Abstract
The recent identification of a population of non-newly born, prenatally generated “immature” neurons in the layer II of the piriform cortex (cortical immature neurons, cINs), raises questions concerning their maintenance or depletion through the lifespan. Most forms of brain structural plasticity progressively decline with age, a feature that is particularly prominent in adult neurogenesis, due to stem cell depletion. By contrast, the entire population of the cINs is produced during embryogenesis. Then these cells simply retain immaturity in postnatal and adult stages, until they “awake” to complete their maturation and ultimately integrate into neural circuits. Hence, the question remains open whether the cINs, which are not dependent on stem cell division, might follow a similar pattern of age-related reduction, or in alternative, might leave a reservoir of young, undifferentiated cells in the adult and aging brain. Here, the number and features of cINs were analyzed in the mouse piriform cortex from postnatal to advanced ages, by using immunocytochemistry for the cytoskeletal marker doublecortin. The abundance and stage of maturation of cINs, along with the expression of other markers of maturity/immaturity were investigated. Despite a marked decrease in this neuronal population during juvenile stages, reminiscent of that observed in hippocampal neurogenesis, a small amount of highly immature cINs persisted up to advanced ages. Overall, albeit reducing in number with increasing age, we report that the cINs are present through the entire animal lifespan.
Introduction
The mammalian brain is a highly complex machine needing stability (), and hardly capable of renewing its neuronal elements, especially in mammals (, ; ). These features are less strict during youth, thanks to the existence of remarkable brain plasticity, yet they can become a problem with aging (; ; ). Brain structural plasticity can occur in different forms, from synaptic changes (formation/elimination of synaptic contacts) to the genesis of new neurons, referred to as adult neurogenesis (; ; ; ). It is well known that some forms of plasticity, especially the striking structural changes involving persistent neurogenesis, progressively decline as the animal age progresses (; ; ; ; ; ). In stem cell-driven adult neurogenesis, the decrease is due to stem cell depletion and/or transition to a quiescent state. In the last few years, a counterintuitive example of “neurogenesis without division” has been shown to exist (; ; ; ; ; ). It consists of prenatally generated neurons (; ) which stop their maturation for long periods, being capable to restart it during adulthood to eventually integrate into neural circuits (; ). These immature “standby” or “dormant” neurons are here referred to as cortical immature neurons (cINs). cINs are present in the cerebral cortex, a brain region not endowed with stem cell-driven neurogenesis and characterized by high cognitive functions. The recent demonstration that cINs are more abundant and more widely distributed in large-brained, gyrencephalic mammals with respect to rodents (), suggests that they represent an evolutionary choice to grant new neurons as a sort of brain reserve in animal species endowed with high computational/cognitive capabilities linked to expanded neocortex (; , ; ).
Although the currently available information is still fragmentary, it appears that the number of layer II cINs varies across animal ages (; ; ; ; ; ; ). A general reduction in the extent of brain structural plasticity is known to affect all species, from non-mammalian vertebrates to mammals (), likely linked to lifespan and to a role in refinement of neural circuitries during brain growth and maturation (; ; ; ; , ; ; ; ). For mammalian adult neurogenesis, such a reduction has been carefully described (; ) and is considered to be associated with a decrease in cell division (), as a consequence of progressive exhaustion/depletion/quiescence of neural stem cells (; ).
The question remains open whether also the cINs, which are not dependent on stem cell division, might follow a similar pattern of reduction or whether they might be considered as a reservoir of young, undifferentiated neurons in the adult/aging brain (; ; ). To answer this question, we investigated the amount of DCX+ cINs in the mouse paleocortex at six different ages, from postnatal month 1 to the old age of 15 months (Figure 1A), at three anterior-posterior levels of the piriform cortex (Figure 1B). Cell density (linear density: number of cells/mm in the cortical layer II perimeter) and percentage of type 1 (small, unipolar/bipolar, highly immature neuronal precursors) and type 2 cINs (large, ramified, less immature “complex” cells; see Figure 2B’) were considered (Figure 1C). Furthermore, we studied the coexpression of DCX with other markers for maturity/immaturity, such as the anti-adhesive form of the Neural Cell Adhesion Molecule N-CAM (PSA-NCAM; ), whose expression is known to maintain immaturity in the piriform cortex cINs (), and NeuN, a marker of post-mitotic neurons starting differentiation (), in search for possible variation at the different ages.
FIGURE 1
FIGURE 2

Detection and counting of DCX+ cells in the piriform cortex at different ages. (A) representative photographs from histological staining of the piriform cortex (caudal domain) and confocal images of DCX staining at all ages considered. Note the age-dependent progressive reduction in cINs. (B) Pie charts indicating the percentages of type 1 (yellow) and type 2 cells (brown); note the progressive decrease of type 2 “complex” cells with respect to the type 1, highly immature cells. (B’) Schematic representation of the type 1 (yellow) and type 2 cells (brown) corresponding to different morphologies and different maturational stages of the cINs. (C) Results of the cell counting carried out on ImageJ software; (C’) total DCX+ cell counting; (C”) counting within the rostral, middle, and caudal domain of the piriform cortex. Scale bars: 200 μm (histology); 30 μm (immunofluorescence).
Materials and methods
Animals and tissue processing
Animal experiments were performed in agreement with the “Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes,” according to protocol number 785_2019PR, following the Institutional guidelines of IBBC/CNR and the approval of the Ethical Committee. Mice C57/BL6 (Charles River Laboratories, RRID:MGI:3696370) were housed in cages with corncob bedding in conventional animal facility. All animals were maintained under standard laboratory conditions with an artificial 12 h light/dark cycle (lights on at 7:00 a.m. and off at 7:00 p.m.), temperature controller (22 ± 2°C) and humidity maintenance (55 ± 5%). Mice took a standard diet with access to food and water ad libitum. For our experiments, only male mice were used.
Animals aged 1, 3, 5, 7, 12, 15 months (4 animals for each age; Figure 1A) were deeply anesthetized and perfused with a 4% solution of paraformaldehyde (PFA) dissolved in 0.01 M PBS. After cardiac perfusion the brains were isolated, post-fixed overnight in PFA at 4°C and equilibrated in 30% sucrose. Brains were embedded in Tissue-Tek OCT (Sakura, Alphen an den Rijn, The Netherlands), cut by cryostat at −25°C in 40 μm thick coronal, serial free-floating sections.
Immunofluorescence for DCX, polysialylated neural cell adhesion molecule (PSA-NCAM), NeuN, and NG2
The entire anterior-to-posterior length of the piriform cortex, easily identifiable in toluidine blue-stained sections (Figure 1B), extended for approximately 5 mm at all ages; 120 coronal sections (40 μm thick) were considered in each animal (4.8 mm piriform cortex length; see Supplementary Table 1). Three different series of slices were collected: rostral sections (approximately from Bregma +2.46 to Bregma −0.34,
Image processing and cell quantification
Images were collected using a Nikon Eclipse 90i confocal microscope (Nikon, Melville, NY, USA). All images were processed using Adobe Photoshop CS4 (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA, USA) and ImageJ version 1.53t (Wayne Rasband, Research Services Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).
DCX+ cell quantification was performed on three immunofluorescence-stained sections/animal (one/each series–rostral, middle, and caudal–located in the middle of the series; 12 sections/age; total: 72 sections), in which 40× confocal fields were acquired in order to represent the entire ventral-to-dorsal length of the piriform cortex in each section (4–8 confocal fields/section, depending on the length and orientation of the piriform cortex, see Supplementary Figure 1; total number of confocal fields analyzed: 419). DCX+ cell counting was performed directly by an experienced operator, using “Cell Counter” Plugin of ImageJ software. In each section, confocal field (objective: 40×; corresponding to 318,215 μm × 318,215 μm) were acquired along the layer II of the paleocortex (see above). Then, the total perimeter of paleocortical layer II was traced using the “Straight line” tool of ImageJ (Supplementary Figure 1C) and all DCX+ cells along its length were counted in each confocal acquisition (linear density = number of cells/mm). In the same sections, the morphology of cINs was evaluated and the number of type 1 and type 2 cells (identified on the basis of their cell soma size: <9, type 1 cells; ≥9, type 2 cells) was counted using different markers selected from the Cell Counter toolbar in ImageJ software. The cell soma size (diameter) was obtained by evaluating the width orthogonal to main axis. Cells cut on the superior surface of the stack were not considered, to avoid overcounting.
Counting of DCX/PSA-NCAM, DCX/NeuN, and DCX/NG2 double staining was performed on the three-month-old and the fifteen-month-old animals. Three 40× confocal fields were considered along the ventral-to-dorsal extension of the piriform cortex, in each of two coronal sections/animal (corresponding to middle and caudal regions, which are the most enriched in DCX+ cells); a total of 353 (DCX/PSA-NCAM) and 252 (DCX/NeuN) coexpressing cells were counted. Similarly, counting of DCX and NG2 possible coexpression was performed as for the above-mentioned markers (on three 40× confocal fields along the ventral-to-dorsal extension of the piriform cortex, in each of two coronal sections/animal corresponding to middle and caudal regions); a total of 215 DCX+ cells were counted.
Statistical analysis
All graphs and statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism Software (San Diego California, USA) using different non-parametric tests: Mann-Whitney test, Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparison post-test and Two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-hoc test. p < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Median was used as a central measure.
Results
Immunocytochemical detection and morphology of DCX+ cells
Immunocytochemistry for DCX was carried out by using one of the best performing antibodies for this antigen in mice (
FIGURE 3

Coexpression of DCX and markers for maturity/immaturity in cINs at different ages (3 and 15 months). (A) Coexpression of DCX and PSA-NCAM (top, in neurogenic sites; bottom left, in piriform cortex), and DCX and NeuN (bottom right, in piriform cortex) in young and old mice. Below each double staining image in the piriform cortex, pie charts indicate the percentage of marker coexpression (gray, single-stained DCX+ cells; black, double-stained cells, with PSA-NCAM or NeuN, respectively). (B) Coexpression of DCX and PSA-NCAM in cells with different morphology reminiscent of different degrees of maturation (the smaller, unipolar/bipolar type 1 and larger, ramified type 2 cells represent the extremes). Arrowheads: red, DCX+ cells; green, PSA-NCAM+ cells; yellow, cells coexpressing the two markers. Overall, all types of cells and combinations of staining are detectable at different ages, and in different maturational stages of the cells. The coexpression of markers for immaturity (DCX and PSA-NCAM) in cell soma and processes is frequent in type 1, small cells, even at 15 months (see higher magnification in the inset). Features linked to maturity (DCX staining without PSA-NCAM or DCX/NeuN coexpression are detectable in type 2, large cells). (C) Double staining with anti-DCX and anti-NG2 antibodies. No coexpression of the two markers was ever found, neither in young (3-months-old) nor in old (15-months-old) animals. Green arrowheads, NG2+ cells; red arrowheads, DCX+ type 1 neurons; red arrows, DCX+ type 2 neurons. Scale bars: 30 μm.
Counting of total DCX+ cells, and type 1/type 2 cells, in the piriform cortex
Total counting of layer II DCX+ cells in the whole piriform cortex, and selective counting in each anterior-middle-posterior part were performed on confocal images using ImageJ software (Figure 2C). Linear density was used considering that cINs are arranged in a monolayer-like row within the piriform cortex (see
TABLE 1
| Age comparison | Piriform cortex | Dentate gyrus |
| 1 m vs. 2 m | – | −50% |
| 1 m vs. 3 m | −19% | −97% |
| 1 m vs. 4 m | – | −261% |
| 1 m vs. 5 m | −106% | −374% |
| 1 m vs. 7 m | −394% | −1094% |
| 1 m vs. 9 m | – | −1568% |
| 1 m vs. 12 m | −972% | – |
| 1 m vs. 15 m | −1560% | – |
Percentages of DCX+ cells age-related reduction of cortical immature neurons (present work; Figure 4A) and hippocampal adult neurogenesis (
m, months; bold, comparable ages.
To evaluate whether the distribution of DCX+ immature neurons might be heterogeneous through the anterior-posterior extension of the piriform cortex, the linear density obtained in three regions (anterior, middle, posterior; Figure 1B) was considered. Two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-hoc tests found no big differences among these regions at all the ages considered, apart from a slightly higher amount in middle and caudal regions with respect to rostral (Figure 2C”).
Type 1/type 2 abundance (expressed in percentage) is represented in pie charts in Figure 2B. A decrease of large type 2 (complex) cells with respect to small type 1 (simple) cells was evident with age progression, reaching a minimum at 12 months (Figure 2B).
DCX/PSA-NCAM and DCX/NeuN coexpression at different ages
The cytoskeletal protein DCX and the membrane-bound, anti-adhesive molecule PSA-NCAM are known to be generally coexpressed in cortical immature neurons (
In DCX/NeuN double staining, coexpression was frequently observed in type 2 cells with mature morphologies, both at 3 and 15 months (Figure 3A, bottom). Type 2 cells expressing only DCX were also detected both at 3 and 15 months (red arrowhead in Figure 3A, bottom), likely reflecting more immature forms which will express NeuN later (e.g., transitional forms coexpressing PSA-NCAM in the correspondent double staining). Counting of DCX/PSA-NCAM and DCX/NeuN double staining are reported as pie charts and percentages in Figure 3A. While coexpression with PSA-NCAM remained substantially unvaried from 3 to 15 months of age, coexpression with NeuN increased with age, more than doubling at 15 months.
Since previous studies using transgenic reporter mouse suggested that some oligodendrocyte precursors may express DCX (
Discussion
The recent identification of DCX+ cells in the piriform cortex layer II as non-newborn, “immature” or “dormant” neurons (history reviewed in
Occurrence of layer II cortical “immature” neurons progressively decreases across lifespan
Our findings show that occurrence of DCX+ cINs is very high during juvenile stages, declining at young-adult ages to reach lower levels with aging (Figure 2). Since these cINs do not depend on stem cell activity (they are produced during embryogenesis and then persist as immature, “dormant” elements in postnatal and adult ages,
FIGURE 4

Age-related decrease of different populations of DCX+ cells in mice (A,B), and in comparison with other mammals (C). (A,B) Comparison between non-newly born, immature neurons of the piriform cortex [cINs; (A)] and newly born neurons of the hippocampal dentate gyrus (B). (A) Data obtained in the present study demonstrating the decrease of cINs during life (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01); (B) panel reproducing Figure 5 in
No big differences in the amount of cINs were observed by comparing the three anterior-posterior subregions of the piriform cortex at different ages, apart from a slight prevalence of DCX+ cells in middle and caudal regions with respect to the rostral one (Figures 1B, 2C”), indicating that the total number of cINs at each age and their age-related decrease can be considered a general feature of the piriform cortex. We did such a distinction since a recent study showed that piriform cortex connectivity is spatially structured in triadic circuit motifs along its anterior-posterior axis (
The general decrease observed here for the cINs show similarities with that of hippocampal adult neurogenesis (
Variation in cell types and marker coexpression linked to different maturational stages
The two cell morphologies indicated as type 1 and type 2 cells are known to represent the extremes of the maturational process of cINs during the period of DCX expression (Figures 1C, 4B’). Such maturation has been well characterized using the DCX-CreERT2/Flox-EGFP transgenic mouse, in which the immature, DCX-expressing cells can be followed across time with green fluorescent protein, until full maturation (and consequent loss of DCX staining) and functional integration into the layer II circuits (
Two additional markers were used in association with DCX to assess the neuronal maturational stage of the cINs, as described in
The analysis carried out on DCX/PSA-NCAM double staining revealed coexpression of the two markers in most immature cells of the piriform cortex, involving all morphological types: type 1 cells, type 2 cells and transitional forms, at all the ages investigated (Figure 3B). Only few DCX+ type 2 cells were devoid of PSA-NCAM, likely corresponding to the most complex forms, close to the accomplishment of their full maturation (Figure 3B). Accordingly, it was recently demonstrated that PSA-NCAM depletion promotes maturation of cINs in rodent paleocortex (
On the other hand, the increase in the number of DCX+ cells coexpressing NeuN (more than doubling at 15 months; pie charts in Figure 3A) might be caused by a slowing down of the maturational process with increasing age, resulting in some cells being “blocked” in a “late immature” state. Under such assumption, one could also explain the decrease of type 2 cells with respect to type 1 cells in older animals. Namely, the age-related decrease in the percentage of type 2 cells would be justified by a dwindling, yet maintained, population of ever-immature type 1 cell (small reservoir of highly plastic cells), on one hand, and by some type 2 cells slowing down their maturation with age, on the other.
Comparison with adult hippocampal neurogenesis
The findings obtained in the present study on the cIN age-related variation in the piriform cortex appear quite similar to those reported for the neurogenic process of the hippocampal dentate gyrus in C57BL/6 mice from 1 to 9 months (
Of course, our data and data collected from Ben Abdallah are heterogeneous. First of all, our quantification of DCX+ cells was performed using a direct cell counting on ImageJ software instead of stereological methods with Stereoinvestigator, as done by
Overall, the decrease of cINs during young/adult stages can fit with the general view of structural plasticity as a process which is prevalent during youth, to allow the refinement of brain circuits on the basis of experience (in mouse, mainly linked to olfactory experience). Yet, a more moderate decrease of cINs with respect to adult neurogenesis, can leave a “small reserve” of young elements even during adult/senior stages. A fact that seems even more evident in large-brained mammals (see below).
Comparison with data available in large-brained mammals and humans: a link with lifespan?
Comparative studies carried out in mammals revealed the existence of remarkable interspecies differences in the occurrence, distribution, and amount of cINs, with greater abundance of these cells in large-brained, gyrencephalic mammals (
Overall, the currently available results indicate that mammalian species characterized by small, lissencephalic brain, short lifespan and rapid development of the nervous system (such as the laboratory mouse) are endowed with a small population of cINs, which is restricted to the paleocortex and follows a temporal pattern of reduction very similar to that of stem cell-driven adult neurogenesis. By contrast, large-brained, long-living species, which have far higher amount and more widespread distribution of cINs (including the entire neocortex) seem to maintain longer these populations of “young” neurons across adulthood and aging, suggesting a slowing down of their maturation/integration through the lifespan. The idea that cINs might represent a “cognitive reserve” for the cerebral cortex in long-living species (
Conclusion
Recent findings revealed that brain structural plasticity can occur in different forms varying with age, brain region, and species, thus stressing the importance of defining plasticity along temporal and spatial dimensions (
Findings of the present study, along with recent comparative data obtained in large-brained, long-living mammals, do suggest that cINs can behave conversely, by maintaining their presence when the stem cell-driven neurogenesis has started to decline. In this process, interspecies differences are important: stem cell-driven neurogenesis and cINs appear to behave similarly in rodents but differently in large-brained species, suggesting a positive selection of cINs across evolution, as a preferential form of plasticity in large-brained mammals (
In conclusion, considering the temporal dimension of plasticity in mammals, it is possible that the situation of stem cell-driven neurogenesis in young-adult rodents is more similar to human childhood (
Statements
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics statement
The animal study was reviewed and approved by “Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes,” according to protocol number 785_2019PR, following the Institutional guidelines of IBBC/CNR and the approval of the Ethical Committee. Mice C57/BL6 (Charles River Laboratories, RRID:MGI:3696370).
Author contributions
LB and SF-V conceived and designed the work. LB, MG, and SF-V wrote the manuscript. SC-D, BB, and CL edited the manuscript. LB, MG, SC-D, BB, and SF-V provided conceptual feedback. CL performed statistical analyses. SF-V and SC-D provided animals. EV, MG, and NM performed the analysis. LB, SF-V, SC-D, and BB provided funding. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This study was supported by Progetto Trapezio, Compagnia di San Paolo (67935-2021.2174) to LB, and Fondazione CRT (Cassa di risparmio di Torino; RF = 2022.0618) to LB; Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Ph.D. Program to NM; University of Turin (Ph.D. program in Veterinary Sciences) to MG; and by the Paracelsus Medical University of Salzburg, PMU Research and Innovation Fund (PMU-RIF) Seed Money for Novel Innovative Ideas and Preparatory Projects (SEED); project number: 2021-SEED-003-Benedetti.
Acknowledgments
We thank Elsevier for authorization to reproduce the chart in Figure 4B (License number: 5471970279499).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fncel.2023.1205173/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AiJ.LuoR.TuT.YangC.JiangJ.ZhangB.et al (2021). Doublecortin-expressing neurons in Chinese tree shrew forebrain exhibit mixed rodent and primate-like topographic characteristics.Front. Neuroanat.15:727883. 10.3389/fnana.2021.727883
2
Ben AbdallahN. M.SlomiankaL.VyssotskiA. L.LippH. P. (2010). Early age-related changes in adult hippocampal neurogenesis in C57 mice.Neurobiol. Aging31151–161. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2008.03.002
3
BenedettiB.Couillard-DespresS. (2022). Why would the brain need dormant neuronal precursors?Front. Neurosci.16:877167. 10.3389/fnins.2022.877167
4
BenedettiB.DannehlD.KönigR.CovielloS.KreutzerC.ZaunmairP.et al (2020). Functional integration of neuronal precursors in the adult murine piriform cortex.Cereb. Cortex301499–1515. 10.1093/cercor/bhz181
5
Bogado LopesJ.SenkoA. N.BahnsenK.GeislerD.KimE.BernanosM.et al (2023). Individual behavioral trajectories shape whole-brain connectivity in mice.eLife12:e80379. 10.7554/eLife.80379
6
BondA. M.MingG.SongH. (2015). Adult mammalian neural stem cells and neurogenesis: Five decades later.Cell Stem Cell17385–395. 10.1016/j.stem.2015.09.003
7
BondA. M.MingG.-l.SongH. (2022). What is the relationship between hippocampal neurogenesis across different stages of the lifespan?Front. Neurosci.16:891713. 10.3389/fnins.2022.891713
8
BonfantiL. (2006). PSA-NCAM in mammalian structural plasticity and neurogenesis.Prog. Neurobiol.80129–164. 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2006.08.003
9
BonfantiL. (2011). From hydra regeneration to human brain structural plasticity: A long trip through narrowing roads.ScientificWorldJournal111270–1299. 10.1100/tsw.2011.113
10
BonfantiL. (2013). The (Real) neurogenic/gliogenic potential of the postnatal and adult brain parenchyma.ISRN Neurosci.2013:354136. 10.1155/2013/354136
11
BonfantiL.CharvetC. J. (2021). Brain plasticity in humans and model systems: Advances, challenges, and future directions.Int. J. Mol. Sci.22:9358. 10.3390/ijms22179358
12
BonfantiL.NacherJ. (2012). New scenarios for neuronal structural plasticity in non-neurogenic brain parenchyma: The case of cortical layer II immature neurons.Prog. Neurobiol.981–15. 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2012.05.002
13
BonfantiL.SekiT. (2021). The PSA-NCAM-positive “immature” neurons: An old discovery providing new vistas on brain structural plasticity.Cells10:2542. 10.3390/cells10102542
14
BrownJ. P.Couillard-DesprésS.Cooper-KuhnC. M.WinklerJ.AignerL.KuhnH. G. (2003). Transient expression of doublecortin during adult neurogenesis.J. Comp. Neurol.4671–10. 10.1002/cne.10874
15
CaiY.XiongK.ChuY.LuoD.LuoX.YuanX.et al (2009). Doublecortin expression in adult cat and primate cerebral cortex relates to immature neurons that develop into GABAergic subgroups.Exp. Neurol.216342–356. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2008.12.008
16
ChenY.ChenX.BaserdemB.ZhanH.LiY.DavisM. B.et al (2022). High-throughput sequencing of single neuron projections reveals spatial organization in the olfactory cortex.Cell1854117–4134.e28. 10.1016/j.cell.2022.09.038
17
CovielloS.BenedettiB.JakubecovaD.BellesM.KlimczakP.GramuntellY.et al (2021). PSA depletion induces the differentiation of immature neurons in the piriform cortex of adult mice.Int. J. Mol. Sci.22:5733. 10.3390/ijms22115733
18
CovielloS.GramuntellY.KlimczakP.VareaE.Blasco-IbañezJ. M.CrespoC.et al (2022). Phenotype and distribution of immature neurons in the human cerebral cortex layer II.Front. Neuroanat.16:851432. 10.3389/fnana.2022.851432
19
DuqueA.ArellanoJ. I.RakicP. (2021). An assessment of the existence of adult neurogenesis in humans and value of its rodent models for neuropsychiatric diseases.Mol. Psychiatr.27377–382. 10.1038/s41380-021-01314-8
20
EncinasJ. M.MichurinaT. V.PeunovaN.ParkJ.-H.TordoJ.PetersonD. A.et al (2011). Division-coupled astrocytic differentiation and age-related depletion of neural stem cells in the adult hippocampus.Cell Stem Cell8566–579. 10.1016/j.stem.2011.03.010
21
FrotscherM. (1992). Specificity of interneuronal connections.Ann. Anat.174377–382. 10.1016/s0940-9602(11)80254-2
22
GhibaudiM.AmentaA.AgostiM.RivaM.GraïcJ.-M.BifariF.et al (2023). Consistency and variation in doublecortin and Ki67 antigen detection in the brain tissue of different mammals, including humans.Int. J. Mol. Sci.24:2514. 10.3390/ijms24032514
23
GhibaudiM.BonfantiL. (2022). How widespread are the “young” neurons of the mammalian brain?Front. Neurosci.16:918616. 10.3389/fnins.2022.918616
24
Gómez-ClimentM. A.Castillo-GómezE.VareaE.GuiradoR.Blasco-IbáñezJ. M.CrespoC.et al (2008). A population of prenatally generated cells in the rat paleocortex maintains an immature neuronal phenotype into adulthood.Cereb. Cortex182229–2240. 10.1093/cercor/bhm255
25
Gómez-ClimentM. A.GuiradoR.Castillo-GomezE.VareaE.Gutierrez-MecinasM.Gilabert-JuanJ.et al (2011). The polysialylated form of the Neural Cell Adhesion Molecule (PSA-NCAM) is expressed in a subpopulation of mature cortical interneurons characterized by reduced structural features and connectivity.Cereb. Cortex211028–1041.
26
GradyC. (2012). The cognitive neuroscience of ageing.Nat. Rev. Neurosci.13491–505. 10.1038/nrn3256
27
Gusel’nikovaV. V.KorzhevskiyD. E. (2015). NeuN as a neuronal nuclear antigen and neuron differentiation marker.Acta Naturae742–47. 10.32607/20758251-2015-7-2-42-47
28
Herculano-HouzelS.CataniaK.MangerP. R.KaasJ. H. (2015). Mammalian brains are made of these: A dataset of the numbers and densities of neuronal and nonneuronal cells in the brain of Glires, Primates, Scandentia, Eulipotyphlans, Afrotherians and Artiodactyls, and their relationship with body mass.Brain Behav. Evol.86145–163. 10.1159/000437413
29
HoffmanS.EdelmanG. M. (1983). Kinetics of homophilic binding by embryonic and adult forms of the neural cell adhesion molecule.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.805762–5766. 10.1073/pnas.80.18.5762
30
KempermannG.Bogado LopesJ.ZocherS.SchillingS.EhretF.GartheA.et al (2022). The individuality paradigm: Automated longitudinal activity tracking of large cohorts of genetically identical mice in an enriched environment.Neurobiol. Dis.175:105916. 10.1016/j.nbd.2022.105916
31
KlempinF.KronenbergG.CheungG.KettenmannH.KempermannG. (2011). Properties of doublecortin-(DCX)-expressing cells in the piriform cortex compared to the neurogenic dentate gyrus of adult mice.PLoS One6:e25760. 10.1371/journal.pone.0025760
32
KönigR.BenedettiB.RotheneichnerP.O’SullivanA.KreutzerC.BellesM.et al (2016). Distribution and fate of DCX/PSA-NCAM expressing cells in the adult mammalian cortex: A local reservoir for adult cortical neuroplasticity?Front. Biol.11:193–213. 10.1007/s11515-016-1403-5
33
La RosaC.ParolisiR.BonfantiL. (2020a). Brain structural plasticity: From adult neurogenesis to immature neurons.Front. Neurosci.14:75. 10.3389/fnins.2020.00075
34
La RosaC.CavalloF.PecoraA.ChincariniM.AlaU.FaulkesC.et al (2020b). Phylogenetic variation in cortical layer II immature neuron reservoir of mammals.eLife9:e55456. 10.7554/eLife.55456
35
La RosaC.GhibaudiM.BonfantiL. (2019). Newly generated and non-newly generated “immature” neurons in the mammalian brain: A possible reservoir of young cells to prevent brain ageing and disease?J. Clin. Med.8:E685. 10.3390/jcm8050685
36
LiY.-N.HuD.-D.CaiX.-L.WangY.YangC.JiangJ.et al (2023). Doublecortin expressing neurons in human cerebral cortex layer II and amygdala from infancy to 100 year-old.Mol. Neurobiol.603464–3485. 10.1007/s12035-023-03261-7
37
LimD. A.Alvarez-BuyllaA. (2016). The adult ventricular-subventricular zone (V-SVZ) and olfactory bulb (OB) neurogenesis.Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol.8:a018820. 10.1101/cshperspect.a018820
38
LuoJ.DanielsS. B.LenningtonJ. B.NottiR. Q.ConoverJ. C. (2006). The aging neurogenic subventricular zone.Aging Cell5139–152. 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2006.00197.x
39
LuzzatiF.BonfantiL.FasoloA.PerettoP. (2009). DCX and PSA-NCAM expression identifies a population of neurons preferentially distributed in associative areas of different pallial derivatives and vertebrate species.Cereb. Cortex191028–1041. 10.1093/cercor/bhn145
40
MullenR. J.BuckC. R.SmithA. M. (1992). NeuN, a neuronal specific nuclear protein in vertebrates.Development116201–211. 10.1242/dev.116.1.201
41
NacherJ.CrespoC.McEwenB. S. (2001). Doublecortin expression in the adult rat telencephalon.Eur. J. Neurosci.14629–644. 10.1046/j.0953-816x.2001.01683.x
42
PalazzoO.La RosaC.PiumattiM.BonfantiL. (2018). Do large brains of long-living mammals prefer non-newly generated, immature neurons?Neural Reg. Res.13633–634. 10.4103/1673-5374.230282
43
ParedesM. F.SorrellsS. F.Garcia-VerdugoJ. M.Alvarez-BuyllaA. (2016). Brain size and limits to adult neurogenesis.J. Comp. Neurol.524646–664. 10.1002/cne.23896
44
ParolisiR.CozziB.BonfantiL. (2018). Humans and dolphins: Decline and fall of adult neurogenesis.Front. Neurosci.12:497. 10.3389/fnins.2018.00497
45
PaxinosG.FranklinK. (2019). Paxinos and Franklin’s the mouse brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates, 5th Edn. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
46
PiumattiM.PalazzoO.La RosaC.CrociaraP.ParolisiR.LuzzatiF.et al (2018). Non-newly generated, “immature” neurons in the sheep brain are not restricted to cerebral cortex.J. Neurosci.38826–842. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1781-17.2017
47
RothG.DickeU. (2005). Evolution of the brain and intelligence.Trends Cogn. Sci.9250–257. 10.1016/j.tics.2005.03.005
48
RotheneichnerP.BellesM.BenedettiB.KönigR.DannehlD.KreutzerC.et al (2018). Cellular plasticity in the adult murine piriform cortex: Continuous maturation of dormant precursors into excitatory neurons.Cereb. Cortex282610–2621. 10.1093/cercor/bhy087
49
SanaiN.NguyenT.IhrieR. A.MirzadehZ.TsaiH.-H.WongM.et al (2011). Corridors of migrating neurons in the human brain and their decline during infancy.Nature478382–386. 10.1038/nature10487
50
SekiT. (2020). Understanding the real state of human adult hippocampal neurogenesis from studies of rodents and non-human primates.Front. Neurosci.14:839. 10.3389/fnins.2020.00839
51
SemënovM. V. (2019). Adult hippocampal neurogenesis is a developmental process involved in cognitive development.Front. Neurosci.13:159. 10.3389/fnins.2019.00159
52
SemënovM. V. (2021). Proliferative capacity of adult mouse brain.Int. J. Mol. Sci.22:3449. 10.3390/ijms22073449
53
SnyderJ. S. (2019). Recalibrating the relevance of adult neurogenesis.Trends Neurosci.42164–178. 10.1016/j.tins.2018.12.001
54
SorrellsS. F.ParedesM. F.Cebrian-SillaA.SandovalK.QiD.KelleyK. W.et al (2018). Human hippocampal neurogenesis drops sharply in children to undetectable levels in adults.Nature555377–381. 10.1038/nature25975
55
SrinivasanS.StevensC. F. (2017). A quantitative description of the mouse piriform cortex.bioRxiv [preprint]. 10.1101/099002
56
UrbánN.BlomfieldI. M.GuillemotF. (2019). Quiescence of adult mammalian neural stem cells: A highly regulated rest.Neuron104834–848. 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.09.026
57
VintersH. V. (2015). Emerging concepts in Alzheimer’s disease.Annu. Rev. Pathol.10291–319. 10.1146/annurev-pathol-020712-163927
58
XiongK.LuoD.PatryloP. R.LuoX.StrubleR. G.CloughR. W.et al (2008). Doublecortin-expressing cells are present in layer II across the adult guinea pig cerebral cortex: Partial colocalization with mature interneuron markers.Exp. Neurol.211271–282. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2008.02.003
59
ZhangJ.GiesertF.KloosK.Vogt WeisenhornD. M.AignerL.WurstW.et al (2010). A powerful transgenic tool for fate mapping and functional analysis of newly generated neurons.BMC Neurosci.11:158. 10.1186/1471-2202-11-158
Summary
Keywords
brain plasticity, cerebral cortex, piriform cortex, neurogenesis, mice, aging
Citation
Ghibaudi M, Marchetti N, Vergnano E, La Rosa C, Benedetti B, Couillard-Despres S, Farioli-Vecchioli S and Bonfanti L (2023) Age-related changes in layer II immature neurons of the murine piriform cortex. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 17:1205173. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2023.1205173
Received
13 April 2023
Accepted
14 July 2023
Published
28 July 2023
Volume
17 - 2023
Edited by
Oliver von Bohlen und Halbach, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Germany
Reviewed by
José Miguel Blasco Ibáñez, University of Valencia, Spain; Olivier Raineteau, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), France
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2023 Ghibaudi, Marchetti, Vergnano, La Rosa, Benedetti, Couillard-Despres, Farioli-Vecchioli and Bonfanti.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Luca Bonfanti, luca.bonfanti@unito.itStefano Farioli-Vecchioli, stefano.fariolivecchioli@cnr.it
†These authors have contributed equally to this work
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.