Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Digit. Health

Sec. Human Factors and Digital Health

Volume 7 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1629289

This article is part of the Research TopicDigital Health Past, Present, and FutureView all 29 articles

What are the functionalities and features of mobile health record apps supporting persons experiencing social exclusion? A systematic literature review

Provisionally accepted
Felicien  IzaturwanahoFelicien Izaturwanaho1*Marie  Elizabeth WardMarie Elizabeth Ward2,3Clíona  Ní CheallaighClíona Ní Cheallaigh4,5Maeve  MoranMaeve Moran1Geraldine  FitzgeraldGeraldine Fitzgerald6David  MocklerDavid Mockler6Una  GearyUna Geary2Siobhán  CorriganSiobhán Corrigan1
  • 1School of Psychology, Centre for Innovative Human Systems, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
  • 2Quality and Safety Improvement Directorate, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
  • 3Centre for Innovative Human Systems, School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
  • 4Inclusion Health Service, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
  • 5School of Medicine, Department of Clinical Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
  • 6The Library of Trinity Dublin College, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Research into mobile health record apps has focused on narrow outcomes, such as medication adherence for persons experiencing chronic conditions. However, no review has examined their use in the context of social exclusion. Persons experiencing social exclusion (PESE) face complex health needs, limited healthcare access, and increased exposure to traumatic life experiences. It is imperative to consider a trauma-informed and integrated care approaches when developing an app for them, and they should be involved as key stakeholders to ensure equitable care. This review examined these apps' functionalities and features that support PESE in relation to their reported outcomes and the delivery of a trauma-informed and/or integrated care. Methods: A systematic search of ten databases: Web of Science Core Collection, Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase, Scopus, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses A&I, Lenus and OpenGrey International were undertaken, and was supplemented with non-indexed and grey literature. Searches were undertaken in April 2024 in English with no date limit, and used the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Studies were deemed eligible if they met the SPIDER framework criteria. Results: One thousand three hundred and thirty-two papers were found eligible for the review, of which eleven qualified for inclusion following screening and quality assessment using QATSDD and MMAT tools. Four themes were found (supporting integrated and connected care; enhancement of user engagement and care coordination; improving data accuracy and access to care; and provision of ongoing monitoring and feedback) related to apps'functionalities and features, which in turn were linked to reported outcomes. Although a few of these apps' functionalities and features were aligned with the six principles of trauma-informed care, none of them were implemented considering a trauma-informed care and/or integrated care. Conclusion: This review provided insights into the complexities of implementing a mobile health record app for PESE. However, limited available data restricted a comprehensive understanding of these apps' functionalities and features in their specific implementation settings in relation to their reported outcomes. Next steps include translating these findings into survey and interview questions to identify end-user requirements for developing an app for PESE from a trauma-informed perspective to promote integrated care.

Keywords: Inclusion health, End-user requirements, mobile health record app, Integrated Care, Homelessness, opiate substitution therapy, Personal health record, Trauma-informed care

Received: 15 May 2025; Accepted: 15 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Izaturwanaho, Ward, Cheallaigh, Moran, Fitzgerald, Mockler, Geary and Corrigan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Felicien Izaturwanaho, School of Psychology, Centre for Innovative Human Systems, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.