Romantic relationship quality has been related to physical health, mental health, diet and physical activity (). Indeed, it would be optimal to have a supporting romantic relationship. However, global marriage rate is declining (https://ourworldindata.org/marriages-and-divorces). Furthermore, infidelity in romantic relationship is also increasing. Back in the year 2000, only about 8% of Chinese people were sexually unfaithful to their partners whereas by 2015, this rate had jumped to more than 24% (). Evolutionarily speaking, how does this trend of subpar romantic relationship impact on human species? Moreover, will subpar romantic relationship affect human population health or even longevity?
Although not receiving much attention in previous researchers, the influence of romantic relationship on aging is an important consideration (). Despite the widely acclaimed benefits of being single, a significant body of research has supported the link between satisfactory romantic relationship and successful aging. In 1858, the famous epidemiologist William Farr suggested the longevity advantage of marriage in French men (). A recent longitudinal study (N = 7,641) indicates men who were continuously married aged more successfully (physical wellness, mental wellness, social wellness, and self-rated wellness) than their never-married counterparts (). Furthermore, another longitudinal study (N = 974) with participants reported their romantic status at four phases (age 26, 32, 38 and 45) points to the association between slower biological aging (19 biomarkers and facial aging) and high-quality romantic relationship in both men and women (). Marriage was also found to be associated with a slower epigenetic aging ().
Nevertheless, the relationship between romantic relationship status and aging is complex. Singlehood has not been consistently associated with accelerated aging. Using data from the 2016 US Health and Retirement Study (aged 50–100, N = 3,765), Yu et al. failed to find prominent epigenetic aging difference between single and married people after controlling for sociodemographic characteristics, economic resources, depressive symptoms, and health behaviors (). Furthermore, if marriage does indeed slower aging process, what is the underlying mechanism? A secure romantic relationship, rooted in attachment theory, may foster a sense of security, elevate Oxytocin levels, thereby mitigating the stress response and bolstering immune function (). However, recent study failed to identify significant difference in mental and physical health between single and married population (). Another study found that the odds ratio of meeting the WHO physical activity recommendations was 40% higher in single than in married participants (). Presumably, potential moderators or confounders in the relationship between marriage and aging should be considered.
Overall mental wellbeing has been shown to have a more prominent impact (1.65 years) on biological aging than the marital status (0.59 years) alone (). Indeed, researchers have found that with increasing age, having a partner is less predictive of psychological health and the satisfaction with being single increased (). Among all psychological factors, subjective quality of sleep (0.44 years) has the largest impact on aging (). Moreover, a recent large cohort study (N = 589) suggests an association between poor sleep quality and accelerated brain aging, even in midlife (). In a sample of 154 middle-aged to older adults, it has been found that decelerated cellular aging (represented by telomere length) is associated with better sleep quality (assessed via Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index) (). Irrespective of marital status, sharing a bed with a partner has been linked with better sleep quality (). Indeed, being married alone does not guarantee a good sleep quality since sleep quality was found to be correlated with couple relationship quality in a meta-analysis (). No significant difference in sleep quality was found between married and single U.S. () and Japanese people (). Consequently, based on the scientific evidence, sleep quality may act as an unaddressed mediator in the intricate relationship between marriage status and aging.
As global trends indicate a staggering increase in both singlehood and the aging population, further comprehensive research is imperative and warranted to thoroughly investigate the complex interplay between aging and the dynamics of romantic relationships. Mental wellbeing, especially subjective sleep quality, was found to be significantly associated with aging. Based on current evidence, subjective sleep quality can be assumed to moderate the relationship between marital status and aging. Future research should explore the interplay between subjective and objective sleep quality, biological aging, and marital status, alongside other mental and physical health indicators, potentially through a prospective cohort study. If, as predicted, sleep quality is the most pivotal factor mediating the relationship between marital status and aging, individuals without partners can still decelerate aging process through improvement of sleep quality. In addition to general strategies to improve sleep hygiene (i.e., keep a consistent sleep schedule), specific interventions tailored to this singlehood-sleep quality-aging pathway could be explored and investigated to optimize sleep quality and mitigate aging in single individuals. Examples may include: sleeping with a soothing stuffed toy or sleeping with an artificial intelligence (A.I.) voice companion. Future studies are warranted to find the most effective strategy.
Oscar Wilde, the world-renowned Irish poet once said “To love oneself is the beginning of a lifelong romance.” Indeed, even amidst the trend of singlehood and population aging, we can still embrace the journey of self-love and find romance in the pursuit of health and youth. Furthermore, the secret to the fountain of youth might be sleep.
Statements
Author contributions
J-YC: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article.
Conflict of interest
The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
ApostolouM.TekeşB.KagialisA.LajunenT. J. (2024). Aspects of quality of life: single vs. Mated people. Behav. Sci.14, 954. 10.3390/bs14100954
2
BögerA.HuxholdO. (2020). The changing relationship between partnership status and loneliness: effects related to aging and historical time. Journals Gerontology - Ser. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci.75, 1423–1432. 10.1093/geronb/gby153
3
BourassaK. J.CaspiA.HarringtonH. L.HoutsR.PoultonR.RamrakhaS.et al (2020). Intimate partner violence and lower relationship quality are associated with faster biological aging. Psychol. Aging35, 1127–1139. 10.1037/PAG0000581
4
CavaillèsC.DinticaC.HabesM.LengY.CarnethonM. R.YaffeK. (2024). Association of self-reported sleep characteristics with neuroimaging markers of brain aging years later in middle-aged adults. Neurology103, e209988. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000209988
5
ChenJ.-H.WaiteL. J.LauderdaleD. S. (2015). Marriage, relationship quality, and sleep among U.S. Older adults. J. Health Soc. Behav.56, 356–377. 10.1177/0022146515594631
6
CribbetM. R.CarlisleM.CawthonR. M.UchinoB. N.WilliamsP. G.SmithT. W.et al (2014). Cellular aging and restorative processes: subjective sleep quality and duration moderate the association between age and telomere length in a sample of middle-aged and older adults. Sleep37, 65–70. 10.5665/sleep.3308
7
DrewsH. J.WallotS.BryschP.Berger-JohannsenH.WeinholdS. L.MitkidisP.et al (2020). Bed-sharing in couples is associated with increased and stabilized REM sleep and sleep-stage synchronization. Front. Psychiatry11, 583. 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00583
8
GalkinF.KochetovK.KoldasbayevaD.FariaM.FungH. H.ChenA. X.et al (2022). Psychological factors substantially contribute to biological aging: evidence from the aging rate in Chinese older adults. Aging14, 7206–7222. 10.18632/AGING.204264
9
GellatlyC.StörmerC. (2017). How does marriage affect length of life? Analysis of a French historical dataset from an evolutionary perspective. Evol. Hum. Behav.38, 536–545. 10.1016/J.EVOLHUMBEHAV.2017.02.002
10
HoM.PullenayegumE.BurnesD.Fuller-ThomsonE. (2024). The association between trajectories of marital status and successful aging varies by sex: findings from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA). Int. Soc. Work68, 88–111. 10.1177/00208728241267791
11
LuoW.YuJ. (2022). Sexual infidelity among the married in China. Chin. J. Sociol.8, 374–397. 10.1177/2057150X221108574
12
MatsumotoY.UchimuraN.IshitakeT. (2022). The relationship between marital status and multifactorial sleep in Japanese day workers. Sleep. Biol. Rhythms20, 211–217. 10.1007/s41105-021-00357-2
13
MaunderR. G.HunterJ. J. (2008). Attachment relationships as determinants of physical health. J. Am. Acad. Psychoanal Dyn. Psychiatry36, 11–32. 10.1521/jaap.2008.36.1.11
14
PuciatoD.RozparaM. (2021). Physical activity and socio-economic status of single and married urban adults: a cross-sectional study. PeerJ9, e12466. 10.7717/peerj.12466
15
RentscherK. E.KlopackE. T.CrimminsE. M.SeemanT. E.ColeS. W.CarrollJ. E. (2023). Social relationships and epigenetic aging in older adulthood: results from the Health and Retirement Study. Brain Behav. Immun.114, 349–359. 10.1016/J.BBI.2023.09.001
16
SailerL. L.HaghaniA.ZollerJ. A.LiC. Z.OphirA. G.HorvathS. (2024). Epigenetic aging studies of pair bonding in prairie voles. Sci. Rep.14 (1), 17439–13. 10.1038/s41598-024-67641-2
17
WangX. X.LinQ.LiuX.DongP.BaoY.QueJ.-Y.et al (2025). The association between couple relationships and sleep: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep. Med. Rev.79, 102018. 10.1016/j.smrv.2024.102018
18
YuY. L. (2023). Current marital status and epigenetic clocks among older adults in the United States: evidence from the health and retirement study. J. Aging Health35, 71–82. 10.1177/08982643221104928
Summary
Keywords
aging, sleep, marriage, singlehood, single, longevity, anti-aging
Citation
Chuang J-Y (2025) Do single people age faster? The answer may lie in sleep. Front. Aging 6:1521401. doi: 10.3389/fragi.2025.1521401
Received
01 November 2024
Accepted
11 September 2025
Published
18 September 2025
Volume
6 - 2025
Edited by
Filipe Cabreiro, University of Cologne, Germany
Reviewed by
Corina Satler, University of Brasilia, Brazil
Updates
Copyright
© 2025 Chuang.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Jie-Yu Chuang, xiliwu3@gmail.com
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.