Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Aging Neurosci., 10 December 2025

Sec. Neuroinflammation and Neuropathy

Volume 17 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2025.1667157

This article is part of the Research TopicStroke Research in the Elderly: Addressing Ageism and PrognosticationView all 17 articles

Safety and efficacy of extracranial vertebral artery stenting in elderly patients with symptomatic vertebral artery stenosis

  • Department of Neurology, Beijing Geriatric Hospital, Beijing, China

Objectives: Symptomatic stenosis of the extracranial vertebral artery is an important cause of posterior circulation stroke. Endovascular stenting has shown promise for these lesions, but evidence in patients aged ≥ 70 years is limited. This study assessed perioperative safety and intermediate-term efficacy of extracranial vertebral artery stenting in elderly patients (≥70 years) by comparing rates of complications, restenosis, stroke, and death with those in younger patients.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with symptomatic extracranial vertebral artery stenosis (VAS) treated at our center from 2019 to 2024. Patients were divided into two groups (≥70 vs. <70 years). All patients had failed medical therapy (antiplatelet ± statin) and underwent stent placement. We compared perioperative adverse events, in-stent restenosis (ISR), target-vessel stroke, and any stroke or death between groups.

Results: Among 224 patients (93 aged ≥ 70, 131 aged < 70), technical success was 100%. Median age was 74 (IQR 72–77) in the ≥70 group and 63 (IQR 59–66) in the <70 group. Perioperative complication rates did not differ significantly (4.3% vs. 3.1%; p = 0.721). Over a mean follow-up of 15 months, ISR occurred in 13.5% of ≥70 patients and 17.6% of <70 patients (p = 0.50), and target-vessel stroke occurred in 3.3% vs. 1.6% (p > 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that bare-metal stent use and hyperuricemia independently predicted ISR. However, the combined outcome of any stroke or death was significantly higher in the ≥70 group than in the <70 group (14.6% vs. 3.2%, log-rank p < 0.05), which was largely attributed to more severe atherosclerosis and a higher burden of comorbidities in the older population.

Conclusion: In symptomatic patients with extracranial VAS, endovascular stenting in the elderly (≥70 years) appears comparably safe to younger patients, with similarly low restenosis and target-stroke rates. Use of bare-metal stents and hyperuricemia were associated with higher ISR. These findings support considering vertebral stenting in elderly patients, but emphasize the need for close follow-up.

1 Introduction

Posterior circulation strokes tend to have higher recurrence and mortality rates than anterior circulation strokes. Atherosclerosis of the proximal vertebral artery (V1 segment) is a common cause of posterior ischemic events. In the New England Medical Center Posterior Circulation Registry, 20% of patients with posterior ischemic stroke had V1 vertebral artery lesions (Wityk et al., 1998). Standard medical therapy (antiplatelet agents and vascular risk factor management) is effective for many patients, but those with severe or recurrent stenosis remain at high risk of stroke. Endovascular stenting of extracranial VAS is an attractive option: most studies have demonstrated high technical success and low perioperative risk, with low long-term restenosis and stroke rates (Jenkins and Stewart, 2017). Despite this, the safety and efficacy of vertebral artery stenting in very elderly patients (≥70 years) has not been well studied. Given the aging population and higher prevalence of atherosclerosis in older adults, understanding outcomes in this subgroup is important. We therefore performed a retrospective cohort analysis comparing perioperative and mid-term outcomes of VA stenting in patients aged ≥ 70 years versus those <70 years, to provide evidence for individualized treatment strategies in elderly patients.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Study population

This retrospective one-center study was approved by the ethics committee of Beijing Geriatric Hospital (Approval No. BJLNYY-2022-013), and informed consent was provided by the participants to participate. We reviewed medical records of all patients who underwent endovascular stenting for symptomatic extracranial VAS at Beijing Geriatric Hospital from January 2019 to September 2024. Inclusion criteria were: (1) Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) confirmation of ≥70% stenosis at the origin or V1 segment of a vertebral artery; (2) treatment with stent placement and at least 3 months of angiographic or ultrasound follow-up; (3) prior medical therapy with antiplatelets (single or dual antiplatelet agents) therapy for vascular risk control, yet persisting posterior circulation ischemic symptoms (dizziness, syncope, transient ischemic attack, or stroke) (Ortega-Gutierrez et al., 2019). Exclusion criteria included: non-atherosclerotic stenosis (e.g., dissection, fibromuscular dysplasia), concurrent intracranial aneurysm or AV malformation, prior surgery on the ipsilateral vertebral artery, or allergy to iodinated contrast. Symptomatic stroke was defined by acute positive diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) or subacute FLAIR changes in the posterior circulation.

2.2 Endovascular procedure

The procedures were performed under local anesthesia via either the radial or femoral artery approach. Intravenous heparin was administered intraoperatively to maintain an activated clotting time (ACT) between 250 and 300 s. All patients underwent aortic arch and cerebral angiography to quantitatively assess the degree and length of the stenotic lesions. Endovascular revascularization was subsequently performed based on angiographic findings. The drug-eluting stent(DES) used in this study included Maurora stent (Alain Medical, Beijing, China) and Bridge stent (Shanghai Microport NeruoTech, Shanghai, China). Bare metal stents (BMS) included Carbofilm coated stent (Alvi Medical, Italy), Trump stent and Apollo stent (MicroPort Medical, Shanghai, China). For lesions with severe stenosis (<2 mm in diameter) that impeded stent delivery, pre-dilation was performed using the Secticide balloon (Achieva Medica, Suzhou, China). Under micro-guidewire guidance, the stent was advanced to the stenotic segment of the vertebral artery (V1 segment) and deployed precisely after proper positioning. Distal protection devices were not used. Final angiography confirmed a residual stenosis of less than 15%, with good patency of both the stent and distal vessels. The catheter system was then withdrawn. All procedures were performed by experienced interventional physicians.

2.3 Periprocedural medication

Pre-procedure, all patients received aspirin (100 mg/day) and clopidogrel (75 mg/day) for at least 3 days. A 300 mg clopidogrel loading dose was given if antiplatelet therapy had not been initiated. Post-stenting, dual antiplatelet therapy was continued for at least 6 months, followed by lifelong aspirin.

2.4 Parameters assessed and follow-up

Technical success was defined as residual stenosis <15% after stent deployment. Standardized follow-up was scheduled at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-procedure, then annually, including: neurological examination, carotid duplex ultrasound, laboratory tests. ISR was defined as >50% luminal narrowing within the stented segment as detected by follow-up vascular imaging (either CT angiography or DSA), or based on ultrasound diagnostic criteria: peak systolic velocity (PSV) > 170 cm/s, end-diastolic velocity (EDV) > 45 cm/s, and a PSV ratio ≥ 2.7 (Li et al., 2020). Any new neurological symptoms triggered brain MRI. Data on perioperative complications (stroke, death, major bleeding within 30 days) and long-term outcomes were systematically collected.

2.5 Statistical analysis

Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method with between-group comparisons assessed by log-rank test. Potential predictors of ISR were first evaluated through univariate analysis, with statistically significant variables (P < 0.05) subsequently incorporated into multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models to identify independent risk factors. All statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics (version 29.0, Armonk, NY).

3 Results

3.1 Patient and baseline characteristics

A total of 224 patients were enrolled in this study. The ≥70-year-old group comprised 93 patients [median age 74 (IQR 72–77) years], including 4 who underwent bilateral vertebral artery stenting (total 97 vessels treated). The <70-year-old group included 131 patients [median age 63 (IQR 59–66) years], with five receiving bilateral stenting (total 136 vessels treated). Technical success was achieved in 100% of procedures across both groups. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics did not differ significantly between groups (Table 1).

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Baseline characteristics comparison between groups.

3.2 Periprocedural outcomes

The 30-day complication rate was 4.3% (4/93) in the ≥70-year-old group and 3.1% (4/131) in the <70-year-old group (P = 0.72). In the elderly group, complications included three cases of new-onset stroke—one of which was a fatal cerebral infarction—and one case of transient hypotensive response following radial artery puncture. No major bleeding events occurred in this group. In the younger group, there were two cases of new-onset stroke and two cases of major bleeding (one gastrointestinal and one genitourinary), with no reported deaths. There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of individual adverse events between the two groups (Table 2), suggesting that periprocedural safety was comparable in patients aged ≥ 70 years.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Comparison of perioperative adverse events.

3.3 Follow-up outcomes

After excluding one perioperative death and nine patients lost to follow-up (total exclusions: 10 patients/10 vessels; six from the <70-year cohort and four from the ≥70-year cohort), the remaining 214 patients (100% follow-up compliance) completed a minimum of 3 months of follow-up. The mean follow-up duration was 15 months in the <70-year group and 14 months in the ≥70-year group. ISR is a common complication following vertebral artery stenting (Figure 1). ISR was observed in 22 patients (17.6%) in the younger cohort and 12 patients (13.5%) in the elderly cohort (P = 0.500), indicating no significant difference between groups. Univariate analysis identified the use of BMS, hyperuricemia, and balloon inflation pressure as potential predictors of ISR. Multivariate Cox regression analysis further confirmed that BMS implantation [hazard ratio (HR) 3.334; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.594–6.974] and hyperuricemia (HR 2.899; 95% CI, 1.189–7.067) were independent risk factors for ISR (Table 3).

FIGURE 1
Six grayscale angiographic images labeled A through F, showing blood vessels in the abdominal area. Images illustrate various views, likely contrasting blood flow in different sections of the arterial system. Each image displays intricate vessel branching and shading, highlighting the differences in opacity and structure.

Figure 1. (A) Preprocedural angiography showing severe stenosis of the right vertebral artery. (B) Immediate post-stenting angiogram revealing a widely patent lumen with residual stenosis < 5%. (C) Follow-up angiography at 9 months demonstrating significant in-stent restenosis (ISR) (>50% diameter stenosis) in the right vertebral artery. (D) Preprocedural angiography showing severe stenosis of the left vertebral artery. (E) Immediate post-stenting angiogram demonstrating adequate lumen restoration with residual stenosis < 10%. (F) Follow-up angiography at 12 months showing severe ISR (> 70% diameter stenosis) in the left vertebral artery.

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Cox regression analysis showing factors associated with in-stent restenosis (ISR).

During the follow-up period, a total of two patients (1.6%) in the <70-year-old group experienced target vessel territory strokes—one with a pontine infarction and one with an occipital lobe infarction. In the ≥70-year-old group, three patients (3.3%) suffered strokes in the target vessel territory, including one pontine infarction, one thalamic hemorrhage, and one midbrain infarction. There was no significant difference in the incidence of target vessel territory strokes between the two groups (Figure 2).

FIGURE 2
Line graph showing target lesion-related stroke percentage over a 21-month follow-up period for two age groups: over seventy in red and under seventy in blue. Both lines remain near zero throughout. The log-rank P-value is 0.337. A table below shows the number at risk and events for each group at various intervals.

Figure 2. Kaplan-Meier curve of target lesion-relate stroke.

In the <70-year-old group, any stroke or death occurred in four patients (3.2%), including one pontine infarction, one occipital lobe infarction, one anterior circulation infarction, and one death due to frontal lobe hemorrhage following glioma surgery. In contrast, 13 patients (14.6%) in the ≥70-year-old group experienced stroke or death, comprising one pontine infarction, one thalamic hemorrhage, one midbrain infarction, seven minor anterior circulation strokes, one death due to traumatic intracranial hemorrhage, one pneumonia-related death, and one fatal massive middle cerebral artery embolism secondary to atrial fibrillation. The incidence of any stroke or death was significantly higher in the ≥70-year-old group compared to the <70-year-old group (Figure 3). Within the ≥ 70-year-old group, a sex-stratified analysis was performed for the occurrence of any stroke or death. Among 67 male patients, 13 (19.4%) experienced any stroke or death during follow-up, whereas 2 of 30 female patients (6.7%) had such events (P = 0.137). There was no significant association between sex and the occurrence of any stroke or death.

FIGURE 3
Kaplan-Meier plot showing cumulative occurrence of stroke or death over 21 months. Two lines represent age groups: red for age 70 and above, blue for below 70. The red line shows a higher percentage of events, indicating greater risk. Log-rank P-value is 0.002, highlighting significant differences. A table below shows number at risk and events for each group.

Figure 3. Kaplan-Meier curve of any stroke or death.

4 Discussion

There is currently no consensus on whether stent implantation or conservative medical therapy is more appropriate for patients with symptomatic vertebral artery stenosis. The SAMMPRIS (Derdeyn et al., 2014) trial demonstrated that for intracranial arterial stenosis, medical therapy alone was superior to stenting combined with medical therapy. The VAST (Compter et al., 2015) trial showed that the periprocedural risk of vascular events was higher in the stenting group than in the medical group. However, most adverse events in the stenting group occurred in patients receiving intracranial vertebral artery stenting, while those undergoing extracranial vertebral artery stenting had a lower incidence of periprocedural complications. In 2017, the VIST (Markus et al., 2017) study, which mainly focused on extracranial vertebral artery stenosis, indicated that the stenting group had fewer periprocedural complications compared to the medical group. Although no significant statistical difference was observed in the incidence of vertebrobasilar strokes during follow-up, a favorable trend toward stenting benefit was noted.

Moreover, a meta-analysis (Markus et al., 2019) combining data from the SAMMPRIS, VIST, and VAST trials suggested that stenting might benefit patients with extracranial vertebral artery stenosis. A review (Xu et al., 2022) based on these three studies also concluded that there was no significant difference in the short- or long-term risk of stroke, death, or transient ischemic attack (TIA) between patients receiving endovascular therapy plus medical treatment and those receiving medical treatment alone. Importantly, the anatomical location of the lesion—particularly the distinction between intracranial and extracranial stenosis—should not be overlooked in the management of symptomatic vertebral artery stenosis. An increasing number of studies have supported the safety and efficacy of stenting for symptomatic extracranial vertebral artery stenosis, especially at the vertebral artery origin. Currently, there is no evidence indicating that endovascular treatment is contraindicated in patients with medically refractory extracranial vertebral artery stenosis (El Koussa et al., 2022; Jing et al., 2025).

With the rise in life expectancy and the aging population, the incidence of vascular stenosis is increasing, and there is growing attention to endovascular therapy in the elderly (Halandras, 2019). To date, no studies have evaluated the safety and efficacy of stenting for symptomatic extracranial vertebral artery stenosis based on age stratification. This study found that the perioperative safety of vertebral artery stenting in symptomatic patients with vertebral artery stenosis aged ≥ 70 years was comparable to that of patients < 70 years. The rates of ISR and target vessel stroke recurrence were also similar between the two groups, with both groups exhibiting low event rates. Ma et al. (2021) included 101 patients who underwent rapamycin-eluting stent implantation in the vertebral artery, with a mean age of 62.87 ± 8.41 years. The perioperative stroke incidence was 0%. During an average follow-up of 12 months, the ISR rate was 5.9%, and the target vessel stroke recurrence rate was 2%, while the overall mortality rate was 6.1%. Li et al. (2020) included 137 patients who underwent vertebral artery stenting, including 76 patients with DES and 74 patients with BMS, with a mean age of 64 years. The perioperative adverse event rate in the DES group was 6.6%, and in the BMS group was 4.1%. During an average follow-up of 24 months, the ISR rate was 18.4% in the DES group and 31.1% in the BMS group, while the target vessel stroke recurrence rate was 8.7%. The results of these studies are consistent with our findings and align with previous research (Gupta et al., 2006; Langwieser et al., 2014; Maciejewski et al., 2019). Notably, the median age of the ≥70-year group in our study was 74 years, substantially higher than in previous studies, while the <70-year group had a median age of 63 years, comparable to past research. These findings demonstrate that stenting remains a safe and effective treatment option in patients aged ≥ 70 years.

The higher rate of any stroke in the ≥70-year group was mainly attributed to small infarcts in the anterior circulation. Except for one case of fatal massive cerebral embolism due to atrial fibrillation, no stroke with NIHSS > 4 was observed. Aging exacerbates vascular endothelial dysfunction, and atherosclerosis is a hallmark of vascular aging (Tyrrell et al., 2020). Oxidative stress and inflammation appear to be the two main underlying mechanisms (Tesauro et al., 2017; Watanabe and Hashimoto, 2022). Carotid atherosclerosis is regarded as a reflection of systemic atherosclerosis (Ihle-Hansen et al., 2023), and the increased incidence of anterior circulation small infarcts in older patients may be related to carotid artery disease. Studies have shown that carotid plaques increase the risk of cerebral infarction by 1.5 times. Severe carotid plaques significantly increase the risk of non-lacunar infarcts in the anterior circulation (RR 3.2 [95% CI, 1.1–9.7]) and lacunar infarcts (RR 10.8 [95% CI, 1.7–69.7]), but do not increase the risk in the posterior circulation (RR 0.6 [95% CI, 0.1–4.9]) (Hollander et al., 2002). Cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD), which becomes more prevalent with age, frequently affects the white matter and accounts for approximately 25% of ischemic strokes (Chojdak-Łukasiewicz et al., 2021). Both extracranial and intracranial atherosclerosis are associated with white matter hyperintensities seen in CSVD (Zhang et al., 2023), which may partly explain the high incidence of anterior circulation small strokes in the elderly. In our study, the all-cause mortality rate was higher in the elderly group, consistent with findings that age is an independent predictor of all-cause death (Sella et al., 2022). Other studies have suggested that age, comorbidities, modified Rankin Scale scores, and the number of vascular risk factors are associated with long-term outcomes after stroke in older adults. Although short-term functional outcomes may be similar between elderly and younger patients after adjusting for neurological deterioration, long-term survival in the elderly is often compromised by a higher burden of risk factors and comorbid complications such as pneumonia and cardiovascular diseases (Naess et al., 2014). Furthermore, as direct evidence regarding sex-related differences in stroke incidence after vertebral artery stenting remains limited in previous studies, we conducted a sex-stratified analysis among patients aged ≥ 70 years with symptomatic vertebral artery stenosis. No statistically significant difference was observed between males and females; however, male patients tended to have a higher risk of any stroke or death compared with females (19.4% vs. 6.7%). Given the relatively small sample size of our study, larger multicenter investigations are warranted to clarify whether sex serves as an independent risk factor for stroke and death following vertebral artery stenting.

In addition, we found that the increased risk of ISR was not associated with age, but was independently correlated with stent type and hyperuricemia. BMS were more prone to ISR than DES. The main difference between the two is that DES are coated either on the surface or inside with drugs that inhibit vascular endothelial cell proliferation. The continuous release of the drug from the stent can limit the proliferation and migration of smooth muscle cells in the stented vessel, thereby inhibiting in-stent thrombosis and preventing restenosis (Si et al., 2022). Several studies have shown that DES is superior to BMS in reducing ISR (Jia et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2024), consistent with our findings. Serum uric acid, a byproduct of purine metabolism, has been reported to promote neoatherosclerosis within stents. This may occur through mechanisms involving the stimulation of inflammatory cytokines and reduced nitric oxide (NO) production, thereby impairing endothelial function (Gu et al., 2024). Other studies suggest that hyperuricemia may induce smooth muscle cell proliferation and increase the formation of thin-cap fibroatheromas, rendering plaques more vulnerable and increasing ISR risk (Zhao et al., 2017). ISR is a multifactorial complication influenced by sample size, follow-up duration, postoperative medication, technical factors, and surgical expertise.

This study has several limitations. First, this study is a single-center retrospective analysis, lacking randomization, and the patient selection for enrollment may have been subject to selection bias. Second, the average follow-up period of 15 months may be insufficient to fully assess ISR, target-vessel stroke, and other late events. Third, the sample size was relatively small, particularly in the ≥70-year group.

5 Conclusion

The use of extracranial vertebral artery stenting in elderly patients with symptomatic VAS has yielded favorable ISR outcomes and demonstrated a positive trend in clinical safety, including a low incidence of periprocedural complications and mid-term target-vessel territory strokes. Although the rate of any stroke or death was higher in patients aged ≥ 70 years, this was primarily attributed to underlying atherosclerosis rather than the procedure itself. Therefore, age ≥ 70 should not be considered a contraindication for stenting. This study provides an alternative treatment option for managing VAS in elderly patients. However, further prospective studies are needed to confirm the long-term clinical benefits of vertebral artery stenting in this population.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by Beijing Geriatric Hospital Ethics Committee; all authors are affiliated with this institution. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Author contributions

MW: Formal analysis, Writing – original draft. ZZ: Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization, Supervision.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article.

Acknowledgments

We thank the staff of the Department of Interventional Neurology, Beijing Geriatric Hospital, for their valuable support and technical assistance.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The authors declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Chojdak-Łukasiewicz, J., Dziadkowiak, E., Zimny, A., and Paradowski, B. (2021). Cerebral small vessel disease: a review. Adv Clin Exp Med. 30, 349–356. doi: 10.17219/acem/131216

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Compter, A., Van Der Worp, H. B., Schonewille, W. J., Vos, J. A., Boiten, J., Nederkoorn, P. J., et al. (2015). Stenting versus medical treatment in patients with symptomatic vertebral artery stenosis: a randomised open-label phase 2 trial. Lancet Neurol. 14, 606–614. doi: 10.1016/s1474-4422(15)00017-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Derdeyn, C. P., Chimowitz, M. I., Lynn, M. J., Fiorella, D., Turan, T. N., Janis, L. S., et al. (2014). Aggressive medical treatment with or without stenting in high-risk patients with intracranial artery stenosis (SAMMPRIS): the final results of a randomised trial. Lancet 383, 333–341. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(13)62038-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

El Koussa, R., Graft, J., Linder, S., and Bansal, V. K. (2022). Outcomes of endovascular stenting in symptomatic vertebral artery ostial stenosis. Cureus 14:e21465. doi: 10.7759/cureus.21465

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Gu, N., Liu, Z., Wang, Z., Shen, C., Zhang, W., Tian, H., et al. (2024). Association between serum uric acid levels and neoatherosclerosis. Int. Heart J. 65, 4–12. doi: 10.1536/ihj.23-058

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Gupta, R., Al-Ali, F., Thomas, A. J., Horowitz, M. B., Barrow, T., Vora, N. A., et al. (2006). Safety, feasibility, and short-term follow-up of drug-eluting stent placement in the intracranial and extracranial circulation. Stroke 37, 2562–2566. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000242481.38262.7b

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Halandras, P. M. (2019). Vascular surgery and geriatric patients. Clin. Geriatr. Med. 35, 93–101. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2018.08.008

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Hollander, M., Bots, M. L., Del Sol, A. I., Koudstaal, P. J., Witteman, J. C., Grobbee, D. E., et al. (2002). Carotid plaques increase the risk of stroke and subtypes of cerebral infarction in asymptomatic elderly: the Rotterdam study. Circulation 105, 2872–2877. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000018650.58984.75

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ihle-Hansen, H., Vigen, T., Berge, T., Walle-Hansen, M. M., Hagberg, G., Ihle-Hansen, H., et al. (2023). Carotid plaque score for stroke and cardiovascular risk prediction in a middle-aged cohort from the general population. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 12:e030739. doi: 10.1161/jaha.123.030739

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Jenkins, J. S., and Stewart, M. (2017). Endovascular treatment of vertebral artery stenosis. Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis. 59, 619–625. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2017.02.005

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Jia, B., Zhang, X., Ma, N., Mo, D., Gao, F., Sun, X., et al. (2022). Comparison of drug-eluting stent with bare-metal stent in patients with symptomatic high-grade intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. 79, 176–184. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.4804

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Jing, S., Jia, B., An, K., Li, N., Guo, H., Li, X., et al. (2025). Comparative efficacy of drug-eluting stents vs. bare-metal stents in symptomatic vertebral artery stenosis: a prospective single-center study. J. Clin. Neurosci. 136:111299. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2025.111299

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Langwieser, N., Prothmann, S., Buyer, D., Poppert, H., Schuster, T., Fusaro, M., et al. (2014). Safety and efficacy of different stent types for the endovascular therapy of extracranial vertebral artery disease. Clin. Res. Cardiol. 103, 353–362. doi: 10.1007/s00392-013-0659-x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, L., Wang, X., Yang, B., Wang, Y., Gao, P., Chen, Y., et al. (2020). Validation and comparison of drug eluting stent to bare metal stent for restenosis rates following vertebral artery ostium stenting: a single-center real-world study. Interv. Neuroradiol. 26, 629–636. doi: 10.1177/1591019920949371

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ma, G., Song, L., Ma, N., Raynald, Shuai, J., Wu, W., et al. (2021). Safety and efficacy of rapamycin-eluting vertebral stents in patients with symptomatic extracranial vertebral artery stenosis. Front. Neurol. 12:649426. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.649426

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Maciejewski, D. R., Pieniazek, P., Tekieli, L., Paluszek, P., Przewlocki, T., Tomaszewski, T., et al. (2019). Comparison of drug-eluting and bare metal stents for extracranial vertebral artery stenting. Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej 15, 328–337. doi: 10.5114/aic.2019.87887

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Markus, H. S., Harshfield, E. L., Compter, A., Kuker, W., Kappelle, L. J., Clifton, A., et al. (2019). Stenting for symptomatic vertebral artery stenosis: a preplanned pooled individual patient data analysis. Lancet Neurol. 18, 666–673. doi: 10.1016/s1474-4422(19)30149-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Markus, H. S., Larsson, S. C., Kuker, W., Schulz, U. G., Ford, I., Rothwell, P. M., et al. (2017). Stenting for symptomatic vertebral artery stenosis: the vertebral artery ischaemia stenting trial. Neurology 89, 1229–1236. doi: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000004385

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Naess, H., Gjerde, G., and Waje-Andreassen, U. (2014). Ischemic stroke in patients older and younger than 80 years. Acta Neurol Scand. 129, 399–404. doi: 10.1111/ane.12199

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ortega-Gutierrez, S., Lopez, G. V., Edgell, R. C., Mendez, A. A., Dandapat, S., Roa, J. A., et al. (2019). Second generation drug-eluting stents for endovascular treatment of ostial vertebral artery stenosis: a single center experience. Front. Neurol. 10:746. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00746

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Sella, G., Gandelman, G., Tuvali, O., Volodarsky, I., Cuciuc, V., Haberman, D., et al. (2022). Utilization of drug-coated balloons for the treatment of coronary lesions in the elderly population. J. Clin. Med. 11:2616. doi: 10.3390/jcm11092616

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Si, J. H., Ma, N., Gao, F., Mo, D. P., Luo, G., and Miao, Z. R. (2022). Effect of a drug-eluting stent vs. bare metal stent for the treatment of symptomatic intracranial and vertebral artery stenosis. Front. Neurol. 13:854226. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.854226

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Tesauro, M., Mauriello, A., Rovella, V., Annicchiarico-Petruzzelli, M., Cardillo, C., Melino, G., et al. (2017). Arterial ageing: from endothelial dysfunction to vascular calcification. J. Intern. Med. 281, 471–482. doi: 10.1111/joim.12605

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Tyrrell, D. J., Blin, M. G., Song, J., Wood, S. C., Zhang, M., Beard, D. A., et al. (2020). Age-associated mitochondrial dysfunction accelerates atherogenesis. Circ. Res. 126, 298–314. doi: 10.1161/circresaha.119.315644

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Watanabe, R., and Hashimoto, M. (2022). Aging-related vascular inflammation: giant cell arteritis and neurological disorders. Front. Aging Neurosci. 14:843305. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.843305

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wityk, R. J., Chang, H. M., Rosengart, A., Han, W. C., Dewitt, L. D., Pessin, M. S., et al. (1998). Proximal extracranial vertebral artery disease in the New England Medical Center Posterior Circulation Registry. Arch. Neurol. 55, 470–478. doi: 10.1001/archneur.55.4.470

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Xu, R., Zhang, X., Liu, S., Wang, X., Wang, W., Yang, K., et al. (2022). Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting for vertebral artery stenosis. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 5:Cd013692. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013692.pub2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, W., Fu, F., and Zhan, Z. (2023). Association between intracranial and extracranial atherosclerosis and white matter hyperintensities: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Aging Neurosci. 15:1240509. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1240509

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, Y., Li, W., and Zhang, L. (2024). Efficacy and safety of drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in symptomatic intracranial and vertebral artery stenosis: a meta-analysis. Front. Neurol. 15:1389254. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1389254

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao, J., Chen, H., Liu, N., Chen, J., Gu, Y., Chen, J., et al. (2017). Role of hyperhomocysteinemia and hyperuricemia in pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 26, 2695–2699. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.10.012

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: vertebral artery stenosis, elderly, stroke, in-stent restenosis, atherosclerosis

Citation: Wu M and Zhang Z (2025) Safety and efficacy of extracranial vertebral artery stenting in elderly patients with symptomatic vertebral artery stenosis. Front. Aging Neurosci. 17:1667157. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2025.1667157

Received: 16 July 2025; Revised: 31 October 2025; Accepted: 26 November 2025;
Published: 10 December 2025.

Edited by:

Nicola Logallo, Haukeland University Hospital, Norway

Reviewed by:

Xiaopu Zhou, University of Toronto, Canada
Qazi Zeeshan, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, United States

Copyright © 2025 Wu and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Zhiyong Zhang, emhpeW9uZ196aGFuZzg4OEAxMjYuY29t

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.