ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Aging Neurosci.
Sec. Parkinson’s Disease and Aging-related Movement Disorders
Volume 17 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2025.1644543
This article is part of the Research TopicMachine Learning Revolutionizing Aging-Related Movement Disorder DiagnosticsView all articles
Quantitative analysis of gait and balance using deep learning on monocular videos and the Timed Up and Go test in idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus
Provisionally accepted- 1Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
- 2Research Center for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
- 3AICU Corp., Daegu, Republic of Korea
- 4Department of Neurology, School of medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
- 5Department of Medical Informatics, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: A vision-based gait analysis system using deep learning algorithms for simple monocular videos was validated to estimate temporo-spatial gait parameters in idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus (INPH) patients. The Timed Up and Go (TUG) test has been used to reflect risk of falling in INPH patients. The aims of the study were (1) to investigate relationships between temporo-spatial gait parameters measured by a vision-based gait analysis system using monocular videos and TUG scores and (2) to determine whether an automated machine learning model based on these gait parameters could predict falling risk in INPH patients. Methods: Gait data from 59 patients were collected from the vision-based system. All patients were also evaluated with the TUG test. A TUG time of ≥ 13.5 seconds was used as a cut-off to identify potential fallers. Results: TUG scores were negatively correlated with gait velocity, cadence, stride length, and swing phase. TUG scores were positively correlated with step width, stride time, stance phase, double-limb support phase, stride time variability, and stride length variability. The area under the curve for predicting falling risk using the automated machine learning-based model was 0.979. We found that velocity was the most important factor in predicting falling risk with the interpretable method called SHapley Additive exPlanations. Conclusion: This study identified important associations between gait parameters measured by vision-based gait analysis and TUG scores in INPH patients. An automated machine learning model based on gait parameters measured by vision-based gait analysis can predict falling risk with excellent performance in INPH patients. We suggest that our vision-based gait analysis method using monocular videos has the potential to bridge the gap between laboratory testing and clinical assessment of gait and balance in INPH patients.
Keywords: Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH), Timed up and go test (TUG), gait analysis, deep learning, Video-based assessment, Fall Risk Prediction
Received: 10 Jun 2025; Accepted: 24 Sep 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Cho, Kim, Yu, Kang and Jeong. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Kyunghun Kang, kangkh@knu.ac.kr
Sungmoon Jeong, jeongsm00@gmail.com
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.