Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Digit. Health

Sec. Connected Health

Volume 7 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1629413

This article is part of the Research TopicUnlocking the Potential of Health Data: Interoperability, Security, and Emerging Challenges in AI, LLM, Precision Medicine, and Their Impact on Healthcare and ResearchView all 9 articles

AI powered Data Curation & Publishing Virtual Assistant (AIDAVA): Usability, explainability/causability and patient interest in the first generation (G1) prototype

Provisionally accepted
Rutger  Van MierloRutger Van Mierlo1,2,3,4*Wenjie  LiangWenjie Liang2Kerli  NorakKerli Norak5Michaela  KarglMichaela Kargl6Mall  MaasikMall Maasik5Anne-Lore  BynensAnne-Lore Bynens7Markus  PlassMarkus Plass6Markus  KreuzthalerMarkus Kreuzthaler8Martin  BenediktMartin Benedikt9Laura  HochstenbachLaura Hochstenbach10Arnoud  van 't HofArnoud van 't Hof1,3,4Remzi  CelebiRemzi Celebi11Andre  DekkerAndre Dekker2Isabelle  DE ZEGHERIsabelle DE ZEGHER12Petros  KalendralisPetros Kalendralis2
  • 1Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
  • 2Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+ (MUMC+), Maastricht, Netherlands
  • 3Department of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+ (MUMC+), Maastricht, Netherlands
  • 4Department of Cardiology, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Heerlen, Netherlands
  • 5Department of Health Technologies, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia
  • 6Diagnostic and Research Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
  • 7Clinical Data Science, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), Maastricht, Netherlands
  • 8Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Documentation, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
  • 9Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
  • 10Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
  • 11Department of Advanced Computing Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
  • 12B!loba, Tervuren, Belgium

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Introduction Ensuring high quality and reusability of personal health data is costly and time-consuming. An AI powered virtual assistant for health data curation and publishing could support patients to ensure harmonization and data quality enhancement, which improves interoperability and reusability. This formative evaluation study aimed to assess the usability of the first-generation (G1) prototype developed during the AI powered data curation & publishing virtual assistant (AIDAVA) Horizon Europe project. Methods In this formative evaluation study, we planned to recruit 45 breast cancer patients and 45 cardiovascular disease patients in three European countries. An intuitive front-end, supported by AI and non-AI data curation tools, is being developed across two generations. G1 was based on existing curation tools and early prototypes of tools being developed. Patients were tasked to ingest and curate their personal health data, creating a personal health knowledge graph that represents their integrated, high quality medical records. Usability of G1 was assessed using the system usability scale. Subjective importance of explainability/causability and perceived fulfilment of these needs by G1 as well as interest in AIDAVA-like technology was explored using study specific questionnaires. Results A total of 83 patients were recruited; 70 patients completed the study, of whom 19 were unable to successfully curate their health data due to configuration issues when deploying the curation tools. Patients rated G1 as marginally acceptable on the system usability scale (59.10 ± 19.75/100), moderately positive on explainability/causability (3.3-3.8/5) and moderately positive to positive regarding their interest in AIDAVA-like technology (3.4-4.4/5). Discussion Despite its marginal acceptability, G1 shows potential for automating data curation into a personal health knowledge graph, but it has not reached full maturity yet. G1 deployed very early prototypes of tools planned for the second generation (G2) prototype, which might have contributed to lower usability and explainability/causability scores. Conversely, patient interest in AIDAVA-like technology seems quite high at this stage of development, likely due to the promising potential of data curation and data publication technology. Improvements in the library of data curation and publishing tools are planned for G2 and are necessary to fully realize the value of the AIDAVA solution.

Keywords: Data curation, interoperability, reusability, usability, Explainability, Causability, artificial intelligence, Data publishing

Received: 15 May 2025; Accepted: 22 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Van Mierlo, Liang, Norak, Kargl, Maasik, Bynens, Plass, Kreuzthaler, Benedikt, Hochstenbach, van 't Hof, Celebi, Dekker, DE ZEGHER and Kalendralis. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Rutger Van Mierlo, rutger.vanmierlo@maastrichtuniversity.nl

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.