ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Conserv. Sci.
Sec. Conservation Genetics and Genomics
This article is part of the Research TopicRestoration Genetics and GenomicsView all 5 articles
Unveiling a legacy of fish introductions to mountain lakes using historical records and eDNA surveys in a National Park
Provisionally accepted- 1Four Peaks Environmental Science & Data Solutions LLC, Wenatchee, United States
- 2US Geological Survey, Western Fisheries Research Center, Seattle, United States
- 3US Geological Survey Fort Collins Science Center, Fort Collins, United States
- 4National Park Service - Olympic National Park, Port Angeles, United States
- 5US Geological Survey Western Fisheries Research Center, Seattle, United States
- 6Resource Environmental Solutions, Sacramento, United States
- 7US Geological Survey Pacific Northwest Environmental DNA Laboratory, Boise, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Across the western United States, introductions of non-native fish into historically fishless mountain lakes have impacted native biota. Understanding the impacts of fish introductions is essential for conservation in Olympic National Park, a Biosphere Reserve. We reconstructed fish plantings using records dating back to 1930, followed by environmental DNA (eDNA) surveys to estimate the current distribution of fish and amphibians in 117 remote mountain lakes. We used Bayesian multiscale occupancy models to determine how lake attributes and planting history related to fish and amphibian occupancy. The most frequently detected species were Brook Trout, Rainbow Trout, Cascades Frog, and Northwestern Salamander. eDNA sampling revealed 52 lakes with amphibians only, 45 with fish and amphibians, 14 with fish only, and 6 unoccupied. Of the 53 lakes with planting records, 38 had fish eDNA detected. Fish eDNA was also detected in 21 lakes lacking planting records, which could reflect incomplete records, unauthorized plantings, and false positive detections. Of the three species planted, Cutthroat Trout had the highest failure rate and did not become established in 23 of 28 historically planted lakes. In a subset of 9 lakes sampled for up to 7 years, those with known fish and amphibian presence showed consistent eDNA detections over time. The number of times a lake was stocked was the best predictor of occupancy for Brook and Rainbow trout, while higher occupancy for Brook Trout was also associated with lower elevations, lower solar radiation, and larger lake area. We did not observe widespread negative associations between amphibian occupancy and fish presence, although there was a negative relationship between fish presence and Rough-skinned Newt and Long-toed Salamander occupancy. Cascades Frog occupancy showed no relationship to fish presence or lake traits. Our results suggest mechanisms of fish persistence over time and highlight areas where native amphibians are impacted by introduced fish. These results can guide management options like targeted fish removals that benefit native fauna while still supporting recreational fishing. More broadly, our work demonstrates the value of combining historical records with contemporary surveys and the utility of eDNA for broad-scale surveys of species distribution in remote wilderness areas.
Keywords: Amphibians, brook trout, multiscale occupancy model, Non-native trout, protectedarea, rainbow trout
Received: 03 Sep 2025; Accepted: 08 Dec 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Brenkman, Duda, McCaffery, Kierczynski, Hoy, Kumec, Baccus, Goldberg, Ostberg and Fradkin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Samuel J Brenkman
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
