ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Cell. Neurosci.
Sec. Non-Neuronal Cells
Volume 19 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fncel.2025.1603657
APOE genotype-dependent differences in human astrocytic energy metabolism
Provisionally accepted- 1University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
- 2Centro de Estudios Científicos, Valdivia, Chile
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The main genetic risk factor for Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the presence of the apolipoprotein E4 (APOE4) allele. While APOE4 increases the risk of developing AD, the APOE2 allele is protective and APOE3 is risk-neutral. In the brain, APOE is primarily expressed by astrocytes and plays a key role in various processes including cholesterol and lipid transport, neuronal growth, synaptic plasticity, immune response and energy metabolism. Disruptions in brain energy metabolism are considered a major contributor to AD pathophysiology, raising a key question about how different APOE isoforms affect the energy metabolism of human astrocytes.In this study, we generated astrocytes (iAstrocytes) from APOE-isogenic human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), expressing either APOE2, APOE3, APOE4 or carrying an APOE knockout (APOE-KO), and investigated APOE genotype-dependent changes in energy metabolism. ATP Seahorse assay revealed a reduced mitochondrial and glycolytic ATP production in APOE4 iAstrocytes. In contrast, proteomic GO enrichment analysis and mitochondrial stress tests indicated increased mitochondrial respiration and activity in APOE4 iAstrocytes, accompanied with elevated proton leak, while mitochondrial fusion and fission protein levels remain unchanged. In contrast, Glycolysis glycolysis stress tests also demonstrated enhanced glycolysis and glycolytic capacity in APOE4 iAstrocytes while genetically encoded nanosensor-based FLIM analysis revealed that APOE does not affect lactate dynamics. In agreement with the increased glycolytic activity, APOE4 iAstrocytes also showed elevated mitochondrial respiration and activity, indicated by proteomic GO enrichment analysis and mitochondrial stress test. This was accompanied by elevated proton leak in APOE4 iAstrocytes while levels of mitochondrial uncoupling proteins (UCPs) were not affected. Mass spectrometry-based metabolomic analysis identified various energy and glucose metabolism-related pathways that were differentially regulated in APOE4 compared to the other genotypes, including mitochondrial electron transport chain (ETC) and glycolysis.In general, APOE2 and APOE-KO iAstrocytes showed a very similar phenotype in all functional assays and differences between APOE2/APOE-KO and APOE4 were stronger than between APOE3 and APOE4.Our study provides evidence for APOE genotype-dependent effects on astrocyte energy metabolism and highlights alterations in the bioenergetic processes of the brain as important pathomechanisms in AD.
Keywords: Apolipoprotein E (APOE), Alzheimer's disease (AD), induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), human astrocytes, Energy Metabolism, Glycolysis, Mitochondrial function, mitochondrial uncoupling
Received: 31 Mar 2025; Accepted: 07 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Tackenberg, Budny, Bodenmann, Zürcher, De Leeuw, Weber, Ravotto, Ruminot, Barros and Weber. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Christian Tackenberg, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.