ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Amphib. Reptile Sci.

Sec. Conservation

Volume 3 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/famrs.2025.1567889

This article is part of the Research TopicEmbracing Indigenous Perspectives in HerpetologyView all articles

The Myth of the Serpent: From the Great Snake to the Henhouse

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Instituto de Desenvolvimento Sustentável Mamirauá, Tefé, Brazil
  • 2Federal University of Pará, Belém, Pará, Brazil

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

The relationship between humans and snakes is permeated by myths and legends, which have led these animals to be seen as malevolent beings since biblical times. As a result, their interaction tend to be negative, mainly in Occidental Cultures, often leading to the frequent killing of sankes in cases of perceived self-defense. Among them, anacondas stand out as the largest snake species in Brazil, widely known through legends such as the "Boiuna" and the "Cobra Grande". Since this is a semi-aquatic species, some traditional populations, like the varzeiros (riverine people who live in periodically flooded areas known as várzea), have a historical generational coexistence with these animals. Here, we focus on the várzea regions of the Lower Amazon River, where, despite the lack of official studies on snake hunting, it is a known region of conflict. By analyzing different narratives from the local populations, we dug some key points behind the conflicts between humans and the local anaconda population, aiming to understand the main causes of killings and explore potential arguments to prevent them.Our findings reveal that local dwellers possess notable ecological and biological knowledge about the anaconda, particularly its feeding and reproductive behaviors.However, their perception of these snakes remains predominantly negative. We identified a cultural aspect in the act of killing anacondas, as men often expressed a perceived necessity to do so. Most notably, we observed that the primary trigger for these killings was angerdue to economic losses -while fear acted as a deterrent to the slaughter. Based on this, our results suggest the development of a collaborative management plan and conservation strategies for anacondas, with emphasis on protecting the local economy.Improving henhouse structures and a management plan for the use or trade of anaconda fat appear to be promising initial steps.

Keywords: Ethnoherpetology, Traditional communities, conservation, anaconda killing, Brazilian Amazon

Received: 28 Jan 2025; Accepted: 16 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Cosendey and Pezzuti. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Beatriz Nunes Cosendey, Instituto de Desenvolvimento Sustentável Mamirauá, Tefé, Brazil

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.