Sue Han
Adalberto Merighi
Cheng Wang
Shrijeet Chakraborti- 1National Institutes of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, MD, United States
- 2Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Grugliasco, TO, Italy
- 3Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases, City of Hope National Medical Center, Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA, United States
- 4Royal Preston Hospital, Preston, United Kingdom
Editorial on the Research Topic
Methods in cellular neurobiology research
Cellular neuroscience has long relied on methodological innovation to reveal the nervous system's intricate structure and function. From Ramón y Cajal's use of Golgi staining method and the rise of electrophysiological recording to today's advanced imaging modalities and animal models, new tools have consistently propelled the field forward, enabling observations of the nervous system with ever-greater resolution and specificity. Landmark developments such as patch-clamp electrophysiology, two-photon microscopy, and genetically encoded calcium and voltage indicators have enabled detailed analyses of neuronal and glial physiology at unprecedented resolution (Denk et al., 1990; Chen et al., 2013; Luo et al., 2018). Complementary methods, including single-cell transcriptomics and advanced imaging technologies, now allow researchers to capture both the molecular and functional heterogeneity of neural cells. These approaches continue to drive forward our knowledge of excitability, connectivity, and plasticity under normal physiological conditions.
At the same time, methodological progress has transformed disease-focused neuroscience. Human induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived neurons, motor neurons, and glia cells provide patient-specific models for studying pathogenic mechanisms and testing potential therapies (Takahashi and Yamanaka, 2006; Lancaster et al., 2013). Microfluidic devices and organotypic slice preparations enable controlled exploration of axonal degeneration, glial–vascular interactions, and long-term cellular dynamics. Similarly, model organisms such as Caenorhabditis elegans offer powerful systems for dissecting conserved mechanisms of neurodegeneration (Bargmann, 1998; Reilly et al., 2020). These methods have been critical in investigating diseases ranging from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and stroke to Alzheimer's disease (AD), Parkinson's disease (PD), and chronic pain syndromes. At the molecular level, methods for probing neurodegenerative-linked protein aggregates, including amyloid-β peptide, tau protein, and α-synuclein, have provided crucial insights into the cellular basis of AD, PD, and related disorders (Hardy and Selkoe, 2002; Spillantini and Goedert, 2013). Advances in glial biology, from astrocytic imaging to extracellular vesicle analysis, further demonstrate how methodological innovation is reshaping our understanding of non-neuronal contributions to disease.
This Research Topic, Methods in Cellular neurobiology research, brings together contributions that exemplify the breadth and creativity of current methodological approaches. Collectively, these studies illustrate how technical innovation not only expands our experimental repertoire but also drives conceptual advances across the spectrum of cellular neuroscience, from basic mechanisms of excitability to translational models of neurological disease. Why now? In neuroscience, there are three bottlenecks that hinder progress: (1) visualization of the right cell and structures with sufficient spatiotemporal resolution; (2) testing mechanisms in complementary model systems; and (3) turning mechanistic insights into better biomarkers, targets, or interventions of neurological disorders. The five articles in this Topic contribute to each bottleneck from a different angle.
The Research Topic begins with a comprehensive review, “An electrophysiologist's guide to dorsal horn excitability and pain.” Rivera-Arconada et al. synthesize intrinsic and synaptic determinants of dorsal horn firing (Na+, K+, HCN, GIRK, Ca2+-activated K+ currents), emphasizing strong cellular heterogeneity and the limits of predicting biochemical phenotype or morphology from firing patterns. This framework guides interpretation of circuit plasticity in injury and inflammation. In another method paper, Humpel introduces a microcontact-printing method that deposits antibodies for GFAP and laminin directly onto 150μm organotypic slices, enabling week-scale live imaging on standard inverted microscopes. The approach supports patterned, local delivery, lowers costs, and reduces animal use, expanding access to vascular–glial studies. In a research article, Otomo et al. use a compartmentalized microfluidic chip to examine early axonal phenotypes in iPSCderived motor neurons carrying FUS/TLS mutations. By DIV7 they detect growth restriction and altered mitochondrial trafficking; viability remains comparable early but declines by days 14 and 21, and stress worsens deficits. The platform yields tractable readouts for mechanism and drug discovery. In another interesting research article, Zhang et al. report that memantine-preconditioned MSC-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs), enriched in miR-139-5p and miR-133b, outperform conventional EVs in a mouse photothrombotic stroke model. These EVs improve functional recovery, reduce infarct burden, mitigate excitotoxicity, and activate neuroregenerative pathways, illustrating microenvironment-tailored EV engineering. Finally, Torres et al. review C. elegans as a fast, genetically precise system to interrogate proteinopathy, aging, and neuron–glia interactions. Tools such as transgenics, inducible expression, and pharmacology create efficient pipelines that bridge in vitro assays and mammalian studies. Together, these contributions span ionic mechanisms, accessible imaging platforms, disease modeling, and translational strategies, offering practical methods and conceptual clarity for probing and modulating neural systems in health and disease.
Taken together, this Research Topic shows how method innovation is already widening the three bottlenecks we outlined. Patterned microcontact printing is breaking the resolution barrier, making it possible to conduct weeks-long, low-cost live imaging of astroglia–vessel dynamics in organotypic slices. This gives standard microscopes routine access to glial biology and neurovascular remodeling. Utilizing a compartmentalized microfluidic platform, researchers can now perform precise mechanism testing by deriving quantitative axonal-phenotype assays from patient iPSC-derived motor neurons. This technique is powerful because it captures axonal growth and mitochondrial trafficking defects before degeneration, accelerating ALS research and drug screening. For translational impact, a targeted approach involves preconditioning mesenchymal-stromal-cell extracellular vesicles with an NMDAR inhibitor. This strategic modification reprograms the EV cargo for better efficacy, successfully helping to mitigate excitotoxicity and promote neurorepair in stroke models. It directly links mechanistic insight to therapeutic intervention. Model diversity is strengthened by a concise electrophysiological framework for dorsal horn excitability that anchors cellular heterogeneity to pain phenotypes, and by C. elegans pipelines that rapidly connect proteinopathy and neuron–glia interactions to conserved targets, streamlining paths from discovery to mammalian validation. Together, these methods equip cellular neuroscience to interrogate fundamental circuit rules, glia–vascular crosstalk, and neurodegenerative pathways, while building tractable routes from basic science to interventions across pain, stroke, and other neurological diseases. Overall, the work presented provides a strong foundation for future studies aiming to unravel the complexities of the nervous system in health and disease.
Author contributions
SH: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. AM: Writing – review & editing. CW: Writing – review & editing. SC: Writing – review & editing.
Acknowledgments
The authors are thankful to the contributors to this Research Topic as well as the Editorial support of the Journal.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Bargmann, C. I. (1998). Neurobiology of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome. Science 282, 2028–2033. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5396.2028
Chen, T.-W., Wardill, T. J., Sun, Y., Pulver, S. R., Renninger, S. L., Baohoan, A., et al. (2013). Ultrasensitive fluorescent proteins for imaging neuronal activity. Nature 499, 295–300. doi: 10.1038/nature12354
Denk, W., Strickler, J. H., and Webb, W. W. (1990). Two-photon laser scanning fluorescence microscopy. Science 248, 73–76. doi: 10.1126/science.2321027
Hardy, J., and Selkoe, D. J. (2002). The amyloid hypothesis of Alzheimer's disease: progress and problems on the road to therapeutics. Science 297, 353–356. doi: 10.1126/science.1072994
Lancaster, M. A., Renner, M., Martin, C.-A., Wenzel, D., Bicknell, L. S., Hurles, M. E., et al. (2013). Cerebral organoids model human brain development and microcephaly. Nature 501, 373–379. doi: 10.1038/nature12517
Luo, L., Callaway, E. M., and Svoboda, K. (2018). Genetic dissection of neural circuits: a decade of progress. Neuron 98, 256–281. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.03.040
Reilly, M. B., Cros, C., Varol, E., Yemini, E., and Hobert, O. (2020). Unique homeobox codes delineate all the neuron classes of C. elegans. Nature 584, 595–601. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2618-9
Spillantini, M. G., and Goedert, M. (2013). Tau pathology and neurodegeneration. Lancet Neurol. 12, 609–622. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70090-5
Keywords: dorsal horn excitability, microcontact printing, organotypic slice culture, iPSC-derived neurons, microfluidic compartmentalization, extracellular vesicles, C. elegans, neurodegeneration
Citation: Han S, Merighi A, Wang C and Chakraborti S (2025) Editorial: Methods in cellular neurobiology research. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 19:1713920. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2025.1713920
Received: 26 September 2025; Accepted: 14 October 2025;
Published: 28 October 2025.
Edited and reviewed by: Dirk M. Hermann, University of Duisburg-Essen, Clinic for Neurology, Germany
Copyright © 2025 Han, Merighi, Wang and Chakraborti. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Sue Han, c3VlLmhhbkBuaWguZ292