Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Digit. Health

Sec. Health Communications and Behavior Change

Volume 7 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1623247

Quality and Reliability of Osteoarthritis-Related Health Information on Short Video Platforms: A Cross-Sectional Comparative Study of TikTok and Bilibili

Provisionally accepted
Qi -Heng  ZuoQi -Heng Zuo1,2Kai  DuKai Du1,2Ao  LiAo Li1,2Chen-yu  ZhangChen-yu Zhang1,2Ren  GuoRen Guo2Ping  ChenPing Chen2Wei -Shuai  DuWei -Shuai Du2Yong -Li  ZuoYong -Li Zuo2Shu-ming  LiShu-ming Li2*
  • 1Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
  • 2Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: The proliferation of short video platforms has transformed public health communication, yet the quality of medical information shared on these platforms remains inconsistent. Osteoarthritis (OA), a prevalent and burdensome chronic condition, is frequently featured in online health content. However, the reliability of such information has not been systematically evaluated across major Chinese short video platforms. To assess and compare the quality and reliability of OA-related health information on TikTok and Bilibili, and to examine the influence of uploader type and user engagement metrics on content quality. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, a total of 189 OA-related videos were collected from TikTok (n=96) and Bilibili (n=93) using a standardized search strategy. Four validated instruments—the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmarks, modified DISCERN (mDISCERN), Global Quality Score (GQS), and Health on the Net Code (HONcode)—were used for video assessment. Each video was independently rated by two trained reviewers. Differences in quality scores were compared across platforms and uploader types (health professionals vs. non-professionals). Spearman correlation analysis was conducted to explore associations between video quality and engagement metrics (likes, comments, shares, favorites). Results: TikTok videos exhibited significantly higher median scores on JAMA (2.4 vs. 2.1, P=0.001), GQS (3.0 vs. 3.0, P=0.006), and HONcode (11.0 vs. 9.3, P=0.005) compared to Bilibili. No significant difference was observed for mDISCERN scores. Videos uploaded by healthcare professionals had significantly higher GQS (P=0.004) and HONcode scores (P=0.010) than those from non-professionals. User engagement metrics were positively correlated with content quality, particularly on TikTok (e.g., likes vs. JAMA, r=0.732, P<0.001). Conclusions: OA-related videos on TikTok demonstrate higher overall quality and reliability compared to Bilibili, especially when created by healthcare professionals. User engagement metrics are positively associated with information quality, underscoring the importance of expert-led digital health communication. These findings highlight the need for platform-level interventions to promote trustworthy content and improve the digital health information ecosystem.

Keywords: Osteoarthritis, Social Media, Quality of health information, TikTok, Bilibili, Health Communication, Patient Education

Received: 05 May 2025; Accepted: 22 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Zuo, Du, Li, Zhang, Guo, Chen, Du, Zuo and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Shu-ming Li, lishuming@bjzhongyi.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.