ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Digit. Health
Sec. Human Factors and Digital Health
This article is part of the Research TopicAI implementation in Medical Imaging and Oncology: Understanding the Complex Clinical, Technological, Ethical, Societal, Professional and Organizational Factors that Have an ImpactView all articles
R-AI-diographers: Investigating the perceived impact of Artificial Intelligence on Radiographers' Careers, Roles, and Professional Identity in the UK
Provisionally accepted- 1City University of London, London, United Kingdom
- 2Gateshead Health NHS Foundation Trust, Gateshead, England, United Kingdom
- 3Magnitiki Tomografia Kerkiras, Corfu, Greece
- 4University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, South East England, United Kingdom
- 5Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Portsmouth, United Kingdom
- 6University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
- 7Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, Maidstone, London, City of, United Kingdom
- 8Essen University Hospital, Essen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
- 9Hospital Universitari Parc Taulí, Sabadell, Spain
- 10University of Pécs, Pécs, Baranya, Hungary
- 11Aleksandër Xhuvani University, Elbasan, Elbasan, Albania
- 12IRCCS San Donato Polyclinic, San Donato Milanese, Italy
- 13University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Western Switzerland, Delémont, Jura, Switzerland
- 14University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- 15European Federation of Radiographer Societies (EFRS), Cumieira, Portugal
- 16Hanze University of Applied Sciences, Groningen, Netherlands
- 17University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
- 18Society and College of Radiographers, London, United Kingdom
- 19Bayes Business School, City University of London, London, England, United Kingdom
- 20NHS England, London, England, United Kingdom
- 21Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- 22European Society of Medical Imaging Informatics (EuSoMII), Vienna, Austria
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Abstract Introduction Artificial Intelligence (AI) is being increasingly integrated into radiography, affecting daily responsibilities and workflows. Most studies focus on AI’s influence on clinical performance or workflows; fewer explore radiographers’ perspectives on how AI affects their roles and the profession. This study aims to investigate the perceived impact of AI on radiographers' careers, roles and professional identity in the UK. Methods A UK-wide, cross-sectional, online survey including 32 questions was conducted using snowball sampling to gather responses from qualified radiographers and radiography students. The survey gathered data on: a) demographics, b) perceived short-term impacts of AI on roles and responsibilities, c) potential medium-to-long-term impacts, d) opportunities and threats from AI, and e) preparedness to work with AI. Overall perceptions (optimism, neutrality, or pessimism) were derived from cumulative answers to a subset of 6 questions. Results A total of 322 valid responses were received, showing general optimism about medium-to-long-term impact of AI on careers, roles and professional identity (60.7% optimistic). Most respondents (70.8%) reported no formal AI education or training, with AI education emerging as the top priority for improving preparedness in clinical practice. Concerns centered around the potential deskilling of radiographers and AI inefficiencies. However, 81.2% agreed AI would not replace radiographers in the long term. Conclusion Radiographers are broadly optimistic about AI's impact but express concerns about deskilling due to reliance on AI. While their optimism is encouraging for recruitment and retention, there is a clear need for AI-specific education to enhance preparedness to work with AI.
Keywords: Artificial intelligence (AI), radiographer, Radiography, professional identity, Clinical roles, AI education, Workforce preparedness
Received: 31 Mar 2025; Accepted: 17 Nov 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Walsh, Stogiannos, Ohene-Botwe, McHugh, Spurge, Potts, Gibson, Tam, O'Sullivan, Quinsten, Gorga, Sipos, Dybeli, Zanardo, Sá Dos Reis, Mekis, Buissink, England, Beardmore, Cunha, Goodall, St John-Matthews, McEntee, Kyratsis and Malamateniou. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Gemma Walsh, gemma.walsh@outlook.com
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
