390/brainsci13091335
50
LinY.JiangW. J.ShanP. Y.LuM.WangT.LiR. H.et al (2019). The role of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in the treatment of cognitive impairment in patients with Alzheimer’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.J. Neurol. Sci.398184–191. 10.1016/j.jns.2019.01.038
51
LismanJ E.JensenO. (2013). The theta-gamma neural code.Neuron771002–1016. 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.03.007
52
LiuM.NieZ. Y.LiR. R.ZhangW.HuangL. H.WangJ. Q.et al (2021). Neural mechanism of repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation to enhance visual working memory in elderly individuals with subjective cognitive decline.Front. Neurol.12:665218. 10.3389/fneur.2021.665218
53
LustigC.SnyderA. Z.BhaktaM.O’BrienK. C.McAvoyM.RaichleM. E.et al (2003). Functional deactivations: Change with age and dementia of the Alzheimer type.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A.10014504–14509. 10.1073/pnas.2235925100
54
MillerA.AllenR. J.JumaA. A.ChowdhuryR.BurkeM. R. (2023). Does repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation improve cognitive function in age-related neurodegenerative diseases? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry38:e5974. 10.1002/gps.5974
55
MirjaliliM.ZomorrodiR.DaskalakisZ. J.HillS. L.KumarS.BlumbergerD. M.et al (2022). Cognitive control, interference inhibition, and ordering of information during working memory in younger and older healthy adults.GeroScience442291–2303. 10.1007/s11357-022-00577-5
56
MoscatelliF.TotoG. A.ValenzanoA.CibelliG.MondaV.LimoneP.et al (2023). High frequencies (HF) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) increase motor coordination performances in volleyball players.BMC Neurosci.24:30. 10.1186/s12868-023-00796-2
57
MossF.WardL. M.SannitaW. G. (2004). Stochastic resonance and sensory information processing: A tutorial and review of application.Clin. Neurophysiol.115267–281. 10.1016/j.clinph.2003.09.014
58
PetersenR. C.RobertsR. O.KnopmanD. S.BoeveB. F.GedaY. E.IvnikR. J.et al (2009). Mild cognitive impairment: ten years later.Arch. Neurol.661447–1455. 10.1001/archneurol.2009.266
59
PopovT.JensenO.SchoffelenJ. M. (2018). Dorsal and ventral cortices are coupled by cross-frequency interactions during working memory.Neuroimage178277–286. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.05.054
60
RajjiT. K.ZomorrodiR.BarrM. S.BlumbergerD. M.MulsantB. H.DaskalakisZ. J. (2016). Ordering information in working memory and modulation of gamma by theta oscillations in humans.Cereb. Cortex271482–1490. 10.1093/cercor/bhv326
61
RiddleJ.ScimecaJ. M.PagnottaM. F.InglisB.SheltrawD.Muse-FisherC.et al (2022). A guide for concurrent TMS-fMRI to investigate functional brain networks [Original Research].Front. Hum. Neurosci.16:1050605. 10.3389/fnhum.2022.1050605
62
RochartR.LiuQ.FontehA. N.HarringtonM. G.ArakakiX. (2020). Compromised behavior and gamma power during working memory in cognitively healthy individuals with abnormal CSF Amyloid/Tau.Front. Aging Neurosci.12:574214. 10.3389/fnagi.2020.574214
63
RosanoC.AizensteinH. J.CochranJ. L.SaxtonJ. A.De KoskyS. T.NewmanA. B.et al (2005). Event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation of executive control in very old individuals with mild cognitive impairment.Biol. Psychiatry57761–767. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.12.031
64
RothC. (2011). “Boston naming test,” in Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology, edsKreutzerJ. S.DeLucaJ.CaplanB. (New York: Springer), 430–433. 10.1007/978-0-387-79948-3_869
65
RouxF.UhlhaasP. J. (2014). Working memory and neural oscillations: Alpha–gamma versus theta–gamma codes for distinct WM information?Trends Cogn. Sci.1816–25. 10.1016/j.tics.2013.10.010
66
RyanJ.WoodsR. L.MurrayA. M.ShahR. C.BrittC. J.ReidC. M.et al (2021). Normative performance of older individuals on the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) according to ethno-racial group, gender, age and education level.Clin. Neuropsychol.351174–1190. 10.1080/13854046.2020.1730444
67
SalimpourY.AndersonW. S. (2024). Theta-gamma phase-amplitude coupling supports working memory performance in the human hippocampus.bioRxiv [Preprint]10.1101/2024.03.24.586454
68
StrüberD.HerrmannC. S. (2020). Modulation of gamma oscillations as a possible therapeutic tool for neuropsychiatric diseases: A review and perspective.Int. J. Psychophysiol.15215–25. 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2020.03.003
69
StrüberD.HerrmannC. S. (2022). “145Gamma activity in sensory and cognitive processing,” in The Oxford Handbook of EEG Frequency, (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780192898340.013.8
70
TamuraM.SpellmanT. J.RosenA. M.GogosJ. A.GordonJ. A. (2017). Hippocampal-prefrontal theta-gamma coupling during performance of a spatial working memory task.Nat. Commun.8:2182. 10.1038/s41467-017-02108-9
71
TavanoA.RimmeleJ. M.MichalareasG.PoeppelD. (2023). “Neural oscillations in EEG and MEG,” in Language Electrified: Principles, Methods, and Future Perspectives of Investigation, edsGrimaldiM.BratticoE.ShtyrovY. (Berin: Springer), 241–284. 10.1007/978-1-0716-3263-5_8
72
ThompsonL.KhucJ.SaccaniM. S.ZokaeiN.CappellettiM. (2021). Gamma oscillations modulate working memory recall precision.Exp. Brain Res.2392711–2724. 10.1007/s00221-021-06051-6
73
TortA. B. L.KomorowskiR. W.EichenbaumH.KopellN. J. (2010). Measuring phase-amplitude coupling between neuronal oscillations of different frequencies.J. Neurophysiol.1041195–1210. 10.1152/jn.00106.2010
74
UrsinoM.PirazziniG. (2024). Theta–gamma coupling as a ubiquitous brain mechanism: Implications for memory, attention, dreaming, imagination, and consciousness.Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci.59:101433. 10.1016/j.cobeha.2024.101433
75
van DeursenJ. A.VuurmanE. F.VerheyF. R.van Kranen-MastenbroekV. H.RiedelW. J. (2008). Increased EEG gamma band activity in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment.J. Neural Transm.1151301–1311. 10.1007/s00702-008-0083-y
76
Viejo-SoberaR.Redolar-RipollD.BoixadósM.PalausM.Valero-CabréA.MarronE. M. (2017). Impact of prefrontal theta burst stimulation on clinical neuropsychological tasks.Front. Neurosci.11:462. 10.3389/fnins.2017.00462
77
VogelE. K.MachizawaM. G. (2004). Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity.Nature428748–751. 10.1038/nature02447
78
YaguraH.TanakaH.NakamuraS. (2024). Effects of cognitive load and years of experience on phase-amplitude coupling in simultaneous interpretation.bioRxiv [Preprint]10.1101/2024.05.03.592346
79
YanY.TianM.WangT.WangX.WangY.ShiJ. (2023). Transcranial magnetic stimulation effects on cognitive enhancement in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis [Systematic Review].Front. Neurol.14:1209205. 10.3389/fneur.2023.1209205
80
ZengL.GuoM.WuR.LuoY.WeiP. (2022). The effects of electroencephalogram feature-based transcranial alternating current stimulation on working memory and electrophysiology.Front. Aging Neurosci.14:828377. 10.3389/fnagi.2022.828377
81
ZhangH.ZhaoY.QuY.HuangY.ChenZ.LanH.et al (2022). The Effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on cognition in patients with traumatic brain injury: A protocol for a randomized controlled trial [study protocol].Front. Neurol.13:832818. 10.3389/fneur.2022.832818
82
ZhaoQ.GuoQ.LiF.ZhouY.WangB.HongZ. (2013). The shape trail test: Application of a new variant of the trail making test.PLoS One8:e57333. 10.1371/journal.pone.0057333
83
ZhaoX.LiX.YaoL. (2017). Localized fluctuant oscillatory activity by working memory load: A Simultaneous EEG-fMRI study [original research].Front. Behav. Neurosci.11:215. 10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00215
Summary
Keywords
transcranial magnetic stimulation, theta-gamma coupling, working memory, mild cognitive impairment, cognitive enhancement
Citation
Yuan X, Tu Z, Li R, Pan C, Ma J, Liu M, Yang D, Yang H, Li F, Bie Z, Ku Y and Li Y (2025) Cross-frequency neuromodulation: leveraging theta-gamma coupling for cognitive rehabilitation in MCI patients. Front. Aging Neurosci. 17:1541126. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2025.1541126
Received
10 December 2024
Accepted
17 April 2025
Published
30 April 2025
Volume
17 - 2025
Edited by
Luyao Wang, Shanghai University, China
Reviewed by
Dan Zhang, Tsinghua University, China
Liang Zhou, Lanzhou University, China
Qihao Guo, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China
Updates
Copyright
© 2025 Yuan, Tu, Li, Pan, Ma, Liu, Yang, Yang, Li, Bie, Ku and Li.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Yunxia Li, doctorLiyunxia@163.comYixuan Ku, kuyixuan@mail.sysu.edu.cn
†These authors share first authorship
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.