Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Aging Neurosci.

Sec. Neurocognitive Aging and Behavior

Volume 17 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2025.1661172

Empathy in Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Preliminary Clinical Comparative Study in Southern Switzerland Using the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) and the Story-Based Empathy Task (SET)

Provisionally accepted
Lisa  ArnaudLisa Arnaud1Lucia  MorelliniLucia Morellini1Laura  Rege-ColetLaura Rege-Colet2Alberto  PagnamentaAlberto Pagnamenta3Eleonora  FontanaEleonora Fontana1Marianna  LissiMarianna Lissi1Rosalba  MoreseRosalba Morese4Leonardo  SaccoLeonardo Sacco1*
  • 1Neurocenter of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland
  • 2Clinique romande de readaptation, Sion, Switzerland
  • 3Universita della Svizzera italiana Facolta di scienze biomediche, Lugano, Switzerland
  • 4Universita della Svizzera italiana Facolta di comunicazione cultura e societa, Lugano, Switzerland

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

ABSTRACT Introduction: Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) is a transitional stage between normal aging and dementia, frequently associated with subtle deficits in social cognition. Empathy, a core component of social cognition, encompasses both affective and cognitive dimensions and may be compromised even in prodromal phases of neurodegenerative conditions. Despite its clinical relevance, empathy in MCI remains underexplored, and standardized assessment tools are seldom used in routine diagnostics. Theory of mind is another important aspect of social cognition, and, as with empathy, it is unclear how it is affected at the MCI stage. This study aimed to investigate empathy and theory of mind abilities in individuals with MCI, excluding cases attributable to prodromal frontotemporal dementia, using two validated instruments: the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) and the Story-based Empathy Task (SET). Methods: We conducted a case-control study involving 23 individuals with MCI and 25 cognitively healthy controls. All participants completed the IRI, while a subsample (19 MCI patients) also underwent the SET. The clinical group included both amnestic and non-amnestic MCI subtypes, with heterogeneous etiologies. Group comparisons were performed on IRI subscales and SET indices to assess both self-reported empathy traits and performance-based socio-cognitive abilities. Results: The MCI group exhibited significantly lower scores in the IRI subscales of Empathic Concern and Perspective Taking compared to controls, indicating concurrent affective and cognitive empathy impairments. While no significant differences emerged in individual SET subcomponents, the MCI group showed a significantly lower global SET score, suggesting reduced integrative socio-cognitive performance. These findings should be interpreted with caution given the limited sample size and clinical heterogeneity, which make this a preliminary study. Conclusion: These findings provide preliminary evidence of early empathy-related and theory of mind alterations in MCI, supporting the inclusion of social cognition assessments in standard neuropsychological protocols. The combined use of self-report and task-based instruments may enhance early identification of socio-emotional dysfunctions and inform personalized clinical interventions. The preliminary nature of this study is mainly due to the small sample size and the heterogeneous clinical profiles, which limit generalizability but highlight the need for replication in larger cohorts

Keywords: Mild Cognitive Impairment, social cognition, Empathy, Theory of Mind, Interpersonal Reactivity Index, Story-Based Empathy Task

Received: 11 Jul 2025; Accepted: 29 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Arnaud, Morellini, Rege-Colet, Pagnamenta, Fontana, Lissi, Morese and Sacco. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Leonardo Sacco, Neurocenter of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.