ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Aging Neurosci.

Sec. Parkinson’s Disease and Aging-related Movement Disorders

Volume 17 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2025.1618764

Objective Assessment of Gait and Posture Symptoms in Parkinson's Disease Using Wearable Sensors and Machine Learning

Provisionally accepted
Lingyan  MaLingyan Ma1Shinuan  LinShinuan Lin2Jianing  JinJianing Jin1Zhan  WangZhan Wang1Xuemei  WangXuemei Wang1Zhonglue  ChenZhonglue Chen2Yun  LingYun Ling2Fei  ZhangFei Zhang2Kang  RenKang Ren2Tao  FengTao Feng1*
  • 1Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
  • 2GYENNO SCIENCE CO., LTD., Shenzhen, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objective Gait and posture symptoms—such as gait impairments, postural instability, and posture deformations—are common in Parkinson’s disease (PD) and closely linked to falls. Traditional assessments using clinical scales are time-consuming and prone to subjective bias. This study aims to predict the severity of gait and posture symptoms using data collected from wearable sensors during a single laboratory-based walking assessment, providing an objective, efficient, and automated evaluation approach. Methods Sensor-based gait parameters were collected from 225 PD participants (mean age 63.15±10.46 years) through a standardized walking assessment. The dataset was randomly split into a training set (80%) and an independent test set (20%) with balanced age, sex, and PD duration. Two machine learning models—Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) —were trained to predict scores for five gait and posture items (#3.9–3.13) from the MDS-UPDRS III. Results XGBoost was chosen as the final model due to its better performance than SVM. Across all five gait and posture items, the models achieved over 80% acceptable accuracy. For items #3.9–#3.11, absolute accuracy surpassed 70%, and macro-F1 scores were above 0.60 in leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV). The model’s performance on the independent test set matched LOOCV results, confirming robustness. A total of 35, 35, 30, 30, and 40 gait features were selected for the predictive models of items #3.9 - #3.13, respectively. Among these, key features with significant clinical relevance were identified. For example, Effective Trial Duration (R=0.522, p <0.001) had a positive correlation, while Shank - Swing RoM - mean (max) (R=-0.629, p <0.001) had a negative correlation with scores on item #3.10. Additionally, 180° Turn - Steps – mean (R=0.482, p <0.001) had a positive correlation with scores on item #3.11. These findings align with known clinical manifestations, reinforcing the clinical relevance of the identified gait features. Conclusion This study demonstrates the feasibility of using wearable sensor data to objectively assess gait and posture symptoms in PD. Though conducted in a clinical setting, the approach may support clinicians through consistent assessments and more frequent monitoring, with potential for future home-based use to enable longitudinal symptom tracking.

Keywords: Parkinson's disease, Gait, Posture, Walking assessment, 0, 0))

Received: 26 Apr 2025; Accepted: 10 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Ma, Lin, Jin, Wang, Wang, Chen, Ling, Zhang, Ren and Feng. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Tao Feng, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.