Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Aging

Sec. Musculoskeletal Aging

This article is part of the Research TopicInterdisciplinary Insights Into Musculoskeletal Aging: Mechanisms and InterventionsView all 3 articles

Muscle Quality Responses to Short-Term Resistance Training Volume in Older Adults: An Exploratory Randomized Clinical Trial

Provisionally accepted
Kevan  S KnowlesKevan S KnowlesLogan  A BanksLogan A BanksVanessa  C CabreraVanessa C CabreraWyatt  WilkinsonWyatt WilkinsonAdrian  J PantojaAdrian J PantojaIsabella  G ThomasIsabella G ThomasEmily  J ParsowithEmily J ParsowithJonathan  P BeausejourJonathan P BeausejourGrant  NorteGrant NorteJeffrey  R StoutJeffrey R StoutMatt  S StockMatt S Stock*
  • University of Central Florida, Orlando, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Age-related strength loss is more strongly tied to reduced muscle quality than muscle mass. Echo intensity (EI) measured by B-mode ultrasonography is a common marker of intramuscular adiposity and fibrous tissue. Although high-intensity resistance training is effective, the added value of higher training volumes on muscle quality and strength in older adults remains unclear. Moreover, previous studies examining EI changes following resistance training have provided mixed results. To resolve these issues, this exploratory study compared the effects of different resistance training volumes on muscle quality, size, and strength among older adults. Twenty-five older adults (14 males, 11 females; mean ± SD age = 70 ± 7 years) were randomized to moderate volume (n = 14; 2 sets per exercise; 12 sets per week) or high volume (n = 11; 6 sets per exercise; 36 sets per week) training groups. Cohort-specific test-retest reliability statistics were determined prior to the intervention. Participants trained twice weekly, performing knee extension, trap-bar deadlift, and leg press at 85% of one-repetition maximum (1RM). Pre- and post-intervention assessments included ultrasonographic measures of the vastus lateralis (VL) and rectus femoris (RF), leg lean mass, knee extension 1RM, isometric and isokinetic quadriceps strength, and functional tests. The results indicated no significant group × time interactions with small-to-moderate effect sizes, suggesting that increasing volume three-fold provided no additional benefit. When collapsed across group, improvements were found for VL EI (p = 0.025, ηp2 = 0.200), VL (p = 0.015, ηp2 = 0.232) and RF cross-sectional area (p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.440), knee extension 1RM (p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.794), isometric peak torque (p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.630), and concentric peak torque at 180°/s (p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.423) and 300°/s (p = 0.009, ηp2 = 0.263). No changes were observed in RF EI, leg lean mass, or functional performance. Despite large mean changes, only <25% of participants exceeded the minimal difference needed to be considered real for any variable. In summary, six weeks of moderate volume resistance training elicits meaningful improvements in muscle quality and strength. EI changes were muscle-specific, suggesting heterogeneous adaptations among older adults.

Keywords: Aging, strength training, Echo intensity, Ultrasonography, Quadriceps, force, Longevity

Received: 22 Jul 2025; Accepted: 31 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Knowles, Banks, Cabrera, Wilkinson, Pantoja, Thomas, Parsowith, Beausejour, Norte, Stout and Stock. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Matt S Stock, matt.stock@ucf.edu

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.