Abstract
Introduction:
Aging is a global phenomenon that has generated great concerns and challenges in terms of public health and medical care, associated with a lower quality of life. The objective to study was to compare the functional fitness of older adults in a region of Chile with other countries, and to propose normative values according to age range and sex.
Methods:
A descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out in older adults of the central-south region of Chile. The sample selection was non-probabilistic. A total of 787 older adults (180 males and 607 females) with an age range of 60ā85Ā years were investigated. The sample represents a group of physically active older adults. Weight and height were assessed. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated. The four physical tests evaluated were: 30-s push-up (reps), 30-s standing chair (rep), 8-ft up-and-go (sec), 2-min step test (rep) and 6-min walk (m). Percentiles were calculated for p10, p25, p50, p75 and p90), through the LMS method (L: Lambda; skewness), M: Mu; median and S: Sigma; coefficient of variation).
Results:
Discrepancies in BMI were observed between countries (in males from ā¼4.3 to 7.0Ā kg/m2 and in females from ā¼6.7ā7.5 kg/m2). In the 30-s push-up test) there were variations from ā¼3 to six repetitions in both sexes. In the 8-ft up-and-go test, discrepancies ranged from ā¼1.1 to 4.4Ā s. In the aerobic 2-min step test, discrepancies ranged in both sexes from ā¼21 to 41 repetitions. In the 6-min walk test, the variations between studies ranged from ā¼150 to 245Ā m in both sexes. In the 30-s standing chair test, performance in both sexes was relatively homogeneous, varying from ā¼1 to 2 repetitions. Percentiles by age range and sex were developed for BMI and the five functional fitness tests.
Conclusion:
This study demonstrated that there were discrepancies in BMI and functional fitness performance of older adults between countries in various geographic regions of the world. In addition, the proposed percentiles are an important tool to track individual changes and can be used to evaluate and plan intervention programs in older adults in Chile.
1 Introduction
The aging of the worldās population is a global phenomenon that poses significant challenges in terms of public health and medical care. It is considered the main contributor to a wide spectrum of chronic disorders, all of which are associated with a lower quality of life in older adults (OAs) ().
In general, aging has generated major concerns worldwide, particularly in developing countries, where the increasing number and percentage of OAs has become a pressing issue ().
Indeed, it is associated with impaired physical function that affects vital processes crucial for functional independence, social interaction and quality of life (). For this reason in recent years, several European studies have emphasized cross-sectional research on frailty syndrome (), biliological markers of health (). As well as longitudinal research on health trajectories (), social support, social participation and quality of life of European older adults ().
These advances have generated increasing attention to the assessment and promotion of the functional health of this demographic group. Consolidating as a priority in public policies and research on healthy aging in various regions of the world.
Thus, since 1999, when the Senior Fitness test (SFT) was first published for the American population (), few studies have been interested in developing percentiles to assess functional fitness in OAs from various regions of the world.
For example, in Spain (), Portugal (), Poland () and China [; ; ) reference values have been proposed using SFT tests. Normative SFT data allows for the assessment of individual performance, which helps to identify functional weaknesses. It serves to monitor and evaluate the motor proficiency of OAs (; ). In addition, they are relevant not only to identify fitness levels, but also to promote public policies ().
As far as is known, as far as is known, in Chile there are no reference values to assess functional fitness in OAs of both sexes. Except for some studies that address some physical tests such as aerobic fitness through the 6Ā min walk test in adults of both sexes aged 50ā84Ā years (), or the proposed SFT in adult women aged 60ā85Ā years ().
In fact, these studies provide limited data on the assessment of functional fitness in OAs for the Chilean population. Thus, developing a study that encompasses both sexes, a wide age range, and evaluates morphological, muscular, balance, agility, flexibility, and aerobic endurance components would be extremely valuable to better understand the needs of this population and design effective health interventions.
Such a study would not only provide a more complete picture of the functional fitness and wellbeing of OAs in Chile, but would also allow the control of specific interventions tailored to the needs of this population, thus promoting healthy and active aging in the country.
In general, Chile in recent decades has increased life expectancy at birth from 72.6 to 81.2Ā years in 1990ā2023 (; ). At present, the country is experiencing a phase of accelerated aging where the OAs in the country was 3.4% in 1950, reaching 12.2% in 2020, and projected to reach 30% in 2065 ().
Consequently, Chile is a country with a marked process of nutritional and demographic transition, with marked sociocultural and regional differences (). Therefore, the international reference values that evaluate functional fitness could hardly be adapted to the Chilean population. For functional fitness levels in OAs are the result of dynamic socioeconomic changes. As well as diverse living conditions, sociocultural, ethnic, genetic and geographical aspects ().
Therefore, this study was proposed as an initial objective, to compare the functional fitness of OAs from a region of Chile with other countries, and to propose normative values according to age range and sex.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Type of study and sample
A descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out in OAs in the central-southern region of Chile. The sample selection was non-probabilistic (accidental). A total of 787 OAs (180 males and 607 females) with an age range of 60ā85Ā years were investigated. The sample represents a group of physically active older adults.
All the volunteers belonged to 04 cities (Curicó, Linares, Talca, Chillan) in the central-southern region of Chile. They belonged to senior citizens' clubs in the municipalities of the Maule region (Chile) and attended physical activity programs twice a week with an approximate duration of 60 min/day. To be eligible, they had to be at least 60 years old and a maximum of 85 years old at the date of the evaluation. In addition, they had to be self-sufficient (walk independently), read and understand the indications of the anthropometric and physical tests to be applied. The OAs who did not complete all the tests and had some visual and hearing impairments that prevented the completion of the tests were excluded.
All volunteers were informed of the objectives of the study and gave informed consent to participate in the research project. The study was conducted in accordance with the indications of the Ethics Committee of the Universidad Católica del Maule (UCM-93/2022), and the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki for human subjects.
2.2 Techniques and instruments
Data collection was conducted from June 2022 to December 2023. This entire procedure was carried out at the facilities of the OAs clubs. The order of the evaluations was: initially anthropometry (weight and height), followed by the functional fitness tests: 30-s push-up (reps), 30-s standing chair (rep), 8-ft up-and-go (sec), 2-min step test (rep) and 6-min walk (m).
To ensure the reliability of the physical test evaluations, 10% of the studied sample (n = 80 subjects) was evaluated twice. All tests were evaluated with an interval of 7 days between tests. The relative technical error of measurement (TEM%) ranged in the tests from 0.5% to 1.2%.
2.3 Anthropometry
Anthropometric measurements were evaluated according to the recommendations of Ross, Marfell-Jones (). These measurements were performed by 2 experienced anthropometrists. Body weight (kg) was assessed using a digital scale (SECA, Hamburg) with an accuracy of 0.1Ā kg. Standing height (cm) was measured using a stadiometer (SECA, Hamburg) with an accuracy of 0.1Ā cm. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated using the formula [BMI = weight (kg)/height (m)2].
2.4 Functional fitness tests
Five SFT physical tests were applied according to the suggestions described by . These tests were:
30-s push-up (repetitions): measures arm strength and endurance by counting the number of push-ups performed correctly in 30Ā s. This requires females to repeatedly lift a weight of 2.27Ā kg (5 lb) and males a weight of 3.63Ā kg (8 lb) for 30Ā s.
30-s standing chair (rep): Reflects lower body strength. Requires individuals to stand and sit in a chair for 30Ā s. The number of repetitions is recorded. The test was administered using a wooden chair without arms, with a seat height of 43.2Ā cm (17 inches). The chair had a rubber band attached to the end of the legs to prevent slipping. It was placed against a wall to prevent it from moving during the test ().
8-ft up-and-go (sec): Assesses agility and dynamic balance. The test is started by sitting in a chair and must travel 2.45 m and reach the starting position. Time is recorded in seconds.
2-min step test (rep): Evaluates aerobic endurance. The maximum number of knee lifts performed in 2Ā min is counted. During the stationary gait, a midpoint between the patella and the anterior superior iliac spine must be produced. The number of repetitions of the right knee is counted.
6-min walk (m): Its purpose is to assess aerobic endurance by walking in meters. If it is not possible to perform the 6-min walk test, this test can be substituted by the 2-min walk test.
For comparison with other studies, research carried out in five countries of the world Spain (), Portugal (), Poland (), USA () and China (Nanjing-region) () and China (Suzhuo-Region) () were used.
2.5 Statistics
The distribution of the data of the older adults was verified using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. The descriptive statistical parameters were then calculated (arithmetic mean, standard deviation, range, confidence interval CI). Significant differences between both sexes were verified by means of the t-test for independent samples. Differences between the values of anthropometric and physical characteristics according to age groups were determined by one-way ANOVA and Tukeyās test of specificity. In all cases, a p < 0.05 was considered significant. The significance adopted was 0.05. Calculations were performed in Excel spreadsheets and SPSS 16.0. Percentiles (P10, P25, P50, P75, P90) were developed using the LMS method (L: Lambda; skewness, M: Mu; median and S: Sigma; coefficient of variation). Discrepancies between the study and international investigations were compared using the 100 log fraction (reference percentile/calculated percentile).
3 Results
Table 1 presents the statistical analysis of the anthropometric characteristics and functional performance of older adults in a region of Chile. It was stratified by gender and age groups of five categories (60-64Ā years, 65-69Ā years, 70-74Ā years, 75-79Ā years and 80ā85Ā years). The results have shown significant differences between age groups in each gender. In males, more pronounced changes in weight and BMI are evident between extreme age groups (from 60 to 65 years to 80ā85Ā years). For example, in weight, a decrease in weight from 77.7Ā kg (at 60ā64Ā years of age) to 62.1Ā kg (at 80ā85Ā years of age) was observed. In height, values decrease slightly with age, from 154.7 cm to 151.7Ā cm (p < 0.05). Consequently in BMI, the values decrease from 32.4Ā kg/m2 to 27.0Ā kg/m2, indicating a significant reduction (p < 0.05). In the functional tests, it is observed that, of the five tests, significant deterioration is observed in four as age advances (p < 0.05). With the exception of the 2-min step test, in which it slightly decreases despite not being significant (p > 0.05).
TABLE 1
| Variables | 60ā64 years | 65-69 y | 70-74 y | 75-79 y | 80-85 y | Differences | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X | SD | X | SD | X | SD | X | SD | X | SD | a-b | a-c | a-d | a-e | b-c | b-d | b-e | c-d | c-e | d-e | |
| Males | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Anthropometry | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Weight (kg) | 77.7 | 11.9 | 74.2 | 12.2 | 73 | 13.6 | 71 | 13.5 | 62.1 | 11.9 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
| Height (cm) | 154.7 | 7.2 | 157.3 | 9.3 | 155.5 | 8.8 | 155.6 | 8.8 | 151.7 | 5.3 | No | No | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | No | No | Yes |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 32.4 | 4 | 30.1 | 4.7 | 30.3 | 5.9 | 29.3 | 5.1 | 27 | 4.8 | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
| Functional fitness | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 30-s push-ups (reps) | 20.6 | 4.7 | 22.1 | 6.7 | 20.6 | 6.7 | 18.2 | 7.7 | 15.5 | 3.9 | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
| 30-s standing chair (rep) | 15.9 | 4.1 | 17.5 | 5.6 | 15.4 | 4.3 | 13.6 | 3.6 | 12.4 | 3.4 | No | No | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No |
| 8-ft up-and-go (sec) | 7 | 2.8 | 6.5 | 2.1 | 6.8 | 2.4 | 10.2 | 7.3 | 8.9 | 3.4 | No | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| 2-min step test (rep) | 93.3 | 38 | 111.7 | 31.6 | 136.5 | 180.7 | 95.2 | 22.4 | 95.7 | 24.4 | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| 6-min walk (m) | 460.5 | 83.5 | 483.5 | 79.6 | 453.5 | 95.5 | 421.9 | 81.5 | 380.8 | 136.6 | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Females | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Anthropometry | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Weight (kg) | 72.6 | 11.3 | 72.9 | 14.4 | 70.8 | 12.6 | 69.9 | 13.2 | 65.4 | 13.3 | No | No | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
| Height (cm) | 156.6 | 8.8 | 155.9 | 8.3 | 154.2 | 7.3 | 154 | 7.9 | 152 | 8.5 | No | No | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | No |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 29.7 | 4.6 | 29.9 | 5.3 | 29.8 | 5.1 | 29.4 | 4.8 | 28.2 | 4.3 | No | No | No | NO | No | No | No | No | No | No |
| Functional fitness | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 30-s push-ups (reps) | 22.6 | 6.3 | 20.9 | 5.9 | 19.2 | 5.9 | 17 | 4.7 | 16.3 | 5 | No | No | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No |
| 30-s standing chair (rep) | 17.5 | 5.4 | 16.7 | 5.8 | 14.6 | 4.5 | 13.9 | 4.3 | 12.9 | 3.2 | No | No | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | No | No | No |
| 8-ft up-and-go (sec) | 6.1 | 1.9 | 8.1 | 8.2 | 7.2 | 2.1 | 8.4 | 4.1 | 8.6 | 2.8 | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | No |
| 2-min step test (rep) | 104.3 | 29.6 | 111.9 | 31.7 | 103.1 | 34.5 | 114.7 | 133.4 | 90.3 | 23.4 | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| 6-min walk (m) | 505.9 | 89.4 | 468.3 | 109.3 | 436.2 | 92.7 | 421.3 | 113.2 | 360.3 | 110.5 | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
Anthropometric and physical characteristics of the sample studied.
Note: X: mean, SD: standard deviation, BMI: body mass index, Yes: (p < 0.05), No: (p > 0.05), a: 60-64 years, b: 65-69 years, c: 70-74 years, d: 75-79 years, e: 80-85 years.
Table 2 shows the distribution of percentiles (p10, p15, p50, p85 and p90) for both sexes and determined by the LMS method. The BMI and the five tests allow determining the level of functional fitness of older adults in relation to their age group and sex. These categories can help to classify according to performance in each of the tests. As age advances, BMI and performance on all physical tests decreases.
TABLE 2
| Age | Males | Females | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | L | M | S | P10 | P15 | P50 | P85 | P90 | n | L | M | S | P10 | P15 | P50 | P85 | P90 | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | ||||||||||||||||||
| 60 to 64 | 25 | ā0.1 | 32.1 | 0.1 | 27.5 | 28.3 | 32.1 | 36.5 | 37.7 | 93 | ā0.5 | 29.2 | 0.2 | 24.1 | 25,0 | 29.2 | 34.7 | 36.2 |
| 65 to 69 | 50 | ā0.9 | 29.5 | 0.1 | 24.8 | 25.6 | 29.5 | 34.7 | 36.2 | 163 | ā0.2 | 29.4 | 0.2 | 23.8 | 24.7 | 29.4 | 35.1 | 36.6 |
| 70 to 74 | 45 | ā1,0 | 29.2 | 0.2 | 24.1 | 25,0 | 29.2 | 35.2 | 37,0 | 164 | ā0.2 | 29.3 | 0.2 | 23.8 | 24.7 | 29.3 | 35,0 | 36.5 |
| 75 to 79 | 35 | ā0.4 | 28.8 | 0.2 | 23.5 | 24.4 | 28.8 | 34.4 | 36,0 | 123 | 0,0 | 29.1 | 0.2 | 23.8 | 24.7 | 29.1 | 34.2 | 35.6 |
| 80 to 85 | 25 | 0.5 | 27.5 | 0.2 | 22.2 | 23.1 | 27.5 | 32.3 | 33.5 | 64 | 0.6 | 28.4 | 0.1 | 23.4 | 24.3 | 28.4 | 32.7 | 33.8 |
| 30-s push-up (reps) | ||||||||||||||||||
| 60 to 64 | 25 | 0.6 | 20.8 | 0.3 | 14,0 | 15,0 | 21,0 | 27,0 | 29,0 | 93 | 0.4 | 21.6 | 0.3 | 14,0 | 15,0 | 22,0 | 29,0 | 31,0 |
| 65 to 69 | 50 | 0.6 | 21.2 | 0.3 | 14,0 | 15,0 | 21,0 | 28,0 | 30,0 | 163 | 0.5 | 20.6 | 0.3 | 13,0 | 15,0 | 21,0 | 27,0 | 29,0 |
| 70 to 74 | 45 | 0.7 | 20.1 | 0.3 | 12,0 | 14,0 | 20,0 | 27,0 | 29,0 | 164 | 0.7 | 18.9 | 0.3 | 12,0 | 14,0 | 19,0 | 25,0 | 26,0 |
| 75 to 79 | 35 | 0.8 | 17.9 | 0.3 | 11,0 | 12,0 | 18,0 | 24,0 | 26,0 | 123 | 0.8 | 17.1 | 0.3 | 11,0 | 12,0 | 17,0 | 22,0 | 24,0 |
| 80 to 85 | 25 | 1.1 | 16.4 | 0.3 | 10,0 | 11,0 | 16,0 | 22,0 | 23,0 | 64 | 1.1 | 16.5 | 0.3 | 10,0 | 12,0 | 17,0 | 21,0 | 23,0 |
| 8-ft up-and-go (sec) | ||||||||||||||||||
| 60 to 64 | 25 | ā2,0 | 5.3 | 0.2 | 4.18 | 4.33 | 5.26 | 7.23 | 8.14 | 93 | ā1.4 | 5.7 | 0.3 | 4.36 | 4.56 | 5.72 | 8.01 | 8.96 |
| 65 to 69 | 50 | ā1.7 | 5.4 | 0.3 | 4.16 | 4.34 | 5.4 | 7.7 | 8.77 | 163 | ā1.3 | 6.2 | 0.3 | 4.63 | 4.86 | 6.16 | 8.74 | 9.77 |
| 70 to 74 | 45 | ā1.5 | 5.9 | 0.3 | 4.45 | 4.66 | 5.93 | 8.68 | 9.93 | 164 | ā1.1 | 6.7 | 0.3 | 4.98 | 5.24 | 6.74 | 9.55 | 10.62 |
| 75 to 79 | 35 | ā1.2 | 7,0 | 0.3 | 5.07 | 5.35 | 6.98 | 10.32 | 11.71 | 123 | ā0.9 | 7.4 | 0.3 | 5.34 | 5.64 | 7.37 | 10.42 | 11.51 |
| 80 to 85 | 25 | ā0.6 | 7.8 | 0.3 | 5.4 | 5.76 | 7.8 | 11.29 | 12.49 | 64 | ā0.6 | 8.1 | 0.3 | 5.73 | 6.09 | 8.06 | 11.34 | 12.44 |
| 30-s standing chair (rep) | ||||||||||||||||||
| 60 to 64 | 25 | 0,0 | 15.9 | 0.3 | 11,0 | 12,0 | 16,0 | 21,0 | 23,0 | 93 | 0.1 | 16.6 | 0.3 | 11,0 | 12,0 | 17,0 | 23,0 | 25,0 |
| 65 to 69 | 50 | ā0.1 | 16.1 | 0.3 | 11,0 | 12,0 | 16,0 | 22,0 | 23,0 | 163 | 0.1 | 15.6 | 0.3 | 10,0 | 11,0 | 16,0 | 22,0 | 23,0 |
| 70 to 74 | 45 | 0,0 | 14.9 | 0.3 | 11,0 | 11,0 | 15,0 | 20,0 | 21,0 | 164 | 0.1 | 14.3 | 0.3 | 10,0 | 10,0 | 14,0 | 20,0 | 21,0 |
| 75 to 79 | 35 | 0.2 | 13.3 | 0.3 | 9,0 | 10,0 | 13,0 | 18,0 | 19,0 | 123 | 0.3 | 13.4 | 0.3 | 9,0 | 10,0 | 13,0 | 18,0 | 19,0 |
| 80 to 85 | 25 | 0.5 | 12.1 | 0.3 | 8,0 | 9,0 | 12,0 | 16,0 | 17,0 | 64 | 0.5 | 12.6 | 0.3 | 8,0 | 9,0 | 13,0 | 17,0 | 18,0 |
| 2-min step test (rep) | ||||||||||||||||||
| 60 to 64 | 25 | 1.5 | 104.9 | 0.3 | 64 | 73 | 105 | 133 | 139 | 93 | 1.2 | 109.6 | 0.3 | 68 | 76 | 110 | 141 | 149 |
| 65 to 69 | 50 | 1.2 | 109.7 | 0.3 | 72 | 80 | 110 | 139 | 145 | 163 | 1.2 | 110.1 | 0.3 | 64 | 73 | 110 | 144 | 152 |
| 70 to 74 | 45 | 1.0 | 104.5 | 0.2 | 73 | 79 | 105 | 131 | 137 | 164 | 1.2 | 105.5 | 0.3 | 60 | 69 | 105 | 140 | 147 |
| 75 to 79 | 35 | 0.9 | 97 | 0.2 | 68 | 74 | 97 | 121 | 127 | 123 | 0.9 | 98.2 | 0.3 | 59 | 66 | 98 | 132 | 140 |
| 80 to 85 | 25 | 0.9 | 89.6 | 0.2 | 62 | 67 | 90 | 113 | 118 | 64 | 0.6 | 90.9 | 0.3 | 58 | 63 | 91 | 123 | 131 |
| 6-min walk (m) | ||||||||||||||||||
| 60 to 64 | 25 | 3.5 | 580.1 | 0.1 | 442.2 | 477 | 580 | 651 | 666 | 93 | 1.4 | 497 | 0.2 | 388 | 410 | 497 | 579 | 597 |
| 65 to 69 | 50 | 2.1 | 535.7 | 0.2 | 398.5 | 429 | 536 | 623 | 642 | 163 | 1.8 | 479.5 | 0.2 | 359 | 384 | 480 | 562 | 581 |
| 70 to 74 | 45 | 1.1 | 498.1 | 0.2 | 368.6 | 394 | 498 | 600 | 624 | 164 | 1.8 | 451.5 | 0.2 | 325 | 352 | 451 | 536 | 555 |
| 75 to 79 | 35 | 0.6 | 475.4 | 0.2 | 350.1 | 373 | 475 | 588 | 617 | 123 | 1.7 | 424.6 | 0.2 | 292 | 320 | 425 | 514 | 534 |
| 80 to 85 | 25 | 0.2 | 446.4 | 0.2 | 331.2 | 351 | 446 | 562 | 593 | 64 | 1.5 | 390.6 | 0.2 | 255 | 283 | 391 | 485 | 506 |
Percentiles distributed in p10, p15, p50, p85 and p90 to assess BMI and functional fitness by age group and sex.
Legend: L: lambda; skewness), M: mu; median and S: sigma; coefficient of variation.
Figure 1, shows the comparisons of the components of functional fitness from various countries of the world. These comparisons were made from the 50th percentile and in five age ranges (60-64 years, 65-69 years, 70-74 years, 75-79 years, 80-85 years). For example, in the first component (BMI), Chile and Spain have shown similar BMI values in both sexes and in all age ranges. The study conducted in China (Nanjing-region) by , showed the lowest BMI values (in both sexes) in relation to the other countries. The discrepancies observed in p50 in men ranged from ā¼4.3 to 7.0Ā kg/m2 and in women from ā¼6.7ā7.5 kg/m2.
FIGURE 1
In the second component (30-s push-up), malesn from Portugal showed better performance relative to the other countries (ā¼4-5 rep). Countries such as China, USA and Chile have shown relatively similar values in all age ranges. Values in this test reflect discrepancies from ā¼4 to 8 repetitions. While, in females, Chilean females showed a better performance in relation to the other countries (ā¼2ā3 repetitions). In general, women from the USA showed lower performance compared to the other countries. Performance variations in this test ranged from ā¼3 to six repetitions.
In the third component (8-ft up-and-go), men and women from China (Nanjing-region) (
In the fourth component (30-s standing chair), the results have shown that it was the only test that evidenced very few discrepancies in both sexes and in all age ranges. Performance in this test is relatively homogeneous, as it varied in males around ā¼1 repetition, while in females ā¼2 repetitions.
In the fifth component (2-min step test), the Chilean OAs (both sexes), showed better performance in this test in relation to the other countries [both studies from China (Nanjing-region (
The sixth component (6-min walk), results indicate that there was wide variation in performance on this test. For example, USA OAs (both sexes), evidenced better performance in this test compared to the other countries (Chile, Portugal, Spain and Poland). There were discrepancies in the p50 in the five age ranges and in both sexes. In males, distance variations ranged from ā¼155 to 245 m, while in females they ranged from ā¼150 to 185Ā m.
4 Discussion
The first objective of the study was to compare the functional fitness of older adults in one region of Chile with that of other countries.
The results of the study have shown that there were wide discrepancies in the components of functional fitness when compared between the 50th percentile (p50) with other international studies (BMI, 8-ft up-and-go, 2-min step test, 6-min walk). However, the only test that showed similar results between Chilean OAs and other countries was the 30-s standing chair test, where performance was relatively homogeneous in both sexes and in all age ranges, varying slightly in men and women.
We observed discrepancies between studies in BMI, these variations in men ranged from ā¼4.3 to 7.0Ā kg/m2 and in women from ā¼6.7ā7.5 kg/m2. In addition, all international studies and the Chilean study have shown a decrease in BMI with increasing age.
This decrease in BMI as age advances is basically due to the loss of muscle mass, bone and other soft tissues, rather than the loss of body fat (
In general, as the OAs in this study and international studies age, especially after age 60, a significant decrease in weight, height, and body mass index (BMI) is observed in each age group. Accompanied by a significant loss in functional test performance. This reflects a progressive deterioration in their functional fitness.
In fact, the
These observed changes in BMI in OAs, especially in the reduction of weight status with advancing age, tend to be at increased risk for worse health outcomes and mortality (
Its use is still common due to its simplicity and low cost. In addition to its importance in assessing and monitoring weight status using BMI, as it is the most widely used and accepted method in the clinical care setting, especially in older adults (
In relation to the functional fitness tests, discrepancies were observed in the 30-s push-up test), whose variations for both sexes and age ranges were from ā¼3 to six repetitions, similarly in the 8-ft up-and-go test, the discrepancies were for both sexes and ranged from ā¼1.1 to 4.4Ā s. Meanwhile, in the aerobic 2-min step test the discrepancies were wider in males (ā¼32ā41 repetitions) than in females (ā¼14ā21 repetitions), and in the 6-min walk test, the results indicate variations from ā¼150 to 245Ā m in both sexes. In the 30-s standing chair test, performance in both sexes was relatively homogeneous and across all age ranges, varying slightly in males by one repetition, while in females from ā¼1 to 2 repetitions, respectively.
Overall, these functional fitness tests evaluated in this study clearly reflected discrepancies with international studies (
In fact, the studies used as a reference for comparison with the regional sample of Chile have mostly employed samples selected by non-probabilistic methods (
We also verified that BMI and physical tests reflect a progressive deterioration with advancing age for both men and women. These findings have previously been described in previous studies (
In essence, several studies have shown that various structural and functional changes occur during aging, such as loss of walking ability, muscle strength, balance and flexibility (
Indeed, impaired functional fitness entails a number of physiological and biological changes that can affect a personās ability to perform daily activities independently and efficiently (
In general, progressive deterioration in functional fitness can lead to an increased risk of falls and other health problems, underscoring the importance of assessing and monitoring BMI and physical abilities in this age group. In fact, the findings of this study are consistent with previous research that has also documented these effects of aging as age advances.
Consequently, given the discrepancies in functional fitness among OAs from various geographic regions of the world, this study aimed, as a second objective, to propose normative values to assess the functional fitness of OAs from one region of Chile, according to age range and sex.
Normative values on functional fitness in general can allow the assessment of individual performance, which helps to identify functional weaknesses in risk-prone OAs (
The development of percentiles is a tool that helps to identify OAs, whose fitness level is below normal for their age and sex and below the recommended standards for independent functioning (
In general, this study was based on cut-off points that have been adopted by previous studies (
In fact, due to social, cultural and racial differences the use and generalization of normative data among various countries and geographic regions is not effective (
In that context, the normative values proposed here are a valuable and fundamental tool for the regional population of Chile, and can be used to track individual changes, can facilitate the understanding of the fitness status of OAs. It can also be used to monitor intervention programs and develop public policies. This implies that functional fitness assessments in OAs must consider a complex interaction between individual, social, environmental and health factors.
This study has some strengths and weaknesses, which are described below. For example, it is one of the first studies carried out in Chile in OAs of both sexes and shows comparisons with other regions of the world. The percentiles proposed here can help to better understand the health status and functional fitness of this regional population, as well as can serve in the design and control of physical exercise and rehabilitation programs adapted to the needs of the OAs and in the field of research, the percentiles developed can serve as a baseline for future comparisons of secular trend.
However, some weaknesses are also observed, these have to do with the selection of the non-probabilistic sample, since it is not possible to generalize the results to an entire country, limiting them to the central-southern region of Chile. The cross-sectional design used limits the cause and effect relationships; therefore, it is necessary for future studies to develop longitudinal research to establish and explain the causal relationships. Also, it is necessary to control some environmental and sociodemographic variables, which have to do with access to medical care, socioeconomic status, lifestyles.
In Chile, several future directions for functional fitness research are suggested, based on recent findings, such as the development of national norms, comparisons with samples of adults living in rural areas, as well as considering psychological, social and environmental factors in these evaluations.
In conclusion. These differences are probably due to contextual, socioeconomic, cultural and lifestyle factors. However, the 30-s sit-up-and-go test showed consistent results across different populations. This suggests that it may be less sensitive to contextual factors and therefore useful for international comparisons. Based on these results, specific percentiles were developed for Chilean older adults. This facilitates more accurate and contextualized assessments and can be used to evaluate and plan intervention programs.
Statements
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics statement
The studies involving humans were approved by Ethics Committee of the Universidad Católica del Maule (UCM-93/2022. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation in this study was provided by the participantsā legal guardians/next of kin.
Author contributions
MC-B: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Project administration, Supervision, Writing ā original draft, Writing ā review and editing. RV-E: Data curation, Investigation, Writing ā original draft. LC: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Writing ā original draft. JS-T: Formal Analysis, Software, Supervision, Writing ā original draft. CU-A: Data curation, Investigation, Writing ā original draft. FA-L: Data curation, Investigation, Writing ā original draft. JF-L: Formal Analysis, Methodology, Writing ā original draft. MR: Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing ā original draft. RG-C: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Supervision, Writing ā original draft, Writing ā review and editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This research was funded by Fondecyt Regular Project 1221708 (ANID, Chile).
Acknowledgments
We would like to express our gratitude to all the participating for their tremendous support.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Publisherās note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
AlbrechtB. M.StallingI.BammannK. (2021). Sex-and age-specific normative values for handgrip strength and components of the Senior Fitness Test in community-dwelling older adults aged 65ā75 years in Germany: results from the OUTDOOR ACTIVE study. BMC Geriatr.21 (1), 273. 10.1186/s12877-021-02188-9
2
AlulL. A. U.Gomez-CamposR.Almonacid-FierroA.Morales-MoraL.Rojas-MancillaE.PalomoI.et al (2019). Aerobic capacity of chilean adults and elderly: proposal of classification by regional percentiles. Rev. Bras. Med. do Esporte25 (5), 390ā394. 10.1590/1517-869220192505185893
3
ArigoD.AinsworthM. C.PaskoK.BrownM. M.TraversL. (2021). Predictors of change in BMI over 10 years among midlife and older adults: associations with gender, CVD risk status, depressive symptoms, and social support. Soc. Sci. and Med.279, 113995. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113995
4
BatsisJ. A.MackenzieT. A.BartelsS. J.SahakyanK. R.SomersV. K.Lopez-JimenezF. (2016). Diagnostic accuracy of body mass index to identify obesity in older adults: NHANES 1999ā2004. Int. J. Obes.40 (5), 761ā767. 10.1038/ijo.2015.243
5
Benavent-CaballerV.Rosado-CalatayudP.Segura-OrtĆE.Amer-CuencaJ. J.LisónJ. F. (2014). Effects of three different low-intensity exercise interventions on physical performance, muscle CSA and activities of daily living: a randomized controlled trial. Exp. Gerontol.58, 159ā165. 10.1016/j.exger.2014.08.004
6
Cepal (2023). āComisión Económica para AmĆ©rica,ā in Latina y el caribe (cepal). Santiago:CEPALSTAT. Available online at: https://statistics.cepal.org/portal/cepalstat/index.html?lang=es.
7
ChenH. T.LinC. H.YuL. H. (2009). Normative physical fitness scores for community-dwelling older adults. J. Nurs. Res.17 (1), 30ā41. 10.1097/JNR.0b013e3181999d4c
8
ChowB.FreyG. C.CheungS. Y.LouieH. T. L. (2005). An examination of health-related physical fitness levels in Hong Kong youth with intellectual disability. J. Exerc. Sci. Fit.3 (1), 9ā16.
9
ChungP. K.ZhaoY.LiuJ. D.QuachB. (2016). Functional fitness norms for community-dwelling older adults in Hong Kong. Archives gerontology geriatrics65, 54ā62. 10.1016/j.archger.2016.03.006
10
ChungP. K.ZhaoY.LiuJ. D.QuachB. (2017). A canonical correlation analysis on the relationship between functional fitness and health-related quality of life in older adults. Archives gerontology geriatrics68, 44ā48. 10.1016/j.archger.2016.08.007
11
Cossio-BolaƱosM.Vidal-EspinozaR.Villar-CifuentesI.de CamposL. F. C. C.de LƔzariM. S. R.Urra-AlbornozC.et al (2024). Functional fitness benchmark values for older adults: a systematic review. Front. public health12, 1335311. 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1335311
12
DemuraS.YamajiS.NagasawaY.SatoS.MinamiM.YoshimuraY. (2003). Reliability and gender differences of static explosive grip parameters based on force-time curves. J. Sports Med. Phys. Fit.43 (1), 28ā35.
13
DentE.MorleyJ. E.Cruz-JentoftA. J.WoodhouseL.RodrĆguez-MaƱasL.FriedL. P.et al (2019). Physical frailty: ICFSR international clinical practice guidelines for identification and management. J. Nutr. health and aging23 (9), 771ā787. 10.1007/s12603-019-1273-z
14
EggersdorferM.AkobunduU.BaileyR. L.ShliskyJ.BeaudreaultA. R.BergeronG.et al (2018). Hidden hunger: solutions for Americaās aging populations. Nutrients10 (9), 1210. 10.3390/nu10091210
15
FangE. F.XieC.SchenkelJ. A.WuC.LongQ.CuiH.et al (2020). A research agenda for ageing in China in the 21st century (2nd edition): focusing on basic and translational research, long-term care, policy and social networks. Ageing Res. Rev.64, 101174. 10.1016/j.arr.2020.101174
16
FlegJ. L.MorrellC. H.BosA. G.BrantL. J.TalbotL. A.WrightJ. G.et al (2005). Accelerated longitudinal decline of aerobic capacity in healthy older adults. Circulation112 (5), 674ā682. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.545459
17
Garcia-GarciaF. J.Gutierrez AvilaG.Alfaro-AchaA.Amor AndresM. S.De Los Angeles De La Torre LanzaM.Escribano AparicioM. V.et al (2011). The prevalence of frailty syndrome in an older population from Spain. The Toledo Study for Healthy Aging. J. Nutr. health and aging15 (10), 852ā856. 10.1007/s12603-011-0075-8
18
GusiN.PrietoJ.OlivaresP. R.DelgadoS.QuesadaF.CebriĆ”nC. (2012). Normative fitness performance scores of community-dwelling older adults in Spain. J. aging Phys. activity20 (1), 106ā126. 10.1123/japa.20.1.106
19
IgnasiakZ.SebastjanA.SÅawiÅskaT.SkrzekA.CzarnyW.KrólP.et al (2020b). Functional fitness normative values for elderly polish population. BMC Geriatr.20 (1), 384. 10.1186/s12877-020-0187-2
20
IgnasiakZ.SebastjanA.SÅawiÅskaT.SkrzekA.CzarnyW.KrólP.et al (2020a). Functional fitness normative values for elderly polish population. BMC Geriatr.20, 384ā389. 10.1186/s12877-020-01787-2
21
IgnasiakZ.SÅawiÅskaT.SkrzekA.KozieÅS.DrozdS. D.CzajaR. C.et al (2018). Comparison of functional physical fitness between migrants and non-migrants in Poland. Coll. Antropol.42 (4), 249ā256.
22
JonesC. J.RikliR. E.BeamW. C. (1999). A 30-s chair-stand test as a measure of lower body strength in community-residing older adults. Res. Q. Exerc. sport70 (2), 113ā119. 10.1080/02701367.1999.10608028
23
LestariS. K.de LunaX.ErikssonM.MalmbergG.NgN. (2021). A longitudinal study on social support, social participation, and older Europeans' Quality of life. SSM - Popul. health13, 100747. 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100747
24
LopesD. G.MendonçaN.HenriquesA. R.BrancoJ.CanhãoH.RodriguesA. M. (2023). Trajectories and determinants of ageing in Portugal: insights from EpiDoC, a nationwide population-based cohort. BMC public health23 (1), 1564. 10.1186/s12889-023-16370-8
25
LordS. E.RochesterL. (2005). Measurement of community ambulation after stroke: current status and future developments. Stroke36 (7), 1457ā1461. 10.1161/01.STR.0000170698.20376.2e
26
MarquesE. A.BaptistaF.SantosR.ValeS.SantosD. A.SilvaA. M.et al (2014). Normative functional fitness standards and trends of Portuguese older adults: cross-cultural comparisons. J. aging Phys. activity22 (1), 126ā137. 10.1123/japa.2012-0203
27
MerchantR. A.MorleyJ. E.IzquierdoM. (2021). Editorial: exercise, aging and frailty: guidelines for increasing function. J. Nutr. health and aging25, 405ā409. 10.1007/s12603-021-1590-x
28
NavarraG. A.TabacchiG.ScardinaA.AgneseM.ThomasE.BiancoA.et al (2023). Functional fitness, lifestyle and demographic factors as predictors of perceived physical and mental health in older adults: a structural equation model. PLoS One18 (9), e0290258. 10.1371/journal.pone.0290258
29
NotoS. (2023). Perspectives on aging and quality of life. Healthc. (Basel)11 (15), 2131. 10.3390/healthcare11152131
30
RamnathU.RauchL.LambertE. V.Kolbe-AlexanderT. L. (2018). The relationship between functional status, physical fitness and cognitive performance in physically active older adults: a pilot study. PloS one13 (4), e0194918. 10.1371/journal.pone.0194918
31
RikliR. E.JonesC. J. (1999a). Functional fitness normative scores for community-residing older adults, ages 60-94. J. Aging and Phys. Activity7 (2), 162ā181. 10.1123/japa.7.2.162
32
RikliR. E.JonesC. J. (1999b). Development and validation of a functional fitness test for community-residing older adults. J. aging Phys. activity7 (2), 129ā161. 10.1123/japa.7.2.129
33
RingsbergK.GerdhemP.JohanssonJ.ObrantK. J. (1999). Is there a relationship between balance, gait performance and muscular strength in 75-year-old women?Age ageing28 (3), 289ā293. PMID: 10475866. 10.1093/ageing/28.3.289
34
RodriguesF.DomingosC.MonteiroD.MorouƧoP. (2022). A review on aging, sarcopenia, falls, and resistance training in community-dwelling older adults. Int. J. Environ. Res. public health19 (2), 874. 10.3390/ijerph19020874
35
RossW. D.Marfell-JonesM. J. (1991). in Kinanthropometry. Physiological testing of elite athlete. Editors KineticsH.MacDougallJ. D.WengerH. A.GeenyH. J. (London), 223ā308.
36
SandovalM. H.PortaccioM. E. A.AlbalaC. (2024). Ethnic differences in disability-free life expectancy and disabled life expectancy in older adults in Chile. BMC Geriatr.24 (1), 116. 10.1186/s12877-024-04728-5
37
SkrzekA.IgnasiakZ.SÅawiÅskaT.DomaradzkiJ.FugielJ.SebastjanA.et al (2015). Structural and functional markers of health depending on lifestyle in elderly women from Poland. Clin. interventions aging10, 781ā792. 10.2147/CIA.S79485
38
SullivanA. N.LachmanM. E. (2017). Behavior change with fitness technology in sedentary adults: a review of the evidence for increasing physical activity. Front. public health4, 289. 10.3389/fpubh.2016.00289
39
UmiastowskaD.KupczykJ. (2020). Factors differentiating the level of functional fitness in polish seniors. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health17 (5), 1699. 10.3390/ijerph17051699
40
ValdĆ©s-BadillaP.Concha-CisternasY.GuzmĆ”n-MuƱozE.Ortega-SpulerJ.Vargas-VitoriaR. (2018). Reference values for the senior fitness test in Chilean older women. Rev. Medica Chile146 (10), 1143ā1150. 10.4067/S0034-98872018001001143
41
Villalobos DintransP. (2020). Health systems, aging, and inequity: an example from Chile. Int. J. Environ. Res. public health17 (18), 6546. 10.3390/ijerph17186546
42
WangC. W.YehJ. L.LiS. F.ChenC. M.WangH. H.HeC. S.et al (2024). āFunctional fitness norms of community-dwelling older adults in southern rural taiwan: a cross-sectional study,ā, Healthcare12. 213. 10.3390/healthcare12020213
43
World Health Organization (2002). āKeep fit for life,ā in Meeting the nutritional needs of older persons (Geneva).
44
XuJ.ChenY.LiJ.ZhangH.ShiM.MengH.et al (2022). Normative values and integrated score of functional fitness among Chinese community-dwelling older adults in Suzhou. Front. physiology13, 1063888. 10.3389/fphys.2022.1063888
45
ZhaoY.WangZ.ChungP. K.WangS. (2021). Functional fitness norms and trends of community-dwelling older adults in urban China. Sci. Rep.11 (1), 17745. 10.1038/s41598-021-97320-5
Summary
Keywords
normative values, functional fitness, older adults, elderly, Chile
Citation
Cossio-BolaƱos M, Vidal-Espinoza R, Castelli Correia de Campos LF, Sulla-Torres J, Urra-Albornoz C, Alvear-Vasquez F, Fuentes-Lopez J, Ramos de Lazari MS and Gomez-Campos R (2025) Normative values to assess functional fitness in older adults in a region of Chile. Front. Aging 6:1554783. doi: 10.3389/fragi.2025.1554783
Received
02 January 2025
Accepted
28 May 2025
Published
17 June 2025
Volume
6 - 2025
Edited by
Caroline Sarah Stokes, Humboldt University of Berlin, Germany
Reviewed by
Thiago Teixeira Mendes, Federal University of Bahia (UFBA), Brazil
JarosÅaw Domaradzki, Wroclaw University of Health and Sport Sciences, Poland
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2025 Cossio-Bolaños, Vidal-Espinoza, Castelli Correia de Campos, Sulla-Torres, Urra-Albornoz, Alvear-Vasquez, Fuentes-Lopez, Ramos de Lazari and Gomez-Campos.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Marco Cossio-BolaƱos, mcossio1972@hotmail.com; Rossana Gomez-Campos, rossaunicamp@gmail.com
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.