Mapping the global research landscape and trends of older people living alone: a bibliometric analysis

Background: The global aging trend is becoming increasingly severe, leading to a rise in the number of older adults living alone. As research on this population grows, a comprehensive analysis is essential.

Objective: This study examines the current state of research on older adults living alone, identifies key trends and emerging topics, and provides a foundation for future investigations.

Methodology: We conducted a subject search in the Web of Science (WOS) Core Collection database, retrieving articles related to older adults living alone based on titles, abstracts, and keywords from 1965 to 2024. Using CiteSpace (version 6.4.R1 Advanced), we generated collaborative networks among countries and authors, revealing research hotspots and frontiers in this field.

Results: The study identified 740 relevant articles, showing an overall upward trend in publications. South Korea and China emerged as major contributors, though research remains decentralized. A total of 1,136 cited authors contributed to this field. Recent advances include the application of spatial recognition technology and artificial intelligence to prevent hazardous events among older adults living alone, highlighting a shift toward personalized and intelligent care solutions.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that older adults living alone represent an emerging focus in nursing research, yet international collaboration remains limited. The integration of intelligent devices and technologies to address caregiving challenges has become a prominent research hotspot in recent years.

1 Introduction

The global phenomenon of population ageing presents significant challenges. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), by 2030, one in six people worldwide will be aged 60 years or older. During this period, the proportion of the population aged 60 and above is projected to rise from 1 billion in 2020 to 1.4 billion. By 2050, the global population of individuals aged 60 and older is expected to double, reaching 2.1 billion. Among those aged 65 and above, an increasing proportion live alone, defined as those without spouses or children for companionship. This trend is becoming more prevalent across various countries due to demographic shifts and evolving social structures.

In Australia, approximately 25.4% of individuals aged 65 and over live alone (Rodwell, 2022). Similarly, in South Korea, the number of older adults living alone surged to 1.379 million in 2015, reflecting a 1.8-fold increase since 2005, with projections estimating a rise to 3.43 million by 2035—constituting 23.2% of the older adult population (Byeon, 2021a). In Japan, more than 15% of older adults lived alone as of 2005 (Sun et al., 2007). Both cross-sectional and longitudinal studies (Blanchard et al., 2003) indicate that older adults living alone face a higher risk of disability, mental health issues, and cognitive decline compared to those living with spouses or others (Koukouli et al., 2002; van Gelder et al., 2006; You and Lee, 2006). Due to their heightened need for social support and long-term care, this specific population encounters challenges such as difficulty managing emergencies, loneliness, and daily living struggles. Consequently, developing tailored health management strategies for older adults living alone—based on their unique characteristics and needs—has become a pressing societal concern (Baines and Hollingsworth, 1955).

In recent years, the growing population of older adults living alone has attracted increasing research attention, gradually establishing this as an emerging research focus. However, a systematic and comprehensive analysis of this field remains lacking. Bibliometrics, a branch of informatics, examines document structures and quantitative characteristics to perform both quantitative and qualitative analyses (Ninkov et al., 2022). This approach enables measurement of profile distributions, relationships, and clustering within research fields while comparing contributions across authors, institutions, countries, and journals (Hassan and Duarte, 2024). Recognized as crucial for developing guidelines, identifying research hotspots, and assessing trends, bibliometrics provides valuable insights into resource management, research collaboration, developmental trajectories, and journal impacts - making it particularly suitable for analyzing research concerning older adults. For example, Hong et al. (2022) conducted a bibliometric analysis of smart home technologies for older adults, demonstrating how well-designed smart homes can support aging-in-place preferences while generating economic benefits through reduced care expenditures. Similarly, Marziali et al. (2024) performed a bibliometric review of voice assistant technologies, highlighting their potential to mitigate loneliness and social isolation among older adults. Additional applications include, Zhang et al. (2023)’s investigation of oral health’s relationship to quality of life in aging populations, and Tan et al. (2021)’s examination of cardiovascular disease’s association with sarcopenia and subsequent disability risks. Given the distinct challenges faced by older adults living alone - including reduced quality of life, increased mental health vulnerability (Park et al., 2023a; Park et al., 2023b), and limited social support networks (Yeh and Lo, 2004), - a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of this field is urgently needed. Such an analysis would provide valuable insights into current research trends and facilitate better understanding of developments concerning this vulnerable population.

The advancement of electronic technologies, including infrared wireless sensors and artificial intelligence, has led to increasing applications of smart devices such as wearable bracelets and smart speakers (Park and Kim, 2022) for monitoring older adults living alone and preventing falls and other accidents (O’Brien et al., 2020; Alharbi et al., 2023). This study employs CiteSpace (version 6.4.R1 Advanced) to examine global research trends, core research foci, and scientific frontiers concerning older adults living alone. Through analysis of recent literature and citation networks, we identify leading research institutions, their collaborative networks, and emerging thematic trends in this field. Using bibliometric methods, we systematically analyze current research progress on older adults living alone. Our study aims to establish a solid scientific foundation for future research, with the dual objectives of expanding scholarly understanding and facilitating further investigations in this important area.

2 Methods

2.1 Data Sources and literature selection

We conducted our literature search using the Web of Science (WOS) Core Collection database. To ensure comprehensive coverage, we implemented a Topic Search (TS) strategy encompassing titles, abstracts, and keywords. The selection criteria for included literature were: (1) publication date prior to 31 December 2024; (2) focus on older adults living alone; (3) English-language publications; and (4) peer-reviewed articles and review papers. The literature search was finalized on 31 December 2024. Complete search strategies are presented in Supplementary Table S1.

2.2 Visual analysis software

The CiteSpace (version 6.4.R1 Advanced), a Java-based application developed by Dr. Chaomei Chen at Drexel University, is specifically designed for co-occurrence and co-citation analysis to visualize research trends and scientific frontiers. This software facilitates data importation, node selection, parameter configuration, and network visualization, enabling researchers to identify key research hotspots, emerging trends, and pivotal nodes within a given field.

2.3 Data analysis

We exported complete bibliographic data, including full article details and citations, from the Web of Science (WOS) Core Collection. For data processing efficiency, we exported records in plain text (TXT) format and imported them into CiteSpace for analysis. This dataset enabled the generation of scientific knowledge maps that visualize knowledge processing, structural relationships, and thematic evolution within the research domain. Our analysis employed a time-slicing approach from 1 January 1965 to 4 March 2024, with annual segmentation to examine longitudinal trends.

To identify evolving research themes, we analyzed term bursts within the literature. Node centrality indices were calculated to evaluate the relative importance of research concepts within the network, based on both the quantity and quality of connections. Higher centrality values indicate more influential nodes that play pivotal roles in information dissemination and research direction. These calculations utilized co-citation relationships in CiteSpace (version 6.2.R6 Advanced).

We implemented several analytical refinements: (1) a Top N = 50 threshold to focus on the most significant items per time slice; (2) the Pathfinder network pruning algorithm to enhance network clarity; and (3) Kleinberg’s (Kleinberg, 2002) to pinpoint emerging research frontiers, thereby improving our understanding of current developments and future trajectories in the field.

3 Results

3.1 Distribution of articles by publication years

Based on relevant MeSH terms related to older adults living alone, we initially conducted a broad search using a fuzzy retrieval strategy, which yielded 92,264 research articles. Given the excessive number of results, we randomly selected 2,000 articles for manual screening and found that only 38 met the inclusion criteria for studies specifically focused on older adults living alone. Subsequently, we applied a more targeted search strategy, which identified only 78 relevant articles. To ensure a more comprehensive and accurate inclusion of literature in this field, we further analyzed thematic descriptions related to older adults living alone and employed a refined retrieval strategy combining precise terms with short phrases. This approach ultimately resulted in the inclusion of 740 eligible articles. The detailed screening process is illustrated in Figure 1. The annual publication trend (Figure 2) exhibits a fluctuating yet overall upward trajectory, indicating that “older adults living alone” has progressively gained recognition as a significant societal issue, attracting growing scholarly attention. Research on this population has evolved into a distinctive feature of contemporary aging studies. The international collaboration network (Figure 3A) revealed a high-density cooperative pattern (n = 64, E = 67, density = 0.0332). Here, the E-value serves as an indicator of research novelty, quantifying breakthrough potential, while density reflects keyword co-occurrence strength, representing thematic cohesion within the field. These findings underscore robust international collaboration in this domain, emphasizing the collective nature of global research efforts and transnational cooperation trends in studies on older adults living alone.

Figure 1

Figure 1. The flow diagram.

Figure 2

Figure 2. The global trend of study of older people living alone publication from 1965 to 2023.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Distribution of countries/regions, authors and cited authors, institutions. (A) Map of country/regional cooperation network analysis. (B) Map of institution cooperation network analysis. (C) Map of author cooperation network analysis. (D) Map of cited author analysis.

3.2 Country/Region analysis

Among the 740 publications focusing on older adults living alone, researchers from at least 64 countries contributed to the literature. Table 1 lists the top 10 countries by publication volume. South Korea leads with 144 publications, though its centrality index (0.02) suggests limited international collaboration. China ranks second with 139 publications and a centrality index of 0.1, reflecting its strong position in the research network. The United States (122 publications, centrality 0.24), Japan (82 publications, centrality 0.12), and the United Kingdom (55 publications, centrality 0.19) also play prominent roles, demonstrating active engagement in this field. Australia, Taiwan, Canada, Sweden, Spain, and Italy occupy the sixth to 10th positions, with varying publication counts and centrality indices. Notably, Australia’s low centrality (0.01) indicates minimal influence, whereas Canada’s high centrality (0.23) underscores its pivotal role in international collaborations on this topic.

Table 1

Table 1. Top 10 countries/regions contributing to publications.

3.3 Institutional analysis

A total of 452 institutions worldwide have conducted research on older individuals living alone, but only four have published more than 10 papers (Supplementary Table S2). Among these, Yonsei University leads with 21 publications, followed by Seoul National University (SNU) with 19. The institutional research network exhibits low density (n = 452, E = 511, density = 0.005) (Figure 3B), suggesting limited collaboration and highlighting the need for stronger inter-institutional cooperation.

3.4 Distribution of authors

A total of 697 authors have contributed to research on older adults living alone, with the top 11 most prolific authors listed in Supplementary Table S3. Park YH ranks first with 12 articles, demonstrating significant academic leadership in this field. Cho B follows closely with six articles, securing second place and reflecting substantial research contributions. These findings highlight the prominent role of these authors while emphasizing the international and diverse nature of research in this field.

The author collaboration network (Figure 3C) exhibits low density (n = 697, E = 846, density = 0.0035), suggesting limited connectivity despite some cooperative efforts. This implies that while prolific authors collaborate to some extent, broader research networks remain underdeveloped and require further strengthening.

3.5 Co-citation network analysis

Co-citation network analysis (Figure 3D) revealed a low-density collaboration pattern (n = 1,136, E = 3,841, density = 0.006), indicating limited connectivity among cited authors. These findings suggest that while certain core researchers have made significant contributions, the overall collaborative network remains fragmented, highlighting opportunities for enhanced interdisciplinary cooperation to advance the field.

3.6 Keyword Co-occurrence analysis

Keyword co-occurrence analysis provides a methodological approach for identifying research hotspots within academic fields. Consistent with annual publication trends, this study analyzed keywords extracted from titles and abstracts of 740 articles, producing a co-occurrence network with 582 nodes and 2,896 links (Figure 5A). The relatively sparse co-citation links compared to other bibliometric analyses (Tan et al., 2023) suggest weaker inter-article connections, lower thematic coherence, and more dispersed research patterns in studies of older adults living alone. This pattern further indicates limited collaboration among researchers in this field.

Table 2 lists the top 10 most frequent keywords. “Health” appears as the predominant term, highlighting its central role in the discourse. “People” ranks second, while “older adults” places third but with lower centrality, reflecting its broad application across diverse research contexts. Other significant keywords include “living alone,” “loneliness,” and “adults,” demonstrating their frequent use in this research domain. Notably, “risk” shows strong associations with older adults living alone, typically denoting vulnerability and appearing across multiple research areas. CiteSpace’s keyword time zone visualization (Figure 5B) further illustrates the temporal evolution of these high-frequency keywords.

Table 2

Table 2. Top 10 keywords Co-occurrence with the most frequency.

3.7 Keyword burst analysis

To identify emerging research trends in studies of older adults living alone, we analyzed keywords demonstrating significant citation bursts (Figure 4). The top twenty-five keywords with the highest burst intensity between 2003 and 2024 were identified, representing sudden increases in citation frequency that indicate shifting research priorities and scholarly developments.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Top 25 keywords with the strongest citation bursts.

“Older women” showed the earliest citation burst (2003–2013; intensity = 3.62), suggesting substantial research activity on this demographic during that period. Subsequently, “disability” emerged as a focus (2010–2016; intensity = 3.66), reflecting growing attention to disabled older adults. The concept of “quality of life” gained prominence (2012–2017), coinciding with increased scholarly emphasis on wellbeing in this population. More recently, “system” and “fall detection” exhibited citation bursts (2017–2018 and 2017–2020, respectively), highlighting the integration of smart technologies in aging research.

Most notably, “intervention” and “social isolation” experienced recent citation surges (2021–2022 and 2021–2024, respectively), underscoring heightened academic interest in psychological support and social connectivity for older adults living alone. These patterns collectively indicate a rapidly evolving field with expanding research directions.

3.8 Keyword Co-Citation cluster analysis

The log-likelihood ratio algorithm categorized 582 keywords into 14 distinct clusters (Figure 5C), with a mean silhouette value (S) of 0.757 for clusters 0–13. The S-index, which integrates citation and collaboration networks, provides a comprehensive measure of research impact. Each cluster was labeled using representative keywords, with “cognitive function” emerging as the largest cluster, indicating its prominence in research on older adults living alone. The second and third largest clusters were “machine learning” and “living arrangements,” respectively. Other clusters included “community care,” “dementia,” “population,” “general practitioner,” and “elderly women,” reflecting the diverse research trajectories within this field. These clusters are visualized in a timeline view for enhanced interpretation (Figure 5D).

Figure 5

Figure 5. Keyword co-occurrence network analysis. (A) Map of keyword co-occurrence network analysis. (B) Keywords Time zone chart. (C) Keywords Cluster analysis map. (D) Keywords Time line view.

A staged analysis of these clusters revealed distinct temporal patterns (Figure 6). From 1965 to 2002 (Figure 6A), research primarily examined basic aspects such as diet, nutrition education, and risk factors, predominantly through ecological studies and randomized controlled trials. Between 2003 and 2012 (Figure 6B), trend analysis gained prominence, focusing on cognitive testing and dementing diseases while expanding geographically to include regions like Sydney and Palestine. The period from 2013 to 2017 (Figure 6C) saw increased attention to quality-of-life factors, including health status, loneliness, and chronic pain, alongside the introduction of technologies like wireless sensor networks. From 2018 to 2020 (Figure 6D), research shifted toward living arrangements, late-life cognitive function, and smart home applications, incorporating activity recognition technologies. Most recently (2021–2024) (Figure 6E), studies have expanded into advanced domains such as community care and anomaly detection, employing multifaceted approaches to enhance elderly wellbeing. We analyzed the top five most frequent keywords across different categories (Table 3). In the emerging technologies category, the highest frequency keywords were: machine learning (n = 16), deep learning (n = 5), wireless sensor network (n = 3), artificial intelligence (n = 3), and ambient intelligence (n = 3). For disease conditions, the most common keywords were health (n = 161), depression (n = 58), mental health (n = 56), dementia (n = 23), and Alzheimer’s disease (n = 10). Regarding research methods, the top keywords included prevalence (n = 40), association (n = 36), risk factors (n = 24), validity (n = 18), and thematic analysis (n = 2). In the intervention variables category, living alone appeared most frequently (n = 92), followed by social support (n = 59), care (n = 52), quality of life (n = 46), and physical activity (n = 30). For intelligent systems, the top terms were activity recognition (n = 18), ambient assisted living (n = 12), smart homes (n = 4), fall detection (n = 2), and assistive robotics (n = 1).

Figure 6

Figure 6. The keyword cluster analysis revealed five distinct chronological phases: (A) 1965–2002; (B) 2003–2012; (C) 2013–2017; (D) 2018–2020; and (E) 2021–2024.

Table 3

Table 3. Top 5 keywords in each category.

4 Discussion

Our study analyzed the literature on older adults living alone from 1965 to 2024. The increasing trend in publications reflects sustained scholarly interest and advancements in research on solitary aging. Notably, publications grew gradually from 2008 to 2017 before rising sharply after 2017, indicating heightened academic and practical engagement with this topic. This trend aligns with the earlier rapid growth in the proportion of older adults living alone, underscoring the importance of synthesizing research in this field.

Globally, South Korea and China lead in research on solitary older adults, excelling in scientific output, publication volume, and academic influence. In South Korea, institutions such as Seoul National University (SNU) and Yonsei University have laid a strong foundation for this research area. In China, the high publication output and contributions from scholars like Chen Y at Fudan University highlight the country’s significant role. Although the United Kingdom produces fewer publications, institutions like the University of London play a key role in international collaborations. Conversely, the United States and Japan have substantial publication volumes but exhibit limited cross-border collaboration, with no single institution dominating domestic output.

Researchers such as Park YH, Chang SJ, and Byeon H have made prolific contributions, demonstrating substantial influence in the field. Park YH, for instance, advocates for community-based integrated service (CBIS) models grounded in Aging-in-Place (AIP) principles to better support the health and daily living needs of solitary older adults. Additionally, the highly cited works of Lawton MP and Kharicha K exemplify the impact of influential, high-quality research in advancing this discipline.

The keyword cluster analysis yielded several significant insights. Based on these findings, we further categorized the keywords and examined their relationships across five domains: emerging technologies, disease status, research methods, intervention variables, and smart systems. This comprehensive analysis provides a holistic perspective on current research trends while offering targeted directions for future studies. In the emerging technologies category, high-frequency terms such as “machine learning,” “ambient intelligence,” “deep learning,” and “wireless sensor network” indicate the growing prominence of AI-IoT integration in health monitoring and care for older adults living alone (Rajasekaran et al., 2009; Byeon, 2021b). The disease conditions category featured prevalent terms including “depression,” “mental health,” “dementia,” and “Alzheimer’s disease,” underscoring substantial academic focus on mental health and cognitive impairment among solitary older adults - a critical concern in aging societies (Cermakova et al., 2017; Tamminen et al., 2019; Koo et al., 2021). Analysis of research paradigms revealed common keywords like “prevalence,” “association,” “risk factors,” “validity,” and “thematic analysis,” demonstrating an evolution from descriptive studies to more sophisticated correlational and empirical investigations, marking methodological maturation in the field (Yang et al., 2023; Park et al., 2025). Among intervention variables, predominant terms such as “living alone,” “social support,” “care,” and “quality of life” highlight the centrality of social support systems in enhancing wellbeing for this population (Renwick et al., 2020). The intelligent systems category featured keywords including “activity recognition,” “ambient assisted living,” “smart homes,” “fall detection,” and “assistive robotics,” illustrating the transformative potential of technology-enabled home care solutions in addressing accessibility and sustainability challenges in elder care (Daniele et al., 2019).

Keywords that experience sudden increases in citations are recognized as indicators of emerging research themes or trends. Our analysis identified multiple research streams within the field of solitary older adults, encompassing a wide array of topics. The majority of studies concentrate on enhancing quality of life, family and social support, intelligent assistive technologies, and social isolation among older adults living alone. As emerging technologies continue to advance, smart devices are expected to play an increasingly prominent role in mitigating loneliness, improving quality of life, and preventing or detecting hazardous events such as falls.

Our keyword citation trend analysis reveals that global research hotspots on solitary older adults can be categorized into five distinct phases. Phase 1 (1965–2003) is characterized by a limited number of publications and weak thematic connections, which explains its absence from the burst keyword timeline.

Phase 2 (2003–2012). Research began focusing on gender-specific studies of solitary older adults, particularly older women, as reflected in keywords such as “older women” and “home.” Health disparities by gender were evident; for instance, a cross-sectional study in Taiwan found that women aged 65 and older living alone faced a 1.6 times higher risk of depression than their male counterparts, especially those over 85 with limited social support (Lin and Wang, 2011). Gender differences also emerged in coping with memory loss, with women with Alzheimer’s disease actively reconstructing self-awareness (Frazer et al., 2012). Familial dependence was pronounced, with many older adults preferring to age and die at home, influenced by their physical environment, socioeconomic conditions, and access to care (Rolls et al., 2011). This phase thus emphasized more nuanced, gender-sensitive research.

Phase 3 (2013–2017). Research shifted toward enhancing quality of life and societal support for solitary older adults, as indicated by keywords like “support,” “quality of life,” “disability,” and “ambient assisted living.” A central focus was maintaining independence despite health challenges. Studies highlighted that depression and social isolation were more prevalent among those lacking support, leading to poorer quality of life (Lee and Kim, 2014; Parlar Kilic et al., 2014; Arslantas et al., 2015; McHugh et al., 2015). Effective interventions mitigated loneliness and improved dietary, physical, and mental health (Bilotta et al., 2012; McHugh et al., 2015). Disability research advocated for better healthcare access and non-emergency transport to prevent treatment delays (Henning-Smith et al., 2016).

Phase 4 (2018–2020). This phase was marked by the rise of electronic and wearable technologies, with keywords such as “fall detection,” “network,” “system,” and “machine learning.” Smart devices leveraging IoT, sensors, and AI enhanced safety and quality of life (Huh, 2018; Wang et al., 2019).

Phase 5 (2021–2024). Attention returned to physical and mental health, with keywords like “social isolation,” “aging in place,” and “intervention.” AI advancements enabled precise applications for improving social support and quality of life, addressing heightened risks of cognitive decline and depression (Lee et al., 2020). Technologies such as infrared sensors (Wang et al., 2022; Yang et al., 2022), IoT (Luperto et al., 2023), deep learning (Khraief et al., 2020), and wearable devices has progressed rapidly, providing tools for social support and cognitive improvement (Choi et al., 2022). AI-based home devices alleviated depression and loneliness (Park and Kim, 2022; Yan et al., 2024). while psychological and neurodegenerative issues received renewed focus (Parlar Kilic et al., 2014; Breaz, 2019; Charpentier and Kirouac, 2022). Strategies to improve life satisfaction were urged (Hou and Zhang, 2023). Non-technological factors, like pet ownership, were also explored; a cohort study found pets slowed verbal memory decline (Li et al., 2023). Another study further indicated that pet companionship may enhance wellbeing in this population, thereby mitigating feelings of loneliness and cognitive decline (Stanley et al., 2014). Notably, research employing AI-powered robotic pets has shown that integrating these companions into daily life—while iteratively refining their design based on user feedback—can effectively reduce loneliness and facilitate social engagement among isolated older adults with limited social connections (Hudson et al., 2020). Sum up this phase emphasized intelligent technologies and cognitive health in elder care.

Several crucial research hotspots—including “living arrangements,” “living alone,” “daily rhythm,” “intervention,” “climate change,” “care,” “general practitioner,” “elderly caregiving microsystem,” and “nutrient intakes”—are not prominently featured in visual maps but remain significant. Among these, studies on malnutrition, living arrangements, and daily rhythms are particularly noteworthy. Malnutrition represents a global health risk for older adults. A Norwegian cross-sectional study revealed that older adults living alone struggle to maintain adequate nutrition through self-care activities (Tomstad et al., 2012), highlighting the need for healthcare professionals to identify at-risk individuals and provide nutritional guidance. Furthermore, loneliness is a significant predictor of anorexia nervosa, malnutrition, and malnutrition risk (Ramic et al., 2011), suggesting that reducing loneliness may improve both nutritional intake and quality of life.

Consistent evidence indicates that older adults living alone have poorer nutritional intake than their married counterparts (Pequignot et al., 1967; Yamagami et al., 1998; Charlton, 1999; Hsieh et al., 2010; Tomstad et al., 2012). For instance, an Israeli policy survey found that low-income solitary men consumed fewer vegetables, fruits, and vitamin C than those with partners (Guggenheim and Margulec, 1965). Given that vitamin C deficiency increases scurvy risk, living alone emerges as an independent risk factor for poor nutrition in older adults (Oulie, 1988). Given that vitamin C deficiency increases scurvy risk, living alone emerges as an independent risk factor for poor nutrition in older adults.

Positive living arrangements and structured daily rhythms significantly influence the physical and mental health of older adults living alone. Daily activities typically encompass social interactions, physical exercise, hobbies, and community-based engagements (Cederbom et al., 2014). Research indicates that solitary older adults tend to exhibit lower physical activity levels and higher body fat percentages, increasing their susceptibility to hypertension, deep vein thrombosis, and other cardiovascular conditions (Kong and So, 2017). Implementing regular physical activity regimens, such as Tai Chi, Baduanjin, and walking, has been shown to enhance mental health, reduce loneliness and depression, and strengthen social connections, thereby fostering a greater sense of dignity among this population (Wu et al., 2024). Intervention programs like forest therapy in Korea have demonstrated dual benefits by addressing psychological loneliness while promoting healthier lifestyles, consequently reducing dementia risk (Jin and Son, 2018b; Jin and Son, 2018a). Similarly, structured community activities—including group exercises and art projects—have proven effective in improving both physical and mental wellbeing (Kil et al., 2018; Kim et al., 2018; Aydin and Kutlu, 2021; Beselt et al., 2023). Collectively, these findings underscore the critical role of maintaining positive living arrangements and consistent daily routines, which not only enhance functional independence but also facilitate meaningful social interactions. Such insights highlight daily schedules and living environments as viable targets for interventions aimed at supporting solitary older adults.

In summary, our bibliometric analysis of literature spanning 1965 to 2024 elucidates key trends and emerging themes in research on older adults living alone. This synthesis underscores the field’s evolution, advocating for multidisciplinary collaboration and innovative integration of intelligent technologies to address this population’s complex needs. By combining supportive living environments with proactive healthcare strategies, future efforts can deliver more compassionate and effective care solutions.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Author contributions

Y-DW: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft. J-XD: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Resources, Visualization, Writing – original draft. F-MY: Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Writing – review and editing. Z-HD: Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Writing – review and editing. WM: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Visualization, Writing – review and editing. YC: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Resources, Validation, Writing – review and editing. Y-QC: Investigation, Resources, Software, Writing – review and editing. YM: Conceptualization, Project administration, Software, Validation, Writing – review and editing. XC: Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review and editing. Y-RW: Conceptualization, Investigation, Resources, Software, Visualization, Writing – review and editing. H-JL: Software, Validation, Writing – review and editing. SW: Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – review and editing. Y-XT: Data curation, Formal analysis, Resources, Validation, Writing – review and editing. Y-DN: Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – review and editing. NC: Formal Analysis, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. G-WZ: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work is financially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (72201119), the Public Livelihood Foundation of the Department of Science and technology of Liaoning Province [2021JH2/10300014], Basic Research Project for Higher Education Institutions by the Liaoning Provincial Department of Education (3110024142), 2024 National Project Support Program of the School of Nursing, China Medical University (2024-FC5), and Science and Technology Projects in Liaoning Province (2023JH2/20200056).

Conflict of interest

Author YM was employed by Goodwill Information Technology Co., Ltd. Authors Y-RW, H-JL were employed by Shenyang Medical & Film Science and Technology Co., Ltd.

The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fragi.2025.1524673/full#supplementary-material

References

Alharbi, H. A., Alharbi, K. K., and Ul Hassan, C. A. (2023). Enhancing elderly fall detection through IoT-enabled smart flooring and AI for independent living sustainability. Sustainability 15 (22), 15695. doi:10.3390/su152215695

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Arslantas, H., Adana, F., Ergin, F. A., Kayar, D., and Acar, G. (2015). Loneliness in elderly people, associated factors and its correlation with quality of life: a field study from western Turkey. Iran. J. Public Health 44 (1), 43–50.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Aydin, M., and Kutlu, F. Y. (2021). The effect of group art therapy on loneliness and hopelessness levels of older adults living alone: a randomized controlled study. Florence Nightingale J. Nurs. 29 (3), 271–284. doi:10.5152/fnjn.2021.20224

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Baines, A. H., and Hollingsworth, D. F. (1955). The diets of elderly women living alone. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 14 (1), 77–80. doi:10.1079/pns19550016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Beselt, L. J., McDonough, M. H., Hewson, J., and Din, C. (2023). Social support and social barriers for participating in group physical activity among older women living alone. Qual. Res. Sport Exerc. Health 15 (6), 819–834. doi:10.1080/2159676x.2023.2230216

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bilotta, C., Bowling, A., Nicolini, P., Case, A., and Vergani, C. (2012). Quality of life in older outpatients living alone in the community in Italy. Health & Soc. Care Community 20 (1), 32–41. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2524.2011.01011.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Blanchard, F., Tracy, E., Smith, J., Chattopadhyay, S., Wang, Y., Held, W. A., et al. (2003). DNA methylation controls the responsiveness of hepatoma cells to leukemia inhibitory factor. Hepatology 38 (6), 1516–1528. doi:10.1016/j.hep.2003.09.029

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Breaz, A. M. (2019). Depression at the third age. Rev. De. Cercet. Si Interv. Sociala 65, 36–50. doi:10.33788/rcis.65.3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Byeon, H. (2021a). Developing a nomogram for predicting the depression of senior citizens living alone while focusing on perceived social support. World J. Psychiatry 11 (12), 1314–1327. doi:10.5498/wjp.v11.i12.1314

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Byeon, H. (2021b). Exploring factors for predicting anxiety disorders of the elderly living alone in South Korea using interpretable machine learning: a population-based study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18 (14), 7625. doi:10.3390/ijerph18147625

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cederbom, S., Wagert, P. v.H., Soderlund, A., and Soderback, M. (2014). The importance of a daily rhythm in a supportive environment promoting ability in activities in everyday life among older women living alone with chronic pain. Disabil. Rehabilitation 36 (24), 2050–2058. doi:10.3109/09638288.2014.887795

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cermakova, P., Nelson, M., Secnik, J., Garcia-Ptacek, S., Johnell, K., Fastbom, J., et al. (2017). Living alone with Alzheimer's disease: data from SveDem, the Swedish dementia registry. J. Alzheimers Dis. 58 (4), 1265–1272. doi:10.3233/JAD-170102

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Charlton, K. E. (1999). Elderly men living alone: are they at high nutritional risk? J. Nutr. health & aging 3 (1), 42–47.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Charpentier, M., and Kirouac, L. (2022). Experiences of loneliness among older people living alone. A qualitative study in Quebec (Canada). Ageing & Soc. 42 (12), 2832–2853. doi:10.1017/s0144686x21000349

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Choi, J., Lee, S., Kim, S., Kim, D., and Kim, H. (2022). Depressed mood prediction of elderly people with a wearable band. Sensors 22 (11), 4174. doi:10.3390/s22114174

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Daniele, K., Marcucci, M., Cattaneo, C., Borghese, N. A., and Zannini, L. (2019). How prefrail older people living alone perceive information and communications technology and what they would ask a robot for: qualitative study. J. Med. Internet Res. 21 (8), e13228. doi:10.2196/13228

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Frazer, S. M., Oyebode, J. R., and Cleary, A. (2012). How older women who live alone with dementia make sense of their experiences: an interpretative phenomenological analysis. Dementia-International J. Soc. Res. Pract. 11 (5), 677–693. doi:10.1177/1471301211419018

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Guggenheim, K., and Margulec, I. (1965). Factors in the nutrition of elderly people living alone or as couples and receiving community assistance. J. Am. Geriatrics Soc. 13, 561–568. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.1965.tb00610.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hassan, W., and Duarte, A. E. (2024). Bibliometric analysis: a few suggestions. Curr. Probl. Cardiol. 49 (8), 102640. doi:10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2024.102640

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Henning-Smith, C. E., Gonzales, G., and Shippee, T. P. (2016). Barriers to timely medical care for older adults by disability status and household composition. J. Disabil. Policy Stud. 27 (2), 116–127. doi:10.1177/1044207316637547

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hong, Y. K., Wang, Z. Y., and Cho, J. Y. (2022). Global research trends on smart homes for older adults: bibliometric and scientometric analyses. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 19 (22), 14821. doi:10.3390/ijerph192214821

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hou, B., and Zhang, H. (2023). Latent profile analysis of depression among older adults living alone in China. J. Affect. Disord. 325, 378–385. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2022.12.154

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hsieh, Y. M., Sung, T. S., and Wan, K. S. (2010). A survey of nutrition and health status of solitary and non-solitary elders in Taiwan. J. Nutr. Health & Aging 14 (1), 11–14. doi:10.1007/s12603-010-0003-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hudson, J., Ungar, R., Albright, L., Tkatch, R., Schaeffer, J., and Wicker, E. R. (2020). Robotic pet use among community-dwelling older adults. J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 75 (9), 2018–2028. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbaa119

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huh, J.-H. (2018). An efficient solitary senior citizens care algorithm and application: considering emotional care for big data collection. Processes 6 (12), 244. doi:10.3390/pr6120244

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jin, L. H., and Son, S. A. (2018a). Psychological and physical effects of 10 Weeks urban forest therapy program on dementia prevention in low-income elderly living alone. J. People, Plants, Environ. 21 (6), 557–564. doi:10.11628/ksppe.2018.21.6.557

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jin, L. H., and Son, S. A. (2018b). Qualitative assessment of experience on urban forest therapy program for preventing dementia of the elderly living alone in low-income class. J. People, Plants, Environ. 21 (6), 565–574. doi:10.11628/ksppe.2018.21.6.565

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Khraief, C., Benzarti, F., and Amiri, H. (2020). Elderly fall detection based on multi-stream deep convolutional networks. Multimedia Tools Appl. 79 (27-28), 19537–19560. doi:10.1007/s11042-020-08812-x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kil, T. Y., Ryu, H. S., and Yamauchi, N. (2018). The effect of integrated play therapy on self-expression and depression in elderly women living alone in rural areas. J. Fac. Agric. Kyushu Univ. 63 (2), 457–467. doi:10.5109/1955669

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, J. I., Sun-Ae, K., Park, K., 김현주, 김선경, and 전영숙, (2018). The converge effects of the BeHaS exercise program on health status, depression and suicidal ideation in female elderly who live alone in community. J. Korea Convergence Soc. 9 (3), 111–119. doi:10.15207/jkcs.2018.9.3.111

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kleinberg, J. (2002). “Bursty and hierarchical structure in streams,” in Proceedings of the eighth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, 91–101.

Google Scholar

Kong, S., and So, W.-Y. (2017). Gender differences in body composition, physical activity level, physical fitness, and bone mineral density among elderly individuals living alone compared to those living with their spouses. J. Mens Health 13 (2), E60–E67. doi:10.22374/1875-6859.13.2.8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Koo, J. H., Son, N., and Yoo, K. B. (2021). Relationship between the living-alone period and depressive symptoms among the elderly. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 94, 104341. doi:10.1016/j.archger.2021.104341

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Koukouli, S., Vlachonikolis, I. G., and Philalithis, A. (2002). Socio-demographic factors and self-reported functional status: the significance of social support. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2 (1), 20. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-2-20

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lee, J., Lee, A. Y., and Daejeon Metropolitan Dementia, C. (2020). Home-visiting cognitive intervention for the community-dwelling elderly living alone. Dementia neurocognitive Disord. 19 (2), 65–73. doi:10.12779/dnd.2020.19.2.65

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lee, M., and Kim, K. (2014). Prevalence and risk factors for self-neglect among older adults living alone in South Korea. Int. J. Aging & Hum. Dev. 78 (2), 115–131. doi:10.2190/AG.78.2.b

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Y., Wang, W., Zhu, L., Yang, L., Wu, H., Zhang, X., et al. (2023). Pet ownership, living alone, and cognitive decline among adults 50 Years and older. JAMA Netw. Open 6 (12), e2349241. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.49241

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lin, P.-C., and Wang, H.-H. (2011). Factors associated with depressive symptoms among older adults living alone: an analysis of sex difference. Aging & Ment. Health 15 (8), 1038–1044. doi:10.1080/13607863.2011.583623

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Luperto, M., Monroy, J., Moreno, F.-A., Lunardini, F., Renoux, J., Krpic, A., et al. (2023). Seeking at-home long-term autonomy of assistive mobile robots through the integration with an IoT-based monitoring system. Robotics Aut. Syst. 161, 104346. doi:10.1016/j.robot.2022.104346

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Marziali, R. A., Franceschetti, C., Dinculescu, A., Nistorescu, A., Kristaly, D. M., Oi, A. A. M., et al. (2024). Reducing loneliness and social isolation of older adults through voice assistants: literature review and bibliometric analysis. J. Med. Internet Res. 26, e50534. doi:10.2196/50534

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

McHugh, J., Lee, O., Aspell, N., Lawlor, B. A., and Brennan, S. (2015). A shared mealtime approach to improving social and nutritional functioning among older adults living alone: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res. Protoc. 4 (2), e43. doi:10.2196/resprot.4050

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ninkov, A., Frank, J. R., and Maggio, L. A. (2022). Bibliometrics: methods for studying academic publishing. Perspect. Med. Educ. 11 (3), 173–176. doi:10.1007/s40037-021-00695-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

O'Brien, K., Liggett, A., Ramirez-Zohfeld, V., Sunkara, P., and Lindquist, L. A. (2020). Voice-controlled intelligent personal assistants to support aging in place. J. Am. Geriatrics Soc. 68 (1), 176–179. doi:10.1111/jgs.16217

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Oulie, H. E. (1988). Scurvy. A reminder. Tidsskrift den Norske laegeforening tidsskrift praktisk Med. N. Y. raekke 108 (19-21), 1488–1489.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Park, S., Jeong, K., and Lee, S. (2023a). A study on the longitudinal relationship between changes in depression and cognitive function among older adults living alone. Healthcare 11 (20), 2712. doi:10.3390/healthcare11202712

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Park, S., and Kim, B. (2022). The impact of everyday AI-based smart speaker use on the well-being of older adults living alone. Technol. Soc. 71, 102133. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102133

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Park, S., Lee, S., and Jeong, K.-H. (2023b). Predictors of variation in the cognitive function trajectories among older adults living alone: a growth mixture modeling approach. Healthcare 11 (20), 2750. doi:10.3390/healthcare11202750

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Park, Y., Kim, E. J., Park, S., and Lee, M. (2025). Digital health intervention effect on older adults with chronic diseases living alone: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J. Med. Internet Res. 27, e63168. doi:10.2196/63168

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Parlar Kilic, S., Karadag, G., Kocak, H. S., and Korhan, E. A. (2014). Investigation of the old age perceptions with the loneliness and depression levels of the elderly living at home. Turkish J. Geriatrics-Turk Geriatri Dergisi 17 (1), 70–76.

Google Scholar

Pequignot, G., Vinit, F., Maujol, L., and Sommier, T. (1967). Survey of the nutrition and state of health of 98 elderly people living alone. Bull. de l'Institut Natl. de la sante de la recherche medicale 22 (3), 607–653.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Rajasekaran, M. P., Radhakrishnan, S., and Subbaraj, P. (2009). Elderly patient monitoring system using a wireless sensor network. Telemed. J. E Health 15 (1), 73–79. doi:10.1089/tmj.2008.0056

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ramic, E., Pranjic, N., Batic-Mujanovic, O., Karic, E., Alibasic, E., and Alic, A. (2011). The effect of loneliness on malnutrition in elderly population. Med. Arh. 65 (2), 92–95.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Renwick, K. A., Sanmartin, C., Dasgupta, K., Berrang-Ford, L., and Ross, N. (2020). The influence of low social support and living alone on premature mortality among aging Canadians. Can. J. Public Health 111 (4), 594–605. doi:10.17269/s41997-020-00310-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rodwell, J. (2022). Health need factors are the key drivers of hospitalization among the elderly living alone: an analysis of longitudinal data. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 19 (22), 15315. doi:10.3390/ijerph192215315

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rolls, L., Seymour, J. E., Froggatt, K. A., and Hanratty, B. (2011). Older people living alone at the end of life in the UK: research and policy challenges. Palliat. Med. 25 (6), 650–657. doi:10.1177/0269216310373165

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stanley, I. H., Conwell, Y., Bowen, C., and Van Orden, K. A. (2014). Pet ownership may attenuate loneliness among older adult primary care patients who live alone. Aging Ment. Health 18 (3), 394–399. doi:10.1080/13607863.2013.837147

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sun, W., Watanabe, M., Tanimoto, Y., Shibutani, T., Kono, R., Saito, M., et al. (2007). Factors associated with good self-rated health of non-disabled elderly living alone in Japan: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 7, 297. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-7-297

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tamminen, N., Kettunen, T., Martelin, T., Reinikainen, J., and Solin, P. (2019). Living alone and positive mental health: a systematic review. Syst. Rev. 8 (1), 134. doi:10.1186/s13643-019-1057-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tan, M. Y., Mo, C. Y., and Zhao, Q. (2023). Research hotspots and trends on acupuncture therapy on vomiting from 1990 to 2022: a bibliometric analysis. Complement. Ther. Med. 76, 102962. doi:10.1016/j.ctim.2023.102962

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tan, Z. S., Zhao, Y. C., Jin, Z. M., Li, G. Y., Xu, L., Li, W. L., et al. (2021). The relationship between muscular atrophy/sarcopenia and cardiovascular diseases in the elderly: a bibliometrics study. Ann. Palliat. Med. 10 (8), 9136–9148. doi:10.21037/apm-21-2144

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tomstad, S. T., Soderhamn, U., Espnes, G. A., and Soderhamn, O. (2012). Living alone, receiving help, helplessness, and inactivity are strongly related to risk of undernutrition among older home-dwelling people. Int. J. general Med. 5, 231–240. doi:10.2147/ijgm.S28507

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ujager, F. S., Mahmood, A., and Khatoon, S. (2019). Wellness determination of the elderly using spatio-temporal correlation analysis of daily activities. J. Ambient Intell. Smart Environ. 11 (6), 515–526. doi:10.3233/ais-190538

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

van Gelder, B. M., Tijhuis, M., Kalmijn, S., Giampaoli, S., Nissinen, A., and Kromhout, D. (2006). Marital status and living situation during a 5-year period are associated with a subsequent 10-year cognitive decline in older men: the FINE Study. J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 61 (4), P213–P219. doi:10.1093/geronb/61.4.p213

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, B., Jiang, X., Dong, Z., and Li, J. (2022). Behavioral parameter field for human abnormal behavior recognition in low-resolution thermal imaging video. Appl. Sciences-Basel 12 (1), 402. doi:10.3390/app12010402

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, N., Di Nuovo, A., Cangelosi, A., and Jones, R. (2019). Temporal patterns in multi-modal social interaction between elderly users and service robot. Interact. Stud. 20 (1), 4–24. doi:10.1075/is.18042.wan

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, B., Xiong, G., Zhang, P., and Ma, X. (2024). Effects of tai chi, ba duan jin, and walking on the mental health status of urban older people living alone: the mediating role of social participation and the moderating role of the exercise environment. Front. Public Health 12. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1294019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yamagami, M., Noyama, O., and Nishimura, I. (1998). Vitamin A, B1 and C status of elderly living alone. [Nihon koshu eisei zasshi] Jpn. J. public health 45 (3), 213–224.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Yan, C., Johnson, K., and Jones, V. K. (2024). The impact of interaction time and verbal engagement with personal voice assistants on alleviating loneliness among older adults: an exploratory study. Int. J. Environ. Res. public health 21 (1), 100. doi:10.3390/ijerph21010100

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, J., Huang, J., Yang, X., Li, S., Wu, X., and Ma, X. (2023). The association of living alone and social isolation with sarcopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ageing Res. Rev. 91, 102043. doi:10.1016/j.arr.2023.102043

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, Y., Yang, H., Liu, Z., Yuan, Y., and Guan, X. (2022). Fall detection system based on infrared array sensor and multi-dimensional feature fusion. Measurement 192, 110870. doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2022.110870

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yeh, S. C. J., and Lo, S. K. (2004). Living alone, social support, and feeling lonely among the elderly. Soc. Behav. Personality 32 (2), 129–138. doi:10.2224/sbp.2004.32.2.129

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

You, K. S., and Lee, H. (2006). The physical, mental, and emotional health of older people who are living alone or with relatives. Arch. Psychiatr. Nurs. 20 (4), 193–201. doi:10.1016/j.apnu.2005.12.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, J. W., Weng, Y. Q., Qiao, M. T., Chen, W. Y., and Zhang, L. J. (2023). Research status, hotspots and trends on oral care research in the elderly published from 2002 to 2022: a bibliometric analysis - a review article. Nurs. Open 10 (8), 4907–4918. doi:10.1002/nop2.1798

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar